Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:02:57.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2018

Nicholas Crafts
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Forging Ahead, Falling Behind and Fighting Back
British Economic Growth from the Industrial Revolution to the Financial Crisis
, pp. 130 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, M. (1986), ‘Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind’, Journal of Economic History, 46, 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramovitz, M. and David, P. A. (1996), ‘Convergence and Deferred Catch-Up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism’, in Landau, R., Taylor, T. and Wright, G. (eds.), The Mosaic of Economic Growth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2162.Google Scholar
Abramovitz, M. and David, P. A. (2001), ‘Two Centuries of American Macroeconomic Growth: From Exploitation of Resource Abundance to Knowledge-Driven Development’, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 01–05.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. (1998), ‘Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 10551089.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D.(2002), ‘Directed Technical Change’, Review of Economic Studies, 69, 781809.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D.(2010), ‘When Does Labor Scarcity Encourage Innovation?Journal of Political Economy, 118, 10371076.Google Scholar
Acheson, G. G., Campbell, G., Turner, J. D. and Vanteeva, N. (2015), ‘Corporate Ownership and Control in Victorian Britain’, Economic History Review, 68, 911936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M. and Rey, P. (1997), ‘Corporate Governance, Competition Policy and Industrial Policy’, European Economic Review, 41, 797805.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P.(2006), ‘Appropriate Growth Theory: A Unifying Framework’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 269314.Google Scholar
Aldcroft, D. H. and Oliver, M. J. (2000), Trade Unions and the Economy: 1870–2000. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Allen, R. C. (2009a), The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. C.(2009b), ‘Engels’ Pause: Technical Change, Capital Accumulation, and Inequality in the British Industrial Revolution’, Explorations in Economic History, 46, 418435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. C.(2012), ‘Technology and the Great Divergence: Global Economic Development Since 1820’, Explorations in Economic History, 49, 116.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. W. S. and Brunner, E. (1950), ‘Productivity and the Businessman’, Oxford Economic Papers, 2, 197225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badinger, H. (2005), ‘Growth Effects of Economic Integration: Evidence from the EU Member States’, Review of World Economics, 141, 5078.Google Scholar
Bairoch, P. (1982), ‘International Industrialisation Levels from 1750 to 1980’, Journal of European Economic History, 11, 269331.Google Scholar
Bairoch, P.(1991), ‘The City and Technological Innovation’, in Higonet, P., Landes, D. and Rosovsky, H. (eds.), Favorites of Fortune. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 159176.Google Scholar
Bakker, G., Crafts, N. and Woltjer, P. (2017), ‘A Vision of the Growth Process in a Technologically Progressive Economy’, University of Warwick CAGE Working Paper No. 341.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. and Robert-Nicoud, F. (2007), ‘Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 10641093.Google Scholar
Baliga, S. and Polak, B. (2004), ‘The Emergence and Persistence of the Anglo-Saxon and German Financial Systems’, Review of Financial Studies, 17, 129163.Google Scholar
Bamberg, J. H. (1988), ‘The Rationalisation of the British Cotton Industry in the Interwar Years’, Textile History, 19, 83102.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1999), ‘Notes on Growth Accounting’, Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 119137.Google Scholar
Bean, C. and Crafts, N. (1996), ‘British Economic Growth Since 1945: Relative Economic Decline … and Renaissance?’ in Crafts, N. and Toniolo, G. (eds.), Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-David, D., Lumsdaine, R. and Papell, D. H. (2003), ‘Unit Roots, Postwar Slowdowns and Long-Run Growth: Evidence from Two Structural Breaks’, Empirical Economics, 28, 303319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, K. (1960), ‘International Trade and the Rate of Economic Growth’, Economic History Review, 12, 351359.Google Scholar
Blanchflower, D., Oswald, A. and Sanley, P. (1996), ‘Wages, Profits, and Rent-Sharing’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 227252.Google Scholar
Bloom, N. and van Reenen, J. (2007), ‘Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 13511408.Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Safun, R. and van Reenen, J. (2016), ‘Management as a Technology’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 11312.Google Scholar
Booth, A. (1987), ‘Britain in the 1930s: A Managed Economy’, Economic History Review, 40, 499522.Google Scholar
Bowden, S. M. (1991), ‘Demand and Supply Constraints in the Interwar UK Car Industry: Did the Manufacturers Get It Right?Business History, 33, 241267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, G. R. and Hatton, T. J. (2002), ‘New Estimates of British Unemployment, 1870–1913’, Journal of Economic History, 62, 643675.Google Scholar
Bretherton, R. F., Burchardt, F. A. and Rutherford, R. S. G. (1941), Public Investment and the Trade Cycle in Great Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers (1940), Report of the Royal Commission on the Distribution of the Industrial Population, Cmnd. 6153.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers (1944), Employment Policy After the War. Cmnd. 6527.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. (1994), ‘Why Was Unemployment in Post-war Britain So Low?Bulletin of Economic Research, 46, 241261.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N.(1997), The Productivity Race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S. N.(1998), ‘How Did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain? A Sectoral Analysis of Comparative Productivity Levels’, Journal of Economic History, 58, 375407.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N.(2003), ‘Human Capital and Productivity Performance: Britain, the United States and Germany, 1870–1990’, in David, P. A. and Thomas, M. (eds.), The Economic Future in Historical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 103133.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. (2006), Market Services and the Productivity Race, 1850–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S.(2013), ‘Accounting for the Great Divergence’, paper presented to conference on ‘Long Run Growth: Unified Growth Theory and Economic History’, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N., Campbell, B. and van Leeuwen, B. (2013), ‘When Did Britain Industrialise? The Sectoral Distribution of the Labour Force and Labour Productivity in Britain, 1381–1851’, Explorations in Economic History, 50, 1627.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M. and van Leeuwen, B. (2015), British Economic Growth, 1270–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. and Crafts, N. (1990), ‘The Implications of British Macroeconomic Policy in the 1930s for Long-Run Growth Performance’, Rivista di Storia Economica, 7, 119.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. and Crafts, N.(1992), ‘Britain’s Productivity Gap in the 1930s: Some Neglected Factors’, Journal of Economic History, 52, 531558.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N. and Crafts, N.(1996), ‘British Economic Policy and Industrial Performance in the Early Postwar Period’, Business History, 38, 6591.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. and Crafts, N. (2001), ‘Competition and Innovation in 1950s Britain’, Business History, 43, 97118.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. and Marrison, A. (2002), ‘External Economies of Scale in the Lancashire Cotton Industry, 1900–1950’, Economic History Review, 55, 5177.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. and O’Mahony, M. (2007), ‘Britain’s Twentieth-Century Productivity Performance in International Perspective’, in Crafts, N., Gazeley, I. and Newell, A. (eds.), Work and Pay in Twentieth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 301329.Google Scholar
Brown, W., Bryson, A. and Forth, J. (2008), ‘Competition and the Retreat from Collective Bargaining’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper No. 318.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (2003), ‘Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 793808.Google Scholar
Buigues, P. A. and Sekkat, K. (2011), ‘Public Subsidies to Business: An International Comparison’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11, 124.Google Scholar
Bulpitt, J. and Burnham, P. (1999), ‘Operation Robot and the British Political Economy in the Early-1950s: The Politics of Market Strategies’, Contemporary British History, 13, 131.Google Scholar
Burgess, K. (1975), The Origins of British Industrial Relations. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. M., Oliner, S. D. and Sichel, D. E. (2013), ‘Is the Information Technology Revolution Over?International Productivity Monitor, 25, 2036.Google Scholar
Cain, L. P. and Paterson, D. G. (1986), ‘Biased Technical Change, Scale, and Factor Proportions in American Industry, 1850–1919’, Journal of Economic History, 46, 153164.Google Scholar
Cain, P. (1988), ‘Railways, 1870–1914: The Maturity of the Private System’, in Freeman, M. and Aldcroft, D. H. (eds.), Transport in Victorian Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 93133.Google Scholar
Cameron, G. and Wallace, C. (2002), ‘Macroeconomic Performance in the Bretton Woods Era and After’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 479494.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. and Turner, J. D. (2011), ‘Substitutes for Legal Protection: Corporate Governance and Dividends in Victorian Britain’, Economic History Review, 64, 571597.Google Scholar
Carlin, W. and Soskice, D. (2006), Macroeconomics: Imperfections, Institutions and Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, S. B., Gartner, S. S., Haines, M. R., Olmstead, A. L., Sutch, R. and Wright, G. (eds.) (2006), Historical Statistics of the United States: Earliest Times to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cassis, Y. (2006), Capitals of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cette, G. and Lopez, J. (2012), ‘ICT Demand Behaviour: An International Comparison’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21, 397410.Google Scholar
Chabot, B. R. and Kurz, C. J. (2010), ‘That’s Where the Money Was: Foreign Bias and English Investment Abroad, 1866–1907’, Economic Journal, 120, 10561079.Google Scholar
Chambers, D. (2014), ‘The City and the Corporate Economy Since 1870’, in Floud, R., Humphries, J. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 255278.Google Scholar
Cheffins, B. R. (2008), Corporate Ownership and Control: British Business Transformed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheffins, B. R., Koustas, D. K. and Chambers, D. (2013), ‘Ownership Dispersion and the London Stock Exchange’s ‘Two-Thirds Rule’: An Empirical Test’, Business History, 55, 670693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, P. C., Hilber, C. A. L. and Kaplanis, I. (2015), ‘Land-Use Regulation and Productivity – Land Matters: Evidence from a UK Supermarket Chain’, Journal of Economic Geography, 22, 4373.Google Scholar
Ciliberto, F. (2010), ‘Were British Cotton Entrepreneurs Technologically Backward?: Firm-Based Evidence on the Adoption of Ring Spinning’, Explorations in Economic History, 47, 487504.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (1987), ‘Why Isn’t the Whole World Developed? Lessons from the Cotton Mills’, Journal of Economic History, 47, 141173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. (1985), Industrial Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clarke, R., Davies, S. and Driffield, N. (1998), Monopoly Policy in the UK: Assessing the Evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cochrane, S. (2009), ‘Explaining London’s Dominance in International Financial Services, 1870–1913’, University of Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 455.Google Scholar
Conway, P., de Rosa, D., Nicoletti, G. and Steiner, F. (2006), ‘Regulation, Competition and Productivity Convergence’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 509.Google Scholar
Corti, G. (1976), ‘Perspectives on Public Corporations and Public Enterprises in Five Nations’, Annals of Collective Economy, 47, 4786.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (1990), ‘Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-In’, Journal of Economic History, 50, 541567.Google Scholar
Coyle, C. and Turner, J. D. (2013), ‘Law, Politics, and Financial Development: The Great Reversal of the UK Corporate Debt Market’, Journal of Economic History, 73, 810846.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (1984), ‘Patterns of Economic Development in Nineteenth Century Europe’, Oxford Economic Papers (1984), 36, 438458.Google Scholar
Crafts, N.(1985), British Economic Growth During the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crafts, N.(1987), ‘Long Term Unemployment in Britain in the 1930s’, Economic History Review, 40, 418432.Google Scholar
Crafts, N.(1989), ‘Revealed Comparative Advantage in Manufacturing, 1899–1950’, Journal of European Economic History (1989), 18, 127137.Google Scholar
Crafts, N.(1995), ‘Exogenous or Endogenous Growth: The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered’, Journal of Economic History, 55, 745772.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (1998), ‘Forging Ahead and Falling Behind: The Rise and Relative Decline of the First Industrial Nation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 193210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. (2002), ‘The Solow Productivity Paradox in Historical Perspective’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3142.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2004a), ‘Productivity Growth in the Industrial Revolution: A New Growth Accounting Perspective’, Journal of Economic History, 64, 521535.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2004b), ‘Steam as General Purpose Technology: A Growth Accounting Perspective’, Economic Journal, 114, 338351.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2005), ‘The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the Slow Growth/Rapid Industrialization Paradox’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 525534.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2009), ‘Solow and Growth Accounting: A Perspective from Quantitative Economic History’, History of Political Economy, 41(5), 200220.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2011), ‘Explaining the First Industrial Revolution: Two Views’, European Review of Economic History, 15, 153168.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2012), ‘British Relative Economic Decline Revisited: The Role of Competition’, Explorations in Economic History, 49, 1729.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2013), ‘Returning to Growth: Policy Lessons from History’, Fiscal Studies, 34, 255282.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. (2014), ‘Walking Wounded: The British Economy in the Aftermath of World War I’. www.voxeu.org/article/walking-wounded-british-economy-aftermath-world-war-iGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. (2016), ‘The Growth Effects of EU Membership for the UK: A Review of the Evidence’, University of Warwick CAGE Working Paper No. 280.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Harley, C. K. (2004), ‘Precocious British Industrialisation: A General Equilibrium Perspective’, in de la Escosura, L. Prados (ed.), Exceptionalism and Industrialisation: Britain and Its European Rivals, 1688–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86107.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Leunig, T. (2005), The Historical Significance of Transport for Economic Growth and Productivity, analytical evidence paper for the Eddington Transport Study. http://collections.europarchiv.org/tna/19200701291225Google Scholar
Crafts, N., Leunig, T. and Mulatu, A. (2008), ‘Were British Railway Companies Well-Managed in the Early Twentieth Century?Economic History Review, 61, 842866Google Scholar
Crafts, N., Leybourne, S. J. and Mills, T. C. (1989), ‘The Climacteric in Late-Victorian Britain and France: A Re-appraisal of the Evidence’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4, 103117.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Magnani, M. (2013), ‘The Golden Age and the Second Globalization in Italy’, in Toniolo, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Italian Economy Since Unification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69107.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Mills, T. C. (2004), ‘Was 19th-Century British Growth Steam-Powered? The Climacteric Revisited’, Explorations in Economic History, 41, 156171.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Mills, T. C. (2005), ‘TFP Growth in British and German Manufacturing, 1950–1996’, Economic Journal, 115, 649670.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Mills, T. C.(2013), ‘Rearmament to the Rescue? New Estimates of the Impact of Keynesian Policies in 1930s’ Britain’, Journal of Economic History, 73, 10771104.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Mulatu, A. (2006), ‘How Did the Location of Industry Respond to Falling Transport Costs in Britain Before World War I?Journal of Economic History, 66, 575607.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Thomas, M. (1986), ‘Comparative Advantage in UK Manufacturing Trade, 1910–1935’, Economic Journal, 96, 629645.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Toniolo, G. (2008), ‘European Economic Growth, 1950–2005: An Overview’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6863.Google Scholar
Crespi, G., Criscuolo, C. and Haskel, J. (2007), ‘Information Technology, Organizational Change and Productivity Growth: Evidence from UK Firms’, London School of Economics Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No. 783.Google Scholar
Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J. and Martin, R. (2004), ‘Import Competition, Productivity and Restructuring in UK Manufacturing’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20, 393408.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (1993), Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2007), ‘Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems’, American Political Science Review, 101, 373391.Google Scholar
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2010), ‘Co-evolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems’, American Political Science Review, 104, 393403.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. J. (1995), Progress and Poverty: An Economic and Social History of Britain, 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. J. (2002), Just Taxes: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1914–1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1991), ‘Computer and Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too-Distant Mirror’, in OECD, Technology and Productivity: the Challenge for Economic Policy, 315–347. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1994), ‘Why Are Institutions the “Carriers of History”? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5, 205220.Google Scholar
Davies, R., Haldane, A. G., Nielsen, M. and Pezzini, S. (2014), ‘Measuring the Costs of Short-Termism’, Journal of Financial Stability, 12, 1625.Google Scholar
Deane, P. and Cole, W. A. (1962), British Economic Growth, 1688–1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Jong, H. and Woltjer, P. (2011), ‘Depression Dynamics: A New Estimate of the Anglo-American Manufacturing Productivity Gap in the Interwar Years’, Economic History Review, 64, 472492.Google Scholar
DeLong, J. B. (1991), ‘Did J. P. Morgan’s Men Add Value? An Economist’s Perspective on Financial Capitalism’, in Temin, P. (ed.), Inside the Business Enterprise: Historical Perspectives on the Use of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 205250.Google Scholar
Dickerson, A. P., Gibson, H. D. and Tsakalotos, E. (1998), ‘Takeover Risk and Dividend Strategy: A Study of UK Firms’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 281300.Google Scholar
Dutton, H. I. (1984), The Patent System and Inventive Activity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, M. (1982), Overseas Investment in the Age of High Imperialism: The United Kingdom, 1850–1914. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D. (1996), Science, Technology and the British Industrial ‘Decline’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D. E. H. and Horrocks, S. (1994), ‘British Industrial Research and Development Before 1945’, Economic History Review, 47, 213238.Google Scholar
Edquist, H. (2010), ‘Does Hedonic Price Indexing Change our Interpretation of Economic History? Evidence from Swedish Electrification’, Economic History Review, 63, 500523.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (1989), A History of Financial Accounting. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. and Ogilvie, S. (1996), ‘Universal Banks and German Industrialization: A Reappraisal’, Economic History Review, 49, 427446.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. (2012), ‘Was the New Deal Contractionary?American Economic Review, 102, 524555.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (1996), ‘Institutions and Economic Growth: Europe After World War II’, in Crafts, N. and Toniolo, G. (eds.), Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3872.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (2007), The European Economy Since 1945. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. and Boltho, A. (2008), ‘The Economic Impact of European Integration’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6820.Google Scholar
Elbaum, B. and Lazonick, W. (1986), ‘An Institutional Perspective on British Decline’, in Elbaum, B. and Lazonick, W. (eds.), The Decline of the British Economy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 117.Google Scholar
Ennew, C., Greenaway, D. and Reed, G. (1990), ‘Further Evidence on Effective Tariffs and Effective Protection in the UK’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 6978.Google Scholar
Feinstein, C. H. (1972), National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feinstein, C. H. (1981), ‘Capital Accumulation and the Industrial Revolution’, in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D. N. (eds.), The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 128142.Google Scholar
Feinstein, C. H., Matthews, R. C. O. and Odling-Smee, J. C. (1982), ‘The Timing of the Climacteric and Its Sectoral Incidence in the UK, 1873–1913’, in Kindleberger, C. P. and Tella, G. di (eds.), Economics in the Long View: Essays in Honour of W. W. Rostow, vol. 2. London: Macmillan, 168185.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R. and Rodrik, D. (1991), ‘Resistance to Reform: Status-Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty’, American Economic Review, 81, 11461155.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander J. (2011), A Great Leap Forward: 1930s Depression and U.S. Economic Growth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, R. J., Soskice, D. W. and Ulman, L. (1983), Unionism, Economic Stabilization, and Incomes Policies: European Experience. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Florence, P. S. (1961), Ownership, Control and Success of Large Companies: An Analysis of English Industrial Structure and Policy 1936–1951. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Fohlin, C. (2012), Mobilizing Money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, J. (1990), ‘The 1856 Companies Act and the Birth and Death of Firms’, in Jobert, P. and Moss, M. (eds.), The Birth and Death of Companies: An Historical Perspective. Carnforth: Parthenon Publishing Group, 3346.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, J. and Hannah, L. (2012), ‘Extreme Divorce: The Managerial Revolution in UK Companies Before 1914’, Economic History Review, 65, 12171238.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, J. and Hannah, L. (2013), ‘Some Consequences of the Early Twentieth-Century British Divorce of Ownership from Control’, Business History, 55, 543564.Google Scholar
Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Rossi, S. (2009), ‘Ownership: Evolution and Regulation’, Review of Financial Studies, 22, 40094056.Google Scholar
Economics, Frontier (2014), Rates of Return to Investment in Science and Innovation. London.Google Scholar
Gardner, N. (1976), ‘The Economics of Launching Aid’, in Whiting, A. (ed.), The Economics of Industrial Subsidies. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Garside, W. R. (1990), British Unemployment 1919–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geroski, P. (1990), ‘Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure’, Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 586602.Google Scholar
Geroski, P. and Jacquemin, A. (1988), ‘The Persistence of Profits: A European Comparison’, Economic Journal, 98, 375389.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A. (1962), Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, O. (2009), ‘Corporatism and Growth: Testing the Eichengreen Hypothesis’, MSc Dissertation, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Goetzmann, W. N. and Ukhov, A. D. (2006), ‘British Investment Overseas 1870–1913: A Modern Portfolio Theory Approach’, Review of Finance, 10, 261300.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. and Katz, L. F. (1999), ‘The Shaping of Higher Education: The Formative Years in the United States, 1890–1940’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 3762.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. and Katz, L.F. (2008), The Race Between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C. A. E. and Bhansali, R. J. (1970), ‘Political Economy’, Political Studies, 18, 43106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gospel, H. (2005), ‘Markets, Firms and Unions’, in Fernie, S. and Metcalf, D. (eds.), Trade Unions: Resurgence or Demise? Abingdon: Routledge, 1944.Google Scholar
Greasley, D. and Oxley, L. (1996), ‘Discontinuities in Competitiveness: The Impact of the First World War on British Industry’, Economic History Review, 49, 82100.Google Scholar
Green, R. and Haskel, J. (2004), ‘Seeking a Premier-League Economy: The Role of Privatization’, in Card, D., Blundell, R., and Freeman, R. (eds.), Seeking a Premier Economy: The Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 63108.Google Scholar
Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. (1994), ‘Determinants of the Inter-Industry Structure of Protection in the UK’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56, 399419.Google Scholar
Gregg, P., Machin, S. and Metcalf, D. (1993), ‘Signals and Cycles: Productivity Growth and Change in Union Status in British Companies, 1984–9’, Economic Journal, 103, 894907.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. (2001), ‘Product Market Competition, Efficiency and Agency Costs: An Empirical Analysis’, Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper No. 01/12.Google Scholar
Griffith, R., Redding, S. and van Reenen, J. (2001), ‘Measuring the Cost-Effectiveness of an R & D Tax Credit for the UK’, Fiscal Studies, 22, 375399.Google Scholar
Guinnane, T. (2002), ‘Delegated Monitors, Large and Small: Germany’s Banking System, 1890–1914’, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 73124.Google Scholar
Guinnnane, T., Harris, R. and Lamoreaux, N. (2014), ‘Contractual Freedom and the Evolution of Corporate Control in Britain, 1862 to 1929’, NBER Working Paper No. 20481.Google Scholar
Gust, C. and Marquez, J. (2004), ‘International Comparisons of Productivity Growth: The Role of Information Technology and Regulatory Practices’, Labour Economics, 11, 3358.Google Scholar
Habakkuk, H. J. (1962), American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haldane, A. G. (2017), ‘Productivity Puzzles’. Speech at London School of Economics, March 20. www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/2017/968.aspxGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’, in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 168.Google Scholar
Hannah, L. (1974), ‘Takeover Bids in Britain Before 1950: An Exercise in Business Pre-History’, Business History, 16, 6577.Google Scholar
Hannah, L. (1983), The Rise of the Corporate Economy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hannah, L. (2014), ‘Corporations in the US and Europe, 1790–1860’, Business History, 56, 865899.Google Scholar
Hannah, L. (2015), ‘A Global Corporate Census: Publicly Traded and Close Companies in 1910’, Economic History Review, 68, 548573.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A. and Woessmann, L. (2012), ‘Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Education’, Journal of Economic Growth, 17, 267321.Google Scholar
Harley, C. K. (2013), ‘British and European Industrialization’, University of Oxford Discussion Paper in Economic and Social History No. 111.Google Scholar
Harley, C. K. and Crafts, N. (2000), “Simulating the Two Views of the Industrial Revolution’, Journal of Economic History, 60, 819841.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (1976), ‘Skills, Coal and British Industry in the Eighteenth Century’, History, 61, 167182.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2000), Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organization, 1720-1844. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R., Siegel, D. S. and Wright, M. (2005), ‘Assessing the Impact of Management Buyouts on Economic Efficiency: Plant-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 148153.Google Scholar
Hart, P. E. (1968), ’A Long-Run Analysis of the Rate of Return on Capital in Manufacturing Industry, United Kingdom, 1920–62’, in Hart, P. E. (ed.), Studies in Profit, Business Saving and Investment in the United Kingdom, 1920–1962. London: George Allen & Unwin, 220283.Google Scholar
Haskel, J. (1991), ‘Imperfect Competition, Work Practices and Productivity Growth’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53, 265279.Google Scholar
Haskel, J. and Sadun, R. (2012), ‘Regulation and UK Retailing Productivity: Evidence from Micro-Data’, Economica, 79, 425448.Google Scholar
Hatton, T. J. and Thomas, M. (2013), ‘Labour Markets in Recession and Recovery: The UK and the USA in the 1920s and 1930s’, in Crafts, N. and Fearon, P. (eds.), The Great Depression of the 1930s: Lessons for Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 328357.Google Scholar
Haydu, J. (1988), ‘Employers, Unions, and American Exceptionalism: Pre-World War I Open Shops in the Machine Trades in Comparative Perspective’, International Journal of Social History, 33, 2541.Google Scholar
Helm, D. and Tindall, T. (2009), ‘The Evolution of Infrastructure and Utility Ownership and Its Implications’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25, 411434.Google Scholar
Henderson, P. D. (1977), ‘Two British Errors: Their Probable Size and Some Possible Lessons’, Oxford Economic Papers, 29, 159205.Google Scholar
Hendry, J. (1989), Innovating for Failure: Government Policy and the Early British Computer Industry. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hickson, K. (2004), ‘The Postwar Consensus Revisited’, The Political Quarterly, 75, 142154.Google Scholar
Hitiris, T. (1978), ‘Effective Protection and Economic Performance in UK Manufacturing Industry, 1963 and 1968’, Economic Journal, 88, 107120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, S. (1975), Domestic Monetary Management in Britain, 1919–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huberman, M. (1991), ‘Industrial Relations and the Industrial Revolution: Evidence from M’Connel and Kennedy, 1810–1840’, Business History Review, 65, 345378.Google Scholar
Hulten, C. (1978), ‘Growth Accounting with Intermediate Inputs’, Review of Economic Studies, 45, 511518.Google Scholar
Independent Commission on Banking (2011), Final Report. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Irving, R. J. (1976), The North-Eastern Railway Company. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, D. A. (2001), ‘Tariffs and Growth in Late Nineteenth-Century America’, The World Economy, 24, 1530.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2009), ‘Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century’, World Politics, 61, 438486.Google Scholar
Janossy, F. (1969), The End of the Economic Miracle. White Plains, NY: IASP.Google Scholar
Jerzmanowski, M. (2007), ‘Total Factor Productivity Differences: Appropriate Technology vs. Efficiency’, European Economic Review, 51, 20802110.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (1987), Wages and Employment Policy, 1936–1985. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kamps, C. (2005), ‘Is There a Lack of Public Capital in the European Union?EIB Papers, 10(1), 7393.Google Scholar
Kanefsky, J. (1979), ‘The Diffusion of Power Technology in British Industry’. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, D. and Morris, P. (1994), ‘The Rise and Fall of Consensus Politics’, in Kavanagh, D. and Morris, P. (eds.), Consensus Politics from Attlee to Major. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–22.Google Scholar
Kendrick, J. W. (1961), Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. P. (1987), Industrial Structure, Capital Markets and the Origins of British Industrial Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, M. A. and Fullerton, D. (1984), The Taxation of Income from Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, M. A. and Robson, M. H. (1993), ‘United Kingdom’, in Jorgenson, D. W. and Landau, R. (eds.), Tax Reform and the Cost of Capital. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 300–332.Google Scholar
Kitson, M. and Solomou, S. (1990), Protectionism and Economic Revival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitson, M., Solomou, S. and Weale, M. (1991), ‘Effective Protection and Economic Recovery in the United Kingdom During the 1930s’, Economic History Review, 44, 328338.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1966), Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure, and Spread. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. (1998), The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Lazonick, W. (1994), ‘Employment Relations in Manufacturing and International Competition’, in Floud, R. C. and McCloskey, D. N. (eds.), The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90116.Google Scholar
Lee, C. H. (1979), British Regional Employment Statistics, 1841–1971. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leunig, T. (2001), ‘New Answers to Old Questions: Explaining the Slow Adoption of Ring Spinning in Lancashire, 1890–1913’, Journal of Economic History, 61, 439466.Google Scholar
Lewchuk, W. (1987), American Technology and the British Vehicle Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G., Bekar, C. and Carlaw, K. (1998), ‘The Consequences of Changes in GPTs’, in Helpman, E. (ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 193218.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. (1987), ‘The Government and Industrial Relations, 1919–39’, in Wrigley, C. (ed.), A History of British Industrial Relations, vol. 2, 19141939. Brighton: Harvester Press, 185210.Google Scholar
Lupton, T. (1963), On the Shop Floor. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Macallan, C., Millard, S. and Parker, M. (2008), ‘The Cyclicality of Mark-ups and Profit Margins for the United Kingdom: Some New Evidence’, Bank of England Working Paper No. 351.Google Scholar
Machin, S. and Wadhwani, S. (1989), ‘The Effects of Unions on Organisational Change, Investment and Employment: Evidence from WIRS Data’, London School of Economics Centre for Labour Economics Discussion Paper No. 355.Google Scholar
Macmillan, H. (1938), The Middle Way. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1992), ‘A Long-Run Perspective on Saving’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 181196.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1996), ‘Macroeconomic Accounts for European Countries’, in van Ark, B. and Crafts, N. (eds.), Quantitative Aspects of Postwar European Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2783.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (2010), Historical Statistics of the World Economy, 1-2008AD. www.ggdc.net/maddisonGoogle Scholar
Magee, G. (2004), ‘Manufacturing and Technological Change’, in Floud, R. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7498.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. C. O., Feinstein, C. H. and Odling-Smee, J. C. (1982), British Economic Growth 1856-1973. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (1970), ‘Did Victorian Britain Fail?Economic History Review, 23, 446459.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (1981), ‘The Industrial Revolution: A Survey’, in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D. N. (eds.), The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103127.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. and Sandberg, L. G. (1971), ‘From Damnation to Redemption: Judgments on the Late Victorian Entrepreneur’, Explorations in Economic History, 9, 89108.Google Scholar
McKinlay, A. and Zeitlin, J. (1989), ‘The Meanings of Managerial Prerogative: Industrial Relations and the Organisation of Work in British Engineering, 1880–1939’, Business History, 31, 3247.Google Scholar
Meeks, G. (1977), Disappointing Marriage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, H. (1995), Constructing a Competitive Order: The Hidden History of British Antitrust Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Metcalf, D. (2005), ‘Trade Unions: Resurgence or Perdition?’ in Fernie, S. and Metcalf, D. (eds.), Trade Unions: Resurgence or Demise? Abingdon: Routledge, 83117.Google Scholar
Middleton, R. (1996), Government Versus the Market. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Miles, D. (1993), ‘Testing for Short-Termism in the UK Stock Market’, Economic Journal, 103, 13791396.Google Scholar
Miles, D., Yang, J. and Marcheggiano, G. (2013), ‘Optimal Bank Capital’, Economic Journal, 123, 137.Google Scholar
Mills, T. C. (1991), ‘Are Output Fluctuations in the UK Transitory or Permanent?The Manchester School, 59, 111.Google Scholar
Mills, T. C. and Crafts, N. (2000), ‘After the Golden Age: A Long-Run Perspective on Growth Rates that Speeded Up, Slowed Down, and Still Differ’, The Manchester School, 68, 6891.Google Scholar
Millward, R. (1997), ‘The 1940s Nationalizations in Britain: Means to an End or the Means of Production?Economic History Review, 50, 209234.Google Scholar
Mitch, D. (1999), ‘The Role of Education and Skill in the Industrial Revolution’, in Mokyr, J. (ed.), The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective. Oxford: Westview Press, 241279.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1988), British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1990), The Lever of Riches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2002), The Gifts of Athena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2009), The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain 1700–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. D. and Martin, D. (1975), ‘Tariff Reductions and UK Imports of Manufactures, 1955–1971’, National Institute Economic Review, 72, 3854.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (1998), ‘The Stock Market and Problems of Corporate Control in the United Kingdom’, in Buxton, T., Chapman, P. and Temple, P. (eds.), Britain’s Economic Performance, 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 200252.Google Scholar
Morris, D. J. and Stout, D. (1985), ‘Industrial Policy’, in Morris, D. J. (ed.), The Economic System in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 851894.Google Scholar
Morrisson, C. and Murtin, F. (2009), ‘The Century of Education’, Journal of Human Capital, 3, 142.Google Scholar
Mosley, P. (1984), The Making of Economic Policy: Theory and Evidence from Britain and the United States Since 1945. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N. (2000), ‘Twentieth Century Technological Change’, in Engerman, S. L. and Gallmann, R. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 803925.Google Scholar
Murray, J. (2014), ‘Output Gap Measurement: Judgement and Uncertainty’, Office for Budget Responsibility Working Paper No. 5.Google Scholar
NEDO (1976), A Study of UK Nationalised Industries. London: HMSO (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Wright, G. (1992), ‘The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective’, Journal of Economic Literature 30, 19311964.Google Scholar
Newbould, G. D. (1970), Management and Merger Activity. Liverpool: Guthstead.Google Scholar
Nicholas, T. (2010), ‘The Role of Independent Invention in U.S. Technological Development, 1880–1930’, Journal of Economic History, 70, 5782.Google Scholar
Nicholas, T. (2011), ‘Independent Invention During the Rise of the Corporate Economy in Britain and Japan’, Economic History Review, 64, 9951023.Google Scholar
Nickell, S. J. (1996), ‘Competition and Corporate Performance’, Journal of Political Economy, 104, 724746.Google Scholar
Nickell, S. J., Nicolitsas, D. and Dryden, N. (1997), ‘What Makes Firms Perform Well?European Economic Review, 41, 783796.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, G. and Scarpetta, S. (2003), ‘Regulation, Productivity and Growth’, Economic Policy, 36, 972.Google Scholar
Niemi, A. W. (1974), State and Regional Patterns in American Manufacturing, 1860–1900. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (1972), ‘The Recent Productivity Slowdown’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 493531.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nyman, S. and Silberston, A. (1978), ‘The Ownership and Control of Industry’, Oxford Economic Papers, 30, 74101.Google Scholar
O’Brien, P. K. (1996), ‘Path Dependency, or Why Britain Became an Industrialized and Urbanized Economy Long Before France’, Economic History Review, 49, 213249.Google Scholar
OECD (1991), Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, M. (1999), Britain’s Productivity Performance, 1950–1996. London: NIESR.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, K. H. (1997), ‘The European Grain Invasion’, Journal of Economic History, 57, 775801.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, K. H. and Williamson, J. G. (2002), ‘When Did Globalization Begin?European Review of Economic History, 6, 2350.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. (2012), ‘Long-Term Implications of the ICT Revolution: Applying the Lessons of Growth Theory and Growth Accounting’, Economic Modelling, 29, 17221736.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. (2013), ‘Has the Growth of Real GDP in the UK been Overstated Because of Mismeasurement of Banking Output?National Institute Economic Review, 224, R59R65.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. and Sebastia-Barriel, M. (2017), ‘Effects of Financial Crises on Productivity, Capital and Employment’, Review of Income and Wealth, 63, S90S112.Google Scholar
Owens, J. and Whitehouse, E. (1996), ‘Tax Reform for the 21st Century’, Bulletin of International Fiscal Documentation, 50, 538547.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., Sahin, A., Topa, G. and Violante, G. L. (2016), ‘Working Hard in the Wrong Place: A Mismatch-Based Explanation to the UK Productivity Puzzle’, European Economic Review, 84, 4256.Google Scholar
Phelps Brown, E. H. (1983), The Origins of Trade Union Power. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trust, Pilgrim (1938), Men Without Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1989), Britain’s Prime and Britain’s Decline: The British Economy, 1870–1914. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1992), The Development of the British Economy, 1914–1990. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Prais, S. J. (1981), Productivity and Industrial Structure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pratten, C. F. (1976), Labour Productivity Differentials Within International Companies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pratten, C. F. and Atkinson, A. G. (1976), ‘The Use of Manpower in British Industry’, Department of Employment Gazette, 84, 571576.Google Scholar
Price, S. and Sanders, D. (1993), ‘Modeling Government Popularity in Postwar Britain: A Methodological Example’, American Journal of Political Science, 37, 317334.Google Scholar
Proudman, J. and Redding, S. (1998), ‘A Summary of the Openness and Growth Project’, in Proudman, J. and Redding, S. (eds.), Openness and Growth. London: Bank of England, 129.Google Scholar
Radice, H. (1971), ‘Control Type, Profitability and Growth in Large Firms: An Empirical Study’, Economic Journal, 81, 547562.Google Scholar
Reinhart, C. M. and Rogoff, K. S. (2014), ‘Recovery from Financial Crises: Evidence from 100 Episodes’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 104(5), 5055.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. W. (1965), ‘Over-Commitment in Britain Before 1930’, Oxford Economic Papers, 17, 237262.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. W. (1967), Economic Recovery in Britain, 1932–1939. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Ristuccia, C. A. and Solomou, S. (2014), ‘Can General Purpose Technology Theory Explain Economic Growth? Electrical Power as a Case Study’, European Review of Economic History, 18, 227247.Google Scholar
Rollings, N. (2007), British Business in the Formative Years of European Integration, 1945–1973. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Root, H. (1991), ‘The Redistributive Role of Government Economic Regulation in Old Regime France and England’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 33, 338369.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, W. D. (1987), Elites and the Wealthy in Modern British History, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. W. (1992), ‘The Structure of Wealth-Holding in Britain, 1809–39: A Preliminary Anatomy’, Historical Research, 65, 74–89.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. (1996), ‘Economic Performance, Management Competence and the Outcome of the Next General Election’, Political Studies, 44, 203231.Google Scholar
Sanderson, M. (1988), ‘Education and Economic Decline, 1890-1980s’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4(1), 3850.Google Scholar
Schularick, M. and Solomou, S. (2011), ‘Tariffs and Economic Growth in the First Era of Globalization’, Journal of Economic Growth, 16, 3370.Google Scholar
Scott, P. (2002), ‘Towards the “Cult of the Equity”? Insurance Companies and the Interwar Capital Market’, Economic History Review, 55, 78104.Google Scholar
