Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity: a meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 341–50. doi: 10.1037/a0027497CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambrose, D., Cohen, L. N. M., & Tannenbaum, J. A. (eds.) (2003). Creative Intelligence: Toward Theoretic Integration. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bink, M. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2000). Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of General Psychology, 4(1), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brophy, D. R. (2000). Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 439–55.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caprara, G. V., & Perugini, M. (1994). Personality described by adjectives: the generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality, 8(5), 357–69. doi: 10.1002/per.2410080502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499–506. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.85.3.499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2012). A Theory of Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing. In Van Lange, P., Kruglanski, A., & Higgins, E. (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 246–67). London: Sage. doi: doi: 10.4135/9781446249215.n13Google Scholar

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1999). Temperament: A New Paradigm for Trait Psychology. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 399–423). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropley, A. J. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

DeDreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–56. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.94.5.739Google Scholar

Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 491–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Raad, B., Hendriks, A. A. J., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1992). Towards a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 6(4), 301–19. doi: 10.1002/per.2410060405CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: the openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 63–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–96. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Domino, G., & Giuliani, I. (1997). Creativity in three samples of photographers: a validation of the adjective check list creativity scale. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2), 193–200. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1002&3_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory: An Integrative Theory of Personality. In Pervin, L. (ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 165–92). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes, R. V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck, H. J. (1992a). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 667–73. doi: 10.1016/0191–8869(92)90237-JCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1992b). The definition and measurement of psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(7), 757–85. doi: 10.1016/0191–8869(92)90050-YGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the World: A Framework for the Study of Creativity. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2014). Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: theoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing. Journal of Creative Behavior (available online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/. Doi: 10.1002/jocb.71/epdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galenson, D. W. (2006). Old Masters and Young Geniuses: The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gocłowska, M. A., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). How dual-identity processes foster creativity. Review of General Psychology, 18(3), 216–36. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398–1405. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.37.8.1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hofstadter, D. R. (1995). Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (2008). Handbook of Personality. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–38). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. A. (1994). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C model. European Journal of Personality, 8(4), 311–34. doi: 10.1002/per.2410080408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Kéri, S. (2011). Solitary minds and social capital: latent inhibition, general intellectual functions and social network size predict creative achievements. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts (available online at http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–81. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.133.3.464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kwang, N. A., & Rodrigues, D. (2002). A Big-Five personality profile of the adaptor and innovator. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(4), 254–68. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.2002.tb01068.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubow, R. E., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 87–103. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.117.1.87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lubow, R. E., Ingberg-Sachs, Y., Zalstein-Orda, N., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1992). Latent inhibition in low and high “psychotic-prone” normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(5), 563–72. doi: 10.1016/0191–8869(92)90197-WCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (1999). Biological Bases of Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 137–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to Experience. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 825–47). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 139–53). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–18.Google Scholar

Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mussel, P. (2013). Intellect: a theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 885–906. doi: 10.1037/a0031918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2010). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. doi: 16/j.intell.2010.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. H. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 323–32. doi: 16/S0191-8869(99)00101–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. H. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1137–47. doi: 16/S0191-8869(02)00004–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rea, D. (2003). Optimal Motivation for Creative Intelligence. In Creative Intelligence: Toward Theoretic Integration (pp. 211–35). New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Richards, R., Kinney, D. K., Lunde, I., Benet, M., & Merzel, A. P. L. (1988). Creativity in manic-depressives, cyclothymes, their normal relatives and control subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 281–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rothenberg, A. (1996). The janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2), 207–231. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj0902&3_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 847–79. doi: 10.1111/1467–6494.696167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and Mindless, but Sad and Smart? The Impact of Affective States on Analytic Reasoning. In Forgas, J. P. (ed.), Emotion and Social Judgment (pp. 55–71). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Schuldberg, D. (2010). Chaos Theory and Creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 259–72). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139–48. doi: 10.1037/a0014940CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., & Kimbrel, N. A. (2010). A dimensional analysis of creativity and mental illness: do anxiety and depression symptoms predict creative cognition, creative accomplishments, and creative self-concepts? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(1), 2–10. doi: 37/a0016494CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: a predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1), 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 144–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vosburg, S. K. (1998). The effect of positive and negative mood on divergent thinking performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1993). Behavioral Disinhibition versus Constraint: A Dispositional Perspective. In Wegner, D. M. & Pennebaker, J. W. (eds.), Handbook of Mental Control (pp. 506–27). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: an empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01080.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuckerman, M., & Cloninger, C. R. (1996). Relationships between Cloninger’s, Zuckerman’s, and Eysenck’s dimensions of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 283–5. doi: 10.1016/0191–8869(96)00042–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: the Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 757–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar