Aberbach, Joel, Chesney, James D., and Rockman, Bert A.. 1975. “Exploring Elite Political Attitudes: Some Methodological Lessons.” Political Methodology, 2(1):1–28.Google Scholar

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1983. Change and Continuity in the 1980 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2003. Change and Continuity in the 2000 and 2002 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” Journal of Politics, 70(4):542–55.Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science, 22(8):475–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. 2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science, 5(6):423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. 2011. “Palpating the Cat.” Lecture delivered to the Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University. Available at https://mediamatrix.tamu.edu.Google Scholar

Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science, 41(7):718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, James, Bishin, Benjamin G., and Dow, Jay K.. 2004. “Representation in Congressional Campaigns: Evidence for Discounting/Directional Voting in U.S. Senate Elections.” Journal of Politics, 66(5):348–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, William and Ferber, Paul. 1980. “Measuring Legislator-Constituency Congruence: Liquor, Legislators, and Linkage.” Journal of Politics, 42(2):202–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. and Rohde, David W.. 2000a. “The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government.” In Polarized Politics, ed. Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 31–72.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., Rohde, David W., and Tofias, Michael W.. 2007. “One D Is Not Enough: Measuring Conditional Party Government, 1887–2002.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress (vol. 2), ed. Brady, David W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 102–12.Google Scholar

American Political Science Association, Committee on Parties. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Jones, Philip Edward. 2010. “Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 54(7):583–97.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1):136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001b. “The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXVI(11):533–72.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review, 102(5):215–32.Google Scholar

Ardoin, Phillip J. and Garand, James C.. 2003. “Measuring Constituency Ideology in U.S. House Districts: A Top-Down Simulation Approach.” Journal of Politics, 65(11):1165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bafumi, Joseph and Herron, Michael C.. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members of Congress.” American Political Science Review, 104(8):519–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Michael and Brady, David W.. 1998. “Heterogeneity and Representation: The Senate and Free Trade.” American Journal of Political Science, 42(4):524–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, James David. 1965. The Lawmakers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Barone, Michael and Ujifusa, Grant. 1999. The Almanac of American Politics. Washington, DC: National Journal.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Congressional Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.” American Political Science Review, 85(6):457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Berry, William D. 1984. Nonrecursive Causal Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Beveridge, W. I. B. 1953. The Art of Scientific Investigation. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Beveridge, W. I. B. 1980. Seeds of Discovery. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Bishin, Benjamin G. 2000. “Constituency Influence in Congress: Does Subconstituency Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXV(8):389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishin, Benjamin G. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Black, Earl and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Blalock, Hubert M. 1969. Theory Construction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Brady, David W. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W. 2011. “Public Opinion and Congressional Policy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress, ed. Schickler, Eric and Lee, Frances E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 340–54.Google Scholar

Brady, David W. and Sinclair, Barbara. 1984. “Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics, 46(11):1033–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W. and Schwartz, Edward P.. 1995. “Ideology and Interests in Congressional Voting: The Politics of Abortion in the U.S. Senate.” Public Choice, 84(7):25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W., Cooper, Joseph, and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1979. “The Decline of Party in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1968.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, IV(8):381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W. and Lynn, Naomi B.. 1973. “Switched-Seat Congressional Districts; Their Effect on Party Voting and Public Policy.” American Journal of Political Science, 17(8):528–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bunge, Mario. 1959. Causality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Burden, Barry C. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Burgin, Eileen. 2009. “Deciding on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Evidence from Congress’ First Showdown with President George W. Bush.” Politics and the Life Sciences, 28(3):3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly, 56(3):29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calfano, Brian Robert. 2010. “The Power to Brand: Beyond Interest Group Influence in U.S. State Abortion Politics.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 10(9):227–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review, 96(3):127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canon, David T. 1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carey, John M. 2007. “Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 51(1):92–107.Google Scholar

Carey, John M. and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies, 14(4):417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carman, Christopher 2007. “Assessing Preferences for Political Representation in the U.S.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 17(1):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review, 74(3):78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1986. “The Politics and Policy of Race in Congress.” In Congress and Policy Change, ed. Wright, Gerald C. Jr., Rieselbach, Leroy N., and Dodd, Lawrence C.. New York: Agathon. 70–93.Google Scholar

Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmines, Edward G. and Zeller, Richard A.. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Jamie L. 2008. “Electoral Accountability, Party Loyalty, and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. Senate.” In Why Not Parties? ed. Monroe, Nathan W., Roberts, Jason M., and Rohde, David W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiou, Fang-Yi and Rothenberg, Lawrence S.. 2009. “A Unified Theory of Lawmaking: Preferences, Institutions, and Party Discipline.” Journal of Politics, 71(10):1257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, David H. and Reed, William. 2003. “A Unified Theory of War Onset and Outcome.” Journal of Politics, 65(2):69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 1999. Statistics of the Congressional Election of November 3, 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives.Google Scholar

Clinton, Joshua A. 2006. “Representation in the Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House.” Journal of Politics, 68(5):397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Congressional Quarterly. 1977. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Congressional Quarterly. 1982. Congressional Quarterly Almanac: 97th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Congressional Quarterly. 2000. Congressional Quarterly: 1999 Almanac. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David. New York: The Free Press. 206–61.Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E. and Pierce, Roy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cnudde, Charles F. and McCrone, Donald J.. 1966. “The Linkage between Constituency Attitudes and Congressional Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review, 60(3):66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, Wilder. 1960. “Do Representatives Represent?” Journal of Politics, 22 (5):295–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, Brian F., Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C., Jones, Bradford S., Jones, Mark P., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2004. “Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.” Journal of Politics, 66(8):823–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, Lee J. and Meehl, Paul E.. 1955.”Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.” Psychological Bulletin, 52(7):281–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cronin, Thomas E. 1989. Direct Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deckard, Barbara Sinclair. 1976. “Electoral Marginality and Party Loyalty in House Roll Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, XX(8):469–81.Google Scholar

Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1957. “The Representative and His District.” Human Organization, XVI(Spring), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1969. The Sociology and Politics of Congress. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Dwyre, Diana and Farrar-Myers, Victoria A.. 2001. Legislative Labyrinth. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. 1920. Relativity: The Special and General Theory. Trans. by Lawson, Robert W.. New York: Hartsdale House.Google Scholar

Elifson, Kirk W. and Hadaway, C. Kirk. 1985. “Prayer in Public Schools: When Church and State Collide.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(3):317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, Christopher. 2013. “Social Context and Economic Biases in Representation.” Journal of Politics, 75(7):773–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1971. “The Electoral Impact of Congressional Role Call Voting.” American Political Science Review, LXV(12):1018–32.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science, 22(8):511–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1981. “Measuring Constituency Opinion: The 1978 U.S. Congressional Election Survey.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, VI(May):235–45.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Wright, Gerald C.. 1980. “Policy Representation of Constituency Interests.” Political Behavior, 2(1):91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Wright, Gerald C.. 2005. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered (8th edn.), ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 77–106.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Wright, Gerald C.. 2009. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered (9th edn.), ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 71–96.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eulau, Heinz, and Karps, Paul. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2(8):233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eulau, Heinz, Wahlke, John C., Buchanan, William, and Ferguson, LeRoy C.. 1959. “The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke.” American Political Science Review, 53(9):742–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feld, Scott L. and Grofman, Bernard. 1988. “Ideological Consistency as a Collective Phenomenon.” American Political Science Review, 82(9):773–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1990. Watching Politicians: Essays on Participant Observation. Berkeley: IGS Press/University of California.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Grant. 2011. “The Missing Link: District Heterogeneity and Legislative Roles.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard. 1965. Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1973. “Electoral Margins, Constituency Influence and Policy Moderation: A Critical Assessment.” American Politics Quarterly, 1(10):479–98.Google Scholar

Fleisher, Richard and Bond, Jon R.. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the U.S. Congress.” British Journal of Political Science, 34(7):429–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, Floyd J. 2009. Survey Research Methods (4th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Fox, Justin and Kenneth, W. and Shotts, . 2009. “Delegates or Trustees?” Journal of Politics, 71(10):1225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frendreis, John P. and Waterman, Richard W.. 1985. “PAC Contributions and Legislative Behavior: Senate Voting on Trucking Deregulation.” Social Science Quarterly, 66(6):401–12.Google Scholar

Froman, Lewis A. 1963. Congressmen and Their Constituencies. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Stern, Hal. 2006. “The Difference between ‘Significant’ and ‘Not Significant’ Is Not Itself Statistically Significant.” The American Statistician, 60(11):328–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R. and Jackson, John E.. 1993. “Endogenous Preferences and the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review, 87(9):639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R. and Lewis, Jeffrey B.. 2004. “Beyond the Median Voter: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation.” Journal of Political Economy, 112(12):1364–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenmary Research Center. 2000. Religious Congregations & Membership in the United States, 2000. Nashville, TX.Google Scholar

Griffin, John D. 2006. “Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis.” Journal of Politics, 68(11):911–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, John D. and Newman, Brian. 2005. “Are Voters Better Represented?” Journal of Politics, 67(11):1206–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, John D. and Newman, Brian. 2007. “The Unequal Representation of Latinos and Whites.” Journal of Politics, 69(11):1032–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmer, Justin. 2013. “Appropriators Not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science, 57(7):624–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gronke, Paul, Koch, Jeffrey, Wilson, J. Matthew. 2003. “Follow the Leader? Presidential Approval, Presidential Support, and Representatives’ Electoral Fortunes.” Journal of Politics, 65(8):785–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic Econometrics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gulati, Girish J. 2004. “Revisiting the Link between Electoral Competition and Policy Extremism in the U.S. Congress.” American Politics Research, 32(9):495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampsher-Monk, Iain. 1987. The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Harden, Jeffrey J. and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2012. “Balancing Constituency Representation and Party Responsiveness in the U.S. Senate: The Conditioning Effect of State Ideological Heterogeneity.” Public Choice, 150(1):137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, William L. 1981. Statistics (3rd edn.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile. n.d. “Unraveling the ‘Standard Model’ of Dyadic Policy Representation in Search of a General Theory of Legislative Behavior.” Working paper.Google Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile. 2011. “In Search of General Theory.” Journal of Politics, 74(10):917–31.Google Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile and Hinton-Andersson, Angela. 1995. “Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Public Policy Linkages.” American Journal of Political Science, 39(11):924–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science, 43(1):109–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile and Hurley, Patricia A.. 2002. “Symbolic Speeches in the U.S. Senate and Their Representational Implications.” Journal of Politics, 64(2):219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holton, Gerald. 1952. Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Holton, Gerald. 1986. The Advancement of Science, and Its Burdens. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, Albert R. 1982. “The Campaign and the Issues.” In The American Elections of 1980, ed. Ranney, Austin. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. 142–76.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 1950. “A Revised Theory of American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review, 44(9):669–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. 1982. “Collective Representation Reappraised.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 7(2):119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. 1989. “Partisan Representation and the Failure of Realignment in the 1980s.” American Journal of Political Science, 33(2):240–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. 1991. “Partisan Representation, Realignment, and the Senate in the 1980s.” Journal of Politics, 53(2):3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. 1994. “Electoral Realignments.” In Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System, ed. Silbey, Joel H.. New York: Scribner's. 529–45.Google Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. and Hill, Kim Quaile. 2003. “Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages.” Journal of Politics, 65(5):304–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. and Hill, Kim Quaile. 2010. “In Search of Representation Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, ed. Leighley, Jan E.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 716–40.Google Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. and Kerr, Brinck. 2000. “The Effects of Party Advantage on the Partisan Distinctiveness of New Members in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25(2):53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurwitz, Jon and Peffley, Mark. 1987. “How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” American Political Science Review, 81(12):1099–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. 1972. The American Representation Study, 1958: Candidate and Constituent. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Jackson, John E. and King, David C.. 1989. “Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation.” American Political Science Review, 83(12):1143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. “The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952–1982.” American Journal of Political Science, 31(2):126–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2005. “Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections.” Political Science Quarterly, 120(Summer):199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2009. The Politics of Congressional Elections (7th edn.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Joesten, Danielle A. and Stone, Walter J.. 2014. “Reassessing Proximity Voting: Expertise, Party, and Choice in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics, 76(7):740–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar

Kerlinger, Fred N. and Lee, Howard B.. 2000. Foundations of Behavioral Research (4th edn.). New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Alt, James E., Burns, Nancy Elizabeth, and Laver, Michael. 1990. “A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science, 34(8):846–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions (2nd edn.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Klahr, David and Simon, Herbert A.. 2001. “What Have Psychologists (And Others) Discovered about the Process of Scientific Discovery?” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6):75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. 1977. “District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll Call Voting: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science, 21(8):627–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. 1978. “Representativeness and Elections: A Policy Analysis.” American Political Science Review, 72(3):165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. and McCrone, Donald J.. 1980. “Policy Salience and the Causal Structure of Representation.” American Politics Quarterly, 8(4):139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. and Elling, Richard C.. 1977. “Representational Role, Constituency Opinion, and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science, XXI(2):135–47.Google Scholar

Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, Schwieder, David, and Rich, Robert F.. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Politics, 62(8):790–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lax, Jeffrey R. and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review, 103(8):367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lax, Jeffrey R. and Phillips, Justin H.. 2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science, 56(1):148–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leege, David C. and Francis, Wayne L.. 1974. Political Research. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

LeoGrande, William and Jeydel, Alana S.. 1997. “Using Presidential Election Returns to Measure Constituency Ideology.” American Politics Quarterly, 25(1):3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeoGrande, William M. and Brenner, Philip. 1993. “The House Divided: Ideological Polarization over Aid to the Nicaraguan ‘Contras.’” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 18(2):105–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leuthold, David A. 1968. Electioneering in a Democracy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lindsay, James M. and Ripley, Randall B.. 1992. “Foreign and Defense Policy in Congress: A Research Agenda for the 1990s.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, XVII (8):417–49.Google Scholar

Lipinski, John S. 2008. “Policy Substance and Performance in American Lawmaking, 1877–1994.” American Journal of Political Science, 52(4):235–51.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, Rabinowitz, George, and Listhaug, Ola. 1998. “Sophistry versus Science: On Further Efforts to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model.” Journal of Politics, 63(5):482–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1974. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacRae, Duncan Jr.. 1952. “The Relation between Roll Call Votes and Constituencies in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review, 46(12):1046–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacRae, Duncan. 1958. Dimensions of Congressional Voting. Berkeley: University of California Publications in Sociology and Social Institutions.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott and Linan, Anibal Perez. 1997. “Party Discipline in the Brazilian Constitutional Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22(11):453–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marini, Margaret Mooney and Singer, Burton. 1988. “Causality in the Social Sciences.” In Sociological Methodology, ed. Clogg, Clifford C.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 347–409.Google Scholar

Matthews, Donald R. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McClosky, Herbert, Hoffman, Paul J., and O'Hara, Rosemary. 1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review, 54(6):406–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrone, Donald J. and Kuklinski, James H.. 1979. “The Delegate Theory of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science, 23(5):278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Samuel III, and Grofman, Bernard. 1999. A Unified Theory of Voting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miler, Kristina C. 2010. Constituency Representation in Congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E. 1962. “Majority Rule and the Representative System of Government.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC. Reprinted on pages 284–311 in Mass Politics, ed. Allardt, Erik and Rokkan, Stein. New York: Free Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E. 1970. “Majority Rule and the Representative System of Government.” In Mass Politics, ed. Allardt, Erik and Rokkan, Stein. New York: Free Press. 284–311.Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review, 57(3):45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. n.d. Representation in the American Congress. Typescript.Google Scholar

Moore, David W. 2005. “Public Favors Voluntary Prayer for Public Schools.” Princeton, NJ: Gallup News Service. Available at www.gallup.com/poll/18136/public-favors-voluntary-prayer-public-schools.aspx.Google Scholar

Munck, Geraldo L. 2004. “Tools for Qualitative Research.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry, ed. Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 105–22.Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew D. and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis, 10(Spring):134–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutting, Brian and Stern, H. Amy (eds.). 2002. CQ's Politics in America, 2002. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar

Overby, Marvin L. 1991. “Assessing Constituency Influence: Congressional Voting on the Nuclear Freeze, 1982–83.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, XVI(5):297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., Gronke, Paul W., and Rosenberg, Robert M.. 1984. “Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(Winter):741–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis, 12(Autumn):375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pedhazur, Elazar J. 1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research (2nd edn.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Plotkin, Henry A. 1977. “Issues in the 1976 Presidential Campaign.” In The Election of 1976, ed. Pomper, Gerald M., Baker, Ross K., Jacob, Charles E., McWilliams, Wilson Carey, and Plotkin, Henry A.. New York: Longman. 35–53.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Popper, Carl R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Powell, Lynda W. 1982. “Issue Representation in Congress.” Journal of Politics, 44(8):658–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Vincent, David, Clarissa, Goldthorpe, Brian, Roth, Marci McCoy, and Cappella, Joseph N.. 2006. “Locating the Issue Public: The Multi-Dimensional Nature of Engagement with Health Care Reform.” Political Behavior, 28(3):33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley InterScience.Google Scholar

Prewitt, Kenneth. 1970. The Recruitment of Political Leaders. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, George and Macdonald, Stuart Elaine. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review, 83(3):93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rehfield, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review, 103(5):214–30.Google Scholar

Roberds, Stephen C. and Roberts, Jason M.. 2002. “Are All Amateurs Equal? Candidate Quality in the 1992–1998 House Elections.” Politics & Policy, 30(9):482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David and Aldrich, John. 2010. “Consequences of Electoral and Institutional Change: The Evolution of Conditional Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In New Directions in American Political Parties, ed. Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. New York: Routledge. 234–50.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Alan. 2004. Heavy Lifting. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Rossiter, Clinton. 1961. The Federalist Papers. New York: The New American Library.Google Scholar

Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Catherine R., Brady, David W., Brody, Richard A., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1990. “Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15(11):599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shanks, J. Merrill and Miller, Warren E.. 1990. “Policy Direction and Performance Evaluation: Complementary Explanations of the Reagan Elections.” British Journal of Political Science, 20(4):143–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shannon, W. Wayne. 1968. Party, Constituency and Congressional Voting. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1982. Congressional Realignment, 1925–1978. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1986. Party Wars. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda with Ikenberry, John. 1995. “The Road to Social Security.” In Social Policy in the United States, ed. Skocpol, Theda. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 136–66.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., Roberts, Jason M., and Wielen, Ryan J. Vander. 2009. The American Congress (6th edn.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S. and Gamm, Gerald. 2005. “The Dynamics of Party Government in Congress.” In Congress Reconsidered (8th edn.), ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 181–206.Google Scholar

Sovey, Allison J. and Green, Donald P.. 2011. “Instrumental Variables Estimation in Political Science: A Readers’ Guide.” American Journal of Political Science, 55(1):188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spitzer, Robert J. 2004. The Politics of Gun Control (3rd edn.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review, 89(9):543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stock, James H. and Watson, Mark W.. 2011. Introduction to Econometrics (3rd edn.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Stock, James H. and Yogo, Motohiro. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference in Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg, ed. Andrews, Donald W. K. and Stock, James H.. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, Donald E. and Miller, Warren E.. 1962. “Party Government and the Salience of Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(Winter):531–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Walter J. 1982. “Electoral Change and Policy Representation in Congress: Domestic Welfare Issues from 1956–1972.” British Journal of Political Science, 12(1):95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Walter J. and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2010. “Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science, 54(4):371–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, John L. and Uslaner, Eric M.. 1978. “Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality.” American Journal of Political Science, 22(8):536–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sulkin, Tracy. 2011. The Legislative Legacy of Congressional Campaigns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar

Theriault, Sean M. 2006. “Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress.” Party Politics, 12(7):483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Julius. 1951. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Ura, Joseph Daniel and Ellis, Christopher R.. 2008. “Income, Preferences, and the Dynamics of Policy Responsiveness.” PS: Political Science & Politics, XLI(10):785–94.Google Scholar

U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000. United States – Congressional Districts by State; and for Puerto Rico (106th Congress), GCT-P15. Selected Age Groups: 2000. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry R.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wahlke, John C. 1972. “Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented.” British Journal of Political Science, 1(7):271–90.Google Scholar

Wahlke, John C., Eulau, Heinz, Buchanan, William, and Ferguson, LeRoy C.. 1962. The Legislative System. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Warshaw, Christopher and Rodden, Jonathan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?” Journal of Politics, 74(1):203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, Eugene J., Campbell, Donald T., Schwartz, Richard D., and Sechrest, Lee. 1966. Unobtrusive Measures. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review, 72(6):535–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wessels, Bernhard. 1999. “System Characteristics Matter: Empirical Evidence from Ten Representation Studies. In Policy Representation in Western Democracies, ed. Miller, Warren E., Pierce, Roy, Thomassen, Jacques, Herrera, Richard, Holmberg, Soren, Esaiasson, Peter, and Wessels, Bernhard. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 137–61.Google Scholar

White, Michael. 1997. Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer. New York: Helix.Google Scholar

Wirls, Daniel. 2010. Irrational Security. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science, 39(11):981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem.’” Electoral Studies, 24(4):555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Gerald C. 1989. “Policy Voting in the U.S. Senate: Who Is Represented?” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14(11):465–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar