Heidegger, Martin. 2014. Überlegungen A, B, C. Gesamtausgabe Vols. 94–6. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2010. Logic: The Question of Truth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2009a. Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2009b. Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2008a. Basic Concepts of Ancient Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2008b. Towards the Definition of Philosophy: With a Transcript of the Lecture-Course “On the Nature of the University and Academic Study.” London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2007. Becoming Heidegger: On the Trail of his Early Occasional Writings, 1910–1927. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2005a. Phänomenologische Interpretation ausgewählter Abhandlungen des Aristoteles zu Ontologie und Logik. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 62. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2005b. Seminare. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 15. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2004a. Der Begriff der Zeit. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 64. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2004b. The Phenomenology of Religious Life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2003a. The End of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2003b. Holzwege. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 5. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2002a. Identity and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2002b. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2002c. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2002d. The Essence of Truth. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2001a. Einleitung in die Philosophie. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 27. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2001b. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2001c. Sein und Wehrheit. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 36/37. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 2000. Introduction to Metaphysics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1998a. Logik Als Die Frage Nach Dem Wesen Der Sprache. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 38. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1998b. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1997a. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1997b. Nietzsche II. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 6.2. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1997c. Plato’s Sophist. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1995a. Aristotle’s Metaphysics θ 1–3. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1995b. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1995c. Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 21. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1995d. Phänomenologie Des Religiösen Lebens. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 60. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1994a. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 61. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1994b. Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 20. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1993. Basic Writings, revised and expanded edition. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1992. Platon: Sophistes. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 19. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1991a. Kant Und Das Problem Der Metaphysik. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. Bd. 3. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1991b. “Only a God Can Save Us: Der Spiegel’s Interview with Martin Heidegger (1966).” In The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, ed. Richard Wolin, 91–116. Cambridge, MD: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1991c. The Principle of Reason. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1989. Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis). Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 65. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1988a. Ontologie—Hermeneutik der Faktizität. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 63. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1988b. Schelling, Vom Wesen Der Menschlichen Freiheit. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 42. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1987. Zur Bestimmung Der Philosophie: Mit Einer Nachschrift Der Vorlesung “über Das Wesen Der Universität Und Des Akademischen Studiums.” Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 56/57. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1985a. Schelling’s Treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1985b. Unterwegs Zur Sprache. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 12. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1984. Die Frage nach dem Ding. Vol. Bd. 41. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1983a. Die Grundbegriffe Der Metaphysik: Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 29/30. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1983b. Einführung in die Metaphysik. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 40. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1982a. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1982b. Gelassenheit. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1982c. Identität und Differenz. Pfullingen: G. Neske.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1982d. Nietzsche. Volume 4, Nihilism. Translated by Frank A. Capuzzi. Edited by David Farrell Krell. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1982e. On the Way to Language. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1981. Grundbegriffe. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. Bd. 51. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1976. Wegmarken. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. Bd. 9. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1975a. Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Gesamtausgabe Vol. Bd. 24. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1975b. Was ist Metaphysik? Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1969a. Discourse on Thinking. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1969b. The Essence of Reasons. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1969c. Zur Sache des Denkens. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1968. What Is Called Thinking? New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1967a. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1967b. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1967c. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1966. Einführung in die Metaphysik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin 1934. Die Selbstbehauptung der Deutschen Universität. Breslau: Verlag Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn.Google Scholar

Abbey, Ruth. 2000. Charles Taylor. UK: Princeton University Press and Acumen Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. 2003. The Jargon of Authenticity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Al Ahmad, Jalal. 1982. Weststruckness = Gharbzadegi. Lexington, KY: Mazda.Google Scholar

Altman, William. 2012. Martin Heidegger and the First World War: Being and Time as Funeral Oration. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar

Altwegg, Jürg. 1988. Die Heidegger Kontroverse. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar

Anders, Günther, Oberschlick, Gerhard, and Reimann, Werner. 2001. Über Heidegger. München: Beck.Google Scholar

André, Jean-Edouard. 2006. Heidegger et la Politique: L’épreuve de la Liberté. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar

André, Jean-Edouard 2001. Heidegger et la Liberté: le Projet Politique de “Sein und Zeit.” Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Angus, Ian H. 1987. George Grant’s Platonic Rejoinder to Heidegger: Contemporary Political Philosophy and the Question of Technology. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 1978. “Martin Heidegger at Eighty.” In Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, ed. Murray, Michael, 293–303. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bambach, Charles R. 2003. Heidegger’s Roots: Nietzsche, National Socialism and the Greeks. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Bambach, Charles R. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barash, Jeffrey Andrew. 2003. Martin Heidegger and the Problem of Historical Meaning. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C. 2008. German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, Robert. 2000. “Heidegger’s Alleged Challenge to Nazi Concepts of Race.” In Appropriating Heidegger, eds. Faulconer, James E., Wrathall, Mark, 50–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernasconi, Robert 1993. Heidegger in Question: The Art of Existing. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Biemel, Walter. 1950. Le Concept de Monde Chez Heidegger. Louvain, Belgium: E. Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar

Blattner, William D. 2006. Heidegger’s Being and Time: A Reader’s Guide. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Blattner, William D. 2005. “Temporality.” In A Companion to Heidegger, eds. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark A., 311–24. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blattner, William D. 1999. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blitz, Mark. 2000. “Heidegger and the Political.” Political Theory 28(2): 167–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blitz, Mark 1981. Heidegger’s Being and Time and the Possibility of Political Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Boroujerdi, Mehrzad. 1996. Iranian Intellectuals and the West: The Tormented Triumph of Nativism. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brague, Rémi. 1988. Aristote et la Question du Monde: Essai sur le Contexte Cosmologique et Anthropologique de l’Ontologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. 1992. “Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time.” In Heidegger: A Critical Reader, eds. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Harrison Hall, 45–64. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert 1983. “Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time.” Monist 66 (3): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brogan, Walter. 2005. Heidegger and Aristotle: The Twofoldness of Being. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckley, R. Philip. 1992. Husserl, Heidegger, and the Crisis of Philosophical Responsibility. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burch, Matthew. 2010. “Death and Deliberation: Overcoming the Decisionism Critique of Heidegger’s Practical Philosophy.” Inquiry 53 (3): 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capobianco, Richard. 2010. Engaging Heidegger. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caputo, John D. 1993. Demythologizing Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Carman, Taylor. 2010. “Heidegger’s Anti-neo-Kantianism.” Philosophical Forum 41 (1): 131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carman, Taylor 2003. Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carman, Taylor 2000. “Must We Be Inauthentic?” In Heidegger, Authenticity and Modernity: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume 1, eds. Wrathall, Mark and Malpas, Jeff, 13–28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carman, Taylor 1994. “On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson.” Inquiry 37 (2): 203–23.Google Scholar

Ceasar, James. 2000. Reconstructing America: The Symbol of America in Modern Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chacon, Rodrigo. 2009. “Reading Strauss from the Start: On the Heideggerian Origins of ‘Political Philosophy.’” European Journal of Political Theory 9 (3): 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, Jeffrey. 2012. Infinite Autonomy: The Divided Individual in the Political Thought of G. W. F. Hegel and Friedrich Nietzsche. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Cosgrove, Joseph K. 2008. “Husserl, Jacob Klein, and Symbolic Nature.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 29 (1): 227–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Critchley, Simon. 2008. On Heidegger’s Being and Time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crowe, Benjamin D. 2006. Heidegger’s Religious Origins: Destruction and Authenticity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Crowell, Steven. 2008. “Measure-Taking: Meaning and Normativity in Heidegger’s Philosophy.” Continental Philosophy Review 41 (3): 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven Galt. 2001. Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cumming, Robert Denoon. 2001a. Phenomenology and Deconstruction: Breakdown in Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cumming, Robert Denoon 2001b. Phenomenology and Deconstruction: Solitude. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cumming, Robert Denoon 1991. Phenomenology and Deconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2001. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel O 1994. “Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications.” Review of Metaphysics 47 (4): 775–95.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred R. 2010. The Promise of Democracy: Political Agency and Transformation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred R. 1993. The Other Heidegger (Contestations). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred R. 1991. Life-world, Modernity, and Critique: Paths Between Heidegger and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred R. 1985. Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred R. 1984. “Ontology of Freedom: Heidegger and Political Philosophy.” Political Theory: 204–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Michael. 1999. The Autobiography of Philosophy: Rousseau’s The Reveries of the Solitary Walker. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

de Beistegui, Miguel. 2005. The New Heidegger. London. Continuum Press.Google Scholar

de Beistegui, Miguel 1998. Heidegger and the Political. New York. Routledge.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1989. Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question. Translated by Peter Collier. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devall, Bill, and Sessions, George. 1985. Deep Ecology. Salt Lake City, UT: G. M. Smith. Reprinted 2001, Layton, UT: Gibbs Smith.Google Scholar

