Book contents
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 May 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Challenge of Inter-Legality , pp. 391 - 426Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abi-Saab, Georges, “Le règlement des différends à l’OMC et le droit international général,” in Yerxa, Rufus and Wilson, Bruce (eds.), Questions Clès dans le Domaine du Règlement des Différends de l’OMC: Les Dix Premières Années (Geneva: Secrétariat de l’OMC, 2007), 7–11.Google Scholar
Acosta Arcarazo, Diego, National versus the Foreigner in South America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Acosta Arcarazo, Diego, “Turning the Immigration Policy Paradox Upside Down? Populist Liberalism and Discursive Gaps in South America,” (2015) 49 International Migration Review 659–696.Google Scholar
Acosta Arcarazo, Diego and Geddes, Andrew, “Transnational Diffusion or Different Models? Regional Approaches to Migration Governance in the European Union and MERCOSUR,” (2014) 16 European Journal of Migration and Law 19–44.Google Scholar
Adam, Stanislas and Van Elsuwege, Peter, “Citizenship Rights and the Federal Balance between the European Union and Its Member States,” (2012) 37 European Law Review 176–190.Google Scholar
Adepoju, Aderanti, “Fostering Free Movement of Persons in West Africa: Achievements, Constraints, and Prospects for Intraregional Migration,” (2002) 40 International Migration 3–28.Google Scholar
Adepoju, Aderanti, “Migration Management in West Africa within the Context of ECOWAS Protocol on Free Movement of Persons and the Common Approach on Migration,” in OECD (ed.), Regional Challenges of West African Migration (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009), 17–47.Google Scholar
Adinolfi, Giovanna, “Il diritto non scritto nel sistema OMC,” in Palchetti, Paolo (ed.), L’Incidenza del Diritto non Scritto sul Diritto Internazionale ed Europeo (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2016), 75–113.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Akehurst, Michael, “Jurisdiction in International Law,” (1972–1973) 46 British Yearbook of International Law 145–257.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip, “Does the Past Matter? On the Origins of Human Rights,” (2013) 126 Harvard Law Review 2043–2081.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context,” (2008) 14 European Journal of International Relations 33–63.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José, “Beware: Boundary Crossings,” in Kahana, Tsvi and Scolnicov, Anat (eds.), Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights: Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 43–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, José, “The Return of the State,” (2011) 20 Minnesota Journal of International Law 223–264.Google Scholar
Amaya, Amalia, “Exemplarism and Judicial Virtue,” (2013) 25 Law and Literature 428–445.Google Scholar
Amaya, Amalia, “Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence,” (2011) 24 Ratio Juris 304–329.Google Scholar
Amaya, Amalia, The Tapestry of Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Coherence and Its Role in Legal Argument (Oxford: Hart, 2015).Google Scholar
Amstutz, Marc, “In-Between Worlds: Marleasing and the Emergence of Interlegality in Legal Reasoning” (2005) 11 European Law Journal 766–784.Google Scholar
Amstutz, Marc and Karavas, Vagios, “Weltrecht: Ein Derridasches Monster,” in Calliess, Graf-Peter, Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, Wielsch, Dan, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009), 645–672.Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter, “Illicit Globalisation Myths and Misconceptions,” in Mitsilegas, Valsamis, Alldridge, Peter, and Cheliotis, Leonidis (eds.), Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 45–64.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Laurens J. and Geursen, Wessel W., “Ruiz Zambrano: De Interne Situatie Voorbij,” (2011) 4 Asiel & Migrantenrecht 156–164.Google Scholar
Applbaum, Arthur Isak, Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Appleton, Arthur E., “PIL and IEL: Will Seal Deaths Resurrect the Dream of International Legal Coherence?” (2014) 9 Questions of International Law 5–18.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Treatise on the Virtues (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984, Oesterle trans.).Google Scholar
Arangio Ruiz, Gaetano, “International Law and Interindividual Law,” in Nijman, Janne and Nollkaemper, André (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 15–51.Google Scholar
Arato, Julian, “Subsequent Practice in the Whaling Case and What the ICJ Implies about Treaty Interpretation in International Organizations,” EJILTalk!, 31 March 2014.Google Scholar
Arcari, M. and Ninatti, S., Exploring Counter-Constitutionalism: The Backlash Effect of Constitutional Vocabulary of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, Workshop Draft Paper, July 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele and Held, David, Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Arcuri, Allessandra and Poli, Sara, What Price for the Community Enforcement of WTO Law? EUI Working Papers, Law, 2010/2011.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Penguin, 2006 [1962]).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Politics, translated by Benjamin Jowett, available at classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.3.three.htmlGoogle Scholar
Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, “Res Interpretata, Erga Omnes Effect and the Role of the Margin of Appreciation in Giving Domestic Effect to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights,” (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 819–843.Google Scholar
Arraiza, José-Maria, “Good Neighbourliness as a Limit to Extraterritorial Citizenship: The Case of Hungary and Slovakia,” in Kochenov, Dimitry and Basheska, Elena (eds.), Good Neighbourliness in the European Legal Context (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2015), 114–135.Google Scholar
Austin, John L., How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995 [1832]).Google Scholar
Azoulai, Loic, “Transfiguring European Citizenship: From Member State Territory to Union Territory,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 178–203.Google Scholar
Baars, Grietje et al., “The Role of Law in Global Value Chains: A Research Manifesto,” (2016) 4 London Review of International Law 57–79.Google Scholar
Babar, Zahra, “Free Mobility within the Gulf Cooperation Council,” (2011) Center for International and Regional Studies Occasional Paper 8.Google Scholar
Backer, Larry Catá, “Are Supply Chains Transnational Legal Orders? What We Can Learn from the Rana Plaza Factory Building Collapse,” (2016) 1 UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational and Comparative Law 11–66.Google Scholar
Backer, Larry Catá, “Economic Globalization and the Rise of Efficient Systems of Global Private Lawmaking: Wal-Mart as Global Legislator,” (2007) 39 University of Connecticut Law Review 1739–1784.Google Scholar
Backer, Larry Catá, “Theorizing Regulatory Governance within its Ecology: The Structure of Management in an Age of Globalization,” (2018) 24 Contemporary Politics 607–630.Google Scholar
Baird, Rachel, “The Antarctic Treaty System and Japan’s Scientific Whaling in the Southern Ocean – Is There an Obligation to Protect the Antarctic Marine Ecosystem?” (2008) 11 Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 193–206.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M., “Agreements with Hell and Other Objects of Our Faith,” (1997) 65 Fordham Law Review 1703–1738.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M., “The Proliferation of Legal Truth,” (2003) 26 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 5–16.Google Scholar
Barral, Virginie and Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “Sustainable Development through Integration,” in Vinuales, Jorge (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 157–180.Google Scholar
Barroche, Julien, Etat, Libéralisme et Christianisme – Critique de la Subsidiarité Européenne (Paris: Dalloz, 2012).Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, “Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings,” (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 499.Google Scholar
Basch, Fernando et al., “La Efectividad del Sistema Interamericano de Protección de Derechos Humanos: Un Enfoque Cuantitativo sobre su Funcionamiento y sobre el Cumplimento de sus Decisiones,” (2010) 7 Sur: Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos 9–36.Google Scholar
Battini, Stefano, Amministrazioni senza Stato. Profili di Diritto Amministrativo Internazionale (Milan: Giuffrè, 2003).Google Scholar
Baude, William and Doerfler, Ryan D., “Arguing with Friends,” available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2985032Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard, Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren, Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, The Law of Global Governance (The Hague: Hague Academy of International Law, 2014).Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff, “Global Legal Pluralism,” (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review 1155–1237.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff, “The Globalization of Jurisdiction,” (2002) 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 311–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven and Cashore, Benjamin, “Can Non-State Global Governance be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework,” (2007) 1 Regulation & Governance 347–371.Google Scholar
Bernstorff, Jochen von, Der Glaube an das universal Recht: zur Völkerrechtstheorie Hans Kelsens und seiner Schüler (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001).Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “The Authority of International Law: Lifting the State Veil,” (2009) 31 Sydney Law Review 343–380.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Community Interests in International Law: Whose Interests are They and How does One Identify Them?” in Benvenisti, E. and Nolte, G. (eds.), Community Obligations in Contemporary International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 36–49.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Community Interests in the Identification of International Law: With a Special Emphasis on Treaty Interpretation and Customary Law Identification,” in Benvenisti, Eyal and Nolte, Georg (eds.), Community Obligations in Contemporary International Law (Oxford University Press, 2018), 50–69.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Deliberative Demoi-cracy in the European Union. Towards the Deterritorialization of Democracy,” in Besson, Samantha and Luis Marti, José (eds.), Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), 181–214.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “European Legal Pluralism after Kadi,” (2009) 5 European Constitutional Law Review 237–264.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “The Extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights. Why Human Rights Depend on Jurisdiction and What Jurisdiction Amounts To,” (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 857–884.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Fédéralisme et droits de l’homme: une introduction thématique,” in Besson, Samantha and Belser, Eva Maria (eds.), La Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme et les Cantons (Zurich: Schulthess, 2014), 7–39.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Human Rights and Democracy in a Global Context – Decoupling and Recoupling,” (2011) 4 Ethics and Global Politics 19–50.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Human Rights as Transnational Constitutional Law,” in Lang, Anthony and Wiener, Antje (eds.), Handbook on Global Constitutionalism (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), 234–247.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Individual and State Liability for an International Organization’s Responsibility – The Challenge of Fairness Unveiled,” (2017) 6 Italian Journal of Legal Philosophy 51–78.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “International Law’s Relative Authority, Review of Nicole Roughan’s Authorities. Conflicts, Cooperation and Transnational Legal Theory,” (2015) 6 Jurisprudence 169–176.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “L’extra-territorialité des droits de l’homme internationaux: juridictions concurrentes, obligations conjointes et responsabilités partagées,” in d’Argent, Pierre (ed.), Droit des Frontières Internationales (Paris: Pedone, 2016).Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Law Beyond the State: A Reply to Liam Murphy,” (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law, 233–240.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Shared Responsibilities under the ECHR: Concurrent Jurisdictions, Duties and Responsibilities,” in Motoc, J. et al. (eds.), The ECHR and General International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Sovereignty,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 9 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) 366–391.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making: Dissolving the Paradox,” (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 289–316.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Law – What is Subsidiary about Human Rights?” (2016) 61 American Journal of Jurisprudence 69–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “The Truth about Legal Pluralism, Review of Nico Krisch’s Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law,” (2012) European Constitutional Law Review 354–361.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Theorizing the Sources of International Law,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 164–185.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, Daniel, “The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law,” (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 9–24.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, “Reply to Professor Maier,” in Matthias Meessen, Karl (ed.), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Theory and Practice (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996), 74–102.Google Scholar
Blake, Judith and Davis, Kingsley, “Norms, Values, and Sanctions,” in Faris, Robert E. L. (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1964), 456–484.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, Albert, “The Personal Jurisdiction of the European Community,” (1980) 17 Common Market Law Review 467–486.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, “Plurality in the Fabric of International Courts and Tribunals: The Threads of a Managerial Approach,” (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 13–72.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, The International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Bos, Maarten, “Preliminary Report on the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of States,” (1993) 65 Yearbook of the International Law Institute 14.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda, “Citizenship Denationalized,” (2000) 7 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 447–510.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda, “Persons and Citizens in Constitutional Thought,” (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9–29.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field,” (1987) 38 Hastings Law Journal 805–853.Google Scholar
Bredbenner, Candice L., A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Brölmann, Catherine, “Deterritorializing International Law: Moving Away from the Divide between National and International Law,” in Nijman, Janna and Nollkaemper, André (eds.), New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 84–109.Google Scholar
Bronckers, Marco, “From ‘Direct Effect’ to ‘Muted Dialogue’: Recent Developments in the European Courts’ Case Law on the WTO and Beyond,” (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law 885.Google Scholar
Brown, Chester, A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke, Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke, “Dialectical Snares: Human Rights and Democracy in the World Society,” (2009) 2 Ethics and Global Politics 219–239.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Buck-Morss, Susan, Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Buhmann, Karin, “Business and Human Rights: Understanding the UN Guiding Principles from the Perspective of Transnational Business Governance Interactions,” (2015) 6 Transnational Legal Theory 399–434.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, Hannah, “Territory, Territoriality and the Resolution of Jurisdictional Conflict,” (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 631–675.Google Scholar
Caddell, Richard, “‘Only Connect’? Regime Interaction and Global Biodiversity Conservation,” in Bowman, Michael, Davies, Peter, and Goodwin, Edward (eds.), Research Handbook on Biodiversity and Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 443–446.Google Scholar
Calliess, Gralf-Peter and Zumbansen, Peer, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Enzo, “Margin of Appreciation and Reasonableness in the ICJ’s Decision in the Whaling Case,” in d’Argent, Pierre, Bonafé, Beatrice, and Combacau, Jean, (eds.), Les Limites du Droit International. Essais en l’Honneur de Joe Verhoeven (Brussels: Bruylant, 2014), 449–455.Google Scholar
Cardesa-Salzmann, Antonio, “Constitutionalizing Secondary Rules in Global Environmental Regimes: Non-Compliance Procedures and the Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements,” (2012) 24 Journal of Environmental Law 103–132.Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin N., The Nature of the Judicial Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991 [1921]).Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph, “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” (1987) 49 Review of Politics 251–273.Google Scholar
Carrara, Francesco, “Delitti commessi all’estero,” in Opuscoli di Diritto Criminale, 2nd edn. (Lucca: Tipografia Giusti, 1870).Google Scholar
Carta, Andrea and Ankersmit, Laurens, “AG Wathelet in C-284/16 Achmea: Saving ISDS?” available at https://europeanlawblog.eu/tag/ag-wathelet-in-c-28416-achmea.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, and Zappalà, Salvatore (eds.), The Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers of Antonio Cassese (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino, “Administrative Law without the State – The Challenge of Global Regulation,” (2005) 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 663–694Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino, The Global Polity. Global Dimensions of Democracy and the Rule of Law (Sevilla: Global Law Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino, Il Diritto Globale. Giustizia e Democrazia Oltre lo Stato (Torino: Einaudi, 2009).Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino, “Lo spazio giuridico globale,” (2002) 52 Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico 323–339.Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino, “Nel labirinto delle globalizzazioni,” (2007) 4 Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico 921–930Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino, “Shrimps, Turtles and Procedures: Global Standards for National Administrative Procedure,” (2005) 68 Law & Contemporary Problems 109–126.Google Scholar
Castrucci, Emanuele, On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Lesley, The Philosophy Steamer: Lenin and the Exile of the Intelligentsia (London: Atlantic Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Chan, Johannes M. M., “The right to a Nationality As a Human Right. The Current Trend towards Recognition,” (1991) 12 Human Rights Law Journal 1–14.Google Scholar
Chanock, Martin, Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antionia Handler, The New Sovereignty: Compliance and International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Chehtman, Alejandro, Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Chimni, B.S., International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Chiti, Edoardo, “Decentralized Implementation: European Agencies,” in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 748–776.Google Scholar
Chiti, Edoardo, “The European Security and Defense Administration within the Context of the Global Legal Space,” (2007) NYC School of Law Jean Monnet Working Paper 7.Google Scholar
Chiti, Edoardo and Wessel, Ramses A., “The Emergence of International Agencies in the Global Administrative Space,” in Collins, Richard and White, Nigel D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy (London: Routledge, 2011), 142–159.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas, “A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy,” (2006) 37 Journal of Social Philosophy 81–107.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas, “Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 119–137.Google Scholar
Claes, Monica and de Visser, Maartje, “Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks,” (2012) 8 Utrecht Law Review 100–114.Google Scholar
Clausen, Jens, Keil, Michael, and Jungwirth, Martin, “The State of EMAS in the EU. Eco-Management as a Tool for Sustainable Development,” (2002) Literature Study (for EMAS II Conference, 26–27 June 2002, Brussels, Belgium).Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald, “Beliefs and Rôles,” (1966–67) 67 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 17–34.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean, Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy and Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael, March, James, and Olsen, Johan, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” (1972) 17 Administrative Science Quarterly 1–25.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stanley, “Crime and Politics: Spot the Difference,” (1996) 47 British Journal of Sociology 1–21.Google Scholar
Colangelo, Anthony, “Spatial Legality,” (2012) 107 Northwestern University Law Review 69–126.Google Scholar
Cortese, Ennio, La Norma Giuridica. Spunti Teorici nel Diritto Comune Classico (Milan: Giuffrè, 1962).Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, “The Concept of Crime and Transnational Networks of Community,” in Mitsilegas, Valsamis, Alldridge, Peter, and Cheliotis, Leonidis (eds.), Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 7–24.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, “Comparative Law and Legal Culture,” in Zimmermann, Reinhard and Reimann, Mathias (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 709–738.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, “Does Global Legal Pluralism Need a Concept of Law?” in Baxi, Upendra, McCrudden, Christopher, and Paliwala, Abdul (eds.), Law’s Ethical, Global and Theoretical Contexts. Essays in Honour of William Twining (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 303–319.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, Living Law: Studies in Legal and Social Theory (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, “International Trade Law: The Impact of Justiciability and Separation of Powers in EC Law,” (2009) 5 European Constitutional Law Review 307.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert, “The Supreme Court 1982 Term. Foreword: Nomos and Narrative,” (1983) 97 Harvard Law Review 4–68.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, “Global Networks and Shared Administration,” in Cassese, Sabino (ed.), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 153–173.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, “The Nature of the Community: Integration, Democracy, and Legitimacy,” in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 3.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of International Law, 8th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Cremona, Marise, “Member States as Trustees of the Union Interest: Participating in International Agreements on Behalf of the European Union,” in Arnull, Anthony, Barnard, Catherine, Dougan, Michael, and Spaventa, Eleanor (eds.), A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in Honour of Alan Dashwood (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 435–457.Google Scholar
Culver, Keith and Giudice, Michael, Legality’s Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Curtin, Deirdre, “Civil Society and the European Union: Opening Spaces for Deliberative democracy,” (1999) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law 185.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., “Federalism and the Democratic Process,” in Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W. (eds.), Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy (New York: New York University Press, 1983), 95–108.Google Scholar
Dang, Tum Lam, “Relation associative: les États Fédérés de Micronésie: les spécificités de l’association,” in Faberon, Jean-Yves et al. (eds.), Destins des Collectivités Politiques d’Océanie, Vol. 1, (Marseille: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 2011), 373–376.Google Scholar
Davies, Gareth T., “The Humiliation of the State as a Constitutional Tactic,” in Amtenbrink, Fabian and van den Berg, Peter (eds.), The Constitutional Integrity of the European Union (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2010), 147–174.Google Scholar
de Búrca, Gráinne, “The ECJ and the International Legal Order: A Re-Evaluation,” in de Búrca, Gráinne and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 105–149.Google Scholar
de Búrca, Gráinne, “The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi,” (2010) 51 Harvard International Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
de Groot, Gerard-René, “Overwegingen over de Janko Rottman – Beslissing van het Europese Hof van Justitie,” (2010) 5–6 Asiel & Migrantenrecht 293–300.Google Scholar
de Groot, Gerard-René, “Towards a European Nationality Law,” (2004) 8 Electronic Journal of Comparative Law.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, “Beyond Neoliberal Governance: The World Social Forum as Subaltern Cosmopolitan Politics and Legality,” in de Sousa Santos, Boaventura and Rodríguez-Garavito, César A. (eds.), Law and Globalization from Below (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 29–63.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, “Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law,” (1987) 14 Journal of Law and Society 279–302.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Toward a New Legal Common Sense, 2nd edn. (London: Butterworths, 2002).Google Scholar
de Wet, Erika, “Judicial Challenges to the Security Council’s Use of Sanctions,” in Farrall, Jeremy and Charlesworth, Hillary (eds.), Strengthening the Rule of Law through the UN Security Council (London: Routledge, 2016), 193–206.Google Scholar
del Mar, Maksymilian, “System Values and Understanding Legal Language,” (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 29–61.Google Scholar
del Ponte, Carla and Sudetic, Chuck, Mevrouw de Aanklager (Amsterdam: Bezige Bij, 2008, Van der Waa, trans.).Google Scholar
del Vecchio, Giorgio, “On the Statuality of Law,” (1937) 19 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 1–20.Google Scholar
Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, “The Quest for Certainty,” reproduced as John Dewey, The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 4 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988, Boydston ed.).Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie, “Towards a Theory of European Union Legal Systems,” in Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 25–53.Google Scholar
Dimitrov, Ivaylo, “Digesting the AG Wathelet Opinion in Case C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV. Is It a Trap?” available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/10/07/digesting-ag-wathelet-opinion-case-c-28416-slowakische-republik-v-achmea-bv-trap.Google Scholar
Dimopoulos, Angelos, EU Foreign Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Dothan, Shai, “How International Courts Enhance Their Legitimacy,” (2013) 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 455–478.Google Scholar
Downie, R. S., Roles and Values: An Introduction to Social Ethics (London: Methuen and Co., 1971).Google Scholar
Driessen, Bart, “Interinstitutional Conventions and Institutional Balance,” (2008) 33 European Law Review 550.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John and Niemeyer, Simon, “Discursive Representation,” (2008) 102 American Political Science Review 481–493.Google Scholar
Dugard, John, “South Africa’s Independent Homelands: An Exercise in Denationalization,” (1980) 10 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 11–36.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis, Homo Aequalis I. Genèse et Épanouissement de l’Idéologie Économique, 2nd edn. (Paris: Gallimard, 1985).Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., “A New Approach to Regime Interaction,” in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 136–174.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Duve, Thomas, “Was ist ‘Multinormativität’? – Einführende Bemerkungen,” (2017) 25 Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History 88–101.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “A New Philosophy for International Law,” (2013) 41 Philosophy and Public Affairs 2–30.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Dyer, L., “Anglo-Saxon Citizenship: A Proposition by Professor Dicey Looking to This End,” (1897) 3 The Barrister 107–110.Google Scholar
Eckert, Julia, “What is the Context of ‘Law in Context’?” in Patrick Dolan, Sean and Heckendorn Urscheler, Lukas (eds.), Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2014), 225–236.Google Scholar
Eckes, Christina, EU Counter-Terrorist Policies and Fundamental Rights: The Case of Individual Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Edward, David, “National Courts: The Powerhouse of Community Law,” (2002–2003) 5 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 1–13.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen, Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts, 4. Aufl. (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, (1989 [1913]).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen, “Montesquieu and Sociological Jurisprudence,” (1916) 26 Harvard Law Review 582–600.Google Scholar
Ekins, Richard, “Judicial Supremacy and the Rule of Law,” (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review 127–152.Google Scholar
Elholm, Thomas and Colson, Renaud, “The Symbolic Purpose of EU Criminal Law,” in Colson, Renaud and Field, Stewart (eds.), EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Diversity. Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom, Security and justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 48–64.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation, Band 2 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976 [1938]).Google Scholar
Eller, Klaas H., “Private Governance of Global Value Chains from Within: Lessons from and for Transnational Law,” (2017) 8 Transnational Legal Theory 296–329.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C., Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy, “The Logic of Freedom and Power,” in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 245–260.Google Scholar
Engle-Merry, Sally, “From Law and Colonialism to Law and Globalization,” (2003) 28 Law and Social Inquiry 569–590.Google Scholar
Eser, Albin, “Book Review: Comparative Concepts of Criminal Law,” (2016) 23 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 375–382.Google Scholar
Eser, Albin, “Grundlagen und Grenzen “stellvertretender Strafrechtspflege,” (§ 7 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 StGB) – Zur Problematik der “identischer Tatnorm” bei Auslandstaten, insbesondere bei Amnestierungen am Tatort,” (1993) Juristenzeitung 875.Google Scholar
Eser, Albin and Heilmann, Brigitte (eds.), Comparative Criminal Law: Development, Aims, Methods (Munich and Oxford: Beck-Hart-Nomos, 2017).Google Scholar
Eser, Albin, Lagodny, Otto, Blakesley, Christopher L. (eds.), The Individual as Subject of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002).Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C., “The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis,” (2002) 1 World Trade Review 7.Google Scholar
Evans, Andrew, “Nationality Law and European Integration,” (1991) 16 European Law Review 190–215.Google Scholar
Everling, Ulrich, “The European Union as a Federal Association of States and Citizens,” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford: Hart, 2006).Google Scholar
Fabbrini, Federico, “The Political Side of EU Citizenship in the Context of EU Federalism,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 271–293.Google Scholar
Fahrmeir, Andreas F., “Nineteenth-Century German Citizenships: A Reconsideration,” (1997) 40 The Historical Journal 721–752.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp, 2006).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, “Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999–1046.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew, Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Dai, Tamada (eds.), Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014).Google Scholar
Fletcher, George, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustin J., The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011).Google Scholar
Francq, Stephanie, “The Scope of Secondary Community Law in the Light of the Methods of Private International Law – Or the Other Way Around?” (2006) 8 Yearbook of Private International Law 333–374.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti: A Critical Analysis for Lawyers and Laymen (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 1961 [1927]).Google Scholar
Freestone, David, “Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area,” (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law 755–760.Google Scholar
French, Duncan, “From the Depths: Rich Pickings of Principles of Sustainable Development and General International Law on the Ocean Floor – The Seabed Disputes Chamber’s 2011 Advisory Opinion,” (2011) 26 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 525–568.Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas L., The World Is Flat: The Globalized World in the Twenty-First Century (New York: Penguin, 2006).Google Scholar
Frison-Roche, Marie-Anne, “Penser le monde à partir de la notion de ‘donnée’,” in Frison-Roche, Marie Anne (ed.), Internet, Espace d’Interrégulation (Paris: Dalloz, 2016), 7–16.Google Scholar
Frydman, Benoit, “Comment penser le droit global?” in Chérot, Jean-Yves and Frydman, Benoit (eds.), La Science du Droit dans la Globalisation (Brussels: Bruylant, 2012), 17–48.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law, 2nd edn. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “On Legal Education,” reproduced in Winston, Kenneth I. (ed.), The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller (Oxford: Hart, 2001), 293–303.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,” (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 630–672.Google Scholar
Gallant, Kenneth, The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Gambaro, Antonio, “Western Legal Tradition,” in Newman, Peter (ed.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics and the Law (New York: Groves Dictionaries Inc., 1998), 687.Google Scholar
Gattinara, G., “Consistnt Interpretations of WTO Rulings in the EU Legal Order,” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo, and Wessel, Ramses (eds.), International Law As Law of the European Union (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), 2012), 269.Google Scholar
Gautier, Philippe, “Le vertus pratiques des obligations générales relatives à l’environnement dans la Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer,” in Boschiero, Nerina, Pitea, Cesare, Ragni, Chiara, and Scovazzi, Tullio (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 365–382.Google Scholar
George, Robert P., Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Gibney, Matthew, “The Rights of Non-Citizens in Political Thought,” in Sawyer, Caroline and Blitz, Brad K. (eds.), Statelessness in the European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 41–68.Google Scholar
Gogarty, Brendan, “Conceptions and (Mis)Conceptions of Science in International Treaties: The ICJ Whaling Case in Context,” (2015) 62 Yearbook of Polar Law 607–622.Google Scholar
Gogarty, Lawrence, “The ICJ Whaling Case: Missed Opportunity to Advance the Rule of Law in Resolving Science-related Disputes in Global Commons?” (2017) 77 Zeitschrift für auslandisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 161–197.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack and Wu, Tim, Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Gongora-Mera, Manuel, Inter-American Judicial Constitutionalism: On the Constitutional Rank of Human Rights Treaties in Latin America through National and Inter-American Adjudication (San José: Inter-American Institute of Human Rights, 2011).Google Scholar
Gordley, James, “Is Comparative Law a Distinct Discipline?” (1998) 46 American Journal of Comparative Law 607–615.Google Scholar
Grandmaison, Olivier, “The Exception and the Rule: On French Colonial Law,” (2006) 53 Diogenes 34–53.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John, “Legal Pluralism,” in Wright, James David (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 13, 2nd edn. (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015), 757–761.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter, Constitutionalism: Past, Present, and Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Law of War and Peace (Oxford: Clarendon, 1925 [1625] Kelsey trans.).Google Scholar
Guerrero-Peniche, Juan, “La opinión consultiva del Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar: Aspectos relativos a la determinación del vínculo efectivo entre los Estados y las personas jurídicas a las que patrocinan para llevar a cabo actividades en la Zona,” (2012) 5 Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional 153–218.Google Scholar
Guèvremont, Véronique, “Traités multilatèraux: nouvelles perspectives relatives à l’articulation,” in Tomkiewicz, Vincent (ed.), Les Sources et les Normes dans le Droit de l’OMC (Paris: Pedone, 2012), 27.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society,” (2008) 15 Constellations 444–455.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, Rehg trans.).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, A Theory of Communicative Action (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1987, McCarthy trans.).Google Scholar
Hafner, Gerhard, “Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law,” (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 849–864.Google Scholar
Hafner, Gerhard, “Risks Ensuing from the Fragmentation of International Law,” in Official Records of the General Assembly, 566 session, Supplement no. 10, 321 (UN Doc A/55/10).Google Scholar
Hale, Brenda, “What’s the Point of Human Rights?” Warwick Law Lecture 2013, 28 November 2013.Google Scholar
Hallevy, Gabriel, A Modern Treatise on the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law, (Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2010).Google Scholar
Handl, Gunther, “Extra-Territoriality and Transnational Legal Authority,” in Handl, Gunther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 3–12.Google Scholar
Handl, Gunther, “Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area: The International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea’s Recent Contribution to International Environmental Law,” (2011) 20 Review of European, Comparative and International Environment Law 208–2013.Google Scholar
Harpaz, Yossi, “Compensatory Citizenship: Dual Nationality as a Strategy of Global Upward Mobility,” (2018) 36 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–20.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593–629.Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon and Dubber, Marcus (eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Henckels, C., “GMOs in the WTO: A Critique of the Panel’s Reasoning in EC–Biotech,” (2006) 12 Melbourne Journal of International Law 278.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Angel, “El principio de integración de los aspectos económicos, sociales y medioambientales del desarrollo sostenibile,” (2012) 64 Revista Española de Derecho Internacional 133–161.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Gleider I., “A Reluctant Guardian: The International Court of Justice and the Concept of International Community,” (2013) 83 British Yearbook of International Law 13–60.Google Scholar
Hinarejos, Alicia, “Extending Citizenship and the Scope of EU Law,” (2011) 70 Cambridge Law Journal 309–312.Google Scholar
Hindelang, Steffen, “The Autonomy of the European Legal Order: EU Constitutional Limits to Investor–State Arbitration on the Basis of Future EU Investment-related Agreements,” (2013) 4 European Yearbook of International Economic Law 187–198.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, “Of the Laws of Nature,” in De Cive (1642), available at unilibrary.com.Google Scholar
Hoekema, André, “European Legal Encounters between Minority and Majority Culture: Cases of Interlegality,” (2005) 51 Journal of Legal Pluralism & Unofficial Law 1–55.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Leonard H., “Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture,” 19 March 2009, available at www.brandeis.edu/ethics/pdfs/internationaljustice/biij/BIIJ2013/hoffmann.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig, “Human Rights and History,” (2016) 232 Past and Present 279–310.Google Scholar
Hogg, Peter W. and Bushell, Allison A., “The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing After All),” (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 75–124.Google Scholar
Hovell, Devika, The Power of Process: The Value of Due process in Security Council Sanctions Decision-Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, “Democracy, Science and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization,” (2000) 98 Michigan Law Review 2329.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, “Human Rights, International Economic Law and ‘Constitutional Justice’: A Reply by Robert Howse to Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann’s Article,” EJILTalk!, 9 December 2008.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, “Montesquieu on Commerce, Conquest, War, and Peace,” (2006) 31 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 693–708.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, “The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary,” (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 9–77.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert and Teitel, Ruti, “Cross-Judging: Tribunalization in a Fragmented but Interconnected Global Order,” (2009) 41 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 959–990.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, Langille, Joanna, and Sykes, Katie, “Pluralism in Practice: Moral Legislation and the Law of the WTO after Seal Products,” (2015) 48 George Washington International Law Review 81.Google Scholar
Hume, David, “On the Standards of Taste,” in Miller, Eugene F. (ed.), Hume: Essays Moral, Political and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985), 11–37.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn, Inventing Human Rights: A History (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2007).Google Scholar
Hunter-Henin, Myriam, “Living Together in an Age of Religious Diversity: Lessons from Baby Loup and SAS,” (2015) 4 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 94–118.Google Scholar
Huntington, S., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas, “The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Extending the Debates,” (2013) 7 Criminal Law and Philosophy 351–365.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan C., Laughing at the Gods: Great Judges and How They Made the Common Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Iglesias Sánchez, Sara, “Hacia una nueva relación entre la nacionalidad estatal y la cuidadanía europea?” (2010) 37 Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 933–950.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael, The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
International Bar Association, Report of the Task Force on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (2009).Google Scholar
Ioannidis, M., “Deference Criteria in WTO Law and the Case for a Procedural Approach,” in Gruszczynski, L. and Werner, W. (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 91.Google Scholar
Isin, Engin and Nielsen, Greg (eds.), Acts of Citizenship (New York: ZED Books, 2008).Google Scholar
Iwawata, Y., “Constitutional Problems Involved in Implementing the Uruguay Round in Japan,” in Jackson, John H. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Implementing the Uruguay Round (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 137.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., “The Great 1994 Sovereignty Debate: United States Acceptance and Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results,” in Jackson, John H., The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 367.Google Scholar
Japp, Klaus-Peter, “Zur Funktion der Menschenrechte in der Weltgesellschaft,” in Heintz, Bettina and Leisering, Britta (eds.), Menschenrechte in der Weltgesellschaft. Deutungswandel und Wirkungsweise eines globalen Leitwerts (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2015), 65–97.Google Scholar
Jaremba, Urszula, National Judges as EU Law Judges: The Polish Civil Law System (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014).Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven L. B., The Making of International Human Rights: The 1960s, Decolonization, and the Reconstruction of Global Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Jessurun d’Oliveira, Hans Ulrich, “Europees burgerschap: Dubbele nationaliteit?” in van Ballegooij, Wouter (ed.), Europees Burgerschap (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2004), 91.Google Scholar
Jessurun d’Oliveira, Hans Ulrich, “Ontkoppeling van nationaliteit en Unieburgerschap?” (2010) Nederlandsch Juristenblad 1028–1033.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian and Neyer, Jurgen, “From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology,” (1997) 3 European Law Journal 273.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, Kjaer, Poul F., and Ralli, Tommi, “A New Type of Conflicts – Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation,” (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 153–166.Google Scholar
Johnson, Tana, Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian, “The Instrumental Turn of Citizenship,” (2018) Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–21.Google Scholar
Kalicki, Jean E. and Joubin-Bret, Anna (eds.), Reshaping the Investor–State Dispute Settlement System – Journeys for the 21st Century (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Perpetual Peace, in Immanuel Kant, Political Writings, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, Reis ed.), 93–130.Google Scholar
Kayaoglu, Turan, “The Extension of Westphalian Sovereignty: State Building and the Abolition of Extraterritoriality,” (2007) 51 International Studies Quarterly 649–675.Google Scholar
Keiler, Johannes and Roef, David (eds.), Comparative Concepts of Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar
Keitner, Chimène and Reisman, W. Michael, “Free Association: The United States Experience,” (2003) 39 Texas International Law Journal 1–64.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. D., “The Dangers of Constitutional Pluralism,” in Avbelj, Matej and Davies, Gareth (eds.), Handbook on Legal Pluralism in the EU (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), 392–406.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (New York: Rinehart & Company Inc., 1952).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967, Knight, trans.).Google Scholar
Kennedy, David, A World of Struggle: How Power Law and Expertise Shape the Global Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kenny, Mel, “Globalization, Interlegality and Europeanized Contract Law,” (2002) 21 Pennsylvania State International Law Review 569–620.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “Social Norms and Agency in Global Politics,” (2010) NYU Straus Institute Working Paper 7.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Victor, David, “The Regime Complex for Climate Change,” (2010) 10–33 Harvard Kennedy School, Discussion Paper, available at www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/Keohane_Victor_Final_2.pdf.Google Scholar
King, Jeff, The Doctrine of Odious Debts in International Law: A Restatement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, “Global Regulation and the New Jus Gentium,” draft paper, available at www.iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Kingsbury-A-New-Jus-Gentium-2006.pdf.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, “The Concept of ‘Law’ in Global Administrative Law,” (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 23–57.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, “International Law as Inter-Public Law,” in Richardson, Henry R. and Williams, Melissa S. (eds.), Nomos XLIX: Moral Universalism and Pluralism, 167–204.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict and Donaldson, Megan, “From Bilateralism to Publicness in International Law,” in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Paulus, Andreas, von Schorlemer, Sabine, and Vedder, Christoph (eds.), Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 79–89.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict and Krisch, Nico, “Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order,” (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 1–13.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B., “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 15–62.Google Scholar
Kirk, Elizabeth, “The Ecosystem Approach and the Search for an Objective and Content for the Concept of Holistic Ocean Governance,” (2015) 46 Ocean Development and International Law 33–49.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul F., “Claim-Making and Parallel Universes: The Legal Pluralism of Church, State and Empire in Europe,” in Davies, Gareth and Avbelj, Matej (eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), 11–21.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul, Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul, “Constitutionalizing Connectivity: The Constitutional Grid of World Society,” 45 Journal of Law and Society 114–134.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul, Between Governing and Governance: On the Emergence, Function and Form of Europe’s Post-national Constellation (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul, “The Transnational Constitution of Europe’s Social Market Economies. A Question of Constitutional Imbalances?” (2018) 57 Journal of Common Market Studies, 143–158.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul, “Why Justification? The Structure of Public Power in Transnational Contexts,” (2017) 8 Transnational Legal Theory 8–21.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Constitutionalism as Theory,” in Dunoff, Jeff and Pollack, Mark (eds.), International Legal Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Doing Justice? Bureaucracy, the Rule of Law and Virtue Ethics,” (2017) 6 Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto 27–50.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “The EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law,” (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 9–82.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Executing Mr Breard,” (1998) 67 Nordic Journal of International Law 357–364.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “In Defense of the Realm,” in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds.), Oxford Principles of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1208–1233.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Legal Education in the Balance: Accommodating Flexibility,” (2006) 56 Journal of Legal Education 196–200.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “The Passion and the Spirit: Albert Camus as Moral Politician,” (2016) 1 European Papers 13–28.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Principled Pragmatist? Bert Röling and the Emergence of International Criminal Law,” in Mégrét, Frédéric and Tallgren, Immi (eds.), The Dawn of a New Discipline (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “The Reception of International Law in the EU Legal Order,” in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1208–1233.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Setting the Scene,” in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 1–44.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “The Sources of International Organizations’ Law: Reflections on Accountability,” in Besson, Samantha and d‘Aspremont, Jean (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 987–1006.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Beyond the Vienna Convention: Conflicting Treaty Provisions,” in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 192–205.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko, “Normative Pluralism: An Exploration,” in Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 13–34.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Knox, John, “A Presumption against Extrajurisdictionality,” (2010) 104 American Journal of International Law 351–396.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “Annotation of Case C-135/08, Rottman,” (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review 1831–1846.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, Citizenship (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “Citizenship of Personal Circumstances in Europe,” in Thym, Daniel (ed.), Reinventing European Citizenship (Oxford: Hart, 2017), 97–136.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “Double Nationality in the EU: An Argument for Tolerance,” (2011) 17 European Law Journal 323–343.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “Ius Tractum of Many Faces: European Citizenship and the Difficult Relationship between Status and Rights,” (2009) 15 Columbia Journal of European Law 169–238.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “Neo-Mediaeval Permutations of Personhood in the European Union,” (2016) European University Institute Working Paper 13.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “Pre-Accession, Naturalization, and ‘Due Regard to Community Law’: The European Union’s ‘Steering’ of Citizenship Policies in Candidate Countries During the Fifth Enlargement,” (2004) 4 Romanian Journal of Political Science 71–88.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “A Real European Citizenship: A New Jurisdiction Test: A Novel Chapter in the Development of the Union in Europe,” (2011) 18 Columbia Journal of European Law 55–110.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “Rounding Up the Circle: The Mutation of Member States’ Nationalities under Pressure from EU Citizenship,” (2010) 23 EUI RSCAS.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, “On Tiles and Pillars: EU Citizenship as a Federal Denominator,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 3–82.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry and Lindeboom, Justin, “Pluralism through Its Denial: The Success of EU Citizenship,” in Avbelj, Matej and Davies, Gareth (eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), 179–198.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry and Lindeboom, Justin, “Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities,” (2017) 4 European Journal of Comparative Law 314–336.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry and Lindeboom, Justin (eds.), Henley and Partners – Kochenov Quality of Nationality Index, 3rd edn. (Zürich: Ideos, 2018).Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry and Belavusau, Uladzislau, “Kirchberg – Dispensing the Punishment: Inflicting ‘Civil Death’ on Prisoners in the Recent Case-Law,” (2016) 40 European Law Review 557–577.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, “The Relationship between the International and the Municipal Legal Order: Reflections on the Decision no 238/2014 of the Italian Constitutional Court,” (2014) Questions of International Law 5–16.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, “Short Reflections on the ICJ’s Whaling Case and the Review by International Courts and Tribunals of ‘Discretionary Powers’,” (2014) 132 Australian Yearbook of International Law 135–144.Google Scholar
Koller, David, “The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law: A Reply to Daniel Bethlehem,” (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 25–29.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Colonial Laws: Sources, Strategies and Lessons?” (2016) 18 Journal of the History of International Law 248–277.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Empire and International Law: The Real Spanish Contribution,” (2011) 61 University of Toronto Law Journal 1–36.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission (Helsinki: Erik Castrén Institute, 2007).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Global Governance and Public International Law,” (2004) 37 Kritische Justiz 241–254.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Global Legal Pluralism: Multiple Regimes and Multiple Modes of Thought,” 5 March 2005, Lecture at Harvard University, available at www.helsinki.fi/eci/Publications/Koskenniemi.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “The Lady Doth Protest Too Much: Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law”. Reprinted in Koskenniemi, Martti (ed.), The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 112–130.Google Scholar
Kostakopoulou, Dora, “European Union Citizenship and Member State Nationality: Updating or Upgrading the Link,” in Shaw, Jo (ed.), Has the European Court of Justice Challenged the Member State Sovereignty in Nationality Law? (Florence: EUI Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies , 2011), 21–26.Google Scholar
Kotze, Louis, “Constitutional Conversations in the Anthropocene: In Search of Environmental Jus Cogens Norms,” (2015) 46 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 241–271.Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, “The European Union in the Global Security Architecture,” in van Vooren, Bart, Blockmans, Steven, and Wouters, Jan (eds.), The EU’s Role in Global Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 81–94.Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, “The Relevance of EU Law for Arbitral Tribunals: (Not) Managing the Lingering Tension,” (2016) 17 Journal of World Investment and Trade 873–894.Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, “The Reform of the Common Commercial Policy,” in Biondi, Andrea, Eeckhout, Piet, and Ripley, Stefanie (eds.), EU Law after Lisbon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 292–311.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Making Sense of ‘International Practices’,” in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) 36–60.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, Praxis: On Acting and Knowing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Re-Thinking Inter-Disciplinarity by Re-Reading Hume,” in Rajkovic, Nikolas, Aalberts, Tanja, and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas (eds.), The Power of Legality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, The Status of Law in International Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods,” (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 1–40.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, “Who Is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space,” (2011) 24 Ratio Juris 386–412.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, “Open Letter to Harlem Desir,” in Kristeva, Julia (ed.), Nations without Nationalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Küçük, Esin, “The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibility: More than Window Dressing?” (2016) 22 European Law Journal 448–469.Google Scholar
Kuisma, Mikko, “Nordic Models of Citizenship: Lessons from Social History for Theorising Policy Change in the ‘Age of Globalisation’,” (2007) 12 New Political Economy 87–95.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola, In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law and Transnational Regulation,” (2011) NYU Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper 1.Google Scholar
Lamy, Pascal, “The Place of the WTO and Its Law in the International Legal Order,” (2007) 17 European Journal of International Law 7.Google Scholar
Larik, Joris, “EU Counter-Terrorism and the ‘Strict Observance of International Law: Sewing the Seamless Coat of Compliance’,” in Herlin-Karnell, Ester and Matera, Claudio (eds.), External Dimension of the EU Counter-terrorism Policy (2014) CLEER Working Paper 2.Google Scholar
Latu, Alex, “Public Procurement and Private Certification: The Case of the UK TPP,” (2013) Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy. Research Paper 53, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2360264.Google Scholar
Lautenbach, Geranne, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press, 2011 [1933]).Google Scholar
Lavranos, Nikolaos, “The Solange-Method as a Tool for Regulating Competing Jurisdictions among International Courts and Tribunals,” (2008) 30 Loyola Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review 275–334.Google Scholar
Le Golf, Pierrick, “Global Law: A Legal Phenomenon Emerging from the Process of Globalization,” (2007) 14 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 119–45.Google Scholar
Leebron, D., “Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results in the United States,” in Jackson, John H. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Implementing the Uruguay Round (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 175.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen and Verhoeven, Amaryllis, “Institutional Balance as a Guarantee for Democracy in EU Governance,” in Joerges, Christian and Dehousse, Renaud (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 35.Google Scholar
Lester, Anthony, “Thirty Years On: The East African Case Revisited,” (2002) 47 Public Law 52–72.Google Scholar
Letsas, George, “Harmonic Law: The Case against Legal Pluralism,” in Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 77–108.Google Scholar
Liberski-Bagnoud, Danouta, Les Dieux du Territoire – Penser Autrement la Généalogie (Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique/Édition de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, 2002).Google Scholar
Liberski-Bagnoud, Danouta, “Règne de la loi, régime des interdits,” in Longo, Giuseppe (ed.), Loi des Dieux, des Hommes et de la Nature (Paris: Fayard, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Lindahl, Hans, Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Liivoja, Rain, “Book Review of Jurisdiction in International Law by Cedric Ryngaert,” (2008) 19 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 397–401.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, “The Misconceived Search for Global Law,” (2017) 8 Transnational Legal Theory 353–359.Google Scholar
Loureiro Bastos, Fernando, “Some Notes on the Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011 of the Sea-Bed Disputes Chamber. Are We in the Presence of a Glimpse of the Future Evolution of the Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea?” in Hereira, José Manuel Sobrino (ed.), The Contribution of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to Good Governance of the Oceans and Seas, Vol. 1, (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2014), 343–362.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, “Jurisdiction,” in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), International Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 335–360.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas, “International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness: General Course on Private International Law,” (1994) 245 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 1–319.Google Scholar
Lowry, Michele and Luedemann, Susanne (eds.), Exemplarity and Singularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature and Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Luban, David, Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Luban, David and Wendel, W. Bradley, “Philosophical Legal Ethics: An Affectionate History,” (2017) 30 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 337–364.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, “Risking Constitutional Collision in Europe?” (1998) 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 517–532.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, “The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now,” (1995) 1 European Law Journal 259–66.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn. (London: Duckworth, 1985).Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask, “Sociological Approaches to International Courts,” in Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J., and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 388–412.Google Scholar
Maier, Hans Gerhard, “Extraterritorial Jurisdiction at a Crossroads: An Intersection between Public and Private International Law,” (1982) 76 American Journal of International Law 280–320.Google Scholar
Maier, Hans Gerhard, “Jurisdictional Rules in Customary International Law,” in Meessen, Karl Matthias (ed.), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Theory and Practice (London: Kluwer, 1996), 64–74.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico, The European Community as a Regulatory State (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar
Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine, “L’enjeu de protection de l’environnement dans l’exploration et l’exploitatione de la Zone: l’apport de l’avis de la Chambre du Tribunal international du droit de la mer du 1er Février 2011,” (2011) 16 Annuaire du Droit de la Mer 367–380.Google Scholar
Mann, Frederick A., “The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited after Twenty Years,” (1984) 186 Recueil des Cours 1–116.Google Scholar
Mann, Frederick A., “The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law,” (1964) 111 Recueil des Cours 1–162.Google Scholar
Manning, Patrick, “The Slave Trade: ‘The Formal Demographics of a Global System’,” in Inikori, Joseph E. and Engerman, Stanley L. (eds.), The Atlantic Slave Trade: Effects on Economies, Societies and Peoples in Africa, the Americas, and Europe (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992), 117–44.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, “A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against ‘Clinical Isolation’ in WTO Dispute Settlement,” (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade 87.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, “Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Jurisdictions: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and the MEAs and Other Treaties,” (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 1081–1131.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, “The Primacy of the WTO Dispute Settlement System,” (2015) Questions of International Law 23.Google Scholar
Markesinis, Basil and Fedke, Jorg, Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law: A New Source of Inspiration? (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas H., Class, Citizenship, and Social Development (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Martin-Bidou, Pascale, “L’affaire de la chasse à la balaine dans l’Antarctique: droit des traités ou protection des especes?” (2015) 119 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 403–417.Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny, The Slave Trade and the Origins of International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Martini, Chiara, “‘States’ Control Over New International Organization,” (2006) 6 Global Jurist Advances 1–25.Google Scholar
Martinico, Giuseppe and Pollicino, Oreste, The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).Google Scholar
Maupin, Julie, “Transparency in International Investment Law: The Good, the Bad, and the Murky,” in Bianchi, Andrea and Peters, Anne (eds.), Transparency in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 142–171.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark, Governing the World. The History of an Idea: 1815 to the Present (London: Penguin, 2013).Google Scholar
Mbengue, Makane, “Between Law and Science: A Commentary on the Whaling in the Antarctic Case,” (2015) 14 Questions of International Law 3–12.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O., “The Appropriate Hierarchy of Global Multilateralism and Customary International Law: The Example of the WTO,” (2003) 42 Virginia Journal of International Law 229.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, Lis Pendens in International Litigation (The Hague: Hague Academy of International Law, 2009).Google Scholar
Mégrét, Frédéric, “International Judges and Experts’ Impartiality and the Problem of Past Declarations,” (2011) 10 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 31–66.Google Scholar
Meili, Friedrich, Die internationalen Unionen über das Recht der Weltverkehrsanstalten und des gesitigen Eigentums (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1889).Google Scholar
Mengozzi, Paolo, “Private International Law and the WTO Law,” (2001) 292 Recueil des Cours 249.Google Scholar
Merli, R., Lucchetti, M. C., Preziosi, M., and Arcese, G., “Motivations behind the EMAS Stagnation and Enabling Measures to Stimulate New Registrations: Characterization of Public Administrations and Private-Owned Organizations,” (2017) available at www.advancesincleanerproduction.net/sixth/files/sessoes/6B/8/merli_r_et_al_academic.pdf.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, “Law and Recognition: Towards a Relational Concept of Law,” in Roughan, Nicole and Halpin, Andrew (eds.), In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, “Territorial Jurisdiction after Territoriality,” in Slot, Piet Jan and Bultermann, Mielle (eds.), Globalisation and Jurisdiction (Leiden: Kluwer, 2004), 105–130.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ICJ Decides the Whaling in the Antarctic Case: Australia Wins, EJILTalk!, 31 March 2014.Google Scholar
Miller, David, “Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification,” (2012) 60 Political Studies 252–68.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., “Good Faith in WTO Dispute Settlement,” (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law 339–371.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, Valsamis, “The European Union and the Global Governance of Crime,” in Mitsilegas, Valsamis, Alldridge, Peter, and Cheliotis, Leonidis (eds.), Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 153–198.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, Valsamis, “Managing Legal Diversity in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice: The Role of Autonomous Concepts,” in Colson, Renaud and Field, Stewart (eds.), EU Criminal Justice and the Challenges of Diversity. Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom, Security and justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 125–159.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, , L’Esprit des Lois in Montesquieu, Oeuvres Complètes, Vol. 2 (Paris: Gallimard La Pléiade, 1951).Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk, “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study,” (1973) 7 Law and Society Review 719–743.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., La Réalité des Normes: En Particulier Normes du Droit International. Fondement d’une Théorie des Norms (Paris: Félix Alcan, 1934).Google Scholar
Mowbray, Alastair, “Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights,” (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 313–341.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald, “Fédéralisme et citoyenneté aux Etats Unis et dans l’Union européenne,” (2003) 21 Critique Internationale 161–169.Google Scholar
Ninatti, S., “How Do Our Judges Conceive of Democracy? The Democratic Nature of the Community Decision-Making Process under Scrutiny of the European Court of Justice,” Jean Monnet Working Paper 10/03.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, “Inside or Out: Two Types of International Legal Pluralism,” in Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 220–239.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, “International Adjudication of Global Public Goods: The Intersection of Substance and Procedure,” (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 769–791.Google Scholar
Note, “Constructing the State Extraterritorially: Jurisdictional Discourse, the National Interest, and Transnational Norms,” (1990) 103 Harvard Law Review 1273–1305.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Charlotte, “I Trade Therefore I Am,” (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 1643–1684.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, “The Dark Side of Human Rights,” in Christiano, Thomas and Christman, John (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy (Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley, 2009), 425–436.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, “Rationalism in Politics,” reproduced in Oakeshott, Michael (ed.), Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (London: Methuen and Co., 1962), 1–36.Google Scholar
Oakley, Justin and Cocking, Dean, Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, Karin, “Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdictions: Problems and Possible Solutions,” (2001) 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 67–104.Google Scholar
Oomen, Barbara, Davis, Martha F., and Grigolo, Michele, Global Urban Justice: The Rise of Human Rights Cities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jurgen (ed.), Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview, 2nd edn. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Padovani, Tullio, “Il crepuscolo della legalità nel processo penale. Riflessioni antistoriche sulle dimensioni processuali della legalità penale,” (1999) 2 L’Indice Penale 527–543.Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, “The (Re-)Constitution of the Public in a Global Arena,” in MacAmlaigh, Cormac, Michelon, Claudio, and Walker, Neil (eds.), After Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 286–308.Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, E Possibile una Legalità Globale? Il Rule of Law e la Governance del Mondo (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2012).Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, “German War Crimes and the Rule of International Law,” (2016) 14 Journal of International Criminal Justice 607–613.Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, “Global Law and the Law on the Globe,” (2012) 1 Italian Journal of Public Law 53–92.Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, “Senza identità. Dal diritto internazionale alla Corte costituzionale tra consuetudine, Jus cogens e principi ‘supremi’,” (2015) 35 Quaderni Costituzionali 815–30.Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, “The Principled and Winding Road to Al Dulimi: Interpreting the Interpreters,” (2014) Questions of International Law 16.Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, “The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal,” in Morlino, Leonardo and Palombella, Gianluigi (eds.), Rule of Law and Democracy. Internal and External Issues (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 1–37.Google Scholar
Palombella, Gianluigi, “The Rule of Law at Home and Abroad,” (2016) 8 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1–23.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers (New York: Free Press, 1968 [1937]).Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, “National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Remarks on the Book by André Nollkaemper),” (2012) 4 Jerusalem Review Legal Studies 5–18.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Pavlakos, George and Pauwelyn, Joost, “Principled Monism and the Normative Conception of Coercion under International Law,” in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), Beyond the Established Legal Orders: Policy Interconnections between the EU and the Rest of the World (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 317–341.Google Scholar
Payandeh, Mehrdad, “The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart,” (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 967–995.Google Scholar
Payne, Cymie, “Biodiversity in High Seas Areas: An Integrated Legal Approach,” (2017) 21 American Society of International Law Insights.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “How to Make the Best out of Sentenza no. 238 of the Italian Constitutional Court for a Global Legal Order,” available at https://verfassungsblog.de/let-not-triepel-triumph-make-best-sentenza-no-238-italian-constitutional-court-global-legal-order-2.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty,” (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 513–544.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization,” (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 671–704.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “Human Rights and International Economic Law in the 21st Century: The Need to Clarify Their Interrelationships,” (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law 3.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “Human Rights, International Economic Law and ‘Constitutional Justice’,” (2008) 18 European Journal of International Law 769.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pineschi, Laura, “The Duty of Environmental Impact Assessment in the First ITLOS Chamber’s Advisory Opinion: Toward the Supremacy of the General Rule to Protect and Preserve the Marine Environment as a Common Value?” in Boschiero, Nerina, Pitea, Cesare, Ragni, Chiara, and Scovazzi, Tullio (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 425–439.Google Scholar
Pitea, Cesare, “Multiplication and Overlap of Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms: Towards Better Coordination?” in Treves, Tullio, Pineschi, Laura, Tanzi, Attila, Pitea, Cesare, Ragni, Chiara, and Jacur, Francesca Romanin (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009), 439–450.Google Scholar
Plakokefalos, Ilias, “Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area,” (2011) 24 Journal of Environmental Law 133–143.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, “Fighting Global Poverty,” (2017) 13 International Journal of Law in Context 512–526.Google Scholar
Poisel, Tim, “Deep Seabed Mining: Implications of Seabed Disputes Chamber’s Advisory Opinion,” (2012) 19 Australian International Law Journal 212–233.Google Scholar
Polakiewicz, Jörg, “International Law and Domestic (Municipal) Law, Law and Decisions of International Organizations and Courts,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Pomponius, Digest, available at https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Anglica/D1_Scott.htm#XIV.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, “Liberal Internationalism and the Populist Backlash,” (2017) University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper 606.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric and Vermeule, Adrian, “The Votes of Other Judges,” (2016) 105 Georgetown Law Journal 159–190.Google Scholar
Post, Robert, “The Challenge of Globalization to American Public Law Scholarship,” (2001) 2 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 323–336.Google Scholar
Powell, Jefferson H., Constitutional Conscience: The Moral Dimension of Judicial Decision (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Pulkowski, Dirk, The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, Ethics without Ontology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav, Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft, 13th edn. (Stuttgart: Koehler Verlag, 1980, Zweigert, ed.).Google Scholar
Ragni, Chiara, “Interpretazione dei trattati e standard of review nella giurisprudenza della Corte internazionale di giustizia: riflessioni sull’affare della caccia alla balena nell’Antartico,” (2014) Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 725–760.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, “Empire and Extraterritoriality in Twentieth Century America,” (2011) 40 Southwestern Law Review 605–615.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, “Governing the Internet,” (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law 491–503.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David, “The Regime Complex of Plant Genetic Resources,” (2004) 58 International Organization 277–309.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception,” (2006) 90 Minnesota Law Review 1003–1044.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Why the State,” (2014) King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series 38.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, “Articles 30 and 59 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in Action: The Decisions on Jurisdiction in the Eastern Sugar and Eureko Investment Arbitrations,” (2012) 39 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 157–177.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, “The Proliferation of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: The Threat of Fragmentation vs. the Promise of a More Effective System? – Some Reflections from the Perspective of Investment Arbitration,” in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 107–125.Google Scholar
Repetto, Giorgio (ed.), The Constitutional Relevance of the ECHR in Domestic and European Law: An Italian Perspective (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2013).Google Scholar
Robert-Cuendet, Sabrina, “Responsabilités et obligations des États qui patronnent des personnes et des entités dans le cadre d’activités menées dans la Zone,” (2011) 57 Annuaire Français de Droit International 439–476.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea “Pledging American Exceptionalism? US Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch on International Law,” available at http://opiniojuris.org/2017/05/23/33125.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., “Four Distinctions that Glanville Williams Did Not Make: The Practical Benefits of Examining the Interrelation among Criminal Law Doctrines,” in Baker, Dennis J. and Horder, Jeremy (eds.), The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: The Legacy of Glanville Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 106–125.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., Garvey, Stephen P., and Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Rödl, Florian, “Democratic Juridification without Statisation: Law of Conflict of Laws Instead of a World State,” (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 193–213.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (New York: W. W. Norton, 2011).Google Scholar
Roele, Isabel, “The Vicious Circle of Habermas’ Cosmopolitanism,” (2014) 25 Law and Critique 199–229.Google Scholar
Röling, B. V. A. and Cassese, Antonio, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond (Cambridge: Polity, 1993).Google Scholar
Rolland, Sonia, “Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand Intervening),” (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 496–502.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Donald and Stephens, Tim, “The Regulation of Southern Ocean Whaling: What Role for the Antarctic Treaty System?” (2009) The University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper 09.Google Scholar
Roughan, Nicole, Authorities: Conflict, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Roughan, Nicole, “Mind the Gaps: Authority and Legality in International Law,” (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 329–335.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Kim and Adler, Daniel, “International Citizenship: The Future of Nationality in a Globalized World,” (2000) 7 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 519–548.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” (1993) 47 International Organization 139–174.Google Scholar
Rundle, Kristen, “The Impossibility of an Exterminatory Legality: Law and the Holocaust,” (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 65–126.Google Scholar
Russo, Deborah, “Addressing the Relation between Treaties by Means of ‘Saving Clauses’,” (2015) 85 British Yearbook of International Law 1–9.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan (eds.), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo, “Diversity and Uniformity in the Law,” (2001) 49 American Journal of Comparative Law 171–190.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, “Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments,” (2009) 9 Human Rights Law Review 397–453.Google Scholar
Sajó, András, “Liberty and its Competitors,” in Uitz, Renata (ed.), Freedom and Its Enemies: The Tragedy of Liberty (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Sajó, András and Uitz, Renata, The Constitution of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Sajó, András and Giuliano, Sergio, “Is the Decline of Globalization the End of Human Rights (as We Believe to Know Them)?” (2017) Annuario di Diritto Comparato e Studi Legislativi 517–536.Google Scholar
Salamanca Agaudo, Esther, “La contribución de la opinión consultiva de la Sala de controverdsias de fondos marinos del Tribunal internacional del derecho del mar a la interpretación y aplicación de la Parte XI de la Convención de Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del mar de 1982 y su Acuerdo de 1994,” in Sobrino Hereira, José Manuel (ed.), The Contribution of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to Good Governance of the Oceans and Seas, Vol. 1, (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2014), 385–406.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean Paul, “Existentialism is a Humanism,” in Kaufman, Walter (ed.), Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre (New York: Plume Books, 1975).Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia, “The State and Globalization,” in Bruce Hall, Rodney and Biersteker, Thomas J. (eds.), The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 91–113.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Savino, Mario, “Linkages between Global Regimes and Interactions with Civil Society,” in Cassese, Sabino (ed.), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 131–152.Google Scholar
Schabas, William, The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Schaltegger, Stephan, Bennett, Martin, Burritt, Roger L., and Jasch, Christine (eds.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production (Heidelberg: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar
Schiek, Dagmar, “Perspectives on Social Citizenship in the EU,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 341–370.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Rudolph (ed.), Schlesinger’s Comparative Law. Cases–Text–Materials, 4th edn. (Mineola NY: The Foundation Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Der Nomos der Erde. Im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1950).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Ex Captivitate Salus: Experiences, 1945–1947 (Cambridge: Polity, 2017, Hannah, trans.).Google Scholar
Schönberger, Christoph, “European Citizenship as Federal Citizenship,” (2007) 19 European Review of Public Law 61–81.Google Scholar
Schönberger, Christoph, Unionsbürger. Europas föderales Bürgerrecht in vergleichender Sicht (Heidelberg: Mohr Siebeck, 2006).Google Scholar
Schultz, Thomas “Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface,” (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 799–839.Google Scholar
Schultz, Thomas Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Schütze, Robert, “The ‘Succession Doctrine’ and the European Union,” in Arnull, Anthony, Barnard, Catherine, Dougan, Michael, and Spaventa, Eleanor (eds.), A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in Honour of Alan Dashwood (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 459–484.Google Scholar
Scoditti, Enrico, “Corti e Carte dei diritti,” (2013) 2 Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto 379–400.Google Scholar
Scott Joanne, , “The GATT and Community Law: Rethinking the ‘Regulatory Gap’,” in Shaw, Jo and More, Gillian (eds.), New Legal Dynamics of European Union (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 147.Google Scholar
Scott Joanne, , “The New EU ‘Extraterritoriality’,” (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1343–1380.Google Scholar
Scott, Karen, “International Environmental Governance: Managing Fragmentation through Institutional Connection,” (2011) 12 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1–40.Google Scholar
Scovazzi, Tullio, “Between Law and Science: Some Considerations Inspired by the Whaling in the Antarctic Judgment,” (2015) 14 Questions of International Law 13–30.Google Scholar
Senden, Linda, “Soft Law and Its Implications for Institutional Balance in the EC,” (2005) 1 Utrecht Law Review 79.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, The Birthright Lottery (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, “International Law and Global Public Goods in a Legal Pluralist World,” (2012) 12 European Journal of International Law 669–693.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Ginsburg, Tom, “The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship,” (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 1–46.Google Scholar
Shamir-Borer, Eran, “Legitimacy without Authority in Global Standardisation Governance: The Case of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO),” in Cassese, S. et al. (eds.), Global Administrative Law: The Casebook (e-book, 2012), available at www.irpa.eu/en/gal-section/global-administrative-law-the-casebook-2.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin, “The Globalization of Law,” (1993) 1 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 37–64.Google Scholar
Sherman, Gordon E., “Jus Gentium and International Law,” (1918) 12 American Journal of International Law 56–63.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith, Legalism: Law Morals and Political Trials (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Simester, Andrew, Du Bois-Pedain, Antije, and Neumann, Ulfrid (eds.), Liberal Criminal Theory: Essays for Andreas von Hirsch (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Simon Thomas, Marc, The Challenge of Legal Pluralism: Local Dispute Settlement and the Indian-State Relationship in Ecuador (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Simon, Roberts, “After Government? On Representing Law without the State,” (2005) 68 Modern Law Review 1–24.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Guy Fiti, To Reform the World: International Organizations and the Making of Modern States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Sironi, Alice, “Nationality of Individuals in Public International Law,” in Forlati, Serena and Annoni, Alessandra (eds.), The Changing Role of Nationality in International Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), 54–76.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Skordas, Achilles, “Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit as Comity and the Disquiet of Neoformalism: A Response to Jan Klabbers,” in Koutrakos, Panos (ed.), European Foreign Policy: Legal and Political Perspectives (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 115–144.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “Judicial Globalization,” (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law 1103–1124.Google Scholar
Smiley, Marion, Moral Responsibility and the Boundaries of Community (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis, “The Construction of Relations between Sites of Governance: The European Courts and WTO Law,” in Snyder, Francis (ed.), The EU, the WTO and China: Legal Pluralism and International Trade Regulation (Oxford: Hart, 2010), 151–208.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., “A Virtue-Centered Account of Equity and the Rule of Law,” in Farrelly, Colin and Solum, Lawrence B. (eds.), Virtue Jurisprudence (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008), 142–166.Google Scholar
Song, Nianshen, “‘Tributary’ from a Multilateral and Multilayered Perspective,” (2012) 5 Chinese Journal of International Politics 155–182.Google Scholar
Sousa, Pedro Caro, “Is a Unified Approach to EU Fundamental Freedoms Justified?” (2014) 20 European Law Journal 499–519.Google Scholar
Spano, Robert, “Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity,” (2014) 14 Human Rights Law Review 487–502.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter J., At Home in Two Countries (New York: New York University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter J., “Dual Nationality and the Meaning of Citizenship,” (1997) 46 Emory Law Journal 1411–1486.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter J., “Stakeholder Theory Won’t Save Citizenship,” in Baubock, Rainer et al. (eds.), Democratic Inclusion (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017), 204–224.Google Scholar
Staker, Christopher, “Jurisdiction,” in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), International Law, 4th ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 309–335.Google Scholar
Steger, Debra, “Canadian Interpretation of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization,” in Jackson, John H. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Implementing the Uruguay Round (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 243.Google Scholar
Stephan, Paul, “Competing Sovereignty and Laws’ Domains,” (2017) Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper 4.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B., “Global Standards for National Societies,” in Cassese, Sabino (ed.), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 175–196.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. and Badin, Michelle Ratton Sanchez, “The World Trade Organization and Global Administrative Law,” (2009) NYU Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper 7.Google Scholar
Strik, Philip, Shaping the Single European Market in the Field of Foreign Direct Investment (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Strumia, Francesca, “Citizenship and Free Movement: European and American Features of a Judicial Formula for Increased Comity,” (2006) 12 Columbia Journal of European Law 713–750.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain, Homo Juridicus: Essai sur la Fonction Anthropologique du Droit (Paris: Points, 2005).Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain, “The Territorial Inscription of Laws,” in Calliess, Graf-Peter, Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, Wielsch, Dan, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag am 30. April 2009 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009), 375–393.Google Scholar
Surak, Kristin, “Global Citizenship 2.0. The Growth of Citizenship by Investment Programs,” (2016) Investment Migration Working Paper 3.Google Scholar
Szpunar, Maciej and López, Maria Esther Blas, “Some Reflections on Member State Nationality: A Prerequisite of EU Citizenship and an Obstacle to Its Enjoyment,” in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 107–124.Google Scholar
Tabau, Anne-Sophie and Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine, “Non-Compliance Mechanisms: Interaction between the Kyoto Protocol System and the European Union,” (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 749–763.Google Scholar
Taekema, Sanne, “Fragments and Continuities of Law and ICT: A Pragmatist Approach to Understanding Legal Pluralism,” in de Been, Wouter, Arora, Payal, and Hildebrandt, Mireille (eds.), Crossroads in New Media, Identity and Law: The Shape of Diversity to Come, (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 80–92.Google Scholar
Taekema, Sanne, “Private Law as an Open Legal Order: Understanding Contract and Tort as Interactional Law,” (2014) 43 Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 140–149.Google Scholar
Taekema, Sanne and van der Burg, Wibren, “Towards a Fruitful Cooperation between Legal Philosophy, Legal Sociology and Doctrinal Research: How Legal Interactionism May Bridge Unproductive Oppositions,” in Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David (eds.), Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014), 129–145.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Yoshifumi, “Obligations and Liability of Sponsoring States Concerning Activities in the Area: Reflections on the ITLOS Advisory Opinion on 1 February 2011,” (2013) 60 Netherlands International Law Review 205–230.Google Scholar
Tancredi, Antonello, “OMC et coutume(s),” in Tomkiewicz, Vincent (ed.), Les Sources et les Normes dans le Droit de l’OMC (Paris: Pedone, 2012), 81.Google Scholar
Tancredi, Antonello, “On the Absence of Direct Effect of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body’s Decisions in the EU Legal Order,” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo, and Wessel, Ramses (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), 249.Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter James, “The State as Container: Territoriality in the Modern World-System,” (1994) 18 Progress in Human Geography 151–162.Google Scholar
Terris, Daniel, Romano, Cesare, and Swigart, Leigh, The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World’s Cases (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997), 3–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies,” (1998) 61 Modern Law Review 11–32.Google Scholar
Timmermans, Christiaan W. A., “Lifting the Veil of Union Citizens’ Rights,” in Colneric, Ninon et al. (eds.), Festschrift für Gil Carlos Rodríguez Iglesias (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2003), 195–206.Google Scholar
Toner, Helen, “Case C-192/99, R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Kaur,” (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 881–893.Google Scholar
Toth, Orsolya, The Lex Mercatoria in Theory and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen J., The Place of Reason in Ethics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986 [1950]).Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., “Bananas, Direct Effect and Compliance,” (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 660.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., “The Domain of WTO Law,” (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333.Google Scholar
Treves, Tullio, “Vue d’ensemble sur l’avis consultatif du 1er Février 2011,” (2011) Annuaire du Droit de la Mer 343–350.Google Scholar
Trnavci, Genc, “The Meaning and Scope of the Law of Nations in the Context of the Alien Tort Claims Act and International Law,” (2005) 26 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 193–266.Google Scholar
Trubek, David and Cottrell, Patrick, “Robert Hudec and the Theory of International Economic Law: The Law of Global Space in Developing Countries,” in Thomas, Chantal and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.), Developing Countries in the WTO Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 129–150.Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, Alina, “Redefining the Outer Boundaries of EU Law: The Zambrano, McCarthy and Dereci Trilogy,” (2012) 18 European Public Law 493–526.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Twining, William, “Diffusion and Globalization Discourse,” (2006) 47 Harvard International Law Journal 507.Google Scholar
Twining, William, Globalisation and Legal Scholarship (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana, Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
van der Burg, Wibren, The Dynamics of Law and Morality. A Pluralist Account of Legal Interactionism (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014).Google Scholar
van der Mei, Anne P., “Freedom of Movement for Indigents: A Comparative Analysis of American Constitutional Law and European Community Law,” (2002) 19 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 803–862.Google Scholar
van Domselaar, Iris, The Fragility of Rightness: Adjudication and the Primacy of Practice (doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2014).Google Scholar
van Domselaar, Iris, “Moral Quality in Adjudication: On Judicial Virtues and Civic Friendship,” (2015) 44 Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 24–46.Google Scholar
van Domselaar, Iris, “A Neo-Aristotelian Notion of Reciprocity: About Civic Friendship and (the Troublesome Character of) Right Judicial Decision,” in Huppes-Cluysenaer, Liesbeth and Coelho, Nuno M.M.S. (eds.), Aristotle and the Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 223–248.Google Scholar
van Elsuwege, Peter, “Shifting Boundaries? European Union Citizenship and the Scope of Application of EU Law,” (2011) 38 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 263–276.Google Scholar
van Hoof, Luc, “Fisheries Management, the Ecosystem Approach, Regionalisation and the Elephants in the Room,” (2015) 60 Marine Policy, 20–26.Google Scholar
van Rossum, Wibo, “Religious Courts alongside Secular State Courts: The Case of the Turkish Alevis,” (2008) 2 Social Justice & Global Development Journal.Google Scholar
Varella, Marcelo D., Internationalization of Law: Globalization, International Law and Complexity (Berlin: Springer, 2014).Google Scholar
Varese, Federico, Mafias on the Move. How Organized Crime Conquers New Territories (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Veitch, Scott, Law and Irresponsibility: On the Legitimation of Human Suffering (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law,” (1966) 60 American Journal of International Law 55–63.Google Scholar
Visek, Richard C., “Creating Ethnic Electorate through Legal Restorationism: Citizenship Rights in Estonia,” (1997) 38 Harvard International Law Journal 315–374.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik, “Competition and Complementarity between Global and Regional Human Rights Institutions,” (2017) 8 Global Policy 119–123.Google Scholar
von Liszt, Friedrich‚ Gutachten für die internationale kriminalistische Vereinigung,” (1893), reprinted in von Liszt, Friedrich (ed.), Strafrechtliche Aufsätze und Vorträge, Vol. II (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1905).Google Scholar
Voronina, Natalia, “‘Sojuznoje gosudarstvo Rossija – Belarus’: opyt pravovogo regulirovanija,” (2013) 3 NB: Mezhdunarodnoje Parvo 52.Google Scholar
Wagner, Markus, “Regulatory Space in International Trade Law and International Investment Law,” (2015) 35 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 57.Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael et al. (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (The Hague: Kluwer, 2010).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “The Core Case against Judicial Review,” (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1346–1406.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium,” (2005) 119 Harvard Law Review 129–147.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “International Law: ‘A Relatively Small and Unimportant’ Part of Jurisprudence?” (2013) NYU Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers 427.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Ius Gentium: A Defense of Gentili’s Equation of the Law of Nations and the Law of Nature,” (2008) Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series 08/34.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Legal Pluralism and the Contrast between Hart’s Jurisprudence and Fuller’s,” in Cane, Peter (ed.), The Hart–Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Special Ties and Natural Justice,” (1993) 22 Philosophy and Public Affairs 3–30.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, “Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders,” (2006) 8 International Constitutional Law Journal 373–396.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wang, Dong, “The Discourse of Unequal Treaties in Modern China,” (2003) 76 Pacific Affairs 399–425.Google Scholar
Warbrick, Colin, “The Jurisdiction of the Security Council: Original Intention and New World Order(s),” in Capps, Patrick, Evans, Malcolm, and Konstadinidis, Stratos (eds.), Asserting Jurisdiction: International and European Perspectives (Oxford: Hart, 2003), 127–143.Google Scholar
Web, Philippa, International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick, The Sovereign Citizen (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H., “The Geology of International Law: Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy,” (2004) 64 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 547–562.Google Scholar
Wenk, Michael S., The European Union’s Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005).Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick, “Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem,” in Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy (1983) 13–47.Google Scholar
White, Jonathan, “Authority after Emergency Rule,” (2015) 78 Modern Law Review 585–610.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Tom, “Cameron Vows to Defy Europe on Prisoner Voting,” The Telegraph, 24 May 2012, available at www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9285408/Cameron-vows-to-defy-Europe-on-prisoner-voting.html.Google Scholar
Wijffels, Alain, “Bringing Peripheries into Focus,” in d’Argent, Pierre (ed.), Droit des Frontières Internationals (Paris: Pedone, 2016), 43–55.Google Scholar
Willems, Vera (2017), “International Courts and Tribunals and Their Linguistic Practices: A Communities of Practice Approach,” (2017) 30 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 181–199.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, “Justice as a Virtue,” in Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), 189–199.Google Scholar
Worster, William Thomas, “Competition and Comity in the Fragmentation of International Law,” (2009) 34 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 119–150.Google Scholar
Xifaras, Mikhail, “The Global Turn in Legal Theory,” (2016) 29 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 215–243.Google Scholar
Yee, Sienho, “A Call for a More Rigorous Assessment of Universal Jurisdiction,” (2013) 107 ASIL Proceedings 242–5.Google Scholar
Zekoll, Joachim, “Jurisdiction in Cyberspace,” in Handl, Gunther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 341–369.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Implementation of the WTO Agreements in China (London: Wildy, Simmons and Hill Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas, “International Law and ‘Cyber Space’,” (2014) 3 ESIL Reflections.Google Scholar
Zincone, Giovanna and Basili, Marzia, “Country Report: Italy,” RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2010/35 (2010).Google Scholar
Zoppo, Laura, La Soluzione delle Controversie Commerciali tra Stati tra Multilaterismo e Regionalismo (Naples: Jovene, 2013).Google Scholar
Zuleeg, Manfred, “Demokratie und Wirtschaftsverfassung in der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs,” (1982) 16 Europarecht 21.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer, “The Regulatory Landscape of Global Governance and Transnational Legal Authority,” in Handl, Gunther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 551–558.Google Scholar
Zurn, Michael, “Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems,” in Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (eds.), Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 260–287.Google Scholar
Zurn, Michael, “Introduction: Law and Compliance at Different Levels,” in Zurn, Michael and Joerges, Christian (eds.), Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance Beyond the Nation-State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 1–39.Google Scholar