Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:35:31.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Fundamental Role of Aggression and Conflict in the Evolution and Organization of Social Groups

from Part III - Species Comparisons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Walter Wilczynski
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Sarah F. Brosnan
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access

Summary

Research on the evolution of social groups has focused substantially on processes that increase cooperative behaviors (Bourke, 2011). Indeed, each major evolutionary transition (the evolution of eukaryotes from prokaryotes, the evolution of multicellular organisms from single-celled organisms, the evolution of eusocial insect societies from solitary species, etc.) involves increasing cooperative behavior to the point where previously independent units now must interact to successfully replicate (Szathmary and Smith, 1995). With the focus on cooperation, the importance of aggression and conflict in societies is typically overlooked, despite the fundamental nature of these processes in giving rise to and maintaining social structures (see Chapters 2, 8, and 9 for other examples). For instance, maternal antipredator aggression is the critical antecedent to a stable social unit that exists in a central place (e.g., a nest or burrow) (Brunton, 1990; Groom, 1992). Within social groups, aggression among individuals establishes dominance hierarchies, manages conflict, and leads to division of labor in contexts of reproduction and offspring care (Ratnieks et al., 2006; Wittemyer and Getz, 2007). Here we discuss the possible roles of aggression and conflict in the evolution and organization of social groups, and explore the underlying molecular and physiological mechanisms associated with these drivers of sociality. We define aggression as behaviors that carry a potential physical cost or otherwise could reduce the direct fitness of the individuals involved, and we define conflict as situations in which the fitness interests of interacting individuals diverge, regardless of the behavioral outcome.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cooperation and Conflict
The Interaction of Opposites in Shaping Social Behavior
, pp. 212 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaux, C., Sinha, S., Hasadsri, L. et al. (2009) Honey bee aggression supports a link between gene regulation and behavioral evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 106(36): 1540015405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amdam, G. V., Csondes, A., Fondrk, M. K., and Page, R. E., Jr. (2006) Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits. Nature, 439(7072): 7678.Google Scholar
Amsalem, E., Grozinger, C. M., Padilla, M., and Hefetz, A. (2015) The physiological and genomic bases of bumble bee social behaviour. Advances in Insect Physiology: Genomics, Physiology and Behavior of Social Insects, 48 : 3794.Google Scholar
Amsalem, E., and Hefetz, A. (2010) The appeasement effect of sterility signaling in dominance contests among Bombus terrestris workers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(10): 16851694.Google Scholar
Amsalem, E., and Hefetz, A. (2011) The effect of group size on the interplay between dominance and reproduction in Bombus terrestris. PLoS ONE, 6(3): e18238.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. (1984) The evolution of eusociality. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15(1): 165189.Google Scholar
Asahina, K. (2017) Neuromodulation and strategic action choice in Drosophila aggression. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40: 5175.Google Scholar
Barron, A. B., and Robinson, G. E. (2008) The utility of behavioral models and modules in molecular analyses of social behavior. Genes Brain and Behavior, 7(3): 257265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bee, M. A. (2003) Experience-based plasticity of acoustically evoked aggression in a territorial frog. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 189(6): 485496.Google Scholar
Bloch, G., and Grozinger, C. M. (2011) Social molecular pathways and the evolution of bee societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Science, 366(1574): 21552170.Google Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (2011) Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breed, M. D. (1983) Nestmate recognition in honey bees. Animal Behaviour, 31: 8691.Google Scholar
Breed, M. D., Guzman-Novoa, E., and Hunt, G. J. (2004) Defensive behavior of honey bees: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annual Review of Entomology, 49: 271298.Google Scholar
Breed, M. D., Robinson, G. E., and Page, R. E. (1990) Division of labor during honey bee colony defense. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27: 395401.Google Scholar
Brunton, D. H. (1990) The effects of nesting stage, sex, and type of predator on parental defense by Killdeer (Charadrius-Vociferus) – Testing models of avian parental defense. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26(3): 181190.Google Scholar
Bruschini, C., Cervo, R., and Turillazzi, S. (2006) Evidence of alarm pheromones in the venom of Polistes dominulus workers (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Physiological Entomology, 31(3): 286293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, M. A. (2011) The role of threats in animal cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Science, 278: 170178.Google Scholar
Cardinal, S., Straka, J., and Danforth, B. N. (2010) Comprehensive phylogeny of apid bees reveals evolutionary origins and antiquity of cleptoparasitism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(37): 1620716211.Google Scholar
Carey, J. R. (2001) Demographic mechanisms for the evolution of long life in social insects. Experimental Gerontology, 36: 713722.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, S., Rittschof, C. C., Djukovic, D., Gu, H., Raftery, D., Price, N. D., and Robinson, G. E. (2015) Aggression is associated with aerobic glycolysis in the honey bee brain. Genes Brain and Behavior, 14(2): 158166.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. F. (2012) The Insects: Structure and Function. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couvillon, M. J., Robinson, E. J. H., Atkinson, B., Child, L., Dent, K. R., and Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2008) En garde: Rapid shifts in honeybee, Apis mellifera, guarding behaviour are triggered by onslaught of conspecific intruders. Animal Behaviour, 76(5): 16531658.Google Scholar
Crespi, B. J. (1994) Three conditions for the evolution of eusociality: Are they sufficient? Insectes Sociaux, 41: 395400.Google Scholar
De Fine Licht, H. H., Boomsma, J. J., and Tunlid, A. (2014) Symbiotic adaptations in the fungal cultivar of leaf-cutting ants. Nature Communications, 5: 5675.Google Scholar
Doke, M. A., Frazier, M., and Grozinger, C. M. (2015) Overwintering honey bees: Biology and management. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 10: 185193.Google Scholar
Fahrbach, S. E., Farris, S. M., Sullivan, J. P., and Robinson, G. E. (2003) Limits on volume changes in the mushroom bodies of the honey bee brain. Journal of Neurobiology, 57(2): 141151.Google Scholar
Farris, S. M., Robinson, G. E., and Fahrbach, S. E. (2001) Experience- and age-related outgrowth of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of the adult worker honeybee. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(16): 63956404.Google Scholar
Fawcett, T. W., and Johnstone, R. A. (2010) Learning your own strength: Winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Science, 277(1686): 14271434.Google Scholar
Fjerdingstad, E. J., and Crozier, R. H. (2006) The evolution of worker caste diversity in social insects. The American Naturalist, 167(3): 390400.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D. A., Wang, Y., Amdam, G. V., Page, R. E., and Grozinger, C. M. (2015) Reproductive physiology mediates honey bee (Apis mellifera) worker responses to social cues. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69(9): 15111518.Google Scholar
Giray, T., Giovanetti, M., and West-Eberhard, M. J. (2005) Juvenile hormone, reproduction, and worker behavior in the neotropical social wasp Polistes canadensis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 102(9): 33303335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giray, T., Guzman-Novoa, E., Aron, C. W., Zelinsky, B., Fahrbach, S. E., and Robinson, G. E. (2000) Genetic variation in worker temporal polyethism and colony defensiveness in the honey bee Apis mellifera. Behavioral Ecology, 11(1): 4455.Google Scholar
Groom, M. J. (1992) Sand-colored Nighthawks parasitize the antipredator behavior of three nesting bird species. Ecology, 73(3): 785793.Google Scholar
Gruter, C., Menezes, C., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L., and Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2012) A morphologically specialized soldier caste improves colony defense in a neotropical eusocial bee. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109(4): 11821186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartfelder, K. (2000) Insect juvenile hormone: From “status quo” to high society. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 33: 157177.Google Scholar
Hirschenhauser, K., and Oliveira, R. F. (2006) Social modulation of androgens in male vertebrates: Meta-analyses of the challenge hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 71(2): 265277.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. (1981) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9: 301314.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1994) War and Foreign Policy. Journey to the Ants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, p. 70.Google Scholar
Huang, Z., and Robinson, G. E. (1992) Honeybee colony integration: Worker–worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 89: 1172611729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Z. Y., Robinson, G. E., and Borst, D. W. (1994) Physiological correlates of division of labor among similarly aged honey bees. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 174(6): 731739.Google Scholar
Hunt, G. J., Guzmán-Novoa, E., Uribe-Rubio, J. L., and Prieto-Merlos, D. (2003) Genotype–environment interactions in honeybee guarding behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 66(3): 459467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. H., Kensinger, B. J., Kossuth, J. A., Henshaw, M. T., Norberg, K., Wolschin, F., and Amdam, G. V. (2007) A diapause pathway underlies the gyne phenotype in Polistes wasps, revealing an evolutionary route to caste-containing insect societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 104(35): 1402014025.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Y., and Miura, T. (2012) Hidden aggression in termite workers: Plastic defensive behaviour dependent upon social context. Animal Behaviour, 83(3): 737745.Google Scholar
Jandt, J. M., Suryanarayanan, S., Hermanson, J. C., Jeanne, R. L., and Toth, A. L. (2017) Maternal and nourishment factors interact to influence offspring developmental trajectories in social wasps. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B Biological Science, 284(1857): 19.Google ScholarPubMed
Jandt, J. M., and Toth, A. L. (2015) Physiological and genomic mechanisms of social organization in wasps (Family: Vespidae). Advances in Insect Physiology: Genomics, Physiology and Behavior of Social Insects, 48: 95130.Google Scholar
Kapheim, K. M. (2017) Nutritional, endocrine, and social influences on reproductive physiology at the origins of social behavior. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 22: 6270.Google Scholar
Kastberger, G., Thenius, R., Stabentheiner, A., and Hepburn, R. (2008) Aggressive and docile colony defence patterns in Apis mellifera: A retreater–releaser concept. Journal of Insect Behavior, 22(1): 6585.Google Scholar
Keller, L., and Chapuiset, M. (1999) Cooperation among selfish individuals in insect societies. BioScience, 49(11): 899909.Google Scholar
Keller, L., and Nonacs, P. (1993) The role of queen pheromones in social insects: Queen control or queen signal? Animal Behavior, 45(4): 787794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khila, A., and Abouheif, E. (2008) Reproductive constraint is a developmental mechanism that maintains social harmony in advanced ant societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 105(46): 1788417889.Google Scholar
Kocher, S. D., Ayroles, J. F., Stone, E. A., and Grozinger, C. M. (2010) Individual variation in pheromone response correlates with reproductive traits and brain gene expression in worker honey bees. PLoS ONE, 5(2): e9116.Google Scholar
Kocher, S. D., and Grozinger, C. M. (2011) Cooperation, conflict, and the evolution of queen pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 37(11): 12631275.Google Scholar
Lawson, S. P., Helmreich, S. L., and Rehan, S. M. (2017) Effects of nutritional deprivation on development and behavior in the subsocial bee Ceratina calcarata (Hymenoptera: Xylocopinae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 220(Pt 23): 44564462.Google Scholar
Li-Byarlay, H., Rittschof, C. C., Massey, J. H., Pittendrigh, B. R., and Robinson, G. E. (2014) Socially responsive effects of brain oxidative metabolism on aggression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 111(34): 1253312537.Google Scholar
Machado, G. (2002) Maternal care, defensive behavior, and sociality in neotropical Goniosoma harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones). Insectes Sociaux, 49: 388393.Google Scholar
Maleszka, R. (2018) Beyond Royalactin and a master inducer explanation of phenotypic plasticity in honey bees. Communications Biology, 1: 8.Google Scholar
Mao, W., Schuler, M. A., and Berenbaum, M. R. (2015) A dietary phytochemical alters caste-associated gene expression in honey bees. Science Advances, 1(7): e1500795.Google Scholar
Mathiron, A. G. E., Earley, R. L., and Goubault, M. (2019) Juvenile hormone manipulation affects female reproductive status and aggressiveness in a non-social parasitoid wasp. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 274: 8086.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, P., and Topoff, H. H. (1985) Social regulation of behavioral development in the ant, Novomessor albisetosus (Mayr). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 99(1): 314.Google Scholar
Moczek, A. P. (2010) Phenotypic plasticity and diversity in insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Science, 365(1540): 593603.Google Scholar
Moritz, R. F., Lattorff, H. M., and Crewe, R. M. (2004) Honeybee workers (Apis mellifera capensis) compete for producing queen-like pheromone signals. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B Biological Science, 271 (Suppl 3): S98S100.Google Scholar
Muscedere, M. L., Traniello, J. F. A., and Gronenberg, W. (2011) Coming of age in an ant colony: Cephalic muscle maturation accompanies behavioral development in Pheidole dentata. Naturwissenschaften, 98(9): 783793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeger, N. L., Peso, M., Even, N., Barron, A. B., and Robinson, G. E. (2013) Altruistic behavior by egg-laying worker honeybees. Current Biology, 23(16): 15741578.Google Scholar
Nakahira, T., and Kudo, S.-I. (2008) Maternal care in the burrower bug Adomerus triguttulus: Defensive behavior. Journal of Insect Behavior, 21(4): 306316.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., and Wilson, E. O. (2010) The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466(7310): 10571062.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, D. J., and Hay, M. E. (1980) Mutualism between harvester ants and a desert ephemeral: Seed escape from rodents. Ecology, 61(3): 531540.Google Scholar
Page, R. E., and Erickson, E. H. (1988) Reproduction by worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23: 117126.Google Scholar
Passera, L., Roncin, E., Kaufman, B. A., and Keller, L. (1996) Increased soldier production in ant colonies exposed to intraspecific competition. Nature, 379: 630631.Google Scholar
Plowright, R. C., and Jay, S. C. (1966) Rearing bumble bee colonies in captivity. Journal of Apicultural Research, 5(3): 155165.Google Scholar
Rajakumar, R., San Mauro, D., Dijkstra, M. B. et al. (2012) Ancestral developmental potential facilitates parallel evolution in ants. Science, 335: 7982.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F. L., Foster, K. R., and Wenseleers, T. (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 581608.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F. L., and Wenseleers, T. (2008) Altruism in insect societies and beyond: Voluntary or enforced? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(1): 4552.Google Scholar
Rehan, S. M., and Toth, A. L. (2015) Climbing the social ladder: The molecular evolution of sociality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30(7): 426433.Google Scholar
Rittschof, C. C., Bukhari, S. A., Sloofman, L. G. et al. (2014) Neuromolecular responses to social challenge: Common mechanisms across mouse, stickleback fish, and honey bee. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 111(50): 1792917934.Google Scholar
Rittschof, C. C., Coombs, C. B., Frazier, M., Grozinger, C. M., and Robinson, G. E. (2015) Early-life experience affects honey bee aggression and resilience to immune challenge. Science Reports, 5: 15572.Google Scholar
Rittschof, C. C., and Robinson, G. E. (2016) Behavioral genetic toolkits: Toward the evolutionary origins of complex phenotypes. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 119: 157204.Google Scholar
Rittschof, C. C., Vekaria, H. J., Palmer, J. H., and Sullivan, P. G. (2018) Brain mitochondrial bioenergetics change with rapid and prolonged shifts in aggression in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(Pt 8): jeb176917, DOI: 10.1242/jeb.176917.Google Scholar
Rittschof, C. C., Vekaria, H. J., Palmer, J. H., and Sullivan, P. G. (2019) Biogenic amines and activity levels alter the neural energetic response to aggressive social cues in the honey bee Apis mellifera. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 97: 9911003.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. E. (1987) Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: Evidence for division of labor based on hormonally regulated response thresholds. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 160: 613619.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. E. (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology, 37: 637665.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Fernald, R. D., and Clayton, D. F. (2008) Genes and social behavior. Science, 322(5903): 896900.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Winston, M. L., Huang, Z., and Pankiw, T. (1998) Queen mandibular gland pheromone influences worker honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging ontogeny and juvenile hormone titers. Journal of Insect Physiology, 44(7–8): 685692.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D. R., and Hofmann, H. A. (2015) Editorial overview: The integrative study of animal behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 6: vviii.Google Scholar
Sakagami, S. F. (1958) The false queen: Fourth adjustive response in dequeened honeybee colonies. Behaviour, 13: 280296.Google Scholar
Scott, M. P. (1998) The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Annual Review of Entomology, 43: 595618.Google Scholar
Seeley, T. D. (2012) Progress in understanding how the waggle dance improves the foraging efficiency of honey bee colonies. In Galizia, C., Eisenhardt, D., Giurfa, M., eds., Honeybee Neurobiology and Behavior. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 7787.Google Scholar
Seid, M. A., and Traniello, J. F. A. (2006) Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): A new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60(5): 631644.Google Scholar
Shorter, J. R., and Tibbetts, E. A. (2008) The effect of juvenile hormone on temporal polyethism in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus. Insectes Sociaux, 56(1): 713.Google Scholar
Sibbald, E. D., and Plowright, C. M. S. (2012) On the relationship between aggression and reproduction in pairs of orphaned worker bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). Insectes Sociaux, 60(1): 2330.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Toth, A., Suarez, A. et al. (2008) Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9: 735748, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2429.Google Scholar
Skukla, S., Pareek, V., and Gadagkar, R. (2014) Ovarian development in a primitively eusocial wasp: Social interactions affect behaviorally dominant and subordinate wasps in opposite directions relative to solitary females Behavioral Processes, 106: 22026.Google Scholar
Strassmann, J. E. (1981) Parasitoids, predators, and group size in the paper wasp Polistes exclamans. Ecology, 62(5): 12251233.Google Scholar
Strassmann, J. E., Queller, D. C., and Hughes, C. R. (1988) Predation and the evolution of sociality in the paper wasp Polistes bellicosus. Ecology, 69(5): 14971505.Google Scholar
Suryanarayanan, S., Hermanson, J. C., and Jeanne, R. L. (2011) A mechanical signal biases caste development in a social wasp. Current Biology, 21(3): 231235.Google Scholar
Szathmary, E., and Smith, J. M. (1995) The major evolutionary transitions. Nature, 374(6519): 227232.Google Scholar
Tallamy, D. W., and Brown, W. P. (1999) Semelparity and the evolution of maternal care in insects. Animal Behaviour, 57: 727730.Google Scholar
Thorne, B. L., Breisch, N. L., and Muscedere, M. L. (2003) Evolution of eusociality and the soldier caste in termites: Influence of intraspecific competition and accelerated inheritance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100(22): 1280812813.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E. A., and Crocker, K. C. (2014) The challenge hypothesis across taxa: Social modulation of hormone titres in vertebrates and insects. Animal Behaviour, 92: 281290.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E. A., and Lindsay, R. (2008) Visual signals of status and rival assessment in Polistes dominulus paper wasps. Biology Letters, 4(3): 237239.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E. A., and Sheehan, M. J. (2012) The effect of juvenile hormone on Polistes wasp fertility varies with cooperative behavior. Hormones and Behavior, 61(4): 559564.Google Scholar
Toth, A. L., and Robinson, G. E. (2005) Worker nutrition and division of labour in honeybees. Animal Behaviour, 69(2): 427435.Google Scholar
Toth, A. L., Tooker, J. F., Radhakrishnan, S., Minard, R., Henshaw, M. T., and Grozinger, C. M. (2014) Shared genes related to aggression, rather than chemical communication, are associated with reproductive dominance in paper wasps (Polistes metricus) BMC Genomics, 15: 75.Google Scholar
Toth, A. L., Varala, K., Newman, T. C. et al. (2007) Wasp gene expression supports an evolutionary link between maternal behavior and eusociality. Science, 318(5849): 441444.Google Scholar
Vásquez, G. M., and Silverman, J. (2008) Intraspecific aggression and colony fusion in the Argentine ant. Animal Behaviour, 75(2): 583593.Google Scholar
Weiner, S. A., Woods, W. A., Jr., and Starks, P. T. (2009) The energetic costs of stereotyped behavior in the paper wasp, Polistes dominulus. Naturwissenschaften, 96(2): 297302.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1967) Foundress associations in Polistine wasps: Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of social behavior. Science, 157(3796): 15841585.Google Scholar
Wheeler, D. E., and Nijhout, H. F. (1981) Soldier determination in ants: New role for juvenile hormone. Science, 213(4505): 361363.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (2000) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., and Ball, G. F. (1990) The “Challenge Hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136(6): 829846.Google Scholar
Winston, M. L. (1991) The Biology of the Honey Bee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittemyer, G., and Getz, W. M. (2007) Hierarchical dominance structure and social organization in African elephants, Loxodonta africana. Animal Behaviour, 73: 671681.Google Scholar
Wong, J. W. Y., Meunier, J., and Kölliker, M. (2013) The evolution of parental care in insects: The roles of ecology, life history and the social environment. Ecological Entomology, 38(2): 123137.Google Scholar
Wray, M. K., Mattila, H. R., and Seeley, S. D. (2011) Collective personalities in honeybee colonies are linked to colony fitness. Animal Behavior, 81(3): 559568.Google Scholar
Wright, C. M., Skinker, V. E., Izzo, A. S., Tibbetts, E. A., and Pruitt, J. N. (2017) Queen personality type predicts nest-guarding behaviour, colony size and the subsequent collective aggressiveness of the colony. Animal Behavior, 124: 713.Google Scholar
Yang, A. S., Martin, C. H., and Nijhout, H. F. (2004) Geographic variation of caste structure among ant populations. Current Biology, 14(6): 514519.Google Scholar
Zayed, A., and Robinson, G. E. (2012) Understanding the relationship between brain gene expression and social behavior: Lessons from the honey bee. Annual Review of Genetics, 46: 591615.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×