Dodd, James. 2009. Violence and Phenomenology. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dostal, Robert J. 1994. “The Public and the People: Heidegger’s Illiberal Politics.” Review of Metaphysics 47 (3): 517–55.Google Scholar

Dostal, Robert J. 1992. “Friendship and Politics: Heidegger’s Failing.” Political Theory 20 (3): 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dostal, Robert J. 1987. “The World Is Never Lost: The Hermeneutics of Trust.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (3): 413–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dostal, Robert J. 1982. “The Problem of Indifferenz in Sein und Zeit.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2000. “Responses.” In Heidegger, Authenticity and Modernity: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume 1, eds. Wrathall, Mark and Malpas, Jeff, 305–42. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1993. “Heidegger on the Connection Between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, edited by Guignon, Charles, 289–316. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Wrathall, Mark A.. 2002. Heidegger Reexamined. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dugin, Alexander. 2012. The Fourth Political Theory. London: Arktos Media.Google Scholar

Dungey, Nicholas. 2007. “The Ethics and Politics of Dwelling.” Polity 39 (2): 234–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebeling, Hans. 1991. Martin Heidegger: Philosophie und Ideologie. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar

Ebeling, Hans 1990. Heidegger: Geschichte Einer Täuschung. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Edler, Frank. 1993. “Heidegger’s Interpretation of the German ‘Revolution.’” Research in Phenomenology 23 (1): 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edler, Frank 1990. “Philosophy, Language, and Politics: Heidegger’s Attempt to Steal the Language of the Revolution in 1933–34.” Social Research 57 (1): 197–238.Google Scholar

Ehrmantraut, Michael. 2010. Heidegger’s Philosophic Pedagogy. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Elkholy, Sharin N. 2008. Heidegger and a Metaphysics of Feeling: Angst and the Finitude of Being. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Farber, Marvin. 1967. The Foundation of Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl and the Quest for a Rigorous Science of Philosophy. New York: Paine-Whitman.Google Scholar

Farías, Víctor. 2010. Heidegger y su Herencia: los Neonazis, el Neofascismo Europeo y el Fundamentalismo Islámico. Madrid: Tecnos.Google Scholar

Farías, Víctor 1989. Heidegger and Nazism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Faye, Emmanuel. 2012. “Being, History, Technology, and Extermination in the Work of Heidegger.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1): 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faye, Emmanuel 2011. “From Polemos to Extermination of the Enemy.” Philosophy Today 55 (3): 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faye, Emmanuel 2009. Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933–1935. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Faye, Emmanuel 2005. L’introduction du Nazisme dans la Philosophie: Autour des Séminaires Inédits de 1933–1935. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

Fédier, François. 2008. Martin Heidegger, Le Temps, Le Monde. Paris: Lettrage.Google Scholar

Feldman, Matthew. 2005. “Between Geist and Zeitgeist: Martin Heidegger as Ideologue of ‘Metapolitical Fascism’.” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 6 (2): 175–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferry, Luc, and Renaut, Alain. 1990. Heidegger and Modernity. Translated by Franklin Philip. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Figal, Gunter. 2009. The Heidegger Reader. Bloomington. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Figal, Gunter 2007. Martin Heidegger zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.Google Scholar

Figal, Gunter 2005. “Being-with, Dasein-with, and the ‘They’ as the Basic Concept of Unfreedom, from Martin Heidegger: Phänomenologie der Freiheit.” In Heidegger’s Being and Time: Critical Essays, ed. Richard Polt, 105–16. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Figal, Gunter 2000. Martin Heidegger: Phänomenologie der Freiheit, third revised edition. Frankfurt am Main: Weinheim.Google Scholar

Figal, Gunter 1992. Heidegger Zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.Google Scholar

Figal, Gunter 1988. Martin Heidegger: Phaenomenologie der Freiheit. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaeum.Google Scholar

Figal, Gunter, and Veith, Jerome. 2009. The Heidegger Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Fink, Eugen. 2003. Nietzsche’s Philosophy. Translated by Richter, Goetz. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Fried, Gregory. 2011. “A Letter to Emmanuel Faye.” Philosophy Today 55 (3): 219–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fried, Gregory 2000. Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Lauren. 2011. “Reconsidering Relational Autonomy: A Feminist Approach to Selfhood and the Other in the Thinking of Martin Heidegger.” Inquiry 54 (4): 361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Lauren 2010. “Metontology, Moral Particularism, and the ‘Art of Existing:’ A Dialogue Between Heidegger, Aristotle, and Bernard Williams.” Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4): 545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Lauren 2009. “Recognition Reconsidered: A Re-reading of Heidegger’s Being and Time, §26.” Philosophy Today 53 (1): 85–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritsche, Johannes. 2012. “Heidegger’s Being and Time and National Socialism.” Philosophy Today. 56 (3): 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritsche, Johannes 2009. “From National Socialism to Postmodernism: Löwith on Heidegger.” Constellations 16 (1): 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritsche, Johannes 2003. “Competition and Conformity: Heidegger on Distantiality and the ‘They’ in Being and Time.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 24 (2): 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritsche, Johannes 1999. Historical Destiny and National Socialism in Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritzsche, Peter. 2008. Life and Death in the Third Reich. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1998. “On the Political Incompetence of Philosophy.” Diogenes 46 (2) (06): 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1994. Heidegger’s Ways. Translated by Stanley, John W.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1993. “Philosophizing in Opposition: Strauss and Voegelin on Communication and Science.” In Faith and Political Philosophy: the Correspondence Between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin, 1934–1964, eds. Emberley, Peter and Cooper, Barry. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1990. “Superficiality and Ignorance: On Victor Farias’ Publication.” In Martin Heidegger and National Socialism: Questions and Answers, eds. Kettering, Emil and Neske, Günther. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1989. “Back from Syracuse?” Critical Inquiry: 427–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1982. Reason in the Age of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1975. Truth and Method. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, and Strauss, Leo. 1978. “Correspondence Concerning Wahrheit und Methode.” Independent Journal of Philosophy 2: 5–12.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Michael Allen. 2000. “Martin Heidegger’s Aristotelian National Socialism.” Political Theory 28 (2): 140–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillespie, Michael Allen 1984. Hegel, Heidegger, and the Ground of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gonzalez, Francisco J. 2009. Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Francisco J. 2006. “Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur and HG Gadamer.” Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3): 313–45.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Francisco J. 2002. “’Dialectic as Philosophical Embarrassment’: Heidegger’s Critique of Plato’s Method.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3): 361–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Peter. 2010. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grant, George. 1995. Time as History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, George 1986. Technology and Justice. Toronto: Anansi.Google Scholar

Grant, George 1969. Technology and Empire. Toronto: House of Anansi.Google Scholar

Greisch, Jean. 1987. La Parole Heureuse: Martin Heidegger entre les Choses et les Mots. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar

Grondin, Jean. 2005. “Why Reawaken the Question of Being?” In Heidegger’s Being and Time: Critical Essays, ed. Polt, Richard, 15–32. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Grondin, Jean 1987. Le Tournant dans La Pensée de Martin Heidegger. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Grossheim, Michael. 1991. Von Georg Simmel Zu Martin Heidegger: Philosophie Zwischen Leben Und Existenz. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag.Google Scholar

Guignon, Charles B. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guignon, Charles B. 2004. On Being Authentic. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guignon, Charles B. 2000. “Philosophy and Authenticity: Heidegger’s Search for a Ground for Philosophizing.” In Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity, eds. Mark Wrathall and Jeffrey Malpas, 79–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guignon, Charles B. 1999. The Good Life. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Guignon, Charles B. 1983. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Translated by Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1989. “Work and Weltanschauung: The Heidegger Controversy from a German Perspective.” Critical Inquiry: 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1977 [1953]. “Martin Heidegger, on the Publication of Lectures from the year 1935.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 6 (2): 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hancock, Ralph. 2012. The Responsibility of Reason: Theory and Practice in a Liberal Democratic Age. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harries, Karsten. 1994. Martin Heidegger: Politics, Art, and Technology. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar

Hatab, Lawrence. 2000. Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Haugeland, John. 2013. Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Edited by Joseph Rouse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Havel, Václav. 1990. Living in Truth: Twenty-Two Essays Published on the Occasion of the Award of the Erasmus Prize to Václav Havel. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Havel, Václav 1989. Letters To Olga: June 1979–September 1982. New York: H. Holt.Google Scholar

Havel, Václav 1985. Power to the Powerless: Citizens Against the State in Central Eastern Europe. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Havel, Václav 1992. “Address to the World Economic Forum.” 1992 address to the World Economic Forum, at http://www.compilerpress.ca/Competitiveness/Anno/Anno%20Havel.htm. Retrieved August 9, 2012.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1991. The Encyclopedia Logic: Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Science with the Zusätze. Translated by T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Heiden, Konrad. 1969. Der Fuehrer: Hitler’s Rise to Power. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Hodge, Joanna. 1995. Heidegger and Ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Burt C. 2011. The Origin of the Logic of Symbolic Mathematics: Edmund Husserl and Jacob Klein. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. 2012. The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel 2003. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Howard, Philip K. 2011. “Vaclav Havel’s Critique of the West.” Atlantic, December 20.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1999. The Idea of Phenomenology: A Translation of Die Idee der Phaenomenologie, Husserliana II. Translated by Lee, Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, Edmund 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by David Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund 1931. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Gibson, William Ralph Boyce. London: G. Allen & Unwin; Macmillan.Google Scholar

Inwood, Michael. 1992. A Hegel Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kirkland, Sean D. 2007. “Thinking in the Between with Heidegger and Plato.” Research in Phenomenology 37: 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kisiel, Theodore. 2005. “The Demise of Being and Time: 1927–1930.” In Heidegger’s Being and Time: Critical Essays, ed. Richard Polt, 189–214. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Kisiel, Theodore 2002. Heidegger’s Way of Thought: Critical and Interpretative Signposts. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Kisiel, Theodore 1993. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kisiel, Theodore, and Sheehan, Thomas. 2007. Becoming Heidegger: On the Trail of His Early Occasional Writings, 1910–1927. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Kisiel, Theodore J., and Buren, John Van. 1994. Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in His Earliest Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Kleinberg, Ethan. 2005. Generation Existential: Heidegger’s Philosophy in France, 1927–1961. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, . 2005. Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders, the Golden Age, the Breakdown. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Krell, David Farrell. 1992. Daimon Life: Heidegger and Life-Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Krell, David Farrell 1986. Intimations of Mortality. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. 1990. Heidegger, Art, and Politics: The Fiction of the Political. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lampert, Laurence. 1986. Nietzsche’s Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lang, Berel. 1996. Heidegger’s Silence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel. 2001. Is It Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel 1994. “Entretien avec Roger-Pol Droit.” In Les imprévues de l’histoire. Saint-Clément-la-Rivière: Fata Morgana.Google Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel 1951. “L’Ontologie est-Elle fondamentale?” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 56 (1): 88–98.Google Scholar

Lewis, Michael. 2005. Heidegger and the Place of Ethics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl. 1995. Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl 1994. My Life in Germany Before and After 1933: A Report. London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl 1949. Meaning and History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Luchte, James. 2008. Heidegger’s Early Philosophy: The Phenomenology of Ecstatic Temporality. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Luft, Sebastien. 2010. “Reconstruction and Reduction: Natorp and Husserl on Method and the Question of Subjectivity.” In Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, eds. Rudolf A. Makkreel and Sebastian Luft, 59–91. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1990. Heidegger and “the Jews.” Translated by Andreas Michael and Mark S. Roberts. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

MacAvoy, Leslie. 2010. “Formal Indication and the Hermeneutics of Facticity.” Philosophy Today 54: 84–90.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. 1998. Technology, War, and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert 1977. “Heidegger’s Politics: An Interview with Herbert Marcuse by Frederick Olafson.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 6 (1): 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc. 2002. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc 1998. Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Marx, Werner. 1973. Heidegger and the Tradition. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

McEwen, Cameron. 1995. “On Formal Indication: Discussion of the Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time.” Research in Phenomenology 25 (1): 226–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, William. 1999. The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Mirsepassi, Ali. 2011. Political Islam, Iran, and the Enlightenment: Philosophies of Hope and Despair. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mirsepassi, Ali 2000. Intellectual Discourse and the Politics of Modernization: Negotiating Modernity in Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew J. 2005. “Heidegger and Terrorism.” Research in Phenomenology 35 (1): 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miyasaki, Donovan. 2007. “A Ground for Ethics in Heidegger’s Being and Time.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 38 (3): 261–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mummery, Jane. 2002. “Re-reading Interpretation: The Way Forward for an Ethico-Political Engagement.” Philosophy Today 46 (3): 313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Michael. 1978. Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Naess, Arne. 1989. Ecology, Community, and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2002. “Heidegger’s Originary Ethics.” In Heidegger and Practical Philosophy, eds. Francois Raffoul and David Pettigrew, 65–86. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Neumann, Harry. 1985. “Politics or Nothing! Nazism’s Origin in Scientific Contempt for Politics.” Journal of Value Inquiry 19 (3): 225–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newell, Waller R. 1990. “Zarathustra’s Dancing Dialectic.” Interpretation 17 (3): 415–32.Google Scholar

Newell, Waller R 1984. “Heidegger on Freedom and Community: Some Political Implications of his Early Thought.” American Political Science Review 78 (3): 775–84Google Scholar

Nicholson, Graeme. 2005. “The Constitution of Our Being.” In Heidegger’s Being and Time: Critical Essays, ed. Polt, Richard. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1997. Untimely Meditations. Translated by Hollingdale, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nolte, Ernst. 1992. Martin Heidegger: Politik und Geschichte im Leben und Denken. Berlin: Propyläen.Google Scholar

O’Connor, David. 2002. “Leo Strauss’s Aristotle and Martin Heidegger’s Politics.” In Aristotle and Modern Politics, ed. Tessitore, Aristide. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Okrent, Mark. 1991. Heidegger’s Pragmatism: Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olafson, Frederick A. 2006. “The Unity of Heidegger’s Thought.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 2nd edition, ed. Guignon, Charles B., 97–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olafson, Frederick A 1998. Heidegger and the Ground of Ethics: A Study of Mitsein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ott, Hugo. 1988. Martin Heidegger: Unterwegs zu seiner Biographie. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.Google Scholar

Overgaard, Søren. 2010. “Ordinary Experience and the Epoché: Husserl and Heidegger Versus Rosen (and Cavell).” Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3): 307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkes, Graham. 2009. “Heidegger and Japanese Fascism: An Unsubstantiated Connection.” In Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy 6: Confluences and Cross-Currents, eds. Bouso, Raquel and Heisig, James W., 347–71. Nagoya: Nanzan.Google Scholar

Parkes, Graham 1997. “The Putative Fascism of the Kyoto School and the Political.” Philosophy East and West 47 (3): 305–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patocka, Jan. 1998. Body, Community, Language, World. Translated by Erazim Kohák. Edited by James Dodd. Peru, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Philipse, Herman. 1999. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being: A Critical Interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, James. 2005. Heidegger’s Volk: Between National Socialism and Poetry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pontuso, James F. 2004. Václav Havel: Civic Responsibility in the Postmodern Age. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Pöggeler, Otto. 1987. Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar

Pöggeler, Otto, and Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie, eds. 1988. Heidegger und die praktische Philosophe. Frankfurt. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Prauss, Gerold. 1999. Knowing and Doing in Heidegger’s Being and Time. Translated by Gary Steiner and Jeffrey S. Turner. Amherst, NY: Humanity.Google Scholar

Rahnema, Ali. 1999. An Islamic Utopian: A Political Biography of Ali Shariati: London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Rajaee, Farhang. 2007. Islamism and Modernism: The Changing Discourse in Iran. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Reid, James D. 2005. “Ethical Criticism in Heidegger’s Early Freiburg Lectures.” Review of Metaphysics 59 (1): 33–71.Google Scholar

Richardson, William. 2003. Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought. New York: Fordham.Google Scholar

Rickey, Christopher. 2001. Revolutionary Saints: Heidegger, National Socialism, and Antinomian Politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Robbins, Harold J. 1978. “Duns Scotus’s Theory of the Categories and of Meaning by Martin Heidegger.” Translated from the German and with Introduction by Harold Robbins. Ph.D. dissertation. DePaul University.Google Scholar

Rockmore, Tom. 2009. “Forward.” In Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933–1935, Faye, Emmanuel, vii–xxii. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Rockmore, Tom 1995. Heidegger and French Philosophy: Humanism, Antihumanism, and Being. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rockmore, Tom 1991. On Heidegger’s Nazism and Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Roesner, Martina. 2011. “Zwischen transzendentaler Genese und faktischer Existenz. Konfigurationen des Lebensbegriffs bei Natorp, Husserl und Heidegger.” Husserl Studies 28 (1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1991. Essays On Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, Stanley. 2002. The Elusiveness of the Ordinary Studies in the Possibility of Philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, Stanley 1993. Question of Being: A Reversal of Heidegger. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, Stanley 1969. Nihilism: A Philosophical Essay. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert. 1928. “Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit.” Mind 38: 355–70.Google Scholar

Sadler, Ted. 1996. Heidegger and Aristotle: The Question of Being. London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Safranski, Rüdiger. 1998. Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sanchez, Carlos Alberto. 2008. “Heidegger in Mexico: Emilio Uranga’s Ontological Hermeneutics.” Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4): 441–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheler, Max. 1973. Formalism in Ethics and Non-formal Ethics of Values: A New Attempt Toward the Foundation of an Ethical Personalism. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans Bernard. 2005. “The Broken ‘We’: Making Sense of Heidegger’s Analysis of Everydayness.” Topos 11: 16–27.Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans Bernard 2004. “Heidegger and the ‘Cartesian Brainwash’: Towards a Non-Individualistic Account of Dasein.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 35 (2): 132–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmid, Hans Bernard 2001. “Gemeinsames Dasein und die Uneigentlichkeit von Individualität.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 49 (5): 665–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schürmann, Reiner. 1987. Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Schürmann, Reiner, Critchley, Simon, and Levine, Steven. 2008. On Heidegger’s Being and Time. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Anette. 2010. “Reply to Taylor Carman: Heidegger’s Anti-neo-Kantianism.” Philosophical Forum. 41 (1): 143–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Charles E. 2010. “Inauthenticity and Authenticity in Being and Time.” In Heidegger: Key Concepts, ed., Bret W. Davis, 57–68. New York: Acumen.Google Scholar

Shari`ati, Ali. 1980. Red Shi’ism. Houston: Free Islamic Literatures.Google Scholar

Shari`ati, Alin.d. “Red Shi ‘ism vs. Black Shi ‘ism,” at http://www.iranchamber.com/personalities/ashariati/works/red_black_shiism.php. Retrieved August 2013.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Thomas. 1995. “Heidegger’s New Aspect: On In-Sein, Zeitlichkeit, and the Genesis of Being and Time.” Research in Phenomenology 25 (1): 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheehan, Thomas 1993. “A Normal Nazi.” New York Review of Books 40 (1–2).Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans D. 1993. Heidegger’s Crisis: Philosophy and Politics in Nazi Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Gregory Bruce. 2007. Martin Heidegger: Paths Taken, Paths Opened. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Smith, Gregory Bruce 1996. Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the Transition to Postmodernity. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Soroush, Abdoulkarim, and Rahimi, Reza K. “I Am Not the Reformists’ Godfather.” August 20, 2006 [cited March 7, 2014]. Available from http://www.drsoroush.com/English/Interviews/E-INT-IAmNottheReformistsGodfather.html.Google Scholar

Ste. Croix, G. E. M. 1992. “Aristotle on History and Poetry.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics, ed. Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, 23–32. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, Fritz Richard. 1999. Dreams and Delusions: The Drama of German History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, Günther. 1947. “On the Pseudo-Concreteness of Heidegger’s Philosophy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (3): 337–71.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo. 1983. Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, Leo 1989. The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism: An Introduction to the Thought of Leo Strauss, Essays and Lectures, ed. Pangle, Thomas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo 1966. Socrates and Aristophanes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo 1961. The City and Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo 1958. What Is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Streeter, Ryan. 1997. “Heidegger’s Formal Indication: A Question of Method in Being and Time.” Man and World 30 (4): 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strong, Tracy. Politics Without Vision: Thinking Without a Banister in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taminiaux, Jacques. 1994. “The Husserlian Heritage in Heidegger’s Notion of the Self.” In Reading Heidegger From the Start: Essays in His Earliest Thought, eds. Kisiel, Theodore J., Buren, John, 269–92. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Taminiaux, Jacques 1991. Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology. Translated by Gendre, Michael. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MD: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles 2006. “Engaged Agency and Background in Heidegger.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, second edition, ed. Charles Guignon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–21.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles 1995. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MD: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles 1993. “Engaged Agency and Background in Heidegger.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, ed. Guignon, Charles, 317–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles 1985. Philosophical Papers 2: Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Charles 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiele, Leslie Paul. 2013. Sustainability. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Thiele, Leslie Paul 2011. Indra’s Net and the Midas Touch: Living Sustainably in a Connected World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiele, Leslie Paul 1999. Environmentalism for a New Millennium: The Challenge of Coevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiele, Leslie Paul 1997. “Postmodernity and the Routinization of Novelty: Heidegger on Boredom and Technology.” Polity 29 (4): 489–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiele, Leslie Paul 1995. Timely Meditations: Martin Heidegger and Postmodern Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiele, Leslie Paul 1994. “Heidegger on Freedom: Political Not Metaphysical.” American Political Science Review 88 (2): 278–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Iain. 2009. “Understanding Technology Ontotheologically, or: the Danger and the Promise of Heidegger, an American Perspective.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, eds. Friis, Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen, Slinger, Evan, and Riis, Søren, 146–68. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thomson, Iain 2007. “On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Reading Heidegger Backwards: White’s Time and Death.” Inquiry 50 (1): 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Iain 2005a. “Heidegger and National Socialism.” In A Companion to Heidegger, eds. Dreyfus, Hubert and Wrathall, Mark, 32–48. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Iain 2005b. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Iain 2003. “Heidegger and the Politics of the University.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (4): 515–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1887. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Abhandlung des Communismus und des Socialismus als Empirischer Culturformen. Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag.Google Scholar

Tügendhat, Ernst. 1967. Über den Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vahdat, Farzin. 2002. God and Juggernaut: Iran’s Intellectual Encounter with Modernity. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Van Buren, John. 1995. “The Ethics of Formale Anzeigein Heidegger.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (2): 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Buren, John 1994. The Young Heidegger: Rumor of the Hidden King. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Vattimo, Gianni, and Zabala, Santiago. 2011. Hermeneutic Communism from Heidegger to Marx. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velkley, Richard L. 2011. Heidegger, Strauss, and the Premises of Philosophy: On Original Forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velkley, Richard L. 2007. “On the Roots of Rationalism: Strauss’s Natural Right and History as Response to Heidegger.” Review of Politics 70: 245–59.Google Scholar

Velkley, Richard L. 2006. “Freedom from the Good: Heidegger’s Idealist Grounding of Politics.” In Logos and Eros: Essays Honoring Stanley Rosen, ed. Ranasinghe, Nalin, 246–59. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar

Velkley, Richard L. 2002. Being after Rousseau: Philosophy and Culture in Question. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Velkley, Richard L. 1989. Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velkley, Richard L. 1987. “Edmund Husserl.” In History of Political Philosophy, eds. Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, 870–87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Villa, Dana. 1995. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Vogel, Lawrence. 1994. The Fragile “We”: Ethical Implications of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

von Schoenborn, Alexander. 1972. “Heideggerian Everydayness.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 3 (3): 103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, James F. 1995. Heidegger’s Political Thinking. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Weinberger, Jerry. 1992. “Politics and the Problem of Technology: An Essay on Heidegger and the Tradition of Political Philosophy.” American Political Science Review 86 (01): 112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Stephen K. 2009. “Violence, Weak Ontology, and Late-Modernity.” Political Theory 37 (6): 808–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Stephen K. 1991. Political Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

White, Stephen K. 1990. “Heidegger and the Difficulties of a Postmodern Ethics and Politics.” Political Theory 18, 80–103.Google Scholar

Winter, Michael. 1997. “Aristotle, hôs epi to polu Relations, and a Demonstrative Science of Ethics.” Phronesis 42 (2): 163–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woessner, Martin. 2010. Heidegger in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolin, Richard. 1990. The Politics of Being: The Political Thought of Martin Heidegger. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Ralph C. 2004. Flannery O’Connor and the Christ-Haunted South. Grand Rapids. MI: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Yack, Bernard. 1992. The Longing for Total Revolution: Philosophic Sources of Social Discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Julian. 1997. Heidegger, Philosophy, Nazism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael E. 2003. Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, fourth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael E 1994. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael E 1993. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. Berkeley. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael E 1990. Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, and Art. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael E 1981. Eclipse of the Self: The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of Authenticity. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Catherine H. 1996. Postmodern Platos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Catherine H 1990. “Martin Heidegger: His Philosophy and His Politics.” Political Theory 18 (1): 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuckert, Catherine H., and Zuckert, Michael P.. 2006. The Truth About Leo Strauss. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar