Argentina, and Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas. Nunca más: The Report of the Argentine National Commission on the Disappeared, with an Introduction by Ronald Dworkin. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1986.Google Scholar

Berryman, Phillip, Chile, and Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación. “Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation” (Notre Dame, IN: published in cooperation with the Center for Civil and Human Rights, Notre Dame Law School, by the University of Notre Dame Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Department of State, and Webster, Dan. Mr. Webster to Lord Ashburton, 6th August. 1842. Available at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/br-1842d.asp#web2.Google Scholar

European Parliament and European Council. “Directive 96/9/EC of 11 March 1996 on the Legal Protection of Databases.” 1996.Google Scholar

International Court of Justice. “Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders.” 1951.Google Scholar

International Law Commission. Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. 2001, UN Doc. A/56/10.Google Scholar

International Law Commission. “Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind.” Yearbook of the International Law Commission II:2 (1996).Google Scholar

International Law Commission. Formulation of the Nürnberg Principles. 1950, A/CN.4/L.2.Google Scholar

Library of Congress. Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence: Right to Institute New Government. 2000. Available at www.loc.gov/exhibits/jefferson/jeffdec.html.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Abraham. Gettysburg Address, November 19. 1863. Available at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/gettyb.asp.Google Scholar

Maria Theresia von Österreich. “Constitutio Criminalis Theresiana.” Johann Thomas von Trattner, 1769. Available at https://archive.org/details/ConstitutioCriminalisTheresiana-1768.Google Scholar

The President of the United States. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. NSS02 (2002).Google Scholar

Security Council Report, “UN Sanctions.” Special Research Report, No. 3, November 25 (New York: Security Council Report, 2013). Available at securitycouncilreport.org.Google Scholar

South Africa, Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and Desmond Tutu. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report. Cape Town: Truth and Reconciliation Commission, 1998.Google Scholar

United Nations. Convention on Biological Diversity. Rio de Janeiro, June 5, 1992.Google Scholar

United Nations and Secretary General. “In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All: Report of the Secretary-General.” New York: United Nations, 2005.Google Scholar

United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Agenda 21, Rio Declaration, Forest Principles. New York: United Nations, 1992.Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme. Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. March 22, 1989.Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme. London Guidelines for the Exchange of Information on Chemicals in International Trade. 15/30 (May 25, 1989).Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme. Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (London Amendment). June 29, 1990.Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme, and the Ozone Secretariat. The Montréal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. September 16, 1987.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. Establishment of an International Criminal Court. 1996, A/RES/51/207.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. Formulation of the Principles Recognized in the Charter of the Nurnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal. 1947, GA Res. 177 (II), November 21.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. Khmer Rouge Trials. 2003, UN Doc. A/RES/57/228 B.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Resolution 1803 (XVII). 1962, UN Doc. A/5217.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights. Human Rights Council 2008, A/HRC/8/5.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. 1998 [2002].Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly, and United Nations Security Council. Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations. 2000, UN Doc. A/55/305-S/2000/809.Google Scholar

United Nations Security Council, Resolution 827, 25 May. 1993, S/RES/827.Google Scholar

United Nations Security Council. Resolution 955, 8 November. 1994, S/RES/955.Google Scholar

United Nations Security Council. Resolution 1298, 17 May. 2000, S/RES/1298.Google Scholar

United States, and Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Arms Control and Disarmament Agreements: Texts and Histories of the Negotiations. Washington, DC: United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, 1990.Google Scholar

United States, and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Treaty on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, together with Agreed Statements and Common Understanding Regarding the Treaty. SALT II. Vienna, June 18, 1979.Google Scholar

United States, and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles. INF. Washington, DC, December 8, 1987.Google Scholar

United States, and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms. START I. Moscow, July 31, 1991.Google Scholar

United States Department of Commerce. Proceedings of the Colloquium on the Science Court. Washington, DC: Commerce Technical Advisory Board, 1977.Google Scholar

United States Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1945. The British Commonwealth, the Far East. Vol. VI. US Government Printing Office, 1945.Google Scholar

United States Department of State, and Bureau of Public Affairs. Compliance with SALT I Agreements. Special Report no. 55. July 1979.Google Scholar

World Bank. Adjustment Lending: An Evaluation of Ten Years of Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1988.Google Scholar

Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, International Court of Justice, Advisory opinion of July 22, 2010.Google Scholar

Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Limited, International Court of Justice, 3 (1970).Google Scholar

Case Concerning the Air Service Agreement of 27 March 1946 between the United States of America and France, Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Volume XVIII, pp. 417–493 (1978).Google Scholar

Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo–Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia). Judgment of 25 September 1997, International Court of Justice, (1997).Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua: Nicaragua v. United States of America, International Court of Justice, 1986 I.C.J. 14 (1986).Google Scholar

Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran): Judgment of 24 May 1980. La Haye: Court of International Justice, 1980.Google Scholar

The Case of the S.S. “Lotus” (France v. Turkey), Permanent Court of International Justice, Ser. A, No. 10 (1927).Google Scholar

Doe v. Unocal Corp., US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. 395 F.3d 932 (2002).Google Scholar

European Communities – Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), World Trade Organization, DS26 (2009).Google Scholar

The Factory at Chorzow (Germany v. Poland), Permanent Court of International Justice, Ser. A, No. 17, Sept. 13, 1928.Google Scholar

Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie de Saint-Gobain-Pont-a-Mousson, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, 636 F.2d 1300 (1980).Google Scholar

In Re Yamashita, US Supreme Court, 327 U.S. 1 (1946).Google Scholar

Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines, D.C. Circuit, 731 F.2d 909 (1984).Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinions (2004).Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion of July 8, 1996.Google Scholar

Mc’alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) v. Stevenson, House of Lords, UKHL 100, AC 562 (1932).Google Scholar

The Mox Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, (2005) 126 ILR, vol. 273 (2001).Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić: Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 2 October, ICTY, IT-94-I-AR72 (1995).Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić: Decision on the Defence Motion on Jurisdiction, 10 August, ICTY, IT-94-I-T (1995).Google Scholar

Responsibility of Germany for Damage Caused in the Portuguese Colonies in the South of Africa (Portugal v. Germany), R.I.A.A., 2, 1011 (1928).Google Scholar

Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others against the Netherlands, European Court of Human Rights, 65542/12 (2013).Google Scholar

Trail Smelter Case (United States, Canada), Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Volume III, pp. 1905–1982 (1938 and 1941).Google Scholar

United States – Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations,” World Trade Organization, DS108 (2006).Google Scholar

United States v. Aluminum Co. of America et al., Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 148 F.2d 416 (1945).Google Scholar

United States v. Osborne (in Re Osborne), United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 76 F.3d 306 (1996).Google Scholar

Abraham, Kavi Joseph, and Abramson, Yehonatan. “A Pragmatist Vocation for International Relations: The (Global) Public and Its Problems.” European Journal of International Relations 23:1 (2017), 26–48.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Robert W. The Social Challenge to Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.). International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W., Horkheimer, Max, and Noerr, Gunzelin Schmid. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Aeschylus, . The Orestean Trilogy. Trans. Vellacott, Philip. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1956.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. Die souveräne Macht und das nackte Leben. Trans. Thüring, H.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2002.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. The State of Exception. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Agassi, Joseph. Science in Flux. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akyüz, Yilmaz. “Taming International Finance.” In Managing the Global Economy, edited by Michie, J. and Grieve Smith, J. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, 55–92.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zürn, Michael (eds.) Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics and Differentiation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, Cedermann, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander (eds.). New Systems Theories of World Politics. London: Palgrave, 2010.Google Scholar

Alker, Hayward. Rediscoveries and Reformulations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Alland, Denis. “Countermeasures of General Interest.” European Journal of International Law 13:5 (2002): 1221–1239.Google Scholar

Allison, Graham T. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1971.Google Scholar

Aloisi, Rosa. “A Tale of Two Institutions: The United Nations Security Council and the International Criminal Court.” International Criminal Law Review 13:1 (2013): 147–168.Google Scholar

Alston, Philip G. “Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann.” European Journal of International Law 13:4 (2002): 815–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José E. “Do Liberal States Behave Better?: A Critique of Slaughter’s Liberal Theory.” European Journal of International Law 12:2 (2001): 183–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambos, Kai. “The Crime of Aggression after Kampala.” German Yearbook of International Law 53 (2010): 463–510.Google Scholar

Ambos, Kai. “International Criminal Law at the Crossroads: From ‘Ad Hoc’ Imposition to a Treaty-Based Universal System.” In Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, edited by Stahn, C. and van den Herik, L., The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2010, 161–177.Google Scholar

Ambos, Kai. “Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5:1 (2007): 159–183.Google Scholar

Anders, Günther. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. 2 vols. München: C.H. Beck, 1956 and 1988.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, revised edn. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth. “The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences.” European Journal of International Law 20:2 (2009): 331–358.Google Scholar

Anghie, Anthony. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E.M. Intention, 2nd edn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica, 1485.Google Scholar

Archibald, G.C., Simon, Herbert A., and Samuelson, Paul A.. “Discussion.” The American Economic Review 53:2 (1963): 227–236.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. London: Penguin Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Edited by Beiner, R. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Men in Dark Times. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. “On Humanity in Dark Times: Thoughts about Lessing.” In Men in Dark Times (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973), 11–38.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Cleveland, OH: Meridian, 1958.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . “The Constitution of Athens.” In The Politics, and the Constitution of Athens, edited by Everson, S., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Constitution of Athens. New York: Arno Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by Thomson, J.A.K. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1953.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Thompson, J.A.K.. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1955.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Baltimore: Penguin, 1953.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . “Poetics.” In Aristotle’s Poetics & Rhetoric, edited by Moxon, T.A., London: J.M. Dent and Sons, 1953.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics. Trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Politics. Trans. Sinclair, T.A.. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1962.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . “Prior Analytics.” In The Categories, on Interpretation, and Prior Analytics. Trans. Trendennick, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Rhetoric. Trans. Freese, J.H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar

Assmann, Aleida. Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. München: C.H. Beck, 1999.Google Scholar

Assmann, Jan. “Ancient Egypt and the Materiality of the Sign.” In Materialities of Communication, edited by Gumbrecht, H.U. and Pfeiffer, K.L., Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994, 15–31.Google Scholar

Assmann, Jan. Ma’at: Gerechtigkeit und Unsterblichkeit im alten Ägypten. München: C.H. Beck, 1990.Google Scholar

Assmann, Jan. Religion und Kulturelles Gedächtnis: Zehn Studien. München: Beck, 2000.Google Scholar

Augustus, . Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Trans. Cooley, A.E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Austin, J.L. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah, The Market for Force: The Consequences for Privatizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38:1 (1985): 226–254.Google Scholar

Ayer, A.J. “An Honest Ghost?” In Ryle: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Wood, O. and Pitcher, G., London: Macmillan, 1970, 53–74.Google Scholar

Ayer, A.J.. Language, Truth, and Logic. London: V. Gollancz, 1946.Google Scholar

Azmanova, Albena. The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bac, Mehmet. “Corruption, Connections and Transparency: Does a Better Screen Imply a Better Scene?” Public Choice 107:1/2 (2001): 87–96.Google Scholar

Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S.. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56:4 (1962): 947–952.Google Scholar

Badar, Mohamed Elewa. “Drawing the Boundaries of Mens Rea in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia,” International Criminal Law Review 6:3 (2006): 313–348.Google Scholar

Badescu, Cristina G. Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Security and Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Badian, Ernst. From Plataea to Potidaea: Studies in the History and Historiography of the Pentecontaetia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Baier, Annette. The Cautious, Jealous Virtue: Hume on Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Baier, Annette. A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume’s Treatise, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Baker, John C., O’Connell, Kevin M., and Williamson, Ray A.. Commercial Observation Satellites: At the Leading Edge of Global Transparency. Santa Monica, CA: Rand/ASPRS, 2001.Google Scholar

Baldwin, David A. Economic Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Baldwin, David A.. “Money and Power.” The Journal of Politics 33:3 (1971): 578–614.Google Scholar

Baldwin, David A.. Paradoxes of Power. New York: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Baldwin, David A.. “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies.” World Politics 31:2 (1979): 161–194.Google Scholar

Balint, Jennifer. “Towards the Anti-Genocide Community: The Role of Law.” Australian Journal of Human Rights 1:1 (1994): 12–42.Google Scholar

Balkin, J.M. “How Mass Media Simulate Political Transparency,” Cultural Values 3:4 (1999): 393–413.Google Scholar

Barbato, Mariano. Pilgrimage, Politics and International Relations: Religious Semantics for World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Barbosa, Luiz C. “Save the Rainforest! NGOs and Grassroots Organisations in the Dialectics of Brazilian Amazonia,” International Social Science Journal 55:178 (2003): 583–591.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N. Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Barratt-Brown, Elizabeth P. “Building a Monitoring and Compliance Regime under the Montreal Protocol.” Yale Journal of International Law 16 (1991): 519.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. “Making Sense of Global Civil Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12:3 (2006): 371–395.Google Scholar

Basler, Roy P. (ed.) Abraham Lincoln: His Speeches and Writings. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing, 1946.Google Scholar

Bass, Gary J. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif. The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court: Introduction, Analysis, and Integrated Text of the Statute, Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence. 3 vols. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar

Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. Trans. Glaser, S.F.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bauer, Harry, and Brighi, Elisabetta (eds.). Pragmatism in International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar

Baugh, Daniel A. The Global Seven Years War 1754–1763: Britain and France in a Great Power Contest. London: Pearson, 2011.Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt. “A Natural History of Evil,” available at S.I.M.O.N. (Shoah Intervention Methods Documentation), www.vwi.dc.at/images/Downloads/SWL_Reader/Bauman/SWL-Reader-Bauman.pdf, last accessed May 25, 2016.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine Andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1986.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar

Becker, Carl L. “What Are Historical Facts?” The Western Political Quarterly 8:3 (1955): 327–340.Google Scholar

Becker, Wibke. “#Debatte,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (Meinung), April 24, 2015.Google Scholar

Beiner, Ronald. Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex. The Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., Williams, Paul, and Griffin, Stuart. Understanding Peacekeeping. Cambridge: Polity, 2004.Google Scholar

Benoist, Jocelyn. “A Phenomenology or Pragmatism?” In Pragmatism: Critical Concepts in Philosophy, edited by Goodman, R.B., London: Routledge, 2005, 89–112.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Edited by Burns, J.H., and Hart, H.L.A. London: Athlone, 1970.Google Scholar

Berger, Thomas. War, Guilt and World Politics after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “The Pursuit of the Ideal.” In Berlin, Isaiah, The Proper Study of Humanity: An Anthology of Essays, edited by Hardy, Henry, and Hausheer, Roger, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1998, 1–17.Google Scholar

Bernard, Mitchell, and Ravenhill, John. “Beyond Product Cycles and Flying Geese: Regionalization, Hierarchy, and the Industrialization of East Asia.” World Politics 47:2 (1995): 171–209.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J. The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J.. Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Betts, Richard. “Analysis, War, and Decision: Why Intelligence Failures Are Inevitable.” World Politics 31:2 (1978): 61–89.Google Scholar

Beza, Theodorus. Du Droit des magistrats sur leurs subiets. Saint-Julien-l’Ars: Imprimerie monastique, 1968 [1574].Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd edn. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso, 1986.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea. “Terrorism and Armed Conflict: Insights from a Law & Literature Perspective.” Leiden Journal of International Law 24:1 (2011): 1–21.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas J. “Constructing Historical Counterfactuals to Assess the Consequences of International Regimes: The Global Debt Regime and the Course of the Debt Crisis of the 1980s.” In Regime Theory and International Relations, edited by Rittberger, V. and Mayer, P., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, 315–338.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas J.. Dealing with Debt: International Financial Negotiations and Adjustment Bargaining. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bigo, Didier. “The Möbius Ribbon of Internal and External Security(ies).” In Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory, edited by Albert, M., Jacobson, D., and Lapid, Y., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001, 91–116.Google Scholar

Binder, Guyora. “Representing Nazism: Advocacy and Identity at the Trial of Klaus Barbie.” Yale Law Journal 98:7 (1989): 1321–1383.Google Scholar

Bisset, Alison, Truth Commisssions and Criminal Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Black, Ian, and Cobain, Ian. “British Court Issued Gaza Arrest Warrant for Former Israeli Minister Tzipi Livni,” The Guardian, December 12, 2009.Google Scholar

Bleiker, Roland, and Hutchison, Emma. “Introduction: Emotions and World Politics.” International Theory 6:3 (2014): 490–491.Google Scholar

Bloor, David. “Wittgenstein and the Priority of Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E., London: Routledge, 2001, 95–106.Google Scholar

Bloor, Davis. Wittgenstein: Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Bob, Clifford. “Beyond Transparency: Visibility and Fit in the Internationalization of Internal Conflict.” In Power and Conflict in the Age of Transparency, edited by Finel, B.I. and Lord, K.M., New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000, 287–314.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. The Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited by McRae, K.D., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Bogdan, Attila. “The United States and the International Criminal Court: Avoiding Jurisdiction through Bilateral Agreements in Reliance on Article 98.” International Criminal Law Review 8:1 (2008): 1–54.Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin, and Vetzke, Ingo. “In Whose Name? International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification.” European Journal of International Law 23:1 (2012): 7–41. (An expanded version appeared as a book, Armin Bogdandy, and Ingo Vetzke. In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.)Google Scholar

Bohlen, Avis. “The Rise and Fall of Arms Control.” Survival. 453 (2003): 7–34.Google Scholar

Bondi, Loretta. “Arms Embargo: In Name Only?” In Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft, edited by Cortright, D., and Lopez, G.A., Lanham. MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002, 109–124.Google Scholar

Bosl, Karl, and von Elmenau, Johannes. Mensch und Gesellschaft in der Geschichte Europas. München: Paul List, 1972.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael. “Terrorism and the Legality of Pre-emptive Force.” European Journal of International Law 14:2 (2003): 227–240.Google Scholar

Bottomore, Tom. Sociology as Social Criticism. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. Language and Symbolic Power. Edited by Thompson, J.B. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Sentiment of Honour in Kabyle Society.” In Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society, edited by Péristiany, J.G., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969, 191–241.Google Scholar

Bowen, Howard Rothmann. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper and Row, 1953.Google Scholar

Boyer, Robert, and Drache, Daniel (eds.). States against Markets: The Limits of Globalization. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Boyle, James. “Ideals and Things: International Legal Scholarship and the Prison-House of Language.” Harvard International Law Journal 26:2 (1985): 327–360.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2009.Google Scholar

