Book contents
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Cheating, corruption, and concealment
- Part I Motivations for dishonesty
- Part II Justifying dishonesty
- Part III Influences on dishonesty
- Part IV Reducing dishonesty
- Book part
- Index
- References
Part IV - Reducing dishonesty
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Book contents
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Cheating, corruption, and concealment
- Part I Motivations for dishonesty
- Part II Justifying dishonesty
- Part III Influences on dishonesty
- Part IV Reducing dishonesty
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cheating, Corruption, and ConcealmentThe Roots of Dishonesty, pp. 231 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
References
Ahmed, A. M., & Salas, O. (2011). Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40 (3), 242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aveyard, M. E. (2014). A call to honesty: Extending religious priming of moral behavior to Middle Eastern Muslims. PloS One, 9(7), e99447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D., Naifeh, S. J., & Pate, S. (1978). Social desirability, religious orientation, and racial prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, C. T., & Navara, G. S. (2002). Morality play or playing morality?: Intrinsic religious orientation and socially desirable responding. Self and Identity, 1(1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, S. A., & Kraus, R. (2012). Liar, liar: Adolescent religiosity and lying to parents. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 8, 1–26.Google Scholar
Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhaime, E. (2014). Did religion facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperative societies? Unpublished master’s thesis.Google Scholar
Edelman, B.G. (2009). Red light states: Who buys online adult entertainment? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1):209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faith in flux: Changes in religious affiliation in the US. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2009. www.pewforum.org/2009/04/27/faith-in-flux/.Google Scholar
Francis, L. J., & Stubbs, M. T. (1987). Measuring attitudes towards Christianity: From childhood into adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 741–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, W. M. (2014). Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists. PloS one, 9(4), e92302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A.F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Trust and anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillings, V., & Joseph, S. (1996). Religiosity and social desirability: Impression management and self-deceptive positivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 1047–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halevy, R., Shalvi, S., & Verschuere, B. (2014). Being honest about dishonesty: Correlating self‐reports and actual lying. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol 1: Studies in deceit. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heaven, P. C., & Ciarrochi, J. (2007). Personality and religious values among adolescents: A three‐wave longitudinal analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 681–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepper, E. G., Gramzow, R. H., & Sedikides, C. (2010). Individual differences in self‐enhancement and self‐protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of personality, 78, 781–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, S. R., & Shariff, A. F. (2015). Religious prosociality: A meta-analysis. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Leak, G. K., & Fish, S. (1989). Religious orientation, impression management, and self-deception: Toward a clarification of the link between religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, D. K. (2010). (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the ‘Sunday Effect’ on pro-social behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 138–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Enders, C. K., Brion, S. L., & Jain, A. R. (2005). The varieties of religious development in adulthood: A longitudinal investigation of religion and rational choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (in press). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, R. F., Richardson, J. T., & Rambo, L. R. (1999). Religious conversion and personality change. Journal of Personality, 67, 1047–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, G. S. (2005). Cross-national correlations of quantifiable societal health with popular religiosity and secularism in the prosperous democracies. Journal of Religion & Society, 1, 7.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 383–388.Google Scholar
Pichon, I., Boccato, G., & Saroglou, V. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: The decline of violence in history and its causes. London, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Randolph-Seng, B., & Nielsen, M. E. (2007) Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, P. S. (1994). Religious devoutness, impression management, and personality functioning in college students. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, L. M., Neighbors, C., & Foster, D. W. (2013, April 25). Priming effects of self-reported drinking and religiosity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shariff, A. F. (2011). Big gods are made for big groups: Commentary on Murray & Schloss. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Aknin, L. B. (2014). The emotional toll of Hell: Cross-national and experimental evidence for the negative well-being effects of Hell beliefs. PLoS One, 9(1), e85251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shariff, A. F., & Clark, B. A. M. (2015). Any God is better than no God: Belief in God is a more powerful cue of trust than religious affiliation. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.Google Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Supernatural agent concepts increase prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). Divergent effects of heaven and hell beliefs on national crime. PLoS One, 7(6), e39048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shariff, A. F., Willard, A., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2015). Priming God: A meta-analysis of religious priming with a focus on religious prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 1–22.Google Scholar
Storch, E. A., & Storch, J. B. (2001). Organizational, nonorganizational, and intrinsic religiosity and academic dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 88, 548–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, J. H., & Vogel, C. (2008). Religion and trust: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triandis, H. C. (2011). Culture and self-deception: A theoretical perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, D. E. (1997). The religious orientation scale: Review and meta-analysis of social desirability effects. Educational Psychology Measures, 57, 970–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vail, K. E., Arndt, J., & Abdollahi, A. (2012). Exploring the existential function of religion and supernatural agent beliefs among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1288–1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, P. J., Morris, R. J., Foster, J. E., & Hood, R. W. Jr (1986). Religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wink, P., Ciciolla, L., Dillon, M., & Tracy, A. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and personality: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 75, 1051–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Abrahamson, E., & Freedman, D. H. (2007). A perfect mess: The hidden benefits of disorder. New York, NY: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Altman, I., Taylor, D. A., & Wheeler, L. (1971). Ecological aspects of group behavior in social isolation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality traits and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23, 764–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, P., Chatterjee, P., & Sinha, J. (2012). Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23, 407–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, A., & Weiss, L. (1987). Social density and perceived control as mediators of crowding stress in high-density residential neighborhoods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 899.Google Scholar
Beaussart, M. L., Andrews, C. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creative liars: The relationship between creativity and integrity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 102, 994–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohns, V. K., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012). It hurts when I do this (or you do that): Posture and pain tolerance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boles, T. L., Croson, R. T. A., & Murnighan, J. K. (2000). Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 235–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2015). Review and summary of research on the embodied effects of nonverbal expansiveness. Psychological Science, 26, 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, D. R., Hall, J. A., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Peterson, R., Phillips, D., Podolny, J., & Ridgeway, C. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Bringing status to the table – Attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, S., & Downes, J. J. (2000). Long live Proust: The odour-cued autobiographical memory bump. Cognition, 75, B41–B50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramwinckel, F. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! The effects of touching dirty objects on rewarding unethical subordinates as a function of a leader’s self-interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crank, J. P. (2003). Crime and justice in the context of resource scarcity. Crime, Law and Social Change, 39, 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2003). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Wilmuth, C., Yap, A. J., & Carney, D. R. (2015). Preparatory power posing affects job interview performance. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 100, 1286–1295.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1872/1904). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Murray (Original work published 1872).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. (1998). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. A., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doleac, J. L., & Sanders, N. J. (2013). Under the cover of darkness: How ambient light influences criminal activity. Working paper. Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Doop, M., Mohr, C., Folley, B., Brewer, W., & Park, S. (2006). Olfaction and memory. In Brewer, W., Castle, D., & Pantelis, C. (Eds.), Olfaction and the brain (pp. 65–82). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The accentuation bias: Money literally looms larger (and sometime smaller) to the powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguid, M. M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). Living large: The powerful overestimate their own height. Psychological Science, 23, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 391–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group.. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2013). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollwitzer, M., & Melzer, A. (2012). Macbeth and the joystick: Evidence for moral cleansing after playing a violent video game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1356–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Scott, K. S. (1996). Why do workers bite the hands that feed them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 111–155). Greenwich: CT JAI Press.Google Scholar
Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & Smith LeBeau, L. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harries, K. (2006). Property crimes and violence in United States: An analysis of the influence of population density. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 1, 24–34.Google Scholar
Helzer, Erik G., & Pizarro, David A. (2011). Dirty liberals!: Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22, 517–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsh, J. B., Galinsky, A. D., & Zhong, C. B. (2011). Drunk, powerful, and in the dark: How general processes of disinhibition produce both prosocial and antisocial behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirshleifer, D., & Shumway, T. (2003). Good day sunshine: Stock returns and the weather. Journal of Finance, 58, 1009–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, R. W., Hendriks, M., & Aarts, H. (2005). Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychological Science, 16, 689–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, C. C., & Pugh, M. D. (1993). Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: A meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies. Criminal Justice Review, 18, 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science, 22, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inesi, M. E. (2010). Power and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F., & Donnellan, M. B. (2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgements? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (2009). Creating a larger role for environmental psychology: The reasonable person model as an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Auditing, 20, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681–1685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, A. P., & Baer, M. (2014). Get up, stand up: The effects of a non-sedentary workspace on information elaboration and group performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 910–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, C., & Haslam, S. A. (2010). The relative merits of lean, enriched, and empowered offices: An experimental examination of the impact of workspace management strategies on well-being and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 158–172.Google ScholarPubMed
Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, M. J., Meier, B., & Keefer, L. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N. (2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleansing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCallum, R., Rusbult, C. E., Hong, G. K., Walden, T. A., & Schopler, J. (1979). Effects of resource availability and importance of behavior on the experience of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1304–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, J. J. III (2004). Establishing the statistical relationship between population size and UCR crime rate: Its impact and implications. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. A., & Moss, M. K. (1976). Environmental influences on aggression: The effects of darkness and proximity of victim. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, L. E., Streamer, L., Huang, L., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Stand tall, but don’t put your feet up: Universal and culturally-specific effects of expansive postures on power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 965–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Cote, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4086–4091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Compliant sinners, obstinate saints: How power and self-focus determine the effectiveness of (un)ethical social influences. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 636–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranehill, E., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Leiberg, S., Sul, S., & Weber, R. (2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effects on hormones and risk taking in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26, 653–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotton, J. (1983). Affective and cognitive consequences of malodorous pollution. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38, 213–228.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, J. J., Johnson, D. A. Jr, Morris, D., & Dyrnes, S. (1993). An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J., Brush, C., & Lublin, S. (1965). Some aspects of deindividuation: Identification and conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 356–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Bos, K., Van Lange, P. A. M., Lind, E. A., Venhoeven, L. A., Beudeker, D. A., Cramwinckel, F. M., … Van der Laan, J. (2011). On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: Because of the prosocial nature of people behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 791–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Lowe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Redden, J. P., & Rahinel, R. (2013). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological Science, 24, 1714–1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisfeld, G. E., & Beresford, J. M. (1982). Erectness of posture as an indicator of dominance or success in humans. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, C. M., Altman, I., & Brown, B. B. (1992). A transactional approach to interpersonal relations: Physical environment, social context and temporal qualities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willer, R., Youngreen, R., Troyer, L., & Lovaglia, M. (2012). How do the powerful attain status? The roots of legitimate power inequalities. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yap, A. J., Mason, M. F., & Ames, D. R. (2013). The powerful size others down: The link between power and estimates of others’ size. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yap, A. J., Wazlawek, A. S., Lucas, B. J., Cuddy, A. C., & Carney, D. R. (2013). The ergonomics of dishonesty: The effect of incidental posture on stealing, cheating, and traffic violations. Psychological Science, 24, 2281–2289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, C. B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 311–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, C. B., & House, J. (2012). Hawthorne revisited: Organizational implications of the physical work environment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral Study of Obedience.” American Psychologist, 19, 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocchiaro, P., & Zimbardo, P. (under review). On the dynamics of “productive disobedience”: Experimental investigations of defying unjust authority.Google Scholar
Bocchiaro, P., Zimbardo, P. G., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2012). To defy or not to defy: An experimental study of the dynamics of disobedience and whistle-blowing. Social Influence, 7, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheetham, M., Pedroni, A. F., Antley, A., Slater, M., & Jäncke, L. (2009). Virtual Milgram: Empathic concern or personal distress? Evidence from functional MRI and dispositional measures. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dambrun, M., & Vatiné, E. (2010). Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 760–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromm, E. (1963). Disobedience as a psychological and moral problem. In Urquhart, C. (Ed.), A matter of life (pp. 97–105). London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Giampaglia, G., & Roccato, M. (2002). La scala di autoritarismo di destra di Altemeyer: Un’analisi con il modello di Rasch per la costruzione di una versione italiana [The Altemeyer’s right-wing authoritarianism scale: An analysis using Rasch model for the construction of an Italian version]. TPM, 9, 93–111.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, A. J. (2007). Ethical issues in behavioral research: Basic and applied perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mixon, D. (1972). Instead of deception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 2, 145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, B, Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 76–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Packer, D. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 301–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pozzi, M., Fattori, F., Bocchiaro, P., & Alfieri, S. (2014). Do the right thing! A study on social representation of obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (1998). Social conflict. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 470–503). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., … Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE, 1, e39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeigler-Hill, V., Southard, A. C., Archer, L. M., & Donohoe, P. L. (2013). Neuroticism and negative affect influence the reluctance to engage in destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
References marked with an asterisk refer to studies included in the meta-analysis.
