Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T21:44:03.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Hunting for Women, Haunted by Gender: The Rhetorical Limits of theManifesto

from Part II - Political Reception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Terrell Carver
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
James Farr
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albistur, Maite, and Armogathe, Daniel. 1977. Histoire du féminisme français: de l’empire napolónien à nos jours. Paris: Éditions des Femmes.Google Scholar
Barrow, Margaret. 2003. “British Women’s Temperance League.” In Alcohol and Temperance in Modern History: An International Encyclopedia, eds. Blocker, Jack S., Fahey, David M., and Tyrrell, Ian R.. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 114116.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine. 2002. “What Difference Did Women’s Work Make to the Industrial Revolution?” In The European Women’s History Reader, eds. Montgomery, Fiona and Collette, Christine. London: Routledge, 100105.Google Scholar
Bernheimer, Charles. 1989. Figures of Ill Repute: Representing Prostitution in Nineteenth-Century France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, David. 2004. Helen Macfarlane: A Feminist, Revolutionary Journalist, and Philosopher in Mid-Nineteenth-Century England. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Boussy, Maite, and Fauré, Christine. 2003. “1848 in Paris.” In Political and Historical Encyclopedia of Women, ed. Fauré, Christine. English eds. London: Routledge, 294317.Google Scholar
Brock, Gillian. 1988. Necessary Goods: Our Responsibilities to Meet Others’ Needs. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brown, Heather. 2012. Marx on Gender and the Family: A Critical Study. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1988. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell. 1998. The Postmodern Marx. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Encyclopedia, Catholic. 2014 [1907–1912]. Communism. www.catholic.org/encyclopedia/view.php?id=3209. (Accessed August 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Cohen, Margaret. 1991. “‘The Most Suffering Class’: Gender, Class, and Consciousness in Pre-Marxist France.” Boundary 18(2): 2246.Google Scholar
DeGroat, Judith A. 2002. “The Public Nature of Women’s Work: Definitions and Debates during the Revolution of 1848.” In The European Women’s History Reader, eds. Montgomery, Fiona and Collette, Christine. London: Routledge, 124128.Google Scholar
DiStefano, Christine. 1991. Configurations of Masculinity: A Feminist Perspective on Modern Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah R. 1978. Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Fauré, Christine. 2002. “Rights or Virtues: Women and the Republic.” In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage, eds. van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 125137.Google Scholar
Gane, Mike. 1998. “The Communist Manifesto’s Transgendered Proletarians.” In The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations, ed. Cowling, Mark. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 132141.Google Scholar
Hale, Sarah Josepha Buell. 1853. Woman’s Record; or Sketches of All Distinguished Women, from “The Beginning” till A.D. 1850. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, Susan, Santos, Christina, Sevilla, Almudena, and Sofer, Catherine. 2013. “Sharing of Resources Within the Family and the Economics of Household Decision Making.” Journal of Marriage 75(3): 625639.Google Scholar
Honeyman, Katrina, and Goodman, Jordan. 2002. “Women’s Work, Gender Conflict, and Labour Markets in Europe, 1500–1900.” In The European Women’s History Reader, eds.Montgomery, Fiona and Collette, Christine. London: Routledge, 7999.Google Scholar
Hunt, Tristram. 2010. “Introduction.” In Engels, Friedrich, The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. New York: Penguin, 330.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1988. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lacquer, Thomas. 1992. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, David. 2007. The Young Karl Marx: German Philosophy, Modern Politics, and Human Flourishing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLellan, David. 1973. Karl Marx: His Life and Thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet. 1966. “Women: The Longest Revolution.” New Left Review. 40: 1137.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet. 1973. Woman’s Estate. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Mort, Frank. 2002. Dangerous Sexualities: Medico-Moral Politics in England since 1830. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moses, Claire G. 1984. French Feminism in the 19th Century. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Plaut, Eric A., and Anderson, Kevin. 1999. Marx on Suicide. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Plumley, Ryan. (2003) “Feuerbach and Gender: The Logic of Complementarity.” History of European Ideas. 29(1): 85105.Google Scholar
Raddatz, Fritz J. 1979. Karl Marx, A Political Biography. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. 1987. The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rowbotham, Sheila. 1972. Women, Resistance, Revolution: A History of Women and Revolution in the Modern World. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Rowbotham, Sheila. 1998. “Dear Dr Marx: A Letter from a Socialist Feminist.” In Socialist Register 1998: The Communist Manifesto Now, eds. Panitch, Leo and Leys, Colin. New York: Monthly Review Press, 117.Google Scholar
Rubel, Maximilien. 1946a. Flora Tristan et Karl Marx. London: Internationale echo; Ideen en gebeurtenissen uit alle landen.Google Scholar
Rubel, Maximilien. 1946b. “Flora Tristan et Karl Marx.” La Nef: Revue Mensuelle. 14: 7176.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower. 1983. “Utopia and the Family: A Note on the Family in Political Thought.” In Dissent and Affirmation: Essays in Honor of Mulford Q. Sibley, eds. Kalleberg, Arthur L., Moon, J. Donald, and Sabia, Daniel R.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 106117.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. 1994. A Rhetoric of Bourgeois Revolution: The Abbé Sieyes and What is the Third Estate? Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Jonathan. 2013. Karl Marx: A Nineteenth-Century Life. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Strumingher, Laura S. 1988. The Odyssey of Flora Tristan. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
The Union. 2001a. “Employment of Females in Mines, May 1842.” In Women and Radicalism in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Sanders, Mike. New York: Routledge, 501506.Google Scholar
The Union. 2001b. “The Women of the Working Classes, January 1843.” In Women and Radicalism in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Sanders, Mike. New York: Routledge, 525540.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ann. 2008. Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tristan, Flora. 2007. The Workers’ Union. Bloomington, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Lise. 1983. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Whitney. 1994. “Writing the 1848 Revolution: Politics, Gender, and Feminism in the Works of French Women of Letters.” Society for French Historical Studies. 18(4): 10011024.Google Scholar
Weikart, Richard. 1994. “Marx, Engels, and the Abolition of the Family.” History of European Ideas. 18(5): 657672.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×