Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- 26 Reading the Contested Forms of Nation through the Contested Forms of Kinship and Marriage
- 27 The Prison as a Technology of Care in Northeast Brazil
- 28 The Interface between Kinship and Politics in Three Different Social Settings
- 29 A Global Family: Kinship, Nations, and Transnational Organizations in Botswana’s Time of AIDS
- 30 Kinship, World Religions, and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
26 - Reading the Contested Forms of Nation through the Contested Forms of Kinship and Marriage
from Part VI - Kinship and the Nation-State
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- 26 Reading the Contested Forms of Nation through the Contested Forms of Kinship and Marriage
- 27 The Prison as a Technology of Care in Northeast Brazil
- 28 The Interface between Kinship and Politics in Three Different Social Settings
- 29 A Global Family: Kinship, Nations, and Transnational Organizations in Botswana’s Time of AIDS
- 30 Kinship, World Religions, and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 605 - 628Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alidina, Rizwan and Walji, Mohamed. 17 Sept. 2010. “Cousin Marriages: A Question of Understanding.” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/sep/17/cousin-marriages-understanding-health-risks, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Beckford, Martin. 23 Mar. 2010. “Baroness Deech: Risks of Cousin Marriage Not Discussed for Fear of Offending Muslims.” The Telegraph. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/7497906/Baroness-Deech-Risks-of-cousin-marriage-not-discussed-for-fear-of-offending-Muslims.html, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Bemiss, Samuel Merrifield. 1857. “On Marriages of Consanguinity.” Journal of Psychological Medicine and Mental Pathology 10: 369–379.Google ScholarPubMed
Bemiss, Samuel Merrifield. 1858. “Report on the Influence of Marriages of Consanguinity upon Offspring.” Transactions of the American Medical Association 11: 319–425.Google Scholar
Bennett, Robin L, Motulsky, Arno G., Bittles, Alan, Hudgins, Louanne, et al. 2002. “Genetic Couselling and Screening of Consanguineous Couples and Their Offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 11(2): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredbenner, Candice Lewis. 1998. A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Charles, Rev. 1856. “Laws of Reproduction, Considered with Particular Reference to the Intermarriage of First-Cousins.” Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 236–246.Google Scholar
Butt, Riazat. 15 Nov. 2005. “British Pakistanis Should Stop Marrying Cousins, Says MP.” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/nov/16/immigrationpolicy.politics, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Charles. 1834. Thoughts on Physical Education: Being a Discourse Delivered to a Convention of Teachers in Lexington, KY., on the 6th and 7th of Nov., 1833. Boston, MA: Marsh, Capen and Lyon.Google Scholar
Cooke, Miriam. 2014. Tribal Modern: Branding New Nations in the Arab Gulf. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 2000. Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, Whitney R. 1950. The Burned-Over District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New York, 1800–1850. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crossman, Edward. 1861. “On Intermarriage of Relations As a Cause of Degeneracy of Offspring.” British Medical Journal 1: 401–402.Google Scholar
Delaney, Carol. 1995. “Father State, Motherland, and the Birth of Modern Turkey.” In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol, 177–200. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dolgin, Janet L. 1997. Defining the Family: Law, Technology, and Reproduction in an Uneasy Age. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Driscoll, Margarette. 17 Feb. 2008. “It’s Tradition, Not Religion, That Wrecks So Many Lives.” The Sunday Times. www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1972391/posts, accessed August 8, 2015.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Lawrence. 1991. Women, Family, and Utopia: Communal Experiments of the Shakers, the Oneida Community, and the Mormons. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Gadher, Dipesh, Morgan, Christopher and Oliver, Jonathan. 10 Feb. 2008. “Minister Warns of ‘Inbred’ Muslims.” The Sunday Times. www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/Test/politics/article80421.ece, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Gibb, Frances. 20 Mar. 2010. “Rise in Marriages between Cousins ‘Is Putting Children’s Health at Risk.’” The Times. www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article7069255.ece, accessed February 13, 2011.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sarah Barringer. 2002. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael. 1985. Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard. 1988. Nationalism and the Politics of Culture in Quebec. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Heng, Geraldine and Devan, Janadas. 1992. “State Fatherhood: The Politics of Nationalism, Sexuality, and Race in Singapore.” In Nationalisms and Sexualities, ed. Parker, Andres, Russo, Mary, Sommer, Doris and Yaeger, Patricia, 343–364. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herb, Michael. 1999. All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2001. “Fraternity and Endogamy: The House of Rothschild.” Social Anthropology 9(3): 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2002. “Incest, Cousin Marriage, and the Origin of the Human Sciences in Nineteenth-Century England.” Past and Present 174: 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2009. Incest and Influence: The Private Life of Bourgeois England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1993. “Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism and the Family.” Feminist Review 44: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. 2001. “The Economies of Kinship and the Paternity of Culture: Origin Stories in Kinship Theory.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 277–301. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. 2013. “Kinship within and beyond the ‘Movement of Progressive Societies.’” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 39–62. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella. 2013. “The Difference Kinship Makes.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 3–38. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society; or, Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon. 2007 “Kinship in Europe: A New Approach to Long-Term Development.” In Kinship in Europe: Approaches to Long-Term Development (1300–1900), ed. Sabean, David Warren, Teuscher, Simon and Mathieu, Jon, 1–32. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Santorum, Rick. 2005. It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2004. Modern Clan Politics: The Power of “Blood” in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1969. “Kinship, Nationality and Religion in American Culture: Toward a Definition of Kinship.” In Forms of Symbolic Action (Proceedings of the 1969 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society), 116–125. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Alison. 2001. “Kinship, Cultural Preference and Immigration: Consanguineous Marriage among British Pakistanis.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(2): 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Alison. 2006. “Rishtas: Adding Emotion to Strategy in Understanding British Pakistani Transnational Marriages.” Global Networks 6(4): 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Alison. 2009. Negotiating Risk: British Pakistani Experiences of Genetics. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Andrew. 11 Feb. 2008. “Backing for Minister over First-Cousin Marriage Comments.” The Guardian. www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/feb11/religion.medicalscience, accessed November 8, 2010.Google Scholar
Steger, F. E. H. 1855. “Hereditary Transmission of Disease.” Nashville Journal of Medicine and Surgery 8(3): 177–191.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol. 1995. “Naturalizing Power.” In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol, 1–22. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar