Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T00:34:58.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Effects of Environmental Chemicals on Male Reproduction

from Section 2 - Clinical Evaluation of the Infertile Male

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2023

Larry I. Lipshultz
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Stuart S. Howards
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Craig S. Niederberger
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Dolores J. Lamb
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Get access

Summary

The potential for chemicals and toxicants to adversely impact health and reproduction is not a new concern; it dates back to biblical times, ancient Egypt, Greece, and the Roman Empire [1, 2]. However, it was not until the middle of the twentieth century that concerns about the effects of chemicals on reproduction were raised. In 1962, Rachel Carlson published her landmark book The Silent Spring, in which she described the harmful effects of pesticides on wildlife reproduction [3]. She is credited with starting the environmental movement, leading to the establishment of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) in 1966 [4] and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in 1970 [5]. The mission of the NIEHS is to “discover how the environment affects people, in order to promote healthier lives and to provide global leadership for innovative research that improves public health by preventing disease and disability.” The mission of NIOSH is to “generate new knowledge in the field of occupational safety and health and to transfer that knowledge into practice for the betterment of workers.” Through the stewardship of these agencies, as well as those in Europe and the World Health Organization (WHO), research in the fields of occupational and environmental effects on reproduction has dramatically increased [6–8]. Nonetheless, relatively few of the thousands of chemicals used in the workplace or as ingredients in commonly used products, or identified in the environment (air, water, earth, and food), have been examined for their effects on reproductive function. Of those chemicals that have been studied, few have been definitively shown to induce reproductive toxicity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Bonde, JP, Flachs, EM, Rinborg, S, et al. The epidemiologic evidence linking prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals with male reproductive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23:104–25.Google Scholar
Gore, AC, Chappell, VA, Fenton, SE, et al. Executive summary to EDC-2: the Endocrine Society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endo Rev 2015;36:593602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Endocrine disruptors: from scientific evidence to human health protection. Brussels: European Parliament, 2019.Google Scholar
Schug, TT, Johnson, AF, Birnbaum, LS, et al. Mini review: Endocrine disruptors: past lessons and future directions. Mol Endocrinol 2016;30:833–47.Google Scholar
Skakkebaek, NE, Rajpert-De Meyts, E, Buck Louis, GM, et al. Male reproductive disorders and fertility trends: Influences of environment and genetic susceptibility. Physiol Rev 2016;96:5597.Google Scholar

References

Gallo, MA. History and scope of toxicology. In: Klaassen, CD, ed. Casarett and Doulll’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2018; pp. 310.Google Scholar
Rosner, F. Medicine in the Bible and Talmud. New York, NY: Yeshiva University Press, 1977.Google ScholarPubMed
Carson, R. Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Mariner Books, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1962.Google Scholar
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Available from: www.niehs.nih.gov.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Available from: www.cdc.gov/niosh.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO IPCS global assessment of the state of the science of endocrine disruptors of EDCs. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.Google Scholar
Schug, TT, Johnson, AF, Birnbaum, LS, et al. Mini review: Endocrine disruptors: past lessons and future directions. Mol Endocrinol 2016;30:833–47.Google Scholar
Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Endocrine disruptors: from scientific evidence to human health protection. Brussels: European Parliament, 2019.Google Scholar
Sokol, R. Environmental toxins and male fertility in male reproductive dysfunction pathology and treatment. In: Kandeel, F, ed. Male Reproductive Dysfunction: Pathophysiology and Treatment. London: Informa Health Care, 2007; pp. 245–50.Google Scholar
Brehm, E, Flaws, JA. Endocrinology transgenerational effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on male and female reproduction. Endocrinology 2019;160:1421–35.Google Scholar
Amann, RP. The use of animal models to for detecting specific alteration in reproduction. Fund Appl Tox 1986; 2:1326.Google Scholar
Kilcoyne, KR, Mitchell, RT. Effect of environmental and pharmaceutical exposures on fetal testis development and function: a systematic review of human experimental data. Hum Reprod Update 2019;25:197421.Google Scholar
Stossi, F, Singh, PK, Mistry, RM, et al. Quality control for single cell imaging analytics using endocrine disruptor-induced changes in estrogen receptor expression 2022. Environ Health Perspect 2022;130:214.Google Scholar
Woodruff, TJ. Bridging epidemiology and model organisms to increase understanding of endocrine disrupting chemicals and human health effects. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2011;127:108–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, D, Lilienfeld, D. Lilienfeld’s Foundations of Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Skakkebaek, NE, Rajpert-De Meyts, E, Buck Louis, GM, et al. Male reproductive disorders and fertility trends: Influences of environment and genetic susceptibility. Physiol Rev 2016;96:5597.Google Scholar
Colburn, T, Dumanoski, D, Myers, JP. Our Stolen Future. New York, NY: Penguin Random House, 1996.Google Scholar
Sharpe, NE, Skakkebaek, NE. Are oestrogens involved infalling sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract? Lancet 1993;31:1392–95.Google Scholar
Sharpe, RM. The oestrogen hypothesis – where do we stand now? Int J Androl 2003;26:215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gore, AC, Chappell, VA, Fenton, SE, et al. Executive summary to EDC-2: the Endocrine Society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endo Rev 2015;36:593602.Google Scholar
Skakkebaek, NE, Raipert-DE Meyts, E, Main, KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod 2001;16:972–8.Google Scholar
Witchel, SF, Lee, PA. Ambiguous genitalia. In: Sperling, MA, ed. Sperling Pediatric Endocrinology, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2014; pp. 108–56.Google Scholar
Welsh, M, Saunder, PT, Fiskin, M, et al. Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism. J Clin Invest 2008;118:1479–90.Google Scholar
Schwartz, CL, Christiansen, S, Vinggaard, AM, Axelstad, M, Hass, U, Singen, T. Anogenital distance as a toxicological or clinical marker for fetal androgen action and risk for reproductive disorders. Arch Toxicol 2019;93:253–72.Google Scholar
Mitchel, RT, Mungall, W, McKinnell, C, et al. Anogenital distance plasticity in adulthood: implications for its use as a biomarker of fetal androgen action. Endocrinology 2015;156:2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callegari, C, Everett, S, Ross, M, Brasel, J. Anogenital ratio: measure of fetal virilization in premature and full-term and newborn infants. J Pediatrics 1987;111:240–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swan, SH, Main, KM, Liu, F, et al.; Study for Future Families Research Team. Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1056–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martino-Andrade, AJ, Liu, F, Sathyanarayana, S, et al.; TIDES Study Team. Timing of prenatal phthalate exposure in relation to genital endpoints in male newborns. Andrology 2016;4:585–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salazar-Martinez, E. Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Environ Health 2004;3:16.Google Scholar
Sokol, RZ, Madding, CE, Swerdloff, RS. Lead toxicity and the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis. Biol Reprod 1985;33:722–8.Google Scholar
Benoff, S, Jacob, A, Hurley, IR. Male infertility and environmental exposure to lead and cadmium. Hum Reprod Update 2000;6:107–21.Google Scholar
Sokol, RZ. Lead exposure and its effects on the reproductive system. In: Golub, MS, ed. Metals, Fertility, and Reproductive Toxicity. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 2006; pp. 117–54.Google Scholar
Wirth, JJ, Mijal, RS. Adverse effects of low level heavy metal exposure on male reproductive function. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2010;56:147–67.Google Scholar
Apostoli, P, Kiss, P, Porru, S, et al. Male reproductive toxicity of lead in animals and humans. ASCLEPIOS study group. Occup Environ Med 1998;55:364–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancranjan, I, Popescu, HI, Gavanescu, O, et al. Reproductive ability of workmen occupationally exposed to lead. Arch Environ Health 1975;30:396401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullen, MR, Robbins, JM, Eskenazi, B. Adult inorganic lead intoxication: presentation of 31 new cases and a review of recent advances in the literature. Medicine 1983;62:221–47.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. Lead poisoning: a historical perspective. 1985. Available from: archive.epa.gov/epa/aboutepa/lead-poisoning-historical-perspective.html.Google Scholar
Gill, LL. Your herbs and spices might contain arsenic, cadmium, and lead. 2021. Available from: www.consumerreports.org/food-safety/your-herbs-and-spices-might-contain-arsenic-cadmium-and-lead/.Google Scholar
Golub, MS, ed. Metals, Fertility, and Reproductive Toxicity. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Martenies, SE, Perry, MJ. Environmental and occupational pesticide exposure and human sperm parameters: a systematic review. Toxicology 2013;307:6673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P, Maipas, S, Kotampasi, C, Stamatis, P, Hens, L. Chemical pesticides and human health: the urgent need for a new concept in agriculture. Front Public Health 2016;4:148–54.Google Scholar
NSW Environmental Protection Authority. Available from: epa.nsw.gov.au.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority. Available from: efsa.europa.eu.Google Scholar
Whorton, D, Krauss, RM, Marshall, S, Milby, TH. Infertility in male pesticide workers. Lancet 1977;2:1259–61.Google Scholar
Whorton, D, Foliart, D. DPCP: eleven years later. Reprod Tox 1988;2:155–61.Google Scholar
Lantz, GD, Cunningham, GR, Huckins, C, Lipshultz, LI. Recovery from severe oligospermia after exposure to dibromochloropropane. Fertil Steril 1981;35:4653.Google Scholar
Hwang, K, Eisenberg, ML, Walters, RC, Lipshultz, LL. Gonodatoxic effects of DBCP: a historical review and current concepts. Open Urol Nephrol J 2013;6:2630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawaii State Department of Health. 2018 Groundwater status report. 2019. Available from: health.hawaii.gov.Google Scholar
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. DBCP in drinking water. 2020. Available from: oehha.ca.gov.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A, Pandey, RS, Sharma, B. Water Pollution with Special Reference to Pesticide Contamination in India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection. 2010;2(5): 432–448. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2010.25050.Google Scholar
Veterans and Agent Orange. Committee to review the health effects in Vietnam veterans of exposure to herbicides, 4th Biennial Update, 2003.Google Scholar
Townsend, JC, Bodner, KM, D Van Peenen, PF, Olson, RD, Cook, RK. Survey of reproductive events of wives of employees exposed to chlorinated dioxins Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:695713.Google Scholar
Suskind, RR, Hertzberg, VS. Human health effects of 2,4,5-T and its toxic contaminants JAMA 1984;251:2372–80.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Dioxins and their effects on human health. 2016. Available from: www.who.int.Google Scholar
PubChem. Dioxins. Available from: pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.Google Scholar
Toppari, J, Larsen, JC, Christiansen, P, et al. Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect 1996;104:741803.Google Scholar
Vinggaard, AM, Hnida, C, Larsen, JC. Environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons affect androgen receptor activation in vitro. Toxicology 2000;145:173–83.Google Scholar
Canady, R, Crump, K, Feeley, M, et al. Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2002. Available from: www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v48je20.htm.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. 2018. Available from: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565196.Google Scholar
Lassen, TH, Frederiksen, H, Jensen, TK, et al. Urinary bisphenol A levels in young men: association with reproductive hormones and semen quality. Environ Health Perspect 2014;122:478–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demeneix, B, Slama, R. Endocrine disruptors: from scientific evidence to human health protection. Policy Department for Citizens Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union, European Parliament PE 608.866. 2019. Available from: www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses.Google Scholar
Calafat, AM, Ye, X, Wong, L-Y, Reidy, JA, Needham, LL. Exposure of the US population to bisphenyl A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2001–2004. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:3944.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, LN, Hauser, R, Marcus, M, Olea, N, Welshons, WV. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod Toxicol 2007;24:139–77.Google Scholar
Boobis, A, Budinsky, R, Collie, S, et al. Critical analysis of the literature on low-dose synergy for use in screening chemical mixtures for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 2011;41:369–83.Google Scholar
Heindel, JJ, Newbold, RR, Bucher, JR, et al. NIEHS/FDA Clarity-BPA research program update. Reprod Toxicol 2015;58:3344.Google Scholar
Vom Saal, FS, Akingbemi, BT, Belcher, SM, et al.; Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact health at current levels of exposure. Reprod Toxicol 2007;24:131–8.Google Scholar
National Toxicology Program. Draft NTP research report on the CLARITY-BPA Core Study: a perinatal and chronic extended-dose-range study of bisphenol A in rats. 2018. Available from: ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/rrprp/2018/april/rr09peerdraft.pdf.Google Scholar
Prins, GS, Patisaul, HB, Belcher, SM, Vandenberg, LN. Clarity-BPA academic laboratory studies identify consistent low-dose bisphenol A effects on multiple organ systems. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2019;3:1431.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, LN, Hunt, PA, Gore, AC. Endocrine disruptors and the future of toxicology testing-lessons from CLARITY-BPA. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019;15:366–74.Google Scholar
Berger, PA, Eskenazi, B, Kogut, K, et al. Association of prenatal urinary concentrations of phthalates and bisphenol A and pubertal timing in boys and girls. Environ Health Perspect 2018;126:19.Google Scholar
Braun, JM, Hauser, R. Bisphenol A and children’s health. Curr Opin Pediatrics 2011;23:233–9.Google Scholar
Melnick, R, Lucier, G, Wolfe, M, et al. Summary of the National Toxicology Program’s report of the endocrine disruptors low-dose peer review. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110:427–31.Google Scholar
Louis, GMB, Sundaram, R, Sweeney, AM, Schisterman, EF, Maisog, J, Kannan, K. Urinary bisphenol A, phthalates, and couple fecundity: T C-Ghe Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1359–66.Google Scholar
Hipwell, AE, Kahn, LG, Factor-Litvak, P, Porucznik, CA, Siegel, EL, Fichorova, RN. Exposure to non-persistent chemicals in consumer products and fecundability: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2019;25:5171.Google Scholar
National Toxicology Program (NTP). Bisphenol A (BPA). 2010. Available from: ntp.niehs.nih.gov.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, LN, Maffini, MV, Sonnenschein, C, Rubin, BS, Soto, AM. Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev 2009;30:7595.Google Scholar
Peretz, J, Vrooman, L, Ricke, WA, et al. Bisphenol A and reproductive health: update of experimental and human evidence, 2007–2013. Environ Health Perspect 2014;122:775–86.Google Scholar
National Research Council (US) Committee on the Health Risks of Phthalates. Phthalates and cumulative risk assessment: the tasks ahead. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Zota, AR, Calafat, AM, Woodruff, TJTemporal trends in phthalate exposures: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2010Environ Health Perspect 2014;122:235–41.Google Scholar
International Peer Reviewed Chemical Safety Information (INCHEM). WHO International Programme on Chemical S660. Safety. Bis (2-ethylhexyl phthalate). 2001. Available from: www.inchem.org.Google Scholar
Skinner, MK. Endocrine disruptors in 2015: epigenetic transgenerational inheritance. Endocr Nat Rev Endocrinol 2016;12:6870.Google Scholar
Dorman, DC, Chui, W, Hales, BF, et al. Systemic reviews and meta-analyses of human and animal evidence of prenatal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and changes in male anogenital distance. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2018;21:207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, SH, Main, KM, Liu, F, et al. Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1056–10.Google Scholar
Bornehag, C-G, Carlstedt, F, Jonsson, BAG, Lindh, CH, Jensen, TK, Bodin, A. Prenatal phthalate exposures and anogenital distance in Swedish boys. Environ Health Perspect 2015;123:10–7.Google Scholar
