Aikhenvald, Alexandra. (1999). Areal diffusion and language contact in the Içana-Vaupés basin, north-west Amazonia. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra (eds.), The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 385–416.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra(2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra(2003). A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Assis, Elias. (2001). Patrões e fregueses no Alto Rio Negro: As relações de dominação no discurso do povo Dâw. BA thesis, Universidade do Amazonas, Brazil.Google Scholar

Bahuchet, Serge. (1993). History of the inhabitants of the central African rain forest: Perspectives from comparative linguistics. In Hladik, C. M., Pagezy, H., Hladick, A. O., and Linares, F. (eds.), Tropical forests, people, and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development. Paris: UNESCO and Parthenon, 37–54.Google Scholar

Bahuchet, Serge and Guillaume, Henri. (1982). Aka-farmer relations in the northwest Congo basin. In Leacock, Eleanor and Lee, Richard (eds.), Politics and history in band societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 189–211.Google Scholar

Bahuchet, Serge, McKey, Doyle, and de Garine, Igore. (1991). Wild yams revisited: Is independence from agriculture possible for rainforest hunter-gatherers? Human Ecology 19: 213–243.Google Scholar

Bailey, Robert, Head, Genevieve, Jenike, Mark, Owen, Bruce, Rechtman, Robert, and Zechenter, Elzbieta. (1989). Hunting and gathering in tropical rain forest: Is it possible? American Anthropologist 91(1): 59–82.Google Scholar

Balée, William. (1992). People of the fallow: A historical ecology of foraging in lowland South America. In Redford, Kent H. and Padoch, Christine (eds.), Conservation of Neotropical forests: Working from traditional resource use. New York: Columbia University Press, 35–57.Google Scholar

Balée, William(1993). Indigenous transformation of Amazonian forests: An example from Maranhão, Brazil. In Descola, Philippe and Taylor, Anne C. (eds.), La remontée de l’Amazone: Anthropologie et histoire des sociétés amazoniennes, 231–254. Special ed. L’Homme 126–128, 33(2–4).Google Scholar

Balée, William(1999). Modes of production and ethnobotanical vocabulary: A controlled comparison of Guajá and Ka’apor. In Ted, L. Gragson and Blount, Ben (eds.), Ethnoecology: Knowledge, resources, and rights. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 24–40.Google Scholar

Balée, William(2000). Antiquity of traditional ethnobiological knowledge in Amazonia: The Tupi-Guarani family and time. Ethnohistory 47: 399–422.Google Scholar

Balée, William(2003). Historical-ecological influences on the word for cacao in Ka’apor. Anthropological Linguistics 45: 259–280.Google Scholar

Balée, William and Moore, Denny. (1994). Language, culture, and environment: Tupí-Guaraní plant names over time. In Roosevelt, Anna (ed.), Amazonian Indians from prehistory to the present: Anthropological perspectives. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 363–380.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1985). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter(1997). Prehistoric cultural explanations for widespread language families. In McConvell, Patrick and Evans, Nicholas (eds.), Archaeology and linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in global perspective. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 123–134.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter(2001). Early agriculturalist population diasporas? Farming, languages, and genes. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, Nurit. (1983). Wage-gathering: Socioeconomic change and the case of the Naiken of South India. In Robb, Peter (ed.), Rural South Asia: Linkages, changes, and development. London: Curzon Press, 57–90.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. (1976). A third palatal reflex in Polynesian languages. Journal of the Polynesian Society 85: 339–358.Google Scholar

Bolaños, Katherine. (2016). A descriptive grammar of Kakua, a language of Northwest Amazonia. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Bray, Warwick. (1977). From foraging to farming in early Mexico. In Megaw, J. V. S. (ed.), Hunters, gatherers and first farmers beyond Europe. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 225–250.Google Scholar

Brosius, J. Peter. (1991). Foraging in tropical rain forests: The case of the Penan of Sarawak, East Malaysia (Borneo). Human Ecology 19(2): 123–150.Google Scholar

