Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 222–226 (Interpretation of treaties in more than one language) and 293–295 (Correction of errors).Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni, and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, ‘Article 79: Correction of error in texts or in certified copies of treaties’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1770–1796.Google Scholar

Ouguergouz, Fatsah, Villalpando, Santiago, and Morgan-Foster, Jason, ‘Article 77: Functions of depositaries’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1715–1753.Google Scholar

Papaux, Alain, and Samson, Rémi, ‘Article 33: Interpretation of treaties authenticated in two or more languages’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 866–884.Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 16–17, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 147–152 (Plurilingual treaties).Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 38–62 (Original text).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 450–462 (Article 33) and pp. 955–969 (Article 79).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 89–92 (Signature) and 107–109 (Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty prior to its entry into force).Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, La Rosa, Anne-Marie and Mbengue, Makane Moïse, ‘Article 18: Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty prior to its entry into force’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 369–403.Google Scholar

Bradley, Curtis A., ‘Treaty Signature’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 208–219.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni, and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, ‘Participation in the Geneva Conventions (1864–1949) and the Additional Protocols of 1977’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1984, pp. 803–812.Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 22–24, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 29–44 (The conclusion and entry into force of treaties).Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 101–119 (Full powers and signatures).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 132–146 (Article 7) and 242–253 (Article 18).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 95–100 (Ratification), 114–144 (Reservations) and 283–296 (The depositary).Google Scholar

Boudreault, Lise S., ‘Les réserves apportées au Protocole additionnel I aux Conventions de Genève sur le droit humanitaire’, Revue québécoise de droit international, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1989–90, pp. 105–119, at 108–112.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni, and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Pilloud, Claude, ‘Reservations to the Geneva Conventions of 1949’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 16, No. 180, March 1976, pp. 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pilloud, Claude ‘Reservations to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (II)’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 16, No. 181, April 1976, pp. 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reuter, Paul, Introduction to the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 1995, pp. 77–84 (Reservations).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 29–30, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 39–42 (Expression of consent to be bound by a treaty) and 51–82 (Reservations).Google Scholar

Swaine, Edward T., ‘Treaty Reservations’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 277–301.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 120–133 (Deposit of binding instruments).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, ‘Article 24: Entry into force’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 628–637.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 145–158 (Entry into force) and 289–291 (Functions of the depositary).Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, Introduction to the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 1995, pp. 66–68 (Entry into force).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 13–14, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 44–47 (Entry into force).Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 221–247 (Entry into force).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 339–348 (Article 24).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ardault, Karine and Dormoy, Daniel, ‘Article 40: Amendment of multilateral treaties’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 978–984.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 192–204 (successive treaties) and 232–244 (amendment).Google Scholar

Benvenuti, Paolo, ‘Relationship with Prior and Subsequent Treaties and Conventions’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 689–700.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, ‘Treaty Amendments’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 347–366.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, François, ‘Article 59: Termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty implied by conclusion of a later treaty’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1325–1347.Google Scholar

ILC, Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its eighteenth session, in 1966, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission's report covering the work of that session (para. 38); see also Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1966, Vol. II, pp. 187–274.Google Scholar

Rigaux, Anne and Simon, Denys, ‘Article 41: Agreement to modify multilateral treaties between certain parties only’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 986–1008.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 101–103 (Accession) and 320–340 (Succession to treaties).Google Scholar

Caflisch, Lucius and Gamma, Serge, ‘La Suisse, dépositaire des Conventions de Genève’, Allgemeine schweizerische Militärzeitschrift, Vol. 165, No. 3, 1999, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 8th edition, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 423–444 (Succession to rights and duties).Google Scholar

Daillier, Patrick, Forteau, Mathias, Pellet, Alain, Müller, Daniel and Nguyen, Quoc Dinh, Droit international public, 8th edition, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ), Paris, 2009, pp. 599–619 (State succession).Google Scholar

David, Eric, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 5th edition, Bruylant, Brussels, 2012.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni, and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard and Novak, Gregor, ‘State Succession in Respect of Treaties’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 396–427.Google Scholar

Kamminga, Menno T., ‘State Succession in Respect of Human Rights Treaties’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1996, pp. 469–484.Google Scholar

Rasulov, Akbar, ‘Revisiting State Succession to Humanitarian Treaties: Is There a Case for Automaticity?’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2003, pp. 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, ‘Participation in the Geneva Conventions (1864–1949) and the Additional Protocols of 1977’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 803–812.Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, p. 30, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, p. 42 (Accession).Google Scholar

Stern, Brigitte, ‘La succession d’États’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye, Vol. 262, 1996, pp. 9–438, at 176–190.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas, ‘State Succession in Treaties’, version of November 2006, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Andreas and Devaney, James G., ‘Succession to treaties and the inherent limits of international law’, in Tams, Christian J., Tzanakopoulos, Antonios and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014, pp. 505–540.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Bruno, ‘La succession d’états et les Conventions de Genève’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l'honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1984, pp. 113–123.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 101–103 (Accession) and 289–293 (Functions of the depositary).Google Scholar

Daillier, Patrick, Forteau, Mathias, Pellet, Alain, Müller, Daniel and Nguyen, Quoc Dinh, Droit international public, 8th edition, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ), Paris, 2009, pp. 599–619 (State succession).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 18–19, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 934–954 (Article 77).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Ouguergouz, Fatsah, Villalpando, Santiago and Morgan-Foster, Jason, ‘Article 77: Functions of depositaries’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1715–1753.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 934–946 (Article 77).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The specificities of humanitarian law’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984, pp. 265–280.Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 245–272 (Duration and termination).Google Scholar

Bannelier, Karine, ‘Article 43: Obligations imposed by international law independently of a treaty’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1031–1043.Google Scholar

Bernstorff, Jochen von, ‘Martens Clause’, version of December 2009, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldemar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1982, p. 44.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 7th edition, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2000, pp. 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conférence internationale de la paix, The Hague, 18 May–29 July 1899, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague, Imprimerie nationale, 1899, Sommaire général, – Première partie, – Troisième partie (Deuxième Commission).Google Scholar

Crawford, Emily, ‘The Modern Relevance of the Martens Clause’, Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 11/27, 2011, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Distefano, Giovanni and Henry, Etienne, ‘Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 155–188.Google Scholar

Empell, Hans-Michael, ‘Die Martens'sche Klausel – grundlegende Norm des humanitären Völkerrechts oder Vorschrift ohne Wert?’, Humanitäres Völkerrecht – Informationsschriften, Vol. 22, 2009, pp. 145–153.Google Scholar

Graditsky, Thomas, ‘Bref retour sur l'origine de la clause de Martens: Une contribution belge méconnue’, in Grignon, Julia (ed.), Hommage à Jean Pictet par le Concours de droit international humanitaire Jean-Pictet, Editions Blais, Yvon, Cowansville and Schulthess Editions Romandes, Geneva, 2016.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Historical Development and Legal Basis’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, La bonne foi en droit international public, Publications de l'Institut universitaire de hautes études internationales, Geneva, 2000, pp. 1770–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meron, Theodor, ‘The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No. 1, January 2000, pp. 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyrowitz, Henry, ‘Réflexions sur le fondement du droit de la guerre’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l'honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984, pp. 419–431.Google Scholar

Miyazaki, Shigeki, ‘The Martens Clause and International Humanitarian Law’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984, pp. 433–444.Google Scholar

Münch, Fritz, ‘Die Martens'sche Klausel und die Grundlagen des Völkerrechts’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 36, 1976, pp. 347–373.Google Scholar

Nishimura Hayashi, Mika, ‘The Martens Clause and Military Necessity’, in Hensel, Howard M. (ed.), The Legitimate Use of Military Force – The Just War Tradition and the Customary Law of Armed Conflict, Ashgate, Aldershot, 2008, pp. 135–159.Google Scholar

Pustogarov, Vladimir V., ‘The Martens Clause in International Law’, Journal of the History of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1999, pp. 125–135.Google Scholar

Rensmann, Thilo, ‘Die Humanisierung des Völkerrechts durch das ius in bello – Von der Martens'schen Klausel zur “Responsibility to Protect”’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2008, pp. 111–128.Google Scholar

Salter, Michael, ‘Reinterpreting Competing Interpretations of the Scope and Potential of the Martens Clause’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2012, pp. 403–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, p. 14, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

Schircks, Rhea, Die Martens'sche Klausel, Rezeption und Rechtsqualität, Dissertation, University of Zurich, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2002.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Manchester University Press, 1984, pp. 181–194 (Termination and suspension of operation of treaties).Google Scholar

Sperduti, Giuseppe, Lezioni di diritto internazionale, Giuffrè, Milan, 1958, pp. 68–74.Google Scholar

Spieker, Heike, ‘Martens Klausel’, Humanitäres Völkerrecht – Informationsschriften, Vol. 1, 1988, p. 46.Google Scholar

Thürer, Daniel, International Humanitarian Law: Theory, Practice, Context, Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law, 2011, pp. 398–402.Google Scholar

Ticehurst, Rupert, ‘The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 37, No. 317, April 1997, pp. 125–134.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section, Summary of practice of the Secretary-General as depositary of multilateral treaties, UN Doc. ST/LEG/7/Rev.l, United Nations, New York, 1999, paras 259–262 (Suspension, termination).Google Scholar

Veuthey, Michel, ‘Public Conscience in International Humanitarian Law Today’, in Fischer, Horst, Froissart, Ulrike, von Heinegg, Wolff Heintschel and Raap, Christian (eds), Krisensicherung und Humanitärer Schutz – Crisis Management and Humanitarian Protection, Festschrift für Dieter Fleck, Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2004, pp. 611–642.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 681–689 (Article 54).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 297–307 (Registration and publication).Google Scholar

Hinojal-Oyarbide, Arancha and Rosenboom, Annebeth, ‘Managing the Process of Treaty Formation – Depositaries and Registration’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 248–276.Google Scholar

Jacqué, Jean-Paul, in Cot, Jean-Pierre and Pellet, Alain (eds), La Charte des Nations Unies. Commentaire article par article, Article 102, Vol. II, Economica, Paris, 2005, pp. 2117–2132.Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, ‘Article 80: Registration and publication of treaties’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1797–1805.Google Scholar

Martens, Ernst, ‘Article 102’, in Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg and Paulus, Andreas (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, Vol. II, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 2089–2109.Google Scholar

Ouguergouz, Fatsah, Villalpando, Santiago and Morgan-Foster, Jason, ‘Article 77: Functions of depositaries’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1715–1753, at 1748–1750.Google Scholar

Reuter, Paul, Introduction to the Law of Treaties, 2nd edition, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 1995, pp. 70–71 (Registration and publication).Google Scholar

Schenker, Claude, Practice Guide to International Treaties, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Bern, 2015, pp. 37–40, available at https://www.fdfa.admin.ch/treaties.Google Scholar

United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Handbook, Revised edition, 2012, pp. 29–38.Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2009, pp. 944 (Article 77) and 970–976 (Article 80).Google Scholar