Bratman, Michael. Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Bratman, Michael. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Bratman, Michael. “Shared Cooperative Activity.” The Philosophical Review 101:2 (1992): 327–341.Google Scholar

Braudel, Fernand. The Identity of France. 2 vols. New York: Harper and Row, 1989.Google Scholar

Breitmeier, Helmut, and Rittberger, Volker. “Environmental NGOs in an Emerging Global Civil Society.” Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung Nr. 32. Tübingen: University of Tübingen, 1998. Available at www.uni-tuebingen.de/ifp/taps/tap32.htm.Google Scholar

Brierly, James Leslie. The Law of Nations, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Bronkhorst, Daa. Truth and Reconciliation: Obstacles and Opportunities for Human Rights. Amsterdam: Amnesty International, Dutch Section, 1995.Google Scholar

Brooks, Risa A. “Sanctions and Regime Type: What Works, and When?” Security Studies 11:4 (2002): 1–50.Google Scholar

Broome, Andre, and Quirk, Joel. “The Politics of Numbers: The Normative Agendas of Global Benchmarking.” Review of International Studies 41:5 (2015): 813–818.Google Scholar

Brunner, Otto. Adeliges Landleben und Europäischer Geist: Leben und Werk Wolf Helmhards von Hohberg, 1612–1688. Salzburg: Otto Müller, 1949.Google Scholar

Brunner, Otto. Land and Lordship: Structures of Governance in Medieval Austria, vol. 4. Translated by Kaminsky, H. and van Horn Melton, J.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Brunner, Otto. Neue Wege der Sozialgeschichte: Vorträge und Aufsätze, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1956.Google Scholar

Brzoska, Michael. “From Dumb to Smart? Recent Reforms of UN Sanctions.” Global Governance 9 (2003): 519–536.Google Scholar

Bubner, Rüdiger. Handlung, Sprache und Vernunft: Grundbegriffe Praktischer Philosophie, 2nd edn. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1982.Google Scholar

Bucher, Bernd, “Acting, Abstractions, Metaphors, Narrative Structures and the Eclipse of Agency.” European Journal of International Relations 20:3 (2014): 742–765.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian. “Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and International Politics.” European Political Science Review 6:3 (2014): 383–406.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank. International Practice Theory: New Perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach.” World Politics 18:3 (1966): 361–377.Google Scholar

Burley, Anne-Marie. “Regulating the World: Multilateralism, International Law, and the Projection of the New Deal Regulatory State.” In Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, edited by Ruggie, J.G., New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, 125–156.Google Scholar

Butler, Richard. The Greatest Threat: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Growing Crisis of Global Security. New York: Public Affairs, 2000.Google Scholar

Butterfield, Herbert. The Whig Interpretation of History. New York: Norton, 1965.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and de Wilde, Jaap. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997.Google Scholar

Calabresi, Guido, and Bobbitt, Philip. Tragic Choices. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar

Callaghy, Thomas. Innovation in the Sovereign Debt Regime: From the Paris Club to Enhanced HIPC and Beyond. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2004.Google Scholar

Callaghy, Thomas. “Lost between the State and Market: The Politics of Economic Adjustment in Ghana, Zambia, and Nigeria.” In Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World, edited by Nelson, J.M., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990, 257–320.Google Scholar

Callaghy, Thomas. “Toward State Capability and Embedded Liberalism in the Third World: Lessons for Adjustment.” In Fragile Coalitions: The Politics of Economic Adjustment, edited by Nelson, J.M., New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1989, 115–138.Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo. “The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures.” European Journal of International Law 12:5 (2001): 889–916.Google Scholar

Capaldi, Nicholas. “Some Misconceptions about Hume’s Moral Theory.” Ethics 76:3 (1966): 208–211.Google Scholar

Carli, Silvia. “Poetry Is More Philosophical Than History.” The Review of Metaphysics 64:2 (2010): 303–336.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. Philosophy and Logical Syntax. New York: AMS Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Carnegie, Dale. How to Win Friends and Influence People. New York: Pocket Books, 1981 [1936].Google Scholar

Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Years’ Crisis. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964.Google Scholar

Carver, Terrell, and Bartelson, Jens. Globality, Democracy and Civil Society. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, Baig, L., Fan, M., Gosnell, Christopher, and Whiting, A.. Cassese’s International Criminal Law, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Castaneda, Hector. Thinking and Doing. Dordrecht: D. Riedel, 1975.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Daase., Christopher “Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 9:1 (2003): 5–35.Google Scholar

Cerny, Philip G. The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency, and the Future of the State. London: Sage, 1990.Google Scholar

Cerny, Philip G.. “Globalization and Other Stories: The Search for a New Paradigm for International Relations.” International Journal 51:4 (1996): 617–637.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone, and Kymlicka, Will. Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Chapman, Audrey R., and Ball, Patrick. “The Truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative Lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala.” Human Rights Quarterly 23:1 (2001): 1–43.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve. “Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions.” American Journal of International Law 95:4 (2001): 792–832.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. “On Compliance.” International Organization 47:2 (1993): 175–205.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. “International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist: Constructivist Divide.” European Journal of International Relations 3:4 (1997): 473–495.Google Scholar

Chernoff, Fred. “Scientific Realism as a Meta-Theory of International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 46:2 (2002): 189–207.Google Scholar

Chopra, Jarat. “The UN’s Kingdom of East Timor.” Survival 42:3 (2000): 27–39.Google Scholar

Chopra, Jarat, and Weiss, Thomas G.. “Sovereignty Is No Longer Sacrosanct: Codifying Humanitarian Intervention.” Ethics and International Affairs 6:1 (1992): 95–117.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas, and Christman, John (eds.). Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley, 2009.Google Scholar

Cicero, . De Oratore. Heidelberg: Winter, 1981.Google Scholar

Cirincione, Joseph, Mathews, Jessica T., and Perkovich, George. WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2004.Google Scholar

Clarke, Kamari Maxine. Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Cockayne, James. “Special Court for Sierra Leone: Decision on the Recusal of Judges Robertson and Winter.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2:4 (2004): 1154–1162.Google Scholar

