Andersen, A. N. (2000). A global ecology of rainforest ants: functional groups in relation to environmental stress and disturbance. In Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity, ed. Agosti, D., Majer, J. D., Alonso, L. E. & Schultz, T. R.: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J., Aizen, M., Fontaine, C. et al. (2010). Symposium 6: mutualistic networks. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 91(3), 367–370.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J. & Olesen, J. M. (2003). The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 9383–9387.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J. M. (2006). Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312, 431–433.Google Scholar

Bentley, B. L. (1976). Plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and the associated ant community: Interhabitat differences in the reduction of herbivore damage. Ecology 57, 815–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blüthgen, N., Verhaagh, M., Goitía, W. et al. (2000). How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125(2), 229–240.Google Scholar

Campos-Navarrete, M. J., Abdala-Roberts, L., Munguía-Rosas, M. A. & Parra-Tabla, V. (2015). Are tree species diversity and genotypic diversity effects on insect herbivores mediated by ants? PloS One 10(8): e0132671.Google Scholar

Chavarro-Rodríguez, N., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. (2013). Characterization and functional ecology of the extrafloral nectar of Cedrela odorata in contrasting growth environments in central Veracruz, Mexico. Botany 91, 695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuautle, M. & Rico-Gray, V. (2003). The effect of wasps and ants on the reproductive success of the extrafloral nectaried plant. Turnera ulmifolia Turneraceae. Functional Ecology, 17, 417–423.Google Scholar

Dáttilo, W., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014a). Ant dominance hierarchy determines the nested pattern in ant-plant networks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 113, 405–414.Google Scholar

Dáttilo, W., Fagundes, R., Gurka, C. A. Q. et al. (2014b). Individual-based ant-plant networks: diurnal-nocturnal structure and species-area relationship. PLoS One 9(6), e99838.Google Scholar

Dáttilo, W., Guimarães, P. R., & Izzo, T. J. (2013a). Spatial structure of ant–plant mutualistic networks. Oikos, 122, 1643–1648.Google Scholar

Dáttilo, W., Marquitti, F. M. D., Guimarães, P. R. & Izzo, T. J. (2014c). The structure of ant-plant ecological networks: is abundance enough?. Ecology 95, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dáttilo, W., Rico-Gray, V., Rodrigues, D. J. & Izzo, T. J. (2013b). Soil and vegetation features determine the nested pattern of ant-plant networks in a tropical rainforest. Ecological Entomology 38, 374–380.Google Scholar

Del-Claro, K., Rico-Gray, V., Torezan-Silingardi, H. M. et al. (2016). Loss and gains in ant–plant interactions mediated by extrafloral nectar: fidelity, cheats, and lies. Insectes Sociaux 63(2), 207–221.Google Scholar

Díaz-Castelazo, C., Guimarães, P., Jordano, P. et al. (2010). Changes of a mutualistic network over time: reanalysis over a 10-year period. Ecology 91(3), 793–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Díaz-Castelazo, C., Rico-Gray, V., Oliveira, P. S. & Cuautle, M. (2004). Extrafloral nectary-mediated ant–plant interactions in the coastal vegetation of Veracruz, Mexico: richness, occurrence, seasonality and ant foraging patterns. Ecoscience 11, 472–481.Google Scholar

Díaz-Castelazo, C., Rico-Gray, V., Ortega, F. & Ángeles, G. (2005). Morphological and secretory characterization of extrafloral nectaries in plants of coastal Veracruz, Mexico. Annals of Botany 96(7), 1175–1189.Google Scholar

Díaz-Castelazo, C., Sánchez-Galván, I. R., Guimarães, P. R., Raimundo, R. L. G. & Rico-Gray, V. (2013). Long–term temporal variation in the organization of an ant-plant network. Annals of Botany 111, 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fernández-Martínez, M. J. & Díaz-Castelazo, C. (2009). Caracterización ecológica de Cedrela odorata y patrones de infestación por Hypsipyla grandella en selvas y plantaciones de Veracruz. In Serie memorias científicas 15. XXII Reunión científica Tecnológica Forestal y Agropecuarias, ed. INIFAP, Veracruz, México, pp. 301–310.Google Scholar

Guimarães, P. R. Jr., Rico-Gray, V., Oliveira, P. S. et al. (2007). Interaction intimacy affects structure and coevolutionary dynamics in mutualistic networks. Current Biology 17, 1797–1803.Google Scholar

Heil, M. (2015). Extrafloral nectar at the plant-insect interface: a spotlight on chemical ecology, phenotypic plasticity, and food webs. Annual Review of Entomology 60, 213–232.Google Scholar

Hernández-Villanueva, M. A. (2010). Interacción insecto planta mediada por nectarios extraflorales del cedro rojo (Cedrela odorata, Meliaceae) en selvas y plantaciones del centro de Veracruz. BSc thesis, Benemérita Universidad de Puebla. Puebla, México.Google Scholar

Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., & Olesen, J. M. (2003). Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant–animal interactions. Ecology Letters, 6, 69–81.Google Scholar