Scott, P. and Walsh, P. (2005), ‘New Manufacturing Plant Formation, Clustering and Locational Externalities in 1930s Britain’, Business History, 47, 190218.Google Scholar
Sefton, J. and Weale, M. (1995), Reconciliation of National Income and Expenditure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw-Taylor, L. (2009), ‘The Occupational Structure of England and Wales, 1750–1871: A Preliminary Report’, Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure Occupations Project Paper No. 19.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. (1998), ‘State Versus Private Ownership’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133150.Google Scholar
Short, H. and Keasey, K. (2005), ‘Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Governance in the UK’, in Keasey, K., Thompson, S. and Wright, M. (eds.), Corporate Governance: Accountability, Enterprise and International Comparisons. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 6195.Google Scholar
Singh, A. (1975), ‘Takeovers, Natural Selection and the Theory of the Firm’, Economic Journal, 85, 497515.Google Scholar
Solomou, S. and Weale, M. (1991), ‘Balanced Estimates of UK GDP, 1870–1913’, Explorations in Economic History, 28, 5463.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R. J. (1994), ‘Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in Britain and Ireland, 1852–1876’, Economica, 61, 3758.Google Scholar
Sumner, M. (1999), ‘Long-Run Effects of Investment Incentives’, in Driver, C. and Temple, P. (eds.), Investment, Growth and Employment: Perspectives for Policy. London: Routledge, 292300.Google Scholar
Supple, B. E. (1987), History of the British Coal Industry, vol. 4, 1913–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Symeonidis, G. (2008), ‘The Effects of Competition on Wages and Productivity: Evidence from the United Kingdom’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 134146.Google Scholar
Tanzi, V. (1969), The Individual Income Tax and Economic Growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Temin, P. (2002), ‘The Golden Age of European Growth Reconsidered’, European Review of Economic History, 6, 322.Google Scholar
Temin, P. and Voth, H. J. (2013), Prometheus Shackled. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tena-Junguito, A. (2010), ‘Bairoch Revisited: Tariff Structure and Growth in the Late Nineteenth Century’, European Review of Economic History, 14, 111143.Google Scholar
The Conference Board (2016), Total Economy Database. www.conference-board.org/data/economy/database/Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1983), ‘Rearmament and Economic Recovery in the Late 1930s’, Economic History Review, 36, 552579.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1984), ‘An Input-Output Approach to the British Economy, 1890–1914’, D Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1988), ‘Slowdown in the Pre-World War One Economy’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4(1), 1424.Google Scholar
Tolliday, S. (1987), Business, Banking and Politics: The Case of British Steel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, J. (1996), ‘Inventing “Decline”: The Falling Behind of the British Economy in the Postwar Years’, Economic History Review, 49, 731757.Google Scholar
Toms, S., Wilson, N. and Wright, M. (2015), ‘The Evolution of Private Equity: Corporate Restructuring in the UK, c. 1945–2010’, Business History, 57, 736768.Google Scholar
van Ark, B. (2011), ‘Up the Hill and Down Again: A History of Europe’s Productivity Gap Relative to the United States, 1950–2009’, Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2, 2756.Google Scholar
van Ark, B., Hao, J. X., Corrado, C. and Hulten, C. (2009), ‘Measuring Intangible Capital and Its Contribution to Economic Growth in Europe’, EIB Papers, 14(1), 6393.Google Scholar
Van Reenen, J. (2013), ‘Productivity Under the 1997–2010 Labour Government’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29, 113141.Google Scholar
Verspagen, B. (1996), ‘Technology Indicators and Economic Growth in the European Area: Some Empirical Evidence’, in van Ark, B. and Crafts, N. (eds.), Quantitative Aspects of Postwar European Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 215243.Google Scholar
Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1988), Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Von Tunzelmann, G. N. (1978), Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Voth, H.-J. (2001), ‘The Longest Years: New Estimates of Labor Input in England, 1760–1830’, Journal of Economic History, 61, 10651082.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. and Dollery, B. (1999), Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wallis, P. (2014), ‘Labour Markets and Training’, in Floud, R., Humphries, J. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Vol. 1: 1700–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 178210.Google Scholar
Warwick, K. (2013), ‘Beyond Industrial Policy’, OECD STI Policy Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
Woessmann, L. (2016), ‘The Importance of School Systems: Evidence from International Differences in Student Achievement’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 332.Google Scholar
Woltjer, P. J. (2013), ‘Taking Over: a New US/UK Productivity Benchmark and the Nature of American Leadership c. 1910’, Groningen Growth and Development Centre Research Memorandum No. 140.Google Scholar
Wren, C. (1996a), ‘Grant-Equivalent Expenditure on Industrial Subsidies in the Postwar United Kingdom’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58, 317353.Google Scholar
Wren, C. (1996b), Industrial Subsidies: the UK Experience. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wren, C. (2001), ‘The Industrial Policy of Competitiveness: A Review of Recent Developments in the UK’, Regional Studies, 35, 847860.Google Scholar
Wrigley, C. (2002), British Trade Unions Since 1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zweig, F. (1951), Productivity and Trade Unions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Nicholas Crafts, University of Warwick
  • Book: Forging Ahead, Falling Behind and Fighting Back
  • Online publication: 04 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108334907.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Nicholas Crafts, University of Warwick
  • Book: Forging Ahead, Falling Behind and Fighting Back
  • Online publication: 04 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108334907.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Nicholas Crafts, University of Warwick
  • Book: Forging Ahead, Falling Behind and Fighting Back
  • Online publication: 04 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108334907.008
Available formats
×