Bonner, FJ, DevlescHoward, AB. AAEM minimonograph #45: the early development of electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:825–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchthal, F, Rosenfalck, A. Evoked action potentials and conduction velocity in human sensory nerves. Brain Res 1966;3:1–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, GD. A summation technique for the detection of sensory and motor nerve fibres in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1956;131:436–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, GD, Scott, JW. The recording of nerve action potentials through sin in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1949;12:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einthoven, W. Ein neues galvanometer. Drudes Ann Physik, 1901.Google Scholar

Falck, B, Stalberg, E. Motor nerve conduction studies: measurement principles and interpretation of findings. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:254–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilliatt, RW, Sears, TA. Sensory nerve action potentials in patients with peripheral nerve lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1958;21:109–118.Google Scholar

Hodes, R, Larrabee, MG, German, W. The human electromyogram in response to nerve stimulation and the conduction velocity of motor axons. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1948; 60:340–365.Google Scholar

Kimura, J. Electrodiagnosis in disease of nerve and muscle: principles and practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Lagerlund, TD. Volume conduction. In Daube, JR, editor, Clinical neurophysiology. Philadelphia, FA Davis Company, 1996:29–39.Google Scholar

Netherton, BL. Electrodiagnostic instrumentation: understand and manage it. In Neurophysiology and Instrumentation Course. 57th Annual Meeting of the AANEM, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 2010:21–28.Google Scholar

Piper, H. Elektrophysiologie menschlicher Muskeln. Berlin, Verlag Julius Springer, 1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sears, TA. Action potentials evoked in digital nerves by stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the human finger. J Physiol (Lond) 1959;148:30–31.Google Scholar

Wilbourn, AJ. How can electromyography help you? Postgrad Med 1983;73:187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilbourn, AJ. Sensory nerve conduction studies. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:584–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilbourn, AJ, Ferrante, MA. Clinical electromyography. In Joynt, RJ, Griggs, RC, editors, Clinical neurology, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1–76.Google Scholar

Bonner, FJ, DevlescHoward, AB. AAEM minimonograph #45: the early development of electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:825–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, GD. The relative excitability and conduction velocity of sensory and motor nerve fibers in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1956;131:436–451.Google Scholar

Dumitru, D. Electrodiagnostic medicine. Philadelphia, Hanley and Belphus, 1994.Google Scholar

Falck, B, Stalberg, E. Motor nerve conduction studies: measurement principles and interpretation of findings. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:254–279.Google Scholar

Hakansson, CH. Conduction velocities and amplitude of the action potential as related to circumference in the isolated frog muscle fiber. Acta Physiol Scand 1956;37:14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodes, R, Larrabee, MG, German, W. The human electromyogram in response to nerve stimulation and the conduction velocity of motor axons. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1948; 60:340–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horning, MR, Kraft, GH, Guy, A. Latencies recorded by intramuscular needle electrodes in different portions of a muscle: variation and comparison with surface electrodes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972;53:206–210.Google ScholarPubMed

Isley, MR, Krauss, GL, Levin, KH, Litt, B, Shields, RW Jr, Wilbourn, AJ. Electromyography and electroencephalography. Biophysical Measurement Series. Redmond, SpaceLabs Medical, Inc, 1993.Google Scholar

Kimura, J, Machida, M, Ishida, T, Yamada, T, Rodnitzky, RL, Kudo, Y, Suzuki, S. Relationship between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials and length of nerve segment. Neurology 1986;36:647–652.Google Scholar

Kincaid, JC, Brasher, A, Markand, ON. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:392–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krarup, C, Horowitz, SH, Dahl, K. The influence of the stimulus on normal sural nerve conduction velocity: a study of the latency of activation. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:813–821.Google Scholar

Lambert, EH. Electromyography and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves and muscles. In Mayo Clinic staff, editors, Clinical examinations in neurology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1956:287–317.Google Scholar

Lee, RG, Ashby, P, White, DG, Aguayo, AJ. Analysis of motor conduction velocity in human median nerve by computer simulation of compound muscle action potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophys 1975;39:225–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rhee, EK, England, JD, Sumner, AJ. A computer simulation of conduction block: effects produced by actual block versus interphase cancellation. Ann Neurol 1990;28:146–156.Google Scholar

Simpson, JA. Electrical signs in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and related syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1956;19:275–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Asseldonk, JTH, Van den Berg, LH, Wieneke, GH, Wokke, JHJ, Franssen, H. Criteria for conduction block base on computer simulation studies of nerve conduction with human data obtained in the forearm segment of the median nerve. Brain 2006;129:2447–2460.Google Scholar

Wilbourn, AJ. How can electromyography help you? Postgrad Med 1983;73:187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilbourn, AJ. Sensory nerve conduction studies. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:584–601.Google Scholar

Bolton, CF, Carter, K. Human sensory nerve compound action potential amplitude. Variation with sex and finger circumference. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980;43:925–928.Google Scholar

Buller, AJ, Styles, PR. A new averaging technique for improving the signal-to-noise ratio of evoked potentials. J Physiol (Lond) 1959;149:65P.Google Scholar

Campbell, WW, Ward, LC, Swift, TR. Nerve conduction velocity varies inversely with height. Muscle Nerve 1981;4:520–523.Google Scholar

Chodoroff, G, Tashjian, EA, Ellenberg, MR. Orthodromic versus antidromic sensory nerve latencies in healthy persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66:589–591.Google Scholar

Cohn, TG, Wertsch, JJ, Pasupuleti, DV, Loftsgaarden, BS, Schenk, VA. Nerve conduction studies: orthodromic versus antidromic latencies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:579–582.Google Scholar

Dorfman, LJ. The distribution of conduction velocities (DCV) in peripheral nerves: a review. Muscle Nerve 1984;7:2–11.Google Scholar

Dorfman, LJ, Cummins, KL, Abraham, GS. Conduction velocity distributions of the human median nerve: comparison of methods. Muscle Nerve 1982;5:S148–S153.Google Scholar

Dumitru, D. Electrodiagnostic medicine. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 1995.Google Scholar

Eduardo, E, Burke, D. The optimal recording electrode configuration for compound sensory action potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:684–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilliatt, RW, Melville, ID, Velate, AS, Eillison, RG. A study of normal nerve action potentials using an averaging technique (barrier gri storage tube). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1965;28:191–200.Google Scholar

Gilliatt, RW, Thomas, PK. Changes in nerve conduction with ulnar lesions at the elbow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23:312–320.Google Scholar

Kimura, J, Machida, M, Ishida, T, Yamada, T, Rodnitzky, RL, Kudo, Y, Suzuki, S. Relationship between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials and length of nerve segment. Neurology 1986;36:647–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murai, Y, Sanderson, I. Studies of sensory conduction. Comparison of latencies of orthodromic and antidromic sensory potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1975;38:1187–1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nandedkar, S. Motor and sensory nerve conduction: technique, measurements, and anatomic correlation. In Neurophysiology and Instrumentation, 57th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 2010:1–8.Google Scholar

Pitman, JR. A digital delay and time-scale generator. J Physiol (Lond) 1958;148:30–31P.Google Scholar

Raynor, EM, Preston, DC, Logigian, EL. Influence of surface recording electrode placement on nerve action potentials. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:361–363.Google Scholar

Tavee, JO, Polston, D, Zhou, L, Shields, RW, Butler, RS, Levin, KH. Sural sensory nerve action potential, epidermal nerve fiber density, and quantitative sudomotor axon reflex in the healthy elderly. Muscle Nerve 2014;49:564–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilbourn, AJ. Sensory nerve conduction studies. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:584–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilbourn, AJ, Ferrante, MA. Clinical electromyography. In Joynt, RJ, Griggs, RC, editors, Clinical neurology, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1–76.Google Scholar

Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology AIDS Task Force. Research criteria for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurology 1991;41:617–618.Google Scholar

Bostok, H, Sears, TA. The internodal axon membrane excitability and continuous conduction in segmental demyelination. J Physiol 1978;274:385–387.Google Scholar

Campbell, WW. Essentials of electrodiagnostic medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1999.Google Scholar

Cornblath, DR, Sumner, AJ, Daube, J, Gilliatt, RW, Brown, WF, Parry, GJ, Albers, JW, Miller, RG, Petajan, J. Conduction block in clinical practice. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:869–871.Google Scholar

Gilliatt, RW, Hjorth, R. Nerve conduction during Wallerian degeneration in the baboon. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1972;35:335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodes, R, Larrabee, MG, German, W. The human electromyogram in response to nerve stimulation and the conduction velocity of motor axons. Arch Neurology Psychiatry 1948;60:340–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lambert, EH, Mulder, DW. Electromyographic studies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc 1957:441–446.Google Scholar

Rhee, EK, England, JD, Sumner, AJ. A computer simulation of conduction block: effects produced by actual block versus interphase cancellation. Ann Neurol 1990;28:146–156.Google Scholar

Rotshenker, S. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. In Tubbs, RS, Rizk, E, Shoja, MM, Loukas, M, Barbaro, N, Spinner, RJ, editors, Nerves and nerve injuries. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015:611–628.Google Scholar

Uncini, A, DiMuzio, M, Sabeatelli, M, Magi, S, Tonali, P, Gambi, D. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic criteria for conduction block in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;89:161–169.Google Scholar

Waller, A. Experiments on the section of the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves of the frog, observations of the alterations produced thereby in the structure of their primitive fibers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1850;140:423–429.Google Scholar

Wilbourn, AJ. How can electromyography help you? Postgrad Med 1983;73:187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilbourn, AJ. Common peroneal neuropathy at the fibular head. Muscle Nerve 1986;9:825–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrante, MA. Brachial plexopathies. Continuum 2014;20:1323–1342.Google ScholarPubMed

Ferrante, MA, Wilbourn, AJ. The utility of various sensory nerve conduction responses in assessing brachial plexopathies. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:1–11.Google Scholar

Ackil, AA, Shahani, BT, Young, RR, Rubin, NE. Late responses and sural conduction studies. Usefulness in patients with chronic renal failure. Arch Neurol 1981;38:482–485.Google Scholar

Aiello, I, Rosati, G, Serra, G, Manca, M. The diagnostic value of H-index in S1 root compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:171–172.Google Scholar

Bischoff, C, Stalberg, E, Falck, B, Puksa, L. Significance of A-waves recorded in routine motor nerve conduction studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;101:528–533.Google Scholar

Braddom, RI, Johnson, EW. Standardization of H reflex and diagnostic use in S1 radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1974;55:161–166.Google Scholar

D’Amour, ML, Shahani, BT, Young, RR, Bird, KT. The importance of studying sural nerve conduction and late response in the evaluation of alcoholic subjects. Neurology 1979;29:1600–1604.Google Scholar

Delwaide, PJ. Contribution of human reflex studies to the understanding of the pyramidal syndrome. In Shahani, BT, editor, Electromyography in CNS disorders: central EMG. Boston: Butterworths, 1984:77–109.Google Scholar

Deschuytere, J, Roselle, N, De Keyser, C. Monosynaptic reflexes in superficial forearm flexors in man and their clinical significance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1976;39:555–565.Google Scholar

Dumitru, D. Electrodiagnostic medicine. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 1995.Google Scholar

Eccles, JC. The central action of antidromic impulses in motor nerve fibres. Pflugers Arch 1955;260:385–415.Google Scholar

Falck, B, Stalberg, E. Motor nerve conduction studies: measurement principles and interpretation of findings. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:254–279.Google Scholar

Falco, FJ, Hennessye, WJ, Goldberg, G, Braddom, RL. H reflex latency in the healthy elderly. Muscle Nerve 1994;17:1350–1351.Google Scholar

Fisher, MA. AAEM minimonograph #13: H reflexes and F waves: physiology and clinical applications. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:1223–1233.Google Scholar

Fullerton, PM, Gilliatt, RW. Axon reflexes in human motor nerves. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1965;28:1–11.Google Scholar

Granit, R, Leksell, L, Skoglund, CR. Fibre interaction in injured or compressed region of nerve. Brain 1944;67;125–140.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. Uber die beziehungen der schenreflexe zur willkurlichen bewegen zum tonus. Z Biol 1918;68:351–370.Google Scholar

Jankus, WR, Robinson, LR, Little, JW. Normal limits of side-to-side H-reflex amplitude variability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katirji, MB, Weissman, JD. The tibial H reflex and the ankle jerk. Muscle Nerve 1988;11:971–972 (Abstract).Google Scholar

Kimura, J. F-wave velocity in the central segment of the median and ulnar nerves. A study in normal patients and in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurology 1974;24:539–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Magistratis, MR, Roth, G. Long-lasting conduction block in hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Neurology 1985;35:1639–1641.Google Scholar

Magladery, JW, McDougal, DB. Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex in normal man. I. Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1950;86:265–290.Google Scholar

Marra, TR. F wave measurements: a comparison of various recording techniques in health and peripheral nerve disease. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;27:33–37.Google Scholar

Olsen, PZ, Diamantopoulos, F. Excitability of spinal motor neurons in normal subjects and patients with spasticity, Parkinsonia rigidity, and cerebellar hypotonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1967;30:325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panayatopoulos, CP. F chronodispersion: a new electrophysiological method. Muscle Nerve 1979;2:69–72.Google Scholar

Panizza, M, Nilsson, J, Hallett, M. Optimal stimulus for the H reflex. Muscle Nerve 1989;12:576–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Petajan, JH. F-waves in neurogenic atrophy. Muscle Nerve 1985;8:690–696.Google Scholar

Roth, G. Intranervous regeneration of lower motor neuron – I. Study of 1153 nerves. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;18(3):225–288.Google Scholar

Roth, G. Intranervous regeneration of lower motor neuron – II. Study of 1153 nerves. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;18(5):311–351.Google Scholar

Thomas, JE, Lambert, EH. Ulnar nerve conduction velocity and H-reflex in infants and children. J Appl Physiol 1980;15:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, W, Litchy, WJ, Mandrekar, J, Dyck, PJ, Klein, CJ. Blink reflex role in algorithmic genetic testing of inherited polyneuropathies. Muscle Nerve 2017;55:316–322.Google Scholar

Weintraub, JR, Madalin, K, Wong, M, Wilbourn, AJ, Mahdad, M. Achilles tendon reflex and the H response. Muscle Nerve 1988;11:972 (Abstract).Google Scholar

Wilbourn, AJ, Ferrante, MA. Clinical electromyography. In Joynt, RJ, Griggs, RC, editors, Clinical neurology, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1–76.Google Scholar

Yates, SK, Brown, WF. Characteristics of the F response: a single motor unit study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979;42:161–170.Google Scholar

Abraham, A, Alabdali, M, Alsulaiman, A, Breiner, A, Barnett, C, Katzberg, HD, Lovblom, LE, Bril, V. Repetitive nerve stimulation cutoff values for the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2017;55:166–170.Google Scholar

Harvey, AM, Maslund, RL. Method of study for neuromuscular transmission in human subjects. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1941;68:81–93.Google Scholar

Kadrie, HA, Brown, WF. Neuromuscular transmission in human single motor units. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:193–204.Google Scholar

Keesey, JC. AAEE minimonograph #33: electrodiagnostic approach to defects of neuromuscular transmission. Muscle Nerve 1989;12:613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennon, VA, Kryzer, TJ, Griesmann, GE, O’Suilleabhain, PE, Windebank, AJ, Woppmann, A, Miljanich, GP, Lambert, EH. Calcium-channel antibodies in the Lambert-Eaton syndrome and other paraneoplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1467–1474.Google Scholar

Levin, KH. Disorders of neuromuscular junction transmission. In Levin, KH, Luders, HO, editors, Comprehensive clinical neurophysiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 2000:251–267.Google Scholar

Lindstrom, JM, Lambert, EH. Content of acetylcholine receptor and antibodies bound to receptor in myasthenia gravis, experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis, and Eaton-Lambert syndrome. Neurology 1978;28:130–138.Google Scholar

Rhaminimoff, R, Erulkar, SD, Lev-Tov, A. intracellular and extracellular calcium ions in transmitter release at the neuromuscular synapse. Ann NY Acad Sci 1978;307:583–598.Google Scholar

Sanders, DB, Stalberg, E. The overlap between myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Ann NY Acad Sci 1987;505:864–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stalberg, E. Electrogenesis in dystrophic human muscle. In Rowland, LP, editor, Pathogenesis of human muscular dystrophies. Proceedings of the Fifth International Scientific Conference of the Muscular Dystrophy Association, Durango, Colorado. Amsterdam, Oxford: Exerpta Medica, 1976:570–589.Google Scholar

Streib, EW. AAEE minimonograph #27: differential diagnosis of myotonic syndromes. Muscle Nerve 1987;10:603–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar