Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:10:27.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Conclusions

Building Multinationals in Emerging Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2018

Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Miguel A. Montoya
Affiliation:
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Guadalajara
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Mexican Multinationals
Building Multinationals in Emerging Markets
, pp. 677 - 715
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Awate, S., Larsen, M. & Mudambi, R. 2012. EMNE catch-up strategies in the wind turbine industry: is there a trade-off between output and innovation capabilities? Global Strategy Journal, 2, 205223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99120.Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bilkey, W. J. & Nes, E. 1982. Country-of-origin effects on products evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1): 8999.Google Scholar
Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A. & Maksimovic, V. 2001. Capital structures in developing countries. Journal of Finance, 56(1): 87130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capron, L. & Mitchell, W. 2012. Build, Borrow, or Buy: Solving the Growth Dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Castanias, R. P. & Helfat, C. E. 1991. Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17: 155171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2012. How the analysis of developing country multinational companies helps advance theory: Solving the Goldilocks debate. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 153167.Google Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2015. The co-evolution of pro-market reforms and emerging market multinationals, in Tihanyi, L., Banalieva, E., Devinney, T. M. & Pedersen, T. (Eds.), Advances in International Management 28: Emerging Economies and Multinational Enterprises. Emerald.Google Scholar
del Sol, P. & Kogan, J. 2007. Regional competitive advantage based on pioneering economic reforms: the case of Chilean FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6): 901927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M. & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 249267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymer, S. H. 1976. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8: 2332.Google Scholar
Khanna, T. & Palepu, K. 2010. Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Knickerbocker, F. T. 1973. Oligopolistic Reaction and the Multinational Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lessard, D. R. & Lucea, R. 2009. Mexican multinationals: Insights from CEMEX, in Ramamurti, R. & Singh, J. V. (Eds.), Emerging Multinationals from Emerging Markets. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McMullen, S. M., Mauch, J. E. & Donnorummo, B. 2000. The Emerging Markets and Higher Education: Development and Sustainability. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Montgomery, C. A. (Ed.) 1995. Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2017. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2016. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Oviatt, B. M. & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1): 4564.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A. & Jolibert, A. J. P. 1995. A Meta-Analysis of Country-of-Origin Effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 883900.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. 2005. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Business School Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. & Doz, Y. L. 1987. The Multinational Mission. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ramamurti, R. 2012. What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 4147.Google Scholar
Rugman, A. M. (Ed.). 2009. The Oxford Handbook of International Business. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tallman, S. B. & Yip, G. S. 2009. Strategy and the multinational enterprise, in Rugman, A. M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1977. The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Transfer Cost of Technology Transfer. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1999. World Development Report 1998/99: Knowledge for Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018. Worldwide governance indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home. Accessed April 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 341363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M. 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 56, 11851199.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×