Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:28:06.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Creating an Evidence Base for Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2022

Prema Clarke
Affiliation:
Independent scholar
Get access

Summary

The chapter begins by describing the content of the micro and meso levels that make up the ecosystem necessary to promote learning. In the past decades, knowledge generated on quality education has led to “discrete and disruptive” interventions with manageable and disaggregated components that fit into the worldview of the mostly distant donor (a “hawk’s eye” approach). An organically integrated approach is constructively worked out, which provides a framework for analyzing micro and meso levels (a “turtle’s feet” approach). The conceptual framework that structures this knowledge generation includes three areas that define micro and meso institutions: composite history, tangled milieus, and embedded mindsets. This research framework allows for the design and implementation of interventions that fit the ecosystem in a country that drives how things work on the ground. The chapter argues that such a shift in knowledge generation will help to design interventions that enable meso institutions to intervene for consistent and effective teaching and learning to take place in schools in developing countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiyar, Yamini and Bhattacharya, Shrayana. 2016 The Post Office Paradox: A Case Study of the Block Level Education Bureaucracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 51 (11), 6169.Google Scholar
Altinyelken, Hulya Kosar. 2018. Converging Pedagogy in the Global South? Insights from Uganda and Turkey. In Verger, Antoni, Novelli, Mario, and Altinyelken, Hulya Kosar (eds.), Global Education Policy and International Development: New Agendas, Issues, and Policies, pp. 210232. Bloomsbury, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Matt, Pritchett, Lant, and Woolcock, Michael. 2017. Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bamberger, Michael, Rao, Vijayendra, and Woolcock, Michael. 2010. Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from International Development. Policy Research working paper. WPS 5245. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Barrera-Osorio, Felipe, Fasih, Tazeen, Patrinos, Harry Anthony, and Lucrecia, Santibáñez,. 2009. Decentralized Decision-Making in Schools: The Theory and Evidence on School-based Management. Directions in Human Development. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Beech, Jason. 2006. The Theme of Educational Transfer in Comparative Education: A View over Time. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1 (1), 113.Google Scholar
Beeharry, Girindre. 2021. The Pathway to Progress on SDG 4 Requires the Global Education Architecture to Focus on Foundational Learning and to Hold Ourselves Accountable for Achieving It. In Center for Global Development, The Pathway to Progress on SDG 4: A Symposium – A Collection of Essays, pp. 220. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Berryman, Sue E. and Caillaud, Fadilla. 2017. Education Public Expenditure Reviews for Eastern and Southern Africa: The Good, the Bad and the Future. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blimpo, Moussa P., Evans, David K.. 2011. School-Based Management and Educational Outcomes: Lessons from a Randomized Field Experiment. UNESCO, IIEP, Paris.Google Scholar
Bridges, Kate and Woolcock, Michael. 2017. How (Not) to Fix Problems That Matter: Assessing and Responding to Malawi’s History of Institutional Reform. Policy Research Working Paper 8289. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Brinkerhoff, Derick W., Frazer, Sarah, and McGregor, Lisa. 2018. Adapting to Learn and Learning to Adapt: Practical Insights from International Development Projects. Research Triangle International, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Broadfoot, Patricia. 2001. Editorial: Culture, Learning and Comparative Education. Comparative Education, 37 (3), 261266.Google Scholar
Bruns, Barbara, and Luque, Javier. 2015. Great Teachers. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Clarke, Prema. 2017. Making use of assessments for creating stronger education systems and improving teaching and learning. Background paper for the Global Education Monitoring Report: Accountability in Education: Meeting our Commitments. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
Clarke, Prema. 2001. East India Company: Progress of Education in India 1907–12. In Teaching and Learning: The Culture of Pedagogy. Sage, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Chelsky, Jeff. 2019. Blog: Measuring Up: When “What Works” Doesn’t. What an essay about closing the achievement gap in United States public schools tells us about “what works” in international development. September 3. https://bit.ly/3yhrtF2.Google Scholar
Chen, Li-Kai, Dorn, Emma, Sarakatsannis, Jimmy, and Wiesinger, Anna. 2021. Teacher Survey: Learning Loss Is Global – and Significant. Mckinsey and Company. https://mck.co/3M9llCJ.Google Scholar
Cobb, Jessica. 2017. Inequality Frames: How Teachers Inhabit Color-Blind Ideology. Sociology of Education, 90 (4), 315332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grauwe, Anton. 2004. The Quality Imperative School-Based Management (SBM): Does it Improve Quality? Background Paper Prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2005. UNESCO, IIEP, Paris.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus and Cartwright, Nancy. 2017. Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Trials. NBER Working Paper No. 22595.Google Scholar
DFID. 2018. Education Policy: Get Children Learning. UK Aid, London.Google Scholar
Elmore, Richard. 2009. School Improvement and the Reduction in Poverty. In Bane, Mary Jo and Zenteno, Rene (eds.), Poverty and Poverty Alleviation Strategies in North America, pp. 165200. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fuller, Bruce and Clarke, Prema. 1994. Raising School Effects while Ignoring Culture? Local Conditions and the Influence of Classroom Tools, Rules, and Pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64 (1), 119157.Google Scholar
Gillies, John. 2010. The Power of Persistence Education System Reform and Aid Effectiveness Case Studies in Long-Term Education Reform. USAID and Equip 2, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gove, Amber, Brunette, Tracy, Bulat, Jennae, Carrol, Bidemi, Henny, Catherine, Macon, Wykia, Nderu, Evangeline, and Sitabkhan, Yasmin. 2017. Assessing the Impact of Early Learning Programs in Africa. In Pugh, Kenneth R., McCardle, Peggy, and Stutzman, Annie (eds.), Global Approaches to Early Learning Research and Practice. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. No. 158, pp. 2541. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Guba, Egon G. 1990. The Paradigm Dialog. Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
Hoff, Karla and Pandey, Priyanka. 2004. Belief Systems and Durable Inequalities: An Experimental Investigation of Indian Caste. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Jason, Mike. 2021. What We Got Wrong in Afghanistan. The Atlantic. August 12. https://bit.ly/3OT97QG.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast, and Slow. Farrer, Straus and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2008. “Culture Influences Brain Function, Study Shows.” ScienceDaily, 13 January. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080111102934.htm.Google Scholar
Miles, Mathew B. and Huberman, A. Michael. 1994. Qualitative Analysis of Data: A Methods Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Morsya, Leila, Khavensonb, Tatiana, and Carnoy, Martin. 2018. How International Tests Fail to Inform Policy: The Unsolved Mystery of Australia’s Steady Decline in PISA. International Journal of Education Development, 60, 6079.Google Scholar
Müller-Crepon, Carl. 2020. Continuity or Change? (In)direct Rule in British and French Colonial Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Muralidharan, Karthik and Singh, Abhijeet. 2020. Improving Public Sector Management at Scale? Experimental Evidence on School Governance India. Working Paper 28129. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Park, Denise C. and Huang, Chih-Mao. 2010. Culture Wires the Brain: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5 (4), 391400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2014. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Piper, Benjamin, Destafano, Joseph, Kinyanjui, Esther, and Ong’ele, Salome. 2018. Scaling Up Successfully: Lessons from Kenya’s Tusome National Literacy Program. Journal of Educational Change, 19, 293321.Google Scholar
Piper, Benjamin, Ong’ele, Salome, and Kinyanjui, Esther. (No date). Presentation: Impact at National Scale? Measuring Changes in Learning under the Tusome Literacy Programme. https://bit.ly/3JIHMwE.Google Scholar
Reich, Justin et al. 2020. Remote Learning Guidance from State Education Agencies. During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A First Look. Teaching Systems Lab. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Kenneth N., and Mahlck, Lars, eds. 1990. Planning the Quality of Education: The Collection and Use of Data for Informed Decision-Making. UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning, Paris.Google Scholar
Saavedra, Jaime. 2018. Tackling the Learning Crisis: What if Everyone Would Simply Do Their Job? April 14. Blog. World Bank, https://bit.ly/3P2chlp.Google Scholar
Sabarwal, Shwetlena and Abu-Jawdeh, Malek. 2018. What Teachers Believe: Mental Models about Accountability, Absenteeism, and Student Learning. Policy Research Working Paper No. 8454. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, Nadia, Gorard, Stephen, and See, Beng Huat. 2018. The Importance of Process Evaluation for Randomised Control Trials in Education. Educational Research, 60 (3), 357370.Google Scholar
Steiner-Khamsi, Gita. 2010. The Politics and Economics of Comparison. Comparative Education Review, 54 (3), 323342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styles, Ben and Torgerson, Carole. 2018. Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Education Research: Methodological Debates, Questions, Challenges. Educational Research, 60 (3), 255264,Google Scholar
Taylor, Kate. 2021. 13,000 School Districts, 13,000 Approaches to Teaching During COVID. New York Times. January 21, www.nytimes.com/2021/01/21/us/schools-coronavirus.html.Google Scholar
USAID. 2018. US Government Strategy on International Basic Education Fiscal Years 2019–2023. Updated March 1, 2021. USAID, Washington DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2022. World Bank Education Overview: Strategy. Updated April 18, 2022. World Bank. www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/overview#2.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2021. Education Overview Updated March 28, 2021. www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/overview#2.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2020a. India Strengthening Teaching-Learning and Results for States. Project Appraisal Document. Report No. 166868. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2020b. Learning for All: Investing in People’s Knowledge and Skills to Promote Development. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2015. World Development Report 2015. Mind, Society, and Behavior. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Cameroon: Governance and Management in the Education Sector. Report No. 67201-CM. Africa Region, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank, UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Building Evidence in Education Global Group. 2020. Cost Effective Approaches to Improve Global Learning: What does recent evidence tell us are “Smart Buys” for improving learning in low- and middle-income countries? World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×