100 Pearls of Wisdom by Navoi (Tashkent: Yangi Asr Avlodi, 2016).Google Scholar

Address by Ujal Singh Bhatia (Chairman of the Appellate Body), “The Problems of Plenty: Challenging Times for the WTO’s Dispute Settlement System,” 8 June 2017, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news17_e/ab_08jun17_e.pdf.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kym, “Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3560, 2005.Google Scholar

Anderson, Robert D. and Osei-Lah, Kodjo, “The Coverage Negotiations under the Agreement on Government Procurement: Context, Mandate, Process and Prospects,” in Arrowsmith, Sue and Anderson, Robert D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 149–74.Google Scholar

Anderson, Robert D. and Arrowsmith, Sue, “The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Past, Present and Future,” in Arrowsmith, Sue and Anderson, Robert D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 3–58.Google Scholar

APEC Leaders’ Declaration (2011), www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2011/2011_aelm/2011_aelm_annexD.aspx.Google Scholar

APEC, “Progress Report on 2011 Baseline Study on Good Regulatory Practices,” APEC#213-CT-01.13, 2014.Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank, “Asian Economic Integration Report 2015: How Can Special Economic Zones Catalyze Economic Development?,” 2015.Google Scholar

Azmeh, Shamel and Foster, Christopher, “The TPP and the Digital Trade Agenda: Digital Industrial Policy and Silicon Valley’s Influence on New Trade Agreements,” Working Paper No. 16–175, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2016.Google Scholar

Bacchetta, Marc and Ruta, Michele (eds.), The WTO, Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (Cheltenham, the United Kingdom/Northampton, MA, the United States: Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W., “An Economic Theory of GATT,” 89 American Economic Review 215 (1999).Google Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W., “Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?,” 96 American Economic Review 877 (2006).Google Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W., The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Bahar, Heymi, Egeland, Jagoda, and Steenblik, Ronald, “Domestic Incentive Measures for Renewable Energy with Possible Trade Implications,” OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2013/01, 2013.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert E., “The Case against Infant-Industry Tariff Protection,” 77 Journal of Political Economy 295 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, “Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings,” 35 Journal of World Trade 499 (2001).Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, “The Chapeau of the General Exceptions in the WTO GATT and GATS Agreements: A Reconstruction,” 109 American Journal of International Law 95 (2015).Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, “The WTO Legality of the Application of the EU’s Emission Trading System to Aviation,” 23 European Journal of International Law 429 (2012).Google Scholar

Baschuk, Bryce, “U.S. Demands Exacerbate WTO Dispute Body Turmoil,” Bloomberg BNA, International Trade Daily, 12 September 2017.Google Scholar

Berry, Renee and Reisman, Matthew, “Policy Challenges of Cross-Border Cloud Computing,” 4(2) Journal of International Commerce and Economics 1 (2012).Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish and Ramaswami, V. K., “Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy,” 71 Journal of Political Economy 44 (1963).Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, “More on the Equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas,” 58 American Economic Review 142 (1968).Google Scholar

Blanchard, Emily J., Bown, Chad P., and Johnson, Robert C., “Global Supply Chains and Trade Policy,” NBER Working Paper No. 21883, 2016.Google Scholar

Bonsi, Richard, Hammet, A. L., and Smith, Bob, “Eco-Labels and International Trade: Problems and Solutions,” 42 Journal of World Trade 407 (2008).Google Scholar

Bora, Bijit, Lloyd, Peter J., and Pangestu, Mary, “Industrial Policy and the WTO,” UNCTAD Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 6, 2000.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P. Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2009).Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P., “Will the Proposed US Border Tax Provoke WTO Retaliation from Trading Partners?,” Policy Brief No. PB17–11, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2017.Google Scholar

Boyenge, Jean-Pierre Singa, “ILO Database on Export Processing Zones (Revised),” ILO Working Paper No. WP.251, 2007.Google Scholar

Brander, James A. and Spencer, Barbara J., “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,” 18 Journal of International Economics 83 (1985).Google Scholar

Brou, Daniel and Ruta, Michele, “A Commitment Theory of Subsidy Agreements,” WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD–2012–15, 2012.Google Scholar

Brou, Daniel, Campanella, Edoardo, and Ruta, Michele, “The Value of Domestic Subsidy Rules in Trade Agreements,” WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD–2009–12, 2009.Google Scholar

Carmody, Chi, “When ‘Cultural Identity Was Not at Issue’: Thinking about Canada – Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals,” 30 Law and Policy in International Business 231 (1999).Google Scholar

Chang, Ha-Joon, Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (London: Anthem Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Chang, Seung Wha, “GATTing a Green Trade Barrier: Eco-Labelling and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade,” 31 Journal of World Trade 137 (1997).Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, “The Law of Environmental ‘PPMs’ in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality,” 27 Yale Journal of International Law 59 (2002).Google Scholar

Cheyne, Ilona, “Proportionality, Proximity and Environmental Labelling in WTO Law,” 12 Journal of International Economic Law 927 (2009).Google Scholar

China’s State Council, “Made in China 2025,” http://english.gov.cn/2016special/madeinchina2025.Google Scholar

Choi, Won-mog, “Like Products” in International Trade Law: Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Christakos, Helen A., “WTO Panel Report on Section 110(5) of the U.S. Copyright Act,” 17 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 595 (2002).Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EU) No. 473/2010 of 31 May 2010 Imposing a Provisional Countervailing Duty on Imports of Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate Originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates, OJ L 134/25 (1 June 2010).Google Scholar

Conrad, Christiane R., Processes and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: Interfacing Trade and Social Goals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Cook, Graham, A Digest of WTO Jurisprudence on Public International Law Concepts and Principles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Coppens, Dominic, WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Cosbey, Aaron and Mavroidis, Petros C., “A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO,” 17 Journal of International Economic Law 11 (2014).Google Scholar

Czapnik, Ben, “The Unique Features of the Trade Facilitation Agreement: A Revolutionary New Approach to Multilateral Negotiations or the Exception Which Proves the Rule?,” 18 Journal of International Economic Law 773 (2015).Google Scholar

Davidson, Carl, Matusz, Steven J., and Kreinin, Mordechai E., “Analysis of Performance Standards for Direct Foreign Investments,” 18 Canadian Journal of Economics 876 (1985).Google Scholar

Deardorff, Alan V., “The Economics of Government Market Intervention and Its International Dimension,” in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 71–84.Google Scholar

Desai, Mihir A. and Hines, James R., “Market Reactions to Export Subsidies,” 74 Journal of International Economics 459 (2008).Google Scholar

Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Include Aviation Activities in the Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community, OJ L 8 (13 January 2009).Google Scholar

Dixit, Avinash, “International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,” 94 Economic Journal (supplement) 1–16 (1984).Google Scholar

Eaton, Jonathan and Grossman, Gene M., “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly,” 101 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 383 (1986).Google Scholar

Ecolabel Index (the global directory of ecolabels), www.ecolabelindex.com.Google Scholar

Ehring, Lothar, “Article IV [of the GATT],” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias, and Hestermeyer, Holger P. (eds.), WTO – Trade in Goods (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 166–82.Google Scholar

Eliason, Antonia, “The Trade Facilitation Agreement: A New Hope for the World Trade Organization,” 14 World Trade Review 643 (2015).Google Scholar

Engman, Michael, Onodera, Osamu, and Pinali, Enrico, “Export Processing Zones: Past and Future Role in Trade and Development,” OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 53, 2007.Google Scholar

Epps, Tracey and Green, Andrew, Reconciling Trade and Climate: How the WTO Can Help Address Climate Change (Cheltenham, the United Kingdom/Northampton, MA, the United States: Edward Elgar, 2010).Google Scholar

European Commission Green Paper, “Unlocking the Potential of Cultural and Creative Industries,” COM(2010) 183 final, 2010.Google Scholar

European Commission, “European Union Funding,” https://ec.europa.eu/culture/policy/cultural-creative-industries/eu-funding_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, “Investing in a Smart, Innovative and Sustainable Industry: A Renewed EU Industrial Policy Strategy,” Communication from the Commission, 13 September 2017.Google Scholar

European Commission, “State of the Union 2017 – Industrial Policy Strategy: Investing in a Smart, Innovative and Sustainable Industry,” Press Release, 18 September 2017, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17–3185_en.htm.Google Scholar

European Commission, “Supporting Cultural and Creative Industries,” https://ec.europa.eu/culture/policy/cultural-creative-industries_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, “The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS),” 2016, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/factsheet_ets_en.pdf.Google Scholar

European Office of the UN, “Adoption and Signature of the Final Act,” Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the UN Conference on Trade and Employment, Press Release No. 469, 27 October 1947.Google Scholar

European Parliament Resolution of 12 September 2013 on Promoting the European Cultural and Creative Sectors as Sources of Economic Growth and Jobs, 2012/2302(INI).Google Scholar

Ezell, Stephen J., Atkinson, Robert D., and Wein, Michelle A., “Localization Barriers to Trade: Threat to the Global Innovation Economy,” Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2013.Google Scholar

Feichtner, Isabel, The Law and Politics of WTO Waivers: Stability and Flexibility in Public International Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

FIAS, “Special Economic Zones: Performance, Lessons Learned, and Implications for Zone Development,” 2008.Google Scholar

Finger, J. M., “Effects of the Kennedy Round Tariff Concessions on the Exports of Developing Countries,” 86 The Economic Journal 87 (1976).Google Scholar

Fliess, Barbara and Mård, Tarja, “Taking Stock of Measures Restricting the Export of Raw Materials: Analysis of OECD Inventory Data,” OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 140, 2012.Google Scholar

Fliess, Barbara, Arriola, Christine, and Liapis, Peter, “Recent Developments in the Use of Export Restrictions in Raw Materials Trade,” in OECD, “Export Restrictions in Raw Materials Trade: Facts, Fallacies and Better Practices,” 2014, pp. 17–61.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lisa and Plumer, Brad, “E.P.A. Announces Repeal of Major Obama-Era Carbon Emissions Rule,” New York Times, 9 October 2017, www.nytimes.com/2017/10/09/climate/clean-power-plan.html.Google Scholar

Fung, K.C. and Korinek, Jane, “Economics of Export Restrictions as Applied to Industrial Raw Materials,” OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 155, 2013.Google Scholar

Galt, Frederic Scott, “The Life, Death, and Rebirth of the ‘Cultural Exception’ in the Multilateral Trading System: An Evolutionary Analysis of Cultural Protection and Intervention in the Face of American Pop Culture’s Hegemony,” 3 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 909 (2004).Google Scholar

Garnham, Nicholas, “From Cultural to Creative Industries,” 11(1) International Journal of Cultural Policy 15 (2005).Google Scholar

GATT Analytical Index, Guide to GATT Law and Practice, updated 6th edn., 2 vols. (Geneva: WTO, 1995).Google Scholar

GATT, Accession of Panama: Questions and Replies to the Memorandum on Foreign Trade Regime (L/7228), L/7426 (30 March 1994).Google Scholar

GATT, Application of GATT to International Trade in Television Programmes – Report of the Working Party, L/1741 (13 March 1962).Google Scholar

GATT, Contracting Parties – Nineteenth Session – [13 November – 8 December 1961] – Application of GATT to International Trade in Television Programmes, L/1615 (16 November 1961).Google Scholar

GATT, Contracting Parties – Nineteenth Session – [13 November – 8 December 1961] – Application of GATT to International Trade in Television Programmes – Statement Made by the US Representatives on 21 November 1961, L/1646 (24 November 1961).Google Scholar

GATT, Council – Minutes of Meeting – Held in the Center William Rappard on 11 October 1989, C/M/236 (6 November 1989).Google Scholar

GATT, Report of the Working Party on Border Tax Adjustments, L/3464, adopted 2 December 1970.Google Scholar

GATT, Uruguay Round – Group of Negotiations on Goods (GATT) – Negotiating Group on SCM – Draft Text on SCM, MTN.GNG/NG10/23 (7 November 1990).Google Scholar

Ghosh, Arunabha, “Information Gaps, Information Systems, and the WTO’s Trade Policy Review Mechanism,” GEG Working Paper No. 2008/40, University of Oxford, 2008.Google Scholar

GOV.UK, “Creative Industries Mapping Documents 1998,” www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-1998.Google Scholar

Granados, Jaime, “Export Processing Zones and Other Special Regimes in the Context of Multilateral and Regional Trade Negotiations,” Occasional Paper No. 20, Inter-American Development Bank, 2003.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M., “The Theory of Domestic Content Protection and Content Preference,” 96 Quarterly Journal of Economics 583 (1981).Google Scholar

Guan, Wenwei, “Consensus Yet Not Consented: A Critique of the WTO Decision-Making by Consensus,” 17 Journal of International Economic Law 77 (2014).Google Scholar

Hahn, Michael, “A Clash of Cultures? The UNESCO Diversity Convention and International Trade Law,” 9 Journal of International Economic Law 515 (2006).Google Scholar

Harrison, Ann and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, “Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries,” in Rodrik, Dani and Rosenzweig, Mark (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (North-Holland: Elsevier, 2010), vol. 5, pp. 4039–214.Google Scholar

Herman, Lior, “Multilateralising Regionalism: The Case of E-Commerce,” OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 99, 2010.Google Scholar

HKU, “The Entrepreneurial Dimension of the Cultural and Creative Industries,” Hogeschool vor de Kunsten Utrecht, Utrecht, 2010.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard, “Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment,” 8 Journal of International Economic Law 405 (2005).Google Scholar

Holcombe, Randall G., “South Korea’s Economic Future: Industrial Policy, or Economic Democracy?,” 88 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (2013).Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., “To B(TA) or Not to B(TA)? On the Legality and Desirability of Border Tax Adjustments from a Trade Perspective,” 34 The World Economy 1911 (2011).Google Scholar

Howkins, John, The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas, 2nd edn. (London: Penguin Books, 2013).Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Eliason, Antonia L., “Domestic and International Strategies to Address Climate Change: An Overview of the WTO Legal Issues,” in Cottier, Thomas, Nartova, Olga, and Bigdeli, Sadeq Z. (eds.), International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 48–93.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Regan, Donald, “The Product/Process Distinction – An Illusory Basis for Disciplining ‘Unilateralism’ in Trade Policy,” 11 European Journal of International Law 249 (2000).Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E., The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy, 2nd edn. (Salem, NH: Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde et al., Local Content Requirements: A Global Problem (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2013).Google Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Charnovitz, Steve, and Kim, Jisun, Global Warming and the World Trading System (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2009).Google Scholar

ILO, “Good Practices in Labour Inspection in Export Processing Zones,” 2012.Google Scholar

India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry, “Formulation of a New Industrial Policy,” 29 August 2017, http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=170319.Google Scholar

India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry, “Industrial Policy – 2017,” Discussion Paper, 2017, http://dipp.nic.in/sites/default/files/Industrial_policy_2017_DP.pdf.Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report,” 2015.Google Scholar

International Energy Agency, “Renewables,” www.iea.org/topics/renewables.Google Scholar

International Institute for Sustainable Development, “The ISO 14020 Series,” www.iisd.org/business/markets/eco_label_iso14020.aspx.Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A. and Pavchik, Nina, “Airbus versus Boeing Revisited: International Competition in the Aircraft Market,” 64 Journal of International Economics 223 (2004).Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A., “The Aftermath of Hamilton’s ‘Report on Manufactures’,” 64 The Journal of Economic History 800 (2004).Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A., Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sykes, Alan O., The Genesis of the GATT (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Ismer, R. and Neuhoff, K., “Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible Way to Address Nonparticipation in Emission Trading,” CMI Working Paper No. 36, 2004.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. “International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to ‘Buy Out’?,” 98 American Journal of International Law 109 (2004).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H., Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Johannesson, Louise and Mavroidis, Petros C., “Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges,” 49 Journal of World Trade 685 (2015).Google Scholar

Johnson, Harry G., “Optimal Trade Intervention in the Presence of Domestic Distortions,” in Caves, R.E., Johnson, H.G., and Kenen, P.B. (eds.), Trade, Growth, and the Balance of Payments: Essays in Honor of Gottfried Haberler (Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1965), pp. 3–34.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Christine and Weber, Rolf H., “Carbon-Related Border Tax Adjustment: Mitigating Climate Change or Restricting International Trade?,” 10 World Trade Review 497 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

KDI School of Public Policy and Management, “K-Developedia,” www.kdevelopedia.org.Google Scholar

Keck, Alexander and Low, Patrick, “Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When and How?,” WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD–2004–03, 2004.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Scott, “Made in China 2025,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2015, www.csis.org/analysis/made-china-2025.Google Scholar

Kim, Jeong-gon, Kim, Eun-ji, and Kim, Yun-ok, “Cases of Creative Economy Promotion and Their Implications,” World Economy Update, vol. 3(36), Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, 2013.Google Scholar

Kogan, Lawrence A., “Coherent International Trade Policies Hasten, Not Retard, Cloud Computing,” 7 Global Trade and Customs Journal 379 (2012).Google Scholar

Korea’s Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning, “Creative Economy Opens up a New Era of Korea: Action Plan for the Creative Economy,” 2013.Google Scholar

Korea’s Ministry of Strategy and Finance, “Creative Economy Action Plan and Measures to Establish a Creative Economic Ecosystem,” Press Release, 5 June 2013, http://english.mosf.go.kr/pre/view.do?bcd=N0001&seq=3289.Google Scholar

Korinek, Jane and Bartos, Jessica, “Multilateralising Regionalism: Disciplines on Export Restrictions in Regional Trade Agreements,” OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 139, 2012.Google Scholar

Krishna, Kala and Itoh, Motoshige, “Content Protection and Oligopolistic Interactions,” 55 Review of Economic Studies 107 (1988).Google Scholar

Krueger, Anne O., “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society,” 64 American Economic Review 291 (1974).Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul R., “Targeted Industrial Policies: Theory and Evidence,” Proceedings, Economic Policy Symposium, Jackson Hole, 1983, pp. 123–76.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul R., Obstfeld, Maurice, and Melitz, Marc J., International Economics: Theory and Policy, 10th edn. (Boston: Pearson, 2015).Google Scholar

Lall, Sanjaya, “Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: What Can We Learn from East Asia?,” in Bianchi, Patrizio and Labory, Sandrine (eds.), International Handbook on Industrial Policy (Cheltenham, the United Kingdom/Northampton, MA, the United States: Edward Elgar, 2006), pp. 79–97.Google Scholar

Lee, Juneyoung et al., “Energy-Related Rules in Accession Protocols: Where are They?,” in Dadush, Uri and Osakwe, Chiedu (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 701–28.Google Scholar

Leitner, Kara and Lester, Simon, “WTO Dispute Settlement 1995–2015 – A Statistical Analysis,” 19 Journal of International Economic Law 289 (2016).Google Scholar

Lim, Wonhyuk, “The Chaebol and Industrial Policy in Korea,” in Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Yifu Lin, Justin (eds.), The Industrial Policy Revolution I: The Role of Government Beyond Ideology (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), pp. 348–70.Google Scholar

List, Friedrich, The National System of Political Economy (originally published in 1841), translated by Lloyd, Sampson S. (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1909).Google Scholar

Lui, Francis T. and Qiu, Larry D., “Taiwan: Thriving High-Technology Industries and SMEs,” in Kai-Sun, Kwong et al. (eds.), Industrial Development in Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea (Singapore: World Scientific, 2001), pp. 56–117.Google Scholar

Maggi, Giovanni and Rodriguez-Clare, Andres, “The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures,” 106 Journal of Political Economy 574 (1998).Google Scholar

Mah, Jai S., “Industrial Policy and Economic Development: Korea’s Experience,” 41 Journal of Economic Issues 77 (2007).Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle Z. and Hawkins, Jennifer K., “Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement,” 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 493 (2012).Google Scholar

Meier, Gerald M., “The Tokyo Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations and the Developing Countries,” 13 Cornell International Law Journal 239 (1980).Google Scholar

Melitz, Marc J., “When and How Should Infant Industries be Protected?,” 66 Journal of International Economics 177 (2005).Google Scholar

Meltzer, Joshua, “Climate Change and Trade – The EU Aviation Directive and the WTO,” 15 Journal of International Economic Law 111 (2012).Google Scholar

Moran, Theodore H., “The Impact of TRIMs on Trade and Development,” 1 Transnational Corporations 55 (1992).Google Scholar

Mussa, Michael, “The Economics of Content Protection,” NBER Working Paper No. 1457, 1984.Google Scholar

Nathan, Max and Overman, Henry, “Agglomeration, Clusters, and Industrial Policy,” 29 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 383 (2013).Google Scholar

National Board of Trade (Sweden), “How Borderless is the Cloud? An Introduction to Cloud Computing and International Trade,” 2012.Google Scholar

Naudé, Wim, “Industrial Policy: Old and New Issues,” UNU–WIDER Working Paper No. 2010/106, 2010.Google Scholar

Naudé, Wim, “New Challenges for Industrial Policy,” UNU–WIDER Working Paper No. 2010/107, 2010.Google Scholar

Neuwirth, Rostam J., “Global Market Integration and the Creative Economy: The Paradox of Industry Convergence and Regulatory Divergence,” 18 Journal of International Economic Law 21 (2015).Google Scholar

Noland, Marcus and Pack, Howard, Industrial Policy in an Era of Globalization: Lessons from Asia (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 2003).Google Scholar

OECD, “E-books: Developments and Policy Considerations,” OECD Digital Economy Paper No. 208, 2012.Google Scholar

OECD, “Effects of Eco-Labelling Schemes: Compilation of Recent Studies,” Joint Working Party on Trade and Environment, COM/ENV/TD(2004)34/FINAL, 2005.Google Scholar

OECD, “Environment and Regional Trade Agreements,” 2007.Google Scholar

OECD, “Export Restrictions in Raw Materials Trade: Facts, Fallacies and Better Practices,” 2014.Google Scholar

OECD, “Objectives and Instruments of Industrial Policy: A Comparative Study,” 1975.Google Scholar

OECD, “Tax: Tax Revenue,” https://data.oecd.org/tax/tax-revenue.htm.Google Scholar

OECD, “Tourism and the Creative Economy,” 2014.Google Scholar

OECD–WTO, “Aid for Trade at a Glance 2015: Reducing Trade Costs for Inclusive, Sustainable Growth,” 2015.Google Scholar

Oh, Wonsun, “Export Processing Zones in the Republic of Korea: Economic Impact and Social Issues,” ILO Working Paper No. 75, 1993.Google Scholar

Ohashi, Hiroshi, “Learning by Doing, Export Subsidies, and Industry Growth: Japanese Steel in the 1950s and 1960s,” 66 Journal of International Economics 297 (2005).Google Scholar

Ortino, Federico, “Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US – Gambling: A Critique,” 9 Journal of International Economic Law 117(2006).Google Scholar

Osakwe, Chiedu “Contributions and Lessons from WTO Accessions: The Present and Future of the Rules-based Multilateral Trading System,” in Dadush, Uri and Osakwe, Chiedu (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 219–308.Google Scholar

Osakwe, Chiedu and Lee, Juneyoung, “The Future of Multilateral Investment Rules in the WTO: Contributions from WTO Accession Outcomes,” in Dadush, Uri and Osakwe, Chiedu (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 818–49.Google Scholar

Pack, Howard and Saggi, Kamal, “Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey,” 21 The World Bank Research Observer 267 (2006).Google Scholar

Pal, Rajib, “Has the Appellate Body’s Decision in Canada – Renewable Energy / Canada – Feed-in Tariff Program Opened the Door for Production Subsidies?,” 17 Journal of International Economic Law 125 (2014).Google Scholar

Park, Nohyoung and Chung, Myung-Hyun, “Analysis of a New Mediation Procedure under the WTO SPS Agreement,” 50 Journal of World Trade 93 (2016).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, “The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?,” 95 American Journal of International Law 535 (2001).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, “The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement,” 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 325 (2002).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, “U.S. Federal Climate Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law,” Working Paper No. NI WP 07–02, Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University, 2007.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi and Liu, Han-wei, “The Legality of Data Residency Requirements: How Can the Trans-Pacific Partnership Help?,” 51 Journal of World Trade 183 (2017).Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi, “Cybersecurity Threats and the WTO National Security Exceptions,” 18 Journal of International Economic Law 449 (2015).Google Scholar

Peres, Wilson and Primi, Annalisa, “Theory and Practice of Industrial Policy: Evidence from the Latin American Experience,” CEPAL Desarrollo Productivo Serie No. 187, 2009.Google Scholar

Perkins, Dwight H., East Asian Development: Foundations and Strategies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Pogoretskyy, Vitaliy, “Energy Dual Pricing in International Trade: Subsidies and Anti-Dumping Perspectives,” in Selivanova, Yulia (ed.), Regulation of Energy in International Trade Law: WTO, NAFTA and Energy Charter (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011), pp. 181–228.Google Scholar

Qin, Julia Ya, “Pushing the Limits of Global Governance: Trading Rights, Censorship and WTO Jurisprudence – A Commentary on the China – Publications Case,” 10 Chinese Journal of International Law 271 (2011).Google Scholar

Qin, Julia Ya, “Reforming WTO Discipline on Export Duties: Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Economic Development and Environmental Protection,” 46 Journal of World Trade 1147 (2012).Google Scholar

Raff, Horst and Kim, Young-Han, “Optimal Export Policy in the Presence of Informational Barriers to Entry and Imperfect Competition,” 49 Journal of International Economics 99 (1999).Google Scholar

REN21, “Renewables 2016: Global Status Report,” 2016.Google Scholar

Richardson, Martin, “The Effects of a Content Requirement on a Foreign Duopsonist,” 31 Journal of International Economics 143 (1991).Google Scholar

Ripinsky, Sergey, “The System of Gas Dual Pricing in Russia: Compatibility with WTO Rules,” 3 World Trade Review 463 (2004).Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani “Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century,” Harvard University Faculty Research Working Paper No. RWP04–047, 2004.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, “Normalizing Industrial Policy,” Working Paper No. 3, Commission on Growth and Development, 2008.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, “Taking Trade Policy Seriously: Export Subsidization as a Case Study in Policy Effectiveness,” in Levinsohn, Jim, Deardorff, Alan V., and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), New Directions in Trade Theory (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995), pp. 347–84.Google Scholar

Rolland, Sonia E., Development at the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Rubini, Luca, “‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.’ Lessons on Methodology in Legal Analysis from the Recent WTO Litigation on Renewable Energy Subsidies,” 48 Journal of World Trade 895 (2014).Google Scholar

Schwab, Klaus, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond,” Foreign Affairs, 12 December 2015.Google Scholar

Schwab, Klaus, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution,” World Economic Forum, 2016.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Gerd and Clements, Benedict, “Government Subsidies,” 13 Journal of Economic Surveys 119 (1999).Google Scholar

Selivanova, Julia, “World Trade Organization Rules and Energy Pricing: Russia’s Case,” 38 Journal of World Trade 559 (2004).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “Checking RTA Compatibility with Global Trade Rules: WTO Litigation Practice and Implications from the Transparency Mechanism for RTAs,” 45 Journal of World Trade 529 (2011).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “Customs Duty or Internal Charge? Revisiting the Delineation Issue within Treaty Interpretation in the China – Auto Parts Case,” 7 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 195 (2012).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “Duty Drawback and Regional Trade Agreements: Foes or Friends?,” 16 Journal of International Economic Law 587 (2013).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “First WTO Judicial Review of Climate Change Subsidy Issues,” 107 American Journal of International Law 864 (2013).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “How to Pass a Pass-Through Test: The Case of Input Subsidies,” 15 Journal of International Economic Law 621 (2012).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “India – Certain Measures Relating to Solar Cells and Solar Modules,” 111 American Journal of International Law 139 (2017).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “Input Cost Adjustments and WTO Anti-Dumping Law: A Closer Look at the EU Practice,” World Trade Review, forthcoming. Published online 21 January 2018, DOI: 10.1017/S1474745617000568.Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “International Regulation of Free Zones: An Analysis of Multilateral Customs and Trade Rules,” 10 World Trade Review 189 (2011).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “Promotion of ‘Green’ Electricity and International Dispute Settlement: Trade and Investment Issues,” 49 International Lawyer 343 (2016).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “Regulation of Renewable Energy Trade in the Megaregionals Era: Current Issues and Prospects for Rule-Making Reforms,” in Peng, Shin-yi, Liu, Han-Wei, and Lin, Ching-Fu (eds.), Governing Science and Technology under the International Economic Order: Regulatory Divergence and Convergence in the Age of Megaregionals (Cheltenham, the United Kingdom/Northampton, MA, the United States: Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. 160–82.Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to ‘Green’ the SCM Agreement?,” 14 World Trade Review 479 (2015).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, “The ‘Regionalism vs Multilateralism’ Issue in International Trade Law: Revisiting the Peru–Agricultural Products Case,” 16 Chinese Journal of International Law 109 (2017).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, Retaliation in the WTO Dispute Settlement System (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar

Shafaeddin, Mehdi, “How Did Developed Countries Industrialize? The History of Trade and Industrial Policy: The Cases of Great Britain and the USA,” UNCTAD Discussion Paper No. 139, 1998.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, Wolfe, Robert, and Le, Vinhcent, “Can Informal Law Discipline Subsidies?,” 18 Journal of International Economic Law 711 (2015).Google Scholar

Shi, Jingxia and Chen, Weidong, “The ‘Specificity’ of Cultural Products versus the ‘Generality’ of Trade Obligations: Reflecting on ‘China – Publications and Audiovisual Products’,” 45 Journal of World Trade 159 (2011).Google Scholar

South Center and ATPC, “The WTO’s Discussions on Electronic Commerce,” Analytical Note, SC/AN/TDP/2017/2, 2017.Google Scholar

Staiger, Robert W. and Tabellini, Guido, “Discretionary Trade Policy and Excessive Protection,” 77 American Economic Review 823 (1987).Google Scholar

Stern, David I., “The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve,” 32 World Development 1419 (2004).Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E., “Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle,” 11 The World Bank Research Observer 151 (1996).Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E., Lin, Justin Yifu, and Monga, Célestin, “The Rejuvenation of Industrial Policy,” Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS6628, World Bank, 2013.Google Scholar

Stone, Susan, Messent, James, and Flaig, Dorothee, “Emerging Policy Issues: Localisation Barriers to Trade,” OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 180, 2015.Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., “Countervailing Duty Law: An Economic Perspective,” 89 Columbia Law Review 199 (1989).Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., “The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,” John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 186, University of Chicago Law School, 2003.Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., “The Questionable Case for Subsidies Regulation: A Comparative Perspective,” 2 Journal of Legal Analysis 473 (2010).Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., The WTO Agreement on Safeguards: A Commentary (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Takechi, Kazutaka and Kiyono, Kazuharu, “Local Content Protection: Specific-Factor Model for Intermediate Goods Production and Market Segmentation,” 15 Japan and the World Economy 69 (2003).Google Scholar

Throsby, David, The Economics of Cultural Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Torres, Raúl A., “Free Zones and the World Trade Organization Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,” 5 Global Trade and Customs Journal 217 (2007).Google Scholar

Towse, Ruth and Handke, Christian (eds.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy (Cheltenham, the United Kingdom/Northampton, MA, the United States: Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar

UN Conference on Environment and Development, “Agenda 21,” 1992.Google Scholar

UN Division for Sustainable Development, “A Guidebook to the Green Economy – Issue 3: Exploring Green Economy Policies and International Experience with National Strategies,” 2012.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly Resolution 1803 (XVII) on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources, 14 December 1962.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly Resolution, “The Future We Want,” A/RES/66/288 (27 July 2012).Google Scholar

UN Economic and Social Council – Preparatory Committee of the International Conference on Trade and Employment – Verbatim Report of the Second Plenary Meeting Held at Church House, Westminster, S.W.1, on 17 October 1946, E/PC/T/PV/2 (17 October 1946).Google Scholar

UNCTAD and UNDP, “Creative Economy: A Feasible Development Option,” Joint Report, 2010.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, “About GSP,” http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DITC/GSP/About-GSP.aspx.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, “Trade in Creative Products Reached New Peak in 2011, UNCTAD Figures Show,” http://unctad.org/en/pages/newsdetails.aspx?OriginalVersionID=498.Google Scholar

UNEP, “Criterial in Environmental Labelling: A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Criteria in Selected Labelling Schemes,” Environment and Trade, No. 13, cited in WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Market Access Impact of Eco-Labelling Requirements – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/79 (9 March 1998).Google Scholar

UNESCO and UNDP, “Creative Economy Report,” Special Edition, 2013.Google Scholar

UNESCO, “Cultural Industries,” www.unesco.org/bpi/pdf/memobpi25_culturalindustries_en.pdf.Google Scholar

US DOC, Decision Memorandum (17 October 2007), Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Coated Free Sheet from the People’s Republic of China [C-570–907], 72 FR 60645, 25 October 2007.Google Scholar

US DOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors from the Republic of Korea [C-580–851], 68 FR 37122, 23 June 2003.Google Scholar

US International Trade Commission, “Digital Trade in the U.S. and Global Economics, Part 2,” 2014.Google Scholar

US International Trade Commission, “Digital Trade in the U.S. and Global Economies, Part 1,” 2013.Google Scholar

US White House, “America First Foreign Policy,” www.whitehouse.gov/america-first-foreign-policy.Google Scholar

US White House, “An America First Energy Plan,” www.whitehouse.gov/america-first-energy.Google Scholar

VanGrasstek, Craig, The History and Future of the World Trade Organization (Geneva: WTO, 2013).Google Scholar

Veel, Paul-Erik, “Carbon Tariffs and the WTO: An Evaluation of Feasible Policies,” 12 Journal of International Economic Law 749 (2009).Google Scholar

Vermulst, Edwin, The WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Voon, Tania, “A New Approach to Audiovisual Products in the WTO: Rebalancing GATT and GATS,” 14 UCLA Entertainment Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Voon, Tania, “China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products,” 103 American Journal of International Law 710 (2009).Google Scholar

Voon, Tania, Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Vranes, Erich, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Wang, Zhongmei, “Negative List in the SHPFTZ and Its Implications for China’s Future FDI Legal System,” 50 Journal of World Trade 117 (2016).Google Scholar

Warwick, Ken, “Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Paper No. 2, 2013.Google Scholar

WCO, “The Revised Kyoto Convention,” www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/instrument-and-tools/conventions/pf_revised_kyoto_conv.aspx.Google Scholar

Weber, Rolf H. and Koch, Rika, “International Trade Law Challenges by Subsidies for Renewable Energy,” 49 Journal of World Trade 757 (2015).Google Scholar

Weber, Rolf H., “Digital Trade and E-Commerce: Challenges and Opportunities of the Asia-Pacific Regionalism,” 10 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 321 (2015).Google Scholar

Weber, Rolf H., “Regulatory Autonomy and Privacy Standards under the GATS,” 7 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 25 (2012).Google Scholar

Wikipedia, “Colón Free Trade Zone,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Col%C3%B3n_Free_Trade_Zone.Google Scholar

Williams, Peter John, A Handbook on Accession to the WTO (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Williamson, John, “What Washington Means by Policy Reform,” in Williamson, John (ed.), Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 1990), available at https://piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/what-washington-means-policy-reform.Google Scholar

World Bank and Ecofys, “State and Trends of Carbon Pricing,” Joint Report, 2015.Google Scholar

World Bank, The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

WTO Analytical Index, Guide to WTO Law and Practice, www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index_e/analytic_index_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO and UNEP, “Trade and Climate Change,” Joint Report, 2009.Google Scholar

WTO, “Appellate Body Members,” www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/ab_members_descrp_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Azevêdo: Global Trading System Has Constructive Role to Play to Help Drive Inclusivity,” Speech, 30 October 2017, www.wto.org/english/news_e/spra_e/spra195_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Business Leaders Call for WTO to Address Pressing Business Issues,” 30 May 2016, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news16_e/bus_30may16_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Businesses Share Ideas on Rules for Inclusive Trade,” 28 September 2016, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news16_e/bus_28sep16_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Chronological List of Disputes Cases,” www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_status_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Detailed Presentation of Environmental Requirements and Market Access, including Labelling for Environmental Purposes,” WTO E-Learning, 2013, https://ecampus.wto.org/admin/files/Course_385/Module_2423/ModuleDocuments/TE_Req-L2-R2-E.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, “Disputes by Agreement: Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,” www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_agreements_index_e.htm?id=A20#.Google Scholar

WTO, “Electronic Commerce: Work Continues on Issues Needing Clarification,” www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/ecom_e/ecom_briefnote_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Exploring the Links between Subsidies, Trade and the WTO,” World Trade Report, 2006.Google Scholar

WTO, “Exploring the Links between Trade, Standards and the WTO,” World Trade Report, 2005.Google Scholar

WTO, “I-TIP Services,” http://i-tip.wto.org/services/default.aspx.Google Scholar

WTO, “LDCs Welcome Progress on Preferential Treatment for Services,” 2 November 2015, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news15_e/serv_02nov15_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Recent Developments in Regional Trade Agreements (July–December 2016),” INT/SUB/RTA/153, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/rtajuly-dec16_e.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, “Six Decades of Multilateral Trade Cooperation: What Have We Learnt?,” World Trade Report, 2007.Google Scholar

WTO, “Special and Differential Treatment: Grappling with 88 Proposals,” www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min03_e/brief_e/brief21_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Statistics on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,” www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/scm_e/scm_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “Technical Barriers to Trade Information Management System,” http://tbtims.wto.org.Google Scholar

WTO, “The WTO and Trade Economics: Theory and Policy,” WTO E-Learning, 2012, https://ecampus.wto.org/admin/files/Course_492/CourseContents/TEC-E-Print.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, “Trade and Environment at the WTO,” 2004.Google Scholar

WTO, “Trade and Public Policies: A Closer Look at Non-Tariff Measures in the 21^st Century,” World Trade Report, 2012.Google Scholar

WTO, “Trade in Natural Resources,” World Trade Report, 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, “Trade in Services: The Most Dynamic Segment of International Trade,” www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/20y_e/services_brochure2015_e.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, “Trade Monitoring Database,” http://tmdb.wto.org.Google Scholar

WTO, “Trade Policy Commitments and Contingency Measures,” World Trade Report, 2009.Google Scholar

WTO, “Understanding the WTO,” 5th edn., 2015.Google Scholar

WTO, “World Tariff Profiles,” 2016.Google Scholar

WTO, “WTO Business Survey,” www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/survey13_e.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, “WTO Matrix on Trade-Related Measures Pursuant to Selected Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs),” www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_matrix_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, “WTO Members Conclude Landmark $1.3 Trillion IT Trade Deal,” 16 December 2015, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news15_e/ita_16dec15_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, Accession of Ecuador – Decision of 16 August 1995, WT/ACC/ECU/5 (22 August 1995).Google Scholar

