Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T00:03:19.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Festina Lente or Disguised Protectionism: Monopoly and Competition in the Indian Legal Profession

from Section IV - Regulation and Foreign Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2017

David B. Wilkins
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
Vikramaditya S. Khanna
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Law School
David M. Trubek
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Indian Legal Profession in the Age of Globalization
The Rise of the Corporate Legal Sector and its Impact on Lawyers and Society
, pp. 395 - 416
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aeltemesh Rein v. Union of India 1988 4 SCC 54.Google Scholar
A. K. Balaji v. The Government of India 2010 WP No. 5614.Google Scholar
A. K. Roy v. Union of India 1982 1 SCC 271.Google Scholar
Basu, Nayanima. 2015. “Government Mulls Legal Services’ Liberalisation.” Business Standard. www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/government-mulls-legal-services-liberalisation-115062900875_1.html.Google Scholar
Bhasin, Lalit. 2011. Speech (Globalization, Lawyers and Emerging Economies conference, New Delhi, October 9).Google Scholar
Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College, Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) no(s). 22337/2008 WP no. 13698/2007.Google Scholar
Chauhan, Neha. 2010. “Supreme Court Doesn't Want to Hear Bar Exam Cases, to Move into Delhi HC.” Legally India. www.legallyindia.com/201008021165/Law-schools/supreme-court-doesnt-want-to-hear-bar-exam-cases-to-move-into-delhi-hc.Google Scholar
Das, Gurcharan. 2002. India Unbound: The Social and Economic Revolution from Independence to the Global Information Age. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2010. “Law and Globalisation: Not Entirely Free, Your Honour.” www.economist.com/node/16693882?story_id=16693882&CFID=134992265&CFTOKEN=66996759.Google Scholar
Ganz, Kian. 2010. “Law Firms Can't Agree on LLP Conversion as Trilegal Waits for BCI Clarification.” Legally India. www.legallyindia.com/201008061179/Law-firms/law-firms-cant-agree-on-llp-conversion-as-trilegal-waits-for-bci-clarification.Google Scholar
Ganz, Kian. 2011. “Law Firm Scraps LLP After Illegal Threats from Delhi Bar Council Chairman.” Legally India. www.legallyindia.com/201112092439/Law-firms/law-firm-scraps-llp-after-illegal-threats-from-delhi-bar-council-chairman.Google Scholar
Ganz, Kian. 2013. “Of Paid News, ‘Leading Players’ and ‘Editorial Content’: How Indian Law Firms Advertise.” Legally India. www.legallyindia.com/201308223927/Legal-opinions/of-paid-news-leading-players-and-editorial-content-how-indian-law-firms-advertise.Google Scholar
Kanekal, Nikhil and Ganz, Kian. 2012. Live Mint. “Bar Council May Appeal HC ruling.” www.livemint.com/2012/02/24002628/Bar-Council-may-appeal-HC-ruli.html.Google Scholar
Lawyers Collective v. Bar Council of India 1995 WP no. 1526.Google Scholar
Lawyers Weekly. 2011. “Commission Says Law Firms Should Be Able to Advertise.” www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/7877-commission-says-law-firms-should-be-able-to-advert.Google Scholar
M.P. Electricity Board v. Shiv Narayan 2005 7 SCC 283.Google Scholar
Nanda, Prashant K. and Kanekal, Nikhil. 2012. “BCI Retains Sway Over Legal Education. Live Mint. www.livemint.com/Politics/JRTIKumDKOhE72OAkdlqyI/BCI-retains-sway-over-legal-education.html.Google Scholar
Nariman, Fali. 2010. Before Memory Fades: An Autobiography. New Delhi: Hay House India.Google Scholar
Rahul Singh v. Union of India 2010 Wri C. no. 36296.Google Scholar
V. Sudeer v. Bar Council of India 1999 3 SCC 176: AIR 1999 SC 1167.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×