Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:18:51.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prosection Techniques

from Section I - Techniques and Practical Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2021

Mirna Lechpammer
Affiliation:
New York University School of Medicine
Marc Del Bigio
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Rebecca Folkerth
Affiliation:
New York University School of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Cohen, MC, Scheimberg, I. The Pediatric and Perinatal Autopsy Manual: Cambridge University Press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert-Barness, E, Spicer, DE, Steffensen, TS. Handbook of Pediatric Autopsy Pathology, 2nd ed.: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
Khong, TY, Malcomson, RDG, editors. Keeling’s Fetal and Neonatal Pathology, 5th ed.: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
Collins, KA, Byard, RW, editors. Forensic Pathology of Infancy and Childhood: Springer; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlasyuk, VV. Features of opening the skull and extracting the brain from the skull. In: Vlasyuk, VV, editor. Birth Trauma and Perinatal Brain Damage: Springer; 2019. pp. 137–45.Google Scholar
Vlasyuk, VV. The method of opening the skull and extraction of the brain in fetuses and newborns. EC Neurology. 2018;10:6.Google Scholar
Giannini, C, Okazaki, H. Nervous system. In: Waters, BL, editor. Handbook of Autopsy Practice, 4th ed.: Humana Press / Springer; 2009. pp.5168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashmead, JW. Postmortem perinatal brain removal: the value of the posterior approach method. Pediatr Pathol. 1993;13(6):875–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prahlow, JA, Ross, KF, Salzberger, L, Lott, EG, Guileyardo, JM, Barnard, JJ. Immersion technique for brain removal in perinatal autopsies. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(5):1056–60.Google Scholar
Langley, FA. The perinatal postmortem examination. J Clin Pathol. 1971;24(2):159–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebire, NJ, Weber, MA, Thayyil, S, Mushtaq, I, Taylor, A, Chitty, LS. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(5):513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainwright, HC. My approach to performing a perinatal or neonatal autopsy. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(7):673–80.Google Scholar
Oehmichen, M, Auer, RN, König, HG. Forensic Neuropathology and Associated Neurology: Springer-Verlag; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarnat, HB, Flores-Sarnat, L, Trevenen, CL. Synaptophysin immunoreactivity in the human hippocampus and neocortex from 6 to 41 weeks of gestation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69(3):234–45.Google Scholar
Start, RD, Layton, CM, Cross, SS, Smith, JH. Reassessment of the rate of fixative diffusion. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45(12):1120–21.Google Scholar
Dawe, RJ, Bennett, DA, Schneider, JA, Vasireddi, SK, Arfanakis, K. Postmortem MRI of human brain hemispheres: T2 relaxation times during formaldehyde fixation. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(4):810–18.Google Scholar
Scott, IS, MacDonald, AW. An evaluation of overnight fixation to facilitate neuropathological examination in Coroner’s autopsies: our experience of over 200 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(1):50–3.Google Scholar
Adickes, ED, Folkerth, RD, Sims, KL. Use of perfusion fixation for improved neuropathologic examination. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121(11):1199–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharma, M, Grieve, JH. Rapid fixation of brains: a viable alternative? J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(4):393–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, C, Brett, F, Grehan, D, McDermott, MB. Heat-accelerated fixation and rapid dissection of the pediatric brain at autopsy: a pragmatic approach to the difficulties of organ retention. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;7(6):595600.Google Scholar
Bass, T, Bergevin, MA, Werner, AL, Liuzzi, FJ, Scott, DE. In situ fixation of the neonatal brain and spinal cord. Pediatr Pathol. 1993;13(5):699705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cimmino, A, Parisi, G, Mastropasqua, MG, Ricco, R. A new technique for foetal brain fixation and extraction. Pathologica. 2002;94(6):320–4.Google Scholar
Nicholls, JM. Rapid method for fetal brain fixation. J Clin Pathol. 1988;41(9):1019–20.Google Scholar

References

Judkins, AR, Hood, IG, Mirchandani, HG, Rorke, LB. Rationale and technique for examination of nervous system in suspected infant victims of abuse. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2004;25 (1):2932.Google Scholar
Peterson, JEG, Love, JC, Pinto, DC, Wolf, DA, Sandberg, G. A novel method for removing a spinal cord and attached cervical ganglia from a pediatric decedent. J Forensic Sci 2016:61;241–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, Z, Fowler, DR. En bloc examination of the neck in pediatric homicide cases: a proper way for complete assessment of neck trauma. Acad Forensic Pathol 2016:6;622–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

De Girolami, U, Frosch, M, Amato, AA. Biopsy of nerve and muscle. In Samuels, M, Feske, S (eds). Office Practice of Neurology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Harcourt Health Sciences, 2003, pp. 217–25.Google Scholar
Engel, AG. The muscle biopsy. In Engel, AG, Franzini-Armstrong, C (eds). Myology, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004, pp. 681–90.Google Scholar
Nix JS, Moore SA. What every neuropathologist needs to know: the muscle biopsy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 79:719–733, 2020.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S, Karpati, G. Pathology of Skeletal Muscle, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar

References

Lee, WR. “Autopsy eye” – the eye in systemic disease. In: Ophthalmic Histopathology. Springer, London. 2002; pp. 267–96.Google Scholar
Herwig-Carl, MC, Loeffler, KU, Müller, AM. Importance of investigation of fetal eyes: Supplement to fetal autopsy. [German] Pathologe. 2017;38(4):231–40.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×