References

Thomas Natsoulas

doi:10.1017/9781316017791.010

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2018

Thomas Natsoulas

Show author details

Thomas Natsoulas: Affiliation:
University of California, Davis

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: States of Consciousness
The Pulses of Experience
, pp. 431 - 440

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316017791.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, L. 1965. “Ryle’s ontology of mind,” in L. Addis and D. Lewis (eds.), Moore and Ryle: Two Ontologies (The Hague, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 1–101.Google Scholar

Addis, L. 1975. Logic of Society (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar

Addis, L. 1982. “Behaviorism and the philosophy of the act,” Noûs, 16: 399–420.Google Scholar

Ainslie, G. 1985. “Behavior is what can be reinforced,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8: 53–54.Google Scholar

Alston, W. P. 1991. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1968. A Materialist Theory of the Mind (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1953. “Theoretical psychology,” in Annual Review of Psychology, 4: 435–458.Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1955/1960. “Intentionality,” in G. Bergmann (ed.), Meaning and Existence (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press), pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1956. “The contribution of John B. Watson,” Psychological Review, 63: 265–276.Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1962. “Purpose, function, scientific explanation,” Acta Sociologica, 5: 225–238.Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1964. Logic and Reality (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1967–1968. “Diversity,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 41: 21–34.Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1981. “Notes on the ontology of minds,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6: 189–213.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. 1889/1910. Time and Free Will (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Bergson, H. 1902–1923/1947. The Creative Mind (New York: Philosophical Library).Google Scholar

Blanshard, B. and Skinner, B. F. 1966–1967. “The problem of consciousness – a debate,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 27: 317–337.Google Scholar

Bloom, H., Jesus and Yahweh: The Names Divine (New York: Riverhead Books, 2005).Google Scholar

Brentano, F. C. 1874/1973. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (New York: Humanities Press).Google Scholar

Brodbeck, M. 1963. “Meaning and action,” Philosophy of Science, 30: 309–324.Google Scholar

Brodbeck, M. 1966a. “Discussion: Objectivism and interaction: A reaction to Margolis,” Philosophy of Science, 33: 287–292.Google Scholar

Brodbeck, M. 1966b. “Mental and physical: identity versus sameness,” in Feyerabend, P. K. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Mind, Matter, and Method (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 40–58.Google Scholar

Brodbeck, M. 1971–1972. “Mind: From within and from without,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 45: 42–55.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. 1982. “A brain on the mind,” Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, 27: 5–6.Google Scholar

Cairns-Smith, A. G. 1996. Evolving the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Dainton, B. F. 2000. Stream of Consciousness: Unity and Continuity in Conscious Experience (London; New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Day, W. F., Jr. 1975. “Contemporary behaviorism and the concept of intention,” Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 23: 65–131.Google Scholar

Day, W. F. 1983. “On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism,” Behaviorism, 11: 89–102.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1906. “The terms ‘conscious’ and ‘consciousness,’” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method, 2: 39–41.Google Scholar

Dulany, D. E. 1997. “Consciousness in the explicit (deliberative) and implicit (evocative),” in Cohen, J. and Schooler, J. (eds.), Scientific Approaches to Consciousness (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 179–212.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1895/1957. Project for a Scientific Psychology. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. I (London, Hogarth), pp. 295–387.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1896/1957. “Extract from a letter to Wilheim Fliess,” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. I (London: Hogarth), pp. 388–391.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1900/1953. The Interpretation of Dreams. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. IV and Vol. V (London: Hogarth).Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1911/1953. “Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning,” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XII (London: Hogarth), pp. 218–226.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1912/1958. “A note on the unconscious in psychoanalysis,”, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XII (translated and edited by J. Strachey, London: Hogarth), pp. 260–266.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1915/1957. “The unconscious,” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV (London: Hogarth), pp. 166–204.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1920/1955. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XVIII (London: Hogarth), pp. 1–64.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1923/1961. The Ego and the Id. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIX (London: Hogarth), pp. 12–66.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1925/1959. “An autobiographical study,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XX (London: Hogarth), pp. 7–70.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1925/1961. “The resistances to psycho-analysis,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XVIII (London: Hogarth), pp. 211–225.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1933/1964. New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXII (London: Hogarth), pp. 5–182.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1938a/1964. An Outline of Psycho-analysis. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXIII (London: Hogarth), pp. 141–208.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1938b/1964. “Some elementary lessons in psycho-analysis,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXIII (London: Hogarth), pp. 279–286.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1950. The Perception of the Visual World (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1971. “The information available in pictures,” Leonardo, 4: 27–35.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar

Graham, G. 1984. “Sensation and classification,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 558–559.Google Scholar

Griffin, D. R. 1978. “Prospects for a cognitive ethology,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1: 527–538.Google Scholar

Grossmann, R. 1960. “Propositional attitudes,” Philosophical Quarterly, 10: 301–312.Google Scholar

Grossmann, R. 1965. The Structure of Mind (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. 1967. Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradox (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press).Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. 1859–1860. Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic (Boston: Gould).Google Scholar

Hayes, S. C. and Brownstein, A. J. 1985. “Mentalism and the ‘as-yet-unexplained’: A reply to Killeen,” Behaviorism, 13: 151–154.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1954. “The problem of consciousness and introspection,” in Adrian, E. D., Bremer, F., and Jasper, H. H. (eds.), Brain Mechanisms and Consciousness: A Symposium (Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas), pp. 402–421.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1960. “The American revolution,” American Psychologist, 15: 735–745.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1968 “Concerning imagery,” Psychological Review, 75: 466–477.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1969. “The mind’ s eye,” Psychology Today, 2: 54–57, 67–68.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1972. A Textbook of Psychology, 3rd edn. (Philadelphia: Saunders).Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1974. “What psychology is about,” American Psychologist, 29: 71–79.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1977. “To know your own mind,” in Nicholas, J. M. (ed.), Images, Perception, and Knowledge (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel), pp. 213–219.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1978. “Behavioral evidence of thought and consciousness,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1: 357.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1980. Essay on Mind (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. 1981. “Consider mind as a biological problem,” Neuroscience, 6: 2419–2422.Google Scholar

Henle, M. 1974. “On naive realism,” in MacLeod, R. B. and Pick, H. L. Jr. (eds.), Perception: Essays in Honor of James J. Gibson (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 40–56.Google Scholar

Henle, M. 1977. “On the distinction between the phenomenal and the physical object,” in Nicholas, J. M. (ed.), Images, Perception, and Knowledge (Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel), pp. 187–194.Google Scholar

Hochberg, H. 1974. “Intentions, facts, and propositions,” in Gram, M. S. and Klemke, E. D. (eds.), The Ontological Turn (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press), pp. 168–192.Google Scholar

Hochberg, H. 1981. “Intentionality, logical structure, and Bergmann’s ontology,” Noûs, 15: 155–164.Google Scholar

Hocutt, M. 1985. “Spartans, straw men and symptoms,” Behaviorism, 13: 87–97.Google Scholar

Holt, E. B. 1912. “The place of illusory experience in a realistic world,” in The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy by Holt, Edwin B., Marvin, Walter T., Montague, William Pepperrel, Perry, Ralph Barton, Pitkin, Walther B., and Spaulding, Edward Gleason (New York: Macmillan), pp. 303–373.Google Scholar

Huxley, T. 1880. Lay Sermons, Addresses, and Reviews (London: Appleton).Google Scholar

James, W. 1883–1884/1988. “Chapter II: The object of cognition and the judgement of reality,” in W. James, Manuscript Essays and Notes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 261–290.Google Scholar

James, W. 1884. “On some omissions of introspective psychology,” Mind, 4: 1–26.Google Scholar

James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. (New York: Holt).Google Scholar

James, W. 1892/1984. Psychology, Briefer Course (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

James, W. 1899/1925. Talks to Teachers on Psychology: And to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals (New York: Holt).Google Scholar

James, W. 1902/1982. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study of Human Nature (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar

James, W. 1904/1912. “Does ‘consciousness’ exist?” in W. James, Essays in Radical Empiricism (New York: Longmans, Green), pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

James, W. 1909/1987. A Pluralistic Universe. In William James: Writings from 1902–1910 (New York: Library Classics of the United States), pp. 625–820.Google Scholar

James, W. 1911/1987. Some Problems of Philosophy. In William James: Writings from 1902–1910 (New York: Library Classics of the United States), pp. 979–1106.Google Scholar

Kneale, W. 1949–1950. “Experience and introspection,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 50: 1–28.Google Scholar

Köhler, W. 1938. The Place of Value in the World of Fact (New York: Liveright).Google Scholar

Köhler, W. 1947. Gestalt Psychology (New York: Liveright).Google Scholar

Köhler, W. 1960. “The mind–body problem,” in Hook, S. (ed.) Dimensions of Mind (New York: New York University Press), pp. 3–23.Google Scholar

Köhler, W. 1969. The Task of Gestalt Psychology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Langer, S. 1967. Mind, vol. 1 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J.-B. 1967/1973. The Language of Psychoanalysis (New York: Norton).Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1706/1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Logue, A. W. 1985. “Functional behaviorism: Where the pain is does not matter,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8: 66.Google Scholar

Lombardo, T. J. 1987. The Reciprocity of Perceiver and Environment (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).Google Scholar

Lucas, J. R. 1973. A Treatise on Time and Space (London: Methuen).Google Scholar

Lyons, W. 1984. “Behavior and ‘the problem of privacy,’” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 635.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. 1984. “Consciousness and causality,” in D. M. Armstrong and N. Malcolm (eds.), Consciousness and Causality: A Debate on the Nature of Mind (Oxford, UK: Blackwell), pp. 1–101.Google Scholar

Marcel, A. J. 1988. “Phenomenal experience and functionalism,” in Marcel, A. J. and Bisiach, E. (eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 121–158.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. 1966a. “Discussion: Reply to a reaction: Some remarks on Brodbeck’s objectivism,” Philosophy of Science, 33: 293–302.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. 1966b. “Objectivism and interactionism,” Philosophy of Science, 33: 118–123.Google Scholar

McGrath, W. J. 1986. Freud’s Discovery of Psychoanalysis: The Politics of Hysteria (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Melzack, R. and Wall, P. D. 1983. The Challenge of Pain (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1873/1972. A System of Logic (Books I-III) (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar

Myers, G. 1986. William James: His Life and Thought (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1970. “Concerning introspective ‘knowledge,’” Psychological Bulletin, 73: 89–111.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1983a. “A selective review of conceptions of consciousness with special reference to behavioristic contributions,” Cognition and Brain Theory, 6: 417–447.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1983b. “Perhaps the most difficult problem faced by behaviorism,” Behaviorism, 11: 1–26.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1983c. “What are the objects of perceptual consciousness?” American Journal of Psychology, 9: 435–467.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1983d. “Concepts of consciousness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4: 13–59.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1984a. “Freud and consciousness: I. Intrinsic consciousness,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 7: 195–232.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1984b. “Gustav Bergmann’s psychophysiological parallelism,” Behaviorism: A Forum for Critical Discussion, 12: 41–69.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1986. “On the radical behaviorist conception of consciousness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7: 87–115.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1987. “Roger W. Sperry’s monist interactionism,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 8: 1–21.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1988. “On the radical behaviorist conception of pain experience,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 9: 29–56.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1989. “Freud and consciousness: III. The importance of tertiary consciousness,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 12: 97–123.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1991. “‘Why do things look as they do?’ Some Gibsonian answers to Koffka’s question,” Philosophical Psychology, 4: 183–202.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1992a. “The concept of consciousness sub-three: The awareness meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22: 199–225.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1992b. “The tunnel effect, Gibson’s perception theory, and reflective seeing,” Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 54: 160–174.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1992–1993a. “The stream of consciousness: I. William James’s pulses,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12: 3–21.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1992–1993b. The stream of consciousness: II. William James’s specious present,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12: 367–385.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1993a. “Perceiving, its component stream of perceptual experience, and Gibson’s ecological approach,” Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55: 248–257.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1993b. “What is wrong with the appendage theory of consciousness?” Philosophical Psychology, 6: 137–154.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1993–1994a. “The stream of consciousness: IV. Adolf Grunbaum’s atomicity,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13: 220–247.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1993–1994b. “The stream of consciousness: V. William James’s change of view,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13: 347–366.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1994–1995. “The stream of consciousness: VIII. James’s ejective consciousness (first part),” Imagination, Cognition & Personality. 14: 333–352.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1994. “The concept of consciousness sub-four: The reflective meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 24: 373–400.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1995–1996a. “The stream of consciousness: IX. James’s ejective consciousness (second part),” Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 15: 171–191.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1995–1996b. “The stream of consciousness: X. A critique of James’s appendage theory of consciousness (first part),” Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 15: 365–384.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1996a. “The sciousness hypothesis – Part I,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17: 45–66.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1996b. “The sciousness hypothesis – Part II,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17: 185–206.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1996–1997. “The stream of consciousness: XI. A critique of James’s appendage theory of consciousness (second part),” Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 16: 63–82.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1998a. “Consciousness and self-awareness,” in Ferrari, M. and Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), Self-awareness: Its Nature and Development (New York, Guilford), pp. 12–33.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1998b. “Tertiary consciousness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19: 141–176.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1998c. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: James’s ubiquitous feeling aspect,” Review of General Psychology, 2: 123–152.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1999b. “An ecological and phenomenological perspective on consciousness and perception: Contact with the world at the very heart of the being of consciousness,” Review of General Psychology, 3: 224–245.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 1999a. “A commentary system for consciousness?!” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 20: 155–181.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2000a. “Consciousness and conscience,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21: 327–352.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2000b. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: Further considerations in the light of James’s conception,” Consciousness and Emotion, 1: 139–166.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2001a. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: Attempted inroads from the first-person perspective,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 22: 219–248.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2001b. “The Freudian conscious,” Consciousness and Emotion, 2: 1–28.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2002. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: O’Shaughnessy and the mythology of the attention,” Consciousness and Emotion, 3: 35–64.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2002–2003. “The stream of consciousness: XXV. Awareness as commentary (first part),” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 21: 347–366.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2003. “Freud and consciousness: XIII. Seeing in the unconscious!?” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 26: 517–564.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2003–2004. “The stream of consciousness: XXVIII. Does consciousness exist? (first part),” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 23: 121–141.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2005. “Freud’s phenomenology of the emotions,” in Ellis, R. D. and Newton, N. (eds.), Consciousness and Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception (Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamin), pp. 217–241.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2005a. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: A thesis of neutral monism considered,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 26: 281–306.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2005b. “The Varieties of Religious Experience considered from the perspective of James’s account of the stream of consciousness,” in Ellis, R. D. and Newton, N. (eds.), Consciousness and Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception (Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamin), pp. 303–325.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2011. “A dislocation of consciousness,” in Charles, E. P. (ed.), A New Look at New Realism: The Psychology and Philosophy of E. B. Holt (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press), pp. 127–155.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2013. Consciousness and Perceptual Experience: An Ecological and Phenomenological Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. 2015. The Conceptual Representation of Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

O’Connor, D. J. 1952. John Locke (Harmondsworth: Penguin Press).Google Scholar

O’Shaughnessy, B. 1987. “Consciousness,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 10: 49–62.Google Scholar

O’Shaughnessy, B. 2000. Consciousness and the World (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Rachlin, H. 1984. “Mental, yes. Private, no,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 566–567.Google Scholar

Rachlin, H. 1985a. “Ghostbusting,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8: 73–83.Google Scholar

Rachlin, H. 1985b. “Pain and behavior,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8: 43–53.Google Scholar

Reed, E. S. 1988. James J. Gibson and the Psychology of Perception (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Reed, E. S. and Jones, R. 1982. Reasons for Realism: Selected Essays of James J. Gibson (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).Google Scholar

Robinson, D. R. 1984. “Behaviorism at seventy,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 641–643.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, D. 1976. “Mentality and neutrality,” Journal of Philosophy, 73: 386–415.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1927. The Analysis of Matter (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1944. “Reply to criticisms,” in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press), pp. 681–741.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1948. Human Knowledge (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1956. Portraits from Memory and Other Essays (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1959. My Philosophical Development (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 1980a. “Minds, brains, and programs,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–424.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 1980b. “Intrinsic intentionality,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 450–457.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1981. “Foundations for a metaphysics of pure process,” The Monist, 64: 3–90.Google Scholar

Shneidman, E. S. 1981. Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1945a. “The operational analysis of psychological terms,” Psychological Review, 52: 270–277.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1945b. “Rejoinders and second thoughts,” Psychological Review, 52: 291–294.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1953. Science and Human Behavior (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1957. Verbal Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice -Hall).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1963. “Behaviorism at fifty,” Science, 140: 951–958.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1969. Contingencies of Reinforcement (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1972a. Beyond Freedom and Dignity (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1972b. Cumulative Record (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1974. About Behaviorism (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1978. Reflections on Behaviorism and Society (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice -Hall).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1980a. Notebooks (Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1980b. “The experimental analysis of operant behavior: A history,” in Reiber, R. W. and Salzinger, K. (eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-Historical Perspectives (New York: Academic Press), pp. 191–202.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1984a. “Coming to terms with private events,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 572–581.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1984b. “Representations and misrepresentations,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 655–667.Google Scholar

Solomon, R. C. 1974. “Freud’s neurological theory of mind.” In Wollheim, R (ed.), Freud: A Collection of Critical Essays (Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday), pp. 25–52.Google Scholar

Sperry, R. W. 1972. “Science and the problem of values,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 16: 115–130.Google Scholar

Sperry, R. W. 1976. “Changing concepts of consciousness and free will,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 20: 9–19.Google Scholar

Sperry, R. W. 1977. “Bridging science and values,” American Psychologist, 32: 237–245.Google Scholar

Sperry, R. W. 1980. “Mind–brain interaction: Mentalism yes; dualism no,” Neuroscience, 5: 195–206.Google Scholar

Sperry, R. W. 1982. “Some effects of disconnecting the cerebral hemispheres,” Science, 217: 1223–1226.Google Scholar

Sprigge, T. L. S. 1993. James and Bradley: American Truth and British Reality (Chicago: Open Court).Google Scholar

Sternbach, R. A. 1968. Pain (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar

Sternbach, R. A. 1978. “Psychological dimensions and perceptual analysis, including pathologies of pain,” in Carterette, E. C. and Friedman, M. P. (eds.), Handbook of Perception (New York: Academic Press), 6B: 231–261.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1997. “The self,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4: 405–428.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary, 20 vol., second ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Tye, M. 2003. Consciousness and Persons: Unity and Identity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Weiskrantz, L. 1997. Consciousness Lost and Found: A Neuropsychological Exploration ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Zuriff, G. E. 1984. “Radical behaviorism and theoretical entities,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 572.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive