Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T21:46:09.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Cognitive and Neural Foundations of Learning

from Part I - Fundamental Issues in Learning and Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Kenneth G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Âkerstedt, T. 2006. Psychosocial stress and impaired sleep. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 32: 493501.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., and Reynolds, R. E. 2009. What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist 44: 176192.Google Scholar
Ariga, A., and Lleras, A. 2011. Brief and rare mental “breaks” keep you focused: Deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition 118: 439443.Google Scholar
Azevedo, R., and Bernard, R. M. 1995. A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 13: 111127.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., and Longman, D. J. A. 1978. The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics 21: 627635.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. T., and Ford, J. K. 1988. Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology 41: 63105.Google Scholar
Balkin, T. J., Rupp, T., Picchioni, D., and Wesensten, N. J, 2008. Sleep loss and sleepiness: Current issues. Chest 134: 653-660.Google Scholar
Banks, S., and Dinges, D. 2007. Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 3: 519528.Google Scholar
Bear, M. F., Cooper, L. M., and Ebner, F. F. 1989. Synaptic modification model of memory and learning. In Inkhauser, B., ed., Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Supplement One, 156160. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bell, B. S., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2008. Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 296316.Google Scholar
Bjork, E. L., and Bjork, R. A. 2011. Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In Gernsbacher, M. A., Pew, R. W., Hough, L. M., and Pomerantz, J. R., eds., Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, 5664. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. 1994. Memory and meta-memory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J. and Shimamura, A., eds., Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing, 185205. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., and Kornell, N. 2013. Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology 64: 417444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Born, J., Rasch, B., and Gais, S. 2006. Sleep to remember. The Neuroscientist 12: 410424.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M. 2009. Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology 46: 111.Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D., and Johnson, M. K. 1972. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 717726.Google Scholar
Bruer, J. T. 2006. Points of view: On the implications of neuroscience research for science of teaching and learning: Are there any? CBE Life Sciences Education 5: 104110.Google Scholar
Bunge, S. A., and Kahn, I. 2009. Cognition: An overview of neuroimaging techniques. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience 2: 10631067.Google Scholar
Butcher, K. R. 2006. Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology 98: 182197.Google Scholar
Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Benitez, S., and Chang, J. 2009. Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior 25: 483489.Google Scholar
Carter, M., and Beier, M. E. 2010. The effectiveness of error management training with working-aged adults. Personnel Psychology 63: 641675.Google Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., and Rohrer, D. 2006. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 132: 354380.Google Scholar
Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8: 293332.Google Scholar
Clark, R. C. 2014. Evidence-Based Training Methods: A Guide for Training Professionals. Arlington, VA: American Society for Training and Development.Google Scholar
Clark, R. C., and Mayer, R. E. 2008. Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement 47 (9): 513.Google Scholar
Clark, R. E., and Voogel, A. 1985. Transfer of training principles for instructional design. Education Communication and Technology Journal 33: 113123.Google Scholar
Corbalan, G., Paas, F., and Cuypers, H. 2010. Computer-based feedback in linear algebra: Effects on transfer performance and motivation. Computers and Education 55: 692703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, M., and Shulman, G. L. 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 3: 201215.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I., and Lockhart, R. S. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 671684.Google Scholar
Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., and De Gennaro, L. 2006. Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance. Sleep Medicine Reviews 10: 323337.Google Scholar
De Bruyckere, P., Kirschner, P. A., and Hulshof, C. D. 2015. Urban Myths about Learning and Education. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dempster, F. N. 1988. The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist 43: 627634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, I. M., and Dommett, E. J. 2010. Neuroscience: Viable applications in education? Neuroscientist 16: 349356.Google Scholar
Diekelmann, S., and Born, J. 2010. The memory function of sleep. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 114126.Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., and Willingham, D. T. 2013. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 141: 458.Google Scholar
Estes, W. K. 1955. Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review 62: 369377.Google Scholar
Evans, D. R., Baer, R. A., and Segerstrom, S. C. 2009. The effects of mindfulness and self-consciousness on persistence. Personality and Individual Differences 47: 379382.Google Scholar
Fenn, K. M., Nusbaum, H. C., and Margoliash, D. 2003. Consolidation during sleep of perceptual learning of spoken language. Nature 42 (5): 614616.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. M. 1965. The Conditions of Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., and D’Esposito, M. 2005. Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience 8: 12981300.Google Scholar
Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., and Marsh, H. W. 2013. Designing instructional text in a conversational style: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 25: 445472.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. 1979. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory and Cognition 7: 95112.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. 2009. Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science 323 (5910): 6971.Google Scholar
Halls, J. 2014 . Memory and cognition in learning. Infoline; Tips, Tools, and Intelligence for Training 31 (May): Issue 1405.Google Scholar
Harrison, Y., and Horne, J. A. 2000. The impact of sleep deprivation on decision-making: A review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6: 236249.Google Scholar
Hesketh, B. 1997. Dilemmas in training for transfer and retention. Applied Psychology: An International Review 46: 317339.Google Scholar
Howell, W. C., and Cooke, N. J. 1989. Training the human information processor: A look at cognitive models. In Goldstein, I., ed., Training and Development in Work Organizations, 121182. New York: Jossey-Bass,Google Scholar
Hruby, G. G. 2012. Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, W. A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal 33: 692724.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., and Berman, M. G. 2010. Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5: 4357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keith, N., and Frese, M. 2008. Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 5969.Google Scholar
Killgore, W.D.S. 2010. Effects of sleep deprivation on cognition. Progress in Brain Research 185: 105129.Google Scholar
Klein, T. A., Neumann, J., Reuter, M., Hennig, J., Von Cramon, D. Y., and Ullsperger, M. 2014. Genetically determined differences in learning from errors. Science 318: 16421645.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., and DeNisi, A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119: 254284.Google Scholar
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., and Salas, E. 1993. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 311328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. 1979. Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research 49: 371383.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. 2008. Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist 63: 760769.Google Scholar
Merriënboer, J. J., and Sweller, J. 2005. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review 17: 147177.Google Scholar
Moreno, R. 2004. Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional science 32 (1–2): 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. 1977. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16: 519533.Google Scholar
Payne, J. D. 2011. Learning, memory and sleep in humans. Sleep Medicine Clinics 6: 1530.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A. 2000. Imaging brain plasticity: conceptual and methodological issues – A theoretical review. Neuroimage 12: 113.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I., and Rothbart, M. K. 2007. Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 123.Google Scholar
Renkl, A. 2005. The worked-out examples principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E., ed., Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 229245. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rey, G. D. 2012. A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review 7: 216237.Google Scholar
Richtel, M. 2010. Growing up digital, wired for distraction. New York Times, Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/technology/21brain.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (accessed April 23, 2017).Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L., and Karpicke, J. D. 2006. The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science 13: 181210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, D., and Taylor, K. 2007. The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science 35: 481498Google Scholar
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., and Sholar, B. 2010. Tests enhance the transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36: 233239.Google Scholar
Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J. A. 2001. The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual review of psychology 52: 471499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., and Smith-Jentsch, K. A. 2012. The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 132: 74101.Google Scholar
Sawaki, R., and Luck, S. J. 2010. Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 72: 14551470.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. A., and Bjork, R. A. 1992. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science 3: 207217.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H., and Zimmerman, B. J., eds. 2012. Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1998. What do we know about learning? Journal of Engineering Education 87: 343348.Google Scholar
Sisti, H. M., Glass, A. L., and Shors, T. J. 2007. Neurogenesis and the spacing effect: Learning over time enhances memory and the survival of new neurons. Learning and Memory 14: 368375.Google Scholar
Sitzmann, T., and Johnson, S. 2014. The paradox of seduction by irrelevant details: How irrelevant information helps and hinders self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences 34: 111.Google Scholar
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., and Wegner, D. M. 2011. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333: 776778.Google Scholar
Stickgold, R. 2005. Sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Nature 437: 12721278.Google Scholar
Sweller, J. 1999. Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, K., and Rohrer, D. 2010. The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24: 837848.Google Scholar
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. 2014. Making Classrooms Better: 50 Practical Applications of Mind, Brain, and Education Science. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Vago, D. R., and David, S. A. 2012. Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence S-ART: A framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 296.Google Scholar
Van Dongen, H. P. A., Maislin, G., Mullington, J. M., and Dinges, D. F. (2003). The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: Dose–response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep: Journal of Sleep and Sleep Disorders Research 26: 117126.Google Scholar
Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Morgan, A., Hobson, J. A., and Stickgold, R. 2002. Practice with sleep makes perfect: Sleep-dependent motor skill learning. Neuron 35: 205211.Google Scholar
Willingham, D. T. 2009. Three problems in the marriage of neuroscience and education. Cortex 45: 544545.Google Scholar
Willingham, D. T. 2012. Neurosci and educ.–5 days, 5 ways. Day 4: Confirm a construct. December 6. http://www.danielwillingham.com/daniel-willingham-science-and-education-blog/neurosci-educ-5-days-5-ways-day-4-confirm-a-construct (accessed May 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Wilson, C. L., Huang, J. L., and Kraiger, K. 2013. Personality and the analysis, design, and delivery of training. In Christiansen, N. D. and Tett, R. P., eds., Handbook of Personality at Work, 543564. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wulf, G., and Shea, C. H. 2002. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 185211.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×