Cohen, Benjamin J. The Geography of Money. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Cohen, Bernard. “Newton and the Social Sciences, with Special Reference to Economics, or, the Case of the Missing Paradigm.” In Natural Images in Economic Thought: Markets Read in Tooth and Claw, edited by Mirowski, P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 55–90.Google Scholar

Cohen, Marshall (ed.). Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1984.Google Scholar

Cohen, Morris. “Property and Sovereignty.” In Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions, edited by MacPherson, C.B., Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978, 153–176.Google Scholar

Cohen, Stephen F. Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution: A Political Biography, 1888–1938. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Cohon, Rachel. Hume’s Morality: Feeling and Fabrication. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cohon, Rachel. “The Common Point of View in Hume’s Ethics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57:4 (1997): 827–850.Google Scholar

Coleman, James Samuel. Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.Google Scholar

Collier, David, and Levitak, Steven. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49:3 (1997): 430–451.Google Scholar

Combs, Nancy A. Fact-Finding without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Conlisk, John. “Why Bounded Rationality?” Journal of Economic Literature 34:2 (1996): 669–700.Google Scholar

Connaughton, Richard M. Military Intervention and Peacekeeping: The Reality. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar

Connolly, William. The Terms of Political Discourse, 2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Conquest, Robert. The Great Terror: A Reassessment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Cortright, David. “Powers of Persuasion: Sanctions and Incentives in the Shaping of International Society.” International Studies 38:2 (2001): 113–125.Google Scholar

Cortright, David. The Sanctions Decade: Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990s. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000.Google Scholar

Coser, Lewis A. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Cowhey, Peter F. “Elect Locally – Order Globally: Domestic Politics and Multilateral Cooperation.” In Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, edited by Ruggie, J.G., New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, 157–200.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. “Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10:2 (1981): 204–254.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. “Humanitarianism and the Quest for Smarter Sanctions.” European Journal of International Law 13:1 (2002): 43–61.Google Scholar

Crawford, Neta, and Klotz, Audie. How Sanctions Work: Lessons from South Africa. New York: Palgrave, 1999.Google Scholar

Crawford, Neta, and Cunneen, Chris. “Reparations and Restorative Justice: Responding to the Gross Violation of Human Rights.” In Restorative Justice and Civil Society, edited by Strang, H. and Braithwaite, J., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 83–98.Google Scholar

Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, and Rosenau, James N. (eds.). Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989.Google Scholar

D’Ascoli, Silvia. Sentencing in International Criminal Law: The UN Ad Hoc Tribunals and Future Perspectives for the ICC. Oxford: Hart, 2011.Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, Jean. “Wording in International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 25:3 (2012): 575–602.Google Scholar

Dahrendorf, Ralf. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Daily Mail Reporter. “Goldman Sachs Chief Says ‘We Do God’s Work’ as He Defends the Bank’s Mega Profits,” Daily Mail, November 8, 2009, accessed at www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1226114/Goldman-Sachs-chief-says-Gods-work-defends-banks-bumper-profits.html on May 29, 2016.Google Scholar

Dallaire, Roméo. Shake Hands with the Devil: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda. London: Arrow, 2005.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. Analytical Philosophy of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. “Looking at the Future, Looking at the Present as Past.” In Mortality, Immortality: The Legacy of 20th Century Art, edited by Miguel, A. C., Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute, 1999, 3–12.Google Scholar

Dashti-Gibson, J., Davis, P., and Radcliff, B.. “On the Determinants of the Success of Economic Sanctions: An Empirical Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 41:2 (1997): 608–618.Google Scholar

David, Marcel. La Souveraineté et les limites juridiques du pouvoir monarchique: de IXe au XVe siècle. Paris: Dalloz, 1954.Google Scholar

David, Paul A. “Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda’s Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History.” In Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology, edited by Wallerstein, M.B.. Mogee, M.E., and Schoen, R.A., Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1993, 19–62.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 63:23 (1966): 685–700.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. Essays on Actions and Events. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980Google Scholar

Davis, James. Terms of Inquiry: On the Theory and Practice of Political Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Davis, James. Threats and Promises: The Pursuit of International Influence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dayan, Daniel, and Katz, Elihu. Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

de Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Rendall, S.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

de Franco, Chiara. “Media Power and the Rise of Emotions in International Politics.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Atlanta, GA, 2016.Google Scholar

de Franco, Chiara. Media Power and the Transformation of War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar

de Gaulle, Charles. Discours et messages, vol. 2. Paris: Plon, 1974.Google Scholar

de Jonge Oudraat, Chantal. “UNSCOM: Between Iraq and a Hard Place.” European Journal of International Law 13:1 (2002): 139–152.Google Scholar

de Tarde, Gabriel. The Laws of Imitation. Trans. Parson, E.C.. New York: H. Holt, 1903.Google Scholar

de Tocqueville, Alexis. The Ancient Regime and the French Revolution. Trans. Gilbert, S.. London: Collins, 1971.Google Scholar

de Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1969.Google Scholar

de Vries, Anthonius W. “European Union Sanctions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1998 to 2000: A Special Exercise in Targeting.” In Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft, edited by Cortright, D. and Lopez, G.A., Lanham. MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002, 87–108.Google Scholar

Debrix, François. Re-Envisioning Peacekeeping: The United Nations and the Mobilization of Ideology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Dehqanzada, Yahya A., and Ann, Florini. Secrets for Sale: How Commercial Satellite Imagery Will Change the World. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2000.Google Scholar

Deitelhof, Nicole. “The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case.” International Organization 63:1 (2009): 33–65.Google Scholar

della Porta, Donatella, and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.). Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar

“Der Teenie-Schwarm,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (Wirtschaft), April 24, 2016.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Trans. Cress, D.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Meditations on First Philosophy. 2nd edn. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Dessler, David. “What Is at Stake in the Agent/Structure Debate.” International Organization 43:3 (1989): 441–473.Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel. Bounding Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel. “The Philadelphia System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and the Balance of Power in the American States-Union, circa 1787–1861.” International Organization 49:2 (1995): 191–228.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan, 1916.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: H. Holt, 1922.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relationship between Knowledge and Action. London: Allen and Unwin, 1930.Google Scholar

