AdamsJr., R. B., Rule, N. O., FranklinJr., R. G., Wang, E., Stevenson, M. T., Yoshikawa, S., Nomura, M., Sato, W., Kveraga, K., & Ambady, N.. (2010). Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(1), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amit, E., Algom, D., & Trope, Y. (2009). Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(3), 400–15.Google ScholarPubMed

Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk‐taking. European Journal of Social Psychology 34(6), 511–36.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science 23(7), 764–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andone, C. (2013). Argumentation in Context. Vol. 5: Argumentation in Political Interviews. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2002). From “blame by praise” to “praise by blame”: Analysis of vocal patterns in ironic communication. International Journal of Psychology 37(5), 266–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6), 793–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1961). The meaning of a word. In Urmson, J. O. & Warnock, G. J. (eds.), Philosophical Papers of J. L. Austin (pp. 23–43). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Averbeck, J. M., & Hample, D. (2008). Ironic message production: How and why we produce ironic messages. Communication Monographs 75(4), 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(4), 609–22.Google ScholarPubMed

Barlow, J. M., Kerlin, J. R., & Pollio, H. R. (1971). Training Manual for Identifying Figurative Language: Metaphor Research Group. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Barr, D. J. (1999). A theory of dynamic coordination for conversational interaction. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language 46(2), 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barr, D. J., (2005). Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use. In Colston, H. L. & Katz, A. N. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 21–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. (eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blankenship, K. L. (2005). The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blankenship, K. L. (2006). Rhetorical question use and resistance to persuasion: An attitude strength analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 25(2), 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blankenship, K. L, & Craig, T. Y. (2006). Rhetorical question use and resistance to persuasion: An attitude strength analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blankenship, K. L., & Holtgraves, T. (2005). The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt & Company.Google Scholar

Boerger, M. A. (2005). Variations in figurative language use as a function of mode of communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolinger, D. (1950). Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 6, 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2010). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 118(1), 123–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13(2), 185–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosco, F. M., Vallana, M., & Bucciarelli, M. (2012). The inferential chain makes the difference between familiar and novel figurative expressions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24(5), 525–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bott, L., & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3), 437–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108(3), 624–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391 (6669), 756–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science 247(4938), 44–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology 22(1), 72–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowes, A., & Katz, A. (2011). When sarcasm stings. Discourse Processes 48(4), 215–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boylan, J., & Katz, A. N. (2013). Ironic expression can simultaneously enhance and dilute perception of criticism. Discourse Processes 50(3), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(6), 1040–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. (1958). Words and Things. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Brown, R. W., Black, A. H., & Horowitz, A. E. (1955). Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50(3), 388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bryant, G. A. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes 47(7), 545–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, G. A. (2011). Verbal irony in the wild. Pragmatics & Cognition 19(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol 17(2), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, G. A., (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech 48(3), 257–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burg, A., O’Keefe, D., & Schaffer, J. (writers), & Ackerman, A. (director). (1997). The strike [television series episode]. In Berg, A., Schaffer, J., Seinfeld, J., Shapiro, G. & West, H. (producers), Seinfeld. Los Angeles, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.Google Scholar

Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the verbal irony procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26(3), 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgers, C. F., van Mulken, M. J. P., & Schellens, P. J. (2013). On irony, images and creativity: A corpus-analytic approach. In Veale, T., Feyaerts, K., & Forceville, C. J. (eds.), Creativity and the Agile Mind: A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Multifaceted Phenomenon (pp. 293–311). Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, Z. C., Caruso, E. M., & Bartels, D. M. (2012). Predicting premeditation: Future behavior is seen as more intentional than past behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(2), 227–32.Google ScholarPubMed

Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalising “metaphor” for applied linguistic research. In Low, G. & Cameron, L. (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, L. (2003). Advances in Applied Linguistics: Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. D., & Katz, A. N. (2012). Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes 49(6), 459–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canton, N., Gale, B., Kennedy, K., Marshall, F., & Spielberg, S. (producers) & Zemeckis, R. (director). (1985). Back to the Future [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance, and scalar implicature. In Carston, R. & Uchida, S. (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2011). Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition 3(02), 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280(5364), 747–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carter, R. (2004). Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Caruso, E. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2008). A wrinkle in time: Asymmetric valuation of past and future events. Psychological Science 19(8), 796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caruso, E. M., & Gino, F. (2011). Blind ethics: Closing one’s eyes polarizes moral judgments and discourages dishonest behavior. Cognition 118(2), 280–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caruso, E. M. & Shafir, E. (2006). Now that I think about it, I’m in the mood for laughs: Decisions focused on mood. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19(2), 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caruso, E. M., Waytz, A., & Epley, N. (2010). The intentional mind and the hot hand: Perceiving intentions makes streaks seem likely to continue. Cognition 116(1), 149–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caucci, G. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (2012). Social and paralinguistic cues to sarcasm. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 25(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chettih, S., Durgin, F. H., & Grodner, D. J. (2012). Mixing metaphors in the cerebral hemispheres: What happens when careers collide? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38(2), 295.Google ScholarPubMed

Clapton, E. P. (1977). Wonderful tonight. On Slowhand [vinyl recording]. London: RSO Records.Google Scholar

Claridge, C. (2011). Hyperbole in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1977). Inferences in comprehension. In Laberge, D. & Samuels, S. (eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension (pp. 245–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1983). Making sense of nonce sense. In Flores D’Arcais, G. B. & Jarvella, R. J. (eds.), The Process of Language Understanding (pp. 297–331). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1), 121–6.Google ScholarPubMed

Clark, H. H., (2007). On the pretense theory of irony. In Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (pp. 25–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A. K., Webber, B., & Sag, I. A. (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22(2), 245–58.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Claymore, . (2005). SBC/Yahoo! Wonderful Tonght [video file]. Available at: http://adland.tv/commercials/sbc-yahoo-wonderful-tonight-2005-030-usa.Google Scholar

Climie, E. A., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Eye gaze provides a window on children’s understanding of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development 9(3), 257–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009). Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry. Journal of Research in Personality 43(1), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (1997). “I’ve never seen anything like it”: Overstatement, understatement and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 12 (1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (1999). The pragmatic functions of rebuttal analogy. Metaphor and Symbol 14(4), 259–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2000a). “Dewey defeats Truman”: Interpreting ironic restatement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19(1), 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2000b). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition 8(2), 277–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2002a). Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 34(2), 111–42.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2002b). Pragmatic justifications for nonliteral gratitude acknowledgments: “Oh sure, anytime.” Metaphor and Symbol 17(3), 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2005). Social and cultural influences on figurative and indirect language. In Colston, H. & Katz, A. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 99–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2007). What figurative language development reveals about the mind. In A. C. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (eds.), Mental States, Vol. 2: Language and Cognitive Structure (pp. 191–212). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2008). A new look at common ground: Memory, egocentrism, and joint meaning. In I. Kecskes & J. Mey (eds.), Intention, Common Ground, and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer (pp. 151–88). New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2009). Figurative pragmatics: From structure to social status. In Turner, K. & Fraser, B. (eds.), Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey, a Festschrift (pp. 49–56). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2010). Irony, analogy and truth. In Nerlich, B. & Burkhardt, A. (eds.), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes (pp. 339–54). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2014). Complexities of pragmatic effects in blended figures: The case of metaphtonymy. Paper presented at the First International Symposium on Figurative Thought and Language, Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2015). Irony performance and perception: Motivations underlying use and comprehension. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Newcastle, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Brooks, E. N. (2008). Pragmatic effects of metonymy. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Connelly, C. (2004). Figurative language and composure display. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (1998). Analogy and irony: Rebuttal to “rebuttal analogy.” Metaphor and Symbol 13(1), 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol 17(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., (2007). A brief history of irony. In Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (pp. 3–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Jindrich, P. L. (2000). “Been there, done that”: Comprehending asyndeton. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Katz, A. N. (2005). Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27(4), 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Kinney, E. (2015). Producing figurative pragmatic effects: Endings justifying meanings. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Kodet, A. (2008). Embodiment in word meanings. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2004). Gender differences in verbal irony use. Metaphor and Symbol 19(4), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J. (1998). Contrast effects in the pragmatic accomplishments of irony and understatement. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., (2000a). Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics 32(11), 1557–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., (2000b). Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes 30(2), 179–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., & Peitz, S. L. (2000). See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Comprehension of phatic disbelief expressions. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88(4), 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corts, D. P. (2006). Factors characterizing bursts of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Discourse Studies 8(2), 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corts, D. P., & Meyers, K. (2002). Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31(4), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corts, D. P., & Pollio, H. R. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol 14(2), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulson, S. (2008a). Framing and blending in persuasive discourse. In Favretti, Rema Rossini (ed.), Frames, Corpora, and Knowledge Representation (pp. 33–42). Bologna: Bononia University Press.Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2008b). Metaphor comprehension and the brain. In Gibbs, R.W. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3–4), 175–96.Google Scholar

Coulson, S., (2005). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10), 1510–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Covington, M., & Curry, M. (2008). A brief history of putting lipstick on a pig. Time Magazine 172(9).Google Scholar

Cowan, A., David, L., & Seinfeld, J. (writers) & Cherones, T. (director). (1994). The opposite [television series episode]. In David, L., Shapiro, G., & West, H. (producers), Seinfeld. Los Angeles, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.Google Scholar

Craig, T. Y., & Blankenship, K. L. (2011). Language and persuasion: Linguistic extremity influences message processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30(3), 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2011). Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Vol. 28: Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cushing, H., D’Cruz, J., & Gay-Rees, J. (producers) & Banksy, (director). (2010). Exit Through the Gift Shop [motion picture]. London: Paranoid Pictures.Google Scholar

Dascal, M. (2003). Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

David, L., Seinfeld, J., Cowan, A. (writers), & Cherones, T. (director). (1994). The Opposite [television series episode]. In T. Gammill, M. Pross, & J. Seinfeld (producers), Seinfeld. Los Angelis, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.Google Scholar

De Neys, W., & Schaeken, W. (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load. Experimental Psychology 54(2), 128–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Saussure, L. (2013). Background relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 59, 178–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demorest, A., Silberstein, L., Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1983). Telling it as it isn’t: Children’s understanding of figurative language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1(2), 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning a social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language & Social Interaction 33(4), 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research 17(2), 171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epley, N., Caruso, E., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(5), 872–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(3), 327–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eugenides, J. (2011). The Marriage Plot. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar

Fass, D. (1991). Met*: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics 17(1), 49–90.Google Scholar

Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science 20(4), 502–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2), 133–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fauconnier, G., (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fausey, C. M., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(5), 644–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fausey, C. M., & Matlock, T. (2011). Can grammar win elections? Political Psychology 32(4), 563–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldhaus, R. O., & Honeck, R. P. (1989). The conceptual basis of graded categories. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(3), 271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferré, G. (2014). Multimodal hyperbole. Multimodal Communication 3(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2), 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filik, R. (2008). Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 106(2), 1038–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J. (2014). Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40(3), 811–28.Google Scholar

Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010). The online processing of written irony. Cognition 116(3), 421–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26(2), 237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forgas, J. P., & Williams, K. D. (2001). The Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology: Social Influence—Direct and Indirect Processes. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Foster, W. (writer), & Freleng, F. (director). (1955). Hare brush [television series episode]. In Selzer, E. (producer), Looney Tunes. Los Angeles, CA: Warner Brothers.Google Scholar

Friesen, G., & Meyer, A. (producers), & Hughes, J. (director). (1985). The Breakfast Club [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar

Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4), 531–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Furthman, J. (producer), & von Sternberg, J. (director). (1957). Jet Pilot [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: RKO Radio Pictures.Google Scholar

Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989a). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25(3), 203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fussell, S. R., (1989b). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology 19(6), 509–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(3), 453–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Ena Inesi, M., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science 17(12), 1068–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(6), 1450–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garnham, A. (1982). Testing psychological theories about inference making. Memory & Cognition 10(4), 341–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gehring, W. J., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience 3(5), 516–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelbart, L., & Marks, L. (writers), & Cooper, J. (director). (1973). The incubator [television series episode]. In Gelbart, L., Metcalfe, B., & Reynolds, G. (producers), M*A*S*H. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox Television.Google Scholar

Gerrig, R. J. (1989). Suspense in the absence of uncertainty. Journal of Memory and Language 28(6), 633–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1981a). Memory for requests in conversation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(6), 630–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1981b). Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(4), 431–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9(3), 524.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1986a). Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes 7, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1986b). What makes some indirect speech acts conventional? Journal of Memory and Language 25, 181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1987). Memory for requests in conversation revisited. American Journal of Psychology 100, 179–91.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1993). Process and products in making sense of tropes. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1999). Speakers’ intuitions and pragmatic theory. Cognition 69, 355–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Gibbs, R. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol 15, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 457–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2003a). Embodiment and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language 84, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibbs, R. (2003b). Embodied standing and the psychological semantics of stand. In Newman, J. (ed.), The Linguistics of Standing, Lying, and Sitting. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2005). Review of M. Dascal “Interpretation and understanding.” Pragmatics & Cognition 13, 405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2006a). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2006b). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language 21, 434–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2007). Experimental tests of figurative meaning construction. In G. Radden, K-M. Kopcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 19–32). Amsterdam, Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2011a). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48, 529–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2011b). Multiple constraints on theories of metaphor. Discourse Processes 48, 375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. (2012). Are ironic acts deliberate. Journal of Pragmatics 44(1), 104–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Bryant, G. A. (2008). Striving for optimal relevance when answering questions. Cognition 106(1), 345–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibbs, R. W., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. L. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony? International Journal of Humor Research, 27(4), 575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (2002). The risks and rewards of ironic communication. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (eds.), Say Not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication (pp. 181–94). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., (2006). Figurative language. In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd ed. (pp. 835–62). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., (2007a). Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. New York: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R., (2007b). Psycholinguistic aspects of phraseology: American tradition. In Burger, H., Dobrovolskij, D., Kuhn, P., & Norrick, N.. (eds.), Phraseologie/Phraseology: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Izett, C. D. (2005). Irony as persuasive communication. In H. Colston & A. Katz (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 131–52). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Kearney, L. R. (1994). When parting is such sweet sorrow: The comprehension and appreciation of oxymora. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & McCarrell, N. S. (1990). Why boys will be boys and girls will be girls: Understanding colloquial tautologies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19(2), 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Mueller, R. A. G. (1988). Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts. Discourse Processes 11(1), 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7), 1189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., Leggitt, J. S., & Turner, E. A. (2002). What’s special about figurative language in emotional communication? In Frussel, S. R. (ed.), The Verbal Communication of Emotions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 125–49). Oxon, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28(5), 576–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language 21(3), 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R., (2011). Coupling of metaphoric cognition and communication: A reply to Deirdre Wilson. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(4); available at: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iprg.2011.8.issue-4/iprg.2011.027/iprg.2011.027.xml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Van Orden, G. (2012). Pragmatic choice in conversation. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gil, J. M. (2011). Relevance theory and unintended transmission of information. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giora, R. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., Levi, N. A., & Sabah, H. (2005). On negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes 39(1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giora, R., Livnat, E., Fein, O., Barnea, A., Zeiman, R., & Berger, I. (2013). Negation generates nonliteral interpretations by default. Metaphor and Symbol 28(2), 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3), 558–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review 97(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, D., Medjuck, J., & Reitman, I. (producers), & Reitman, I. (director). (1981). Stripes [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar

Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In Gibbs, R. W. & Steen, G. J. (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 (pp. 101–24). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Advances in Discourse Processes Series. Vol. 17: Structures and Procedures of Implicit Knowledge. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5), 1029–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293(5537), 2105–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greene, S. B., Gerrig, R. J., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language 33(4), 511–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. Foundations of Language 4, 225–42.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Speech Acts. Vol. 3: Syntax and Semantics (pp. 225–42). New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(1), 111–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108(4), 841–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. (2006). The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology 71(2), 148–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450(7169), 557–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4), 447–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanna, S. (2011). Awareness in metaphor understanding: “The Lingering of the Literal.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 65–82.Google Scholar

Harris, M. Friel, B., Mickelson, , & Rett, N. (2006). Attribution of discourse goals for using concrete- and abstract-tenor metaphors and similes with or without discourse context. Journal of Pragmatics 38(6), 863–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes 36(3), 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, R. J., & Mosier, N. J. (1999). Memory for metaphors and similes in discourse. Discourse Processes 28(3), 257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., & Sun, P. (2011). Beastly: What makes animal metaphors offensive? Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30(3), 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helzer, E. G., Connor-Smith, J. K., & Reed, M. A. (2009). Traits, states, and attentional gates: Temperament and threat relevance as predictors of attentional bias to social threat. Anxiety, Stress & Coping 22(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Helzer, E. G., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science 22(4), 517–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hilpert, M. (2010). An empirical approach to the use and comprehension of mixed metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 8(1), 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsh, J. B. (2010). The weight of being: Psychological perspectives on the existential moment. New Ideas in Psychology 28(1), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science 23(6), 578–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holroyd, Clay B. & Coles, Michael G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holtgraves, T. (1997). Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(3), 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honeck, R. P. (1997). A Proverb in Mind: The Cognitive Science of Proverbial Wit and Wisdom. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition 96(2), 127–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition 59(1), 91–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hsieh, S. C. (2006). A corpus-based study on animal expressions in Mandarin Chinese and German. Journal of Pragmatics 38(12), 2206–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science 22(1), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion 23(4), 714–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion 9(3), 435–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Inesi, M. E. (2010). Power and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 112(1), 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inesi, M. E., Botti, S., Dubois, D., Rucker, D., & Galinski, A. D. (2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science 22(8), 1042–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishida, Y., & Abe, J. (2010). Is the victim of irony identified by echoic mention? Shinrigaku Kenkyu: The Japanese Journal of Psychology 80(6), 485–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(11), 1161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, B., Young, A., Young, M., Williams, C., & Rudd, P. (1980). Back in Black. On Back in Black [CD]. New York: Albert/Atlantic Records.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. G., & Malgady, R. G. (1979). Some cognitive aspects of figurative language: Association and metaphor. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8(3), 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, S. K., Hirsh, J. B., & Chasteen, A. L. (2010). Your mistakes are mine: Self-other overlap predicts neural response to observed errors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(1), 229–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(2), 410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katz, A. N. (1982). Metaphoric relationships: The role of feature saliency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11(4), 283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, A. N. (2005). Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language. In Colston, H. L. & Katz, A. N. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 183–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Katz, A. N., Blasko, D. G., & Kazmerski, V. A. (2004). Saying what you don’t mean: Social influences on sarcastic language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13(5), 186–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, A. N., Lenhardt, M., & Mitchell, K. (2007). On acknowledging thanks for performing a favor. Metaphor and Symbol 22(3), 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, A. N., & Pexman, P. M. (1997). Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol 12(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2007). Synergic concepts in the bilingual mind. In Kecskes, I. & Albertazzi, L. (eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Bilingualism (pp. 29–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kecskes, I., & Mey, J. (2008). Mouton Series in Pragmatics. Vol. 4: Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I., & Papp, T. (2003). How to demonstrate the conceptual effect of L2 on L1? Methods and techniques In Cook, V. (ed.), Effects of the Second Language on the First (pp. 247–65). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, E. L., & Li, C. N. (1976). Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and Topic (pp. 247–301). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonaldIII, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, Cameron S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303(5660), 1023–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keysar, B. (1994). Discourse context effects: Metaphorical and literal interpretations. Discourse Processes 18(3), 247–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keysar, B. (2007). Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(1). Available at: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iprg.2007.4.issue-1/ip.2007.004/ip.2007.004.xml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keysar, B. (2008). Egocentric processes in communication and miscommunication. In Kecskes, I. & Mey, J. (eds.), Mouton Series in Pragmatics. Vol. 4: Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer (pp. 277–96). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 11(1), 32–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 39(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language 34(1), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1999). Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics 31(12), 1559–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keysar, B., & Henly, A. S. (2002). Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness. Psychological Science 13(3), 207–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kimmel, M. (2008). Properties of cultural embodiment: Lessons from the anthropology of the body. In Frank, R. M., Dirven, R., Ziemke, T., & Bernardez, E. E. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics Research: Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness (pp. 77–108). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kimmel, M. (2009). Metaphors of the EU constitutional debate: Ways of charting discourse coherence in a complex metaphor field. Metaphorik.de 17, 49–100.Google Scholar

Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics 42(1), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopp, R. R. (1995). Metaphor Therapy: Using Client-Generated Metaphors in Psychotherapy. Bristol, PA: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar

Kotthoff, H. (2002). Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality: Double or contrastive perspectivation in conversation. In Kallmeyer, V. (ed.), Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse (pp. 201–30). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kotthoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35(9), 1387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kovaz, D., Kreuz, R. J., & Riordan, M. A. (2013). Distinguishing sarcasm from literal language: Evidence from books and blogging. Discourse Processes 50(8), 598–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kovecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kowatch, K., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Irony comprehension in action: A new test of processing for verbal irony. Discourse Processes 50(5), 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science 21(11), 1716–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991a). Constructing shared communicative environments. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 172–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauss, R. M., (1991b). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others’ knowledge in reference. Social Cognition 9(1), 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuz, R. J. (2000). The production and processing of verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol 15(1–2), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(4), 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuz, R. J., Kassler, M. A., Coppenrath, L., & McLain Allen, B. (1999). Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 31(12), 1685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(2), 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., & Church, M. B. (1991a). On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6(3), 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., (1991b). On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6(3), 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(1), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kurtz, G. (producer), & Lucas, G. (director). (1977). Star Wars: A New Hope [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Lucasfilm & Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.Google Scholar

Kwapil, J. M., Brey, V. A., & Colston, H. L. (2006). Register violations as a form of verbal irony. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamm, R. W. (1970). Does anybody really know what time it is? On The Chicago Transit Authority [CD]. Chicago: Columbia Records.Google Scholar

Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(2), 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34(2), 191–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, E. (1964). Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal abuse. In Lenneberg, E. (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language (pp. 23–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lee, C. J., & Katz, A. N. (1998). The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 13(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legowski, T., & Brownlee, K. (2001). Working with metaphor in narrative therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy 12(1), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitt, H., Korman, Y., & Angus, L. (2000). A metaphor analysis in treatments of depression: Metaphor as a marker of change. Counselling Psychology Quarterly 13(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Social cognitive neuroscience. Handbook of Social Psychology. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001005/full.Google Scholar

Link, K. E., & Kreuz, R. J. (2005). Do men and women differ in their use of nonliteral language when they talk about emotions? In Colston, H. & Katz, A.(eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 99–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Litovkina, A. T. (2009). Law is hell: Death and the afterlife in American lawyer jokes. Acta Juridica Hungarica 50(3), 311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Litovkina, A. T. (2011). “Where there’s a will there’s a lawyer’s bill”: Lawyers in Anglo-American anti-proverbs. Acta Juridica Hungarica 52(1), 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology 7(4), 560–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1993). Psychologists in the eyewitness world. American Psychologist 48(5), 550–2.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist 58(1), 867–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4(1), 19.Google ScholarPubMed

Long, D. L., & Golding, J. M. (1993). Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? Discourse Processes 16(1–2), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, D. L., Golding, J. M., & Graesser, A. C. (1992). A test of the on-line status of goal-related inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 31(5), 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, D. L., Kreuz, R. J., & Church, M. (1989). A functional approach to irony. In Mio, J. S. (chair), Meaning What We Don’t Say: Challenges of Nonliteral Communication (symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Reno, NV).Google Scholar

Lorre, C., Prady, B., Engel, S., Rosenstock, R., Goetsch, D., Molaro, S. (writers), & Cendrowski, M. (director). (2008). The white asparagus triangulation [television series episode]. In P. Chakos & F. O. Balyeu (producers), The Big Bang Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Chuck Lorre Productions & Warner Bros. Television.Google Scholar

Loue, S. (2008). The Transformative Power of Metaphor in Therapy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Lovie, P. (1985). A note on an unexpected anchoring bias in intuitive statistical inference. Cognition 21(1), 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, G. (producer), & Lucas, G. (director). (1977). Star Wars. Episode IV: A New Hope [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar

Lunsford, R. F. (2014). Manipulative arguments in political speech. Paper presented at the 6th Symposium on Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics Conference, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar

Lusch, V. R., & Colston, H. L. (2000). A gender difference in asyndeton. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., Derryberry, D., Reed, M., & Poulsen, C. (2003). Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation. Psychological Science 14(1), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MacDonaldIII, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, Cameron S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288(5472), 1835–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). When in Rome ... learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(6), 731–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Magee, J. C., Milliken, F. J., & Lurie, A. R. (2010). Power differences in the construal of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(3), 354–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maglio, S. J., & Trope, Y. (2012). Disembodiment: Abstract construal attenuates the influence of contextual bodily state in judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(2), 211–16.Google Scholar

Malgady, R. G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Measurement of figurative language: Semantic feature models of comprehension and appreciation. In Honeck, R. P. & Hoffman, R. (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language (pp. 17–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Malt, B. C., & Eiter, B. (2004). Even with a green card, you can be put out to pasture and still have to work: Non-native intuitions of the transparency of common English idioms. Memory & Cognition 32(6), 896–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markel, N. N., & Hamp, E. P. (1960). Connotative meanings of certain phoneme sequences. Studies in Linguistics 15(1), 47–61.Google Scholar

Mason, Z. J. (2004). CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics 30(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mateo, J., & Yus, F. (2013). Towards a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insults. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1), 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGlone, M. S. (2011). Hyperbole, homunculi, and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48(8), 563–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1990). Textual inferences: Models and measures. In Balota, D. A., Flores D’Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K. (eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 403–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McKoon, G., (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review 99(3), 440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meibauer, J. (2008). Tautology as presumptive meaning. Pragmatics & Cognition 16(3), 439–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mieder, W. (2008). “Proverbs Speak Louder than Words”: Folk Wisdom in Art, Culture, Folklore, History, Literature, and Mass Media. New York: Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9(6), 788–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, J. P. (2008). Contributions of functional neuroimaging to the study of social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(2), 142–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50(4), 655–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muscatell, K. A., Morelli, S. A., Falk, E. B., Way, B. M., Pfeifer, J. H., Galinsky, A. D., Eisenberger, N. I., et al. (2012). Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network. NeuroImage 60(3), 1771–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. D. (2001). Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics 33(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, L. S., & Uleman, J. S. (1990). Assimilation and contrast effects in spontaneous trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16(2), 224–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, A., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Children’s processing of emotion in ironic language. Frontiers in Psychology 4. Available at: http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00691/full.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norrick, N. R. (2001). On the conversational performance of narrative jokes: Toward an account of timing. Humor 14(3), 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noveck, I. A., (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78(2), 165–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Noveck, I. A., & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85(2), 203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Brien, E. J., Shank, D. M., Myers, J. L., & Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: Do they occur on-line? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14(3), 410.Google ScholarPubMed

Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (2008). Connecting the dots: Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse. In Oakley, T. & Hougaard, A. (eds.), Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Obama rejects “lipstick” charge. (2008). BBC News Online, September 10. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7608653.stm.Google Scholar

Okamoto, S. (2002). Politeness and the perception of irony: Honorifics in Japanese. Metaphor and Symbol 17(2), 119–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are not just nice. Educational Theory 25(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A., & Jones, L. E. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language 24(5), 569–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition 86(3), 253–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parault, S. J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Sound-symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(4), 329–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and theraputic implications. Behaviour Research and Therapy 31(6), 539–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science 8(3), 162–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Telling stories: The health benefits of narrative. Literature and Medicine 19(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perfetti, C. A. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In Resnick, Lauren B. (ed). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 307–335). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, England.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (1993). Why inferences might be restricted. Discourse Processes 16(1–2), 181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Resnick, L. B. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In Resnick, L. B. (ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 307–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Roth, S. (1981). Some of the interactive processes in reading. In Lesgold, A. M. & Perfetti, C. A. (eds.), Interactive Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(3), 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pexman, P. M. (2005). Social factors in the interpretation of verbal irony: The roles of speaker and listener characteristics. In Colston, H. L. & Katz, A. N. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 209–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(4), 286–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes 29(3), 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., (2007). Reading of metaphor and irony. In Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (pp. 231–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002). Understanding irony: How do stereotypes cue speaker intent? Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(3), 245–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pexman, P. M., Zdrazilova, L., McConnachie, D., Deater-Deckard, K., & Petrill, S. A. (2009). “That was smooth, Mom”: Children’s production of verbal and gestural irony. Metaphor and Symbol 24(4), 237–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pexman, P. M., & Zvaigzne, M. T. (2004). Does irony go better with friends? Metaphor and Symbol 19(2), 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfaff, K. L., Gibbs, R. W., & Johnson, M. D. (1997). Metaphor in using and understanding euphemism and dysphemism. Applied Psycholinguistics 18(01), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. (2008). The stupidity of dignity. New Republic 28, 28–31.Google Scholar

Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., & Vincze, L. (2011). Agreement and its multimodal communication in debates: A qualitative analysis. Cognitive Computation 3(3), 466–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., (2015). Direct and indirect verbal and bodily insults and other forms of aggressive communication. In F. D’Errico, I. Poggi, A. Vinciarelli, & L. Vincze (eds.), Conflict and Multimodal Communication: Social Research and Machine Intelligence (pp. 243–64). Charn, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9(2–3), 219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (2007). Perspectival Thought: A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recchia, H. E., Howe, N., Ross, H. S., & Alexander, S. (2010). Children’s understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28(2), 255–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Richards, N. (2001). An idiomatic argument for lexical decomposition. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1), 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1999). Motivated search for common ground: Need for closure effects on audience design in interpersonal communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(9), 1101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306(5695), 443–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Riloff, E. (2014, August). Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar

Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., De Silva, L., Gilbert, N., & Huang, R. (2013). Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 704–14). Seattle, WA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Available at: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~alnds/papers/sarcasm_2013.pdf.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2004a). Common ground in metaphor theory: Continuing the conversation. Metaphor and Symbol 19(3), 233–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2004b). Lost in “conceptual space”: Metaphors of conceptual integration. Metaphor and Symbol 19(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2004c). Metaphors in conversational context: Toward a connectivity theory of metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol 19(4), 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2005). Frame-shifting in humor and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 20(4), 275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2008). X is a journey: Embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol 23(3), 174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science 5(3), 159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(5), 483–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rockwell, P. (2007). Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36(5), 361–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosaldo, M. Z. (1982). Things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11(2), 203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, R. (1997). Straight Man. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Ryder, N. & Leinonen, E. (2011). Relevance theory and language interpretation. In J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke, M.J. Williams, (eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes: Perspectives in communication disorders (pp. 747–760). New York, NY: Psychology Press, US.Google Scholar

Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2014). Pragmatic language development in language impaired and typically developing children: Incorrect answers in context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43(1), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, R. E., Wu, Y., & Bonito, J. A. (2013). The calculability of communicative intentions through pragmatic reasoning. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sardinha, T. B. (2006). Collocation lists as instruments for metaphor detection in corpora. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos Em Lingüística Teórica E Aplicada 22(2), 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sardinha, T. B. (2012). An assessment of metaphor retrieval methods. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martinez, M. Sanchez-Garcia, & A. M. Piquer-Piriz (eds.), Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture, and Communication (pp. 21–50), Amsterdam, Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Scharrer, L., & Christmann, U. (2011). Voice modulations in German ironic speech. Language and Speech 54(4), 435–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science 3(4), 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. Qualitative Report 10(2), 358–94.Google Scholar

Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(8), 1096–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 21(2), 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schourup, L. (2011). The discourse marker now: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 43(8), 2110–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 59–82). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seguin, M. (2007). A typically sarcastic tone of voice? Yeah, right! Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa 35, 161.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities: World Englishes and English as a lingua franca. World Englishes 28(2), 236–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Semino, E., Heywood, J., & Short, M. (2004). Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7), 1271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sequeiros, X. R. (2011). On metaphor, relevance, and pragmatic interpretation in Spanish. Modern Language Review 106(4), 1028–53.Google Scholar

Shteynberg, G. (2010). A silent emergence of culture: The social tuning effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(4), 683–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Singer, M., & Remillard, G. (2004). Retrieving text inferences: Controlled and automatic influences. Memory & Cognition 32(8), 1223–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Slugoski, B. R., & Turnbull, W. (1988). Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7(2), 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(4), 578–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1), 130–6.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelman, S. A. (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (pp. 39–67). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Spotorno, N., & Noveck, I. A. (2014). When is irony effortful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(4), 1649–65.Google ScholarPubMed