Kersch, M. F. & Fonseca, C. R. (2005). Abiotic factors and the conditional outcome of an ant–plant mutualism. Ecology 86(8), 2117–2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koptur, S. (2005). Nectar as fuel for plant protectors. In Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications, ed. Wäckers, F. L., van Rijn, P. C. J. & Bruin, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–108.Google Scholar

Koptur, S. & Lawton, J. H. (1988). Interactions among vetches bearing extrafloral nectaries, their biotic protective agents, and herbivores. Ecology 69, 278–293.Google Scholar

López-Carretero, A., Díaz-Castelazo, C., Boege, K. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014). Evaluating the spatio-temporal factors that structure network parameters of plant-herbivore interactions. PLoS One 9(10), e110430.Google Scholar

Ness, J. H. & Bronstein, J. L. (2004). The effects of invasive ants on prospective ant mutualists. Biological Invasions 6, 445–461.Google Scholar

Oliveira, P. S. & Freitas, A. V. L. (2004). Ant-plant-herbivore interactions in the neotropical cerrado savanna. Naturwissenschaften 91, 557–570.Google Scholar

Oliveira, P. S., Rico-Gray, V., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Castillo-Guevara, C. (1999). Interactions between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in neotropical coastal sand dunes: Herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Functional Ecology 13, 623–631.Google Scholar

Pacini, E. & Nepi, M. (2007). Nectar production and presentation. In Nectaries and nectar, ed. Nicolson, S. W., Nepi, M. & Pacini, E.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 167–214.Google Scholar

Pemberton, R. W. (1988). The abundance of plants bearing extrafloral nectaries in Colorado and Mojave desert communities of Southern California. Madroño 35(3), 238–246.Google Scholar

Pennington, T. D. & Sarukhán, J. (2005). Árboles tropicales de México: Manual para la identificación de las principales especies. 3rd ed. México, D. F. Fondo de cultura económica, UNAM.Google Scholar

Perfecto, I. (1990). Indirect and direct effects in a tropical agroecosystem: the maize-pest-ant system in Nicaragua. Ecology 71, 2125–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perfecto, I. (1991). Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as natural control agents of pests in irrigated maize in Nicaragua. Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 65–70.Google Scholar

Perfecto, I. & Sediles, A. (1992). Vegetational diversity, ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and herbivorous pests in a neotropical agroecosystem. Environmental Entomology 21, 61–67.Google Scholar

Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. H. (1994). Understanding biodiversity loss in agroecosystems: reduction of ant diversity resulting from transformation of the coffee ecosystem in Costa Rica. Entomological Trends in Agricultural Science 2, 7–13.Google Scholar

Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. H. (2002). Quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in southern Mexico. Conservation Biology 16, 174–182.Google Scholar

Philpott, S. M., Greenberg, R., Bichier, P. & Perfecto, I. (2004a). Impacts of major predators on tropical agroforest arthropods: comparisons within and across taxa. Oecologia 140, 140–149.Google Scholar

Philpott, S. M., Maldonado, J., Vandermeer, J. & Perfecto, I. (2004b). Taking trophic cascades up a level: behaviorally-modified effects of phorid flies on ants and ant prey in coffee agroecosystems. Oikos 105, 141–147.Google Scholar

Rico-Gray, V., Díaz-Castelazo, C., Ramírez-Hernández, A., Guimarães, P. R. Jr. & Holland, J. N. (2012). Abiotic factors shape temporal variation in the structure of a mutualistic ant-plant network. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 6, 189–295.Google Scholar

Rico-Gray, V., García-Franco, J. G., Palacios-Ríos, M. et al. (1998). Geographical and seasonal variation in the diversity of ant-plant association in Mexico. Biotropica 30, 190–200.Google Scholar

Rico-Gray, V. & Oliveira, P. S. (2007). The ecology and evolution of ant–plant interactions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rudgers, J. A. & Gardener, M. (2004). Extrafloral nectar as a resource mediating multispecies interactions. Ecology 85, 1495–1502.Google Scholar

Rudgers, J. A. & Strauss, S. Y. (2004). A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 271(1556), 2481–2488.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Galván, I. R., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. (2012). Effect of hurricane Karl on a plant–ant network occurring in coastal Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 28, 603–609.Google Scholar

Schupp, E. W. & Feener, D. H. (1991). Phylogeny, lifeform and habitat dependence of ant-defended plants in a Panamanian forest. In Ant-plant interactions, ed. Huxley, C. R. & Cutler, D. F., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–197.Google Scholar

van Rijn, P. C., & Sabelis, M. W. (2005). Impact of plant-provided food on herbivore-carnivore dynamics. In Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications, ed. F. L. Wäckers, P. C. J. van Rijn & J. Bruin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–266.Google Scholar

Waser, N. M. & Ollerton, J. (2006). Plant-pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Yamawo, A. & Hada, Y. (2010). Effects of light on direct and indirect defences against herbivores of young plants of Mallotus japonicus demonstrate a trade-off between two indirect defence traits. Annals of Botany, 106(1), 143–148.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, J. G. (1932). Uber die extrafloralen Nektarien der Angiospermen. Beihefte zum Botanischen Zentralblatt 49, 99–196.Google Scholar