Knight, M, Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, Neilson, J, Shakespeare, J, Kurinczuk, JJ (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care – Lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2014.Google Scholar

Department of Health: National Audit Office. Maternity services in England: Nov. 2013. London: Department of Health, 2013.Google Scholar

National Institute of Clinical Excellence. NICE Guideline 62 – Antenatal care Issued: March 2008 last modified: December 2014. From: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62.Google Scholar

Bar, J, Ben-Rafael, Z, Padoa, A, Orvieto, R, Boner, G, Hod, M. Prediction of pregnancy outcome in subgroups of women with renal disease. Clin Nephrol. 2000;53:437–444.Google ScholarPubMed

Smyth, A, Radovic, M, Garovic, V. Women, renal disease and pregnancy. Adv Chr Kidney Disease Dis. 2013 Sep: 20(5):402–410.Google Scholar

O’Flynn, N, Staniszewska, S. Improving the experience of care for people using NHS services: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2012;344:d6422.Google Scholar

Magee, H, Askham, J. Women’s views about the safety in maternity care: A qualitative study. London: King’s Fund, 2007.Google Scholar

Nursing and Midwifery Council. The code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. 2015. From: www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/NMC-Publications/revised-new-NMC-Code.pdf.Google Scholar

Berg, M, Dahlberg, K, A phenomenological study of women’s experiences of complicated childbirth. Midwifery 1998; 14:23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berg, M. The midwife–mother relationship. In Midwifery relationships with childbearing women at increased risk (2nd edn.). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2010, chapter 10.Google Scholar

Barry, MJ, Edgman-Levitan, S. Shared decision making – pinnacle of patient-centred care. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 366:780–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodwell, M. A patient’s perspective. British Journal of Renal Medicine 2013;18(1) Supplement: 6–7.Google Scholar

Department of Health. Maternity Services in England: National Audit Office 2013.Google Scholar

NHS Antenatal and Newborn Screening Programme, April 2017. Public Health England.Google Scholar

National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy: The management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. NICE guidelines [CG107] August 2010.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guidance for midwives, health visitors, pharmacists and other primary care services to improve the nutrition of pregnant and breastfeeding mothers and children in low income households. 2008.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top Guideline No 37a: Reducing the risk of thrombosis and embolism during pregnancy and puerperium. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press Nov 2009.Google Scholar

Lee, S, Ayers, S, Holden, D. A metasynthesis of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies. Midwifery 2014;30(4):403–411.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S, Nelson-Piercy, C. Management of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. BMJ 2011;342:d3606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2014). “CG190: Intrapartum care: Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth.” From: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: Management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Feb 2015.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.Google Scholar

NHS England. Statistical Release: Breastfeeding initiation and breastfeeding prevalence 6–8 weeks. Department of Health, Jan 2015.Google Scholar

Dodwell, M, Newburn, M. Normal birth as a measure of the quality of care. In Evidence on safety, effectiveness and women’s experiences. London: National Childbirth Trust, 2010.Google Scholar

Berg, M, Dahlberg, K. Swedish midwives’ care of women who are at high obstetric risk or who have obstetric complications. Midwifery 2001;17:259–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed