Abraham, A. (2013). The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abraham, A. (2014). Creative thinking as orchestrated by semantic processing versus cognitive control brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Schweckendiek, J., … Hermann, C. (2012). Creativity and the brain: Uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1906–1917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Musicaro, R., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations. Memory, 24, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anaki, D., & Henik, A. (2003). Is there a “strength effect” in automatic semantic priming? Memory & Cognition, 31, 262–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Saxe, R., & Yarkoni, T. (2014). Contributions of episodic retrieval and mentalizing to autobiographical thought: Evidence from functional neuroimaging, resting-state connectivity, and fMRI meta-analyses. NeuroImage, 91, 324–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014). The default network and self-generated thought: Component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316, 29–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arden, R. Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioral Brain Research, 214, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baronchelli, A., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Pastor-Satorras, R., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2013). Networks in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 348–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought. Thinking & Reasoning, 21, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5, 10964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beaty, R. E., Kaufman, S. B., Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Jauk, E., … Silvia, P. J. (2016). Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 773–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative over time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M., Konen, T., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D. U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424, 175–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Arenas, A. (2010). Semantic networks: Structure and dynamics. Entropy, 12, 1264–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). One hundred forty-four Compound Remote Associate Problems: Short insight-like problems with one-word solutions. Behavioral Research, Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budson, A. E., & Price, B. H. (2005). Memory dysfunction. New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 692–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). Network structure influences speech production. Cognitive Science, 34, 685–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2002). Three-step priming in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 30, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coane, J. H., & Balota, D. A. (2011). Face (and nose) priming for book: The malleability of semantic memory. Experimental Psychology, 58, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Deyne, S., Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Navarro, D. J. (2016). Large-scale network representations of semantics in the mental lexicon. In Jones, M. N. (Ed.), Big data in cognitive science: From methods to insights (pp. 174–202). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

De Deyne, S., Navarro, D. J., & Storms, G. (2013). Associative strength and semantic activation in the mental lexicon: evidence from continued word associations. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar

De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008). Word association: Network and semantic properties. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 213–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., & Storms, G. (2016). Structure and organization of the mental lexicon: A network approach derived from syntactic dependency relations and word associations. In Mehler, A., Blanchard, P., Job, B., & Banish, S. (Eds.), Towards a theoretical framework for analyzing complex linguistic networks (pp. 47–79). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Den-Heyer, K., & Briand, K. (1986). Priming single digit numbers: Automatic spreading activation dissipates as a function of semantic distance. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, S. (2007). How to use the LSA website. In Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 57–70). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Faust, M. (2012). Thinking outside the left box: The role of the right hemisphere in novel metaphor comprehension. In Faust, M. (Ed.), Advances in the neural substrates of language: Toward a synthesis of basic science and clinical research (pp. 425–448). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Forthmann, B., Gerwig, A., Holling, H., Çelik, P., Storme, , , M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The be-creative effect in divergent thinking: The interplay of instruction and object frequency. Intelligence, 57, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the “neurds”: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, A. E. (2016). Creativity, within reason: Semantic distance and dynamic state creativity in relational thinking and reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, A. E., Cohen, M. S., Raab, H. A., Yedibalian, C. G., & Gray, J. R. (2015). Frontopolar activity and connectivity support dynamic conscious augmentation of creative state. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 923–934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J. M., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2010). Connecting long distance: Semantic distance in analogical reasoning modulates frontopolar cortex activity. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J. M., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 264–272.Google ScholarPubMed

Green, A. E., Spiegel, K. A., Giangrande, E. J., Weinberger, A. B., Gallagher, N. M., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2017). Thinking cap plus thinking zap: tDCS of frontopolar cortex improves creative analogical reasoning and facilitates conscious augmentation of state creativity in verb generation. Cerebral Cortex, 27, 2628–2639.Google ScholarPubMed

Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Firl, A. (2007). Google and the mind: Predicting fluency with PageRank. Psychological Science, 18, 1069–1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gruszka, A., & Necka, E. (2002). Priming and acceptance of close and remote associations by creative and less creative people. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, L. W. (2008). Overcoming the limitations of single-response free associations. Electronic Journal of Integrative Biosciences, 5, 25–36.Google Scholar

Hass, R. W. (2016). Conceptual Expansion During Divergent Thinking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). When does semantic similarity help episodic retrieval? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Predicting semantic priming at the item level. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1036–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, M. N., Willits, J., & Dennis, S. (2015). Models of semantic memory. In Busemeyer, J. & Townsend, J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of mathematical and computational psychology (pp. 232–254). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E., Mead, B. S., Carrasco, J., & Flores, R. A. (2013). The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kajić, I., Gosmann, , Stewart, J., Wennekers, T. C., , T., & Eliasmith, C. (2016). Towards a cognitively realistic representation of word associations. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Kajić, I., & Wennekers, T. (2015). Neural network model of semantic processing in the remote associates test. Paper presented at the Workshop on Cognitive Computation: Integrating Neural and Symbolic Approaches, 29th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2015), Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kenett, Y. N., Levi, E., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2017). The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. doi:10.1037/xlm0000391.Google ScholarPubMed

Kenett, Y. N., Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2016). Structure and flexibility: Investigating the relation between the structure of the mental lexicon, fluid intelligence, and creative achievement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenett, Y. N., Kenett, D. Y., Ben-Jacob, E., & Faust, M. (2011). Global and local features of semantic networks: Evidence from the Hebrew mental lexicon. PLoS ONE, 6, e23912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kim, H. (2016). Default network activation during episodic and semantic memory retrieval: A selective meta-analytic comparison. Neuropsychologia, 80, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kröger, S., Rutter, , Hill, B., Windmann, H., Hermann, S., , C., & Abraham, A. (2013). An ERP study of passive creative conceptual expansion using a modified alternate uses task. Brain Research, 1527, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kröger, S., Rutter, , Stark, B., Windmann, R., Hermann, S., , C., & Abraham, A. (2012). Using a shoe as a plant pot: Neural correlates of passive conceptual expansion. Brain Research, 1430, 52–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41, 306–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madore, K. P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Creativity and memory: Effects of an episodic-specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science, 26, 1461–1468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1623–1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mayseless, N., Eran, A., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2015). Generating original ideas: The neural underpinning of originality. NeuroImage, 116, 232–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McRae, K., & Jones, M. N. (2013). Semantic memory. In Reisberg, D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 206–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mednick, M. T., Mednick, S. A., & Jung, C. C. (1964). Continual association as a function of level of creativity and type of verbal stimulus. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mendelsohn, G. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance 1. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Dennis, S. (2000). What is free association and what does it measure? Memory & Cognition, 28, 887–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olteţeanu, A.-M., & Falomir, Z. (2015). comRAT-C: A computational compound Remote Associates Test solver based on language data and its comparison to human performance. Pattern Recognition Letters, 67, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olteţeanu, A.-M., & Falomir, Z. (2016). Object replacement and object composition in a creative cognitive system. Towards a computational solver of the Alternative Uses Test. Cognitive Systems Research, 39, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 976–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prabhakaran, R., Green, A. E., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Thin slices of creativity: Using single-word utterances to assess creative cognition. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Radel, R., Davranche, K., Fournier, M., & Dietrich, A. (2015). The role of (dis)inhibition in creativity: Decreased inhibition improves idea generation. Cognition, 134, 110–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Recchia, G., & Jones, M. (2009). More data trumps smarter algorithms: Comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rossman, E., & Fink, A. (2010). Do creative people use shorter association pathways? Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 891–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubinsten, O., Anaki, D., Henik, A., Drori, S., & Farn, I. (2005). Norms to free associations in Hebrew. In Henik, A., Rubinsten, O., & Anaki, D. (Eds.), Word norms in Hebrew (pp. 17–35). Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Hill, , Windmann, H., Hermann, S., , C., & Abraham, A. (2012). Can clouds dance? Part 2: An ERP investigation of passive conceptual expansion. Brain and Cognition, 80, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Stark, , Schweckendiek, R., Windmann, J., Hermann, S., , C., & Abraham, A. (2012). Can clouds dance? Neural correlates of passive conceptual expansion using a metaphor processing task: Implications for creative cognition. Brain and Cognition, 78, 114–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schilling, M. A. (2005). A “small-world” network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapira-Lichter, I., Oren, N., Jacob, Y., Gruberger, M., & Hendler, T. (2013). Portraying the unique contribution of the default mode network to internally driven mnemonic processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 4950–4955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013). Verbal fluency and creativity: General and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking. Intelligence, 41, 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, S., & Estes, Z. (2006). Using latent semantic analysis to estimate similarity. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 190–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonton, D. K. (2013). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why creativity is inversely related to sightedness. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2015). On praising convergent thinking: Creativity as blind variation and selective retention. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2012). Cognition and the creation of ideas. In Holyoak, K. M., & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 456–474). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sowden, P. T., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2014). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 21, 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steyvers, M., Shiffrin, R. M., & Nelson, D. L. (2004). Word association spaces for predicting semantic similarity effects in episodic memory. In Healy, A. F. (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festchrift in honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer (pp. 237–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analysis and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Petten, C. (2014). Examining the N400 semantic context effect item-by-item: Relationship to corpus-based measures of word co-occurrence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vitevitch, M. S. (2008). What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 51, 408–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vitevitch, M. S., Chan, K. Y., & Goldstein, R. (2014). Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vitevitch, M. S., Chan, K. Y., & Roodenrys, S. (2012). Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 30–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wirth, M., Jann, K., Dierks, T., Federspiel, A., Wiest, R., & Horn, H. (2011). Semantic memory involvement in the default mode network: A functional neuroimaging study using independent component analysis. NeuroImage, 54, 3057–3066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zabelina, D. L., Saporta, A., & Beeman, M. (2015). Flexible or leaky attention in creative people? Distinct patterns of attention for different types of creative thinking. Memory & Cognition, 44, 488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar