Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Natural Law and the Nature of Law , pp. 247 - 258Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Works Cited
Alexander, Larry, and Kress, Ken, ‘Against Legal Principles’ (1997) 82 Iowa Law Review 739.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, ‘Effects of Defects – Action or Argument?’ (2006) 19 Ratio Juris 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert, ‘An Answer to Joseph Raz’ in Pavlakos, George (ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Hart, 2007).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, ‘On the Concept and the Nature of Law’ (2008) 21 Ratio Juris 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiae.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , ‘Parts of Animals’ (trans. Ogle, W.), in McKeon, R. (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle (Random House, 1941).Google Scholar
Augustine, , On Free Choice of the Will.Google Scholar
Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1954).Google Scholar
Baker, Lynne Rudder, ‘The Ontology of Artifacts’ (2004) 7 Philosophical Explorations 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lynne Rudder, The Metaphysics of Everyday Life: An Essay in Practical Realism (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, M. E., and Komatsu, L. K., ‘Defining Features of Natural Kinds and Artifacts’ (1989) 18 Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 433.Google Scholar
Batagol, Becky, and Brown, Thea, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Family Mediation (Federation Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Beis, Richard H., ‘Some Contributions of Anthropology to Ethics’ (1964) 28 The Thomist 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., ‘Cosmopolitanism and Global Justice’ (2005) 9 Journal of Ethics 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, Henri, The Creative Mind (Philosophical Library, trans. Andison, Mabelle L., 1946).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul, ‘Intention, History and Artifact Concepts’ (1996) 60 Cognition 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, Joseph. M., ‘Toward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect’ (1980) 90 Ethics 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Joseph, ‘The Absolute Prohibition of Lying and the Origins of the Casuistry of Mental Reservation: Augustinian Arguments and Thomistic Developments’ (1999) 44 American Journal of Jurisprudence 43.Google Scholar
Bradley, Gerard V., and George, Robert P., ‘The New Natural Law Theory: A Reply to Jean Porter’ (1994) 39 American Journal of Jurisprudence 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B., ‘In-Group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation’ (1979) 86 Psychological Bulletin 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, David O., ‘Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation and Judicial Review’ (1988) 17 Philosophy and Public Affairs 105.Google Scholar
Brink, David O., ‘Legal Interpretation, Objectivity and Morality’ in Leiter, Brian (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Broad, C. D., ‘The “Nature” of a Continuant’ in Feigl, H. and Sellars, W. (eds.), Readings in Philosophical Analysis (Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949).Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 6th edn, 2003).Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., ‘What Should Economists Do?’ (1964) 30 Southern Economic Journal 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon, The Calculus of Consent (Liberty Fund, 2004).Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler, ‘Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950–1990’ (1992) 101 Philosophical Review 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrara, Massimiliano, and Vermaas, Pieter E., ‘The Fine-Grained Metaphysics of Artifactual and Biological Functional Kinds’ (2009) 169 Synthese 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Sophie Grace, Understanding Human Goods (Edinburgh University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Sophie Grace, ‘The Polymorphy of Practical Reason’ in Oderberg, David S. and Chappell, Sophie Grace (eds.), Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law (Palgrave, 2005).Google Scholar
Chartier, Gary, ‘Toward a Consistent Natural Law Ethics of False Assertion’ (2006) 43 American Journal of Jurisprudence 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, Gary, Economic Justice and Natural Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, Gary, ‘Incommensurable Basic Goods’ (2015) 40 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1.Google Scholar
Christman, John, ‘Liberalism and Individual Positive Freedom’ (1991) 101 Ethics 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, , De Legibus.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlisk, John, ‘Why Bounded Rationality?’ (1996) 34 Journal of Economic Literature 669.Google Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, ‘Levinasian Ethics and Legal Obligation’ (2006) 19 Ratio Juris 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, ‘Levinasian Ethics and the Concept of Law’ in Manderson, Desmond (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, ‘Levinas on Shared Ethical Judgments’ (2011) 42 Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, ‘Pre-Reflective Law’ in Del Mar, Maksymilian (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Law (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, ‘Clarifying the Natural Law Thesis’ (2012) 37 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 159.Google Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, ‘Between Morality and Efficacy: Reclaiming the Natural Law Theory of Lon Fuller’ (2014) 5 Jurisprudence 109.Google Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, and Jedličková, Barbora, ‘What’s Wrong with Cartels?’ (2016) 44 Federal Law Review 401.Google Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, and Stephenson, Peta, ‘An Express Constitutional Right to Vote? The Case for Reviving Section 41’ (2014) 36 Sydney Law Review 205.Google Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, and Weston-Scheuber, Kylie, Principles of International Humanitarian Law (Edward Elgar, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, Jonathan, Field, Rachael, Toohey, Lisa, Partridge, Helen and McAllister, Lynn, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Folk Law: Expanding the Concept of the Shadow of the Law in Family Dispute Resolution’ (2018) 40 Sydney Law Review 319.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., ‘Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker’ (1957) 6 Journal of Public Law 279.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman, ‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics’ (1979) 76 Journal of Philosophy 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman, ‘Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Points’ (1980) 10 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davitt, Thomas E., The Basic Values in Law: A Study of the Ethico-Legal Implications of Psychology and Anthropology (American Philosophical Society, 1968).Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, Bergsonism (Zone Books, trans. Tomlinson, Hugh and Habberjam, Barbara, 1991).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology (Johns Hopkins University Press, trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, 1976).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Limited Inc (Northwestern University Press, trans. Weber, Samuel, 1988).Google Scholar
Detmold, Michael, The Unity of Law and Morality: A Refutation of Legal Positivism (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984).Google Scholar
Doyle, Adrian Conan, and Carr, John Dickson, The Exploits of Sherlock Holmes (Gramercy, 1999).Google Scholar
Dupré, Louis, ‘The Common Good and the Open Society’ (1993) 55 Review of Politics 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile, The Rules of Sociological Method (Free Press, trans. Solovay, Sarah A. and Mueller, John H., 1964).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘The Original Position’ in Daniels, Norman (ed.), Reading Rawls (Stanford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Response’ in Hershovitz, Scott (ed.), Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Kenneth, ‘Defending the Possibility of a Neutral Functional Theory of Law’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, Kenneth, ‘Functions in Jurisprudential Methodology’ (2013) 8 Philosophy Compass 447.Google Scholar
Ekins, Richard, and Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘The Reality and Indispensability of Legislative Intention’ (2014) 36 Sydney Law Review 39.Google Scholar
Elder, Crawford L., ‘On the Place of Artifacts in Ontology’ in Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, Rights, Justice and the Bounds of Liberty (Princeton University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Rachael, and Crowe, Jonathan, ‘Playing the Language Game of Family Mediation: Implications for Mediator Ethics’ (2017) 35 Law in Context 84.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘Some Professorial Fallacies about Rights’ (1972) 4 Adelaide Law Review 377.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion: A Reply to Judith Thomson’ (1973) 2 Philosophy and Public Affairs 117.Google ScholarPubMed
Finnis, John, ‘Law, Morality and “Sexual Orientation”’ (1994) 69 Notre Dame Law Review 1049.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘Is Natural Law Compatible with Limited Government?’ in George, Robert P. (ed.), Natural Law, Liberalism and Morality (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘The Good of Marriage and the Morality of Sexual Relations: Some Philosophical and Historical Observations’ (1998) 42 American Journal of Jurisprudence 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘Describing Law Normatively’ in Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays, vol. IV (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Intention and Identity: Collected Essays, vol. II (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘Law as Coordination’ in Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays, vol. IV (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘Law’s Authority and Social Theory’s Predicament’ in Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays, vol. IV (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2011).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘The Truth in Legal Positivism’ in Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays, vol. IV (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin, Ravizza, Mark and Copp, David, ‘Quinn on Double Effect: The Problem of “Closeness”’ (1993) 103 Ethics 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley, ‘Still Wrong after All These Years’ (1987) 6 Law and Philosophy 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa, ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect’ in Virtues and Vices (University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Fortin, Ernest L., ‘The New Rights Theory and the Natural Law’ (1982) 44 Review of Politics 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freimuth, Marilyn, Moniz, Sandy and Kim, Shari R., ‘Clarifying Exercise Addiction: Differential Diagnosis, Co-Occurring Disorders and Phases of Addiction’ (2011) 8 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 4069.Google Scholar
Friedman, David, ‘Anarchy and Efficient Law’ in Sanders, John and Narveson, Jan (eds.), For and against the State (Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (Sheed and Ward, trans. Barden, Garrett and Cumming, John, 1979).Google Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘Law’s Aim in Law’s Empire’ in Hershovitz, Scott (ed.), Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
George, Robert P., ‘Recent Criticism of Natural Law Theory’ (1988) 55 University of Chicago Law Review 1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, Alan, ‘Are There Any Absolute Rights?’ in Waldron, Jeremy (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan, ‘What’s Morally Special about Free Exchange?’ (1985) 2 Social Philosophy and Policy 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, Peter, ‘Seeing What Is the Kind Thing to Do: Perception and Emotion in Morality’ (2007) 61 Dialectica 347.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Implications in Language, Law and the Constitution’ in Lindell, Geoffrey (ed.), Future Directions in Australian Constitutional Law (Federation Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Constitutional Implications and Freedom of Political Speech: A Reply to Stephen Donaghue’ (1997) 23 Monash University Law Review 362.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Originalism in Constitutional Interpretation’ (1997) 25 Federal Law Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism’ (2009) 4 Philosophy Compass 682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘Original Meanings and Contemporary Understandings in Constitutional Interpretation’ in Lee, H. P. and Gerangelos, Peter, Constitutional Advancement in a Frozen Continent (Federation Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, ‘The Case for Originalism’ in Huscroft, Grant and Miller, Bradley (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Golemboski, David, ‘Federalism and the Catholic Principle of Subsidiarity’ (2015) 45 Publius 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso, Morality and the Human Goods (Georgetown University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A., ‘The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary’ (1993) 7 Studies in American Political Development 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie, ‘Law, Co-Ordination and the Common Good’ (1983) 3 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain, ‘The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1–2, Question 94, Article 2’ (1965) 10 Natural Law Forum 168.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain, The Way of the Lord Jesus: Christian Moral Principles (Franciscan Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain, ‘Natural Law and Natural Inclinations: Some Comments and Clarifications’ (1987) 6 New Scholasticism 307.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain, Boyle, Joseph M. and Finnis, John, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain, Boyle, Joseph M. and Finnis, John, ‘Practical Principles, Moral Truth and Ultimate Ends’ (1987) 32 American Journal of Jurisprudence 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain, Boyle, Joseph, Finnis, John and May, William, ‘Every Marital Act Ought to Be Open to New Life: Toward a Clearer Understanding’ (1988) 52 The Thomist 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment’ (2001) 108 Psychological Review 814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, Jonathan, ‘“Dialogue between My Head and My Heart”: Affective Influences on Moral Judgment’ (2002) 13 Psychological Inquiry 54.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, ‘The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology’ (2007) 316 Science 998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, Roy, Saussure and His Interpreters (Edinburgh University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Introduction’ in Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1954).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A., ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’ (1945) 35 American Economic Review 519.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time (Harper and Row, trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward, 1962).Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hilpinen, Risto, ‘Authors and Artifacts’ (1993) 93 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hittinger, Russell, A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory (Notre Dame University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Hittinger, Russell, ‘Social Roles and the Ruling Virtues in Catholic Social Doctrine’ (2002) 16 Annales Theologici 295.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, ‘Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1917) 26 Yale Law Journal 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank, ‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’ (1982) 32 American Philosophical Quarterly 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (Russell and Russell, trans. Wedberg, Anders, 1961).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press, trans. Knight, M., 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Liam, ‘The First Agricultural Revolution: Property Rights in Their Place’ (1982) 56 Agricultural History 379.Google Scholar
Keown, John, and George, Robert P. (eds.), Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinig, John, ‘Ticking Bombs and Torture Warrants’ (2005) 10 Deakin Law Review 614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary, ‘Referring to Artifacts’ (1980) 89 Philosophical Review 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian, ‘The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Scepticism’ (2011) 31 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold, ‘Defining Art Historically’ (1979) 19 British Journal of Aesthetics 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold, ‘Artworks as Artifacts’ in Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Lewis, David, ‘Dispositional Theories of Value’ (1989) 63 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 113.Google Scholar
Liao, S. Matthew, ‘The Closeness Problem and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Way Forward’ (2016) 10 Criminal Law and Philosophy 849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisska, Anthony, Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction (Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Lumb, R. D., ‘The Scholastic Doctrine of Natural Law’ (1959) 2 Melbourne University Law Review 205.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen, ‘Against the Old Sexual Morality of the New Natural Law’ in George, Robert P. (ed.), Natural Law, Liberalism and Morality (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C. Jr, ‘Negative and Positive Freedom’ (1967) 76 Philosophical Review 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, ‘Natural Law and the Separation of Law and Morals’ in George, Robert P. (ed.), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays (Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, and Weinberger, Ota, An Institutional Theory of Law (Reidel, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macklem, Timothy, ‘Ideas of Easy Virtue’ in Keown, John and George, Robert P. (eds.), Reason, Morality and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H., ‘A Theory of Human Motivation’ (1943) 50 Psychological Review 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerny, Ralph, ‘The Principles of Natural Law’ (1980) 25 American Journal of Jurisprudence 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerny, Ralph, ‘The Primacy of the Common Good’ in Art and Prudence: Studies in the Thought of Jacques Maritain (University of Notre Dame Press, 1988).Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff, ‘Intention, Permissibility, Terrorism and War’ (2009) 23 Philosophical Perspectives 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth, Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism (MIT Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Robert, and Kornhauser, Lewis, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ (1979) 88 Yale Law Journal 950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Philip, ‘When Rights Are Permissibly Infringed’ (1988) 53 Philosophical Studies 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S., ‘Law as a Functional Kind’ in George, Robert P. (ed.), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays (Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S., ‘Law as Justice’ (2001) 18(1) Social Philosophy and Policy 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C., Natural Law and Practical Rationality (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C., ‘Natural Law Theory’ in Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Blackwell, 2005).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C., Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C., ‘Defect and Deviance in Natural Law Jurisprudence’ in Klatt, Matthias (ed.), Institutional Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C., ‘The Explanatory Role of the Weak Natural Law Thesis’ in Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dana Kay, and Rickless, Samuel C., ‘Three Cheers for Double Effect’ (2014) 89 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, Dana Kay, and Rickless, Samuel C., ‘So Close, Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short’ (2015) 49 Nous 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Thomas, Robert Paul, ‘The First Economic Revolution’ (1977) 30 Economic History Review, Second Series 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Felix E., Dimensions of Freedom: An Analysis (St Martin’s Press, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otteson, James R., Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, , Apology.Google Scholar
Plato, , The Laws.Google Scholar
Porter, Jean, ‘Basic Goods and the Human Good in Recent Catholic Moral Theology’ (1993) 57 The Thomist 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Jean, ‘Tradition in the Recent Work of Alasdair MacIntyre’ in Murphy, Mark C. (ed.), Alasdair MacIntyre (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A., ‘Statutory Interpretation in the Classroom and in the Courtroom’ (1983) 50 University of Chicago Law Review 800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’ (1975) 7 Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 131.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren S., ‘Actions, Intentions and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect’ (1989) 18 Philosophy and Public Affairs 334.Google ScholarPubMed
Radbruch, Gustav, ‘Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy’ (trans. Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski and Paulson, Stanley L.) (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav, ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Super-Statutory Law’ (trans. Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski and Paulson, Stanley L.) (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, ‘Outline for a Decision Procedure in Ethics’ (1951) 60 Philosophical Review 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, ‘The Independence of Moral Theory’ (1974) 48 Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Problem about the Nature of Law’ (1983) 21 University of Western Ontario Law Review 203.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Hart on Moral Rights and Legal Duties’ (1984) 4 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Can There Be a Theory of Law?’ in Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Blackwell, 2005).Google Scholar
Réaume, Denise, ‘Is Integrity a Virtue? Dworkin’s Theory of Legal Obligation’ (1989) 39 University of Toronto Law Journal 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinach, Adolf, ‘The A Priori Foundations of the Civil Law’ (trans. Crosby, John F.) (1983) 3 Aletheia 1.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert, ‘The Evolution of Subjective Commitment to Groups: A Tribal Instincts Hypothesis’ in Nesse, R. M. (ed.), Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment (Russell Sage, 2001).Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca L., and Smyth, Aaron C, Access across America: First Report of the Civil Justice Infrastructure Mapping Project (American Bar Foundation, 2011).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de, Course in General Linguistics (Open Court, trans. Harris, Roy, 1986).Google Scholar
Searle, John, ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’ (1980) 3 Behavioral and Brain Sciences 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J., ‘On Hart’s Way Out’ in Coleman, Jules (ed.), Hart’s Postscript (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Shiner, Roger A., ‘Law and Its Normativity’ in Patterson, Dennis (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Blackwell, 2nd edn, 2010).Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John, Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Sloman, S., and Malt, B., ‘Artifacts Are Not Ascribed Essences, nor Are They Treated as Belonging to Kinds’ (2003) 18 Language and Cognitive Processes 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1776).Google Scholar
Smith, M. B. E., ‘Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?’ (1973) 82 Yale Law Journal 950.Google Scholar
Soper, Philip, ‘In Defense of Classical Natural Law in Legal Theory: Why Unjust Law Is No Law at All’ (2007) 20 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoljar, Natalie, ‘Counterfactuals in Interpretation: The Case against Intentionalism’ (1998) 20 Adelaide Law Review 29.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty’ in Ryan, Alan (ed.), The Idea of Freedom (Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘Language and Human Nature’ in Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘Leading a Life’ in Chang, Ruth (ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason (Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Taylor, Donald M., and Doria, Janet R., ‘Self-Serving and Group-Serving Bias in Attribution’ (1981) 113 Journal of Social Psychology 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L., ‘Realism and Human Kinds’ (2003) 67 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L., ‘Metaphysical Arguments against Ordinary Objects’ (2006) 56 Philosophical Quarterly 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L., ‘Artifacts and Human Concepts’ in Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, Rights, Restitution and Risk (Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher, ‘Basic Goods, Practical Insight and External Reasons’ in Oderberg, David S. and Chappell, Sophie Grace (eds.), Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law (Palgrave, 2005).Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher, Lying and Christian Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ (1974) 185 Science 1124.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., ‘Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and the Effective Rule of Law’ (2003) 30 Crime and Justice 283.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., ‘Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation’ (2006) 57 Annual Review of Psychology 375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veatch, Henry, ‘Natural Law and the “Is”-“Ought” Question’ (1981) 81 Catholic Lawyer 251.Google Scholar
Veatch, Henry, and Rautenberg, Joseph, ‘Does the Grisez-Finnis-Boyle Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?’ (1991) 44 Review of Metaphysics 807.Google Scholar
von Mises, Ludwig, The Theory of Money and Credit (Jonathan Cape, trans. Batson, H. E., 1953).Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall, ‘How Marvelous! Toward a Theory of Aesthetic Value’ (1993) 51 Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, David, Sameness and Substance Renewed (Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Glanville, ‘The Concept of Legal Liberty’ (1956) 56 Columbia Law Review 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar