Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T16:12:12.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Tag Questions and Gender in Indian English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2020

Tobias Bernaisch
Affiliation:
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Germany
Get access

Summary

This paper is concerned with one of the features typically associated with genderlectal differentiation in language, namely tag questions. It investigates the repertoire of tag questions in Indian English, comprising both canonical and non-canonical tags such as invariant isn’t it and the indigenous forms no/na. Both a quantitative and a qualitative approach are chosen. Firstly, we apply a multifactorial analysis to the data derived from the private dialogues in the International Corpus of English for India (ICE-India) in order to determine the interplay of (sociolinguistic) context factors for the occurrence of specific tag question types. Secondly, we consider patterns of social interaction and their linguistic correlates in all-female, all-male, and mixed-group conversations, thus trying to establish locally meaningful uses of tags. We also offer some general considerations on the feasibility of integrating more recent sociolinguistic approaches towards the category of gender in corpus-linguistic research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnihotri, Rama K. 1999. ‘India: English in India’. In Singh, Rajendra, ed. The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics. New Delhi: Sage, 184–95.Google Scholar
Agresti, Alan. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edition. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1988. ‘The tag question in British English: it’s different, I’N’It’, English World-Wide 9(2): 171–91.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, Chandrika. 2009. Register Variation in Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, Gries, Stefan Th. and Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2014. ‘The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): modelling predictors and predicting prototypes’, English World-Wide 35(1): 731.Google Scholar
Bondyopadhyay, Aditya. 2011. ‘Laws Affecting LGBT Persons in South Asia: A Desk Review’ (Manuscript). South Asia LGBT Network.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1992. ‘“Not gender difference but the difference gender makes” – explanation in research on sex and language’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94: 1326.Google Scholar
Chen, Chao, Liaw, Andy and Breiman, Leo. 2004. ‘Using random forest to learn imbalanced data’ (Manuscript). Retrieved from https://statistics.berkeley.edu/tech-reports/666.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2004. ‘Sex and gender in variationist research’. In Chambers, Jack K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie, eds. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 423–43.Google Scholar
Columbus, Georgie. 2009. ‘A corpus-based analysis of invariant tags in five varieties of English’, Language and Computers 69(1): 401–14.Google Scholar
Columbus, Georgie. 2010. ‘A comparative analysis of invariant tags in three varieties of English’, English World-Wide 31(3): 288310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou and Crouch, Isabel. 1975. ‘The question of tag questions in women’s speech: they don’t really use more of them, do they?’, Language in Society 4(3): 289–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. ‘Three waves of variation study: the emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation’, Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87100.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2014. ‘The problem with binaries: coding for gender and sexuality’, Language and Linguistics Compass 8(11): 529–35.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Blass, Anne-Katrin and Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2017. ‘Canonical tag questions in Asian Englishes: forms, functions, and frequencies in Hong Kong English, Indian English, and Singapore English’. In Markku Filppula, Klemola, Juhani and Sharma, Devyani, eds. The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford University Press, 697714.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt and Zeileis, Achim. 2006. ‘Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework’, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3): 651–74.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. ‘Clause type and illocutionary force’. In Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey, eds. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, 851945.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 2006. Hindi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koch, Christopher, Lange, Claudia and Leuckert, Sven. 2016. ‘This hair-style called as “duck tail”: the “intrusive as”-construction in South Asian varieties of English and Learner Englishes’, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2): 151–76.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.). 2012. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 1998. ‘British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit? A study in lexicalisation based on social, regional and stylistic variation’, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23(2): 145–97.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2015. ‘The discovery of the unexpected’, Asia-Pacific Language Variation 1(1): 722.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. ‘Language and woman’s place’, Language in Society 2(1): 4580.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2012. The Syntax of Spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Liaw, Andy and Wiener, Matthew C. 2002. ‘Classification and regression by randomForest’, R News 2(3): 1822.Google Scholar
Lunkenheimer, Kerstin. 2012. ‘Typological profile: L2 varieties’. In Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin, eds. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 845–72.Google Scholar
McElhinny, Bonnie. 2014. ‘Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology: toward effective interventions in gender inequity’. In Ehrlich, Susan, Meyerhoff, Miriam and Holmes, Janet, eds. The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 2nd edition. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 4867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2012. ‘Regional profile: Asia’. In Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin, eds. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 785805.Google Scholar
Nanda, Serena. 1999. Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India, 2nd edition. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Osella, Caroline. 2017. ‘Utopia interrupted: Indian sex/gender dissident activism and the everyday search for a life worth living’. In Kuldova, Tereza and Varghese, Mathew A., eds. Urban Utopias: Excess and Expulsion in Neoliberal South Asia. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 227–46.Google Scholar
Osella, Caroline and Osella, Filippo. 2006. Men and Masculinities in South India. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Parviainen, Hanna. 2016. ‘The invariant tag isn’t it in Asian Englishes’, World Englishes 35(1): 98117.Google Scholar
Pearson, Ron. 2016. ‘The GoodmanKruskal package: measuring association between categorical variables’ (Manuscript). Retrieved from: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/GoodmanKruskal/vignettes/GoodmanKruskal.html.Google Scholar
Sailaja, Pingali. 2009. Indian English. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Baayen, Harald. 2012. ‘Models, forests and trees of York English: was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice’, Language Variation and Change 24: 135–78.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Mariko. 2014. ‘A comparative study of tag questions in four Asian Englishes from a corpus-based approach’, Asian Englishes 16(2): 101–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel and Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. ‘Tag questions in British and American English’, Journal of English Linguistics 34(4): 283311.Google Scholar
Valentine, Tamara M. 1991. ‘Getting the message across: discourse markers in Indian English’, World Englishes 10(3): 325–34.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×