Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:26:32.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Robert Crosnoe  and
Tama Leventhal
Robert Crosnoe
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Tama Leventhal
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Debating Early Child Care
The Relationship between Developmental Science and the Media
 , pp. 160 - 165
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bazelon, E. (2007). The kids are alright: What the latest day-care study really found. Slate, March 27.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. (1988). Nonmaternal care in the first year of life and the security of infant-parent attachment. Child Development, 59, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, A., McCartney, K., Owen, M. T., & the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78, 681–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergmann, B. R. (1996). Saving our children from poverty: What the United States can learn from France. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Best, S. J., & McDermott, M. L. (2007, July). Measuring opinions vs. non-opinions: The case of the USA Patriot Act. The Forum, 5, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37(4), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milke, M. A. (2006). The changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Blau, D. M. (2001). The child care problem: An economic analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Booth, C. L., Clarke-Stewart, K., Vandell, D. L., McCartney, K., & Owen, M. T. (2002). Child care usage and mother infant “quality time.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61, 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, R., Elder, G. H., & Costello, E. (1996). Developmental science. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherlin, A. (2009). The marriage-go-round. The state of marriage and the family today. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke-Stewart, A., & Allhusen, V. D. (2005). What we know about childcare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1989). Infant day care: Maligned or malignant? American Psychologist, 44(2), 266–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohany, S., & Sok, E. (2007). Trends in labor force participation of married mothers with infants. Monthly Labor Review, February. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2007/02/art2full.pdf.Google Scholar
Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Crosnoe, R., & Cavanagh, S. (2010). Families with children and adolescents: A review, critique, and future agenda. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosnoe, R., Leventhal, T., Wirth, R. J., Pierce, K. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Family socioeconomic status and consistent environmental stimulation in early childhood. Child Development, 81(3), 972–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosnoe, R., Prickett, K. C., Smith, C., & Cavanagh, S. (2014). Changes in young children’s family structures and child care arrangements. Demography, 51(2), 459–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, H. T. O., & Nutley, S. M. (2008). Learning more about how research-based knowledge gets used: Guidance in the development of new empirical research. New York: William T. Grant Foundation.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, D. V., Kaid, L. L., Williams, A. P., & Trammell, K. D. (2005). War on the Web: The immediate news framing of Gulf War II. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, G. J., & the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2003). Modeling the impacts of child care quality on children’s preschool cognitive development. Child Development, 74, 1454–1475.Google ScholarPubMed
Duncan, G. J., Huston, A. C., & Weisner, T. S. (2007). Higher ground: New hope for the working poor and their children. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K. A., & Ludwig, J. (2004). The endogeneity problem in developmental studies. Research in Human Development, 1, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunifon, R., & Wethington, E. (Eds.). (2012). Research for the public good: Applying the methods of translational research to improve human health and well-being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Eisinger, R. M., Veenstra, L. R., & Koehn, J. P. (2007). What media bias? Conservative and liberal labeling in major US newspapers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projects of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folbre, N. (2007). Valuing children: Rethinking the economics of the family, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, B., Kagan, S., Loeb, S., & Chang, H. (2004). Child care quality: Centers and home settings that serve poor families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershoff, E. T., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Zelli, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A. (2010). Parent discipline practices in an international sample: Associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child Development, 81, 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. A., Kaestner, R., & Korenman, S. (2008). Child care and work absences: Tradeoffs by type of care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, W., Gayer, T., Phillips, D., & Dawson, B. (2005). The effects of universal pre-K on cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 41, 872–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossman, A. S. (1981). Working mothers and their children. Monthly Labor Review, 104, 49–54.Google Scholar
Guensberg, C. (2001). Bully factories? A behind the scenes look at how researchers’ disagreements, simplistic and sensational coverage and a host of other problems clouded public understanding of a major study of child care. American Journalism Review, 23, 50–55.Google Scholar
Gunnoe, M. L., & Mariner, C. L. (1997). Toward a developmental-contextual model of the effects of parental spanking on children’s aggression. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 151(8), 768–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900–1902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofferth, S. (1996). Child care in the United States today. The Future of Children, 6, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huston, A. C. (2008). From research to policy and back. Child Development, 79, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Labor Organization. (2015). Maternity and paternity at work: Law and practice across the world. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Kam, C. D. (2010). Us against them: Ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laughlin, L. (2013). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements, Spring 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. G. (2004). Framing obesity: The evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Press/Politics, 9, 56–75.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. G., & Borkland, T. A. (2004). Guns, Hollywood, and school safety: Defining the school-shooting problem across public arenas. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1193–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibowitz, A., Klerman, J. A., & Waite, L. J. (1992). Employment of new mothers and child care choice: Differences by children’s age. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, G. M., Kisker, E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., Brooks-Gunn, J., Chazan-Cohen, R., Tarullo, L. B., Schochet, P. Z., Brady-Smith, C., Fuligni, A. S., Paulsell, D., & Vogel, C. (2005). The effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-year-old children and their parents: Lesson for policy and programs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 885–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, J., & Phillips, D. (2007). The benefits and costs of Head Start. SRCD Social Policy Reports, 21, 3–18.Google Scholar
McCartney, K., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, A., Bub, K. L., Owen, M. T., & Belsky, J. (2010). Testing a series of causal propositions relating time in child care to children’s externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLanahan, S. (2004). Children and the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrissey, T. W. (2008). Familial factors associated with the use of multiple child care arrangements. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61(04), 1040–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). Early child care and children’s development prior to school entry: Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005a). Child care and child development: Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005b). Early child care and children’s development in the primary grades: Follow-up results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 537–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padavic, I., & Reskin, B. F. (2002). Women and men at work, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, R. D. (2013). Future families: Diverse forms, rich possibilities. New York: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2009). Newspapers face a challenging calculus: Online growth, but print losses are bigger. Washington, DC: Author. http://www.pewresearch.org/2009/02/26/newspapers-face-a-challenging-calculus.Google Scholar
Phillips, D., & Adams, G. (2001). Child care and our youngest children. Future of Children, 11, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Differential susceptibility to parenting and quality child care. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 379–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, S.H. 1984. Children and the elderly: Divergent paths for America’s dependents. Demography, 21, 435–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralli, T. (2005). Who’s a looter? In storm’s aftermath, pictures kick up a different kind of tempest. New York Times, September 5, 2005.Google Scholar
Rasinski, K. A. (1989). The effect of question wording on public support for government spending. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean In: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Alfred a Knopf.Google Scholar
Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarr, S. (1998). American child care today. American Psychologist, 53, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slack, K. S., Magnuson, K. A., Berger, L. M., Yoo, J., Coley, R. L., Dunifon, R., & Osborne, C. (2007). Family economic well-being following the 1996 welfare reform: Trend data from five non-experimental panel studies. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 698–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In Saris, W. E. & Sniderman, P. M. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133–65). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Straus, M. A., Douglas, E.M., & Medeiros, R. A. (2013). The primordial violence: Spanking children, psychological development, violence, and crime. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, M. A., Sugarman, D. B., & Giles-Sims, J. (1997). Spanking by parents and subsequent antisocial behaviour of children. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 151, 761–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. A., & Nelson, C. A. (2001). Developmental science and the media: Early brain development. American Psychologist, 56(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Labor Women’s Bureau. (2014). Quick statistics on women workers. http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/QS-womenwork2010.htm.Google Scholar
Vandell, D. L., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., Steinberg, L., Vandergrift, N., & the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. Child Development, 81, 737–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandell, D. L., & Corasaniti, M. A. (1990). Variations in early child care: Do they predict subsequent social, emotional, and cognitive differences? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldfogel, J. (2001). International policies toward parental leave and child care. Future of Children, 11, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldfogel, J. (2006). What children need. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watamura, S. E., Donzella, B., Alwin, J., & Gunnar, M. R. (2003). Morning‐to‐afternoon increases in cortisol concentrations for infants and toddlers at child care: Age differences and behavioral correlates. Child Development, 74, 1006–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zedlewski, S. R. (2002). Family economic resources in the post-reform era. Future of Children, 12(1), 121–146.Google ScholarPubMed
Zigler, E., Gilliam, W. S., & Jones, S. M. (2006). A vision for universal preschool education. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Robert Crosnoe, University of Texas, Austin, Tama Leventhal, Tufts University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Debating Early Child Care
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316144855.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Robert Crosnoe, University of Texas, Austin, Tama Leventhal, Tufts University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Debating Early Child Care
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316144855.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Robert Crosnoe, University of Texas, Austin, Tama Leventhal, Tufts University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Debating Early Child Care
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316144855.008
Available formats
×