Ansarra, R., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Hines, A., Fleck, R., Cole, L., & Belarde, D. (2011). Augmenting ACID with affective details to assess credibility. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 3, 141–158. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_11.Google Scholar
Bagley, J., & Manelis, L. (1979). Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, G. W. (1981). A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 243–248. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00493.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679. Doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.5.669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bembibre, J., & Higueras, L. (2011). Differential effectiveness of the cognitive interview in a simulation of a testimony. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 17, 473–489. Doi 10.1080/10683160903321540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bembibre, J., & Higueras, L. (2012). Comparative analysis of true and false statements with the source monitoring model and the cognitive interview: Special features of the false accusation of innocent people. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 913–928. Doi 10.1080/1068316X.2011.589387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, A., & Jameson, A. (1999). Interpreting symptoms of cognitive load in speech input. In Kay, J. (Ed.), User modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, UM99, Vienna. New York: Springer Wien New York.Google Scholar
Bull, R. (2010). The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 5–24. Doi: 10.1348/014466509X440160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Colwell, K., Hiscock, C. K., & Memon, A. (2002). Interview techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287–300. Doi: 10.1002/acp.788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J. (2007). Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4, 167–180. Doi 10.1002/jip.73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., & Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement of visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38, 438–445. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.38.3.438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory and Cognition, 33, 727–733. doi:10.3758/BF03195338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1997). Deception, lying, and demeanor. In Halpern, D. F. & Voiskounsky, A. E. (Eds.), States of mind: American and post-Soviet perspectives on contemporary issues in psychology (pp. 93–105). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. P. (2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 25–38 Doi: 10.1348/135532509X441891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques in investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Fisher, R., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 16–19. Doi: 10.1177/0963721410396826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiselman, R. E., & Callot, R. (1990). Reverse and forward order recall of script based text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141–144. doi 10.1002/acp.2350040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 723–739. Doi: 10.1002/acp.1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., & Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 651–658. Doi: 10.3758/BF03211385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Granhag, P. A., Andersson, L. O., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals’ beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103–119. doi/10.1348/135532504322776889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200. Doi: 10.1080/10683160701645181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granhag, P. A., & Knieps, M. (2011). Episodic future thought: Illuminating the trademarks of forming true and false intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 274–280. Doi 10.1002/acp1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Jonsson, A. C. (2003). Partners in crime: How liars in collusion betray themselves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 848–868. Doi: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.2003.tb01928.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L. A., Willén, R., & Hartwig, M. (2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 341–355. doi. 10.1111/j.2044–8333.2012.02047.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 213–227. Doi: 10/10683160600750264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619. Doi: org/10.1007/s10979-006-9053-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez-Fernaud, E., & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1997). The cognitive interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55–68. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099–0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61, 760–771. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376. Doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associate retrieval processes in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 24, 103–109. Doi: 10.3758/BF03197276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knieps, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2013a). Back to the future: Asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147, 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knieps, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2013b). Repeated visits to the future: Asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions. International Journal of Advances in Psychology, 2, 93–102.Google Scholar
Köhnken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. In Semin, G. R. & Fiedler, K. (Eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 257–282). London, Great Britain: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement Validity Analysis and the “detection of the truth.” In Granhag, P. A. & Strömwall, L. A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 41–63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, G. L. J., Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Waller, B. (2012). Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: The benefits of asking unanticipated questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 107–114. Doi: 10.1002/acp.2879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., Vernham, Z., & Fisher, R. (2015). You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 129–146. Doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leins, D., Fisher, R., & Vrij, A. (2012). Drawing on liars’ lack of cognitive flexibility: Detecting deception through varying report modes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 601–607. Doi 10.1002/acp.2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leins, D., Fisher, R. P., Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Mann, S. (2011). Using sketch-drawing to induce inconsistency in liars. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 253–265. Doi 10.1348/135532510X501775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Warmelink, L., & Forrester, D. (2012). Windows to the soul? Deliberate eye contact as a cue to deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36, 205–215. Doi: 10.1007/s10919-012-0132-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S., Vrij, A., Shaw, D., Leal, S., Ewans, S., Hillman, J., Granhag, P. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2013). Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 324–340. Doi 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02055.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 16, 340–372. Doi:10.1037/a0020518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? SCAN as a lie detection tool. Law & Human Behavior, 36, 68–76. Doi: 10.1007/s10979-011-9264-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171. Doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos af Hjelmsäter, E., Öhman, L., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2014). Mapping deception in adolescents: Eliciting cues to deceit through an unanticipated spatial drawing task. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 179–188. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02068.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. (1994). Supervisory control of action and thought selection. In Weiskrantz, L., Baddeley, A., & Alan, D. (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 171–187). New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. J, Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Hillman, J. (2013). Expect the unexpected? Variations in question type elicit cues to deception in joint interviewer contexts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 336–343. Doi: 10.1002/acp.2911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Knieps, M., & Vrij, A. (2013). True and false intentions: Asking about the past to detect lies about the future. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 19, 673–685. Doi 10.1080/1068316x.2013.793333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., & Hughes, C. J. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1755–1762. Doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1555.Google ScholarPubMed
Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In Raskin, D. C. (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Suckle-Nelson, J. A., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Florence, S., Youschak, K. E., & Duarte, A. (2010). Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): Replication and gender differences. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 23–30.Google Scholar
Tedeschini, J. (2012). Overcoming roadblocks to reform. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 134–135. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vredeveldt, A., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2011). Eye closure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualisation. Memory and Cognition, 39, 1253–1263. Doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0098-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41. Doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, second edition. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Vrij, A. (2014). Interviewing to detect deception. European Psychologist, 19, 184–195. Doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection. In Granhag, P. A., Vrij, A., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches (pp. 205–229). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142. Doi: org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 110–117. doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Towards a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 28–32. Doi: 10.1177/0963721410391245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. B. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. Doi: 10.1177/1529100610390861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159–166. Doi 10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2011). A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: Verbal cues and detection accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 212–218. Doi 10.1002/acp.1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 579–594. Doi 10.1080/10683160902776843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Warmelink, L., Granhag, P. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2010). Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 587–594. Doi: 10.1002/acp/1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265. Doi 10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2010). “Look into my eyes”: Can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? Psychology, Crime, & Law, 16, 327–348. doi 10.1080/10683160902776843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Is anyone out there? Drawings as a tool to detect deception in occupations interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 377–388. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2010.498422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Jundi, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Have you been there before? The effect of experience and question expectedness on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica, 141, 178–183. doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, L. A., Veinott, E. S., Meissner, C. M., Fallon, C., & Mueller, S. T. (2010). Field Training and Testing of Interview and Elicitation Methods (Final Report prepared under Contract W91CRB-09-C-0082 for US ARMY REDCOM Acquisition Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD). Fairborn, OH: Klein Associates Division of Applied Research Associates.Google Scholar