Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T14:26:03.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Didi Kuo
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Clientelism, Capitalism, and Democracy
The Rise of Programmatic Politics in the United States and Britain
, pp. 141 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Aldrich, Howard E. 1979. A Study of Public Works Investment in the United States, 1789–1970. Washington, DC: CONSAD Research Corporation.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origins and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Glaeser, Edward, and Sacerdote, Bruce. 2001. “Why Doesn’t the US Have a European-Style Welfare State?” Brookings Paper on Economics Activity (Fall): 187–278.Google Scholar
Allen, Howard W., and Allen, Kay Warren. 1981. “Vote Fraud and Data Validity.” In Analyzing Electoral History: A Guide to the Study of American Voting Behavior, edited by Clubb, Jerome M., Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H. 153–94. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Altschuler, Glenn, and Blumin, Stuart. 2000. Rude Republic: Americans and Their Politics in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Margaret. 2000. Practicing Democracy: Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argersinger, Peter. 1985. “New Perspectives on Election Fraud in the Gilded Age.” Political Science Quarterly 100 (4): 669–87.Google Scholar
Arriola, Leonard. 2012. Multiethnic Coalitions in Africa: Business Financing of Opposition Election Campaigns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred. 2006. “Manufacturing.” In Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to Present: Millenial Edition, edited by Carter, Susan B., Gartner, Scott Sigmund, Haines, Michael R., Olmstead, Alan L., Sutch, Richard, and Wright, Gavin. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aydelotte, William. 1976. “Constituency Influence in the British House of Commons, 1841–1847.” In The History of Parliamentary Behavior 225–46. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Alan. 1987. British Political Parties: The Emergence of a Modern Party System. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian. 2003. “Mirrors of Desires: Interest Groups, Election, and the Targeted Style in Twentieth-Century America.” In The Democratic Experiment, edited by Jacobs, Meg, Novak, William, and Zelizer, Julian, 222–49. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian. 2009. A Government Out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-Century America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward C., and Wilson, James Q.. 1963. City Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartrip, P. W. J. 1983. “State Intervention in Mid-Nineteenth Century Britain: Fact or Fiction?Journal of British Studies 23 (1): 6383.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel. 1957. “The Representation of Interests in British Government: Historical Background.” The American Political Science Review 51 (3): 613–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Samuel. 1982. Modern British Politics: Parties and Pressure Groups in the Collectivist Age. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. 1990. Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Lee. 1955. Merchants, Farmers, and Railroads: Railroad Regulation and New York Politics, 1850–1887. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald. 1991. “Corporate Liberalism Reconsidered: A Review Essay.” Journal of Policy History 3 (1): 70.Google Scholar
Berrington, Hugh. 1968. “Partisanship and Dissidence in the Nineteenth-Century House of Commons.” Parliamentary Affairs 21: 338–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackford, Mansel G. 2008. The Rise of Modern Business: Great Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan, and China. 3rd ed. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Blank, Stephen. 1973. Industry and Government in Britain: The Federation of British Industries in Politics, 1945–65. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Bonnett, Clarence. 1922. Employers’ Associations in the United States: A Study of Typical Associations. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Braggion, Fabio, and Moore, Lyndon. 2013. “The Economic Benefits of Political Connections in Late Victorian Britain.” The Journal of Economic History 73 (1): 142–76.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and van de Walle, Nicholas, eds. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Asa. 1959. Chartist Studies. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bruce, William George. 1920. Commercial Organizations: Their Function, Operation, and Service. Milwaukee, WI: Bruce Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Ivor. 1953. The Party System in Great Britain. London: Phoenix House.Google Scholar
Burke, Albie. 1970. “Federal Regulation of Congressional Elections in Northern Cities, 1871–1894.” The American Journal of Legal History 14 (1): 1734.Google Scholar
Burn, W. L. 1950. “Electoral Corruption in the Nineteenth Century.” Parliamentary Affairs IV (4): 437–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bustikova, Lenka, and Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina. 2017. “Patronage, Trust, and State Capacity: The Historical Trajectories of Clientelism.” World Politics 69 (2): 277326.Google Scholar
Butler, Henry N. 1986. “General Incorporation in Nineteenth Century England: Interaction of Common Law and Legislative Processes.” International Review of Law and Economics 6: 169–87.Google Scholar
Butler, Jon. 2000. Becoming America: The Revolution before 1776. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 742–57.Google Scholar
Cannadine, David. 1990. Decline and Fall of British Aristocracy. Avon, UK: Bath Press.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2010. “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8–9): 931–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputation, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2005. “The Evolution of National Bureaucracy in the United States.” In The Executive Branch, edited by Aberbach, Joel D. and Peterson, Mark A., 4171. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carrott, M. Browning. 1970. “The Supreme Court and American Trade Associations 1921–1925.” The Business History Review 44 (3): 320–38.Google Scholar
Cassis, Youssef. 2007. “Big Business.” In Oxford Handbook of Business History, edited by Jones, Geoffrey and Zeitlin, Jonathan, 171–93. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, William, and Davis, Paul. 1978. “Party, Competition and Mass Participation: The Case of the Democratizing Party System, 1824–1852.” In The History of American Electoral Behavior, edited by Sibley, Joel, Bogue, Allan, and Flanigan, William, 174–97. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. 1984. “The Emergence of Managerial Capitalism.” The Business History Review 58 (4): 473503.Google Scholar
Checkland, Sydney. 1989. “British Public Policy 1776–1939.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. 8, edited by Mathias, P. and Pollard, S., 607–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chester, Daniel. 1981. The English Administrative System 1780–1870. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chubb, Judith. 1982. Patronage, Power, and Poverty in Southern Italy: A Tale of Two Cities. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clapham, Christopher. 1982. Private Patronage and Public Power: Political Clientelism in the Modern State. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Clapham, J. H. 1926. An Economic History of Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, P. 1983. The English Alehouse: A Social History, 1200–1830. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth. 1997. The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth. 2010. “From City Club to Nation State: Business Networks in American Political Development.” Theory and Society 39 (3/4): 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Frederick. 1885. A History of Private Bill Legislation. Vol. 1. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1987. The Efficient Secret. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2009. “Swing Voters, Core Voters and Distributive Politics.” In Political Representation, edited by Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan, Wood, Elisabeth, and Kirshner, Alexander S. 342–57. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Morgan Kousser, J.. 1981. “Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 646–63.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1986. “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game.” The Journal of Politics 48 (2): 370–89.Google Scholar
Cronin, James E. 1991. The Politics of State Expansion: War, State, and Society in Twentieth-Century Britain. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn, and Skocpol, Theda. 2001. “The Rush to Organize: Explaining Associational Formation in the United States, 1860s–1920s.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 813–29.Google Scholar
Cruz, Cesi, and Keefer, Philip. 2015. “Political Parties, Clientelism, and Bureaucratic Reform.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (14): 1942–73.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper. 2015. “Structural Power and Political Science in the Post-Crisis Era.” Business and Politics 17(3): 391409.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz, and Johansson, Eva. 2002. “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 2740.Google Scholar
Davis, Cory. 2014. “The Political Economy of Commercial Associations: Building the National Board of Trade, 1840–1868.” Business History Review 88 (Winter): 761–83.Google Scholar
De La O, Ana. 2015. Crafting Policies to End Poverty in Latin America: The Quiet Transformation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dempsey, John. 1956. “Control by Congress over the Seating and Disciplining of Members.” PhD thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Estévez, Federico, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2016. The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
diSalvo, Daniel. 2012. Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 1868–2010. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” The Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1132–55.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., and Lemarchand, Rene, eds. 1981. Political Clientelism, Patronage, and Development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
Emanuel, Lewis. 1881. Corrupt Practices at Parliamentary Elections: An Address Delivered to the Lewisham and Lee Liberal Club. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Erie, Stephen. 1988. Rainbow’s End: Irish-Americans and the Dilemma of Urban Machine Politics, 1840–1985. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 2002. Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Formisano, Ronald P. 1999. “The ‘Party Period’ Revisited.” The Journal of American History 86 (1): 93120.Google Scholar
Foth, Joseph Henry. 1930. Trade Associations: Their Services to Industry. New York, NY: Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1994. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico.” World Politics 46: 151–84.Google Scholar
Friedman, Leon. 1973. “The Democratic Party 1860–1884.” In History of U.S. Political Parties, edited by Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., 2: 885908. New York, NY: Chelsea House Publishers.Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy, Reuter, Ora John, and Szakonyi, David. 2014. “Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66 (2): 195228.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. Political Order: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis. 1970. “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History.” The Business History Review 44 (3): 279–90.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis. 1983. “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization: Central Themes of the Organizational Synthesis.” Business History Review 57 (4): 471–93.Google Scholar
Gans-Morse, Jordan, Mazzuca, Sebastian, and Nichter, Simeon. 2014. “Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics during Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 415–32.Google Scholar
Gash, Norman. 1977. Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830–50. 2nd ed. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1996. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest, and Waterbury, John. 1977. Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Gienapp, William E. 1982. “Politics Seem to Enter into Everything: Political Culture in the North, 1840–1860.” In Essays on American Antebellum Politics, 1840–1860, edited by Maizlish, Stephen E. and Kushma, John J. 1469. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Press.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., and Shleifer, Andrei. 2003. “The Rise of the Regulatory State.” Journal of Economic Literature 41: 401–25.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam. 2003. “Electoral Connections: The Effects of the Personal Vote on Political Patronage, Bureaucracy, and Legislation in Postwar Italy.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 189212.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Min, Brian. 2013. “Distributive Politics around the World.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 7399.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Libecap, Gary. 1994. The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Carter. 1960. Government Promotion of American Canals and Railroads, 1800–1890. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin. 1994. New Deals: Business, Labor, and Politics in America, 1920–1935. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Matthew. 2007. “Race, Party, and Contested Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives.” Polity 39 (2): 155–78.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2008. “Beyond Clientelism: Incumbent State Capture and State Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5): 638–73.Google Scholar
Gutchen, Robert. 1961. “Local Improvements and Centralization in Nineteenth-Century England.” The Historical Journal 4 (1): 8596.Google Scholar
Guttsman, W. L. 1965. The British Political Elite. London: MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar
Gwyn, William B. 1962. Democracy and the Cost of Politics in Britain. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Haber, Samuel. 1964. Efficiency and Uplift: Scientific Management in the Progressive Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 2007. “Parties and Voters in Emerging Democracies.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan, 582603. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. Reorganizing Representation in Latin America: Parties, Program, and Patronage in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Forthcoming, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances, Gervasoni, Carlos, and Moraes, Juan Andres. 2009. “From Patronage to Program: The Emergence of Party-Oriented Legislators in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (3): 360391.Google Scholar
Hanham, H. J. 1960a. “Political Patronage at the Treasury, 1870–1912.” The Historical Journal 3 (1): 7584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanham, H. J. 1960b. “The Sale of Honours in Late Victorian England.” Victorian Studies 3 (3): 277–89.Google Scholar
Hanham, H. J. 1978. Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone. 2nd ed. Hamden, CT: Archon Book.Google Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, B. H. 1971. Drink and the Victorians: The Temperance Question in England, 1815–1872. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Hart, David. 2004. “‘Business’ Is Not an Interest Group: On the Study of Companies in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 4769.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis. 1978. “The Discovery and Study of a Corporate Liberalism.” Business History Review 52 (3): 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Roy. 1977. “Employers and Social Policy in Britain: The Evolution of Welfare Legislation, 1905–14.” Social History 2 (4): 435–55.Google Scholar
Hays, Samuel P. 1957. The Response to Industrialism, 1885–1914. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heesom, Alan. 1988. “‘Legitimtate’ versus ‘Illegitimate’ Influences: Aristocratic Electioneering in Mid-Victorian Britain.” Parliamentary History 7 (2): 282305.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert. 1972. In the Name of Profit. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics 50 (January): 203–34.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2011. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 289310.Google Scholar
Higgens-Evenson, R. Rudy. 2003. The Price of Progress: Public Services, Taxation and the American Corporate State, 1877–1929. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Hamilton Andrew. 1885. Commercial Conventions and the National Board of Trade. Boston, MA: Tolman & White Printers.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hoppen, K. Theodore. 1998. The Mid-Victorian Generation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoppit, Julian. 1996. “Patterns of Parliamentary Legislation, 1660–1800.” The Historical Journal 39 (1): 109–31.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Edward. 1949. “Sir Charles Trevelyan and Civil Service Reform.” English Historical Review 64 (250): 5388.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ilersic, A. R., and Liddle, P. F. B.. 1960. Parliament of Commerce: The Story of the Association of British Chambers of Commerce, 1860–1960. London: Millbrook Press.Google Scholar
Ingle, Stephen. 2008. The British Party System. 4th ed. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2009. “Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow from the Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 61 (3): 438–86.Google Scholar
James, Scott. 2006. “Patronage Regimes and American Party Development from the Age of Jackson to the Progressive Era.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 3960.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffrey. 2004. “Partisanship and Contested Election Cases in the House of Representatives, 1789–2002.” Studies in American Political Development 18: 112–35.Google Scholar
Jerrold, Blanchard. 1883. “On the Manufacture of Public Opinion.” Nineteenth Century 13: 1080–92.Google Scholar
John, Richard. 1995. Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kimberly S. 2009. “The First New Federalism and the Development of the Modern American State.” In The Unsustainable American State, edited by Jacobs, Lawrence and King, Desmond, 88115. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ronald, and Libecap, Gary. 1994. “Patronage to Merit and Control of the Federal Government Labor Force.” Explorations in Economic History 31: 91119.Google Scholar
Kam, Christopher. 2011. “Partisanship, Enfranchisement, and the Political Economy of Electioneering in the United Kingdom, 1826–1906.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Lapinski, John. 2006. “The Substance of Representation: Studying Policy Content and Legislative Behavior.” In The Macropolitics of Congress, edited by Adler, E. Scott and Lapinski, John, 96128. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip. 2006. “Programmatic Parties: Where Do They Come from and Do They Matter?” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip. 2007. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 804–21.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Vlaicu, Razvan. 2007. “Democracy, Credibility, and Clientelism.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 24 (2): 371406.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel, and McDonald, Michael. 1999. “Congress and America’s Political Development: The Transformation of the Post Office from Patronage to Service.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 792811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. 5th ed. New York, NY: Crowell.Google Scholar
Khan, Mushtaq H. 2005. “Markets, States and Democracy: Patron–Client Networks and the Case for Democracy in Developing Countries.” Democratization 12 (5): 704–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (6): 845–79.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kselman, Daniel M.. 2013. “Economic Development, Democratic Experience, and Political Parties’ Linkage Strategies.” Comparative Political Studies 20 (10): 132.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Freeze, Kent. 2010. “Programmatic Party Structuration: Developing and Comparing Cross-National and Cross-Party Measures with a New Global Data Set.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Altamirano, Melina. 2015. “Clientelism in Latin America: Effort and Effectiveness.” In The Latin American Voter, edited by Carlin, Ryan E., Singer, Matthew M., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., 259–87. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven, eds. 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klinghard, Daniel. 2010. The Nationalization of American Political Parties, 1880–1896. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kolko, Gabriel. 1963. The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900–1916. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kornbluh, Mark Lawrence. 2000. Why America Stopped Voting: The Decline of Participatory Democracy and the Emergence of Modern American Politics. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Didi, and Teorell, Jan. 2017. “Illicit Tactics as Substitutes: Election Fraud, Ballot Reform, and Contested Congressional Elections in the United States, 1860–1930.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (5): 665–96.Google Scholar
Larson, John. 2001. Internal Improvement: National Public Works and the Promise of Popular Government in the Early United Stats. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2003. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 233–56.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Molina, Ivan. 2002. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2007. “From Populism to Clientelism? The Transformation of Labor-Based Party Linkages in Latin America.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, edited by Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven, 335–80. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar, and Weibull, Jorgen. 1987. “Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition.” Public Choice 52 (3): 273–97.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lizzeri, Alessandro, and Persico, Nicola. 2004. “Why Did Elites Extend the Suffrage? Democracy and the Scope of Government, with an Application to Britain’s ‘Age of Reform.’Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (2): 705–63.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Trevor. 1965. “Uncontested Seats in British General Elections 1852–1910.” The Historical Journal 8 (2): 260–65.Google Scholar
Loomis, Burdett A. 2011. Guide to Interest Groups and Lobbying in the United States. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, A. Lawrence. 1908. The Government of England. Vol. 1. New York, NY: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. “American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory.” World Politics 16 (4): 677715.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice.” Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298310.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. 2nd ed. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lyne, Mona. 2008. The Voter’s Dilemma and Democratic Accountability: Latin America and Beyond. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonagh, Oliver. 1958. “The Nineteenth-Century Revolution in Government: A Reappraisal.” The Historical Journal 1 (1): 5267.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Estvez, Federico. 2007. “Clientelism and Portfolio Diversification: A Model of Electoral Investment with Applications to Mexico.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, edited by Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven, 182205. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003a. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003b. “The Sources of Business Interest in Social Insurance: Sectoral vs. National Differences.” World Politics 55 (2): 229–58.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2015. From Open Secrets to Secret Ballots: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela, and Young, Lauren. 2016. “Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 267–88.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo. 2000. Stuck in Neutral: Business and the Politics of Human Capital Investment Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo. 2010. “Social Policy and Business.” In Oxford Handbook of Business and Government, edited by Wilson, Graham, Grant, Wyn, and Coen, David 565–84. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Swank, Duane. 2008. “The Political Origins of Coordinated Capitalism: Business Organizations, Party Systems, and State Structure in the Age of Innocence.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 181–98.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Swank, Duane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martis, Kenneth. 1989. The Historical Atlas of Political Parties in the United States Congress 1789–1989. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mathias, Peter. 1983. The First Industrial Nation. 2nd ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
May, Thomas Erskine. 1863. The Constitutional History of England: Since the Accession of George the Third, 1760–1860. New York, NY: A. C. Armstrong.Google Scholar
McChesney, Fred S. 1987. “Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the Economic Theory of Regulation.” The Journal of Legal Studies 16 (1): 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Grant. 1966. Private Power and American Democracy. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
McCormick, Richard L. 1981. “The Discovery That Business Corrupts Politics: A Reappraisal of the Origins of Progressivism.” American History Review 86 (2): 247–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Richard L. 1986. The Party Period and Public Policy: American Politics from the Age of Jackson to the Progressive Era. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, Richard P. 1966. The Second American Party System: Party Formation in the Jacksonian Era. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McCraw, Thomas K. 1975. “Regulation in America: A Review Article.” The Business History Review 49 (2): 159–83.Google Scholar
McIvor, Arthur. 2002. Organised Capital: Employers’ Associations and Industrial Relations in Northern England, 1880–1939. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIvor, John P. 2006. “Congressional Bills and Resolutions: 1789–2000.” In Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to Present: Millennial Edition, edited by Carter, Susan, Gartner, Scott Sigmunt, Haines, Michael R., Olmstead, Alan L., Sutch, Richard, and Wright, Gavin, table Eb268–278. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Robert. 1966. British Political Parties. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
McMenamin, Iain. 2012. “If Money Talks, What Does It Say? Varieties of Capitalism and Business Financing of Parties.” World Politics 64 (1): 138.Google Scholar
McMurtry, Virginia, et al. 1976. History of Civil Service Merit Systems of the United States and Select Foreign Countries. Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Melling, Joseph. 1992. “Welfare Capitalism and the Origins of Welfare States: British Industry, Workplace Welfare and Social Reform c. 1870–1914.” Social History 17 (3): 453–78.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Minicucci, Stephen. 2004. “Internal Improvements and the Union, 1790–1860.” Studies in American Political Development 18 (Fall): 160–85.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, Mark S. 2013. The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella, and Jackman, Robert. 2002. “Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Case Study.” British Journal of Political Science 32: 147–70.Google Scholar
Moore, D. C. 1976. The Politics of Deference. New York, NY: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1963. “The Irish.” In Behind the Melting Pot, edited by Glazer, Nathan and Moynihan, Daniel, 217–87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Munro, W. B. 1928. The Invisible Government. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Charles. 1914. The London Chamber of Commerce from 1881–1914. London: Effingham Wilson.Google Scholar
Namier, L. B. 1963. The Structure of Politics at the Ascension of George III. 2nd ed. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Nash, Gerald D. 1957. “Origins of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887.” Pennsylvania History 24 (3): 181–90.Google Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 1931.Google Scholar
Nossiter, . 1975. Influence, Opinion, and Political Idioms in Reformed England: Case Studies from the North-East, 1832–74. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Novak, William J. 1996. The People’s Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Novak, William J. 2008. “The Myth of the ‘Weak’ American State.” The American Historical Review 113 (3): 752–72.Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank. 1984. “Electoral Deference in ‘Unreformed’ England: 1760–1832.” Journal of Modern History 56: 391429.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, Moisei. 1903. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Overacker, Louise. 1932. Money in Elections. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Palmowski, Jan. 2002. “Liberalism and Local Government in Late Nineteenth Century Germany and England.” The Historical Journal 45 (2): 381409.Google Scholar
Pares, Richard. 1963. King George III and the Politicians. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parris, Henry. 1965. Government and the Railways in Ninteenth-Century Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” The Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 211–40.Google Scholar
Phillips, John A., and Wetherell, Charles. 1995. “The Great Reform Act of 1832 and the Political Modernization of England.” American Historical Review (April): 411–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattoni, Simona, ed. 2001. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen, 693721. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Pinto-Duschkinsky, Michael. 1981. British Political Finance 1830–1980. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Pollock, James K. 1932. Money and Politics Abroad. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sir Pollock, Frederick. 1883. The Land Laws. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Porritt, Edward. 1909. The Unreformed House of Commons: Parliamentary Representation before 1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economcis and Management Science 5 (2): 335–58.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan, and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pugh, Martin. 2002. The Making of Modern British Politics, 1867–1945. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward A. 1967. “Ideas and Interests: Businessmen and the Interstate Commerce Act.” The Journal of American History 54(3): 561–78.Google Scholar
Rallings, Colin, and Thrasher, Michael. 2009. British Electoral Facts, 1832–1999. 6th ed. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rauch, James, and Evans, Peter. 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review 64 (October): 748–65.Google Scholar
Reid, Joseph D., and Kurth, Michael M.. 1988. “Public Employees in Political Firms: Part A. The Patronage Era.” Public Choice 59: 253–62.Google Scholar
Reid, Joseph D., and Kurth, Michael M.. 1992. “The Rise and Fall of Urban Political Patronage Machine.” In Strategic Factors in Nineteenth Century American Economic History, edited by Goldin, Claudia and Rockoff, Hugh, 427–45. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Renda, Lex. 1997. Running on the Record: Civil War–Era Politics in New Hampshire. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, John. 1980. “The Silent Dollar: Vote Buying in New Jersey.” New Jersey History 98: 191211.Google Scholar
Richter, Donald. 1971. “The Role of Mob Riot in Victorian Elections, 1865–1885.” Victorian Studies 15 (1): 1928.Google Scholar
Ridings, Eugene. 2001. “Chambers of Commerce and Business Elites in Great Britain and Brazil in the Nineteenth Century: Some Comparisons.” The Business History Review 75 (4): 739–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, William L. 2005. Plunkitt of Tammany Hall. New York, NY: Signet Books.Google Scholar
Riper, Paul P. Van. 1958. History of the United States Civil Service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Rix, Kathryn. 2008. “The Elimination of Corrupt Practices in British Elections? Reassessing the Impact of the 1883 Corrupt Practices Act.” English Historical Review 123: 6597.Google Scholar
Robb, . 1992. White-Collar Crime in Modern England: Financial Fraud and Business Morality, 1845–1929. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, James, and Verdier, Thierry. 2013. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115 (2): 260–91.Google Scholar
Roniger, Luis. 2004. “Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy.” Comparative Politics 36 (3): 353–75.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyn, and Stephens, John. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sack, James J. 1980. “The House of Lords and Parliamentary Patronage in Great Britain, 1802–1832.” The Historical Journal 23 (4): 913–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Philip. 2009a. “The English Reform Legislation, 1831–32.” In The House of Commons, 1820–32, edited by Fisher, D., 374412. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Philip. 2009b. “The House of Commons 1801–1911.” In A Short History of Parliament, edited by Jones, Clyve, 248–69. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2002. “Pork-Barreling Is Not Credit-Claiming.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 845–63.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1999. The Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877–1917. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant System. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2006. From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Steffen, ed. 1977. Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1969. “Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 63(4): 1142–58.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1972. “Patron–Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66: 91114.Google Scholar
Seager, J. Renwick. 1909. Corrupt and Illegal Practices at Parliamentary Elections, as Defined in the Judgments in Election Petitions from 1886–1906. London: Liberal Publication Department.Google Scholar
Self, Robert. 2000. The Evolution of the British Party System 1885–1940. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Seymour, Charles. 1915. Electoral Reform in England and Wales: The Development and Operation of the Parliamentary Franchise 1832–1885. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, H. A. 1931. “The Coming of General Limited Liability.” Economic History 2: 267.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1976. “The Emergence of the Political Machine: An Alternative View.” In Theoretical Perspectives on Urban Politics, edited by Hawley, Willis D., 1444. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1977. “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and Italy.” Politics and Society 7: 403–51.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1983. “Regional Receptivity to Reform: The Legacy of the Progressive Era.” Political Science Quarterly 98 (3): 459–83.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sikes, Earl. 1928. State and Federal Corrupt-Practices Legislation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Silberman, Bernard. 1993. Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Allan, and Flanigan, William. 1978. The History of American Electoral Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, Martin J. 1988. The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916: The Market, the Law, and Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 527–46.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark. 2000. American Business and Political Power. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1993. “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 549–66.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1): 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 315–25.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2007. “Political Clientelism.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan, 604–27. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2013. “What Killed Vote Buying in Britain and the United States?” In Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics, edited by Stokes, Susan, Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcela, and Brusco, Valeria 200–44. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan, Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcela, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 1996. “Urban Political Machines: Taking Stock.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (3): 446.Google Scholar
Sturges, Kenneth. 1915. American Chambers of Commerce. New York, NY: Moffat & Co.Google Scholar
Summers, Mark W. 1987. The Plundering Generation: Corruption and the Crisis of the Union, 1849–1861. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Summers, Mark W. 2002. “‘To Make the Wheels Revolve We Must Have Grease’: Barrel Politics in the Gilded Age.” Journal of Policy History 14 (1): 4972.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 1991. “Bringing Capital Back in, or Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross-Class Alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden.” World Politics 43 (4): 513–44.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 1997. “Arranged Alliance: Business Interests in the New Deal.” Politics & Society 25: 66116.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 2002. Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sylla, Richard. 2000. “Experimental Federalism: The Economics of American Government, 1789–1914.” In The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, vol. 2: The Long Nineteenth Century, edited by Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E., 483541. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarr, Joel A. 1984. “Evolution of the Urban Infrastructure in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” In Perspectives on Urban Infrastructure, edited by Hanson, Royce, 466. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1967. Peasant Communism in Southern Italy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1977. “The Italian Party System between Crisis and Transition.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (2): 193224.Google Scholar
Teorell, Jan. 2017. “Partisanship and Unreformed Bureaucracy: The Drivers of Election Fraud in Sweden, 17191908.” Social Science History 41 (2): 201–25.Google Scholar
Thayer, George. 1973. Who Shakes the Money Tree? New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2001. “Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracies.” In Varieties of Capitalism, edited by Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David, 71103. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel J., and Harris, Richard A.. 2002. “Organized Interests and American Political Development.” Political Science Quarterly 117 (4): 587612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel J., and Harris, Richard A.. 2005. “The Development of Interest Group Politics in America: Beyond the Conceits of Modern Times.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 251–70.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1998. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2007. “What Have We Learned about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?Annual Review of Political Science 10: 211–44.Google Scholar
Troesken, Werner. 2009. “Patronage and Public-Sector Wages in 1896.” The Journal of Economic History 59 (2): 424–46.Google Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica. 2006. “Dominant Regimes and the Demise of Urban Democracy.” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 879–93.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1987. “Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom.” British Journal of Political Science 17 (4): 385408.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walle, Nicholas van de. 2007. “Meet the Old Boss, Same as the New Boss?” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, edited by Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallis, John Joseph. 2006. “Federal Government Employees, by Government Branch and Location Relative to the Capital: 1816–1992.” In Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to Present: Millennial Edition, edited by Carter, Susan, Gartner, Scott Sigmunt, Haines, Michael R., Olmstead, Alan L., Sutch, Richard, and Wright, Gavin, table Ea894–903. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin.” World Politics 55 (3): 399422.Google Scholar
Webber, Michael J., and Domhoff, G. William. 1996. “Myth and Reality in Business Support for Democrats and Republicans in the 1936 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review 90 (4): 824–33.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2012. “What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt Out of Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 568–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2014. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werking, Richard. 1978. “Bureaucrats, Businessmen, and Foreign Trade: The Origins of the United States Chamber of Commerce.” Business History Review 52 (3): 321–41.Google Scholar
White, Leonard D. 1954. The Jacksonians: A Study in Administrative History, 1829–1861. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
White, Richard. 2012. Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wickwire, Franklin B. 1965. “King’s Friends, Civil Servants, or Politicians.” The American Historical Review 71 (1): 1842.Google Scholar
Wiebe, Robert. 1967. The Search for Order. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Steven I. 2007. “Explaining Changing Patterns of Party-Voter Linkages in India.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, edited by Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven, 110–40. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, O. Cyprian. 1948. The Historical Development of Private Bill Procedure and Standing Orders in the House of Commons. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Williamson, Chilton. 1960. American Suffrage: From Property to Democracy, 1760–1860. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward. 1866. “Principles of Representation.” In Fortnightly Review, vol. 4, edited by Lewes, George Henry, 421–36. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Archibald. 1915. Commercial Organizations in the United Kingdom. Washington, DC: Government Publication Office.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E. 1972. “Why Political Machines Have Not Withered away and Other Revisionist Thoughts.” The Journal of Politics 34 (2): 365–98.Google Scholar
Yarmie, Andrew. 1980. “Employers’ Organizations in Mid-Victorian England.” International Review of Social History 25: 209–35.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2009. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: Theory and Evidence from Pre-1914 Germany.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 121.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2017. Conservative Political Parties and the Birth of Modern Democracy in Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan. 1987. “From Labour History to the History of Industrial Relations.” Economic History Review 40 (2): 159–84.Google Scholar
Zunz, Olivier. 1990. Making America Corporate 1870–1920. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Didi Kuo, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Clientelism, Capitalism, and Democracy
  • Online publication: 02 August 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Didi Kuo, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Clientelism, Capitalism, and Democracy
  • Online publication: 02 August 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Didi Kuo, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Clientelism, Capitalism, and Democracy
  • Online publication: 02 August 2018
Available formats
×