Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:56:00.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Mouse Embryo Assay for Quality Control in the IVF Laboratory

from Section 1 - Starting a New Laboratory and Training Protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Markus H. M. Montag
Affiliation:
ilabcomm GmbH, St Augustin, Germany
Dean E. Morbeck
Affiliation:
Fertility Associates, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Principles of IVF Laboratory Practice
Optimizing Performance and Outcomes
, pp. 69 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bavister, B. D. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts.Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1(2):91148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leese, H. J. Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Human Reproduction Update 1995; 1:6372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Punt–van der Zalm, J. P. E. M., Hendriks, J. C. M., Westphal, J. R., Kremer, J. A. M., Teerenstra, S. et al. Toxicity testing of human assisted reproduction devices using the mouse embryo assay. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2009; 18(4):529–35.Google Scholar
Bavister, B. and Andrews, J. C. A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality control testing of water and culture media. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1988; 5:6775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critchlow, J. D., Matson, P. L., Newman, M. C. et al. Quality control in an in-vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. Hum Reprod 1989; 4:545–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stovall, D. W., Guzick, D. S., Berga, S. L. et al. Sperm recovery and survival: two tests that predict in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1994; 62:1244–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, J. G. and Storey, B. T. Spontaneous lipid peroxidation in rabbit and mouse epididymal spermatozoa: dependence of rate on temperature and oxygen concentration. Biol Reprod 1985; 32:342–51.Google Scholar
Claassens, O. E., Wehr, J. B. and Harrison, K. L. Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1586–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, M. and Gardner, DK. Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 109:153–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, A., Vermesh, M., Lobo, R. and Paulson, R. Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, L. F., Sundaram, S. G. and Smith, S. The relevance and use of mouse embryo bioassays for quality control in an assisted reproductive technology program. Fertil Steril 1993; 60:559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. M., Morbeck, D. E., Hudson, S., Fredrickson, J., Walker, D. L. et al. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standard quality control assays. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27:8792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morbeck, D.E., Khan, Z., Barnidge, D. R. and Walker, D. L. Washing mineral oil reduces contaminants and embryotoxicity. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, O., Asano, T., Yamamoto, Y., Takano, K. and Koura, M. Development in vitro of preimplantation embryos from 55 mouse strains. Reprod Fertil Dev 1996; 8:975–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, Z., Morbeck, D. E., Walker, D. L. et al. Mouse embryos and in vitro stress: does mouse strain matter? Fertil Steril 2010; 94:S58.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. K., Reed, L., Linck, D., Sheehan, C. and Lane, M. Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med 2005; 23(4):319–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolff, H. S., Fredrickson, J. R., Walker, D. L. and Morbeck, D. E. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(7):1776–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×