WTO, Accession of the People’s Republic of China – Decision of 10 November 2001, WT/L/432 (23 November 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, China – Measures Concerning Wind Power Equipment – Request for Consultations by the US, WT/DS419/1, G/L/950, G/SCM/D86/1 (6 January 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Antidumping Practices – Recommendation Regarding Annual Reviews of the Anti-Dumping Agreement – Adopted by the Committee on 27 November 2002, G/ADP/9 (29 November 2002).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Government Procurement – Minutes of the Formal Meeting of 11 February 2015, GPA/M/59 (4 May 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Government Procurement – Minutes of the Formal Meeting of 29 October 2014, GPA/M/57 (22 December 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Government Procurement – Minutes of the Formal Meeting of 25 June 2014, GPA/M/56 (4 September 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Market Access – Canadian Government Actions to Unilaterally Eliminate Certain Most-Favoured-Nation Applied Tariffs – Communication from Canada, G/MA/W/101 (19 April 2010).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Market Access – Minutes of the Meeting Held on 29 April 2009, G/MA/M/51 (26 May 2010).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Market Access – Minutes of the Meeting Held on 16 October 2012, G/MA/M/56 (8 January 2013).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Market Access – Situation of Schedules of WTO Members – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/MA/W/23/Rev.12 (11 April 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Safeguards – Formats for Certain Notifications under the Agreement on Safeguards – Note from the Secretariat, G/SG/1/Rev.1, G/SG/N/6/Rev.1, G/SG/89 (5 November 2009).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held on 25 October 2016, G/SCM/M/99 (16 January 2017).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held on 26 and 27 October 2011, G/SCM/M/79 (2 February 2012).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Minutes of the Special Meeting Held on 4 May 1999, G/SCM/M/21 (21 September 1999).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Notification Requirements under the SCM Agreement – Background Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SCM/W/546/Rev.7 (31 March 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Questionnaire Format for Subsidy Notifications under Article 25 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Counte[…]cle XVI of GATT 1994 – Revision, G/SCM/6/Rev.1 (11 November 2003).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Subsidies – New and Full Notification Pursuant to Article XVI:1 of the GATT 1994 and Article 25 of the A[…]Countervailing Measures – Korea, G/SCM/N/220/KOR (23 September 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Subsidies – Replies to Questions Posed by the EC Regarding the New and Full Notification of Panama – Revision, G/SCM/Q2/PAN/6/Rev.1 (13 April 1999).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Subsidies – Requests Pursuant to Article 27.4 of the SCM Agreement – Requests Pursuant to the Procedure in Document G/SCM/39 – Costa Rica, G/SCM/N/74/CRI (20 December 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Specific Commitments – Report of the Meeting Held on 14 October 2015 – Note by the Secretariat, S/CSC/M/74 (27 November 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – SPS Agreement and Developing Countries – Statement by Egypt at the Meeting of 7–8 July 1999, G/SPS/GEN/128 (16 July 1999).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – STCs – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.16 (23 February 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Summary of the Meeting Held on 21–22 June 2000 – Note by the Secretariat, G/SPS/R/19 (1 August 2000).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Decisions and Recommendations adopted by the WTO Committee on TBT since 1 January 1995 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/TBT/1/Rev.12 (21 January 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Fifth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on TBT under Article 15.4, G/TBT/26 (13 November 2009).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Seventh Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on TBT under Article 15.4, G/TBT/37 (3 December 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Twenty-first Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/TBT/38/Rev.1 (24 March 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Development – S&D Treatment Provisions in WTO Agreements and Decisions – Note by the Secretariat, WT/COMTD/W/219 (22 September 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Committee on TBT – Negotiating History of the Coverage of the Agreement on TBT […]stics – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/10, G/TBT/W/11 (29 August 1995).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Matrix on Trade Measures Pursuant to Selected Multilateral Enviro[…]e by the Secretariat – Revision, WT/CTE/W/160/Rev.7, TN/TE/S/5/Rev.5 (4 September 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Environmental (Sustainability) Assessments of Trade Liberalization Agreements at the National Level – Item 2 of the Work[…]ramme – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/171 (20 October 2000).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Internationally Agreed Definitions of Environmental Labelling within the International Organization for Standardization[…]rk – Communication from the ISO, WT/CTE/W/114 (31 May 1999).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 2 May 2007 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/44 (13 June 2007).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 3 November 2008 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/46 (12 January 2009).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 16 October 2013 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/56 (31 January 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 6 July 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/52 (6 September 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 22 June 2015 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/59 (3 September 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 29 September 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/50 (2 November 2010).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 27–28 June 2001 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/27 (8 August 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 20 April 2004 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/36 (19 May 2004).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 20 April 2004 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/34 (29 July 2003).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 14 November 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/53 (27 January 2012).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 9 November 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/51 (31 May 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 30 June 2014 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/57 (30 September 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report to the 5th Session of the Ministerial Conference in Cancún – Paragraphs 32 and 33 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration, WT/CTE/8 (11 July 2013).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Compilation of Submissions under Paragraph 31(i) of the Doha Declaration – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, TN/TE/S/3/Rev.1 (24 April 2003).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) and WTO Rules; Proposals Made in the Committee on Trade […] 2002 – Note by the Secretariat, TN/TE/S/1 (23 May 2002).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Manuel A. J. Teehankee, to the Trade Negotiations Committee, TN/TE/20 (21 April 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Summary Report of the Information Session on Product Carbon Footprint and Labelling Schemes – 17 February 2010 – Note by the Secretariat – Addendum, WT/CTE/M/49/Add.1 (28 May 2010).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Taxes and Charges for Environmental Purposes – Border Tax Adjustment – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/47 (2 May 1997).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Minutes of the Meeting Held on 16 April 2015, G/TRIMS/M/38 (27 July 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Minutes of the Meeting Held on 30 September and 1 November 1996, G/TRIMS/M/5 (27 November 1996).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Minutes of the Meeting Held on 4 October 2013, G/TRIMS/M/35 (20 December 2013).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Minutes of the Meeting Held on 4 October 2013, G/TRIMS/M/35 (20 December 2013).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Minutes of the Meeting Held on 8 October 2014, G/TRIMS/M/37 (21 November 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Minutes of the Special Meeting Held on 1 October 2012 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TRIMS/M/33 (22 November 2012).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Notification under Article 5.1 of the Agreement on TRIMs – Dominican Republic, G/TRIMS/N/1/DOM/1 (10 May 1995).Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TRIMs – Notification under Article 5.1 of the Agreement on TRIMs – Thailand, G/TRIMS/N/1/THA/1 (28 April 1995).Google Scholar

WTO, Côte d’Ivoire – Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/23 (15 April 1994).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Goods – TRIMs and Other Performance Requirements – Joint Study by the WTO and UNCTAD Secretariats – Part II – Addendum, G/C/W/307/Add.1 (8 February 2002).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Goods – Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Information Provided to the General Council, G/C/W/158 (26 July 1999).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Goods – Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Report by the Chairperson of the Council for Trade in Goods to the General Council, G/C/59 (21 July 2017).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Audiovisual Services – Background Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/310 (12 January 2010).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Communication by the US – Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, S/C/W/359 (17 December 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Report of the Meeting Held on 18 March 2015 – Note by the Secretariat, S/C/M/122 (1 May 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Submission by the Delegation of Uganda on behalf of the LDC Group – Collective Request Pursuant to the Bali Decision on the o[…]rs of LDCs, S/C/W/356 (23 July 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – The Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/68 (16 November 1998).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Interim Report to the General Council, S/C/8 (31 March 1999).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Report by the Chairman of the Council for Trade in Services to the General Council, S/C/52 (19 July 2017).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health […] – Note by the Secretariat, IP/C/W/387 (24 October 2002).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – The Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Background Note by the Secretariat, IP/C/W/128 (10 February 1999).Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – The Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Background Note by the Secretariat – Addendum, IP/C/W/128/Add.1 (15 May 2003).Google Scholar

WTO, Decision-Making Procedures under Articles IX and XII of the WTO Agreement – Statement by the Chairman – As Agreed by the General Council on 15 November 1995, WT/L/93 (24 November 1995).Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – 7 December 2016 – Item – Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Review of Progress – Report by the Chairman, WT/GC/W/728 (8 December 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Article 27.4 of the SCM Agreement – Decision of 27 July 2007, WT/L/691 (31 July 2007).Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Minutes of the Meeting – Held in the Center William Rappard on 21 October 2014, WT/GC/M/153 (2 December 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Transparency Mechanism for Regional Trade Agreements – Decision of 14 December 2006, WT/L/671 (18 December 2006).Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – WTO Agreements and Electronic Commerce, WT/GC/W/90 (14 July 1998).Google Scholar

WTO, Israel – Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/44 (15 April 1994).Google Scholar

WTO, Mexico – Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/56 (15 April 1994).Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Fourth Session – Doha, 9–13 November 2001 – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, WT/MIN(01)/4 (11 November 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Fourth Session – Doha, 9–13 November 2001 – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China, WT/MIN(01)/3 (10 November 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Fourth Session – Doha, 9–14 November 2001 – Ministerial Declaration – Adopted on 14 November 2001, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 (20 November 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Ninth Session – Bali, 3–6 December 2013 – Monitoring Mechanism on S&D Treatment – Ministerial Decision of 7 December 2013, WT/MIN(13)/45, WT/L/920 (11 December 2013).Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Sixth Session – Hong Kong, 13–18 December 2005 – Doha Work Programme – Ministerial Declaration – Adopted on 18 December 2005, WT/MIN(05)/DEC (22 December 2005).Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Tenth Session – Nairobi, 15–18 December 2015 – Implementation of Preferential Treatment in Favour of Services and Service Supplier[…]al Decision of 19 December 2015, WT/MIN(15)/48, WT/L/982 (21 December 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Tenth Session – Nairobi, 15–18 December 2015 – Export Competition – Ministerial Decision of 19 December 2015, WT/MIN(15)/45, WT/L/980 (21 December 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Preferential Treatment to Services and Service Suppliers of LDCs – Decision of 17 December 2011, WT/L/847 (19 December 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Report (2008) of the Committee on TRIMs, G/L/860 (29 October 2008).Google Scholar

WTO, Technical Note on the Accession Process – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, WT/ACC/7/Rev.2 (1 November 2000).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – 1 and 3 December 2010 – TPR – Hong Kong, China – Record of the Meeting, WT/TPR/M/241/Add.1 (10 February 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – 13 and 15 May 2013 – TPR – Macao, China – Record of the Meeting – Addendum, WT/TPR/M/281/Add.1 (18 September 2013).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – 27 and 29 March 2012 – TPR – UAE – Record of the Meeting, WT/TPR/M/262 (9 May 2012).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – 28 and 30 November 2011 – TPR – Thailand – Record of the Meeting, WT/TPR/M/255 (30 January 2012).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – TPR – Report by the Secretariat – Brazil, WT/TPR/S/358 (12 June 2017).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – TPR – Report by the Secretariat – Indonesia – Revision, WT/TPR/S/278/Rev.1 (16 July 2013).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – TPR – Report by the Secretariat – Kyrgyz Republic – Revision, WT/TPR/S/170/Rev.1 (12 January 2007).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – TPR – Report by the Secretariat – Panama – Revision, WT/TPR/S/186/Rev.1 (3 December 2007).Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – TPR – Report by the Secretariat – Republic of Korea – Revision, WT/TPR/S/204/Rev.1 (4 December 2008).Google Scholar

WTO, Trade in Services – Guidelines for the Scheduling of Specific Commitments under the GATS – Adopted by the Council for Trade in Services on 23 March 2001, S/L/92 (28 March 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Trade in Services – Russian Federation – Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/149 (5 November 2012).Google Scholar

WTO, Trade in Services – The Republic of Kazakhstan – Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/154 (15 February 2016).Google Scholar

WTO, Work Programme on Electronic Commerce – Adopted by the General Council on 25 September 1998, WT/L/274 (30 September 1998).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on GATS Rules – Subsidies for Services Sectors – Information Contained in WTO TPRs – Background Note by the Secretariat – Revision, S/WPGR/W/25/Add.7/Rev.1 (13 January 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of Armenia – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Armenia, WT/ACC/ARM/23 (26 November 2002).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of China – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China, WT/ACC/CHN/49 (1 October 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of China – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China – Schedule CLII – The People’s Republic of China – Part II –[…]le II MFN Exemptions – Addendum, WT/ACC/CHN/49/Add.2 (1 October 2001).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of Saudi Arabia – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the WTO, WT/ACC/SAU/61 (1 November 2005).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, WT/ACC/807/27 (26 September 2002).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Kazakhstan, WT/ACC/KAZ/93 (23 June 2015).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Seychelles – Accession of Seychelles – Draft Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Seychelles – Revision, WT/ACC/SPEC/SYC/6/Rev.2 (16 September 2014).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Tajikistan – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Tajikistan, WT/ACC/TJK/30 (6 November 2012).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of the Russian Federation – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Russian Federation to the WTO, WT/ACC/RUS/70, WT/MIN(11)/2 (17 November 2011).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of Ukraine – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Ukraine to the WTO, WT/ACC/UKR/152 (25 January 2008).Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on the Accession of Viet Nam – Accession of Viet Nam – Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Viet Nam, WT/ACC/VNM/48 (27 October 2006).Google Scholar

Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha, The WTO, the Internet and Trade in Digital Products: EC–US Perspectives (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

Yao, Daqing and Whalley, John, “The China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone: Background, Developments and Preliminary Assessment of Initial Impacts,” 39 The World Economy 2 (2016).Google Scholar

Yoo, Ji Yeong and Ahn, Dukgeun, “Security Exceptions in the WTO System: Bridge or Bottle-Neck for Trade and Security?,” 19 Journal of International Economic Law 417 (2016).Google Scholar