Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:16:58.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Borderlands of Independent India

Transition, Violence, and Justice

from Part I - The Past as the Memory of the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2019

Nergis Canefe
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

When the British left India, they left the country in ruins. The mutual killings had started in 1946 in Kolkata with the infamous Great Calcutta Riot. The riot left an estimated 10,000–15,000 dead in five days and 200,000 displaced. The government had to call the army to quell the riot, and this became the pattern both in the Punjab and Bengal. As the hour of independence approached, communities attacked each other in the entire northern, western, and eastern parts of the country. Acts of killing, burning, ransacking, rape, looting, maiming, and displacing spread like wildfire. The army had to be rushed to several places. What did independence mean, what was signified by freedom, and what was political power to be used for? What was sovereignty? If people were sovereign, did this mean Hindus exercising sovereignty over everyone else, or Muslims, or autonomous regions? What did the term ‘nation’ actually mean when everyone was talking of the nation gaining sovereignty, all at the same time? For the British, the main thing was getting out of India as quickly as possible and until then maintaining the minimum of law and order.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transitional Justice and Forced Migration
Critical Perspectives from the Global South
, pp. 9 - 32
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aditya, Anand, Upreti, Bishnu Raj, and Kanta Adhikary, Poorna. Countries in Conflict and Processing of Peace: Lessons for Nepal. Kathmandu: Friends for Peace, 2006.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Ishtiaq. The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed: Unravelling the 1947 Tragedy through Secret British Reports and First-Person Accounts. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Paula. ‘Aliens in a Colonial World’. In Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India, 1947–2003, ed. Samaddar, R., 69105. New Delhi: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Paula. ‘Circles of Insecurity’. In Migration and Circles of Insecurity, ed. Sammaddar, R. and Banerjee, Paula, 70122. New Delhi: Rupa & Co, 2010.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, Prasant, Khwaja, Asim, and Mian, Atif. ‘The Big March: Migratory Flows after the Partition of India’. Economic & Political Weekly 43, no. 45 (30 August 2008): 3949.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R.The Partition of India and Retributive Justice in the Punjab, 1946–47: Means, Methods, and Purposes’. Journal of Genocide Research 5, no. 1 (2003): 71101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, J.Rights or Charity? Government and Refugees: The Debate over Relief and Rehabilitation in West Bengal, 1947–1950’. In Partitions of Memory, ed. Kaul, S., 74110. Delhi: Permanent Black, 2001.Google Scholar
Chimni, B.S.Status of Refugees in India: Strategic Ambiguity’. In Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India, 1947–2003, ed. Samaddar, R., 443–71. New Delhi: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
Dahal, Nir Prasad. ‘Rethinking Nepal’s IDP Policy with reference to UN Guiding Principles’. Refugee Watch Online, 31 March 2011, http://refugeewatchonline.blogspot.in/2011/03/rethinking-nepals-idp-policy-with.html.Google Scholar
Das, Samir K.In Search of a Community – The Immigrant Muslims of Contemporary Assam’. In Dimensions of Displaced People in Northeast India, ed. Thomas, C.J., 347–63. New Delhi: Regency Publications, 2002.Google Scholar
Das, Samir K.State Response to the Refugee Crisis: Relief and Rehabilitation in the East’. In Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India, 1947–2003, ed. Samaddar, R., 1134. New Delhi: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
Kaur, Ravinder. Since 1947: Partition Narratives among Punjabi Migrants of Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Khan, Nichola. Mohajir Militancy in Pakistan: Violence and Transformation in the Karachi Conflict. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Nail, Thomas. The Figure of the Migrant. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, R.Birth of Social Security Commitments: What Happened in the West’. In Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India, 1947–2003, ed. Samaddar, R.. New Delhi: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
Mishra, Omprakash, ed. Forced Migration in the South Asian Region: Displacement, Human Rights, and Conflict Resolution. New Delhi: Centre for Refugee Studies, Jadavpur University, Brookings Institution, and Manak Publications, 2004.Google Scholar
Oberoi, Pia. Exile and Belonging: Refugees and State Policy in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rahman, Md. Mahbubar and Van Schendel, Willem. ‘“I am not a Refugee” – Rethinking Partition Migration’. Modern Asian Studies 37, no. 3 (2003): 551–84.Google Scholar
Samaddar, Ranabir. The Politics of Dialogue: Living under the Geopolitical Histories of War and Peace. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Samaddar, Ranabir. ‘The Justice-Seeking Subject’. In The Borders of Justice, ed. Balibar, Etienne, Mezzadra, Sandro and Samaddar, R., 145–66. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Samaddar, Ranabir, ‘Government of Peace’. In Government of Peace: Social Governance, Security, and the Problematic of Peace, ed. Samaddar, R., 1956. Surrey, Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, A.R. Partition and the Making of the Mohajir Mindset: A Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Singh, Anita Inder. The Partition of India. Delhi: National Book Trust, 2006.Google Scholar
Van Schendel, Willem. ‘Working through Partition – Making a Living in the Bengal Borderlands’. International Review of Social History 46 (2000): 393421.Google Scholar
Van Schendel, Willem. ‘Stateless in South Asia – The Making of India-Bangladesh Enclaves’. The Journal of Asian Studies 61, no. 1 (2002): 115–47.Google Scholar
Van Schendel, Willem. Bengal Borderlands: Beyond State and Nation in South Asia. London: Anthem Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Voices of the Internally Displaced in South Asia, A Calcutta Research Group Report, 2006, www.mcrg.ac.in/Voices.pdfGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×