Dickstein, Morris, and Bernstein, Richard J. (eds.). The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Diesing, Paul. How Does Social Science Work?: Reflections on Practice. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram. War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Elizabeth A. “Proclaiming Jubilee: The Debt and Structural Adjustment Network.” In Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, edited by Khagram, S., Sikkink, K., and Riker, J.V., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002, 155–180.Google Scholar

Doty, Roxanne Lynn. “Aporia: A Critical Explanation of the Agent/Structure Problem.” European Journal of International Relations 3:3 (1997): 365–392.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12:3 (1983): 205–235.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W.. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12:4 (1983): 323–353.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W.. Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Drake, William J. “Conclusion: Policies for the National and Global Information Infrastructures.” In The New Information Infrastructure: Strategies for U.S. Policy, edited by Drake, W.J., New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995, 345–378.Google Scholar

Drake, William J. (ed.). The New Information Infrastructure: Strategies for U.S. Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Drake, William J., and Wilson, Ernest J. III (eds.). Governing Global Electronic Networks: International Perspectives on Policy and Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Draper, G.I.A.D. “Grotius’ Place in the Development of Legal Ideas about War.” In Hugo Grotius and International Relations, edited by Bull, H., Kingsbury, B. and Roberts, A., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 177–208.Google Scholar

Dray, William H. Laws and Explanation in History. London: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Drazen, Allan. “Political Contagion in Currency Crises.” In Currency Crises, edited by Krugman, P., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, 47–70.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Huberty, and Charles, Taylor. Retrieving Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2015.Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel W. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johan Gustav. Historik: Rekonstruktion der Ersten Vollständigen Fassung der Vorlesungen (1857), Grundriss der Historik in der Ersten Handschriftlichen (1857/1858) und in der Letzten Gedruckten Fassung (1882). Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1977.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark A. Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark A.. “Punishment, Postgenocide: From Guilt to Shame to Civis in Rwanda.” New York University Law Review 75:5 (2000): 1221–1326.Google Scholar

Duby, Georges. Le Dimanche de Bouvines, 27 juillet 1214. Paris: Gallimard, 1973.Google Scholar

Duby, Georges. The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined. Trans. Goldhammer, A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Duchêne, François. “Europe’s Role in World Peace.” In Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, edited by Mayne, R., London: Fontana, 1972, 32–47.Google Scholar

Düll, Rudolf. Das Zwölftafelgesetz: Texte, Übersetzungen und Erläuterungen. München: Heimeran, 1953.Google Scholar

Dunbar, Nicholas. Inventing Money: The Story of Long-Term Capital Management and the Legends Behind It. Chichester: Wiley, 2000.Google Scholar

Dunlap, Charles J. Jr., Major General “Lawfare Today: A Perspective,” Yale Journal of International Affairs 3:1 (2008): 146–154.Google Scholar

Dunne, Timothy. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. “A General Stocktaking of the Connections between the Multilateral Dimension of Obligations and Codification of the Law of Responsibility.” European Journal of International Law 13:5 (2002): 1053–1081.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. The Division of Labor in Society, New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. L’Education morale, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1974.Google Scholar

Duvall, Raymond, and Wendt, Alexander. “Institutions and International Order.” In Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s, edited by Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, and Rosenau, James N. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989: 51–73.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.M. “Is Law a System of Rules?” In The Philosophy of Law, edited by Dworkin, R.M., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977, 38–65.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.M.. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.M.. A Matter of Principle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.M.. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Eckerman, Ingrid. The Bhopal Saga: Causes and Consequences of the World’s Largest Industrial Disaster. Bhopal: Universities Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Edgerton, Robert B. Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Edwards, Michael. Civil Society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Ehrenfreund, Norbert. The Nuremberg Legacy: How the Nazi War Crimes Trials Changed the Course of History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry. “The International Monetary Fund in the Wake of the Asian Crisis.” In The Asian Financial Crisis and the Architecture of Global Finance, edited by Noble, G.W., and Ravenhill, J., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 170–191.Google Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry, Tobin, James, and Wyplosz, Charles. “Two Cases for Sand in the Wheels of International Finance.” The Economic Journal 105:428 (1995): 162–172.Google Scholar

Elbe, Joachim von. “The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law.” The American Journal of International Law 33:4 (1939): 665–688.Google Scholar

Elewabadar, Mohamed. “Mens Rea – Mistake of Law and Mistake of Fact in German Criminal Law: A Survey for International Criminal Tribunals.” International Criminal Law Review 5:2 (2005): 203–246.Google Scholar

Eliade, Mircea. Images and Symbols: Studies in Religious Symbolism. Trans. Mairet, P.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Elliott, Kimberly Ann. “The Sanctions Glass: Half Full or Completely Empty?” International Security 23:1 (1998): 50–65.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin, and Miriam, Fendius-Elman. “How Not to Be Lakatos Intolerant: Appraising Progress in IR Research.” International Studies Quarterly 46:2 (2002): 231–262.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order, Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Motivations and Beliefs in Suicide Missions.” In Making Sense of Suicide Missions, edited by Gambetta, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 233–258.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Norms of Revenge.” Ethics 100:4 (1990): 862–885.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann, Mische. “What Is Agency?” The American Journal of Sociology 103:4 (1998): 962–1023.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth J. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold Karan, and Putnam, Robert D. (eds.). Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Fahrenbach, Helmut (ed.). Wirklichkeit und Reflexion, Festschrift für Walter Schulz. Pfullingen: Neske 1973.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A. Explorations at the Edge of Time: The Prospects for World Order. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Falke, Andreas. “The EU-US Conflict over Sanctions Policy: Confronting the Hegemon.” European Foreign Affairs Review 5:2 (2000): 139–163.Google Scholar

Farrall, Jeremy Matam. United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Farrington, John, and Anthony, Bebbington (eds.). Reluctant Partners?: Non-Governmental Organizations, the State and Sustainable Agricultural Development. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo. “Uncertain Steps into a Post-Cold War World: The Role and Functioning of the UN Security Council after a Decade of Measures Against Iraq.” European Journal of International Law 13:1 (2002): 273–303.Google Scholar

Fawthrop, Tom, and Jarvis, Helen. Getting Away with Genocide? Elusive Justice and the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. London: Pluto Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fearon, James D. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43:2 (1991): 169–195.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Richard. “The Changing Relationship between the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.” International Organization, 42:2 (1988): 545–560.Google Scholar

Feldstein, Martin S. “Refocusing the IMF.” Foreign Affairs 77:2 (1998): 20–33.Google Scholar

Felice, Damiano de, and Obina, Francesco. “Out of the Ivory Tower: Weaving the Theories and Practices of International Relations.” Millennium 40:3 (2012): 431–437.Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B. Defining International Aggression, the Search for World Peace: A Documentary History and Analysis. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1975.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Yale H., and Mansbach, Richard W.. Polities: Authority, Identities and Change. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ferreira, M.J. The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Ferreira, M.J. “Hume and Imagination: Sympathy and ‘the Other’.” International Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1994): 39–57.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karen, and Joergensen, Knud Erik (eds.). Constructing International Relations, the Next Generation. Armonk, NY/London: M.E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar

Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha and Other Political Writings, edited by Laslett, P., Oxford: Blackwell, 1949.Google Scholar

Findlay, Alison. Illegitimate Power: Bastards in Renaissance Drama. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Fine, Gail. On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Finkielkraut, Alain. Remembering in Vain: The Klaus Barbie Trial and Crimes against Humanity. Trans. Lapidius, R.. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Finley, Moses I. The Ancient Economy. London: Hogarth Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Finley, Moses I.. “The Ancient Historian and His Sources.” In Ancient History: Evidence and Models, New York: Penguin Books, 1985, 7–26.Google Scholar

Finley, Moses, et al. (eds.). Economy and Society in Ancient Greece. New York: Viking Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52:4 (1998): 887–917.Google Scholar

Fiori, Stefano. “Adam Smith on Method: Newtonianism, History, Institutions, and the ‘Invisible Hand’.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 34:3 (2012): 411–435.Google Scholar

Fischer, Fritz. Griff nach der Weltmacht: die Kriegszielpolitik des kaiserlichen Deutschland 1914/18. Düsseldorf: Droste, 1961.Google Scholar

Fischer, Markus. “Feudal Europe, 800–1300: Communal Discourse and Conflictual Practices.” International Organization 46:2 (1992): 427–466.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Teubner, Gunther. Regime Kollisionen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2006.Google Scholar

Flaumenhaft, Mera J. The Civic Spectacle: Essays on Drama and Community. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.Google Scholar

Flavius, Josephus. The Jewish War. Trans. Williamson, G.A.. New York: Dorset Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Florini, Ann (ed.). The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Forlati, Serena. “Reactions to Nonperformance of Treaties in International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 24:3 (2012): 759–70.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics. Trans. Burchell, G.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 2nd edn. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Edited by Senellart, M. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum. Edited by Müller, C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.. Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Frank, Joseph. The Beginnings of the English Newspaper, 1620–1660. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Franke, Ulrich, and Weber, Ralph. “At the Papini Hotel – on Pragmatism in the Study of International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 18:4 (2012): 669–691.Google Scholar

Freeman, Mark. Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. Edward. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing, 1984.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. “Internationalization of the US Economy.” Paper presented at the Fraser Forum 1989.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966, 3–16, 30–43.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, edited by Brodbeck, M., New York: Macmillan, 1968, 508–528.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970: 32–33 and 122–126.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. “On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology.” International Organization 63:4 (2009): 701–731.Google Scholar

Frisch, Karl von. The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Frost, Mervyn. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Christian. Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Avon Books, 1992.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71:4 (1958): 630–672.Google Scholar

Fuller, Stephen. Social Epistemology. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Markus. Warum Es die Welt Nicht Gibt. Berlin: Ullstein, 2013.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, 2nd edn. Edited by and trans. Weinsheimer, Joel, New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Gallie, W.B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” In The Importance of Language, edited by Black, M., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962.Google Scholar

Gallie, W.B.. Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, 2nd edn. New York: Schocken Books, 1968.Google Scholar

Galtung, Johan. “On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions, with Examples from the Case of Rhodesia.” World Politics 19:3 (1967): 378–416.Google Scholar

Gambetta, Diego. “Can We Make Sense of Suicide Missions?” In Making Sense of Suicide Missions, edited by Gambetta, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 259–300.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Garthoff, Raymond L. Detente and Confrontation: American–Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1994.Google Scholar

Gaskins, Richard. Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. De Jure Belli Libri Tres. Classics in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933.Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre, Holyoak, Keith James, and Kokinov, Boicho N. (eds.). The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., and Smoke, Richard. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Georges, Duby. Les Trois Ordres ou l’imaginaire du féodalisme. Paris: Gallimard, 1978.Google Scholar

Georgi, Oliver. “Automatisierter Hass im Netz,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, May 24, 2016, accessed at www.faz.net/-gpf-8hc5h.Google Scholar

Gerschenkron, Alexander. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Margaret. On Social Facts, London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Gill, Stephen. “The Global Panopticon? The Neoliberal State, Economic Life, and Democratic Surveillance.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 20:1 (1995): 1–49.Google Scholar

Gill, Stephen. (ed.). Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert. “Has Modern Technology Changed International Politics?” In The Analysis of International Politics: Essays in Honor of Harold and Margaret Sprout, edited by Rosenau, J.N., Davis, V., and East, M.A., New York: Free Press, 1972, 166–173.Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Gilson, Douglas. “Justice Denied,” Foreign Policy, November 23, 2011, accessed at http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/11/23/justice-denied.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1966.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face-Behavior. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, 1959.Google Scholar

Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar

Goldman, Wendy Z. Inventing the Enemy: Denunciation and Terror in Stalin’s Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack. The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment inside the Bush Administration. New York: W.W. Norton, 2007.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.). Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Goldstone, Richard. “Justice as a Tool for Peace-Making: Truth Commissions and International Criminal Tribunals.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 28:3 (1996): 485–503.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, John H. “The Uses of History in Sociology: A Reply.” British Journal of Sociology 45:1 (1994): 55–77.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, John H.. “The Uses of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies.” British Journal of Sociology 42:2 (1991): 211–230.Google Scholar

Gordon, Joy. “A Peaceful, Silent, Deadly Remedy: The Ethics of Economic Sanctions.” Ethics and International Affairs 13:1 (1999): 123–142.Google Scholar

Gowa, Joanne. “Rational Hegemons, Excludable Goods, and Small Groups: An Epitaph for Hegemonic Stability Theory?” World Politics 41:3 (1989): 307–324.Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited by Hoare, Q. and Nowell-Smith, G., London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1971.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83:6 (1978): 1420–1443.Google Scholar

Graves, Christopher. “The International Criminal Court and Individualism: An African Perspective.” In Critical Approaches to International Criminal Law: An Introduction, edited by Schwöbel, C.E.J., Abingdon: Routledge, 2014, 221–245.Google Scholar

Gray, Christine D. International Law and the Use of Force, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Gray, John. Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia. London: Penguin, 2007.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres. Trans. Kelsey, F.W.. New York: Oceana, 1964 [1646].Google Scholar

Grzebyk, Patrycja. Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Gulick, Edward Vose. Europe’s Classical Balance of Power: A Case History of the Theory and Practice of One of the Great Concepts of European Statecraft. New York: W.W. Norton, 1967.Google Scholar

Gutting, Gary (ed.). Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6:2 (2000): 147–182.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Haan, Verena. “The Development of the Concept of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” International Criminal Law Review 5:2 (2005): 167–201.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B. “Is There a Hole in the Whole? Knowledge, Technology, Interdependence, and the Construction of International Regimes.” International Organization 29:3 (1975): 827–876.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B.. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B.. “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes.” World Politics 32:3 (1980): 357–405.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter M., and Haas, Ernst B.. “Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions.” Millennium 32:3 (2002): 573–601.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N. “Sanctioning Madness.” Foreign Affairs 76:6 (1997): 74–85.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard, and O’Sullivan, Meghan L.. Honey and Vinegar: Incentives, Sanctions, and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Luchterhand, 1971.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Wahrheitstheorien.” In Wirklichkeit und Reflexion, Festschrift für Walter Schulz, edited by Fahrenbach, H., Pullingen: Neske 1973, 122–65.Google Scholar

Hagan, John. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephen. “The Political Economy of the Philippine Debt Crisis.” In Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World, edited by Nelson, J.M., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990, 215–256.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephen. “The Politics of Adjustment: Lessons from the IMF’s Extended Fund Facility.” In The Politics of International Debt, edited by Kahler, M., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986, 157–186.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephen, and Kaufman, Robert R. (eds.). The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. “Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland’s Inaugural Lecture.” In Hugo Grotius and International Relations, edited by Bull, H., Kingsbury, B., and Roberts, A., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 133–176.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, Maurice. On Collective Memory. Trans. Coser, L.A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Halévy, Elie. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism. Trans. Morris, M.. London: Faber and Faber, 1972.Google Scholar

Hall, Rodney Bruce. “The Discursive Demolition of the Asian Development Model.” International Studies Quarterly 47:1 (2003): 71–99.Google Scholar

Hall, Rodney Bruce. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. “Beyond (Post) Positivism: The Missed Promises of Systemic Pragmatism,” International Studies Quarterly 56:2 (2012): 291–305.Google Scholar

Hammond, Philip. Media, War and Postmodernity. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Handel, Michael I. “The Yom Kippur War and the Inevitability of Surprise.” International Studies Quarterly 21:3 (1977): 461–502.Google Scholar

Hansen, Lene. “How Images Make World Politics: International Icons and the Case of Abu Ghraib.” Review of International Studies 41:2 (2015): 263–288.Google Scholar

Hardin, Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (1968): 1243–1248.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. David Hume: Moral and Political Theorist, Oxford–NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hare, R.M. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Hariman, Robert, and Lucaites, John Louis. No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Harkin, Michael. “Potlach in Anthropology.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Smelser, N.J. and Baltes, P.B., New York: Elsevier, 2001, 11885–11889.Google Scholar

Harre, Rom. Varieties of Realism: A Rationale for the Natural Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A.. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71:4 (1958): 593–629.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A.. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A., and Honoré, Tony. Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Hart, Nicky. “John Goldthorpe and the Relics of Sociology.” British Journal of Sociology 45:1 (1994): 21–30.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. The Enigma of Capital: And the Crises of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Hasluck, Margaret Masson Hardie. The Unwritten Law in Albania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35:4 (1945): 519–530.Google Scholar

Hayner, Priscilla B. “Fifteen Truth Commissions – 1974–1994: A Comparative Study.” Human Rights Quarterly 16:4 (1994): 597–655.Google Scholar

Hayner, Priscilla B.. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity, New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Philosophy of Right. Trans. Knox, T.M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Helleiner, Eric. “Explaining the Globalization of Financial Markets: Bringing States Back In.” Review of International Political Economy 2:2 (1995): 315–341.Google Scholar

Heller, Jon, Kevin, . “The Taylor Sentencing Judgment: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 11:4 (2013): 835–855.Google Scholar

Hellmann, Gunther. “Pragmatism and International Relations.” International Studies Review 11:3 (2009): 638–662.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl. Aspects of Scientific Explanation, and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl. “The Function of General Laws in History.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation, edited by Hempel, C., New York: Free Press, 1965, 231–244.Google Scholar

Henham, Ralph. “Developing Contextualized Rationales for Sentencing in International Criminal Trials.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5:3 (2007): 757–778.Google Scholar

Henham, Ralph. Punishment and Process in International Criminal Trials. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, and Council on Foreign Relations. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger, 1968.Google Scholar

Herodotus, . The Histories. Trans. De Sélincourt, A.. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1954.Google Scholar

Hesse, Mary B. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Hexter, J.H. Reappraisals in History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O.. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O.. “The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrialization in Latin America.” In A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971, 85–123.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O.. “The Rise and Decline of Development Economics.” In Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, 1–24.Google Scholar

Hirsh, Michael, and Barry, John. “How We Stumbled into War.” Newsweek, April 12, 1999.Google Scholar

Hirst, Paul. “The Global Economy – Myths and Realities.” International Affairs 73:3 (1997): 409–425.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. De Cive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949 [1642].Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Elements of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by MacPherson, C.B. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1968 [1651].Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Holbrooke, Richard C. To End a War. New York: Random House, 1998.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin, and Smith, Steve. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. “Political Psychology in Hobbes’s Behemoth.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, edited by Dietz, M.G., Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. “The Secret History of Self- Interest.” In Beyond Self-Interest, edited by Mansbridge, J., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990, 267–286.Google Scholar

Homer, . The Iliad. Trans. Butler, S.. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1924.Google Scholar