Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:43:19.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Lost in the Socially Extended Mind

Genuine Intersubjectivity and Disturbed Self-Other Demarcation in Schizophrenia

from Part IV - Depression, Schizophrenia, and Dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

Christian Tewes
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University Hospital
Giovanni Stanghellini
Affiliation:
Chieti University
Get access

Summary

Much of the characteristic symptomatology of schizophrenia can be understood as resulting from a pervasive sense of disembodiment. The body is experienced as an external machine that needs to be controlled with explicit intentional commands, which in turn leads to severe difficulties in interacting with the world in a fluid and intuitive manner. In consequence, there is a characteristic dissociality: others become problems to be solved by intellectual effort and no longer present opportunities for spontaneous interpersonal alignment. This leads to a loss of the socially extended mind, which normally affords opportunities for co-regulation of cognitive and affective processes. However, at times people with schizophrenia report that they experience the opposite of dissociality, namely, an unusual fluidity of the self-other boundary as expressed in experiences of ambiguous body boundaries, intrusions, and even merging with others. Here, the person has not lost access to the socially extended mind but has instead become lost in it, possibly due to a weakened sense of self. We argue that this neglected aspect of schizophrenic social dysfunction can be usefully approached via the concept of genuine intersubjectivity: we normally participate in a shared experience with another person by implicitly co-regulating how our interaction unfolds. This integrates our respective experiences’ dynamical bases and gives the interaction an ambiguous second-person character. The upshot is that reports of abnormal self-other fluidity are not indicative of hallucinations without any basis in reality, but of a heightened sensitivity and vulnerability to processes of interpersonal alignment and mutual incorporation that form the normal basis of social life. We conclude by discussing implications of this view for both the science of consciousness as well as approaches to intervention and therapy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Time and Body
Phenomenological and Psychopathological Approaches
, pp. 318 - 340
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, E., Kalverboer, A. F., & Hopkins, B. (1983). Mother-infant dialogue in the first days of life: An observational study during breast-feeding. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(1), 145161. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1983.tb00111.xGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In Feldman, R. S. & Rimé, B. (Eds.), Studies in emotion & social interaction. Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401432). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Candadai, M., Setzler, M., Izquierdo, E. J., & Froese, T. (2019). Embodied dyadic interaction increases complexity of neural dynamics: A minimal agent-based simulation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00540CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893910. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.893Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2009). Spreading the joy? Why the machinery of consciousness is (probably) still in the head. Mind, 118(472), 963993. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzp110Google Scholar
de Haan, S., & Fuchs, T. (2010). The ghost in the machine: Disembodiment in schizophrenia – Two case studies. Psychopathology, 43, 327333. doi: 10.1159/000319402Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485507. doi: 10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E. A., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441447. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Durt, C., Fuchs, T., & Tewes, C. (Eds.). (2017). Embodiment, enaction, and culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Froese, T. (2018). Searching for the conditions of genuine intersubjectivity: From agent-based models to perceptual crossing experiments. In Newen, A., de Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4e cognition (pp. 163186). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Froese, T., & Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 205235. doi: 10.1007/s11097-012-9254-2Google Scholar
Froese, T., Iizuka, H., & Ikegami, T. (2014). Embodied social interaction constitutes social cognition in pairs of humans: A minimalist virtual reality experiment. Scientific Reports, 4, 110. doi: 10.1038/srep03672Google Scholar
Froese, T., Stanghellini, G., & Bertelli, M. O. (2013). Is it normal to be a principal mindreader? Revising theories of social cognition on the basis of schizophrenia and high functioning autism-spectrum disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(5), 13761387. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.005Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2005). Corporealized and disembodied minds: A phenomenological view of the body in melancholia and schizophrenia. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 12(2), 95107. doi: 10.1353/ppp.2005.0040Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2010). The psychopathology of hyperreflexivity. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 24(3), 239255. doi: 10.1353/jsp.2010.0010Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2013). The phenomenology and development of social perspectives. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 655683. doi: 10.1007/s11097-012-9267-xGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2015). Pathologies of intersubjectivity in autism and schizophrenia. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(1–2), 191214.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2018). Ecology of the brain: The phenomenology and biology of the embodied mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enacting intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465486. doi: 10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508Google Scholar
Galbusera, L., Finn, M. T., & Fuchs, T. (2018). Interactional synchrony and negative symptoms: An outcome study of body-oriented psychotherapy for schizophrenia. Psychotherapy Research, 28(3), 457469. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1216624Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2013). The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 25–26, 412. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.008Google Scholar
Gallotti, M., & Frith, C. D. (2013). Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 160165. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.002Google Scholar
Gerrans, P., & McGeer, V. (2003). Theory of mind in autism and schizophrenia: A case of over-optimistic reverse engineering. In Repacholi, B. & Slaughter, V. (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 271304). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A., & de Vignemont, F. (2009). Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 154159. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.007Google Scholar
Gozé, T., Grohmann, T., Naudin, J., & Cermolacce, M. (2017). New insight into affectivity in schizophrenia: From the phenomenology of Marc Richir. Psychopathology, 50(6), 401407. doi: 10.1159/000481516Google Scholar
Henriksen, M. G., & Nilsson, L. S. (2017). Intersubjectivity and psychopathology in the schizophrenia spectrum: Complicated we, compensatory strategies, and self-disorders. Psychopathology, 50(5), 321333. doi: 10.1159/000479702Google Scholar
Herschbach, M. (2012). On the role of social interaction in social cognition: A mechanistic alternative to enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 467486. doi: 10.1007/s11097-011-9209-zGoogle Scholar
Hobson, J. A., & Hobson, R. P. (2007). Identification: The missing link between joint attention and imitation? Development and Psychopathology, 19(2), 411431. doi: 10.1017/S0954579407070204Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Ilundáin-Agurruza, J. (2020). Selfless activity and experience: Radicalizing minimal self-awareness. Topoi, 39, 50920. doi: 10.1007/s11245-018-9573-1Google Scholar
Kaye, K. (1982). The mental and social life of babies: How parents create persons. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kean, C. (2009). Silencing the self: Schizophrenia as a self-disturbance. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35(6), 10341036. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp043Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, M., & Kiverstein, J. (2019). Extended consciousness and predictive processing: A third wave view. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, J. (2011). Extended cognition and the space of social interaction. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 643657. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, J. (2012). Seeing mind in action. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 149173. doi: 10.1007/s11097-011-9226-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, J. (2013). Ontogenesis of the socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 25–26, 4046. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.001Google Scholar
Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01003Google Scholar
Krueger, J. (in press). Enactivism, other minds, and mental disorders. Synthese.Google Scholar
Krueger, J. (2020). Schizophrenia and the scaffolded self. Topoi, 39, 597609. doi: 10.1007/s11245-018-9547-3.Google Scholar
Krueger, J., & Aiken, A. T. (2016). Losing social space: Phenomenological disruptions of spatiality and embodiment in Moebius syndrome and schizophrenia. In Reynolds, J. & Sebold, R. (Eds.), Phenomenology and science (pp. 121139). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Krueger, J., & Henriksen, M. G. (2016). Embodiment and affectivity in Moebius syndrome and schizophrenia: A phenomenological analysis. In Simmons, J. A. & Hackett, J. E. (Eds.), Phenomenology for the twenty-first century (pp. 249267). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kupper, Z., Ramseyer, F., Hoffmann, H., & Tschacher, W. (2015). Nonverbal synchrony in social interactions of patients with schizophrenia indicates socio-communicative deficits. PLoS ONE, 10, 118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145882CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyselo, M. (2016). The enactive approach and disorders of the self – The case of schizophrenia. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 591616. doi: 10.1007/s11097-015-9441-zGoogle Scholar
Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334339. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14481Google Scholar
Lavelle, M., Healey, P. G. T., & McCabe, R. (2013). Is nonverbal communication disrupted in interactions involving patients with schizophrenia? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(5), 11501158. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs091Google Scholar
Lavelle, M., Healey, P. G. T., & McCabe, R. (2014). Nonverbal behavior during face-to-face social interaction in schizophrenia: A review. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202(1), 4754. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000031Google Scholar
Lysaker, P. H., Johannesen, J. K., & Lysaker, J. T. (2005). Schizophrenia and the experience of intersubjectivity as threat. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(3), 335352. doi: 10.1007/s11097-005-4067-1Google Scholar
Maiese, M. (2015). Embodied selves and divided minds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maiese, M. (2016). Affective scaffolds, expressive arts, and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00359Google Scholar
McGann, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: Enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 417437. doi: 10.1007/s11097-009-9141-7Google Scholar
Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.). (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newen, A., de Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of 4e cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Handest, P. (2003). Phenomenology of anomalous self-experience in early schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 44(2), 121134. doi: 10.1053/comp.2003.50017Google Scholar
Parnas, J., & Henriksen, M. G. (2016). Mysticism and schizophrenia: A phenomenological exploration of the structure of consciousness in the schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 7588. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.010Google Scholar
Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005). EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience. Psychopathology, 38(5), 236258. doi: 10.1159/000088441Google Scholar
Raffard, S., Salesse, R. N., Bortolon, C., Bardy, B. G., Henriques, J., Marin, L., … Capdeville, D. (2018). Using mimicry of body movements by a virtual agent to increase synchronization behavior and rapport in individuals with schizophrenia. Scientific Reports, 8, 110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35813-6Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Rethinking commonsense psychology: A critique of folk psychology, theory of mind and simulation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, M. (2017a). Real hallucinations: Psychiatric illness, intentionality, and the interpersonal world. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, M. (2017b). Selfhood, schizophrenia, and the interpersonal regulation of experience. In Durt, C., Fuchs, T., & Tewes, C. (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction, and culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 149171). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Sass, L. (2017). Madness and modernism: Insanity in the light of modern art, literature, and thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sass, L., Pienkos, E., Škodlar, B., Stanghellini, G., Fuchs, T., Parnas, J., & Jones, N. (2017). EAWE: Examination of Anomalous World Experience. Psychopathology, 50(1), 1054. doi: 10.1159/000454928Google Scholar
Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2003). Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29(3), 427444. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007017Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393462. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000660Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In Cohen, P., Morgan, J., & Pollack, M. E. (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 401415). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Simonsen, A., Fusaroli, R., Skewes, J. C., Roepstorff, A., Campbell-Meiklejohn, D., Mors, O., & Bliksted, V. (2019). Enhanced automatic action imitation and intact imitation-inhibition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45(1), 8795. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby006Google Scholar
Slaby, J. (2014). Emotions and the extended mind. In von Scheve, C. & Salmela, M. (Eds.), Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology (pp. 3246). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spurrett, D., & Cowley, S. J. (2004). How to do things without words: Infants, utterance-activity and distributed cognition. Language Sciences, 26(5), 443466. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2003.09.008Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S. M., & Bhat, A. N. (2013). A review of “music and movement” therapies for children with autism: Embodied interventions for multisystem development. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, 115. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00022Google Scholar
Stanghellini, G. (2004). Disembodied spirits and deanimated bodies: The psychopathology of common sense. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanghellini, G., Ballerini, M., & Mancini, M. (2017). Other persons: On the phenomenology of interpersonal experience in schizophrenia (ancillary article to EAWE Domain 3). Psychopathology, 50(1), 7582. doi: 10.1159/000456037Google Scholar
Stephensen, H., & Parnas, J. (2018). What can self-disorders in schizophrenia tell us about the nature of subjectivity? A psychopathological investigation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17, 629642. doi: 10.1007/s11097-017-9532-0Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2008). Between individual and collective memory: Coordination, interaction, distribution. Social Research, 75(1), 2348.Google Scholar
Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., & Barnier, A. J. (2010). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 521560. doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9182-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taipale, J. (2016). Self-regulation and beyond: Affect regulation and the infant-caregiver dyad. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00889Google Scholar
Talwar, N., Crawford, M. J., Maratos, A., Nur, U., McDermott, O., & Procter, S. (2006). Music therapy for in-patients with schizophrenia: Exploratory randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 405409. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015073Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. (2005). Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals’ states of consciousness: Coherence governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. In Nadel, J. & Muir, D. (Eds.), Emotional development: Recent research advances (pp. 293316). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15(1), 7174. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.xGoogle Scholar
Van Duppen, Z. (2017). The intersubjective dimension of schizophrenia. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(4), 399418. doi: 10.1353/ppp.2017.0058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S. (2013). Vulnerability to psychosis, I-thou intersubjectivity and the praecox-feeling. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 131143. doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9173-zGoogle Scholar
Varga, S., & Krueger, J. (2013). Background emotions, proximity and distributed emotion regulation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(2), 271292. doi: 10.1007/s13164-013-0134-7Google Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.xGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, D. (1999). Self-awareness and alterity: A phenomenological investigation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2001). Husserl and transcendental intersubjectivity: A response to the linguistic-pragmatic critique. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2014). Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×