Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:19:40.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - An Inherent Complexity

Projects and Organizations

from Part IV - New Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

Shankar Sankaran
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Ralf Müller
Affiliation:
BI Norwegian Business School
Nathalie Drouin
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, F., Eden, C., & Williams, T. (1997). Modelling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Interfaces, 27(2), 4865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. (1999), Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. R. (1945). The effects of controls on stability. Natura, 155, 242243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. R. (1956). Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T., 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 311(3), 590614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. H. (2009) Nonknowledge: The bibliographical organization of ignorance, stupidity, error, and unreason: Part one. Knowledge Organization 36(1), 1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial System. Santa Fe Institute’s Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. New York: Santa Fe Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B. K. & Fulk, J. (1996). Executive scanning and perceived uncertainty: a multidimensional model. Journal of Management, 22(1), 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D., Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J. (2007). Making sense of sensemaking narratives. Human Relations, 61(8), 10351062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. (1998). Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Burnes, B. (2004) Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics, 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, R. E. (2005). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. San Francisco, CA: The Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (2002). Brain-wise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
City of Sydney (2015) Sydney New Year’s Eve service review report. V.2.0 Sydney Australia.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. & Eliasmith, C. (2002). Philosophical issues in brain theory and connectionism. In Arbib, M. A. (Ed.), The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clift, T. & Vandenbosch, M. (1999). Project complexity and efforts to reduce product development cycle time. Journal of Business Research, 45(2), 187198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, L., Cooke-Davies, T., Hobbs, B., Labuschagne, L., Remington, K., & Chen, P. (2008). Situational sponsorship of projects and programs: An empirical review. Pennsylvania, United States: Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
Disterer, G. (2002). Management of project knowledge and experiences. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 512520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBrin, A. (2009). Political Behavior in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1991). The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process. Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, 2nd ed., 1994. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. & Shpielberg, N. (2003). Organizational learning mechanisms and managers’ perceived uncertainty. Human Relations, 56(10), 12331254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B, Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk. An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordor, J., de Baets, B., & Perny, . (2000). Preferences and Decisions under Incomplete Knowledge. New York: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, J. W. (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, and future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 445466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, J. W. & Mitchell, T. R. (1984). Strategic decision processes: comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 399423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girmscheid, G. & Brockman, C. (2008). The inherent complexity of large scale engineering projects. Project perspectives. The annual publication of International Project Management Association, pp. 2226.Google Scholar
Gleick, J. (1993). Chaos. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Halligan, J. (2007). Accountability in Australia: Control, paradox, and complexity. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(3/4), 453479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, R J., Edwards, J S., Tapinos, E. (2012) Examining the strategy development process through the lens of complex adaptive systems theory. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(7), 909919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, G. M., Novicevic, M. M., Buckley, M. R., et al. (2001). A historical perspective on organizational ignorance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(6), 449468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C. (2001). Some phenomena of problem decomposition in strategy for design thinking. Design Studies, 22, 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, B. and Miller, R. (2002) “The Strategic Front End of Large Infrastructure Projects: A Process of Nesting Governance,” Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference, Seattle, USA, pp 1417.Google Scholar
Hock, D. (2005). One from Many: VISA and the Rise of Chaordic Organization. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading: Helix Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, O. & Melhuish, C. (1999). Stigmergy, self-organization and sorting in collective robotics. Artificial Life, 5(2), 173202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hovarth, D., Macmillan, C. J., Azumi, K., & Hickson, D. J. (1981). The cultural context of organization control: an international comparison. In Hickson, D. J. & Macmillan, C.J. (Eds.), Organization and Nation: The Aston Program, Vol. 4, 173183. Aldershot, UK: Gower.Google Scholar
Introna, L. (1997). Management, Information and Power: A Narrative of the Involved Manager. London, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B., & Lam, S. (2010). Self-organization, natural selection, and evolution: Cellular hardware and genetic software. Bioscience, 60(11), 879885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S.A. (1995). At Home in the, Universe: the Search for the Laws of Self-organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiel, L. D. (1994). Managing Chaos and Complexity in Government: A New Paradigm for Managing Change, Innovation, and Organizational Renewal. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kurchner-Hawkins, R. & Miller, R. (2006). Organizational politics: Building positive political strategies in turbulent times. In Vigoda-Gadot, P. Eran & Drory, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Politics, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 328352.Google Scholar
Lloyd, R. (2008) Promoting global accountability: The experiences of the Global Accountability Project. Global Governance, 14(3), 273281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, R. (1999), The Edge of Organisation: Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maytorena, E. & Winch, G. (2010). Exploring Project Managers’ Mental Models of Project Risks. Manchester, UK: Manchester Business School.Google Scholar
Müller, R. & Geraldi, J. G. (2007). Linking complexity and leadership competences of Project Managers. IRNOP VIII Conference (International Research Network for Organizing by Projects). Conference papers. Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulous, T. & Merali, Y (2008). Stakeholder network dynamics and emergent trajectories of lean implementation projects: A study in the UK National Health Service. Public Money and Management, 28(1), 4148.Google Scholar
Peterson, D., Silsbee, D., & Schmoldt, D. (1994). A case study of resources management planning with multiple objectives and projects. Environmental Management, 18(5), 729742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stace, W. T. & Goldstein, J. A. (2006). Novelty, indeterminism and emergence. Complexity & Organization, 8(2), 7795.Google Scholar
Pollack, J. (2013). Pluralist project research: Drawing on critical systems thinking to manage research across paradigms. In Drouin, N., Müller, R., & Sankaran, S. (Eds.), Novel Approaches to Organizational Project Management Research: Translational and Transformational, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Pryke, S. & Smyth, H. (2006). The Management of Complex Projects: A Relationship Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Radin, B. (2006). Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Remington, K. & Pollack, J. (2007). Tools for Complex Projects. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
Schindler, M. & Eppler, M. J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: a review of project learning methods and success factors, International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 219228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 100111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderlund, J. (2002). Managing complex development projects: Arenas, knowledge processes and time. R&D Management, 32(5), 419430.Google Scholar
Stacey, R. (2007). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity to Ways of Thinking About Organisations. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Stacey, R. (2012). Tools and Techniques of Leadership and Management. Managing the Challenge of Complexity. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Styhre, A., Wikmalm, L., Olilla, S., & Roth, J. (2010). Garbage-can decision making and the accommodation of uncertainty in new drug development work. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 134146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (2005). Leadership and cult values: moving from the idealized to the experienced. In Griffin, D. & Stacey, R. (Eds.), Complexity and the Experience of Leading Organizations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. & Hirst, J. (2001). Facilitating effective change and continuous improvement: The Mortgage Express way. Journal of Change Management, 2(1), 6771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M. & Marion, R. (Eds.) (2008). Complexity Leadership: Part 1. Conceptual Foundations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Vigoda-Gadot, E. & Drory, A. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of Organizational Politics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T. (1999). The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 17, 269273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T. (2002). Modelling Complex Projects. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Williams, T. (2004). Why Monte Carlo simulations of project networks can mislead. Project Management Journal, 25(3), 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×