Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T11:58:09.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Social Intelligence

from Part VI - Kinds of Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

By
John F. Kihlstrom  and
Nancy Cantor
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews the literature on social intelligence (SI) as it has evolved over the century since Thorndike (1920) popularized the concept. Most research on SI has been guided by an ability view, and an analogy to IQ, as exemplified by the George Washington University Social Intelligence Test, and the “behavioral” contents in Guilford’s Structure of Intellect. The assessment of SI is important for the assessment of intellectual disability (mental retardation) and the autistic spectrum, but raises the question of whether SI is a qualitatively different form of intelligence, or simply general intelligence applied in social situations. The chapter proposes an alternative knowledge view of SI as the fund of declarative and procedural knowledge which the individual brings to bear on social interactions, especially in the pursuit of important life tasks.

Keywords

autism spectrumcognitive social learning theoryemotional intelligenceintellectual disability (mental retardation)life tasksmoral reasoningmultiple intelligencessocial intelligencesocial neuroscienceStructure of Intellecttriarchic theory
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 756 - 779
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, W. S., Brent, E. E., Carley, K. M., Heise, D. R., Macy, M. W., Markovsky, B., & Skvoretz, J. (1994). Artificial social intelligence. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 407–436. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.002203Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In Wyer, R. S. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Social intelligence and the decoding of nonverbal cues. Intelligence, 13, 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(89)90022-6Google Scholar
Breazeal, C. (2002). Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0043805Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., & Feldman, C. (1993). Theories of mind and the problem of autism. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 267–291). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187–192.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. M., & McCord, D. M. (1996). The WAIS-R Comprehension and Picture Arrangement subtests as measures of social intelligence: Testing traditional interpretations. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 240–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073428299601400305Google Scholar
Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735–750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.6.735Google Scholar
Cantor, N. (2000). Life task problem solving: Situational affordances and personal needs. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. (Eds.), Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives (pp. 100–110). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cantor, N. (2003). Constructive cognition, personal goals, and the social embedding of personality. In Aspinwall, L. G. & Staudinger, U. M. (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental directions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 49–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cantor, N., & Fleeson, W. (1994). Social intelligence and intelligent goal pursuit: A cognitive slice of motivation. In Spaulding, W. D. (Ed.), Integrative views of motivation, cognition, and emotion: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 125–180). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cantor, N., & Harlow, R. (1994). Social intelligence and personality: Flexible life-task pursuit. In Sternberg, R. J. & Ruzgis, P. (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp. 137–168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cantor, N., Kemmelmeier, M., Basten, J., & Prentice, D. A. (2002). Life-task pursuit in social groups: Balancing self-exploration and social integration. Self and Identity, 1, 177–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/152988602317319366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1989). Social intelligence and cognitive assessments of personality. In Wyer, R. S. & Srull, T. K. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Carlston, D. E. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of social cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, S. A., & Michael, W. B. (1993). First-order and higher-order factors of creative social intelligence within Guilford’s structure-of-intellect model: A reanalysis of a Guilford data base. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 619–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003004Google Scholar
Conzelmann, K., Weis, S., & Süss, H. (2013). New findings about social intelligence: Development and application of the Magdeburg Test of Social Intelligence (MTSI). Journal of Individual Differences, 34(3), 119–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.” Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0044919Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London: B. Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004Google Scholar
Davis, K., Christodoulou, J. A., Seider, S., & Gardner, H. (2011). The theory of multiple intelligences. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 485–503). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
deWaal, F. B. M. (2016). Apes know what others believe: Understanding false beliefs is not unique to humans. Science, 354(6308), 39–40.Google Scholar
deWaal, F. B. M., & Ferrari, P. F. (Eds.). (2012). The primate mind: Built to connect with other minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1909). Moral principles in education. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Doll, E. A. (1947). Social maturity scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (Eds.). (2012). SAGE handbook of social cognition. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Prentice, D. (Eds.). (2011). Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2007). Social cognition: From brains to culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1997). Is there a moral intelligence? In Runco, M. (Ed.), The creativity research handbook. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (2015). Diverse brains. General Psychologist, 49(2), 29–37.Google Scholar
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (2003). The theory theory as an alternative to the innateness hypothesis. In Antony, L. & Hornstein, N. L. (Eds.), Chomsky and his critics. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (2011). The Theory Theory 2.0: Probabilistic models and cognitive development. Child Development Perspectives, 5(3), 161–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00179.xGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, S., & Love, P. F. (1997). Social intelligence and developmental disorder: mental retardation, learning disabilities, and autism. In MacLean, W. E. (Ed.), Ellis’ handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 311–342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grieve, R. (2013). Can social intelligence be measured? Psychometric properties of the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale – English Version. Irish Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2012.737758Google Scholar
Hendricks, M., Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, R. (1969). Measuring creative social intelligence. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, University of Southern California, No. 42.Google Scholar
Hoepfner, R., & O’Sullivan, M. (1969). Social intelligence and IQ. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 339–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316446802800211Google Scholar
Hunt, T. (1928). The measurement of social intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 12, 317–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0075832.Google Scholar
Jaarsma, P., & Welin, S. (2011). Autism as a natural human variation: Reflections on the claims of the neurodiversity movement. Health Care Analysis, 20(1), 20–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimenez, A. M., Gee, D. G., Cannon, T. D., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). The social cognitive brain: A review of key individual difference parameters with relevance to schizophrenia. In Roberts, D. L. & Penn, D. L. (Eds.), Social cognition in schizophrenia: From evidence to treatment (pp. 93–119). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250. https://search.proquest.com/docview/615132040?accountid=14496Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2008). The automaticity juggernaut. In Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 155–180). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2009). “So that we might have roses in December”: The functions of autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1179–1192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1618Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2010). Social neuroscience: The footprints of Phineas Gage. Social Cognition, 28(6), 757–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.6.757Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F., Beer, J. S., & Klein, S. B. (2002). Self and identity as memory. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 68–90). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (1989). Social intelligence and personality: There’s room for growth. In Wyer, R. S. & Srull, T. K. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 197–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2000). Social intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 359–379). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2011). Social intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 564–581). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klinger, E., & Cox, W. M. (2011). Motivation and the goal theory of current concerns. In Cox, W. M. & Klinger, E. (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Goal-based approaches to assessment and intervention with addiction and other problems (pp. 1–27). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children’s orientations toward a moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 6, 11–33. https://search.proquest.com/docview/615428030?accountid=14496Google Scholar
Kosmitzki, C., & John, O. P. (1993). The implicit use of explicit conceptions of social intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 11–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90037-4Google Scholar
Landy, F. J. (2006). The long, frustrating and fruitless search for social intelligence: A cautionary tale. In Murphy, K. R. (Ed.), A critique of emotional intelligence: What are the problems and how can they be fixed? (pp. 81–123). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-E., Wong, C. T., Day, J. D., Maxwell, S., & Thorpe, S. (2000). Social and academic intelligences: A multitrait-multimethod study of their crystallized and fluid characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 539–553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00213-5Google Scholar
Lepore, J. (2018). It’s still alive: Two hundred years of “Frankenstein.” New Yorker, February 12–19.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.Google Scholar
Little, B. R., Salmela-Aro, K., & Phillips, S. D. (Eds.). (2007). Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lull, H. G. (1911). Moral instruction through social intelligence. American Journal of Sociology, 17, 47–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/211944Google Scholar
Marlowe, H. A. (1986). Social intelligence: Evidence for multidimensionality and construct independence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 52–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.52Google Scholar
Matarazzo, J. D. (1972). Wechsler’s measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1754073916639667Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507–536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist, 63, 503–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.503Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Manczak, E. (2015). Personality and the life story. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Cooper, M. L. & Larsen, R. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, Personality processes and individual differences, pp. 425–446). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. H. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035002Google Scholar
Moss, F. A. (1931). Preliminary report of a study of social intelligence and executive ability. Public Personnel Studies, 9, 2–9. https://search.proquest.com/docview/614975962?accountid=14496Google Scholar
Moss, F. A., & Hunt, T. (1927). Are you socially intelligent? Scientific American, 137, 108–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0827-108Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (Ed.). (2006). A critique of emotional intelligence: What are the problems and how can they be fixed? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings in social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, M., Guilford, J. P., & deMille, R. (1965). The measurement of social intelligence. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, University of Southern California, No. 34.Google Scholar
Petrides, K. V., Mason, M., & Sevdalis, N. (2011). Preliminary validation of the construct of trait social intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 874–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.029Google Scholar
Riggio, R. E., Messamer, J., & Throckmorton, B. (1991). Social and academic intelligence: Conceptually distinct but overlapping constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 695–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90225-ZGoogle Scholar
Romney, D. M., & Pyryt, M. C. (1999). Guilford’s concept of social intelligence revisited. High Ability Studies, 10, 137–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359813990100202Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS Test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092976Google Scholar
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDGGoogle Scholar
Schneider, R. J., Ackerman, P. L., & Kanfer, R. (1996). To “act wisely in human relations”: Exploring the dimensions of social competence. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 469–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00084-0Google Scholar
Sechrest, L., & Jackson, D. N. (1961). Social intelligence and the accuracy of interpersonal predictions. Journal of Personality, 29, 167–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1961.tb01653.xGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. B., & Cheyney, D. L. (2015). Social cognition. Animal Behaviour, 103, 191–202.Google Scholar
Shanley, L. A., Walker, R. E., & Foley, J. M. (1971). Social intelligence: A concept in search of data. Psychological Reports, 29, 1123–1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1971.29.3f.1123Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (2017). Social intelligence in a multicultural world: What is it? Who needs it? How does it develop? In Budwig, N. & Turiel, E. (Eds.), New perspectives on human development (pp. 313–329). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R., Markus, H., & Miller, P. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 716–792). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Silvera, D. H., Martinussen, M., & Dahl, T. I. (2001). The Tromsø social intelligence scale: A self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 313–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00242Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884852Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In Killen, M. & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In Gilbert, D. T. & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 635–679). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Snyder, S. D., & Michael, W. B. (1983). The relationship between performance on standardized tests in mathematics and reading to two measures of social intelligence and one of academic self-esteem of primary school children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 1141–1148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316448304300424Google Scholar
Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of intelligence. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Successful intelligence in theory, research, and practice. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 308–321). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.37Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. (Eds.). (1986). Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2007). Evaluating the theory-of-mind theory of autism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 311–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00527.xGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. H. (1990). The assessment of social intelligence. Psychotherapy, 27, 445–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.27.3.445Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227–235. https://search.proquest.com/docview/614886569?accountid=14496Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L., & Stein, S. (1937). An evaluation of the attempts to measure social intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 275–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0053850Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (2006). The development of morality. In Eisenberg, N., Damon, W., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotional, and personality development, Vol.3 (6th ed., pp. 789–857). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Turiel, E., Killen, M., & Helwig, C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, functions, and vagaries. In Kagan, J. & Lamb, M. (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124Google Scholar
Vernon, P. E. (1933). Some characteristics of the good judge of personality. Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 42–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1933.9921556Google Scholar
Walker, R. E., & Foley, J. M. (1973). Social intelligence: Its history and measurement. Psychological Reports, 33, 839–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1973.33.3.839Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Weis, S., & Suss, H.-M. (2007). Reviving the search for social intelligence: A multitrait-multimethod study of its structure and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(1), 3–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.027Google Scholar
Whiten, A., & van de Waal, E. (2017). Social learning, culture and the “socio-cultural brain” of human and non-human primates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 82, 58–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.018Google Scholar
Winograd, T. (1975). Frame representations and the procedural-declarative controversy. In Bobrow, D. & Collins, A. (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 185–210). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×