Adibi, JJ, Lee, MK, Naimi, AI, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin partially mediates phthalate association with male and female anogenital distance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:1216–24.Google Scholar
Meeker, JD, Ferguson, KK. Urinary phthalate metabolites are associated with decreased serum testosterone in men, women, and children from NHANES 2011–2012. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:4346–52.Google Scholar
Thurston, SW, Mendiola, J, Bellamy, AR, et al. Phthalate exposure and semen quality in fertile US men. Andrology 2016;4:632–8.Google Scholar
Hauser, R, Meeker, JD, Duty, S, Silva, MJ, Calafat, AM. Altered semen quality in relation to urinary concentrations of phthalate monoester and oxidative metabolites. Epidemiology 2006;17:682–91.Google Scholar
Axelsson, J, Rylander, L, Rignell-Hydbom, A, Jonsson, BA, Lindh, CH, Giwercman, A. Prenatal phthalate exposure and reproductive function in young men. Environ Res 2015;138:264–70.Google Scholar
Zarean, M, Keikha, M, Poursafa, P, Khalighenejad, P, Amin, M, Kelishadi, R. A systemic review on the adverse health effects of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;23:24642–93.Google Scholar
Radke, EG, Braun, JM, Meeker, JD, Cooper, GS. Phthalate exposure and male reproductive outcomes: a systematic review of the human epidemiological evidence. Environ Int 2018;121:764–93.Google Scholar
Messerlian, C, Williams, PL, Ford, JB, et al. The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study: a prospective preconception cohort. Hum Reprod Open 2018;2018:hoy001.Google Scholar
Dodge, LE, Williams, MA, Missmer, SA, Douter, I, Calafat, AM, Hauser, R. Associations between paternal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and reproductive outcomes among couples seeking fertility treatment. Reprod Toxicol 2015;58:184219.Google Scholar
Buck Louis, GM, Barr, DB, Kannan, K, Chen, Z, Kim, S, Sundaram, R. Paternal exposures to environmental chemicals and time-to-pregnancy: overview of results from the LIFE study. Andrology 2016;4:639–47.Google Scholar
Hipwell, AE, Khan, LG, Factor-Litvak, P, et al. Exposure to non-persistent chemicals in consumer products and fecundability: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2019;25:5171.Google Scholar
Carlsen, E, Giwercman, A, Keiding, N, Skakkebaek, NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. Br Med J 1992;305:609–13.Google Scholar
Swan, SH, Brazil, C, Drobnis, EZ, et al. Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:414–20.Google Scholar
Fisch, H, Goluboff, ET, Olson, JH, Feldshuh, J, Broder, SJ, Barad, DH. Semen analyses in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality. Fertil Steril 1996;65:1009–14.Google Scholar
Acacio, BD, Gottfied, T, Israel, R, Sokol, RZ. Evaluation of a large cohort of men presenting for a screening semen analysis. Fertil Steril 2000;73:595–7.Google Scholar
Swan, SH, Elkin, EP, Fenster, L. The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934–1996. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:961–6.Google Scholar
Bonde, JP, Ramiau-Hansen, CH, Olsen, J. Trends in sperm counts: the saga continues. Epidemiology 2011;22:617–19.Google Scholar
Levine, H, Jorgensen, N, Martino-Andrade, A, Mendiola, J, Weksler-Derri, D. Temperal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23:646–59.Google Scholar
Bonde, JP, Flachs, EM, Rinborg, S, et al. The epidemiologic evidence linking prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals with male reproductive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23:104–25.Google Scholar
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E, Bourguignon, J-P, Giudice, LC, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev 2009;30:293342.Google Scholar
Nohynek, G, Borgert, CJ, Dietrich, D, Rozman, KK. Endocrine disruption: fact or urban legend? Toxicol Lett 2013;223:295305.Google Scholar
Rooney, AA, Boyles, AL, Wolf, MS, Bucher, JR, Thayer, KA. Systematic review and evidence for literature-based environmental health science assessments. Environ Health Perspect 2014;122:711–18.Google Scholar
Segal, TR, Guidice, LC. Before the beginning: environmental exposures and reproductive and obstetrical outcomes. Fertil Steril 2019;112:613–21.Google Scholar
Kriebel, D, Tickner, J, Epstein, P, et al. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109:871–6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×