Aberbach, Joel D., Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight (The Brookings Institution Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Aguilar, Paloma, ‘Judiciary Involvement in Authoritarian Repression and Transitional Justice: The Spanish Case in Comparative Perspective’ (2013) 7 International Journal of Transitional Justice 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘Hobbling the Monitors: Should U.N. Human Rights Monitors be Accountable?’ (2011) 53 Harvard International Law Journal 561.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., ‘Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context’ (2008) 14 European Journal of International Relations 33.Google Scholar

Andrieu, Kora, ‘An Unfinished Business: Transitional Justice and Democratization in Post-Soviet Russia’ (2011) 5 International Journal of Transitional Justice 198.Google Scholar

Aucoin, Peter and Heintzman, Ralph, ‘The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform’ (2000) 66 International Review of Administrative Sciences 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Autheman, Violaine and Elena, Sandra, ‘Global Best Practices-Judicial Councils: Lessons Learned from Europe and Latin America’ (IFES, 2004).Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian, Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam, 2010). ISBN 0553807633.Google Scholar

Bandes, Susan, ‘Judging, Politics, and Accountability: A Reply to Charles Geyh’ (2006) 56 Case Western Reserve Law Review 947.Google Scholar

Bárd, Károly, ‘Judicial Independence in the Accession Countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltics’ in Sajó, András and Bentch, Lorri Rutt (eds.), Judicial Integrity (Martinus Nijhoff 2004). ISBN 9789004140059.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence, The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior (University of Michigan Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Beaud, Olivier, ‘Reframing a Debate among Americans: Contextualizing a Moral Philosophy of Law’ (2009) 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 53.Google Scholar

Beaumont, Paul, ‘The European Court of Justice. By Hjalte Rasmussen (short review)’ (European Law Books) (available at: www.europeanlawbooks.org/reviews/detail.asp?id=103).Google Scholar

Belge, Ceran, ‘Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey’ (2006) 40 Law & Society Review 653.Google Scholar

Bell, John, ‘Judicial Culture and Judicial Independence’ (2001–2002) 4 Cambridge Y.B. Eur. Legal Stud. 47Google Scholar

Bell, John, Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review (CUP, 2006).Google Scholar

Bell, John, ‘Reflections on Continental European Supreme Courts’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, ‘The Democratic Qualities of Courts: A Critical Analysis of Three Arguments’ (2013) 49 Representation 333.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard and Parau, Cristina, ‘Introduction: Democracy, Courts and the Dilemmas of Representation’ (2013) 49 Representation 255.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (first published 1781, OUP, 1996).Google Scholar

Benvenuti, Simone, ‘The French and the Italian high councils for the judiciary: Observations drawn from the analysis of their staff and activity (1947–2011)’ (2012 IPSA World Congress, Madrid, July 8–12, 2012).Google Scholar

Bértoa, Fernando Casal, ‘Parties, Regime and Cleavages: Explaining Party System Institutionalization in East Central Europe’ (2012) 28 East European Politics 452.Google Scholar

Bértoa, Fernando Casal, ‘Post-Communist Politics: On the Divergence (and/or Convergence) of East and West Government and Opposition’ (2013) 48 Government and Opposition 398.Google Scholar

Bértoa, Fernando Casal, ‘Party Systems and Cleavage Structures Revisited: A Sociological Explanation of Party System Institutionalization’ (2014) 20 Party Politics 16.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander, The Least Dangerous Branch (Bobs-Merrill, 1962).Google Scholar

Binmore, Ken, Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction (OUP, 2007).Google Scholar

Blaive, Muriel and Maslowski, Nicolas, ‘The World of the Two Václavs: European-Minded vs. National(ist) Intellectuals in Czechia’ in Lacroix, Justine and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso (eds.), European Stories: Intellectual Debates on Europe in National Contexts (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Blankenburg, Erhard, ‘The Purge of Lawyers after the Breakdown of the East German Communist Regime’ (1995) 20 Law & Social Inquiry 223.Google Scholar

Bobek, Michal, ‘The Fortress of Judicial Independence and the Mental Transitions of the Central European Judiciaries’ (2008) 14 European Public Law 99.Google Scholar

Bobek, Michal, ‘Quantity or Quality? Re-Assessing the Role of Supreme Jurisdictions in Central Europe’ (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 33.Google Scholar

Bobek, Michal, ‘The Administration of Courts in the Czech Republic – In Search of a Constitutional Balance’ (2010) 16 European Public Law 251.Google Scholar

Bobek, Michal and Kosař, David, ‘Global Solutions, Local Damages: A Critical Study in Judicial Councils in Central and Eastern Europe’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 1257.Google Scholar

Bodnar, Adam and Bojarski, Lukasz, ‘Judicial Independence in Poland’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Bojarski, Lukasz and Köster, Werner Stemker, The Slovak Judiciary: Its Current State and Challenges (Open Society Fund, 2011).Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, ‘Analysing and Assessing Accountability: Conceptual Framework’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal 447.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism (2010) 33 West European Politics 946.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark and others, ‘Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool’ (2008) 86 Public Administration 225.Google Scholar

Boyron, Sophie, ‘The Independence of the Judiciary: A Question of Identity’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Bozhilova, Diana, ‘Measuring Success and Failure of EU-Europeanization in the Eastern Enlargement: Judicial Reform in Bulgaria’ (2007) 9 European Journal of Law Reform 285.Google Scholar

Brody, David, ‘The Use of Judicial Performance Evaluation to Enhance Judicial Accountability, Judicial Independence, and Public Trust’ (2008) 86 Denver University Law Review 115.Google Scholar

Bröstl, Alexander, ‘At the Crossroads on the Way to an Independent Slovak Judiciary’ in Přibáň, Jiří, Roberts, Pauline, and Young, James (eds.), Systems of Justice in Transition: Central European Experiences since 1989 (Ashgate 2003).Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephen B. and Friedman, Barry (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach (SAGE Publications, 2002).Google Scholar

Cabada, Ladislav, Hloušek, Vít and Jurek, Petr, Party Systems in East Central Europe (Lexington Books, 2014).Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Clark, Tom S., and Park, Jee-Kwang, ‘Judicial Independence and Retention Elections’ (2012) 28 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canivet, Guy, ‘The Responsibility of Judges in France’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Cappelletti, Mauro, ‘Who Watches the Watchmen? A Comparative Study of Judicial Responsibility’ (1983) 31 American Journal of Comparative Law 1.Google Scholar

Čaputová, Zuzana (ed.), Zodpovednosť sudcu: Sudcovská etika a disciplinárna zodpovednosť (VIA IURIS, 2011).Google Scholar

Carbonnier, Jean, Droit civil. Introduction (21st ed., Presses Universitaires de France, 1992).Google Scholar

Chavez, Rebecca Bill, ‘The Appointment and Removal Process for Judges in Argentina: The Role of Judicial Councils and Impeachment Juries in Promoting Judicial Independence’ (2005) 49 Latin American Politics & Society 33.Google Scholar

Chisholm, Neil, ‘The Faces of Judicial Independence: Democratic versus Bureaucratic Accountability in Judicial Selection, Training, and Promotion in South Korea and Taiwan’, (2014) 62 American Journal of Comparative Law 893.Google Scholar

Choi, Stephen J. and others, ‘What Do Federal District Judges Want? An Analysis of Publications, Citations and Reversals’ (2012) 28 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 518.Google Scholar

Clark, David S., ‘The Organization of Lawyers and Judges’ in Capelletti, Mauro (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Volume XVI: Civil Procedure (Mohr Siebeck 2002).Google Scholar

Clark, Tom S., The Limits of Judicial Independence (CUP, 2010).Google Scholar

Cochrane, Joe, ‘Top Indonesian Judge Held in Corruption Case’ The New York Times (New York, October 3, 2013).Google Scholar

Colbran, Stephen, ‘The Limits of Judicial Accountability: the Role of Judicial Performance Evaluation’ (2003) 6 Legal Ethics 55.Google Scholar

Coman, Ramona and Dallara, Cristina, ‘Judicial Independence in Romania’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Comella, Victor Ferreres, Constitutional Courts and Democratic Values: A European Perspective (Yale University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Comte-Sponville, André, Dictionnaire philosophique (PUF 2001) 624 (quoted in Canivet, Guy, ‘The Responsibility of Judges in France’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2006) 30.Google Scholar

Contini, Francesco and Mohr, Richard, ‘Reconciling Independence and Accountability in Judicial Systems’ (2007) 3 Utrecht Law Review 26.Google Scholar

Costa, Jean-Paul, Le Conseil d’État dans la societé contemporaine [The Conseil d’État in Contemporary Society] (1993).Google Scholar

Couso, Javier, ‘Judicial Independence in Latin America: The Lessons of History in the Search for an Always Elusive Ideal’ in Ginsburg, Tom and Kagan, Robert A. (eds.), Institutions & Public Law: Comparative Approaches (Peter Lang Publishing 2005).Google Scholar

Cross, Frank, ‘Judicial Independence’ in Whittington, Keith E. and others (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (USA, OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Cunliffe, John and Reeve, Andrew, ‘Dialogic Authority’ (1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 453.Google Scholar

Damaška, Mirjan R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Dan, Jiří, ‘Psychologická vyšetření uchazečů o přijetí na pozice právních čekatelů a státních zástupců v letech 1998–2010’ No. 10/2011 Státní zastupitelství.Google Scholar

Darski, Jozef, ‘Decommunization in Eastern Europe’ (1993) 6 Uncaptive Minds 73.Google Scholar

David, René and Brierley, John, Major Legal Systems in the World Today (3rd ed., Stevens, 1985).Google Scholar

David, Roman, Lustration and Transitional Justice: Personnel Systems in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, Philip, The Oracles of the Law (University of Michigan Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Deegan-Krause, Kevin, ‘Uniting the Enemy: Politics and the Convergence of Nationalisms in Slovakia’ (2004) 18 East European Politics and Societies 651.Google Scholar

Deegan-Krause, Kevin and Haughton, Tim, ‘A Fragile Stability: The Institutional Roots of Low Party System Volatility in the Czech Republic, 1990–2009’ (2010) 17 Czech Journal of Political Science 227.Google Scholar

Delpeuch, Thierry and Vassileva, Margarita, ‘Lessons from the Bulgarian Judicial Reforms: Practical Ways to Exert Political Influence on a Formally Very Independent Judiciary’ in de Groot-van Leeuwen, Leny E. and Rombouts, Wannes (eds.), Separation of Powers in Theory and Practice: An International Perspective (Wolf Legal Publishers 2010).Google Scholar

Di Federico, Giuseppe, ‘Independence and Accountability of the Judiciary in Italy: The Experience of a Former Transitional Country in a Comparative Perspective’ in Sajó, András (eds.), Judicial Integrity (Brill Academic Publishers 2004).Google Scholar

Di Federico, Giuseppe (ed.), Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe (IRSIG-CNR, 2005).Google Scholar

Dodek, Adam and Sossin, Lorne (eds.), Judicial Independence in Context (Irwin Law, 2010).Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory Of Democracy (Harper, 1957).Google Scholar

Drahozal, Christopher, ‘Judicial Incentives and the Appeals Process’ (1998) 51 Southern Methodist University Law Review 469.Google Scholar

Drgonec, Ján, ‘Disciplinárna zodpovednosť sudcov – Mechanizmus a podmienky jej uplatnenia: Prvá časť: Inštitucionálne zabezpečenie’ (2006) 58 Justičná revue 413.Google Scholar

Drgonec, Ján, ‘Disciplinárna zodpovednosť sudcov – Mechanizmus a podmienky jej uplatnenia: Druhá časť: Uplatňovanie disciplinárnej zodpovednosti v praxi disciplinárného súdu’ (2006) 58 Justičná revue 601.Google Scholar

Dubovcová, Jana, ‘Sudnictvo a korupcia’ in Sičáková-Beblavá, Emília and Zemanovičová, Daniela (eds.), Protikorupčne nastroje (TIS 2003).Google Scholar

Dubovcová, Jana, ‘Umožňuje súčasný stav súdnictva zneužívanie disciplinárneho konania voči sudcom, zneužívanie výberových konaní a dáva výkonnej moci oprávnenie zasiahnuť do súdnej moci?’ in Transparency International Slovensko (ed.), Výzvy slovenského súdnictva a možnosti zlepšenia existujúceho stavu (Transparency International Slovensko, 2010).Google Scholar

Dumont, Patrick and Varone, Frédéric, ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies: Smallness, Proximity and Shortcuts’ in Braun, Dietmar and Gilardi, Fabrizio (eds.), Delegation in Contemporary Democracies (Routledge 2006).Google Scholar

Dunn, John, Democracy: A History (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David, Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves: Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order (Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Accountability and the Concept of (Global) Administrative Law’ in Global Administrative Law (Acta Juridica, 2009) 3.Google Scholar

Emmert, Frank, ‘The Independence of Judges – A Concept Often Misunderstood in Central and Eastern Europe’ (2001) 3 European Journal of Law Reform 405.Google Scholar

Enyedi, Zsolt and Bértoa, Fernando Casal, ‘Party System Closure and Openness: Conceptualization, Operationalization and Validation’ (2014) (available at: http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/08/1354068814549340.abstract).Google Scholar

Enyedi, Zsolt and Bértoa, Fernando Casal (2014), ‘Elite and Mass Dynamics: The East Central European Example’, paper presented at the OPPR Workshop on “Parties and Democracy in Post-communist Europe” at EUI on September 18–19, 2014 (available at: http://whogoverns.eu/elite-and-mass-dynamics-the-east-central-european-example/).Google Scholar

Erdos, David, Delegating Rights Protection: The Rise of Bills of Rights in the Westminster World (OUP, 2010).Google Scholar

Errera, Roger, Et ce sera justice: Le juge dans la cité (Gallimard, 2013).Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N., ‘Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions’ (1991) 101 The Yale Law Journal 331.Google Scholar

Eyal, Gil, ‘Anti-Politics and the Spirit of Capitalism: Dissidents, Monetarists, and the Czech Transition to Capitalism’ (2000) 29 Theory and Society 49.Google Scholar

Eyal, Gil, The Origins of Postcommunist Elites: From the Prague Spring to the Breakup of Czechoslovakia (University of Minnesota Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Fearon, James D., ‘Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance’ in Przeworski, Adam and others (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (CUP 1999).Google Scholar

Felter, Edwin L., ‘Accountability in the Administrative Law Judiciary: The Right and the Wrong Kind’ (2008) 86 Denver University Law Review 157.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, ‘Law, Legislation, and Positive Political Theory’ in Banks, Jeffrey S. and Hanushek, Eric Alan (eds.), Modern Political Economy: Old Topics, New Directions (Cambridge University Press 1995).Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, ‘Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence’ (1999) 72 Southern California Law Review 353.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, ‘Accountability in a Global Context’ IILJ Working Paper 5/2007 (available at: www.iilj.org/publications/2007-5Ferejohn.asp).Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John and Kramer, Larry, ‘Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalizing Judicial Restraint’ (2002) 77 New York University Law Review 962.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen, ‘The Right Degree of Independence’ in Stotzky, Irwin P. (ed.), Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary (Westview Press 1993).Google Scholar

Fleck, Zoltán, ‘Judicial Independence and its Environment in Hungary’ in Přibáň, Jiří, et al. (eds.), Systems of Justice in Transition: Central European Experiences since 1989 (Ashgate Publishing 2003).Google Scholar

Fleck, Zoltán, ‘Judicial Independence in Hungary’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Frankowski, Stanislaw, ‘The Procuracy and the Regular Courts as the Palladium of Individual Rights and Liberties – the Case of Poland’ (1987) 61 Tulane Law Review 1307.Google Scholar

Frankowski, Stanislaw, ‘The Independence of the Judiciary in Poland: Reflections on Andrzej Rzeplinski’s Sadownictwo w Polsce Ludowej (The Judiciary in Peoples’ Poland) (1989)’ (1991) 8 Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 33.Google Scholar

Friedman, Barry, The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009).Google Scholar

Frommer, Benjamin, National Cleansing: Retribution against Nazi Collaborators in Postwar Czechoslovakia (CUP, 2005).Google Scholar

Gallie, Walter B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ in Black, Max (ed.), The Importance of Language (Prentice-Hall 1962), 121–146.Google Scholar

Galligan, Denis, ‘Principal Institutions and Mechanisms of Judicial Accountability’ in Van Puymbroeck, Rudolf V. (ed.), Comprehensive Legal and Judicial Development: Towards an Agenda for a Just and Equitable Society in the 21st Century (World Bank Publications 2001).Google Scholar

Garapon, Antoine (ed.), Les juges: un pouvoir irresponsible? (Nicolas Philippe, 2003).Google Scholar

Garapon, Antoine, ‘Une Justice ‘Comptable’ de ses Decisions?’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Garapon, Antoine and Epineuse, Harold, ‘Judicial Independence in France’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 273–305.Google Scholar

Garapon, Antoine and Papadopoulos, Ioannis, Juger en Amérique et en France: Culture juridique francaise et common law (Odile Jacob 2003).Google Scholar

Geyh, Charles Gardner, ‘Informal Methods of Judicial Discipline’ (1993–1994) 142 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 243.Google Scholar

Geyh, Charles Gardner, ‘Rescuing Judicial Accountability from the Realm of Political Rhetoric’ (2006) 56 Case Western Reserve Law Review 911.Google Scholar

Gardner, John, ‘Some Types of Law’ in Edlin, Douglas E. (ed.), Common Law Theory (CUP 2007).Google Scholar

Garlicki, Lech, ‘Politics and Political Independence of the Judiciary’ in Sajó, András and Bentch, L. R. (eds.), Judicial Integrity (Brill Academic Publishers 2004).Google Scholar

Garoupa, Nuno and Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence’ (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 103.Google Scholar

Garoupa, Nuno and Ginsburg, Tom, ‘The Comparative Law and Economics of Judicial Councils’ (2009) 27 Berkeley Journal of International Law 53.Google Scholar

Garoupa, Nuno and Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Hybrid Judicial Career Structures: Reputation Versus Legal Tradition’ (2011) 3 Journal of Legal Analysis 411.Google Scholar

Garoupa, Nuno and Maldonado, Maria, ‘The Judiciary in Political Transitions: The Critical Role of U.S. Constitutionalism in Latin America’ (2011) 19 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 593.Google Scholar

Georgakopoulos, Nicholas, ‘Independence in the Career and Recognition Judiciary’ (2000) 7 University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 205.Google Scholar

Gibson, James, ‘Judicial Institutions’ in Rhodes, R. A. W. and others (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (USA, OUP 2006).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, ‘Remarks on Writing Separately’ (1990) 65 Washington Law Review 133.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Comparative Administrative Procedure: Evidence from Northeast Asia’ (2002) 13 Constitutional Political Economy 247.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (CUP, 2003).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Pitfalls of Measuring the Rule of Law’ (2011) 3 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 269.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Courts and New Democracies: Recent Works’ (2012) 37 Law & Social Inquiry 720.Google Scholar

Siri, Gloppen and others, Courts and Power in Latin America and Africa (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar

Griffen, Wendell L., ‘Judicial Accountability and Discipline’ (1998) 61 Law and Contemporary Problems 75.Google Scholar

Guarnieri, Carlo and Pederzoli, Patrizia, The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy (OUP, 2002).Google Scholar

Guarnieri, Carlo, ‘Appointment and Career of Judges in Continental Europe: The Rise of Judicial Self- Government’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies 169.Google Scholar

Guarnieri, Carlo, Judicial Independence in Europe: Threat or Resource for Democracy? (2013) 49 Representation 347.Google Scholar

Haley, John O., ‘The Japanese Judiciary: Maintaining Integrity, Autonomy, and the Public Trust in Law’ in Foote, Daniel H. (ed.), Law in Japan: A Turning Point (University of Washington Press 2008).Google Scholar

Hammergren, Linn A., ‘Do Judicial Councils Further Judicial Reform? Lessons from Latin America Carnegie Endowment Rule of Law Series’ Working Paper No. 28, 2002.Google Scholar

Hanley, Sean, ‘Dynamics of New Party Formation in the Czech Republic 1996–2010: Looking for the Origins of a “Political Earthquake’ (2012) 28 East European Politics 119.Google Scholar

Haughton, Tim, ‘Exit Choice and Legacy: Explaining the Patterns of Party Politics in Post-communist Slovakia’ (2014) 30 East European Politics 210.Google Scholar

Hazard, John, Communists and Their Law (University of Chicago Press, 1969).Google Scholar

He, Xin, ‘Black Hole of Responsibility: The Adjudication Committee’s Role in a Chinese Court’ (2012) 46 Law & Society Review 681.Google Scholar

He, Xin, ‘Judicial Innovation and Local Politics: Judicialization of Administrative Governance in East China’ (2013) 69 China Journal 1.Google Scholar

Henderson, M. Todd, ‘From Seriatim to Consensus and Back Again: A Theory of Dissent’ (2007) Supreme Court Review 283.Google Scholar

Hendley, Kathryn, ‘“Telephone Law” and the “Rule of Law”: The Russian Case’ (2009) 1 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 241.Google Scholar

Higgins, Richard S. and Rubin, Paul H., ‘Judicial Discretion’ (1980) 9 Journal of Legal Studies 129.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa, Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile (CUP, 2007).Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa, ‘Agents of Anti-Politics: Courts in Pinochet’s Chile’ in Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir (eds.), Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (CUP 2008).Google Scholar

Hille, Kathrin, ‘Putin tightens grip on legal systém’ Financial Times (London, November 27, 2013).Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’ (2005) 53 American Journal of Comparative Law 125.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts’ (2008) 11 Annual Review of Political Science 93.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, ‘Judicial Independence as Ambiguous Reality and Insidious Illusion’ in Dworkin, Ronald (ed.), From Liberal Values to Democratic Transition: Essays in Honor of János Kis (Central European University Press 2004).Google Scholar

Hriptievschi, Nadejda and Hanganu, Sorin, ‘Judicial Independence in Moldova’, in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012), 1119–1196.Google Scholar

Huybrechts, Luc, ‘A Commentary Lasser’s Analysis from the Belgian Court of Cassation’s Perspective’ in Huls, Nick and others (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Rulings: Judicial Deliberations and Beyond (T.M.C. Asser Press 2009).Google Scholar

Iancu, Bogdan, ‘Constitutionalism in Perpetual Transition: The Case of Romania’ in Iancu, Bogdan (ed.), The Law/Politics Distinction in Contemporary Public Law Adjudication (Eleven International Publishing 2009).Google Scholar

Innes, Abby, Czechoslovakia: The Short Goodbye (Yale University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki C., ‘Judicial Independence: Structure, Content, Attitude’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 19–86.Google Scholar

Jolowicz, John A. (ed.), Public Interest Parties and the Active Role of the Judge in Civil Litigation (Milano, Giuffrè 1974).Google Scholar

Kalt, Joseph P. and Zupan, Mark A., ‘Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics’ (1984) 74 American Economic Review 279.Google Scholar

Karlan, Pamela, ‘Electing Judges, Judging Elections, and the Lessons of Caperton’ (2009) 123 Harvard Law Review 80.Google Scholar

Kelsh, John P., ‘The Opinion Practices of the United States Supreme Court 1790–1945’ (1999) 77 Washington University Law Quarterly 137.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslav and Tóka, Gabor, Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation (CUP, 1999).Google Scholar

Klíma, Ivan, Judge on Trial (Knopf, 1993).Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry, EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality (Kluwer, 2008).Google Scholar

Kolomazníková, Jana and Navara, Luděk, ‘Pravým důvodem odvolání soudců je zřejmě jejich minulost’, IDnes.cz, March 17, 1999.Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan, ‘Judicial Lawmaking and Precedent in Supreme Courts: The European Court of Justice Compared to the US Supreme Court and the French Cour de Cassation’ (2008–2009) 11 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 399.Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan, ‘Questioning Judicial Deliberations’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 805.Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan, ‘When Umpires Strike Back: Some Distinctions between (Judicial) Lawmaking and Legislation’ in LAWTE (eds.), Liber Amicorum Tom Eijsbouts (Asser Press 2011).Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan, ‘Institutional Dimension of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond 231 (Hart Publishing 2012).Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan, ‘Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedent’ (2013) 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 149.Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P., The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (2nd ed., Duke University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P., ‘Autonomy versus Accountability: The German Judiciary’ in Russell, Peter H. and O’Brien, David M. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World (University of Virginia Press 2001).Google Scholar

Kornhauser, Lewis, ‘Is Judicial Independence a Useful Concept?’ in Burbank, Stephen B. and Friedman, Barry (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach (SAGE Publications 2002).Google Scholar

Kosař, David, ‘Lustration and Lapse of Time: Dealing with the Past in the Czech Republic’ (2008) 4 European Constitutional Law Review 460.Google Scholar

Kosař, David, ‘Conflicts between Fundamental Rights in the Jurisprudence of the Czech Constitutional Court’ in Brems, Eva (ed.), Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights (Intersentia 2008).Google Scholar

Kosař, David, ‘Transitional Justice and Judicial Accountability: Lessons from the Czech Republic and Slovakia’ (2010) (unpublished manuscript, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1689260).Google Scholar

Kosař, David, ‘The Least Accountable Branch’ (Review Essay) (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 234.Google Scholar

Kosař, David, ‘Rozvrh práce: opomíjený předpoklad soudcovské nezávislosti a klíčový nástroj pro boj s korupcí soudců’ [Case Assignment: The Overlooked Precondition of Judicial Independence and the Tool Against Judicial Corruption], (2014) 153 Právník 1049.Google Scholar

Koslosky, Daniel Ryan, ‘Toward an Interpretive Model of Judicial Independence: A Case Study of Eastern Europe’ (2009) 31 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 203.Google Scholar

Kostelanský, Ľuboš and Vavrová, Vanda, Harabinovi sudcovia zarobili viac ako premiér, Pravda, August 12, 2010.Google Scholar

Kovačechová, Eva and Wilfling, Peter (eds.), Presvedčivosť a transparentnosť rozhodovania súdov, VIA IURIS, 2012.Google Scholar

Kovačechová, Eva and Čaputová, Zuzana (eds.), Vybrané aspekty disciplinárního súdnictva, VIA IURIS, 2012.Google Scholar

Kozinski, Alex, ‘The Many Faces of Judicial Independence’ (1998) 14 Georgia State University Law Review 861.Google Scholar

Kronman, Anthony T., Max Weber (Stanford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Kubík, Pavol, Bez podateľne: Štefan Harabin sa už pre zákony netrápi, TREND, March 10, 2010 (available at: www.etrend.sk/trend-archiv/rok-2010/cislo-10/bez-podatelne.html).Google Scholar

Kubík, Pavol, Keď losuje Štefan Harabin: Na Najvyššom súde majú rozhodnutia predsedu občas väčšiu váhu ako paragrafy, TREND, March 11, 2010 (available at: http://ekonomika.etrend.sk/ekonomika-slovensko/ked-losuje-stefan-harabin-2.html).Google Scholar

Kubík, Pavol, Najvyšší reaguje: Sedem trestných sudcov tvrdí, že spisy dostávajú “neexistujúce senáty”, TREND, March 17, 2010 (available at: www.etrend.sk/trend-archiv/rok-2010/cislo-11/najvyssi-reaguje.html).Google Scholar

Kubík, Pavol and Múčka, František, úraduje, Ako Štefan, I. Čistič: Pôsobenie nového šéfa Najvyššieho súdu SR varuje pred rozširovaním jeho kompetencií, TREND, September 30, 2009 (available at: http://ekonomika.etrend.sk/ekonomika-slovensko/ako-uraduje-stefan-i-cistic-2.html).Google Scholar

Kühn, Zdeněk, ‘Worlds Apart: Western and Central European Judicial Culture at the Onset of the European Enlargement’ (2004) 52 American Journal of Comparative Law 531.Google Scholar

Kühn, Zdeněk, ‘The Authoritarian Legal Culture at Work: The Passivity of Parties and the Interpretational Statements of Supreme Courts’ (2006) 2 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 19.Google Scholar

Kühn, Zdeněk, ‘Historický a komparativní kontext domácí diskuse o postavení soudní moci’ in Kysela, Jan (ed.), Hledání optimálního modelu správy soudnictví pro Českou republiku (Kancelář Senátu 2008).Google Scholar

Kühn, Zdeněk, ‘The Democratization and Modernization of Post-Communist Judiciaries’ in Febbrajo, Alberto and Sadurski, Wojciech (eds.), Central and Eastern Europe After Transition (Ashgate 2010).Google Scholar

Kühn, Zdeněk, The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? (Brill, 2011).Google Scholar

Kühn, Zdeněk, ‘Judicial Administration Reforms in Central-Eastern Europe: Lessons to be Learned’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Kühn, Zdeněk and Baňouch, Hynek, ‘O publikaci a citaci judikatury aneb proč je někdy judikatura jako císařovy nové šaty’ (2005) 13 Právní rozhledy 484.Google Scholar

Künnecke, Martina, ‘The Accountability and Independence of Judges: German Perspectives’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Künnecke, Martina, Tradition and Change in Administrative Law an Anglo-German Comparison (Springer, 2007).Google Scholar

Kyritsis, Dimitrios, ‘Representation and Waldron’s Objection to Judicial Review’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 733.Google Scholar

Kysela, Jan (ed.), Hledání optimálního modelu správy soudnictví pro Českou republiku (Kancelář Senátu 2008).Google Scholar

Landler, Mark, ‘German Judge Cites Koran, Stirring Up Cultural Storm’ New York Times (New York, March 23, 2007).Google Scholar

Langbroek, Philip M. and Fabri, Marco, The Right Judge for Each Case: A Study of Case Assignment and Impartiality in Six European Judiciaries (Intersentia, 2007).Google Scholar

Lange, Vera, ‘Public Interest in Civil Law, Socialist Law, and Common Law Systems: The Role of the Public Prosecutor’ (1988) 36 American Journal of Comparative Law 279.Google Scholar

Larenz, Carl and Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft (3rd ed., Springer 1995).Google Scholar

Larkins, Christopher M., ‘Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis’ (1996) 44 The American Journal of Comparative Law 612.Google Scholar

L’E Lasser, Mitchel de S. O., Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (OUP, 2004).Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’État (Polity, 2010), available also in French (La Fabrique de Droit: Une ethnographie du Conseil d’État (2002)).Google Scholar

Law, David, ‘The Anatomy of a Conservative Court: Judicial Review in Japan’ (2009) 87 Texas Law Review 1545.Google Scholar

Law, David, ‘How to Rig the Federal Courts’ (2011) 99 Georgetown Law Journal 779.Google Scholar

Law, David, ‘Judicial Independence’ in Bertrand Badie and others (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Science Vol. 5 (SAGE 2011).Google Scholar

Le Sueur, Andrew, ‘Developing Mechanisms for Judicial Accountability’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Ledeneva, Alena, ‘From Russia with Blat: Can Informal Networks Help Modernize Russia?’ (2009) 76 Social Research 257.Google Scholar

Lemaire, Philippe, ‘Le Contrôle Fonctionnel de Gestion (1)’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Levine, Michael E., ‘Regulation, the Market, and Interest Group Cohesion: Why Airlines Were Not Reregulated’ in Landy, Marc K., Levin, Martin A., and Shapiro, Martin (eds.), Creating Competitive Markets: The Politics of Regulatory Reform (Brookings 2007).Google Scholar

Levitt, Stephen Ross, ‘The Life and Times of a Local Court Judge in Berlin’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 169.Google Scholar

Li, Ling, ‘The “Production” of Corruption in China’s Courts: Judicial Politics and Decision Making in a One-Party State’ (2012) 37 Law & Social Inquiry 848.Google Scholar

Li, William and others, ‘Using Algorithmic Attribution Techniques to Determine Authorship in Unsigned Judicial Opinions’ (2013) 16 Stanford Technology Law Review 503.Google Scholar

Lichovník, Tomáš, the President of the Judicial Union, expressed this opinion on a nationwide TV channel; see ‘Ministerstvo vydalo seznam soudců z KSČ, čtyři jména poté vyškrtlo’ (Česká televize, January 7, 2011) (available at: www.ceskatelevize.cz:8001/ct24/domaci/111953-ministerstvo-vydalo-seznam-soudcu-z-ksc-ctyri-jmena-pote-vyskrtlo/).Google Scholar

Ligi, Timo, ‘Judicial Independence in Estonia’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 739–791.Google Scholar

Lipovský, Milan, ‘Sťažnosť pre porušenie zákona a konanie o nej – niekoľko poznámok’ (2004) 56 Justičná revue 671.Google Scholar

Loth, Marc A., ‘Courts in Quest for Legitimacy: A Comparative Approach’ in Malsch, Marijke and van Manen, Niels (eds.), De begrijpelijkheid van de rechtspraak (Boom Juridische Uitgevers 2007).Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Matthew D., The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Lynn, Jonathan, ‘Czech Republic Called Potential Economic Tiger’ Journal of Commerce (September 2, 1993).Google Scholar

Mackenroth, Geert W. and Teetzmann, H., ‘Selbstverwaltung der Justiz: Markenzeichen zukunftsfähiger Rechtsstaaten’ (2002) Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 337.Google Scholar

Mak, Elaine, ‘The European Judicial Organisation in a New Paradigm: The Influence of Principles of “New Public Management” on the Organisation of the European Courts’ (2008) 14 European Law Journal 718.Google Scholar

Malaurie, Philippe and Morvan, Patrick, Droit civil: introduction générale (2nd ed., Defrénois, 2005).Google Scholar

Malleson, Kate and Russell, Peter H. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World (University of Toronto Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Mance, Lord, ‘External Institutional Control over Judges’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Markham, James, ‘Against Individually Signed Judicial Opinions’ (2006) 56 Duke Law Journal 923, 930 (quoting Letter from President Thomas Jefferson to Justice William Johnson (October 27, 1820)).Google Scholar

Markovits, Inga, ‘Children of a Lesser God: GDR Lawyers in Post-Socialist Germany’ (1996) 94 Michigan Law Review.Google Scholar

Markovits, Inga, Justice in Lüritz (Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Mashaw, Jerry, ‘Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance’ in Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences (CUP 2006).Google Scholar

Massot, Jean and Girardot, Thierry, Le Conseil d’État (1999).Google Scholar

McAdams, A. James, ‘Transitional Justice: The Issue that Won’t Go Away’ (2011) 5 International Journal of Transitional Justice 304.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew D. and Schwartz, Thomas, ‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms’ (1984) 28 American Journal of Political Science 165.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger G. and Weingast, Barry R., ‘Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control’ (1987) 3 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 243.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger G. and Weingast, Barry R., ‘Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies’ (1989) 75 Virginia Law Review 431.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger G. and Weingast, Barry R., ‘Political Control of the Bureaucracy’ in Newman, Peter (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Law and Economics (Palgrave Macmillan 1998).Google Scholar

Mendelski, Martin and Libman, Alexander, History Matters, but How? An Example of Ottoman and Habsburg Legacies and Judicial Performance in Romania, Frankfurt School Working Paper No. 175 (September 30, 2011).Google Scholar

Merryman, John Henry and Perez-Perdomo, Rogelio. The Civil Law Tradition? An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (3rd ed., Stanford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Mihočková, Eva, Šikanovanie v talári, Plus 7 dní, December 12, 2011 (available at: www.pluska.sk/plus7dni/vsimli-sme-si/sikanovanie-vtalari.html).Google Scholar

Minder, Raphael, ‘Spain’s Chief Justice Quits over Claims of Misusing Public Money’ The New York Times (New York, June 21, 2012).Google Scholar

de Secondat Montesquieu, Charles, The Spirit of the Laws, Vol. 11 (first published 1748, CUP, 1989).Google Scholar

Morgan, Glenn G., Soviet Administrative Legality: The Role of Attorney General’s Office (Stanford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Motejl, Otakar, ‘Soudnictví a jeho správa’ in Bobek, Michal, et al. (eds.), Komunistické právo v Československu (MUNI Press 2009).Google Scholar

Mulgan, Richard, Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies (Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar

Müller, Lydia F., ‘Judicial Independence as a Council of Europe Standard’ (2009) 52 German Yearbook of International Law 461.Google Scholar

Müller, Lydia F., ‘Judicial Administration in Transitional Eastern Countries’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 937–969.Google Scholar

Nedelsky, Nadya, ‘The Wartime Slovak State: A Case Study in the Relationship between Ethnic Nationalism and Authoritarian Patterns of Governance’ (2001) 7 Nations and Nationalism 215.Google Scholar

Nedelsky, Nadya, ‘Divergent Responses to a Common Past: Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia’ (2004) 33 Theory and Society 65.Google Scholar

Nedelsky, Nadya, ‘Czechoslovakia, and the Czech and Slovak Republics’ in Stan, Lavinia (ed.), Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the communist past (Routledge 2008)Google Scholar

Neudorf, Lorne, ‘Promoting Independent Justice in a Changing World’ (2012) 12 Human Rights Law Review 107.Google Scholar

Ng, Gar Yein, Quality of Judicial Organisation and Checks and Balances (Intersentia, 2007).Google Scholar

Nonet, Philippe and Selznick, Philip, Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law (Transaction Publishers, 2001).Google Scholar

Nuβberger, Angelika, ‘Judicial Reforms in Post-Soviet Countries – Good Intentions with Flawed Results?’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

O’Brien, David M. and Ohkoshi, Yasuo, ‘Stifling Judicial Independence from Within: The Japanese Judiciary’ in Russell, Peter H. and O’Brien, David M. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World (University of Virginia Press 2001).Google Scholar

Ogul, Morris S. and Rockman, Bert A., ‘Overseeing Oversight: New Departures and Old Problems’ (1990) 15 Legislative Studies Quarterly 5.Google Scholar

Osakwe, Christopher, ‘Gordon B. Smith, The Soviet Procuracy and the Supervision of Administration (Book Review)’ (1980) 28 American Journal of Comparative Law 700.Google Scholar

Orzoff, Andrea, Battle for the Castle: The Myth of Czechoslovakia in Europe, 1914–1948 (OUP, 2009).Google Scholar

Papier, Hans-Jürgen, ‘Zur Selbstverwaltung der Dritten Gewalt’ (2002) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2585.Google Scholar

Parau, Cristina, ‘Piana, Daniela (2010) Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe: From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice (Book Review)’ (2011) 45 Law & Society Review 791.Google Scholar

Parau, Cristina, ‘The Drive for Judicial Supremacy’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Parau, Cristina, ‘The Dormancy of Parliaments: The Invisible Cause of Judiciary Empowerment in Central and Eastern Europe’ (2013) 49 Representation – Journal of Representative Democracy 267.Google Scholar

Parau, Cristina, ‘Explaining judiciary governance in Central and Eastern Europe: External Incentives, Transnational Elites and Parliament Inaction’ (2015) 67 Europe-Asia Studies 409.Google Scholar

Partlett, William, ‘Judicial Backsliding in Russia’, JURIST – Academic Commentary, September 30, 2014 (available at: http://jurist.org/academic/2014/09/william-partlett-russia-reform).Google Scholar

Paterson, Alan, ‘The Scottish Judicial Appointments Board: New Wine in Old Bottles?’ in Malleson, Kate and Russell, Peter H. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World (University of Toronto Press 2006).Google Scholar

Paterson, Alan, Lawyers and the Public Good: Democracy in Action? (CUP, 2011).Google Scholar

Peerenboom, Randall (ed.), Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion (CUP, 2009).Google Scholar

Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio, ‘Independence and Accountability’ in Van Puymbroeck, Rudolf V. (ed.), Comprehensive Legal and Judicial Development: Towards an Agenda for a Just and Equitable Society in the 21st Century (World Bank Publications 2001).Google Scholar

Perju, Vlad, ‘Reason and Authority in the European Court of Justice’ (2009) 49 Virginia Journal of International Law 307.Google Scholar

Philp, Mark, ‘Delimiting Democratic Accountability’ (2009) 57 Political Studies 28.Google Scholar

Piana, Daniela, ‘The Power Knocks at the Courts’ Back Door – Two Waves of Postcommunist Judicial Reforms’ (2009) 42 Comparative Political Studies 816.Google Scholar

Piana, Daniela, Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe: From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice (Ashgate, 2010).Google Scholar

Piana, Daniela and Vauchez, Antoine, Il Consiglio superiore della magistratura (Il Mulino 2012).Google Scholar

Picardi, Nicola, ‘La Ministère de la Justice et les autres modèles d´administration de la justice en Europe’ in Longo, Giovanni E. (ed.), L’indipendenza della giustizia, oggi (Judicial independence today: liber amicorum in onore di Giovanni E. Longo 1999).Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel, The Concept of Representation (University of California Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Piussi, Zuzana, ‘Nemoc tretej moci’ [The Disease of the Third Branch], 2011, [Slovakia, 52 min.]Google Scholar

Pokol, Béla, ‘Judicial Power and Democratization in Eastern Europe’ in Proceedings of the Conference Europeanisation and Democratisation: The Southern European Experience and the Perspective for the New Member States of the Enlarged Europe (2005).Google Scholar

Popescu, Delia, Political Action in Václav Havel’s Thought: The Responsibility of Resistance (Lexington Books, 2011).Google Scholar

Popova, Maria, ‘Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine’ (2010) 43 Comparative Political Studies 1202.Google Scholar

Popova, Maria, ‘Be Careful What You Wish For: A Cautionary Tale of Post-Communist Judicial Empowerment’ (2010) 18 Demokratizatsiya 56.Google Scholar

Popova, Maria, Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine (CUP 2012).Google Scholar

Popova, Maria, ‘Why the Bulgarian Judiciary Does Not Prosecute Corruption?’ (2012) 59 Problems of Post Communism 35.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A., ‘Agency Models in Law and Economics’ in Posner, Eric A. (ed.), Chicago Lectures in Law and Economics (Foundation Press 2000).Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A., ‘What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does)’ (1993) 3 Supreme Court Economic Review 1.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A., The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform (Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A., How Judges Think (Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Prado, Mariana Mota, ‘The Paradox of Rule of Law Reforms: How Early Reforms Can Create Obstacles to Future Ones’ (2010) 60 University of Toronto Law Journal 555.Google Scholar

Prado, Mariana and Trebilcock, Michael, ‘Path Dependence, Development, and the Dynamics of Institutional Reform’ (2009) 47 University of Toronto Law Journal 341.Google Scholar

Procházka, Radoslav, Mission Accomplished: On Founding Constitutional Adjudication in Central Europe (CEU Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Rácz, Attila, Courts and Tribunals: A Comparative Study (Akadémia Kiadó, 1980).Google Scholar

Ramseyer, J. Mark, ‘The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach’ (1994) 23 The Journal of Legal Studies 721.Google Scholar

Ramseyer, J. Mark and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, Japan’s Political Marketplace (rev. ed., Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Ramseyer, J. Mark and Rasmusen, Eric, Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan (University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Ray, Laura Krugman, ‘The Road to Bush v. Gore: The History of The Supreme Court’s Use of the Per Curiam Opinion’ (2000) 79 Nebraska Law Review 517.Google Scholar

Raynaud, Philippe, ‘La loi et la jurisprudence, des lumières à la révolution française’ (1985) 30 Archives de philosophie du droit 61.Google Scholar

Reed, Robert, ‘Le contrôle informel: L’institution judiciaire, les juges et la societé (1)’ [Informal Control: The Judiciary, Judges and Society (1)], in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Renoux, Thierry S. (ed.), Les Conseils superieurs de la magistrature en Europe (La documentation francaise 1999).Google Scholar

Renoux, Thierry, ‘Juges et magistrats’ in Renoux, Thierry (ed.), La Justice en France (La documentation française 2013).Google Scholar

Riedel, Johannes, ‘Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Germany’ in Di Federico, Giuseppe (ed.), Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe (IRSIG-CNR 2005) 69–126.Google Scholar

Roach, K., ‘Dialogue or Defiance: Legislative Reversals of Supreme Court Decisions in Canada and the United States’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 347.Google Scholar

Robbins, Ira P., ‘Hiding behind the Cloak of Invisibility: The Supreme Court and Per Curiam Opinions’ (2012) 86 Tulane Law Review 1197.Google Scholar

Rohárik, Pavol, ‘The Judiciary and Its Transition in Slovakia after 1989’, in Přibáň, Jiří, Roberts, Pauline, and Young, James (eds.), Systems of Justice in Transition: Central European Experiences since 1989 (Ashgate 2003).Google Scholar

Romzek, Barbara S., ‘Enhancing Accountability’ in Perry, James L. (ed.), Handbook of Public Administration. (2nd ed., Jossey Bass 1996).Google Scholar

Russell, Peter H and O’Brien, David (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World (University of Virginia Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Rychetský, Pavel, ‘Pohled ministrů spravedlnosti’ in Kysela, Jan (ed.) Hledání optimálního modelu správy soudnictví pro Českou republiku (Kancelář Senátu 2008) 20–24.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech, Rights before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Springer, 2005).Google Scholar

Savage, Charlie, ‘A Judge’s View of Judging Is on the Record’ The New York Times (New York, May 15, 2009).Google Scholar

Schedler, Andreas, ‘Conceptualizing Accountability’ in Schedler, Andreas and others (eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (Lynne Rienner Publishers 1999) 13.Google Scholar

Schedler, Andreas and others (eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999).Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Declarations of Independence: Judicial Responses to Political Pressure’ in Burbank, Stephen B. and Friedman, Barry (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach (SAGE Publications 2002).Google Scholar

Schönfeld, Karel, ‘Rex, Lex et Judex: Montesquieu and la bouche de la loi Revisited’ (2008) 4 European Constitutional Law Review 274.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Herman, The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Schwartz, Olga and Sykiainen, Elga, ‘Judicial Independence in the Russian Federation’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 971–1064.Google Scholar

Sedley, Stephen in Foreword to Michael Addo (ed.), Freedom of Expression and the Criticism of Judges: A Comparative Study of European Legal Standards (Ashgate 2000).Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J., The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (CUP 2002).Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘Constitutional Guarantees of Judicial Independence in Germany’ in Riedel, Eibe H. and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Recent Trends in German and European Constitutional Law (Springer 2006) 267–288.Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘Judicial Independence in European Union Accessions: The Emergence of a European Basic Principle’ (2009) 52 German Yearbook of International Law 405.Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘European Perspective on the Rule of Law and Independent Courts’ (2012) 20 Journal für Rechtspolitik 337.Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘Judicial Independence in Germany’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 447–519.Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘Judicial Independence – The Normativity of an Evolving Transnational Principle’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 1279–1360.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Shetreet, Shimon, Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate (Springer, 1985).Google Scholar

Shetreet, Shimon and Forsyth, Christopher, The Culture of Judicial Independence (Brill, 2011).Google Scholar

Shetreet, Shimon and Turenne, Sophie, Judges on Trial: Independence and Accountability of the English Judiciary (2nd ed., CUP 2013).Google Scholar

Singh, M. P., ‘Securing the Independence of the Judiciary: The Indian Experience’ (2000) 10 Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 245.Google Scholar

Smilov, Daniel, ‘EU Enlargement and the Constitutional Principle of Judicial Independence’ in Sadurski, Wojciech, et al. (eds.), Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law?: The Impact of EU Enlargement on the Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Legal Orders (Springer 2006).Google Scholar

Smith, Gordon B., The Soviet Procuracy and the Supervision of Administration (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1978).Google Scholar

Soeharno, Jonathan, The Integrity of the Judge: A Philosophical Inquiry (Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar

Solomon, Peter H., ‘Authoritarian Legality and Informal Practices: Judges, Lawyers and the State in Russia and China’ (2010) 43 Communist and Post-Communist Studies 351.Google Scholar

Solomon, Peter H., ‘The Accountability of Judges in Post Communist States: From Bureaucratic to Professional Accountability’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012) 909–935.Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence, ‘Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centred Theory of Judging’ (2003) 34 Metaphilosophy 178.Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence, ‘A Tournament of Virtue’ (2004) 32 Florida State University Law Review 1365.Google Scholar

Sólyom, László, ‘The Separation of Powers Is Integral to the Fabric of Democracy’ (2013) 7 Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law 159.Google Scholar

Staroňová, Katarína, ‘Projekt “Súdny manažment” ako protikorupčný nástroj’ in Sičáková-Beblavá, Emília and Beblavý, Miroslav (eds.), Jedenásť statočných: prípadové študie protikorupčných nástrojov na Slovensku (Transparency International Slovensko 2008).Google Scholar

Stibořík, Vladimír, ‘Všechno jsem soudil podle svědomí’ interview (Mladá fronta DNES, March 18, 2010) 2 (attached to Luděk Navara, ‘Šéf vrchního soudu rozhodoval v 80. letech v politických procesech’ in Vladimír Stibořík, ‘Všechno jsem soudil podle svědomí’ interview (Mladá fronta DNES, March 18, 2010)) (available at: http://zpravy.idnes.cz/sef-vrchniho-soudu-rozhodoval-v-80-letech-v-politickych-procesech-phs-/domaci.aspx?c=A100317_215456_domaci_abr).Google Scholar

Stirn, Bernard, Le Conseil d’État: Son rôle, sa jurisprudence [The Conseil d’État: Its Role and Jurisprudence] (Hachette 1991).Google Scholar

Strom, Kaare, ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies’ (2000) 37 European Journal of Political Research 261.Google Scholar

Suli, Zhu, ‘The Party and the Courts’ in Peerenboom, Randall (ed.), Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion (CUP 2009), 52–68.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R, ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements’ (1995) 108 Harvard Law Review 1733.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., ‘If People Would Be Outraged by Their Rulings, Should Judges Care?’ (2007) 60 Stanford Law Review 155.Google Scholar

Sutton, Jeffrey, ‘A Review of Richard A. Posner, How Judges Think (2008)’ (2010) 108 Michigan Law Review 859.Google Scholar

Svák, Ján, ‘Slovenská skúsenosť s optimalizáciou modelu správy súdnictva’ in Kysela, Jan (ed.) Hledání optimálního modelu správy soudnictví pro Českou republiku (Kancelář Senátu 2008).Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (OUP, 2000).Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone, ‘Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy’ in Thatcher, Mark and Sweet, Alec Stone (eds.), The Politics of Delegation (Routledge 2003).Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z., Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Tarr, G. Alan, Without Fear or Favor: Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in the States (Stanford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Thomas, E. W., The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles (CUP, 2005).Google Scholar

Thomas, James, Judicial Ethics in Australia (3rd ed., Reed International Books, 2009).Google Scholar

Toharia, José J., ‘Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain’ (1975) 9 Law & Society Review 475.Google Scholar

Transparency International, Global Corruption Report: Corruption in Judicial Systems (CUP, 2007)Google Scholar

Trochev, Alexei, Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics, 1990–2006 (CUP, 2008).Google Scholar

Trochev, Alexei, ‘Meddling with Justice: Competitive Politics, Impunity, and Distrusted Courts in Post-Orange Ukraine’ (2010) 18 Democratizatsiya 122.Google Scholar

Tucker, Aviezer and others, ‘From Republican Virtue to Technology of Political Power: Three Episodes of Czech Nonpolitical Politics’ (2000) 115 Political Science Quarterly 421.Google Scholar

Ulč, Otto, The Judge in a Communist State. A View from Within (Ohio University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Unger, Roberto, What Should Legal Analysis Become (Verso, 1998).Google Scholar

Upham, Frank K., ‘Political Lackeys or Faithful Public Servants: Two Views of the Japanese Judiciary’ (2005) 30 Law & Social Inquiry 421.Google Scholar

Urribarri, Raul A. Sanchez, ‘Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court’ (2011) 36 Law & Social Inquiry 854.Google Scholar

Uyterhoeven, Hugo, Richterliche Rechtsfindung und Rechtsvergleichung. Eine Vorstudie über die Rechtsvergleichung als Hilfsmittel der richterlichen Rechtsfindung im Privatrecht (Verlag Stämpfli, 1959).Google Scholar

Uzelac, Alan, ‘Role and Status of Judges in Croatia’ in Oberhammer, Paul (ed.), Richterbild und Rechtsreform in Mitteleuropa (Manzsche Verlags 2001) 23–65.Google Scholar

Uzelac, Alan, ‘Amendments to the Law on Courts and Law on the State Judicial Council – Elements of the Reform of the Organizational Judicial Legislation’ in Lalič, Goranka (ed.), Croation Judiciary: Lessons and Perspectives (Netherlands Helsinki Committee 2002) 37–69.Google Scholar

Uzelac, Alan, ‘Survival of the Third Legal Tradition?’ (2010) 49 Supreme Cour Law Review 377.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg, The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany (CUP 2005).Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg, ‘Establishing and Maintaining Judicial Independence’ in Whittington, Keith E., et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Vargas, Juan E. and Duce, Mauricio, Informe sobre independencia judicial en Chile (Due Process of Law Foundation, 2000).Google Scholar

Vashkevich, Alezander, ‘Judicial Independence in the Republic of Belarus’ in Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian, Judging under Uncertainty: An Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation (Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian, Judicial Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small (OUP, 2007).Google Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian, ‘The Judiciary Is A They, Not An It: Interpretive Theory and the Fallacy Of Division’ (2009) 14 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 549.Google Scholar

Voermans, Wim and Albers, Pim, ‘Councils for the Judiciary in EU Countries’ (Council of Europe, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Strasbourg 2003).Google Scholar

Voigt, Stefan, ‘The economic effects of judicial accountability: cross-country evidence’ (2008) 25 European Journal of Law and Economics 95.Google Scholar

Voigt, Stefan and Feld, Lars, ‘Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators’ (2003) 19 European Journal of Political Economy 497.Google Scholar

Voigt, Stefan and Feld, Lars, ‘Making Judges Independent – Some Proposals regarding the Judiciary’ in Congleton, Roger D. and Swedenborg, Birgitta (eds.), Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy – Analysis and Evidence (The MIT Press 2006).Google Scholar

Volcansek, Mary L. and others, Judicial Misconduct: A Cross-National Comparison (University Press of Florida, 1996).Google Scholar

Voltaire, Jean, Beuchot, Adrien Quentin, and Migerm, Pierre Auguste Œuvres de Voltaire, Volume 48 (Paris: Lefèvre, 1832).Google Scholar

Vorel, Jaroslav, Alena Šimáková a kol. Československá justice v letech 1948–1953 v dokumentech. Díl I. (Praha, Úřad dokumentace a vyšetřování zločinů komunismu 2003).Google Scholar

Wagnerová, Eliška, ‘Position of Judges in the Czech Republic’ in Přibáň, Jiří, Roberts, Pauline, and Young, James (eds.), Systems of Justice in Transition: Central European Experiences since 1989 (Ashgate 2003).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Dirty Little Secret’ (1998) 98 Columbia Law Review 510.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept?’ (2002) 21 Law and Philosophy 137.Google Scholar

Wallace, Clifford, ‘Comparative Perspectives on the Office of Chief Justice’ (2005) 38 Cornell International Law Journal 219.Google Scholar

Wasby, Stephen L. and others, ‘The Per Curiam Opinion: Its Nature and Functions’ (1992) 76 Judicature 29.Google Scholar

Weber, Jean-Francois, ‘Conseil supérieur de la magistrature (CSM)’ in Renoux, Thierry (ed.), La Justice en France (La documentation française 2013).Google Scholar

Weber, Jean-Francois, ‘Éthique, déontologiques et responsabilité des magistrats’ in Renoux, Thierry (ed.), La Justice en France (La documentation française 2013).Google Scholar

Weber, Max, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Shils, Edward and Finch, Henry A. trs., Free Press 1949) 90.Google Scholar

White, Brent T., ‘Rotten to the Core: Project Capture and the Failure of Judicial Reform in Mongolia’ (2009) 4 East Asia Law Reform 209.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith, ‘Legislative Sanctions and the Strategic Environment of Judicial Review’ (2003) 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 446.Google Scholar

Woodhouse, Diana, ‘Judicial Independence and Accountability within the United Kingdom’s New Constitutional Settlement’ in Canivet, Guy, Andenas, Mads, and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2006).Google Scholar

Woratsch, Günter, Zpráva o stavu slovenské justice – fenomén Štefan Harabin, Pecs, April 23, 2011.Google Scholar

Yusuf, Hakeem, Transitional Justice, Judicial Accountability and the Rule of Law (Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar

Žáček, Pavel, ‘“Sachergate”: první lustrační aféra’, Paměť a dějiny, No. 01/2007.Google Scholar

Žák, Václav, ‘Economists or Lawyers: Institutional Foundations of Emerging Democracy: The Czechoslovak example’ in Sorensen, Lene Bogh and Eliason, Leslie C. (eds.), Fascism, Liberalism, and Social Democracy in Central Europe: Past and Present (Aarhus University Press 2002).Google Scholar

Zimmer, Markus, ‘Judicial Independence in Central and East Europe: The Institutional Context’ (2006) 14 Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law 53.Google Scholar

‘Councils for the Judiciary: States without a High Council’ preliminary report (CCJE 2007) 4, Strasbourg, March 19, 2007.Google Scholar

‘In the Shadows: A Look into the Texas Supreme Court’s Overuse of Anonymous Opinions’ (Texas Watch, May 2008) (available at: www.texaswatch.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/PerCuriamReportFinal.pdf) 1).Google Scholar

‘Mezi soudci z KSČ se ocitli neprávem. Zvažují žaloby’ (Lidové noviny, January 12, 2011).Google Scholar

1998 Accession Progress Report on the Czech Republic.Google Scholar

1999 Accession Progress Report on Slovakia.Google Scholar

2000 Accession Progress Report on Slovakia.Google Scholar

2002 Accession Progress Report on the Czech Republic.Google Scholar

Agenda 2000 – Commission Opinion on the Czech Republic’s Application for Membership of the European Union, DOC/97/17 (Brussels, July 15, 1997).Google Scholar

Beschluss ‘Selbstverwaltung’ der Bundesvertreterversammlung des Deutschen Richterbundes [Motion for Self-Administration by the Assembly of Federal Representatives of the German Association of Judges], adopted on November 15, 2002 in Kiel (summary of the motion published in Neue Juristiche Wochenschrift 2002, Heft 42, XXVII–XXXIV).Google Scholar

‘Bude ministerka Žitňanská rešpektovať názory Lorda Justice Thomasa?’, Dimenzie, No. 10/2010.Google Scholar

CEPEJ, European judicial systems, Edition 2010 (data 2008): Efficiency and quality of justice (hereinafter “the 2010 CEPEJ Report”).Google Scholar

CEPEJ, European judicial systems, Edition 2012 (data 2010): Efficiency and quality of justice (hereinafter “the 2012 CEPEJ Report”).Google Scholar

Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R (94) 12, October 13, 1994 in: ‘37 Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1994) 453.Google Scholar

Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of John G. Roberts, Jr. to be Chief Justice of the United States Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 109th Cong. 55 (2005) (statement of John G. Roberts, Jr., Nominee to be Chief Justice of the United States).Google Scholar

Conseil Supérieur de la Magistrature: Recueil des obligations déontologiques des magistrats. Édition 2010, Dalloz-Sirey, 2010Google Scholar

Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE), Opinion no.10 (2007) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the Council for the Judiciary at the service of society (Strasbourg, November 21–23, 2007).Google Scholar

Alessia Di Pascale and Pier Luigi di Bari, ‘Completed Questionnaire for the project Contention National Report – Italy’ (2014) (available at: http://contention.eu/docs/country-reports/ItalyFinal.pdf).Google Scholar

Delenie spisov u Š. Harabina zákon neporušuje, konštatuje Súdna rada: Z kancelárie rady prišla po mesiaci odpoveď na otázky TRENDU, TREND, April 12, 2010 (available at: www.etrend.sk/ekonomika/delenie-spisov-u-harabina-zakon-neporusuje-konstatuje-sudna-rada.html)Google Scholar

European Charter on the Statute for Judges [Strasbourg, July 8–10, 1998].Google Scholar

Government of Montenegro, Action Plan: Chapter 23 Judiciary and Fundamental Rights, June 23, 2013.Google Scholar

Harabin odvolal predsedov súdov, spustil kontroly. Sme.sk, October 4, 2006, (available at: www.sme.sk/c/2929137/harabin-odvolal-predsedov-sudov-spustil-kontroly.html).Google Scholar

Harabin odvolal ďalších sudcov, Topky.sk, October 5, 2006 (available at: www.topky.sk/cl/10/127310/Harabin-odvolal-dalsich-sudcov).Google Scholar

Harabin sudcom napísal, koho bude voliť do Súdnej rady, Pravda.sk, May 24, 2012 (available at: http://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/174535-harabin-sudcom-napisal-koho-bude-volit-do-sudnej-rady/).Google Scholar

Harabin sudcom napísal, koho sa chystá voliť do súdnej rady, Aktuality.sk, May 24, 2012 (available at: www.aktuality.sk/clanok/207237/harabin-sudcom-napisal-koho-sa-chysta-volit-do-sudnej-rady/).Google Scholar

Judges fired for mismanagement, The Slovak Spectator, August 23, 1999 (available at: http://spectator.sme.sk/articles/view/3914/1/).Google Scholar

Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson (October 27, 1822).Google Scholar

Lietajuce spisy, TREND, April 28, 2010 (available at: www.etrend.sk/trend-archiv/rok-2010/cislo-17/lietajuce-spisy.html).Google Scholar

Minister spravodlivosti J. Liščák označil sudcov za “smradov” a “frackov blbých ako tágo”, Sme.sk, April 16, 1997 (available at: www.sme.sk/c/2071456/minister-spravodlivosti-j-liscak-oznacil-sudcov-za-smradov-a-frackov-blbych-ako-tago.html).Google Scholar

Minister Liščák zavádza a nemá dôveru sudcov, Sme.sk, May 5, 1997 (available at: www.sme.sk/c/2073444/minister-liscak-zavadza-a-nema-doveru-sudcov.html).Google Scholar

Ministerstvo chce opäť posilniť Najvyšší súd a Súdnu radu, Sme, May 19, 2010 (available at: www.sme.sk/c/5383676/ministerstvo-chce-opat-posilnit-najvyssi-sud-a-sudnu-radu.html).Google Scholar

Ministerstvo vydalo seznam soudců z KSČ, čtyři jména poté vyškrtlo’ (Česká televize, January 7, 2011) (available at: www.ceskatelevize.cz:8001/ct24/domaci/111953-ministerstvo-vydalo-seznam-soudcu-z-ksc-ctyri-jmena-pote-vyskrtlo/).Google Scholar

Odmeny udelené sudcom Najvyššieho súdu v roku 2002, Pravda, December 20, 2002.Google Scholar

Recommendation CM/Rec (2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on November 17, 2010.Google Scholar

Report on Civil Liability of Judges, International Association of Judges (IAJ-UIM), Study Commission II, 2003.Google Scholar

Resolution of The European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) on “Self Governance for the Judiciary: Balancing Independence and Accountability” (May 2008).Google Scholar

András Sajó, Courts as Representatives (lecture), November 18, 2012 (available at www.fljs.org).Google Scholar

Symposium Roundtable “An Exchange with Jeremy Waldron” published in International Journal of Constitutional Law (Volume 7, Issue 1, 2009).Google Scholar

The European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ), Councils for the Judiciary Report 2010–2011.Google Scholar

The Federalist No. 78, 464 (Alexander Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 2003).Google Scholar

Transparency International Slovensko (ed.), Výzvy slovenského súdnictva a možnosti zlepšenia existujúceho stavu (2010).Google Scholar

Transparency International Slovakia, Kto je s kým rodina na našich súdoch, Sme.sk (Bratislava, November 10, 2013).Google Scholar

U některých soudců pochybuji, jestli vůbec znají platné právo’ (Hospodářské noviny, September 9, 2011.Google Scholar

Un Juez Ante La Justicia [A Judge Before the Court], El Pais (Spec. Issue) (Spain) (available at: www.elpais.com/especial/caso-garzon/).Google Scholar

Wikileaks, cable 08PRAGUE499, CZECH JUSTICE SYSTEM: INCOMPLETE REFORMS.Google Scholar

‘Councils for the Judiciary: States without a High Council’ preliminary report (CCJE 2007) 4, Strasbourg, March 19, 2007.Google Scholar

‘In the Shadows: A Look into the Texas Supreme Court’s Overuse of Anonymous Opinions’ (Texas Watch, May 2008) (available at: www.texaswatch.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/PerCuriamReportFinal.pdf) 1).Google Scholar

‘Mezi soudci z KSČ se ocitli neprávem. Zvažují žaloby’ (Lidové noviny, January 12, 2011).Google Scholar

1998 Accession Progress Report on the Czech Republic.Google Scholar

1999 Accession Progress Report on Slovakia.Google Scholar

2000 Accession Progress Report on Slovakia.Google Scholar

2002 Accession Progress Report on the Czech Republic.Google Scholar

Agenda 2000 – Commission Opinion on the Czech Republic’s Application for Membership of the European Union, DOC/97/17 (Brussels, July 15, 1997).Google Scholar

Beschluss ‘Selbstverwaltung’ der Bundesvertreterversammlung des Deutschen Richterbundes [Motion for Self-Administration by the Assembly of Federal Representatives of the German Association of Judges], adopted on November 15, 2002 in Kiel (summary of the motion published in Neue Juristiche Wochenschrift 2002, Heft 42, XXVII–XXXIV).Google Scholar

‘Bude ministerka Žitňanská rešpektovať názory Lorda Justice Thomasa?’, Dimenzie, No. 10/2010.Google Scholar

CEPEJ, European judicial systems, Edition 2010 (data 2008): Efficiency and quality of justice (hereinafter “the 2010 CEPEJ Report”).Google Scholar

CEPEJ, European judicial systems, Edition 2012 (data 2010): Efficiency and quality of justice (hereinafter “the 2012 CEPEJ Report”).Google Scholar

Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R (94) 12, October 13, 1994 in: ‘37 Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1994) 453.Google Scholar

Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of John G. Roberts, Jr. to be Chief Justice of the United States Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 109th Cong. 55 (2005) (statement of John G. Roberts, Jr., Nominee to be Chief Justice of the United States).Google Scholar

Conseil Supérieur de la Magistrature: Recueil des obligations déontologiques des magistrats. Édition 2010, Dalloz-Sirey, 2010Google Scholar

Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE), Opinion no.10 (2007) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the Council for the Judiciary at the service of society (Strasbourg, November 21–23, 2007).Google Scholar

Alessia Di Pascale and Pier Luigi di Bari, ‘Completed Questionnaire for the project Contention National Report – Italy’ (2014) (available at: http://contention.eu/docs/country-reports/ItalyFinal.pdf).Google Scholar

Delenie spisov u Š. Harabina zákon neporušuje, konštatuje Súdna rada: Z kancelárie rady prišla po mesiaci odpoveď na otázky TRENDU, TREND, April 12, 2010 (available at: www.etrend.sk/ekonomika/delenie-spisov-u-harabina-zakon-neporusuje-konstatuje-sudna-rada.html)Google Scholar

European Charter on the Statute for Judges [Strasbourg, July 8–10, 1998].Google Scholar

Government of Montenegro, Action Plan: Chapter 23 Judiciary and Fundamental Rights, June 23, 2013.Google Scholar

Harabin odvolal predsedov súdov, spustil kontroly. Sme.sk, October 4, 2006, (available at: www.sme.sk/c/2929137/harabin-odvolal-predsedov-sudov-spustil-kontroly.html).Google Scholar

Harabin odvolal ďalších sudcov, Topky.sk, October 5, 2006 (available at: www.topky.sk/cl/10/127310/Harabin-odvolal-dalsich-sudcov).Google Scholar

Harabin sudcom napísal, koho bude voliť do Súdnej rady, Pravda.sk, May 24, 2012 (available at: http://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/174535-harabin-sudcom-napisal-koho-bude-volit-do-sudnej-rady/).Google Scholar

Harabin sudcom napísal, koho sa chystá voliť do súdnej rady, Aktuality.sk, May 24, 2012 (available at: www.aktuality.sk/clanok/207237/harabin-sudcom-napisal-koho-sa-chysta-volit-do-sudnej-rady/).Google Scholar

Judges fired for mismanagement, The Slovak Spectator, August 23, 1999 (available at: http://spectator.sme.sk/articles/view/3914/1/).Google Scholar

Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson (October 27, 1822).Google Scholar

Lietajuce spisy, TREND, April 28, 2010 (available at: www.etrend.sk/trend-archiv/rok-2010/cislo-17/lietajuce-spisy.html).Google Scholar

Minister spravodlivosti J. Liščák označil sudcov za “smradov” a “frackov blbých ako tágo”, Sme.sk, April 16, 1997 (available at: www.sme.sk/c/2071456/minister-spravodlivosti-j-liscak-oznacil-sudcov-za-smradov-a-frackov-blbych-ako-tago.html).Google Scholar

Minister Liščák zavádza a nemá dôveru sudcov, Sme.sk, May 5, 1997 (available at: www.sme.sk/c/2073444/minister-liscak-zavadza-a-nema-doveru-sudcov.html).Google Scholar

Ministerstvo chce opäť posilniť Najvyšší súd a Súdnu radu, Sme, May 19, 2010 (available at: www.sme.sk/c/5383676/ministerstvo-chce-opat-posilnit-najvyssi-sud-a-sudnu-radu.html).Google Scholar

Ministerstvo vydalo seznam soudců z KSČ, čtyři jména poté vyškrtlo’ (Česká televize, January 7, 2011) (available at: www.ceskatelevize.cz:8001/ct24/domaci/111953-ministerstvo-vydalo-seznam-soudcu-z-ksc-ctyri-jmena-pote-vyskrtlo/).Google Scholar

Odmeny udelené sudcom Najvyššieho súdu v roku 2002, Pravda, December 20, 2002.Google Scholar

Recommendation CM/Rec (2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on November 17, 2010.Google Scholar

Report on Civil Liability of Judges, International Association of Judges (IAJ-UIM), Study Commission II, 2003.Google Scholar

Resolution of The European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) on “Self Governance for the Judiciary: Balancing Independence and Accountability” (May 2008).Google Scholar

András Sajó, Courts as Representatives (lecture), November 18, 2012 (available at www.fljs.org).Google Scholar

Symposium Roundtable “An Exchange with Jeremy Waldron” published in International Journal of Constitutional Law (Volume 7, Issue 1, 2009).Google Scholar

The European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ), Councils for the Judiciary Report 2010–2011.Google Scholar

The Federalist No. 78, 464 (Alexander Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 2003).Google Scholar

Transparency International Slovensko (ed.), Výzvy slovenského súdnictva a možnosti zlepšenia existujúceho stavu (2010).Google Scholar

Transparency International Slovakia, Kto je s kým rodina na našich súdoch, Sme.sk (Bratislava, November 10, 2013).Google Scholar

U některých soudců pochybuji, jestli vůbec znají platné právo’ (Hospodářské noviny, September 9, 2011.Google Scholar

Un Juez Ante La Justicia [A Judge Before the Court], El Pais (Spec. Issue) (Spain) (available at: www.elpais.com/especial/caso-garzon/).Google Scholar

Wikileaks, cable 08PRAGUE499, CZECH JUSTICE SYSTEM: INCOMPLETE REFORMS.Google Scholar