Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T20:21:48.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Passive-Aggressive or Just Engaged

New Active Ownership Approaches through Benchmarks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

By
David E. Harris
Edited by
Paul G. Fisher
Paul G. Fisher
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Far from their image as a boring technical tool of the financial world, indexes are becoming a critical lever for investors to raise market-wide standards and to catalyse sustainable corporate business models. Investors can choose from a wide spectrum of benchmarks to suit their precise needs. The rise of benchmarks and passive investments, then ‘smart beta’ and now the emergence of ‘smart sustainability’ has been a global phenomenon, and the stage is now set for their powerful application in active ownership strategies.

Keywords

Benchmarkpassive investment index ESGUniversal Investorsmart betasmart sustainabilityactive ownershipengagement stewardshipasset ownersustainable investmentFTSE
Type
Chapter
Information
Making the Financial System Sustainable , pp. 214 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, B., Manyika, J., Koller, T., Palter, R. and Godsall, J. (2017), ‘Measuring the Economic Impact of Short-Termism’. McKinsey Global Institute Discussion Paper. www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured insights/Long term Capitalism/Where companies with a long term view outperform their peers/MGI-Measuring-the-economic-impact-of-short-termism.ashx.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018a), ‘Final Report of the High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance’. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/180131-sustainable-finance-report_en.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018b), ‘Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth’. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0097&from=EN.Google Scholar
GPIF ESG Report (2018), ‘For All Generations’. www.gpif.go.jp/en/investment/190905_Esg_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. and Rajgopal, S. (2005), ‘The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 40(1–3) 3–73. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:40:y:2005:i:1-3:p:3-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. and Rajgopal, S. (2006), ‘Value Destruction and the Financial Reporting Decisions’, Financial Analysts Journal 62(6), 27–39.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. H. and Liu, Y. (2016) ‘Does Scale Impact Skill?’, Duke I&E Research Paper No. 2016-46. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2872385.Google Scholar
Kaplan, P. and Kowara, M. (2019) ‘Are Relative Performance Measures Useless?’, The Journal of Investing 28(4), 83–93.Google Scholar
Kay, J. (2012) ‘The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision Making’, Interim Report. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31544/12-631-kay-review-of-equity-markets-interim-report.pdf and Final Report: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253454/bis-12-917-kay-review-of-equity-markets-final-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, J. (2019) ‘A Users Guide to the ESG Confusion’, Wall Street Journal, 19 November 2019. www.wsj.com/articles/a-users-guide-to-the-esg-confusion-11573563604.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. (1952), ‘Portfolio Selection’, Journal of Finance, March, 7(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
Sharpe, S. (1970), Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×