Book contents
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation Policy and Innovation Systems
- 1 Moving Forward in Sectoral Systems Research
- 2 Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect R&D Support
- 3 From Market Fixing to Market Creating
- 4 Strategic Alliances
- Part II Innovation in Developing and Emerging Countries
- Part III Regional Innovation Systems and Policies
- Part IV Innovation Management and its Links with Policy
- Index
- References
1 - Moving Forward in Sectoral Systems Research
Taxonomies, Evolution and Modelling
from Part I - Innovation Policy and Innovation Systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation Policy and Innovation Systems
- 1 Moving Forward in Sectoral Systems Research
- 2 Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect R&D Support
- 3 From Market Fixing to Market Creating
- 4 Strategic Alliances
- Part II Innovation in Developing and Emerging Countries
- Part III Regional Innovation Systems and Policies
- Part IV Innovation Management and its Links with Policy
- Index
- References
Summary
Research on sectoral systems of innovation has progressed significantly in the last decade. Sectoral systems consider sectors as systems and innovation in a sector as the result of the learning, capabilities and strategies of firms and other system components such as non-firm actors and institutions. In a sense, a sectoral system view of innovation puts knowledge, capabilities, systems and institutions at the centre of the analysis.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management , pp. 27 - 52Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Adams, P., Fontana, R. and Malerba, F. 2013. The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: The role of industrial users in semiconductors. Research Policy 42(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Bodas Freitas, I., Castellacci, F., Fontana, R., Malerba, F. and Vezzulli, A. 2016. Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis. Research Policy 46(1): 57–72.Google Scholar
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A. and Tsakanikas, A. 2015. Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship: Exploring a taxonomy based on the AEGIS survey, in Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy, ed. Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M. and Radosevic, S.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castellacci, F. 2007 Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(6): 1105–1145.Google Scholar
Castellacci, F. 2009 The interactions between national systems and sectoral patterns of innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19(3): 321–347.Google Scholar
Castellacci, F. (2008): Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy 37: 978–994.Google Scholar
Castellacci, F. and Zheng, J. 2010. Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm-level productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 19(6): 1829–1865.Google Scholar
Chandy, R. K. and Tellis, G. J. 2000. The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64: 1–17.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly March: 128–152.Google Scholar
Cowan, R., David, P., and Foray, D. 2000. The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness, Industrial and Corporate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9(2), 211–253.Google Scholar
Dodgson, M., Mathews, J., Kastelle, T. and Hu, T. 2008. The evolving nature of Taiwan’s national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks. Research Policy 37(3): 430–445.Google Scholar
Dosi, G. and Nelson, R. 2010. Technological change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, ed. Hall, B. and Rosenberg, N.. New York: Elsevier, 51–127.Google Scholar
Edquist, C. 2003. The Internet and Mobile Telecommunication System of innovation: Development in Equipment, Access and Content. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Edquist, C. 2004. The fixed internet and mobile telecommunication sectoral system of innovation, in Sectoral Systems of Innovation, ed. Malerba, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edquist, C., Malerba, F., Metcalfe, S., Montobbio, F. and Steinmueller, E. 2004. Sectoral systems implications for European innovation policy, in Sectoral Systems of Innovation, ed. Malerba, F.. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fontana, R., Malerba, F. and Marinoni, A. 2015. Mapping sectoral systems of innovation. An empirical analysis of knowledge, in Dynamics of Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship, ed. Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M. and Radosevic, S.. Business Strategy and Public Policy, Albington: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garavaglia, C. Malerba, F. Orsenigo, L. Pezzoni, M. 2012. Technological regimes and demand structure in the evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 22, 4, 677–709Google Scholar
Giachetti, C. and Marchi, G. 2017. Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry. Research Policy 46(2): 362–364.Google Scholar
Gu, S., Lundvall, B.-Å., Liu, J., Malerba, F., and Schwaag Serger, S. 2009. China’s system and vision of innovation: An analysis in relation to the strategic adjustment and the medium- to long-term S&T development plan (2006–20). Industry & Innovation 16: 369–388.Google Scholar
Guennif, S. and Ramani, S. V. 2012. Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework. Research Policy 41: 430–441.Google Scholar
Jacobides, M. 2008. How capabilities differences, transaction costs and learning curves interact to shape vertical scope. Organization Science 19(2): 306–326.Google Scholar
Jacobides, M. and Winter, S. 2005. The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal 26(5): 395–413.Google Scholar
Kang, H. and Song, J. 2017. Innovation and recurring shifts in industrial leadership: Three phases of change and persistence in the camera industry. Research Policy 46(2): 376–387.Google Scholar
Landini, F. and Malerba, F. 2016. Public Policy, Catching Up in Global Industries and Technological Change: A Simulation Model. Milan: Bocconi University.Google Scholar
Lee, K. 2005. Making a technological catch-up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 13(2): 97–131.Google Scholar