Brücher, Heinz. (1989). Useful plants of Neotropical origin and their wild relatives. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Cabalzar, Aloisio and Ricardo, Carlos Alberto. (1998). Povos indígenas do Alto e Medio Rio Negro. São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental; São Gabriel da Cachoeira, AM: FOIRN – Federação das Organizações Indígenas do Rio Negro.Google Scholar

Cabrera, Gabriel, Franky, Carlos, and Mahecha, Dany. (1999). Los Nɨkak: Nómadas de la Amazonía Colombiana. Santafé de Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Fundación Gaia – Amazonas.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. (1997). American Indian languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chacon, Thiago. (2014). A revised proposal of Proto-Tukanoan consonants and Tukanoan family classification. International Journal of American Linguistics. 80(3): 275–322.Google Scholar

Chernela, Janet. (1993). The Wanano Indians of the Brazilian Amazon: A sense of space. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Clement, Charles R., Rival, Laura, and Cole, David M.. (2009). Domestication of peach-palm (Bactris gasipaes): The roles of human mobility and migration. In Alexiades, Miguel N. (ed.), Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia. New York: Berghahn Books, 117–140.Google Scholar

Colinvaux, Paul and Bush, Mark. (1991). The rain-forest ecosystem as a resource for hunting and gathering. American Anthropologist 93(1): 153–160.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. (2001). Principles of areal typology. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf, and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1456–1470.Google Scholar

Endicott, Kirk M. (1984). The economy of the Batek of Malaysia: Annual and historical perspectives. Research in Economic Anthropology 6: 26–52.Google Scholar

Endicott, Kirk M. and Bellwood, Peter. (1991). The possibility of independent foraging in the rain forest of peninsular Malaysia. Human Ecology 19: 151–185.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience. (2005). Areal diffusion and the development of evidentiality: Evidence from Hup. Studies in Language 29(3): 617–650.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience (2006). Growing a numeral system: The historical development of numerals in an Amazonian language family. Diachronica 23(2): 259–288.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience (2007). The Vaupés melting pot: Tukanoan influence on Hup. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology. Explorations in Linguistic Typology 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epps, Patience (2008a). Grammatical borrowing in Hup. In Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette (eds.), Grammatical borrowing: A cross-linguistic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience (2008b). A Grammar of Hup. Mouton Grammar Library 43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience (2014). Historical linguistics and socio-cultural reconstruction. In Bowern, Claire and Evans, Bethwyn (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. London: Routledge, 579–597.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience (2017). Subsistence pattern and contact-driven language change: A view from the Amazon basin. Language Dynamics and Change 7: 47–101.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience and Bolaños, Katherine. (2017). Reconsidering the ‘Makú’ family of northwest Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 83(3): 467–507.Google Scholar

Fisser, Anne. (1988). Wirtschaftliche und soziale Beziehungen zwischen den Tukano und Maku Nordwest-Amazoniens. Hohenschäftlarn: Klaus Renner Verlag.Google Scholar

Gardner, Peter. (1972). Paliyan social structure. In Damas, David (ed.), Contributions to anthropology: Band societies. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada, 153–171.Google Scholar

Garvan, John M. (1963). The Negritos of the Philippines. Horn-Wien: Verlag Ferdinand Berger.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. (1978). Generalizations about numeral systems. In Greenberg, Joseph, Ferguson, Charles A., and Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 3. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 249–295.Google Scholar

Grinker, Roy. (1994). Houses in the rainforest: Ethnicity and inequality among farmers and foragers in Central Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). (2005). The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas and Bailey, Robert. (1991). Introduction: Have hunter-gatherers ever lived in the tropical rainforest independently of agriculture? In Headland, Thomas and Bailey, Robert (eds.), Human foragers in tropical rain forests. New York: Plenum. Special issue of Human Ecology, 19(2): 115–122.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas, Bailey, Robert, and Reid, Lawrence. (1989). Hunter-gatherers and their neighbors from prehistory to present. Current Anthropology 30(1): 43–66.Google Scholar

Heckenberger, Michael. (2002). Rethinking the Arawakan diaspora. In Hill, Jonathan and Santos-Granero, Fernando (eds.), Comparative Arawakan histories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 99–122.Google Scholar

Huber, Randall and Reed, Robert. (1992). Vocabulário comparativo: Palabras selectas de lenguas indigenas de Colombia. Bogotá: SIL.Google Scholar

Jackson, Jean. (1983). The fish people: Linguistic exogamy and Tukanoan identity in northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Junker, Laura. (2002). Introduction: Southeast Asia. In Morrison, Kathleen and Junker, Laura (eds.), Forager-traders in South and Southeast Asia: Long-term histories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch-Grünberg, Theodore. (1906a). Die Indianner-Stämme am oberen Rio Negro und Yapurá und ihre sprachliche Zuhörigkeit. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 38: 167–205.Google Scholar

Koch-Grünberg, Theodore(1906b). Die Makú. Anthropos 1: 877–906.Google Scholar

Lathrap, Donald. (1968). The ‘hunting’ economies of the tropical forest zone of South America: An attempt at historical perspective. In Lee, Richard and Devore, Irven (eds.), Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine, 23–29.Google Scholar

Lee, Richard. (1979). The !Kung San: Men, women, and work in a foraging society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leonti, Marco, Sticher, Otto, and Heinrich, Michael. (2003). Antiquity of medicinal plant usage in two Macro-Mayan ethnic groups (México). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 88: 119–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levi-Strauss, Claude. (1968). The concept of ‘primitiveness’. In Lee, Richard and Devore, Irven (eds.), Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine, 349–352.Google Scholar

Maceda, Marcelino. (1964). The culture of the Mamanua. Manila: Catholic Trade School.Google Scholar

Martins, Silvana A. (2004). Fonologia e gramática Dâw. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Martins, Silvana A. and Martins, Valteir. (1999). Makú. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra (eds.), The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–268.Google Scholar

Martins, Valtier. (2005). Reconstrução fonológica do Protomaku Oriental. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Milton, Katherine. (1984). Protein and carbohydrate resources of the Maku Indians of northwestern Amazonia. American Anthropologist, 86: 7–27.Google Scholar

Morris, Brian. (1982). Forest-traders: A socio-economic study of the Hill Pandaram. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Neves, Eduardo G. (2001). Indigenous historical trajectories in the upper Rio Negro basin. In McEwan, Colin, Barreto, Cristiane, and Neves, Eduardo (eds.), Unknown Amazon: Culture and nature in Ancient Brazil. London: British Museum Press, 266–285.Google Scholar

Neves, Eduardo G. and Petersen, James. (2006). Political economy and Pre-Colombian landscape transformations. In Balée, William and Erickson, Clark L., Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical Lowlands. New York: Columbia University Press, 279–309.Google Scholar

Nimuendajú, Curt. (1927/1950). Reconhecimento dos rios Içana, Ayarí, e Uaupés: Relatório apresentado ao Serviço de Proteção aos Indios do Amazonas e Acre, 1927. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 39: 125–183 and 44: 149–178.Google Scholar

Nurse, George T., Weiner, J. S., and Jenkins, Trefor. (1985). The peoples of southern Africa and their affinities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ospina, Bozzi, Ana Maria. (2002). Les structures élémentaires du Yuhup Makú, langue de l’Amazonie Colombienne: Morphologie et syntaxe. PhD dissertation, Université Paris 7 – Denis Diderot.Google Scholar

Peterson, Jean Treloggen. (1978). Hunter-gatherer/farmer exchange. American Anthropologist 80: 335–351.Google Scholar

Piperno, Dolores and Pearsall, Deborah. (1998). The origins of agriculture in the lowland Neotropics. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Politis, Gustavo. (1996). Nukak. Colombia: Instituto Amazonico de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar

Politis, Gustavo(1999). Plant exploitation among the Nukak hunter-gatherers of Amazonia: Between ecology and ideology. In Gosden, Chris and Hather, John (eds.), The prehistory of food: Appetites for change. London: Routledge, 97–124.Google Scholar

Politis, Gustavo(2007). Nukak: Ethnoarchaeology of an Amazonian people, trans. Alberto, Benjamin. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar

Posey, Darrell. (1984). A preliminary report on diversified management of tropical rainforest by the Kayapó Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Advances in Economic Botany 1: 112–126.Google Scholar

Pozzobon, Jorge. (1991). Parenté et demographie chez les Indiens Maku. PhD dissertation, Université de Paris VII.Google Scholar

Pozzobon, Jorge(1994). Indios Por Opção. Porto e Virgula 17: 34–39. Porto Alegre, RS.Google Scholar

Price, T. Douglas and Gebauer, Anne B.. (1995). New perspectives on the transition to agriculture. In Douglas Price, T. and Gebauer, Anne B. (eds.), Last hunters – first farmers: New perspectives on the prehistoric transition to agriculture. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 3–20.fGoogle Scholar

Ramirez, Henri. (1997a). A fala Tukano dos Ye’pa-Masa, Vol. 1: Gramática. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia, CEDEM.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Henri(1997b). A Fala Tukano dos Ye’pa-Masa, Vol. 2: Dicionário. Inspetoria Salesiana Manaus: Missionária da Amazônia, CEDEM.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Henri(2001). Dicionário Baniwa-Português. Manaus: Editora da Universidade do Amazonas.Google Scholar

Ramos, Alcida Rita. (1980). Hierarquia e simbiose: Relações intertribais no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Hucitei.Google Scholar

Reid, Howard. (1979). Some aspects of movement, growth and change among the Hupdu Maku Indians of Brazil. PhD dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence. (1987). The early switch hypothesis: Linguistic evidence for contact between Negritos and Austronesians. Man and Culture in Oceania 3 (Special Issue): 41–60.Google Scholar

Renfrew, Colin. (1987). Archaeology and language. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Rival, Laura. (1999). Introductory essay on South American hunters-and-gatherers. In Lee, Richard and Daly, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–85.Google Scholar

Rival, Laura (2002). Trekking through history: The Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rival, Laura (2006). Amazonian historical ecologies. In Ellen, Roy (ed.), Ethnobiology and the science of humankind: A retrospective and a prospective. Special issue of JRAI, S79–S94.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna. (1986). Línguas Brasileiras: Para o conhecimento das línguas indígenas. São Paulo: Ed. Loyola.Google Scholar

Roosevelt, Anna C. (1998). Ancient and modern hunter-gatherers of lowland South America: An evolutionary problem. In Balée, William (ed.), Advances in historical ecology. New York: Columbia University Press, 190–212.Google Scholar

Roosevelt, Anna C.(1999). Archaeology of South American hunters and gatherers. In Lee, Richard and Daly, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86–91.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. (1949). Time perspective in aboriginal culture: A study in method. In Mandelbaum, David G. (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press, 389–467.Google Scholar

Schultz, Harald. (1959). Ligeiras notas sobre os Maku do Paraná Boá-Boá. Revista do Museu Paulista, n.s., v. XI: 129–131.Google Scholar

Seki, Lucy. (1999). The Upper Xingu as an incipient linguistic area. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra (eds.), The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 417–430.Google Scholar

Silverwood-Cope, Peter. (1972). A contribution to the ethnography of the Columbian Maku. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce D. (2001). Low-level food production. Journal of Archaeological Research 9: 1–43.Google Scholar

Solway, Jackie S., and Lee, Richard B.. (1990). Foragers, genuine or spurious? Current Anthropology 31: 109–146.Google Scholar

Sorensen, Arthur P. (1967). Multilingualism in the Northwest Amazon. American Anthropologist 69: 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spielmann, Katherine and Eder, James. (1994). Hunters and farmers: Then and now. Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 303–323.Google Scholar

Stampe, David. (1976). Cardinal number systems. Chicago Linguistic Society 12: 594–609.Google Scholar

Stenzel, Kristine. (2005). Multilingualism in the northwest Amazon, revisited. In Memorias del Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamérica-II. University of Texas at Austin. Available at www.ailla.utexas.org/site/cilla2_toc_sp.html.Google Scholar

Stradelli, Ermanno. (1890). L’Uaupés e gli Uaupés. Leggenda del Jurupary. Boll. Soc. Geogr., Series III 3, 659–689 and 798–835.Google Scholar

Turnbull, Colin. (1965). The Mbuti Pygmies of the Congo. In Gibbs, James L. Jr. (ed.), Peoples of Africa. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 281–317.Google Scholar

Weir, E. M. Helen. (1984). A negação e outros tópicos da gramática Nadëb. Master’s thesis, UNICAMP, Campinas.Google Scholar

Weir, Helen, Senn, Rodolfo, and Senn Martins, Beatrice. (1999). Dicionario Nadëb-Português, Português-Nadëb.Google Scholar

Wilmsen, Edwin N. and Denbow, James R.. (1990). Paradigmatic history of San-speaking peoples and current attempts at revisionism. Current Anthropology, 31: 489–524.Google Scholar

Winter, Werner. (1999). When numeral systems are expanded. In Gvozdanovic, Jadranka, ed. Numeral types and changes worldwide. Trends in Linguistics 118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 43–54.Google Scholar

Woodburn, James. (1988). African hunter-gatherer social organization: Is it best understood as a product of encapsulation? In Ingold, Tim, Riches, David, and Woodburn, James (eds.), Hunters and gatherers: History, evolution, and social change. New York: Berg Press, 31–64.Google Scholar

Wright, Robin. (2011). Arawakan flute cults of lowland South America: The domestication of predation and the production of agentivity. In Hill, Jonathan H. and Chaumeil, Jean-Pierre (eds.), Burst of breath: New research on indigenous ritual wind instruments in lowland South America. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 325–353.Google Scholar

Zent, Eglée and Zent, Stanford. (2004). Amazonian Indians as ecological disturbance agents: The Hoti of the Sierra de Maigualida, Venezuelan Guyana. In Carlson, T. J. S. and Maffi, Luisa (eds.), Ethnobotany and conservation of biological diversity. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden, 79–112.Google Scholar

Azara, Félix de. (1847). Descripción e historia del Paraguay y del Río de la Plata. Imprenta de Sánchez, calle de Jardines, número 36, Madrid. 2 vols.Google Scholar

Boggiani, Guido. (1900). Compendio de etnografía paraguaya moderna. Asunción: Revista del Instituto Paraguayo, Año 3, N°23/24.Google Scholar

Brinton, Daniel. (1898). The linguistic cartography of the Chaco region. Philadelphia: Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar

Braunstein, José. (1992). Presentación. Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, IV. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño, 1–8.Google Scholar

Braunstein, José, and Miller., Elmer (1999). Ethnohistorical introduction. In Miller, Elmer and Braunstein, José (eds.), Peoples of the Gran Chaco. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvei, 1–22.Google Scholar

Calandra, Horacio and Salceda, Susana. (2008). Cambio y continuidad en el Gran Chaco: De las historias étnicas a la prehistoria. In Braunstein, José and Meichtry, Norma (eds.), Liderazgo: Representatividad y control social en el Gran Chaco. EUDENE (Editorial Universitaria de la Universidad Nacional del Nordeste) Resistencia, 33–43.Google Scholar

Censabella, Marisa. (2002). Descripción funcional de un corpus en lengua toba. Sistema fonológico, clases sintácticas y derivación. Aspectos de sincronía dinámica. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar

Ceria, Verónica, and Sandalo., Filomena (1995). A preliminary reconstruction of Proto-Waikuruan with special reference to pronominals and demonstratives. Anthropological Linguistics 37(2): 169–191.Google Scholar

Citro, Silvia, Golluscio, Lucía, and Vidal., Alejandra (2006). The Chaco languages and the socio-historical dynamics of their people. Paper presented at the Conference Hunter-Gatherers in Historical Perspective. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar

Sardi, Chase, Miguel., (1972). La situación actual de los indígenas en el Paraguay. In Morner, M., (ed.), La situación del índigena en América del Sur. Montevideo: Editorial Tierra Nueva, 237–305.Google Scholar

de la Cruz, Luis María. (1991). La presencia nivaklé (chulupí) en el territorio formoseño. Contribución de la etnohistoria de Formosa. In Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, II. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño, 87–106.Google Scholar

Dell’Arciprete, Ana. (1991). Lugares de los pilagá. In Hacia una carta étnica del Gran Chaco II. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño, 9–19.Google Scholar

Dietrich, Wolfang. (1986). El idioma chiriguano: gramática, textos, vocabulario. Madrid: Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana.Google Scholar

Dietrich, Wolfang. (2006). Nuevos aspectos de la posición del conjunto chiriguano (Guaraní del Chaco boliviano) dentro de las lenguas Tupi-Guaraníes bolivianas. Paper presented at the 52nd International Congress of Americanists, Sevilla.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. (1997). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dominguez, Marcelo, Golluscio, Lucía & Gutierrez, Analía 2006 Los vilelas del Chaco: desestructuración cultural, invisibilización y estrategias identitarias. Indiana 23, 199–226.Google Scholar

Ducci, Fray Zacarías. (1904). Los Tobas y su lengua. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, Tomo XXII. Buenos Aires: Instituto Geográfico Argentino.Google Scholar

Ducci, Fray Zacarías.(1905/6). Vocabulario toba-castellano. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, Tomo XXIII. Buenos Aires: Instituto Geográfico Argentino.Google Scholar

Fabre, Alain. (1998). Manual de las lenguas indígenas sudamericanas. Lincom Europa. München-Newcastle. 2 vols.Google Scholar

Fabre, Alain. (2007). Morfosintaxis de los clasificadores posesivos en las lenguas del Gran Chaco. Revista de Lenguas Indígenas y Universos Culturales 4: 67–85.Google Scholar

Frenguelli, Joaquín (1943). Las grandes unidades físicas del territorio argentino. Geografía de la República Argentina. GAEA, V, III. Buenos Aires: Sociedad Geográfica de la República Argentina.Google Scholar

Furlong Cardiff, Guillermo. (1939). Entre los vilelas de Salta. Buenos Aires: Academia Literaria del Plata.Google Scholar

Gerzenstein, Ana. (1978). Lengua chorote I. Archivo de Lenguas Precolombinas. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Gerzenstein, Ana. (1979). Lengua chorote II. Vocabulario. Archivo de Lenguas Precolombinas. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística de la Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Gerzenstein, Ana. (1983). Lengua chorote. Variedad número 2. Archivo de Lenguas Precolombinas. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Gerzenstein, Ana. (1994). Lengua Maká. Estudio descriptivo. Colección Nuestra América, Serie Archivo de Lenguas Indoamericanas. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Gerzenstein, Ana. (1999). Diccionario Etnolingüístico Maká-Español (DELME). Colección Nuestra América. Serie Archivo de Lenguas Indoamericanas. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Golluscio, Lucía. (2007). Vilela (Chaco, South America): A typological overview with special emphasis on deictics. Colloquium presented at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Golluscio, Lucía, and Hirsch, Silvia. (2006). Historias fragmentadas, identidades y lenguas: Los pueblos indígenas del Chaco Argentino. Indiana 23: 99–102.Google Scholar

González, Hebe. (2005). Tapiete grammar. PhD dissertation. Department of Linguistics. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. (1959). Linguistic classification of South America. In Steward, J. and Faron, L. (eds.), Native peoples of South America. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Grondona, Verónica. (1998). A grammar of Mocoví. PhD dissertation. Department of Linguistics. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Grubb, W. Barbrooke. (1914). A church in the wilds. London: Seeley, Service & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar

Gualdieri, Beatriz. (1998). Mocoví (Guaycuruan). Fonologia e morfossintaxe. PhD dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, Analía. (2015). Evidential Determiners in Nivacle. Anthropological Linguistics 57 (4): 412–443.Google Scholar

Hervás y Panduro, L. (1787[1990]). Vocabulario Poligloto. Saggio Pratico delle lingue Manuel With introduction and facsímile edition by Manuel Breva-Claramonte and Ramón Sarmiento. Madrid: Socieded General Española de Librería.Google Scholar

Hunt, Richard J. (1913). El Vejoz. Buenos Aires: Coni Hermanos.Google Scholar

Karsten, Rafael. (1932). The Indian tribes of the Argentine and Bolivian Chaco. Ethnological Studies. Societas Scientarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Lítterarum, 4.1. Helsingfors, Finland.Google Scholar

Klein, Harriet M. (1973). A grammar of Argentine Toba. PhD dissertation, Columbia University. Klein, Harriet M., and Braunstein., José (2003). Contacts and language intermixing among Chaco indigenous populations. Paper presented at LSA Annual Meeting.Google Scholar

Koch-Grünberg, Theodor. (1903). Die Guaycuruan gruppe. Mitt. Anthrop. Gesell., Vol. 33; Vienna.Google Scholar

Lehmann-Nitsche, Robert. (1907). Estudios antropológicos sobre los chiriguanos, chorotes, matacos y tobas (Chaco Occidental). Anales del Museo de la Plata I 2: 53–151.Google Scholar

Lafone-Quevedo, Samuel A. (1894). Los Lules. Boletin del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, 185–245, Tomo XV. Mayo, Junio, Julio y Agosto.Google Scholar

Lafone-Quevedo, Samuel A.(1895). La lengua vilela o chulupí. Estudio de filología chaco-argentina fundado sobre los trabajos de Hervás, Adelung y Pellschi. Boletin del Instituto Geográfico Argentino 16: 37–124.Google Scholar

Lafone-Quevedo, Samuel A. (1912). Pronominal classification of certain South American Indian stocks. Buenos Aires: Coni Hermanos.Google Scholar

Lanning, Edward. (1967). Perú before the Incas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Machoni de Cerdeña, P. Antonio. (1877). Arte de la lengua Lule y Tonocoté. Buenos Aires: Coni Hermanos.Google Scholar

Massei, Inocencio Or. Seráfica. (1895). “Pater noster” and notes. Nocten dialect with an introduction and notes by S. A. Lafone Quevedo Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, Tomo XVI. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Mendoza, Marcela. (2004). Culture, Demic expansions, and bilateral kinship in the South American Gran Chaco: A response to Doug Jones. American Anthropologist 106: 212–213.Google Scholar

Messineo, Cristina. (1988). Variantes dialectales del complejo lingüístico Toba. Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, II, 13–22. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño.Google Scholar

Messineo, Cristina. (1992). Variantes diatópicas del toba. In Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, V, 67–79. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño.Google Scholar

Messineo, Cristina. (2003). Lengua toba (Guaycuruan).Aspectos gramaticales y discursivos. Lincom Europa Academia Publications.Google Scholar

Messineo, Cristina, and Braunstein., José (1990). Variantes lingüísticas del Mataco. Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, I. Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño. Las Lomitas.Google Scholar

Métraux, Alfred. (1996[1946]). Etnografía del Chaco. Asunción: Centro de Estudios Antropológicos de la Universidad Católica.Google Scholar

Morresi, Eldo S. (1971). Las Ruinas del km. 75 y Concepción del Bermejo – Primera etapa de una Investigación de arqueología histórica regional. Resistencia: Departamento de Publicaciones e Impresiones de la Universidad Nacional del Nordeste.Google Scholar

Neel, J. V. and Salzano., F. M. (1967). Further studies on the Xavante Indians. X. Some hypotheses-generalizations resulting from these studies. American Journal of Human Genetics 19(4): 554–574.Google Scholar

Nercesian, Verónica (2014). Wichi Lhomtes. Estudio de la gramática y la interacción fonología-morfología-sintaxis-semántica. Muenchen: Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 74.Google Scholar

Nordenskiöld, Erland. (1912). Indianerleben. El Gran Chaco (Südamerika), Leipzig.Google Scholar

Orbigny, Alcide D’. (1839). L’Homme Américain, Paris.Google Scholar

Palmer, John. (2005). Wichi toponimy Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, VI, 3–63. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño.Google Scholar

Pelleschi, Giovanni. (1886). Eight months on the Gran Chaco of the Argentine Republic. London: Gilbert and Rivington.Google Scholar

Pelleschi, Giovanni. (1897). Los indios mataguayos y su lengua Introduction by Samuel. A. Lafone Quevedo. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, XVII/XVIII. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Remedi, Joaquín Ord. Seráf. (1890). Los indios matacos y su lengua. With vocabulary organized by S.A. Lafone Quevedo Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, Separate edition. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Sandalo, Filomena. (1995). A grammar of Kadiwéu. PhD dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Max. (1936). Los Maká en comparación con los Enimagá antiguos. Revista de la Sociedad Científica del Paraguay III(6): 152–157.Google Scholar

Seeelwische, José. (1980). Diccionario nivaclé-castellano. Mariscal Estigarribia: Biblioteca Paraguaya de Antropología.Google Scholar

Serrano, Antonio. (1972). Líneas fundamentales de la arqueología del litoral. Instituto de Antropología. Vol. XXXII. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Google Scholar

Stell, Nélida. (1972). Fonología de la lengua axluxlai. Cuadernos de Lingüística Indígena 8. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Stell, Nélida. (1989). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua niwaclé (chulupí). Tesis doctoral. Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Sušnik, Branislava. (1986/87). Los Aborígenes del Paraguay, VII/1, Lenguas Chaqueñas. Asunción, Paraguay: Museo Etnográfico Andrés Barbero.Google Scholar

Sušnik, Branislava. (1972). Dimensiones migratorias y pautas culturales de los pueblos del Gran Chaco y de su periferia. Enfoque etnológico. Instituto de Historia. Facultad de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste.Google Scholar

Sušnik, Branislava. (1988). Etnohistoria del Paraguay. Etnohistoria de los chaqueños y de los guaraníes. Bosquejo sintético. Suplemento Antropológico 23(2).Google Scholar

Tapia, Augusto. (1936). “Pilcomayo. Contribución al conocimiento de las llanuras argentinas.” Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Agricultura de la Nación, Dirección de Minas y Geología.Google Scholar

Tovar, Antonio. (1951). Un capítulo de lingüística general. Los prefijos posesivos en lenguas del Chaco y la lucha entre préstamo morfológicos en un espacio dado. Boletín de la Academia Argentina de Letras 20: 360–403.Google Scholar

Tovar, Antonio. (1964). El grupo mataco y su relación con otras lenguas de América del Sur. Actas del 35°Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, tomo II, 439–452. México.Google Scholar

Unruh, Ernesto; Kalisch, Hannes. (2003). Enlhet-Enenlhet. Una familia lingüística chaqueña. Thule, Rivista italiana di studi americanistici 14/15: 207–231.Google Scholar

Vidal, Alejandra. (1997). Noun classification in Pilagá. The Journal of Amazonian Languages 1(1): 58–111.Google Scholar

Vidal, Alejandra (2001). Pilagá grammar. PhD dissertation. Department of Linguistics. University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Vidal, Alejandra. (2005). Fieldnotes on Wichí (southern and central Bermejo, Formosa). DoBeS Project. “Endangered Languages, endangered peoples of Argentina.” Universidad de Buenos Aires-Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar

Vidal, Alejandra, and Gutierrez, Analia. (2010). La categoría de tiempo nominal en las lenguas chaqueñas. In Castel, Victor and de Severino, Liliana C. (eds.), La renovación de la palabra en el bicentenario de la Argentina. Los colores de la mirada linguistica. Mendoza: Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 1347–1355.Google Scholar

Viegas Barros, Pedro. (1993). ¿Existe una relación genética entre las lenguas mataguayas y guaycurúes? In Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, V. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño, 193–213.Google Scholar

Urquiza, Viñas, Teresa., María (1974). Lengua Mataca. Archivo de Lenguas Precolombinas. Centro de Estudios lingüísticos, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires, 2 vols.Google Scholar

Wright, Pablo. (1988). Topónimos Tacaaglé. In Hacia una nueva carta étnica del Gran Chaco, V. Las Lomitas: Centro del Hombre Antiguo Chaqueño, 193–213.Google Scholar