Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T11:20:55.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The narrative of global justice and the grammar of law

from Part II - International labour law as a sphere of justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Yossi Dahan
Affiliation:
College of Law and Business, Ramat Gan
Hanna Lerner
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Faina Milman-Sivan
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

BC Health Services [2007] 2 S.C.R. 391.

Dunmore v. Ontario [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016.

LOCHNER v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser [2011] S.C.C. 20.

Hyde, Alan. “The Idea of the Idea of Labour Law” in Labor Law, edited by Davidov, Guy and Langille, Brian A., 88. OUP, 2011.Google Scholar
Kolben, Kevin. “A Development Approach to Trade and Labor Regimes.Wake Forest Law Review 45 (2010): 358.Google Scholar
La Hovary, Claire. “Showdown at the ILO? A Historical Perspective in the Employers’ Group’s 2012 Challenge to the Right to Strike.Industrial Law Journal 42 (2013): 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langille, Brian A. “Can We Rely on the ILO?Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal 13 (2007): 373390.Google Scholar
Langille, Brian A.Eight Ways to Think about International Labour Standards.” Journal of World Trade Law 31 (1997): 2753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langille, Brian A.The Freedom of Association Mess: How We Got into It and How We Can Get out of It.McGill Law Journal 54 (2009): 177215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langille, Brian A.Imagining Post Geneva Consensus Labour Law for Post Washington Consensus Development.Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 31, no. 3 (2010): 523552.Google Scholar
Langille, Brian A.Labour Law’s Theory of Justice” in The Idea of Labour Law, edited by Davidov, Guy and Langille, Brian. OUP, 2011.Google Scholar
Langille, Brian A.What Is International Labour Law for?Law and Ethics of Human Rights 3 (2009): 4782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langille, Brian A.Why the Right/Freedom Distinction Matters to Labour Lawyers – and All Canadians.” Dalhousie Law Journal 34 (2011): 143164.Google Scholar
Langille, Brian A. and Oliphant, Benjamin J.. “From the Frying Pan to the Fire: Fraser and the Shift from International Law to International ‘Thought’ in Charter Cases.Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal 16 (2012): 191234.Google Scholar
Maupain, Francis. “The ILO Regular Supervisory System: A Model in Crisis.” The International Organizations Law Review 10 (2013): 125126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Creating Capabilities: the Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C.The Supreme Court 2006 Term. Forward: Constitutions and Capabilities: ‘Perception’ Against Lofty Formalism.Harvard Law Review 121, no. 4 (2007): 997.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf, 1999.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. “Human Rights and the Limits of Law.Cardozo Law Review 27 (2006): 2913.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Servais, Jean. International Labour Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. “Responsibility and Global Labor Justice.Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (2004): 365388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judgments

BC Health Services [2007] 2 S.C.R. 391.

Dunmore v. Ontario [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016.

LOCHNER v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser [2011] S.C.C. 20.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×