Lee, K. 2013. Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-Up: Knowledge, Path Creation and the Middle Income Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, K. and Ki, J., 2017. Rise of latecomers and catch-up cycles in the world steel industry. Research Policy 46(2): 365–375.Google Scholar
Lee, K. and Lim, C., 2001. Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy 30: 459–483.Google Scholar
Lee, K. and Malerba, F. 2017. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46(2): 338–351.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Mani, S. and Mu, Q. 2012. Explaining divergent stories of catch-up in the telecommunication equipment industry in Brazil, China, India, and Korea, in Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation across Sectoral Systems, ed. Malerba, F. and Nelson, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–71.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Lim, C. and Song, W. 2015. Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms. International Journal of Technology Management 29(1–2): 40–63.Google Scholar
Lenzi, C., Bishop, K., Breschi, S., Buenstorf, G., Llerena, P., Mancusi, M. L. and McKelvey, M. 2010. New innovators and knowledge intensive entrepreneurship in European sectoral systems: A field analysis, in Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship and Innovation Systems, ed. Malerba, F.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31: 247–264.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. (ed.). 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Evidence from Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. 2005. Sectoral systems, in Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and Adams, P. 2013. Sectoral systems of innovation, in Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, ed. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. and Phillips, N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183–203.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and Mani, S. 2009. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production in Developing Countries: Actors, Structure and Evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Incorporated.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and Nelson, R. R. 2011. Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: Evidence from six industries. Industrial and Corporate Change 20(6): 1645–1675.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and Nelson, R. R. 2012. Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation across Sectoral Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Incorporated.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. 1997. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 6(1): 86–118.Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2001. Competition and industrial policies in a ‘history friendly’ model of the evolution of the computer industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19(5): 635–664.Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2007. Demand innovation and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17(4): 371–399.Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2008. Public policies and changing boundaries of firms in a ‘history-friendly’ model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industry. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 67(2): 355–380.Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. 2016. Innovation and the Evolution of Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19: 467–488.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. A. 2005. Strategy and the Crystal Cycle. California Management Review 47: 6–31.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M., Orsenigo, L. and Pammolli, F. 2004. Pharmaceutical industry analysed through the lens of a sectoral system of innovation, in Sectoral Systems of Innovation, ed. Malerba, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. 1995. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 25–46.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. 2002. Introduction to the special issue: Change, transformation and development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12(1): 1.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. and Rabellotti, R. 2017. Gradual catch up and enduring leadership in the global wine industry. Research Policy 46(2): 417–430.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. 1999. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P. 2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P. 2013. The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments. Organization Science (1): 58–78.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P. and Brenner, T. 2003. The use of simulations in developing robust knowledge about causal processes: Methodological considerations and an application to industrial evolution, papers on economics and evolution #0303. Jena: Max-Planck-Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 1994. The coevolution of technology, industrial structure and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(1): 47–63.Google Scholar
Pavitt, K. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13: 343–375.Google Scholar
Peneder, M. 2010. Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors. Research Policy 39(3): 323–334.Google Scholar
Perez, C. and Soete, L. 1988. Catching-up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity, in Technical Change and Economic Theory, ed. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L.. London: Pinter Publishers, 458–479.Google Scholar
Shin, J.-S. 2017. Dynamic catch-up strategy, capability expansion and changing windows of opportunity in the memory industry. Research Policy 46(2): 404–416.Google Scholar
Vertesy, D. 2017. Changing leadership in the regional jet industry. Research Policy 46(2): 388–403.Google Scholar
Winter, S. 1987. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets, in The Competitive Challenge – Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, ed. Teece, D.. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger (Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Yu, J., Malerba, F., Adams, P. and Zhang, Y. 2016. Diverging Sectoral Systems in China: Telecommunications Equipment and Semiconductors. Industry and Innovation Forthcoming.Google Scholar