Book contents
- Genes, Determinism and God
- Genes, Determinism and God
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Human Personhood Fragmented?
- Chapter 2 Reifying the Fragments?
- Chapter 3 The Impact of the New Genetics?
- Chapter 4 Reshaping the Matrix?
- Chapter 5 Is the Worm Determined?
- Chapter 6 Prisoners of the Genes?
- Chapter 7 Behavioural Molecules?
- Chapter 8 Mensa, Mediocrity or Meritocracy?
- Chapter 9 Gay Genes?
- Chapter 10 Not My Fault?
- Chapter 11 Causality, Emergence and Freedom?
- Chapter 12 Made in the Image of God?
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2017
Book contents
- Genes, Determinism and God
- Genes, Determinism and God
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Human Personhood Fragmented?
- Chapter 2 Reifying the Fragments?
- Chapter 3 The Impact of the New Genetics?
- Chapter 4 Reshaping the Matrix?
- Chapter 5 Is the Worm Determined?
- Chapter 6 Prisoners of the Genes?
- Chapter 7 Behavioural Molecules?
- Chapter 8 Mensa, Mediocrity or Meritocracy?
- Chapter 9 Gay Genes?
- Chapter 10 Not My Fault?
- Chapter 11 Causality, Emergence and Freedom?
- Chapter 12 Made in the Image of God?
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genes, Determinism and God , pp. 311 - 356Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adhikari, A. 2015. Basomedial Amygdala Mediates Top-Down Control of Anxiety and Fear. Nature, 527: 179–85.Google Scholar
Alanko, K., Santtila, P., Harlaar, N., et al. 2010. Common Genetic Effects of Gender Atypical Behavior in Childhood and Sexual Orientation in Adulthood: A Study of Finnish Twins. Arch Sex Behav, 39: 81–92.Google Scholar
Alati, R., Davey Smith, G., Lewis, S. J., et al. 2013. Effect of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Childhood Academic Outcomes: Contrasting Maternal and Paternal Associations in the ALSPAC Study. PLoS One, 8: e74844.Google Scholar
Alexander, D. R. 2011. The Language of Genetics – an Introduction.Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, P., Schlegel, A., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., et al. 2015. Dissecting the Readiness Potential: An Investigation of the Relationship between Readiness Potentials, Conscious Willing and Action. In: Mele, A. R. (ed.) Surrounding Free Will. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L. & Hibbing, J. R. 2005. Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted? Am Polit Sci Rev, 99: 153–67.Google Scholar
Algaze, G. 2008. Ancient Mesopotamia at the Dawn of Civilization: The Evolution of an Urban Landscape. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Allen, L. S. & Gorski, R. A. 1992. Sexual Orientation and the Size of the Anterior Commissure in the Human Brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89: 7199–202.Google Scholar
Alquist, J. L., Ainsworth, S. E. & Baumeister, R. F. 2013. Determined to Conform: Disbelief in Free Will Increases Conformity. J Exp Soc Psychol, 49: 80–6.Google Scholar
Amundsen, D. W. 1987. Medicine and the Birth of Defective Children, Approaches of the Ancient World. In: Mcmillan, R. C., Engelhardt, H. T. & Spicker, S. F. (eds.) Euthanasia and the Newborn. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. C., Bloom, J. S., Gerke, J. P., et al. 2014. A Variant in the Neuropeptide Receptor NPR-1 Is a Major Determinant of Caenorhabditis Elegans Growth and Physiology. PLoS Genet, 10: e1004156.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. P. & Blosnich, J. 2013. Disparities in Adverse Childhood Experiences among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adults: Results from a Multi-State Probability-Based Sample. Plos One, 8: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054691.Google Scholar
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L. & Tan, M. 2011. Cultural Intelligence. In: Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S. 2014. The Double Helix Takes the Witness Stand: Behavioral and Neuropsychiatric Genetics in Court. Neuron, 82: 946–9.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S. & Scurich, N. 2014. Impact of Behavioral Genetic Evidence on the Adjudication of Criminal Behavior. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 42: 91–100.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M. & Maes, H. H. 2012. The Genetic Basis of Political Sophistication. Twin Res Hum Genet, 15: 34–41.Google Scholar
Aslund, C., Nordquist, N., Comasco, E., et al. 2011. Maltreatment, MAOA, and Delinquency: Sex Differences in Gene-Environment Interaction in a Large Population-Based Cohort of Adolescents. Behav Genet, 41: 262–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinwall, L. G., Brown, T. R. & Tabery, J. 2012. The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges’ Sentencing of Psychopaths? Science, 337: 846–9.Google Scholar
Atiq, E. H. 2012. How Folk Beliefs about Free Will Influence Sentencing: A New Target for the Neuro-Determinist Critics of Criminal Law. New Crim Law Rev, 16: 449–93.Google Scholar
Attfield, R. 1991. The Ethics of Environmental Concern.Athens: University of Georgia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, S. B. O. H. & Dods, M. 2009. The City of God. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.Google Scholar
Baigent, M. & Baigent, M. 2015. Astrology in Ancient Mesopotamia: The Science of Omens and the Knowledge of the Heavens.Rochester: Vermont Bear & Company.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. M. & Pillard, R. C. 1991. A Genetic Study of Male Sexual Orientation. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 48: 1089–96.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. M., Pillard, R. C., Neale, M. C., et al. 1993. Heritable Factors Influence Sexual Orientation in Women. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 50: 217–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baillie, J. K., Barnett, M. W., Upton, K. R., et al. 2011. Somatic Retrotransposition Alters the Genetic Landscape of the Human Brain. Nature, 479: 534–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. R. 1995. Need a Christian Be a Mind-Body Dualist? Faith and Philos, 12: 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & Van Ijzendoorn, M. H. 2011. Differential Susceptibility to Rearing Environment Depending on Dopamine-Related Genes: New Evidence and a Meta-Analysis. Dev Psychopathol, 23: 39–52.Google Scholar
Balsam, K. F., Rothblum, E. D. & Beauchaine, T. P. 2005. Victimization over the Life Span: A Comparison of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Siblings. J Consult Clin Psychol, 73: 477–87.Google Scholar
Balter, M. 2015. Behavioral Genetics. Can Epigenetics Explain Homosexuality Puzzle? Science, 350: 148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banasr, M. & Duman, R. S. 2012. Adult Neurogenesis: Nature Versus Nurture. Biol Psychiatry, 72: 256–7.Google Scholar
Banner, M. C. 2014. The Ethics of Everyday Life: Moral Theology, Social Anthropology, and the Imagination of the Human: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barash, Y., Calarco, J. A., Gao, W., et al. 2010. Deciphering the Splicing Code. Nature, 465: 53–9.Google Scholar
Bargmann, C. I. 2006. Chemosensation in C Elegans. Wormbook: Doi/10.1895/Wormbook.1.123.1.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 2005. Testing the Extreme Male Brain (EMB) Theory of Autism: Let the Data Speak for Themselves. Cogn Neuropsychiatry, 10: 77–81.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 2010. Empathizing, Systemizing, and the Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism. Prog Brain Res, 186: 167–75.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Burtenshaw, A., et al. 2007. Mathematical Talent Is Linked to Autism. Human Nature, 18: 125–131.Google Scholar
Barres, R., Yan, J., Egan, B., et al. 2012. Acute Exercise Remodels Promoter Methylation in Human Skeletal Muscle. Cell Metab, 15: 405–11.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. E., Keebaugh, A. C., Ahern, T. H., et al. 2013. Variation in Vasopressin Receptor (Avpr1a) Expression Creates Diversity in Behaviors Related to Monogamy in Prairie Voles. Horm. Behav., 63: 518–526.Google Scholar
Barriere, A. & Felix, M. 2005a. Natural Variation and Population Genetics of Caenorhabditis Elegans. Wormbook: Doi/10.1895/Wormbook.1.43.1.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 2005b. High Local Genetic Diversity and Low Outcrossing Rate in Caenorhabditis Elegans Natural Populations. Curr Biol, 15: 1176–1184.Google Scholar
Barth, K., Bromiley, G. W. & Torrance, T. F. 1975. Church Dogmatics,Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Bates, B. R. 2005. Public Culture and Public Understanding of Genetics: A Focus Group Study. Public Underst. Sci., 14: 47–65.Google Scholar
Bateson, P. P. G. & Gluckman, P. D. 2011. Plasticity, Robustness, Development and Evolution: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauckham, R. 2011. Living with Other Creatures: Green Exegesis and Theology, Waco, Tex.: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, M. L. 2013. The Monoamine Oxidase A (MAOA) Genetic Predisposition to Impulsive Violence: Is It Relevant to Criminal Trials? Neuroethics, 6: 287–306.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. & Brewer, L. E. 2012. Believing Versus Disbelieving in Free Will: Correlates and Consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6: 736–745.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Clark, C. & Luguri, J. 2015. Free Will – Belief and Reality. In: Mele, A. R. (ed.) Surrounding Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J. & Dewall, C. N. 2009. Prosocial Benefits of Feeling Free: Disbelief in Free Will Increases Aggression and Reduces Helpfulness. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 35: 260–268.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Mele, A. R. & Vohs, K. D. 2010. Free Will and Consciousness: How Might They Work?: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. 1993. The Average Expectable Environment Is Not Good Enough: A Response to Scarr. Child Dev, 64: 1299–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazak, L., Haviv, A., Barak, M., et al. 2014. A-to-I RNA Editing Occurs at over a Hundred Million Genomic Sites, Located in a Majority of Human Genes. Genome Res, 24: 365–76.Google Scholar
Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., Boutwell, B. B., et al. 2013. Exploring the Association between the 2-Repeat Allele of the MAOA Gene Promoter Polymorphism and Psychopathic Personality Traits, Arrests, Incarceration, and Lifetime Antisocial Behavior. Pers. Individ. Differ., 54: 164–168.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. & Richardson, R. C. 1993. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research,Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beckwith, J. & Morris, C. A. 2008. Twin Studies of Political Behavior: Untenable Assumptions? Perspect. Polit., 6: 785–791.Google Scholar
Bedau, M. & Humphreys, P. 2008. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science,Cambridge, Mass.; London: MIT.Google Scholar
Bedau, M. A. 2010. Weak Emergence and Context-Sensitive Reduction. In: Corradini, A. & O’Connor, T. (eds.) Emergence in Science and Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bedny, M., Konkle, T., Pelphrey, K., et al. 2010. Sensitive Period for a Multimodal Response in Human Visual Motion Area MT/MST. Curr Biol, 20: 1900–6.Google Scholar
Bedny, M., Pascual-Leone, A., Dravida, S., et al. 2011. A Sensitive Period for Language in the Visual Cortex: Distinct Patterns of Plasticity in Congenitally Versus Late Blind Adults. Brain Lang, 122: 162–70.Google Scholar
Bedny, M. & Saxe, R. 2012. Insights into the Origins of Knowledge from the Cognitive Neuroscience of Blindness. Cogn Neuropsychol, 29: 56–84.Google Scholar
Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. & Menzies, P. C. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Causation: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beiber, I., Dain, H. J., Dince, P. R., et al. 1962. Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bejerot, S., Eriksson, J. M., Bonde, S., et al. 2012. The Extreme Male Brain Revisited: Gender Coherence in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Br J Psychiatry, 201: 116–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belay, A. T., Scheiner, R., So, A. K. C., et al. 2007. The Foraging Gene of Drosophila Melanogaster: Spatial-Expression Analysis and Sucrose Responsiveness. J. Comp. Neurol., 504: 570–582.Google Scholar
Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S. & Hammersmith, S. K. 1981. Sexual Preference, Its Development in Men and Women: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, J. T. & Spector, T. D. 2012. DNA Methylation Studies Using Twins: What Are They Telling Us? Genome Biol, 13: 172.Google Scholar
Bell, J. T., Tsai, P. C., Yang, T. P., et al. 2012. Epigenome-Wide Scans Identify Differentially Methylated Regions for Age and Age-Related Phenotypes in a Healthy Ageing Population. PLoS Genet, 8: e1002629.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. 1997. Variation in Susceptibility to Environmental Influence: An Evolutionary Argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8: 182–186.Google Scholar
Benjamin, D. J., Cesarini, D., Van Der Loos, M. J., et al. 2012. The Genetic Architecture of Economic and Political Preferences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109: 8026–31.Google Scholar
Benyamin, B., Pourcain, B., Davis, O. S., et al. 2014. Childhood Intelligence Is Heritable, Highly Polygenic and Associated with FNBP1L. Mol Psychiatry, 19: 253–8.Google Scholar
Berenbaum, S. A. & Beltz, A. M. 2011. Sexual Differentiation of Human Behavior: Effects of Prenatal and Pubertal Organizational Hormones. Front. Neuroendocrinol., 32: 183–200.Google Scholar
Bernet, W., Vnencak-Jones, C. L., Farahany, N., et al. 2007. Bad Nature, Bad Nurture, and Testimony Regarding MAOA and SLC6A4 Genotyping at Murder Trials. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52: 1362–1371.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. E., Birney, E., Dunham, I., et al. 2012. An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome. Nature, 489: 57–74.Google Scholar
Berntson, G. G., Sarter, M. & Cacioppo, J. T. 2003. Ascending Visceral Regulation of Cortical Affective Information Processing. Eur J Neurosci, 18: 2103–9.Google Scholar
Biehn, K. J. 2009. “Monkeys, Babies, Idiots” and “Primitives”: Nature-Nurture Debates and Philanthropic Foundation Support for American Anthropology in the 1920s and 1930s. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 45: 219–235.Google Scholar
Billig, J. P., Hershberger, S. L., Iacono, W. G., et al. 1996. Life Events and Personality in Late Adolescence: Genetic and Environmental Relations. Behav Genet, 26: 543–54.Google Scholar
Bizer, G. Y., Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., et al. 2004. The Impact of Personality on Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Political Processes: The Effects of Need to Evaluate. J Pers, 72: 995–1027.Google Scholar
Boas, F. & Stocking, G. W. 1974. A Franz Boas Reader: The Shaping of American Anthropology, 1883–1911: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bobadilla, J. L., Macek, M., Jr., Fine, J. P., et al. 2002. Cystic Fibrosis: A Worldwide Analysis of CFTR Mutations–Correlation with Incidence Data and Application to Screening. Hum Mutat, 19: 575–606.Google Scholar
Boender, A. J., Roubos, E. W. & Van Der Velde, G. 2011. Together or Alone? Foraging Strategies in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Biol. Rev., 86: 853–862.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F. 2006. Biological Versus Nonbiological Older Brothers and Men’s Sexual Orientation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103: 10771–10774.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F. & Skorska, M. 2011. Sexual Orientation, Fraternal Birth Order, and the Maternal Immune Hypothesis: A Review. Front. Neuroendocrinol., 32: 247–254.Google Scholar
Bond, J., Roberts, E., Mochida, G. H., et al. 2002. ASPM Is a Major Determinant of Cerebral Cortical Size. Nat Genet, 32: 316–20.Google Scholar
Boomsma, D. I., De Geus, E. J., Van Baal, G. C., et al. 1999. A Religious Upbringing Reduces the Influence of Genetic Factors on Disinhibition: Evidence for Interaction between Genotype and Environment on Personality. Twin research, 2: 115–25.Google Scholar
Bouchard, T. J. 2004. Genetic Influence on Human Psychological Traits – a Survey. Curr. Dir. Psychol., 13: 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. 2014. Genes, Evolution and Intelligence. Behav Genet, 44: 549–77.Google Scholar
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., et al. 1990. Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science, 250: 223–8.Google Scholar
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., McGue, M., Lykken, D., et al. 1999. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religiousness: Genetic and Environmental Influences and Personality Correlates. Twin Research, 2: 88–98.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, M. & Ellison, C. G. 2008. Do Genetic Factors Influence Religious Life? Findings from a Behavior Genetic Analysis of Twin Siblings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47: 529–544.Google Scholar
Brady, P., Brison, N., Van Den Bogaert, K., et al. 2015. Clinical Implementation of NIPT – Technical and Biological Challenges. Clin Genet, 10.1111/cge.12598.Google Scholar
Brakefield, T., Mednick, S., Wilson, H., et al. 2014. Same-Sex Sexual Attraction Does Not Spread in Adolescent Social Networks. Arch. Sex. Behav., 43: 335–344.Google Scholar
Brewer, K. 2006. The Nature-Nurture Debate on Human Sexual Orientation,Grays: Orsett Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Brooks-Crozier, J. 2011. The Nature and Nurture of Violence: Early Intervention Services for the Families of Maoa-Low Children as a Means to Reduce Violent Crime and the Costs of Violent Crime. Connecticut Law Review, 44: 531–573.Google Scholar
Brown, A. S. 2006. Prenatal Infection as a Risk Factor for Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull, 32: 200–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, N. J., Macdonald, D. A., Samanta, M. P., et al. 2014. A Critical Reanalysis of the Relationship between Genomics and Well-Being. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111: 12705–9.Google Scholar
Brown, W. S., Murphy, N. C. & Malony, H. N. 1998. Whatever Happened to the Soul?: Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature,Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. S. & Paul, L. K. 2015. Brain Connectivity and the Emergence of Capacities of Personhood: Reflections from Callosal Agenesis and Autism. In: Jeeves, M. (ed.) The Emergence of Personhood – a Quantum Leap? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Brown, W. S. & Strawn, B. D. 2012. The Physical Nature of Christian Life: Neuroscience, Psychology, and the Church: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunner, H., Nelen, M., Breakefield, X., et al. 1993a. Abnormal Behavior Associated with a Point Mutation in the Structural Gene for Monoamine Oxidase A. Science, 262: 578–580.Google Scholar
Brunner, H. G., Nelen, M. R., Vanzandvoort, P., et al. 1993b. X-Linked Borderline Mental Retardation with Prominent Behavioral Disturbance – Phenotype, Genetic Localization, and Evidence for Disturbed Monoamine Metabolism. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 52: 1032–1039.Google Scholar
Bubela, T. M. & Caulfield, T. A. 2004. Do the Print Media “Hype” Genetic Research? A Comparison of Newspaper Stories and Peer-Reviewed Research Papers. CMAJ, 170: 1399–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckholtz, J. W. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. 2008. MAOA and the Neurogenetic Architecture of Human Aggression. Trends Neurosci., 31: 120–129.Google Scholar
Bundo, M., Toyoshima, M., Okada, Y., et al. 2014. Increased L1 Retrotransposition in the Neuronal Genome in Schizophrenia. Neuron, 81: 306–13.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, R. W. 1999. Ethology, Natural History, the Life Sciences, and the Problem of Place. J. Hist. Biol., 32: 489–508.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, R. W. 2015. That Lamarckian Evolution Relied Largely on Use and Disuse and That Darwin Rejected Lamarckian Mechanisms In: Numbers, R. L. & Kampourakis, K. (eds.) Newton’s Apple and Other Myths About Science. Cambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burne, T., Scott, E., Van Swinderen, B., et al. 2011. Big Ideas for Small Brains: What Can Psychiatry Learn from Worms, Flies, Bees and Fish? Mol. Psychiatr., 16: 7–16.Google Scholar
Burri, A., Cherkas, L., Spector, T., et al. 2011. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Female Sexual Orientation, Childhood Gender Typicality and Adult Gender Identity. Plos One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021982.Google Scholar
Burt, A. 2011. Some Key Issues in the Study of Gene-Environment Interplay: Activation, Deactivation, and the Role of Development. Research in Human Development, 8: 192–210.Google Scholar
Buss, C., Davis, E. P., Shahbaba, B., et al. 2012. Maternal Cortisol over the Course of Pregnancy and Subsequent Child Amygdala and Hippocampus Volumes and Affective Problems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109: E1312-E1319.Google Scholar
Button, T. M. M., Stallings, M. C., Rhee, S. H., et al. 2011. The Etiology of Stability and Change in Religious Values and Religious Attendance. Behav. Genet., 41: 201–210.Google Scholar
Bygren, L. O., Tinghog, P., Carstensen, J., et al. 2014. Change in Paternal Grandmothers’ Early Food Supply Influenced Cardiovascular Mortality of the Female Grandchildren. BMC Genet, 15: 12–18.Google Scholar
Byne, W., Tobet, S., Mattiace, L. A., et al. 2001. The Interstitial Nuclei of the Human Anterior Hypothalamus: An Investigation of Variation with Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Hiv Status. Horm. Behav., 40: 86–92.Google Scholar
Byrd, A. L. & Manuck, S. B. 2014. MAOA, Childhood Maltreatment, and Antisocial Behavior: Meta-Analysis of a Gene-Environment Interaction. Biol Psychiatry, 75: 9–17.Google Scholar
Callaway, E. 2012. Gene Mutation Defends against Alzheimer’s Disease. Nature, 487: 153.Google Scholar
Callier, P., Calvel, P., Matevossian, A., et al. 2014. Loss of Function Mutation in the Palmitoyl-Transferase HHAT Leads to Syndromic 46,XY Disorder of Sex Development by Impeding Hedgehog Protein Palmitoylation and Signaling. PLoS Genet, 10: e1004340.Google Scholar
Canny, S. P., Goel, G., Reese, T. A., et al. 2013. Latent Gammaherpesvirus 68 Infection Induces Distinct Transcriptional Changes in Different Organs. J Virol, 88: 730–8.Google Scholar
Carey, J. M. & Paulhus, D. L. 2013. Worldview Implications of Believing in Free Will and/or Determinism: Politics, Morality, and Punitiveness. J. Pers., 81: 130–141.Google Scholar
Carlile, T. M., Rojas-Duran, M. F., Zinshteyn, B., et al. 2014. Pseudouridine Profiling Reveals Regulated mRNA Pseudouridylation in Yeast and Human Cells. Nature, 515: 143–6.Google Scholar
Carmichael, L. 1925. Heredity and Environment – Are They Antithetical? J Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 20: 245–260.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1993. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1995. Reflections on Stephen Jay Gould’s the Mismeasure of Man (1981): A Retrospective Review. Intelligence, 21: 121–134.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1997. Psychometrics, Intelligence, and Public Perception. Intelligence, 24: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, J. 2007. The Measure of Merit: Talents, Intelligence, and Inequality in the French and American Republics, 1750–1940: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cases, O., Seif, I., Grimsby, J., et al. 1995. Aggressive Behavior and Altered Amounts of Brain Serotonin and Norepinephrine in Mice Lacking MAOA. Science, 268: 1763–6.Google Scholar
Cashmore, A. R. 2010. The Lucretian Swerve: The Biological Basis of Human Behavior and the Criminal Justice System. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107: 4499–504.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Mcclay, J., Moffitt, T. E., et al. 2002. Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children. Science, 297: 851–854.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Cannon, M., et al. 2005. Moderation of the Effect of Adolescent-Onset Cannabis Use on Adult Psychosis by a Functional Polymorphism in the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Gene: Longitudinal Evidence of a Gene X Environment Interaction. Biol Psychiatry, 57: 1117–27.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., et al. 2003. Influence of Life Stress on Depression: Moderation by a Polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene. Science, 301: 386–389.Google Scholar
Castelli, F. R., Kelley, R. A., Keane, B., et al. 2011. Female Prairie Voles Show Social and Sexual Preferences for Males with Longer Avpr1a Microsatellite Alleles. Animal Behaviour, 82: 1117–1126.Google Scholar
Castera, J., Bruguiere, C. & Clement, P. 2008. Genetic Diseases and Genetic Determinism Models in French Secondary School Biology Textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 42: 53–59.Google Scholar
Castera, J., Sarapuu, T. & Clement, P. 2013. Comparison of French and Estonian Students’ Conceptions in Genetic Determinism of Human Behaviours. Journal of Biological Education, 47: 12–20.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. & Feldman, M. W. 1973. Models for Cultural Inheritance. I. Group Mean and within Group Variation. Theor Popul Biol, 4: 42–55.Google Scholar
Cerasa, A., Cherubini, A., Quattrone, A., et al. 2010. Morphological Correlates of Mao a Vntr Polymorphism: New Evidence from Cortical Thickness Measurement. Behavioural Brain Research, 211: 118–124.Google Scholar
Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., et al. 2008. Heritability of Cooperative Behavior in the Trust Game. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105: 3721–6.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. 2006. Strong and Weak Emergence. In: Clayton, P. & Davies, P. (eds.) The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charney, E. 2012. Behavior Genetics and Postgenomics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35: 331–410.Google Scholar
Charney, E. & English, W. 2012. Candidate Genes and Political Behavior. American Political Science Review, 106: 1–34.Google Scholar
Charollais, J. & Van Der Goot, F. G. 2009. Palmitoylation of Membrane Proteins (Review). Mol Membr Biol, 26: 55–66.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Li, X. Y., Chen, Z. Y., et al. 2010. Optimization of Zygosity Determination by Questionnaire and DNA Genotyping in Chinese Adolescent Twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13: 194–200.Google Scholar
Chester, D. S., Dewall, C. N., Derefinko, K. J., et al. 2015. Monoamine Oxidase A (MAOA) Genotype Predicts Greater Aggression through Impulsive Reactivity to Negative Affect. Behav Brain Res, 283: 97–101.Google Scholar
Cheung, B. H. H., Cohen, M., Rogers, C., et al. 2005. Experience-Dependent C-Elegans Behavior by Modulation of Ambient Oxygen. Curr Biol, 15: 905–917.Google Scholar
Cholfin, J. A. & Rubenstein, J. L. 2007. Patterning of Frontal Cortex Subdivisions by Fgf17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104: 7652–7.Google Scholar
Christian, K. M., Song, H. & Ming, G. L. 2014. Functions and Dysfunctions of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis. Annu Rev Neurosci, 37: 243–62.Google Scholar
Churchill, F. B. 2015. August Weismann: Development, Heredity, and Evolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts Harvard University Press,.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2006. The Big Questions: Do We Have Free Will? New Scientist, 2578: 42–45.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2012. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cirulli, E. T. & Goldstein, D. B. 2007. In Vitro Assays Fail to Predict in Vivo Effects of Regulatory Polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet, 16: 1931–9.Google Scholar
Clarke, G., Grenham, S., Scully, P., et al. 2012. The Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis During Early Life Regulates the Hippocampal Serotonergic System in a Sex-Dependent Manner. Mol Psychiatry, 18: 666–73.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. G. 2014. Neuroscience, Quantum Indeterminism and the Cartesian Soul. Brain Cogn, 84: 109–17.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. G. H. 2010. Determinism, Brain Function and Free Will. Science and Christian Belief, 22: 133–149.Google Scholar
Claxton, G. 2015. Intelligence in the Flesh: Why Your Mind Needs Your Body Much More Than It Thinks: Yale University Presss.Google Scholar
Clayton, P. & Davies, P. 2006. The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, S. W. & Fredrickson, B. L. 2014. Errors in the Brown Et Al. Critical Reanalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111: E3581.Google Scholar
Collins, D. 2002. Nature Versus Nurture: The Long-Standing Debate over What Makes Us the Way We Are,Tiverton: Clayhanger Books.Google Scholar
Colvert, E., Tick, B., Mcewen, F., et al. 2015. Heritability of Autism Spectrum Disorder in a UK Population-Based Twin Sample. JAMA Psychiatry, 72: 415–23.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M. 1999. How the Public Understands Genetics: Non-Deterministic and Non-Discriminatory Interpretations of the “Blueprint” Metaphor. Public Underst. Sci., 8: 169–180.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M. 2010. Public Attitudes and Beliefs About Genetics. In: Chakravarti, A. & Green, E. (eds.) Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Vol 11. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M. 2011. When Do People Deploy Genetic Determinism? A Review Pointing to the Need for Multi-Factorial Theories of Public Utilization of Scientific Discourses. Sociology Compass, 5: 618–635.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M., Gronnvoll, M., Landau, J., et al. 2009. Believing in Both Genetic Determinism and Behavioral Action: A Materialist Framework and Implications. Public Underst. Sci., 18: 730–746.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M., Ofulue, N. & Sheedy, K. M. 1998. Determinism and Mass-Media Portrayals of Genetics. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 62: 979–984.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M. & Shen, L. 2011. Public Understanding of Risks from Gene-Environment Interaction in Common Diseases: Implications for Public Communications. Public Health Genomics, 14: 115–124.Google Scholar
Conley, J. J. 1984. Not Galton, but Shakespeare – a Note on the Origin of the Term Nature and Nurture. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 20: 184–185.Google Scholar
Consortium, . 2004. Finishing the Euchromatic Sequence of the Human Genome. Nature, 431: 931–945.Google Scholar
Consortium, . 2014. Biological Insights from 108 Schizophrenia-Associated Genetic Loci. Nature, 511: 421–427.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings,Chicago: Rand McNally College.Google Scholar
Cooke, K. J. 1998. The Limits of Heredity: Nature and Nurture in American Eugenics before 1915. J. Hist. Biol., 31: 263–278.Google Scholar
Cordaux, R. & Batzer, M. A. 2009. The Impact of Retrotransposons on Human Genome Evolution. Nat Rev Genet, 10: 691–703.Google Scholar
Cordaux, R., Hedges, D. J., Herke, S. W., et al. 2006. Estimating the Retrotransposition Rate of Human Alu Elements. Gene, 373: 134–7.Google Scholar
Corradini, A. & O’Connor, T. 2010. Emergence in Science and Philosophy,London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crane, T. 2001. The Significance of Emergence. In: Loewer, B. & G., G. (eds.) Physicalism and Its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crane, T. 2003. The Mechanical Mind: A Philosophical Introduction to Minds, Machines and Mental Representation,London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cranmer, S. J. & Dawes, C. T. 2012. The Heritability of Foreign Policy Preferences. Twin Res Hum Genet, 15: 52–9.Google Scholar
Crews, D., Gillette, R., Miller-Crews, I., et al. 2014. Nature, Nurture and Epigenetics. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 398: 42–52.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, M. N., Oshlack, A., Theda, C., et al. 2013. Analysis of Epigenetic Changes in Survivors of Preterm Birth Reveals the Effect of Gestational Age and Evidence for a Long Term Legacy. Genome Med, 5: 96.Google Scholar
Crusio, W. E. 2012. Heritability Estimates in Behavior Genetics: Wasn’t That Station Passed Long Ago? Behav Brain Sci, 35: 361–2.Google Scholar
Cubas, P., Vincent, C. & Coen, E. 1999. An Epigenetic Mutation Responsible for Natural Variation in Floral Symmetry. Nature, 401: 157–61.Google Scholar
Curtis, E. M. 1984. Man as the Image of God in Genesis in the Light of Ancient near Eastern Parallels: http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI8422896.Google Scholar
Czyz, W., Morahan, J. M., Ebers, G. C., et al. 2012. Genetic, Environmental and Stochastic Factors in Monozygotic Twin Discordance with a Focus on Epigenetic Differences. BMC Med, 10: 93.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, B. M., Eaves, L. J., Murrelle, L., et al. 1999. Understanding Biological and Social Influences on Religious Affiliation, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Behavior Genetic Perspective. J. Pers., 67: 953–984.Google Scholar
Dambrun, M., Kamiejski, R., Haddadi, N., et al. 2009. Why Does Social Dominance Orientation Decrease with University Exposure to the Social Sciences? The Impact of Institutional Socialization and the Mediating Role of “Geneticism”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 88–100.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1868. Variation of Plants and Animals under Domestication, Vol. 2, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Daston, L. & Park, K. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750,New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. E. & Kemp, I. A. 2011. Contemporary Models of Intelligence. In: Sternberg, R. & Kaufman, S. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, G., Tenesa, A., Payton, A., et al. 2011. Genome-Wide Association Studies Establish That Human Intelligence Is Highly Heritable and Polygenic. Mol. Psychiatr., 16: 996–1005.Google Scholar
Dawood, K., Pillard, R. C., Horvath, C., et al. 2000. Familial Aspects of Male Homosexuality. Arch. Sex. Behav., 29: 155–163.Google Scholar
Dawson-Scully, K., Armstrong, G. a. B., Kent, C., et al. 2007. Natural Variation in the Thermotolerance of Neural Function and Behavior Due to a cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase. Plos One, 2: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0000773.Google Scholar
Daxinger, L. & Whitelaw, E. 2014. Understanding Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance Via the Gametes in Mammals. Nat Rev Genet, 13: 153–62.Google Scholar
De Bono, M. & Bargmann, C. I. 1998. Natural Variation in a Neuropeptide Y Receptor Homolog Modifies Social Behavior and Food Response in C-Elegans. Cell, 94: 679–689.Google Scholar
De Smedt, J. & De Cruz, H. 2014. The Imago Dei as a Work in Progress: A Perspective from Paleoanthropology. Zygon, 49: 135–156.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. 2006a. In: Clayton, P. & Davies, P. (eds.) The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 2006b. Emergence: The Hole at the Wheel’s Hub. In: Clayton, P. & Davies, P. (eds.) The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Johnson, W. & Houlihan, L. M. 2009. Genetic Foundations of Human Intelligence. Hum. Genet., 126: 215–232.Google Scholar
Degler, C. 1991. In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Del Rio, C. M. & White, L. J. 2012. Separating Spirituality from Religiosity: A Hylomorphic Attitudinal Perspective. Psychol. Relig. Spiritual., 4: 123–142.Google Scholar
Deng, W., Aimone, J. B. & Gage, F. H. 2010. New Neurons and New Memories: How Does Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis Affect Learning and Memory? Nat Rev Neurosci, 11: 339–50.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. 2009. Behavioral Genetics Evidence in Criminal Cases: 1994–2007. In: Farahany, N. (ed.) The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. 2011. Courts’ Increasing Consideration of Behavioral Genetics Evidence in Criminal Cases: Results of a Longitudinal Study. Michigan State Law Review, 2011: 967–1047.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. 2013. What Real-World Criminal Cases Tell Us About Genetics Evidence. Hastings Law Journal, 64: 1591–1618.Google Scholar
Devlin, B., Daniels, M. & Roeder, K. 1997. The Heritability of IQ. Nature, 388: 468–71.Google Scholar
Di Francesco, M. 2010. The Varieties of Causal Emergentism. In: Corradini, A. & O’Connor, T. (eds.) Emergence in Science and Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dick, K. J., Nelson, C. P., Tsaprouni, L., et al. 2014. DNA Methylation and Body-Mass Index: A Genome-Wide Analysis. Lancet, 383: 1990–8.Google Scholar
Dinman, J. D. 2012. Control of Gene Expression by Translational Recoding. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol, 86: 129–49.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A. & Rutter, M. 2011. Gene-Environment Interactions in Developmental Psychopathology,New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Z. R. & Young, L. J. 2013. The Relative Contribution of Proximal 5’ Flanking Sequence and Microsatellite Variation on Brain Vasopressin 1a Receptor Avpr1a Gene Expression and Behavior. PLoS Genet, 9: e1003729.Google Scholar
Dowling, J. E. 2004. The Great Brain Debate: Nature or Nuture?,Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Drabant, E. M., Kiefer, A. K., Eriksson, N., et al. 2012. Genome-Wide Association Study of Sexual Orientation in a Large, Web-Based Cohort. 23andMe.Google Scholar
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., et al. 2004. Neuroplasticity: Changes in Grey Matter Induced by Training. Nature, 427: 311–2.Google Scholar
Drescher, J. 2008. A History of Homosexuality and Organized Psychoanalysis. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry, 36: 443–60.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L. 2011. The Significance of Self-Control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108: 2639–40.Google Scholar
Dugdale, R. L. 1877. “The Jukes”: A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease, and Heredity, New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Dunham, I., Kundaje, A., Aldred, S. F., et al. 2012. An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome. Nature, 489: 57–74.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. C. & Dobzhansky, T. 1952. Heredity, Race and Society,New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Dupree, M., Mustanski, B., Bocklandt, S., et al. 2004. A Candidate Gene Study of Cyp19 (Aromatase) and Male Sexual Orientation. Behav. Genet., 34: 243–250.Google Scholar
Duyme, M., Dumaret, A. C. & Tomkiewicz, S. 1999. How Can We Boost IQs of “Dull Children”?: A Late Adoption Study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96: 8790–4.Google Scholar
Eaves, L. J., Hatemi, P. K., Prom-Wornley, E. C., et al. 2008. Social and Genetic Influences on Adolescent Religious Attitudes and Practices. Soc. Forces, 86: 1621–1646.Google Scholar
Ebert, D. H. & Greenberg, M. E. 2013. Activity-Dependent Neuronal Signalling and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Nature, 493: 327–37.Google Scholar
Editorial 2015. Listen Up. Nature, 517: 121.Google Scholar
Edmonds, T. R. 1828. Practical Moral and Political Economy; or, the Government, Religion, and Institutions Most Conducive to Individual Happiness and to National Power: London. Effingham Wilson. Royal Exchange.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. C. & Mackay, T. F. C. 2009. Quantitative Trait Loci for Aggressive Behavior in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics, 182: 889–897.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. C., Rollmann, S. M., Morgan, T. J., et al. 2006. Quantitative Genomics of Aggressive Behavior in Drosophila Melanogaster. PLoS Genet, 2: e154.Google Scholar
Ellis, L. & Blanchard, R. 2001. Birth Order, Sibling Sex Ratio, and Maternal Miscarriages in Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women. Pers. Individ. Differ., 30: 543–552.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. J. & Peel, E. 2011. Lesbian Feminisms: Historical and Present Possibilities. Feminism & Psychology, 21: 198–204.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development,Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elston, R. C. & Gottesman, Ii 1968. The Analysis of Quantitative Inheritance Simultaneously with Twin and Family Data. Am J Hum Genet, 20: 512–21.Google Scholar
Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L. & Thornhill, R. 2010. Parasite Prevalence and the Worldwide Distribution of Cognitive Ability. Proc Biol Sci, 277: 3801–8.Google Scholar
Espinosa, J. S. & Stryker, M. P. 2012. Development and Plasticity of the Primary Visual Cortex. Neuron, 75: 230–49.Google Scholar
Estabrook, A. H. 1916. The Jukes in 1915. The Station For Experimental Evolution At Cold Spring Harbor, Paper No. 25.Google Scholar
Evans, J. H. 2016. What Is a Human? What the Answers Mean for Human Rights: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evrony, G. D., Cai, X., Lee, E., et al. 2012. Single-Neuron Sequencing Analysis of L1 Retrotransposition and Somatic Mutation in the Human Brain. Cell, 151: 483–96.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Kamin, L. J. 1981. The Intelligence Controversy.,New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fancher, R. E. 1983. Alphonse De Candolle, Francis Galton, and the Early History of the Nature-Nurture Controversy. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 19: 341–52.Google Scholar
Fancher, R. E. 1984. Not Conley, but Burt and Others: A Reply. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 20: 186–186.Google Scholar
Farahany, N. A. & Bernet, W. 2006. Behavioural Genetics in Criminal Cases: Past, Present and Future. Genomics, Society and Policy, 2: 72–79.Google Scholar
Farahany, N. A. & Coleman, J. 2006. Genetics and Responsibility: To Know the Criminal from the Crime. Law and Contemporary Problem, 69: 115–166.Google Scholar
Faraone, S. V., Tsuang, M. T. & Tsuang, D. W. 1999. Genetics of Mental Disorders: A Guide for Students, Clinicians, and Researchers,New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fass, D. M., Schroeder, F. A., Perlis, R. H., et al. 2014. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Mood Disorders: Targeting Neuroplasticity. Neuroscience, 264: 112–30.Google Scholar
Feschotte, C. & Pritham, E. J. 2007. DNA Transposons and the Evolution of Eukaryotic Genomes. Annu Rev Genet, 41: 331–68.Google Scholar
Ficks, C. A. & Waldman, I. D. 2014. Candidate Genes for Aggression and Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Association Studies of the 5HTTLPR and MAOA-uVNTR. Behav Genet, 44: 427–44.Google Scholar
Fink, S., Excoffier, L. & Heckel, G. 2006. Mammalian Monogamy Is Not Controlled by a Single Gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103: 10956–10960.Google Scholar
Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., et al. 2015. Functional Connectome Fingerprinting: Identifying Individuals Using Patterns of Brain Connectivity. Nat Neurosci, 18: 1664–71.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, M. J., Feder, E., Rowe, L., et al. 2007. Maintaining a Behaviour Polymorphism by Frequency-Dependent Selection on a Single Gene. Nature, 447: 210-U5.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. 2012. Are We Getting Smarter?: Rising IQ in the Twenty-First Century: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forsythe, P., Bienenstock, J. & Kunze, W. A. 2014. Vagal Pathways for Microbiome-Brain-Gut Axis Communication. Adv Exp Med Biol, 817: 115–33.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. H., Baker, L. A. & Dawes, C. T. 2008. Genetic Variation in Political Participation. American Political Science Review, 102: 233–248.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. S., Alia-Klein, N., Kriplani, A., et al. 2007. Evidence That Brain MAOA Activity Does Not Correspond to MAOA Genotype in Healthy Male Subjects. Biological Psychiatry, 62: 355–358.Google Scholar
Fox, S. E., Levitt, P. & Nelson, C. A., 3rd 2010. How the Timing and Quality of Early Experiences Influence the Development of Brain Architecture. Child Dev, 81: 28–40.Google Scholar
Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Paz, M. F., et al. 2005. Epigenetic Differences Arise During the Lifetime of Monozygotic Twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102: 10604–10609.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Algoe, S. B., et al. 2015. Psychological Well-Being and the Human Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity. PLoS One, 10: e0121839.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Coffey, K. A., et al. 2013. A Functional Genomic Perspective on Human Well-Being. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110: 13684–9.Google Scholar
Friesen, A. & Ksiazkiewicz, A. 2015. Do Political Attitudes and Religiosity Share a Genetic Path? Political Behavior, 37: 791–818.Google Scholar
Frisen, L., Nordenstrom, A., Falhammar, H., et al. 2009. Gender Role Behavior, Sexuality, and Psychosocial Adaptation in Women with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Due to CYP21A2 Deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 94: 3432–9.Google Scholar
Fromer, M., Pocklington, A. J., Kavanagh, D. H., et al. 2014. De Novo Mutations in Schizophrenia Implicate Synaptic Networks. Nature, 506: 179–84.Google Scholar
Galton, F. 1876. A Theory of Heredity. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 5: 329–348.Google Scholar
Garrod, A. E. 1902. The Incidence of Alkaptonuria: A Study in Chemical Individuality. Lancet, 160: 1616–1620.Google Scholar
Gartrell, N. K., Bos, H. M. W. & Goldberg, N. G. 2011. Adolescents of the US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study: Sexual Orientation, Sexual Behavior, and Sexual Risk Exposure. Arch. Sex. Behav., 40: 1199–1209.Google Scholar
Gates, G. J. 2011. How Many People Are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender? Los Angeles: Williams Institute.Google Scholar
Genomes Project. 2015. A Global Reference for Human Genetic Variation. Nature, 526: 68–74.Google Scholar
Gervin, K., Hammero, M., Akselsen, H. E., et al. 2011. Extensive Variation and Low Heritability of DNA Methylation Identified in a Twin Study. Genome Res, 21: 1813–21.Google Scholar
Geschwind, D. H. & State, M. W. 2015. Gene Hunting in Autism Spectrum Disorder: On the Path to Precision Medicine. Lancet Neurol.Google Scholar
Ghiglieri, M. P. 1999. The Dark Side of Man: Tracing the Origins of Male Violence, Reading, Mass.: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A. 2004. American Association of Physical Anthropologists Meeting. Tracking the Evolutionary History of a “Warrior” Gene. Science, 304: 818.Google Scholar
Gilbert, W. 1992. A Vision of the Grail. In: Kevles, D. a. H., L (ed.) The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 2003. Strong Emergence as a Defense of Non-Reductive Physicalism: A Physicalist Metaphysics for “Downward Causation”. Principia, 6: 83–114.Google Scholar
Gillette, A. 2011. Eugenics and the Nature-Nurture Debate in the Twentieth Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giubilini, A. & Minerva, F. 2013. After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live? Journal of Medical Ethics, 39: 261–263.Google Scholar
Glover, V., O’Connor, T. G. & O’Donnell, K. 2010. Prenatal Stress and the Programming of the HPA Axis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35: 17–22.Google Scholar
Goddard, H. H. 1910. Four Hundred Feeble-Minded Children Classified by the Binet Method. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 15: 17–30.Google Scholar
Goddard, H. H. 1927. The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness,New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. 1990. An Alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five Factor Structure. J Pers Soc Psychol, 59: 1216–29.Google Scholar
Goldhaber, D. 2012. The Nature-Nurture Debate: Bridging the Gap: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, J. K., Waters, J. L., Poole, A. C., et al. 2014. Human Genetics Shape the Gut Microbiome. Cell, 159: 789–99.Google Scholar
Gordon, L., Joo, J. E., Powell, J. E., et al. 2012. Neonatal DNA Methylation Profile in Human Twins Is Specified by a Complex Interplay between Intrauterine Environmental and Genetic Factors, Subject to Tissue-Specific Influence. Genome Res, 22: 1395–406.Google Scholar
Gottesman, I. I. & Wolfgram, D. L. 1991. Schizophrenia Genesis: The Origins of Madness, New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. & Saklofske, D. H. 2009. Intelligence: Foundations and Issues in Assessment. Can. Psychol.-Psychol. Can., 50: 183–195.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. 1992. Individual Development and Evolution: The Genesis of Novel Behavior: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. 1998. Normally Occurring Environmental and Behavioral Influences on Gene Activity: From Central Dogma to Probabilistic Epigenesis. Psychol Rev, 105: 792–802.Google Scholar
Graff, J., Joseph, N. F., Horn, M. E., et al. 2014. Epigenetic Priming of Memory Updating During Reconsolidation to Attenuate Remote Fear Memories. Cell, 156: 261–76.Google Scholar
Grant, M. & Osborn, H. F. 1916. The Passing of the Great Race: Or the Racial Basis of European History,New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Gravina, S., Ganapathi, S. & Vijg, J. 2015. Single-Cell, Locus-Specific Bisulfite Sequencing (SLBS) for Direct Detection of Epimutations in DNA Methylation Patterns. Nucleic Acids Res. 43: e93.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M., Karow, D. S., Lu, H., et al. 2004. Oxygen Sensation and Social Feeding Mediated by a C. Elegans Guanylate Cyclase Homologue. Nature, 430: 317–22.Google Scholar
Green, J. B. 2003. Science, Religion and the Mind-Brain Problem – the Case of Thomas Willis (1621–1675). Science and Christian Belief, 15: 165–185.Google Scholar
Green, J. B. 2004. What About the Soul?: Neuroscience and Christian Anthropology,Edinburgh: Alban.Google Scholar
Green, J. B. 2008. Body, Soul, and Human Life: The Nature of Humanity in the Bible, Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Greene, E. & Cahill, B. S. 2012. Effects of Neuroimaging Evidence on Mock Juror Decision Making. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30: 280–296.Google Scholar
Greene, J. & Cohen, J. 2004. For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 359: 1775–85.Google Scholar
Greenfield, S. M. 2001. Nature/Nurture and the Anthropology of Franz Boas and Margaret Mead as an Agenda for Revolutionary Politics Horizontes Antropológicos, 7: 35–52.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. D. 1999. Understanding the “Cognitive Revolution” in Psychology. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 35: 1–22.Google Scholar
Greer, E. L., Maures, T. J., Ucar, D., et al. 2011. Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance of Longevity in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Nature, 479: 365–71.Google Scholar
Grenz, S. J. 2001. The Social God and the Relational Self: A Trinitarian Theology of the Imago Dei,Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. & Stotz, K. 2013. Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 2004. Instinct in the ‘50s: The British Reception of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive Behavior. Biol. Philos., 19: 609–631.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E., Lorenz, K. & Tinbergen, N. 2008. History of Ethology Comes of Age. Biol. Philos., 23: 129–134.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. & Tabery, J. 2008. Behavioral Genetics and Development: Historical and Conceptual Causes of Controversy. New Ideas in Psychology, 26: 332–352.Google Scholar
Groff, P. & Mcrae, L. 1998. The Nature-Nurture Debate in Thirteenth-Century France. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August 1998.Google Scholar
Guo, G., Ou, X. M., Roettger, M., et al. 2008. The VNTR 2 Repeat in MAOA and Delinquent Behavior in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: Associations and MAOA Promoter Activity. Eur J Hum Genet, 16: 626–34.Google Scholar
Gurian, M. 2009. Nurture the Nature: Understanding and Supporting Your Child’s Unique Core Personality,San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Gushee, D. P. 2013. The Sacredness of Human Life: Why an Ancient Biblical Vision Is Key to the World’s Future,Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Haberstick, B. C., Lessem, J. M., Hewitt, J. K., et al. 2014. MAOA Genotype, Childhood Maltreatment, and Their Interaction in the Etiology of Adult Antisocial Behaviors. Biol Psychiatry, 75: 25–30.Google Scholar
Haggard, P. 2015. “Free Will”: Components and Processes. In: Mele, A. R. (ed.) Surrounding Free Will. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, D. J. 1986. Imaging God: Dominion as Stewardship,Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co;.Google Scholar
Hall, J., Philip, R. C., Marwick, K., et al. 2013. Social Cognition, the Male Brain and the Autism Spectrum. PLoS One, 7: e49033.Google Scholar
Hallmayer, J., Cleveland, S., Torres, A., et al. 2011. Genetic Heritability and Shared Environmental Factors among Twin Pairs with Autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 68: 1095–102.Google Scholar
Hamer, D. H. 2004. The God Gene: How Faith Is Hardwired into Our Genes,New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hamer, D. H. & Copeland, P. 1994. The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behaviour,New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., et al. 1993. A Linkage Betweeen DNA Markers on the X-Chromosome and Male Sexual Orientation. Science, 261: 321–327.Google Scholar
Hammock, E. a. D. & Young, L. J. 2002. Variation in the Vasopressin V1a Receptor Promoter and Expression: Implications for Inter- and Intraspecific Variation in Social Behaviour. European Journal of Neuroscience, 16: 399–402.Google Scholar
Hanage, W. P. 2014. Microbiology: Microbiome Science Needs a Healthy Dose of Scepticism. Nature, 512: 247–8.Google Scholar
Hart, D. B. 2009. Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies,New Haven Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K. 2012. The Intersection of Behavioral Genetics and Political Science: Introduction to the Special Issue. Twin Res Hum Genet, 15: 1–5.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Dawes, C. T., Frost-Keller, A., et al. 2011. Integrating Social Science and Genetics: News from the Political Front. Biodemography Soc Biol, 57: 67–87.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Funk, C. L., Medland, S. E., et al. 2009. Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Attitudes over a Life Time. The Journal of Politics, 71: 1141–1156.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Medland, S. E., et al. 2010. Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Family Design to Investigate Genetic Influence on Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 54: 798–814.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K. & Mcdermott, R. 2012. The Genetics of Politics: Discovery, Challenges, and Progress. Trends in Genetics, 28: 525–533.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., et al. 2014. Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 Measures of Political Ideologies from Five Democracies and Genome-Wide Findings from Three Populations. Behav Genet, 44: 282–94.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Morley, K. I., et al. 2007. The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study. Behav. Genet., 37: 435–448.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K. & Verhulst, B. 2015. Political Attitudes Develop Independently of Personality Traits. PLoS One, 10: e0118106.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, K., Shimizu, T., Ohba, Y., et al. 1992. Intrapair Differences of Physical Aging and Longevity in Identical Twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma), 41: 177–85.Google Scholar
Heard, E. & Martienssen, R. A. 2014. Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Myths and Mechanisms. Cell, 157: 95–109.Google Scholar
Hedgecoe, A. 1998. Geneticization, Medicalisation and Polemics. Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 1: 235–43.Google Scholar
Heijmans, B. T., Tobi, E. W., Stein, A. D., et al. 2008. Persistent Epigenetic Differences Associated with Prenatal Exposure to Famine in Humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105: 17046–9.Google Scholar
Heldriss of Cornwall, Sarah, R.-M. (Ed. And Trans.) c. 1250–1300. Silence,East Lansing, MI: Colleagues Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Herrmann, C. S., Pauen, M., Min, B. K., et al. 2008. Analysis of a Choice-Reaction Task Yields a New Interpretation of Libet’s Experiments. International journal of psychophysiology: official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 67: 151–7.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. A. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life,New York Free Press.Google Scholar
Heston, L. L. 1966. Psychiatric Disorders in Foster Home Reared Children of Schizophrenic Mothers. Br J Psychiatry, 112: 819–25.Google Scholar
Hibar, D. P., Stein, J. L., Renteria, M. E., et al. 2015. Common Genetic Variants Influence Human Subcortical Brain Structures. Nature, 520: 224–9.Google Scholar
Hines, M. 2011. Prenatal Endocrine Influences on Sexual Orientation and on Sexually Differentiated Childhood Behavior. Front. Neuroendocrinol., 32: 170–182.Google Scholar
Hines, M., Ahmed, S. F. & Hughes, I. 2003. Psychological Outcomes and Gender-Related Development in Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. Arch. Sex. Behav., 32: 93–101.Google Scholar
Hitler, A., Johnson, A. S., Chamberlain, J., et al. 1939. Mein Kampf: Complete and Unabridged, Fully Annotated,New York: Reynal & Hitchcock.Google Scholar
Hobert, O. 2010. Neurogenesis in the Nematode Caenorhabditis Elegans. In: Community, T. C. E. R. (ed.) Wormbook: Doi/10.1895/Wormbook.1.12.1.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, J. & Doniach, T. 1997. Natural Variation and Copulatory Plug Formation in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Genetics, 146: 149–164.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A. & Spengler, D. 2014. DNA Memories of Early Social Life. Neuroscience, 264: 64–75.Google Scholar
Hogben, L. 1932. Genetic Principles in Medicine and Social Science,New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Holmgren, M. & Rosenthal, J. J. 2015. Regulation of Ion Channel and Transporter Function through RNA Editing. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 17: 23–36.Google Scholar
Hooker, E. 1957. The Adjustment of the Male Overt Homosexual. Journal of Projective Techniques, 21: 18–31.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. 1993. From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World. Mind & Language, 102: 555–586.Google Scholar
Horvath, S. 2013. DNA Methylation Age of Human Tissues and Cell Types. Genome Biol, 14: R115.Google Scholar
Huberman, A. D., Feller, M. B. & Chapman, B. 2008. Mechanisms Underlying Development of Visual Maps and Receptive Fields. Annu Rev Neurosci, 31: 479–509.Google Scholar
Hudziak, J. J., Albaugh, M. D., Ducharme, S., et al. 2014. Cortical Thickness Maturation and Duration of Music Training: Health-Promoting Activities Shape Brain Development. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 53: 1153–61.Google Scholar
Huizinga, D., Haberstick, B. C., Smolen, A., et al. 2006. Childhood Maltreatment, Subsequent Antisocial Behavior, and the Role of Monoamine Oxidase A Genotype. Biol Psychiatry, 60: 677–83.Google Scholar
Hume, D., Selby-Bigge, L. A. & Nidditch, P. H. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals Sect X, Pt IOxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, C. & Handal, P. J. 2006. Definitions and Evaluation of Religion and Spirituality Items by Religious Professionals: A Pilot Study. J. Relig. Health, 45: 264–282.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R. 2010. The Challenge of Translation in Social Neuroscience: A Review of Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Affiliative Behavior. Neuron, 65: 768–779.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P., Ntzani, E. E., Trikalinos, T. A., et al. 2001. Replication Validity of Genetic Association Studies. Nat Genet, 29: 306–9.Google Scholar
Iossifov, I., O’roak, B. J., Sanders, S. J., et al. 2014. The Contribution of De Novo Coding Mutations to Autism Spectrum Disorder. Nature, 515: 216–21.Google Scholar
Iourov, I. Y., Vorsanova, S. G., Liehr, T., et al. 2009. Aneuploidy in the Normal, Alzheimer’s Disease and Ataxia-Telangiectasia Brain: Differential Expression and Pathological Meaning. Neurobiol Dis, 34: 212–20.Google Scholar
Ismael, J. T. 2015. On Being Someone. In: Mele, A. R. (ed.) Surrounding Free Will. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E. & Raz, G. 2009. Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Implications for the Study of Heredity and Evolution. Q Rev Biol, 84: 131–76.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P. A., Brunton, M., Melville, M. M., et al. 1965. Aggressive Behavior, Mental Sub-Normality and the XYY Male. Nature, 208: 1351–2.Google Scholar
Jamieson, A. & Radick, G. 2013. Putting Mendel in His Place: How Curriculum Reform in Genetics and Counterfactual History of Science Can Work Together. In: Kampourakis, K. (ed.) The Philosophy of Biology. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Jang, K. L., Mccrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., et al. 1998. Heritability of Facet-Level Traits in a Cross-Cultural Twin Sample: Support for a Hierarchical Model of Personality. J Pers Soc Psychol, 74: 1556–65.Google Scholar
Jarrell, T. A., Wang, Y., Bloniarz, A. E., et al. 2012. The Connectome of a Decision-Making Neural Network. Science, 337: 437–44.Google Scholar
Jayaratne, T. E., Gelman, S. A., Feldbaum, M., et al. 2009. The Perennial Debate: Nature, Nurture, or Choice? Black and White Americans’ Explanations for Individual Differences. Rev. Gen. Psychol., 13: 24–33.Google Scholar
Jeeves, M. A. 2011. Rethinking Human Nature: A Multidisciplinary Approach,Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Jeeves, M. A. 2015. The Emergence of Personhood: A Quantum Leap?,Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1969. How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39: 1–123.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1970. Race and the Genetics of Intelligence: A Reply to Lewontin. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26: 17–23.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 2000. The G Factor: Psychometrics and Biology. Novartis Found Symp, 233: 37–47; discussion 47–57, 116–21.Google Scholar
Jewett, R. 1971. Paul’s Anthropological Terms; a Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings,Leiden,: Brill.Google Scholar
Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., et al. 2015. Sex Beyond the Genitalia: The Human Brain Mosaic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112: 15468–73.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. B., Kawasawa, Y. I., Mason, C. E., et al. 2009. Functional and Evolutionary Insights into Human Brain Development through Global Transcriptome Analysis. Neuron, 62: 494–509.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Krueger, R. F., et al. 2004. Just One G: Consistent Results from Three Test Batteries. Intelligence, 32: 95–107.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., Penke, L. & Spinath, F. M. 2011. Heritability in the Era of Molecular Genetics: Some Thoughts for Understanding Genetic Influences on Behavioural Traits. European Journal of Personality, 25: 254–266.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., Te Nijenhuis, J. & Bouchard, T. J. 2008. Still Just 1 G: Consistent Results from Five Test Batteries. Intelligence, 36: 81–95.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. S. 2002. Shades of Sheol – Death and Afterlife in the Old Testament, Leicester: Apollos.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. M., Frangakis, S. G., Golzio, C., et al. 2015. Identification of Cis-Suppression of Human Disease Mutations by Comparative Genomics. Nature, 524: 225–9.Google Scholar
Jorde, L. B., Hasstedt, S. J., Ritvo, E. R., et al. 1991. Complex Segregation Analysis of Autism. Am J Hum Genet, 49: 932–8.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. 2004. The Gene Illusion: Genetic Research in Psychiatry and Psychology under the Microscope. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. 2010. Genetic Research in Psychiatry and Psychology. Hood, K.E. Et Al Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. 2012. The Fruitless Search for Genes in Psychiatry and Psychology: Time to Re-Examine a Paradigm. In: Krimsky, S. & Gruber, J. (eds.) Genetic Explanations: Sense and Nonsense. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. 2013. The Use of the Classical Twin Method in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: The Fallacy Continues. J. Mind Behav., 34: 1–39.Google Scholar
Joshi, P. K., Esko, T., Mattsson, H., et al. 2015. Directional Dominance on Stature and Cognition in Diverse Human Populations. Nature, 523: 459–62.Google Scholar
Joubert, B. R., Haberg, S. E., Nilsen, R. M., et al. 2012. 450K Epigenome-Wide Scan Identifies Differential DNA Methylation in Newborns Related to Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect, 120: 1425–31.Google Scholar
Jovelin, R., Ajie, B. C. & Phillips, P. C. 2003. Molecular Evolution and Quantitative Variation for Chemosensory Behaviour in the Nematode Genus Caenorhabditis. Mol. Ecol., 12: 1325–1337.Google Scholar
Kaati, G., Bygren, L. O. & Edvinsson, S. 2002. Cardiovascular and Diabetes Mortality Determined by Nutrition During Parents’ and Grandparents’ Slow Growth Period. Eur J Hum Genet, 10: 682–8.Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. & Goldberger, A. S. 2002. Twin Studies in Behavioral Research: A Skeptical View. Theor Popul Biol, 61: 83–95.Google Scholar
Kammenga, J. E., Phillips, P. C., De Bono, M., et al. 2008. Beyond Induced Mutants: Using Worms to Study Natural Variation in Genetic Pathways. Trends in Genetics, 24: 178–185.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, K. 2015. That Gregor Mendel Was a Lonely Pioneer of Genetics, Being Ahead of His Time In: Numbers, R. L. & Kampourakis, K. (eds.) Newton’s Apple and Other Myths About Science. Cambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W. & Riemann, R. 2012. Left or Right? Sources of Political Orientation: The Roles of Genetic Factors, Cultural Transmission, Assortative Mating, and Personality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 102: 633–645.Google Scholar
Kandler, C. & Riemann, R. 2013. Genetic and Environmental Sources of Individual Religiousness: The Roles of Individual Personality Traits and Perceived Environmental Religiousness. Behav Genet, 43: 297–313.Google Scholar
Kang, D. H., Jo, H. J., Jung, W. H., et al. 2012. The Effect of Meditation on Brain Structure: Cortical Thickness Mapping and Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 8: 27–33.Google Scholar
Kang, D. W., Park, J. G., Ilhan, Z. E., et al. 2013. Reduced Incidence of Prevotella and Other Fermenters in Intestinal Microflora of Autistic Children. PLoS One, 8: e68322.Google Scholar
Kang, R., Wan, J., Arstikaitis, P., et al. 2008. Neural Palmitoyl-Proteomics Reveals Dynamic Synaptic Palmitoylation. Nature, 456: 904–9.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaprio, J. 2012. Twins and the Mystery of Missing Heritability: The Contribution of Gene-Environment Interactions. J Intern Med. 272: 440–448.Google Scholar
Karg, K., Burmeister, M., Shedden, K., et al. 2011. The Serotonin Transporter Promoter Variant (5-HTTLPR), Stress, and Depression Meta-Analysis Revisited: Evidence of Genetic Modification. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 68: 444–54.Google Scholar
Kaun, K. R., Chakaborty-Chatterjee, M. & Sokolowski, M. B. 2008. Natural Variation in Plasticity of Glucose Homeostasis and Food Intake. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211: 3160–3166.Google Scholar
Kaun, K. R., Devineni, A. V. & Heberlein, U. 2012. Drosophila Melanogaster as a Model to Study Drug Addiction. Hum. Genet., 131: 959–975.Google Scholar
Kaun, K. R., Hendel, T., Gerber, B., et al. 2007. Natural Variation in Drosophila Larval Reward Learning and Memory Due to a cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase. Learn. Mem., 14: 342–349.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Y., Ito, K., Sun, H., et al. 2004. Glutamate Receptors: RNA Editing and Death of Motor Neurons. Nature, 427: 801.Google Scholar
Keating, D. P. 2013. Nature and Nurture in Early Child Development,Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, E. 1992. Nature, Nurture and the Human Genome Project. In: Kevles, D. a. H., L (ed.) The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, , E. F. 2010a. Foreword. In: Hood, K. E., Halpern, C. T., Greenberg, G., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Developmental Science, Behavior, and Genetics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 2010b. The Mirage of a Space between Nature and Nurture,Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, J. 2005. In Genes We Trust: The Biological Component of Psychological Essentialism and Its Relationship to Mechanisms of Motivated Social Cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol, 88: 686–702.Google Scholar
Kelley, R. A., Castelli, F. R., Mabry, K. E., et al. 2013. Effects of Experience and Avpr1a Microsatellite Length on Parental Care in Male Prairie Voles (Microtus Ochrogaster). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67: 985–992.Google Scholar
Kendler, , K. S. 2005. A Gene for ...: The Nature of Gene Action in Psychiatric Disorders. Am. J. Psychiat., 162: 1243–1252.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. & Gardner, C. O. 1998. Twin Studies of Adult Psychiatric and Substance Dependence Disorders: Are They Biased by Differences in the Environmental Experiences of Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins in Childhood and Adolescence? Psychol. Med., 28: 625–633.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Gardner, C. O. & Prescott, C. A. 1997. Religion, Psychopathology, and Substance Use and Abuse: A Multimeasure, Genetic-Epidemiologic Study. Am. J. Psychiat., 154: 322–329.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. & Myers, J. 2009. A Developmental Twin Study of Church Attendance and Alcohol and Nicotine Consumption: A Model for Analyzing the Changing Impact of Genes and Environment. Am. J. Psychiat., 166: 1150–1155.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., Gilman, S. E., et al. 2000. Sexual Orientation in a US National Sample of Twin and Nontwin Sibling Pairs. Am. J. Psychiat., 157: 1843–1846.Google Scholar
Kent, C. F., Daskalchuk, T., Cook, L., et al. 2009. The Drosophila Foraging Gene Mediates Adult Plasticity and Gene-Environment Interactions in Behaviour, Metabolites, and Gene Expression in Response to Food Deprivation. PLoS Genet, 5: e1000609.Google Scholar
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. & Amos, A. 1998. Eugenics and the New Genetics in Britain: Examining Contemporary Professionals’ Accounts. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23: 175–198.Google Scholar
Khandaker, G. M. 2015. Inflammation and Immunity in Schizophrenia: Implications for Pathophysiology and Treatment. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2: 258–270.Google Scholar
Kiive, E., Laas, K., Akkermann, K., et al. 2014. Mitigating Aggressiveness through Education? The Monoamine Oxidase A Genotype and Mental Health in General Population. Acta Neuropsychiatr, 26: 19–28.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1989. The Myth of Nonreductive Physicalism’. Proceedings and Addresses of the Amerian Philosophical Association 63: 31–47.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1994. Supervenience and Mind. In: Guttenplan, S. (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Leventhal, B. L., Koh, Y. J., et al. 2011. Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Total Population Sample. Am J Psychiatry, 168: 904–12.Google Scholar
Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., et al. 2006. MAOA, Maltreatment, and Gene-Environment Interaction Predicting Children’s Mental Health: New Evidence and a Meta-Analysis. Mol Psychiatry, 11: 903–13.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, B. A. 1983. The American Breeders’ Association: Genetics and Eugenics in an Agricultural Context, 1903–13. Soc Stud Sci, 13: 163–204.Google Scholar
King, J. S. 2012. Genetic Tests: Politics and Fetal Diagnostics Collide. Nature, 491: 33–4.Google Scholar
King, M. D. & Bearman, P. S. 2011. Socioeconomic Status and the Increased Prevalence of Autism in California. Am Sociol Rev, 76: 320–346.Google Scholar
Kiontke, K. & Sudhaus, W. 2006. Ecology of Caenorhabditis Species. Wormbook: Doi/10.1895/Wormbook.1.37.1.Google Scholar
Kirk, K. M., Eaves, L. J. & Martin, N. G. 1999. Self-Transcendence as a Measure of Spirituality in a Sample of Older Australian Twins. Twin Research, 2: 81–7.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R. M., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., et al. 2014. Results of a “GWAS Plus:” General Cognitive Ability Is Substantially Heritable and Massively Polygenic. PLoS One, 9: e112390.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, J. 2005. Constructing and Deconstructing the “Gay Gene”: Media Reporting of Genetics, Sexual Diversity and “Deviance”. In: Ellison, G. & Goodman, A. (eds.) The Nature of Difference: Science, Society and Human Biology. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Klemmensen, R., Hatemi, P. K., Hobolt, S. B., et al. 2012. Heritability in Political Interest and Efficacy across Cultures: Denmark and the United States. Twin Res Hum Genet, 15: 15–20.Google Scholar
Klingberg, T. 2013. The Learning Brain: Memory and Brain Development in Children: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knopik, V. S., Maccani, M. A., Francazio, S., et al. 2012. The Epigenetics of Maternal Cigarette Smoking During Pregnancy and Effects on Child Development. Development and Psychopathology, 24: 1377–1390.Google Scholar
Knouse, K. A., Wu, J., Whittaker, C. A., et al. 2014. Single Cell Sequencing Reveals Low Levels of Aneuploidy across Mammalian Tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111: 13409–14.Google Scholar
Koenig, H. G., King, D. E. & Carson, V. B. 2012. Handbook of Religion and Health: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, L. B., McGue, M. & Iacono, W. G. 2008. Stability and Change in Religiousness During Emerging Adulthood. Dev. Psychol., 44: 532–543.Google Scholar
Koenig, L. B., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., et al. 2005. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Religiousness: Findings for Retrospective and Current Religiousness Ratings. J. Pers., 73: 471–488.Google Scholar
Kolber, A. J. 2014. Will There Be a Neurolaw Revolution? Indiana Law Journal, 89: 807–845.Google Scholar
Kowal, E. & Frederic, G. 2012. Race, Genetic Determinism and the Media: An Exploratory Study of Media Coverage of Genetics and Indigenous Australians. Genomics, Society and Policy, 2?: 1–14.Google Scholar
Krackow, S. & König, B. 2008. Microsatellite Length Polymorphisms Associated with Dispersal-Related Agonistic Onset in Male Wild House Mice (Mus Musculus Domesticus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62: 813–820.Google Scholar
Krahn, T. M. & Fenton, A. 2012. The Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism and the Potential Adverse Effects for Boys and Girls with Autism. J Bioeth Inq, 9: 93–103.Google Scholar
Krawczak, M., Trefilov, A., Berard, J., et al. 2005. Male Reproductive Timing in Rhesus Macaques Is Influenced by the 5HTTLPR Promoter Polymorphism of the Serotonin Transporter Gene. Biology of Reproduction, 72: 1109–1113.Google Scholar
Kriwaczek, P. 2010. Babylon: Mesopotamia and the Birth of Civilization,London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., South, S., Johnson, W., et al. 2008. The Heritability of Personality Is Not Always 50%: Gene-Environment Interactions and Correlations between Personality and Parenting. J Pers, 76: 1485–522.Google Scholar
Kuepper, Y., Grant, P., Wielpuetz, C., et al. 2013. MAOA-UVNTR Genotype Predicts Interindividual Differences in Experimental Aggressiveness as a Function of the Degree of Provocation. Behavioural Brain Research, 247: 73–78.Google Scholar
Kumar, U., Guleria, A., Kishan, S. S., et al. 2013. Effect of Soham Meditation on Human Brain: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study. J Neuroimaging, 24: 187–90.Google Scholar
Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., et al. 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lander, E. S. & Schork, N. J. 1994. Genetic Dissection of Complex Traits. Science, 265: 2037–48.Google Scholar
Langstrom, N., Rahman, Q., Carlstrom, E., et al. 2010. Genetic and Environmental Effects on Same-Sex Sexual Behavior: A Population Study of Twins in Sweden. Arch. Sex. Behav., 39: 75–80.Google Scholar
Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S. E., et al. 2015. Don’t Edit the Human Germ Line. Nature, 519: 410–1.Google Scholar
Larson, E. 2010. Biology and the Emergence of the Anglo-American Eugenics Movement. In: Alexander, D. R. & Numbers, R. L. (eds.) Biology and Ideology – from Descartes to Dawkins. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lasco, M. S., Jordan, T. J., Edgar, M. A., et al. 2002. A Lack of Dimorphism of Sex or Sexual Orientation in the Human Anterior Commissure. Brain Research, 936: 95–98.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. 2010. Societal Individualism Predicts Prevalence of Nonhomosexual Orientation in Male-to-Female Transsexualism. Arch. Sex. Behav., 39: 573–583.Google Scholar
Lea, R. & Chambers, G. 2007. Monoamine Oxidase, Addiction, and the “Warrior” Gene Hypothesis. N Z Med J, 120: U2441.Google Scholar
Lee, M. T., Bonneau, A. R. & Giraldez, A. J. 2014. Zygotic Genome Activation During the Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 30: 581–613.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2009. Aristotle. In: Ruse, M. & Travis, J. (eds.) Evolution – the First Four Billion Years. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levay, S. 1991. A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure between Heterosexual and Homosexual Men. Science, 253: 1034–1037.Google Scholar
Levelt, C. N. & Hubener, M. 2012. Critical-Period Plasticity in the Visual Cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci, 35: 309–30.Google Scholar
Levitt, M. 2013. Genes, Environment and Responsibility for Violent Behavior: “Whatever Genes One Has It Is Preferable That You Are Prevented from Going around Stabbing People”. New Genet. Soc., 32: 4–17.Google Scholar
Levy, S., Sutton, G., Ng, P. C., et al. 2007. The Diploid Genome Sequence of an Individual Human. PLoS Biol, 5: e254.Google Scholar
Lewis, , G. B. 2009. Does Believing Homosexuality Is Innate Increase Support for Gay Rights? Policy Studies Journal, 37: 669–693.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. W. & Murray, R. M. 1987. Obstetric Complications, Neurodevelopmental Deviance, and Risk of Schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res, 21: 413–21.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. L. & Maurer, D. 2005. Multiple Sensitive Periods in Human Visual Development: Evidence from Visually Deprived Children. Dev Psychobiol, 46: 163–83.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1975. Genetic Aspects of Intelligence. Annual Reviews of Genetics, 9: 387–405.Google Scholar
Liang, J., Cai, W. & Sun, Z. 2014. Single-Cell Sequencing Technologies: Current and Future. J Genet Genomics, 41: 513–28.Google Scholar
Liang, P., Xu, Y., Zhang, X., et al. 2015. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Human Tripronuclear Zygotes. Protein Cell, 6: 363–72.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, P., Yip, B. H., Bjork, C., et al. 2009. Common Genetic Determinants of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder in Swedish Families: A Population-Based Study. Lancet, 373: 234–9.Google Scholar
Lim, J. P. & Brunet, A. 2013. Bridging the Transgenerational Gap with Epigenetic Memory. Trends Genet, 29: 176–86.Google Scholar
Lim, M. M., Wang, Z. X., Olazabal, D. E., et al. 2004. Enhanced Partner Preference in a Promiscuous Species by Manipulating the Expression of a Single Gene. Nature, 429: 754–757.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. 2008. Sex Differences and Sexual Orientation Differences in Personality: Findings from the BBC Internet Survey. Arch. Sex. Behav., 37: 173–187.Google Scholar
Ljungquist, B., Berg, S., Lanke, J., et al. 1998. The Effect of Genetic Factors for Longevity: A Comparison of Identical and Fraternal Twins in the Swedish Twin Registry. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 53: M441–6.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C. & Nichols, R. C. 1976. Heredity, Environment and Personality: A Study of 850 Sets of Twins.: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Logan, C. A. & Johnston, T. D. 2007. Synthesis and Separation in the History of “Nature” and “Nurture”. Dev. Psychobiol., 49: 758–769.Google Scholar
Lu, R. B., Lee, J. F., Ko, H. C., et al. 2002. No Association of the MAOA Gene with Alcoholism among Han Chinese Males in Taiwan. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 26: 457–61.Google Scholar
Ludeke, S., Johnson, W. & BouchardJr, T. J. 2013. “Obedience to Traditional Authority:” a Heritable Factor Underlying Authoritarianism, Conservatism and Religiousness. Pers. Individ. Differ., 55: 375–380.Google Scholar
Ludmerer, K. M. 1972. Genetics and American Society: A Historical Appraisal, Baltimore,: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. 1940. Intra-Sire Correlations or Regressions of Offspring on Dam as a Method of Estimating Heritability of Characteristics. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim.Prod., 33: 293–301Google Scholar
Lutz, P. E. & Turecki, G. 2014. DNA Methylation and Childhood Maltreatment: From Animal Models to Human Studies. Neuroscience, 264: 142–56.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., et al. 1990. Does Contact Lead to Similarity or Similarity to Contact? Behav Genet, 20: 547–61.Google Scholar
Lynch, J., Bevan, J., Achter, P., et al. 2008. A Preliminary Study of How Multiple Exposures to Messages About Genetics Impact on Lay Attitudes Towards Racial and Genetic Discrimination. New Genet. Soc., 27: 43–56.Google Scholar
Mabry, K. E., Streatfeild, C. A., Keane, B., et al. 2011. Avpr1a Length Polymorphism Is Not Associated with Either Social or Genetic Monogamy in Free-Living Prairie Voles. Animal Behaviour, 81: 11–18.Google Scholar
Macaulay, I. C., Haerty, W., Kumar, P., et al. 2015. G&T-Seq: Parallel Sequencing of Single-Cell Genomes and Transcriptomes. Nat Methods. 12: 519–522.Google Scholar
MacGregor, A. J., Snieder, H., Rigby, A. S., et al. 2000. Characterizing the Quantitative Genetic Contribution to Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Data from Twins. Arthritis Rheum, 43: 30–7.Google Scholar
Machin, G. 2009. Non-Identical Monozygotic Twins, Intermediate Twin Types, Zygosity Testing, and the Non-Random Nature of Monozygotic Twinning. Am. J. Med. Genet. C, 151C: 110–127.Google Scholar
Machin, G. A. 2004. Why Is It Important to Diagnose Chorionicity and How Do We Do It? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 18: 515–30.Google Scholar
Macke, J. P., Hu, N., Hu, S., et al. 1993. Sequence Variation in the Androgen Receptor Gene Is Not a Common Determinant of Male Sexual Orientation. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 53: 844–852.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1980. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation,Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. 2011. History of Theories and Measurement of Intelligence. In: Sternberg, R. & Kaufman, S. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madwin, G. 1999. Myths About Queer by Choice People [Online]. Available: http://www.queerbychoice.com/myths.html.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., et al. 2000. Navigation-Related Structural Change in the Hippocampi of Taxi Drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97: 4398–403.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A., Woollett, K. & Spiers, H. J. 2006. London Taxi Drivers and Bus Drivers: A Structural MRI and Neuropsychological Analysis. Hippocampus, 16: 1091–101.Google Scholar
Mahler, M. S., Furer, M. & Srttlage, S. F. 1959. Severe Emotiional Disturbances in Childhood: Psychosis. In: Arieti, S. (ed.) American Handbook of Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mahmoudzadeh, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Fournier, M., et al. 2013. Syllabic Discrimination in Premature Human Infants Prior to Complete Formation of Cortical Layers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110: 4846–51.Google Scholar
Mak, J. 2011. Security – Its in Our DNA [Online]. Oxygen Cloud. Available: http://blog.oxygencloud.com/2011/04/22/security-its-in-our-dna/ [Accessed March 22nd 2013].Google Scholar
Manuck, S. B., Flory, J. D., Ferrell, R. E., et al. 2000. A Regulatory Polymorphism of the Monoamine Oxidase-A Gene May Be Associated with Variability in Aggression, Impulsivity, and Central Nervous System Serotonergic Responsivity. Psychiatry Res, 95: 9–23.Google Scholar
Maoz, U., Mudrik, L., Rivlin, R., et al. 2015. On Reporting the Onset of the Intention to Move. In: Mele, A. R. (ed.) Surrounding Free Will. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mapmygene. Available: http://www.mapmygene.com/genetic.htm [Accessed 20th March 2013].Google Scholar
Marlow, H. 2009. Biblical Prophets and Contemporary Environmental Ethics: Re-Reading Amos, Hosea, and First Isaiah: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, C. 2016. Human Dignity in Christian Theological Perspective. In: Gestrich, A. & King, S. B. (eds.) Forthcoming. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. A. 2011. Gut Feelings: The Emerging Biology of Gut-Brain Communication. Nat Rev Neurosci, 12: 453–66.Google Scholar
Mays, J. L. 2006. The Self in the Psalms and the Image of God’ In: Soulen, R. K. & Woodhead, L. (eds.) God and Human DignityGrand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
McGowan, P. O., Suderman, M., Sasaki, A., et al. 2011. Broad Epigenetic Signature of Maternal Care in the Brain of Adult Rats. PLoS One, 6: e14739.Google Scholar
McGue, M., Vaupel, J. W., Holm, N., et al. 1993. Longevity Is Moderately Heritable in a Sample of Danish Twins Born 1870–1880. J Gerontol, 48: B237–44.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. 2012. Voles, Vasopressin, and Infidelity: A Molecular Basis for Monogamy, a Platform for Ethics, and More? Biol. Philos., 27: 521–543.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. & Elliott, K. C. 2012. Voles, Vasopressin, and the Ethics of Framing. Science, 338: 1285.Google Scholar
McMahon, E., Wintermark, P. & Lahav, A. 2012. Auditory Brain Development in Premature Infants: The Importance of Early Experience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252: 17–24.Google Scholar
Mead, M. 1928. Coming of Age in Samoa: A Psychological Study of Primitive Youth for Western Civilization,New York: Blue Ribbon Books.Google Scholar
Meaney, M. J. 2010. Epigenetics and the Biological Definition of Gene × Environment Interactions. Child Development, 81: 41–79.Google Scholar
Mehlman, P. T., Higley, J. D., Faucher, I., et al. 1995. Correlation of CSF 5-HIAA Concentration with Sociality and the Timing of Emigration in Free-Ranging Primates. Am J Psychiatry, 152: 907–13.Google Scholar
Mele, , A. R. 2009a. Causation, Action, and Free Will. In: Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. & Menzies, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 2009b. Effective Intentions – the Power of Conscious Will. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. 2010. Conscious Deciding and the Science of Free Will. In: Baumeister, R. F., Mele, A. R. & Vohs, K. D. (eds.) Free Will and Consciousness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. 2014. Free: Why Science Hasn’t Disproved Free-Will: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. 2015. Surrounding Free Will: Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merriman, T. & Cameron, V. 2007. Risk-Taking: Behind the Warrior Gene Story. N Z Med J, 120: U2440.Google Scholar
Mery, F., Belay, A. T., So, A. K. C., et al. 2007. Natural Polymorphism Affecting Learning and Memory in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104: 13051–13055.Google Scholar
Metzinger, T. 2000. Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions,Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meyer-Bahlburg, H. L., Dolezal, C., Baker, S., et al. 2008. Sexual Orientation in Women with Classical or Non-Classical Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia as a Function of Degree of Prenatal Androgen Excess. Arch. Sex. Behav., 37: 85–99.Google Scholar
Mick, E., Mcgough, J., Deutsch, C. K., et al. 2014. Genome-Wide Association Study of Proneness to Anger. PLoS One, 9: e87257.Google Scholar
Middleton, J. R. 2005. The Liberating Image: The Imago Dei in Genesis 1,Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 2004. Principles of Political Economy,Indianopolis: Hatchett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Millard, A. R. & Bordreuil, P. 1982. A Statue from Syria with Assyrian and Aramaic Inscriptions. The Biblical Archaeologist, 45: 135–141.Google Scholar
Miller, G., Zhu, G., Wright, M. J., et al. 2012. The Heritability and Genetic Correlates of Mobile Phone Use: A Twin Study of Consumer Behavior. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15: 97–106.Google Scholar
Mills, R. E., Bennett, E. A., Iskow, R. C., et al. 2007. Which Transposable Elements Are Active in the Human Genome? Trends Genet, 23: 183–91.Google Scholar
Minot, S., Bryson, A., Chehoud, C., et al. 2013. Rapid Evolution of the Human Gut Virome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110: 12450–5.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. S., Mazzeo, S. E., Bulik, C. M., et al. 2007. An Investigation of a Measure of Twins’ Equal Environments. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10: 840–847.Google Scholar
Mitman, G. 1992. The State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mock, S. E. & Eibach, R. P. 2012. Stability and Change in Sexual Orientation Identity over a 10-Year Period in Adulthood. Arch. Sex. Behav., 41: 641–648.Google Scholar
Mokili, J. L., Rohwer, F. & Dutilh, B. E. 2012. Metagenomics and Future Perspectives in Virus Discovery. Curr Opin Virol, 2: 63–77.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C., Smit, D. J., Boomsma, D. I., et al. 2012. Estimation of Subject-Specific Heritabilities from Intra-Individual Variation: iFACE. Twin Res Hum Genet, 15: 393–400.Google Scholar
Moller-Levet, C. S., Archer, S. N., Bucca, G., et al. 2013. Effects of Insufficient Sleep on Circadian Rhythmicity and Expression Amplitude of the Human Blood Transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110: E1132–41.Google Scholar
Moltmann, J. 1981. The Trinity and the Kingdom of God: The Doctrine of God: London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Monk, C., Georgieff, M. K. & Osterholm, E. A. 2013. Research Review: Maternal Prenatal Distress and Poor Nutrition – Mutually Influencing Risk Factors Affecting Infant Neurocognitive Development. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 54: 115–130.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S. 2008. Espousing Interactions and Fielding Reactions: Addressing Laypeople’s Beliefs About Genetic Determinism. Philosophical Psychology, 21: 331–348.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S. 2013a. Behavioural Genetics, Genetics and Epigenetics. In: Zelazo, P. D. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S. 2013b. Current Thinking About Nature and Nurture. In: Kampourakis, K. (ed.) The Philosophy of Biology. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Morell, V. 1993. Evidence Found for a Possible ‘Aggression Gene’. Science, 260: 1722–1723.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. D. 2003. Neuroethics: An Agenda for Neuroscience and Society. Nat Rev Neurosci, 4: 149–53.Google Scholar
Morrison, K. E., Rodgers, A. B., Morgan, C. P., et al. 2014. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Pubertal Brain Maturation. Neuroscience, 264: 17–24.Google Scholar
Morrone, M. C. 2010. Brain Development: Critical Periods for Cross-Sensory Plasticity. Curr Biol, 20: R934–6.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. 2011. Genetics and Criminal Responsibility. Trends Cogn. Sci., 15: 378–380.Google Scholar
Morsella, E. 2005. The Function of Phenomenal States: Supramodular Interaction Theory. Psychol Rev, 112: 1000–21.Google Scholar
Mueller, M., Martens, L. & Apweiler, R. 2007. Annotating the Human Proteome: Beyond Establishing a Parts List. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1774: 175–91.Google Scholar
Mulcaster, R. 1581. Positions Vvherin Those Primitiue Circumstances Be Examined, Which Are Necessarie for the Training Vp of Children, Either for Skill in Their Booke, or Health in Their Bodie. Written by Richard Mulcaster, Master of the Schoole Erected in London Anno. 1561. In the Parish of Sainct Laurence Povvntneie, by the Vvorshipfull Companie of the Merchaunt Tailers of the Said Citie. Printed at London: By Thomas Vautrollier for Thomas Chare [i.e. Chard].Google Scholar
Muller, G. B. 2007. Evo-Devo: Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis. Nat Rev Genet, 8: 943–9.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. 1936. Out of the Night: A Biologist’s View of the Future,London: V. Gollancz.Google Scholar
Müller-Wille, S. & Rheinberger, H.-J. 2012. A Cultural History of Heredity. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Muller-Wille, S., Rheinberger, H. J., Gayon, J., et al. 2008. Race and Genomics. Old Wine in New Bottles? Documents from a Transdisciplinary Discussion. NTM, 16: 363–386.Google Scholar
Munafo, M. R., Durrant, C., Lewis, G., et al. 2009. Gene X Environment Interactions at the Serotonin Transporter Locus. Biol Psychiatry, 65: 211–9.Google Scholar
Murdoch, S. 2007. IQ: A Smart History of a Failed Idea,Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Murphy, N. 1999. Supervenience and the Downward Efficacy of the Mental: A Nonreductive Physicalist Account of Human Action. In: Russell, R. J., Murphy, N., Meyering, T. C., et al. (eds.) Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. The Vatican Observatory and Center for Theology and Natural Science.Google Scholar
Murphy, N. 2006. Emergence and Mental Causation. In: Clayton, P. & Davies, P. (eds.) The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mustanski, B. S., Dupree, M. G., Nievergelt, C. M., et al. 2005. A Genomewide Scan of Male Sexual Orientation. Hum. Genet., 116: 272–278.Google Scholar
Nair, H. P. & Young, L. J. 2006. Vasopressin and Pair-Bond Formation: Genes to Brain to Behavior. Physiology (Bethesda), 21: 146–52.Google Scholar
Naumova, O. Y., Lee, M., Koposov, R., et al. 2012. Differential Patterns of Whole-Genome DNA Methylation in Institutionalized Children and Children Raised by Their Biological Parents. Dev Psychopathol, 24: 143–55.Google Scholar
Needham, J. & Wang, L. 1956. Science and Civilisation in China. Vol. 2, History of Scientific Thought: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. A., Fox, N. A. & Zeanah, C. H. 2013. Anguish of the Abandoned Child. Sci Am, 308: 62–7.Google Scholar
Neyer, F. J. 2002. Twin Relationships in Old Age: A Developmental Perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19: 155–177.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, R. 1945. The Nature and Destiny of Man. A Christian Interpretation ... Gifford Lectures,New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Nikkels, P. G., Hack, K. E. & Van Gemert, M. J. 2008. Pathology of Twin Placentas with Special Attention to Monochorionic Twin Placentas. J Clin Pathol, 61: 1247–53.Google Scholar
Niu, W. & Brass, J. 2011. Intelligence in Worldwide Perspective. In: Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. & Coakley, S. 2013. Evolution, Games, and God: The Principle of Cooperation,Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. 2000. Persons and Causes – the Metaphysics of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press,.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. 2015. The Emergence of Personhood: Reflections on the Game of Life. In: Jeeves, M. (ed.) The Emergence of Personhood – a Quantum Leap? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. G., Heron, J., Golding, J., et al. 2003. Maternal Antenatal Anxiety and Behavioural/Emotional Problems in Children: A Test of a Programming Hypothesis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 44: 1025–1036.Google Scholar
O’Leary, D. D., Chou, S. J. & Sahara, S. 2007. Area Patterning of the Mammalian Cortex. Neuron, 56: 252–69.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2009. Causation in Biology. In: Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. & Menzies, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olazabal, D. E. & Young, L. J. 2006. Oxytocin Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens Facilitate “Spontaneous” Maternal Behavior in Adult Female Prairie Voles. Neuroscience, 141: 559–68.Google Scholar
Olby, R. 2013. Darwin and Heredity. In: Ruse, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ollikainen, M., Smith, K. R., Joo, E. J., et al. 2010. DNA Methylation Analysis of Multiple Tissues from Newborn Twins Reveals Both Genetic and Intrauterine Components to Variation in the Human Neonatal Epigenome. Hum Mol Genet, 19: 4176–88.Google Scholar
Ophir, A. G., Wolff, J. O. & Phelps, S. M. 2008. Variation in Neural V1aR Predicts Sexual Fidelity and Space Use among Male Prairie Voles in Semi-Natural Settings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 105: 1249–1254.Google Scholar
Osborne, K. A., Robichon, A., Burgess, E., et al. 1997. Natural Behavior Polymorphism Due to a cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase of Drosophila. Science, 277: 834–836.Google Scholar
Ott, M., Corliss, H., Wypij, D., et al. 2011. Stability and Change in Self-Reported Sexual Orientation Identity in Young People: Application of Mobility Metrics. Arch. Sex. Behav., 40: 519–532.Google Scholar
Owen, R. & Sloan, P. R. 1992. The Hunterian Lectures in Comparative Anatomy, May and June 1837,University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. 2000. Causal Democracy and Causal Contributions in Developmental Systems. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings), 67: S332–347.Google Scholar
Painter, R. C., Osmond, C., Gluckman, P., et al. 2008. Transgenerational Effects of Prenatal Exposure to the Dutch Famine on Neonatal Adiposity and Health in Later Life. BJOG, 115: 1243–9.Google Scholar
Painter, R. C., Roseboom, T. J. & De Rooij, S. R. 2012. Long-Term Effects of Prenatal Stress and Glucocorticoid Exposure. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews, 96: 315–324.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, W. 1970. What Is Man?: Contemporary Anthropology in Theological Perspective,Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Panofsky, A. 2014. Misbehaving Science: Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Partridge, T. 2011. Methodological Advances toward a Dynamic Developmental Behavioral Genetics: Bridging the Gap. Research in Human Development, 8: 242–257.Google Scholar
Pascalis, O., De Vivies, X. D., Anzures, G., et al. 2011. Development of Face Processing. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci, 2: 666–675.Google Scholar
Paul, D. B. 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present,Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Paul, D. B. 1998. The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine and the Nature-Nurture Debate: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pavlov, K. A., Chistiakov, D. A. & Chekhonin, V. P. 2012. Genetic Determinants of Aggression and Impulsivity in Humans. Journal of Applied Genetics, 53: 61–82.Google Scholar
Peacocke, A. 2006. Emergence, Mind, and Divine Action: The Hierarchy of the Sciences in Relation to the Human Mind-Brain-Body. In: Clayton, P. & Davies, P. (eds.) The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., Mcclearn, G. E., et al. 1988. Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Related Traits in Adult Twins Reared Apart and Reared Together. J Pers Soc Psychol, 55: 950–7.Google Scholar
Pembrey, M. E., Bygren, L. O., Kaati, G., et al. 2006. Sex-Specific, Male-Line Transgenerational Responses in Humans. Eur J Hum Genet, 14: 159–66.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., Mcgrath, L. M., Rosenberg, J., et al. 2009. Gene X Environment Interactions in Reading Disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Dev Psychol, 45: 77–89.Google Scholar
Perbal, L. 2013. The ‘Warrior Gene’ and the Maori People: The Responsibility of the Geneticists. Bioethics, 27: 382–387.Google Scholar
Petronis, A. 2010. Epigenetics as a Unifying Principle in the Aetiology of Complex Traits and Diseases. Nature, 465: 721–7.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. H. 1935. State Letters of Assyria [No 345],New Haven American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Phelps, S. M. 2010. From Endophenotypes to Evolution: Social Attachment, Sexual Fidelity and the Avpr1a Locus. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20: 795–802.Google Scholar
Philibert, R. A., Beach, S. R., Lei, M. K., et al. 2013. Changes in DNA Methylation at the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Repressor May Be a New Biomarker for Smoking. Clin Epigenetics, 5: 19.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. A. 1846. Scrofula; Its Nature, Its Causes, Its Prevalence and the Principles of Treatment. Journal of the Statistical Society of London. 9:152–157.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature: New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Piton, A., Poquet, H., Redin, C., et al. 2014. 20 Ans Apres: A Second Mutation in MAOA Identified by Targeted High-Throughput Sequencing in a Family with Altered Behavior and Cognition. Eur J Hum Genet, 22: 776–83.Google Scholar
Pitt, B. 2012. ‘I Want Her Approval. Angie Is a Force ... I Want Her to Be Proud of Her Man’: Brad Pitt on Guns, Violence and That Wedding[Online]. Available: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-2199295/Brad-Pitt-talks-Angelina-Jolie-I-want-approval-Angie-force–I-want-proud-man.html [Accessed March 22nd 2013].Google Scholar
Plomin, R. 2011. Commentary: Why Are Children in the Same Family So Different? Non-Shared Environment Three Decades Later. Int J Epidemiol, 40: 582–92.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. & Bergeman, C. S. 1991. The Nature of Nurture: Genetic Influences on “Environmental” Measures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14: 373–427.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Coon, H., Carey, G., et al. 1991. Parent-Offspring and Sibling Adoption Analyses of Parental Ratings of Temperament in Infancy and Childhood. J Pers, 59: 705–32.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. & Deary, I. J. 2015. Genetics and Intelligence Differences: Five Special Findings. Mol Psychiatry, 20: 98–108.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Defries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., et al. 2013a. Behavioral Genetics: A Primer, Duffield: Worth Publishers, 6th Edition.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Defries, J. C., Mcclearn, G. E., et al. 2008. Behavioral Genetics: Duffield: Worth, 5th edition.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Haworth, C. M., Meaburn, E. L., et al. 2013b. Common DNA Markers Can Account for More Than Half of the Genetic Influence on Cognitive Abilities. Psychol Sci, 24: 562–8.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. & Simpson, M. A. 2013. The Future of Genomics for Developmentalists. Dev Psychopathol, 25: 1263–78.Google Scholar
Poelmans, G., Franke, B., Pauls, D. L., et al. 2013. AKAPs Integrate Genetic Findings for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Transl Psychiatry, 3: e270.Google Scholar
Polderman, T. J., Benyamin, B., De Leeuw, C. A., et al. 2015. Meta-Analysis of the Heritability of Human Traits Based on Fifty Years of Twin Studies. Nat Genet, 47: 702–9.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A. & Farah, M. J. 2015. Progress and Challenges in Probing the Human Brain. Nature, 526: 371–9.Google Scholar
Pollock, S. 1999. Ancient Mesopotamia: The Eden That Never Was: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ponseti, J., Siebner, H. R., KlöPpel, S., et al. 2007. Homosexual Women Have Less Grey Matter in Perirhinal Cortex Than Heterosexual Women. Plos One, 2: e762.Google Scholar
Posner, S. F., Baker, L., Heath, A., et al. 1996. Social Contact, Social Attitudes, and Twin Similarity. Behav Genet, 26: 123–33.Google Scholar
Power, R. A. & Pluess, M. 2015. Heritability Estimates of the Big Five Personality Traits Based on Common Genetic Variants. Transl Psychiatry, 5: e604.Google Scholar
Prichard, Z., Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., et al. 2008. No Evidence for Interaction between MAOA and Childhood Adversity for Antisocial Behavior. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 147B: 228–32.Google Scholar
Proctor, R. 1988. Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis,Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, S. M., Moran, J. L., Fromer, M., et al. 2014. A Polygenic Burden of Rare Disruptive Mutations in Schizophrenia. Nature, 506: 185–90.Google Scholar
Rachels, J. 1990. Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, E. J., Ito, M., Shi, H., et al. 2014. In Utero Effects. In Utero Undernourishment Perturbs the Adult Sperm Methylome and Intergenerational Metabolism. Science, 345: 1255903.Google Scholar
Rahm, A. K., Feigelson, H. S., Wagner, N., et al. 2012. Perception of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Genetic Tests among Members of a Large Managed Care Organization. J. Genet. Couns., 21: 448–461.Google Scholar
Rajasethupathy, P., Sankaran, S., Marshel, J. H., et al. 2015. Projections from Neocortex Mediate Top-Down Control of Memory Retrieval. Nature, 526: 653–9.Google Scholar
Ramagopalan, S. V., Dyment, D. A., Handunnetthi, L., et al. 2010. A Genome-Wide Scan of Male Sexual Orientation. J Hum Genet, 55: 131–2.Google Scholar
Ramsey, E. M., Achter, P. J. & Condit, C. M. 2001. Genetics, Race, and Crime: An Audience Study Exploring the Bell Curve and Book Reviews. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18: 1–22.Google Scholar
Rankin, C. H. 2002. From Gene to Identified Neuron to Behaviour in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Nat. Rev. Genet., 3: 622–630.Google Scholar
Ratman, D., Vanden Berghe, W., Dejager, L., et al. 2013. How Glucocorticoid Receptors Modulate the Activity of Other Transcription Factors: A Scope Beyond Tethering. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 380: 41–54.Google Scholar
Reardon, S. 2015. Global Summit Reveals Divergent Views on Human Gene Editing. Nature, 528: 173.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. C., Andersen, E. C., Kruglyak, L., et al. 2009. A Polymorphism in Npr-1 Is a Behavioral Determinant of Pathogen Susceptibility in C. Elegans. Science, 323: 382–4.Google Scholar
Remy, J. J. 2010. Stable Inheritance of an Acquired Behavior in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Curr Biol, 20: R877–8.Google Scholar
Remy, J. J. & Hobert, O. 2005. An Interneuronal Chemoreceptor Required for Olfactory Imprinting in C. Elegans. Science, 309: 787–90.Google Scholar
Reyes, A., Haynes, M., Hanson, N., et al. 2010. Viruses in the Faecal Microbiota of Monozygotic Twins and Their Mothers. Nature, 466: 334–8.Google Scholar
Rice, F., Harold, G. T., Boivin, J., et al. 2010. The Links between Prenatal Stress and Offspring Development and Psychopathology: Disentangling Environmental and Inherited Influences. Psychol. Med., 40: 335–345.Google Scholar
Rice, F., Jones, I. & Thapar, A. 2007. The Impact of Gestational Stress and Prenatal Growth on Emotional Problems in Offspring: A Review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 115: 171–183.Google Scholar
Rice, G., Anderson, C., Risch, N., et al. 1999. Male Homosexuality: Absence of Linkage to Microsatellite Markers at Xq28. Science, 284: 665–667.Google Scholar
Richardson, K. & Norgate, S. 2005. The Equal Environments Assumption of Classical Twin Studies May Not Hold. Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 75: 339–350.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. S., Daniels, C. R., Gillman, M. W., et al. 2014. Society: Don’t Blame the Mothers. Nature, 512: 131–2.Google Scholar
Richmond, R. C., Simpkin, A. J., Woodward, G., et al. 2015. Prenatal Exposure to Maternal Smoking and Offspring DNA Methylation across the Lifecourse: Findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Hum Mol Genet, 24: 2201–17.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 2003. Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human, London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. W., Gygax, L., et al. 2010. Dissecting ‘Gaydar’: Accuracy and the Role of Masculinity-Femininity. Arch. Sex. Behav., 39: 124–140.Google Scholar
Rietveld, C. A., Medland, S. E., Derringer, J., et al. 2013. GWAS of 126,559 Individuals Identifies Genetic Variants Associated with Educational Attainment. Science, 340: 1467–1471.Google Scholar
Rietveld, M. J., Van Der Valk, J. C., Bongers, I. L., et al. 2000. Zygosity Diagnosis in Young Twins by Parental Report. Twin Research, 3: 134–41.Google Scholar
Rigoni, D., Kuhn, S., Gaudino, G., et al. 2012. Reducing Self-Control by Weakening Belief in Free Will. Conscious Cogn, 21: 1482–90.Google Scholar
Rigoni, D., KüHn, S., Giuseppe, S., et al. 2011. Inducing Disbelief in Free Will Alters Brain Correlates of Preconscious Motor Preparation: The Brain Minds Whether We Believe in Free Will or Not. Psychol. Sci., 22: 613–618.Google Scholar
Rijsdijk, F. H. V. & Sham, P. C. 2002. Analytic Approaches to Twin Data Using Structural Equation Models. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 3: 119–133.Google Scholar
Risch, N., Herrell, R., Lehner, T., et al. 2009. Interaction between the Serotonin Transporter Gene (5-HTTLPR), Stressful Life Events, and Risk of Depression: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA, 301: 2462–71.Google Scholar
Roe, S. 2010. Biology, Atheism, and Politics in Eighteenth-Century France. In: Alexander, D. R. & Numbers, R. L. (eds.) Biology and Ideology – from Descartes to Dawkins. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, C., Reale, V., Kim, K., et al. 2003. Inhibition of Caenorhabditis Elegans Social Feeding by FMRFamide-Related Peptide Activation of NPR-1. Nat. Neurosci., 6: 1178–1185.Google Scholar
Rose, R. J., Kaprio, J., Williams, C. J., et al. 1990. Social Contact and Sibling Similarity: Facts, Issues, and Red Herrings. Behav Genet, 20: 763–78.Google Scholar
Rose, S. P. R., Kamin, L. J. & Lewontin, R. C. 1984. Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature,Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, K. & Wang, A. 2006. The Scarlet Gene: Behavioral Genetics, Criminal Law, and Racial and Ethnic Stigma. Law and Contemporary Problems, 69: 343–365.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neale, M. C., et al. 1986. Altruism and Aggression: The Heritability of Individual Differences. J Pers Soc Psychol, 50: 1192–8.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1913. On the Notion of Cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
Rutherford, A. 2004. ‘A Visible Scientist’: BF Skinner’s Writings for the Popular Press. European Journal of Behaviour Analysis, 5: 109–120.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. 2006. Genes and Behavior: Nature-Nurture Interplay Explained,Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sammut, M., Cook, S. J., Nguyen, K. C., et al. 2015. Glia-Derived Neurons Are Required for Sex-Specific Learning in C. Elegans. Nature, 526: 385–90.Google Scholar
Sanders, A. R., Martin, E. R., Beecham, G. W., et al. 2015. Genome-Wide Scan Demonstrates Significant Linkage for Male Sexual Orientation. Psychol. Med., 45: 1379–1388.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Pellegrini, S. & Mechelli, A. 2011. Forensic Neurosciences: From Basic Research to Applications and Pitfalls. Current Opinion in Neurology, 24: 371–377.Google Scholar
Saudino, K. J., Mcguire, S., Reiss, D., et al. 1995. Parent Ratings of EAS Temperaments in Twins, Full Siblings, Half Siblings, and Step Siblings. J Pers Soc Psychol, 68: 723–33.Google Scholar
Saudino, K. J., Wertz, A. E., Gagne, J. R., et al. 2004. Night and Day: Are Siblings as Different in Temperament as Parents Say They Are? J Pers Soc Psychol, 87: 698–706.Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. C. 2006. Who’s Gay? Does It Matter? Curr. Dir. Psychol., 15: 40–44.Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. C. 2009. How Many Gays Are There? It Depends – Contemporary Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities. In: Hope, D. A. (ed.). New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Savulescu, J., Hemsley, M., Newson, A., et al. 2006. Behavioural Genetics: Why Eugenic Selection Is Preferable to Enhancement. J Appl Philos, 23: 157–71.Google Scholar
Scarr, S. 1966. Genetic Factors in Activity Motivation. Child Development, 37: 663–673.Google Scholar
Scarr, S. & Weinberg, R. A. 1976. IQ Test Performance of Black Children Adopted by White Families. Am. Psychol.: 726–739.Google Scholar
Schafer, W. R. 2005. Deciphering the Neural and Molecular Mechanisms of C-Elegans Behavior. Curr Biol, 15: R723-R729.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. 1998. Genes, Behavior, and Developmental Emergentism: One Process, Indivisible? Philosophy of Science, 65: 209–252.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. 2000. Behavior at the Organismal and Molecular Levels: The Case of C. Elegans. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers: S273-S288.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. 2006. Behaviour: Its Nature and Nurture. In: Parens, E., Chapman, A. R. & Press, N. (eds.) Wrestling with Behavioral Genetics: Science, Ethics, and Public Conversation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiner, R., Sokolowski, M. B. & Erber, J. 2004. Activity of cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase (PKG) Affects Sucrose Responsiveness and Habituation in Drosophila Melanogaster. Learn. Mem., 11: 303–311.Google Scholar
Schiff, M., Duyme, M., Dumaret, A., et al. 1982. How Much Could We Boost Scholastic Achievement and IQ Scores? A Direct Answer from a French Adoption Study. Cognition, 12: 165–96.Google Scholar
Schiff, M. & Lewontin, R. C. 1986. Education and Class: The Irrelevance of IQ Genetic Studies,Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Schlegel, A., Alexander, P., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., et al. 2015. Hypnotizing Libet: Readiness Potentials with Non-Conscious Volition. Conscious Cogn, 33: 196–203.Google Scholar
Schloissnig, S., Arumugam, M., Sunagawa, S., et al. 2013. Genomic Variation Landscape of the Human Gut Microbiome. Nature, 493: 45–50.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. H. 1983. The Faith of the Old Testament: A History. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schmitz, S. 1994. Personality and Temperament. In: Defries, J. C., Plomin, R. & Fulker, D. W. (eds.) Nature and Nurture During Middle Childhood. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schubeler, D. 2015. Function and Information Content of DNA Methylation. Nature, 517: 321–6.Google Scholar
Schuurmans, C. & Kurrasch, D. M. 2013. Neurodevelopmental Consequences of Maternal Distress: What Do We Really Know? Clin. Genet., 83: 108–117.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., Kim, R. M., Kolundzija, A. B., et al. 2010. Biodemographic and Physical Correlates of Sexual Orientation in Men. Arch. Sex. Behav., 39: 93–109.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 2007. Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power,New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 2010. Consciousness and the Problem of Free Will. In: Baumeister, R. F., Mele, A. R. & Vohs, K. D. (eds.) Free Will and Consciiousness – How Might They Work?: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, N. L. 2012. Born Together – Reared Apart: The Landmark Minnesota Twin Study. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U. C. O. 2000. Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociology Debate and Beyond: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sekar, A., Bialas, A. R., De Rivera, H., et al. 2016. Schizophrenia Risk from Complex Variation of Complement Component 4. Nature, 530: 177–83.Google Scholar
Selden, S. 1989. The Use of Biology to Legitimate Inequality: The Eugenics Movement within the High School Biology Txtbook, 1914–1949. In: Secada, W. (ed.) Equity in Education. New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Sender, R., Fuchs, S. & Milo, R. 2016. Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body. bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jan. 6, 2016; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/036103.Google Scholar
Sesardic, N. 2005. Making Sense of Heritability: How Not to Think About Behavior Genetics: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. A. 2013. How Life Changes Itself: The Read-Write Genome. Phys Life Rev, 10: 287–323.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J. P., Pfeffer, C. A., Jayaratne, T. E., et al. 2007. Beliefs About the Etiology of Homosexuality and About the Ramifications of Discovering Its Possible Genetic Origin. Journal of Homosexuality, 52: 111–150.Google Scholar
Sheridan, M. A., Fox, N. A., Zeanah, C. H., et al. 2012. Variation in Neural Development as a Result of Exposure to Institutionalization Early in Childhood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109: 12927–32.Google Scholar
Sherman, G. D., Lee, J. J., Cuddy, A. J., et al. 2012. Leadership Is Associated with Lower Levels of Stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109: 17903–7.Google Scholar
Shields, S. 2012. Aristotle. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Shumay, E., Logan, J., Volkow, N. D., et al. 2012. Evidence That the Methylation State of the Monoamine Oxidase A Gene Predicts Brain Activity of MAO A Enzyme in Healthy Men. Epigenetics, 7: 1151–1160.Google Scholar
Shur, N. 2009. The Genetics of Twinning: From Splitting Eggs to Breaking Paradigms Introduction. Am. J. Med. Genet., 151C: 105–109.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siegelman, M. 1974. Parental Background of Male Homosexuals and Heterosexuals. Arch. Sex. Behav., 3: 3–18.Google Scholar
Siegelman, M. 1981. Parental Backgrounds of Homosexual and Heterosexual Men: A Cross National Replication. Arch. Sex. Behav., 10: 505–513.Google Scholar
Siklenka, K., Erkek, S., Godmann, M., et al. 2015. Disruption of Histone Methylation in Developing Sperm Impairs Offspring Health Transgenerationally. Science, 350: aab2006.Google Scholar
Silberstein, M. & Mcgeever, J. 1999. The Search for Ontological Emergence. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 182–200.Google Scholar
Simicevic, J., Schmid, A. W., Gilardoni, P. A., et al. 2013. Absolute Quantification of Transcription Factors During Cellular Differentiation Using Multiplexed Targeted Proteomics. Nat Methods, 10: 570–6.Google Scholar
Simonson, I. & Sela, A. 2011. On the Heritability of Consumer Decision Making: An Exploratory Approach for Studying Genetic Effects on Judgment and Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 37: 951–966.Google Scholar
Singer, T., Mcconnell, M. J., Marchetto, M. C., et al. 2010. Line-1 Retrotransposons: Mediators of Somatic Variation in Neuronal Genomes? Trends Neurosci, 33: 345–54.Google Scholar
Smemo, S., Tena, J. J., Kim, K. H., et al. 2014. Obesity-Associated Variants within FTO Form Long-Range Functional Connections with IRX3. Nature, 507: 371–5.Google Scholar
Smerecnik, C. M., Mesters, I., De Vries, N. K., et al. 2009. Alerting the General Population to Genetic Risks: The Value of Health Messages Communicating the Existence of Genetic Risk Factors for Public Health Promotion. Health Psychol, 28: 734–45.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Skinner, A. S. 1982. The Wealth of Nations. Books I-Iii,Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Snyderman, M. & Rothman, S. 1988. The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy, Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, M. B. 1980. Foraging Strategies of Drosophila Melanogaster – a Chromosomal Analysis. Behav. Genet., 10: 291–302.Google Scholar
Solomon, N. G., Richmond, A. R., Harding, P. A., et al. 2009. Polymorphism at the Avpr1a Locus in Male Prairie Voles Correlated with Genetic but Not Social Monogamy in Field Populations. Mol. Ecol., 18: 4680–4695.Google Scholar
Spalding, K. L., Bergmann, O., Alkass, K., et al. 2013. Dynamics of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Humans. Cell, 153: 1219–27.Google Scholar
Sparkman, A. M., Adams, J. R., Steury, T. D., et al. 2012. Evidence for a Genetic Basis for Delayed Dispersal in a Cooperatively Breeding Canid. Animal Behaviour, 83: 1091–1098.Google Scholar
Spector, T. D. 2012. Identically Different: Why You Can Change Your Genes,London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Spitz, F. & Furlong, E. E. 2008. Transcription Factors: From Enhancer Binding to Developmental Control. Nat Rev Genet, 13: 613–26.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. & Aronson, J. 1995. Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 69: 797–811.Google Scholar
Steensma, T. D., Van Der Ende, J., Verhulst, F. C., et al. 2013. Gender Variance in Childhood and Sexual Orientation in Adulthood: A Prospective Study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10: 2723–2733.Google Scholar
Stillman, T. F. & Baumeister, R. F. 2010. Guilty, Free, and Wise: Determinism and Psychopathy Diminish Learning from Negative Emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46: 951–960.Google Scholar
Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F. & Mele, A. R. 2011. Free Will in Everyday Life: Autobiographical Accounts of Free and Unfree Actions. Philosophical Psychology, 24: 381–394.Google Scholar
Stochholm, K., Bojesen, A., Jensen, A. S., et al. 2012. Criminality in Men with Klinefelter’s Syndrome and XYY Syndrome: A Cohort Study. BMJ Open, e000650 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000650.Google Scholar
Streatfeild, C. A., Mabry, K. E., Keane, B., et al. 2011. Intraspecific Variability in the Social and Genetic Mating Systems of Prairie Voles, Microtus Ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour, 82: 1387–1398.Google Scholar
Sturgis, P., Read, S., Hatemi, P., et al. 2010. A Genetic Basis for Social Trust? Political Behavior, 32: 205–230.Google Scholar
Sudjic, D. 2012. The Urban DNA of London[Online]. Available: http://www.domusweb.it/en/op-ed/the-urban-dna-of-london/ [Accessed March 22nd 2013].Google Scholar
Sugita, Y. 2008. Face Perception in Monkeys Reared with No Exposure to Faces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105: 394–8.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. 1963. The Image of God: The Doctrine of St.Augustine and Its Influence, Dubuque, Iowa: Priory Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. F., Kendler, K. S. & Neale, M. C. 2003. Schizophrenia as a Complex Trait: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis of Twin Studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 60: 1187–92.Google Scholar
Swaab, D. F. & Hofman, M. A. 1990. An Enlarged Suprachiasmatic Nucleus in Homosexual Men. Brain Research, 537: 141–148.Google Scholar
Szyf, M. 2015. Nongenetic Inheritance and Transgenerational Epigenetics. Trends Mol Med, 21: 134–44.Google Scholar
Tabery, J. 2014. Beyond Versus – the Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and NurtureCambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talge, N. M., Neal, C., Glover, V., et al. 2007. Antenatal Maternal Stress and Long-Term Effects on Child Neurodevelopment: How and Why? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 48: 245–261.Google Scholar
Tan, E. J. & Tang, B. L. 2006. Looking for Food: Molecular Neuroethology of Invertebrate Feeding Behavior. Ethology, 112: 826–832.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. & Kim-Cohen, J. 2007. Meta-Analysis of Gene-Environment Interactions in Developmental Psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol, 19: 1029–37.Google Scholar
Teh, A. L., Pan, H., Chen, L., et al. 2014. The Effect of Genotype and in Utero Environment on Interindividual Variation in Neonate DNA Methylomes. Genome Res, 24: 1064–74.Google Scholar
Teigen, K. H. 1984. A Note on the Origin of the Term Nature and Nurture – Not Shakespeare and Galton, but Mulcaster. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 20: 363–364.Google Scholar
Thaiss, C. A., Zeevi, D., Levy, M., et al. 2015. Transkingdom Control of Microbiota Diurnal Oscillations Promotes Metabolic Homeostasis. Cell, 159: 514–29.Google Scholar
Thiselton, A. 2015. The Image and Likeness of God. In: Jeeves, M. (ed.) The Emergence of Personhood – a Quantum Leap? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. H. 2008. Genome Evolution in Caenorhabditis. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, 7: 211–6.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Palmer, C. T. 2000. A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tiihonen, J., Rautiainen, M. R., Ollila, H. M., et al. 2015. Genetic Background of Extreme Violent Behavior. Mol Psychiatry, 20: 786–92.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. 1989. The Innate Versus the Manifest: How Universal Does Universal Have to Be?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12: 36–37.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 1990. On the Universality of Human Nature and the Uniqueness of the Individual: The Role of Genetics and Adaptation. J Pers, 58: 17–67.Google Scholar
Trefilov, A., Berard, J., Krawczak, M., et al. 2000. Natal Dispersal in Rhesus Macaques Is Related to Serotonin Transporter Gene Promoter Variation. Behav. Genet., 30: 295–301.Google Scholar
Trevena, J. & Miller, J. 2010. Brain Preparation before a Voluntary Action: Evidence against Unconscious Movement Initiation. Conscious Cogn, 19: 447–56.Google Scholar
Truett, K. R., Eaves, L. J., Meyer, J. M., et al. 1992. Religion and Education as Mediators of Attitudes – a Multivariate Analysis. Behav. Genet., 22: 43–62.Google Scholar
Tse, P. 2013. The Neural Basis of Free Will: Criterial Causation,Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tsuang, M. T., Williams, W. M., Simpson, J. C., et al. 2002. Pilot Study of Spirituality and Mental Health in Twins. Am. J. Psychiat., 159: 486–488.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. 2000. Three Laws of Behavior Genetics and What They Mean. Curr. Dir. Psychol., 9: 160–164.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., et al. 2003. Socioeconomic Status Modifies Heritability of IQ in Young Children. Psychol Sci, 14: 623–8.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. & Harden, K. P. 2014. Behavior Genetic Research Methods. In: Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (eds.) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Second edition.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., Pettersson, E. & Horn, E. E. 2014. A Phenotypic Null Hypothesis for the Genetics of Personality. Annu Rev Psychol, 65: 515–40.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. & Waldron, M. 2000. Nonshared Environment: A Theoretical, Methodological, and Quantitative Review. Psychol Bull, 126: 78–108.Google Scholar
Ulbricht, R. J. & Emeson, R. B. 2014. One Hundred Million Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing Sites: Hearing through the Noise. Bioessays, 36: 730–5.Google Scholar
Urbina, S. 2011. Tests of Intelligence. In: Sternberg, R. & Kaufman, S. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. & Brown, M. 2005. Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement. American Politics Research, 33: 868–894.Google Scholar
Van Den Bergh, B. R. H. & Marcoen, A. 2004. High Antenatal Maternal Anxiety Is Related to Adhd Symptoms, Externalizing Problems, and Anxiety in 8- and 9-Year-Olds. Child Development, 75: 1085–1097.Google Scholar
Van Den Bergh, B. R. H., Mulder, E. J. H., Mennes, M., et al. 2005. Antenatal Maternal Anxiety and Stress and the Neurobehavioural Development of the Fetus and Child: Links and Possible Mechanisms. A Review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29: 237–258.Google Scholar
Van Dongen, J., Slagboom, P. E., Draisma, H. H. M., et al. 2012. The Continuing Value of Twin Studies in the Omics Era. Nature reviews. Genetics, 13: 640–53.Google Scholar
Van Huyssteen, J. W. 2006. Alone in the World?: Human Uniqueness in Science and TheologyGrand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Belsky, J. & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. 2012. Serotonin Transporter Genotype 5HTTLPR as a Marker of Differential Susceptibility? A Meta-Analysis of Child and Adolescent Gene-by-Environment Studies. Transl Psychiatry, 2: e147.Google Scholar
Van Praag, H. 2008. Neurogenesis and Exercise: Past and Future Directions. Neuromolecular Med, 10: 128–40.Google Scholar
Vance, T., Maes, H. H. & Kendler, K. S. 2010. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Multiple Dimensions of Religiosity a Twin Study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198: 755–761.Google Scholar
Vanderlaan, D. P., Forrester, D. L., Petterson, L. J., et al. 2013. The Prevalence of Fa’afafine Relatives among Samoan Gynephilic Men and Fa’afafine. Arch. Sex. Behav., 42: 353–359.Google Scholar
Vassos, E., Collier, D. A. & Fazel, S. 2014. Systematic Meta-Analyses and Field Synopsis of Genetic Association Studies of Violence and Aggression. Mol Psychiatry. 19: 471–477.Google Scholar
Veenendaal, M. V., Painter, R. C., De Rooij, S. R., et al. 2013. Transgenerational Effects of Prenatal Exposure to the 1944–45 Dutch Famine. BJOG, 120: 548–53.Google Scholar
Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J. & Hatemi, P. K. 2012. Correlation Not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies. Am J Pol Sci, 56: 34–51.Google Scholar
Virgin, H. W. 2014. The Virome in Mammalian Physiology and Disease. Cell, 157: 142–50.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G. & Wray, N. R. 2008. Heritability in the Genomics Era – Concepts and Misconceptions. Nat. Rev. Genet., 9: 255–266.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Medland, S. E., Ferreira, M. A., et al. 2006. Assumption-Free Estimation of Heritability from Genome-Wide Identity-by-Descent Sharing between Full Siblings. PLoS Genet, 2: e41.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D. & Schooler, J. W. 2008. The Value of Believing in Free Will: Encouraging a Belief in Determinism Increases Cheating. Psychol. Sci., 19: 49–54.Google Scholar
Voland, E. 2009. Evaluating the Evolutionary Status of Religiosity and Religiousness. In: Voland, E. S., W (ed.) The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior. Springer.Google Scholar
Vonasch, A. J. & Baumeister, R. F. 2013. Implications of Free Will Beliefs for Basic Theory and Societal Benefit: Critique and Implications for Social Psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52: 219–227.Google Scholar
Wade, N. J. 2014. A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race, and Human History,New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 2010. The Image of God: Rights, Reason, and Order. University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, Paper 246.Google Scholar
Walker, B. 2013. When the Facts and the Law Are against You, Argue the Genes?: A Pragmatic Analysis of Genotyping Mitigation Defenses for Psychopathic Defendants in Death Penalty Cases. Washington University Law Review, 90: 1779–1817.Google Scholar
Wall, S. 2009. The Nurture of Nature: Childhood, Antimodernism, and Ontario Summer Camps, 1920–55,Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Waller, J. 2001. Ideas of Heredity, Reproduction and Eugenics in Britain, 1800–1875. Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. & Biomed. Sci., 32: 457–489.Google Scholar
Waller, N. G., Kojetin, B. A., Bouchard, T. J., et al. 1990. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Religious Interests, Attitudes, and Values – a Study of Twins Reared Apart and Together. Psychol. Sci., 1: 138–142.Google Scholar
Walton, J. H. 2009. The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate,Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
Wang, B., Zhou, S., Hong, F., et al. 2012. Association Analysis between the Tag SNP for Sonic Hedgehog Rs9333613 Polymorphism and Male Sexual Orientation. Journal of Andrology, 33: 951–954.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Duclot, F., Liu, Y., et al. 2013. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Facilitate Partner Preference Formation in Female Prairie Voles. Nat Neurosci, 16: 919–24.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Liu, Q., Shen, H., et al. 2015. Large-Scale Functional Brain Network Changes in Taxi Drivers: Evidence from Resting-State fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp, 36: 862–71.Google Scholar
Wang, X. & He, C. 2014. Dynamic RNA Modifications in Posttranscriptional Regulation. Mol Cell, 56: 5–12.Google Scholar
Warner, J. H. 1997. The Therapeutic Perspective: Medical Practice, Knowledge, and Identity in America, 1820–1885,Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wasserman, D. 2004. Is There Value in Identifying Individual Genetic Predispositions to Violence? J Law Med Ethics, 32: 24–33.Google Scholar
Watrin, J. P. & Darwich, R. 2012. On Behaviorism in the Cognitive Revolution: Myth and Reactions. Rev. Gen. Psychol., 16: 269–282.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. 1953. Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids; a Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature, 171: 737–8.Google Scholar
Weindling, P. 2010. Genetics, Eugenics, and the Holocaust. In: Alexander, D. R. & Numbers, R. L. Biology and Ideology – from Descartes to Dawkins. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weingart, P., Maasen, S., Segerstrale, U. 1997. Shifting Boundaries between the Biological and the Social: The Social and Political Contexts. In: Weingart, P., Mitchell, S.D., Richerson, P.J. and Maasen, S (ed.) Human by Nature: Between Biology and the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Weinstock, M. 2008. The Long-Term Behavioural Consequences of Prenatal Stress. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32: 1073–1086.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, J. N. 2006. Intelligence, Destiny, and Education: The Ideological Roots of Intelligence Testing,London: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, L. J. 1967. The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science, 155: 1203–1207.Google Scholar
Whiteway, E. & Alexander, D. R. 2015. Understanding the Causes of Same Sex Attraction. Science and Christian Belief, 27: 17–40.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, M., Schlegl, J., Hahne, H., et al. 2014. Mass-Spectrometry-Based Draft of the Human Proteome. Nature, 509: 582–7.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, W. S. 2009. Is It a Choice? Sexual Orientation as Interpretation. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40: 97–116.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1975a. Sociobiology – the New SynthesisCambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. & Widom, C. 2010. Does Physical Abuse, Sexual Abuse, or Neglect in Childhood Increase the Likelihood of Same-Sex Sexual Relationships and Cohabitation? A Prospective 30-Year Follow-Up. Arch. Sex. Behav., 39: 63–74.Google Scholar
Winter, T., Kaprio, J., Viken, R. J., et al. 1999. Individual Differences in Adolescent Religiosity in Finland: Familial Effects Are Modified by Sex and Region of Residence. Twin Research, 2: 108–14.Google Scholar
Witelson, S. F., Kigar, D. L., Scamvougeras, A., et al. 2008. Corpus Callosum Anatomy in Right-Handed Homosexual and Heterosexual Men. Arch. Sex. Behav., 37: 857–863.Google Scholar
Witte, J. & Alexander, F. S. 2010. Christianity and Human Rights: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, C. C., Meaburn, E. L., Ronald, A., et al. 2013. Methylomic Analysis of Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Autism Spectrum Disorder and Related Behavioural Traits. Mol Psychiatry, 19: 495–503.Google Scholar
Wood, A. R., Esko, T., Yang, J., et al. 2014. Defining the Role of Common Variation in the Genomic and Biological Architecture of Adult Human Height. Nat Genet, 46: 1173–86.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, J. 1982. Eugenics and the Feeble-Minded: The Parliamentary Debates of 1912–14. History of Education, 11: 127–37.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2010. Causation in Biology: Stability, Specificity, and the Choice of Levels of Explanation. Biology and Philosophy, 25: 287–318.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and Causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20: 557–585.Google Scholar
Wu, Q., Wen, T. Q., Lee, G., et al. 2003. Developmental Control of Foraging and Social Behavior by the Drosophila Neuropeptide Y-Like System. Neuron, 39: 147–161.Google Scholar
Xiao, R. & Boehnke, M. 2009. Quantifying and Correcting for the Winner’s Curse in Genetic Association Studies. Genet Epidemiol, 33: 453–62.Google Scholar
Xu, S., Wilf, R., Menon, T., et al. 2014. Epigenetic Control of Learning and Memory in Drosophila by Tip60 HAT Action. Genetics, 198: 1571–86.Google Scholar
Xu, X., Mar, R. A. & Peterson, J. B. 2013. Does Cultural Exposure Partially Explain the Association between Personality and Political Orientation? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 39: 1497–517.Google Scholar
Xue, Z., Huang, K., Cai, C., et al. 2013. Genetic Programs in Human and Mouse Early Embryos Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Nature, 500: 593–7.Google Scholar
Yamashita, T. & Kwak, S. 2013. The Molecular Link between Inefficient Glua2 Q/R Site-RNA Editing and TDP-43 Pathology in Motor Neurons of Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients. Brain Res, 1584: 28–38.Google Scholar
Yampolsky, L. Y., Glazko, G. V. & Fry, J. D. 2012. Evolution of Gene Expression and Expression Plasticity in Long-Term Experimental Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster Maintained under Constant and Variable Ethanol Stress. Mol. Ecol., 21: 4287–4299.Google Scholar
Yang, B. Z., Zhang, H., Ge, W., et al. 2013. Child Abuse and Epigenetic Mechanisms of Disease Risk. Am J Prev Med, 44: 101–7.Google Scholar
Yau, S. Y., Gil-Mohapel, J., Christie, B. R., et al. 2014. Physical Exercise-Induced Adult Neurogenesis: A Good Strategy to Prevent Cognitive Decline in Neurodegenerative Diseases? Biomed Res Int, 2014: 403120.Google Scholar
Young, L. J. & Hammock, E. A. 2007. On Switches and Knobs, Microsatellites and Monogamy. Trends Genet, 23: 209–12.Google Scholar
Young, L. J., Nilsen, R., Waymire, K. G., et al. 1999. Increased Affiliative Response to Vasopressin in Mice Expressing the V-1a Receptor from a Monogamous Vole. Nature, 400: 766–768.Google Scholar
Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., et al. 1997. Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36: 549–564.Google Scholar
Zoghbi, H. Y. & Bear, M. F. 2012. Synaptic Dysfunction in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Associated with Autism and Intellectual Disabilities. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 4.Google Scholar
Zucker, K., Mitchell, J., Bradley, S., et al. 2006. The Recalled Childhood Gender Identity/Gender Role Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties. Sex Roles, 54: 469–483.Google Scholar
Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S. R., et al. 2012. The Mystery of Missing Heritability: Genetic Interactions Create Phantom Heritability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109: 1193–8.Google Scholar
Zwarts, L., Magwire, M. M., Carbone, M. A., et al. 2011. Complex Genetic Architecture of Drosophila Aggressive Behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108: 17070–17075.Google Scholar
Zwarts, L., Versteven, M. & Callaerts, P. 2012. Genetics and Neurobiology of Aggression in Drosophila. Fly, 6: 35–48.Google Scholar
Zwijnenburg, P. J. G., Meijers-Heijboer, H. & Boomsma, D. I. 2010. Identical but Not the Same: The Value of Discordant Monozygotic Twins in Genetic Research. Am J Med Genet B, 153B: 1134–1149.Google Scholar