Book contents
- The Jewish Family
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Judaism
- The Jewish Family
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Regulating Marital Relations between Spouses by Consent
- 2 “Freedom of Contract” in Jewish Family Law – The Differences between the Babylonian and Palestinian Talmuds
- 3 Is There Really No Conditional Marriage?
- 4 Temporary Marriage – A Possible Solution to the Problem of the Agunah?
- 5 Toward Establishing Halakhic Parenthood by Agreement?
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2017
Book contents
- The Jewish Family
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Judaism
- The Jewish Family
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Regulating Marital Relations between Spouses by Consent
- 2 “Freedom of Contract” in Jewish Family Law – The Differences between the Babylonian and Palestinian Talmuds
- 3 Is There Really No Conditional Marriage?
- 4 Temporary Marriage – A Possible Solution to the Problem of the Agunah?
- 5 Toward Establishing Halakhic Parenthood by Agreement?
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Jewish FamilyBetween Family Law and Contract Law, pp. 179 - 208Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Abel, Yehudah, Confronting “Iggun”: A Combination of Three Possible Solutions to the Problem of the Chained Wife in Jewish Law (2011).Google Scholar
Ahdut, Eliyahu, Ma’amad ha-Isha ha-Yehudia be-Bavel be-Tequfat ha-Talmud (PhD thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1999) (Heb.).Google Scholar
al-Kirkisani, Abu Yusuf Ya’kub, Ya’qub al-Qirqisani on Jewish Sects and Christianity: A Translation of “Kitab al-anwar” Book 1 (1984).Google Scholar
Aranoff, Susan & Haut, Rivka, The Wed-Locked Agunot: Orthodox Jewish Women Chained to Dead Marriages ( 2015 ).Google Scholar
Basol-Taha, Hiba, Temporary Marriage in Islam from the Perspectives of Shari’a, Civil Law and Social Norms (Arab.) (MA thesis, Bar-Ilan University, the Department of Arabic, 2008).Google Scholar
Beeri, Tehila, A Solution to the “Mamzer” Problem Afforded by Recent Medical Advances (MA thesis, 2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Belkin, Samuel, Philo and the Oral Law: The Philonic Interpretation of Biblical Law in Relation to the Palestinian Halakah (1940).Google Scholar
Ben-Menahem, Hanina, Judicial Deviation in Talmudic Law: Governed by Men, Not by Rules (1991).Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel, Unheroic Conduct: The Rise of Heterosexuality and the Invention of the Jewish Man ( 1997 ).Google Scholar
Breitowitz, Irving A., Between Civil and Religious Law: The Plight of the Agunah in American Society (1993).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeremy, “Be Fertile and Increase, Fill the Earth and Master It”: The Ancient and Medieval Career of a Biblical Text ( 1989 ).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, Staus, Family and Succession Laws: Between Religion and State (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dvorks, Elyakom, On Your Adopted Child: Child Adoption in the Halakha Perspective ( 2005 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ellinson, Getsel, Non-Halakhic Marriage: A Study of the Rabbinic Sources (1975) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Elon, Menachem, Jewish Law: History, Sources, Principles (3d enlarged ed., 1988) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Elon, Menachem, The Status of Women: Law and Judgment, Tradition and Transition: The Values of a Jewish and Democratic State (2005).Google Scholar
Epstein, Jacob N., Introduction to Amoraitic Literature: Babylonian Talmud and Yerushalmi (1962) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M., Love’s Promises: How Formal & Informal Contracts Shape All Kinds of Families (2015).Google Scholar
Falk, Zeev W., Marriage and Divorce : Reforms in the Family Life of German-French Jewry (1961) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Feldman, David M., Birth Control and Jewish Law: Marital Relations, Contraception, and Abortion as Set Forth in the Classic Texts of Jewish Law (1968).Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha A., The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth-Century Tragedies ( 1995 ).Google Scholar
Frankel, David H., Studies in Saadiah Gaon’s Arabic Translations 21 (MA thesis, The Ohio State University, 2012).Google Scholar
Gilat, Israel Z., Family Law – The Relations between Parents and Children – Alimony, Financial Responsibilities, Custody and Education ( 2000 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Goitein, Shelomo D., A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza vol. III (1967).Google Scholar
Gold, Michael, And Hannah Wept, : Infertility, Adoption, and the Jewish Couple (1988).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Monique S. & Diana Villa, Za‘akat Dalot: Halakhic Solutions to the Agunot of Our Time (2006) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joseph, The Best Interests of the Child: The Least Detrimental Alternative (1996).Google Scholar
Goldziher, Ignac, Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law (Andras & Ruth Hamori trans., 1981).Google Scholar
Goren, Shlomo, The Laws of Medicine: Halachic Investigations into Medical Topics (2001) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Grazi, Richard V., Be fruitful and Multiply: Fertility Therapy and the Jewish Tradition ( 1994 ).Google Scholar
Green, Yosi, Procreation in the Modern Era: Legal and Halachic Perspectives ( 2008 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Gribetz, Arthur, Strange Bedfellows: Mutat Al-Nisa and Mutat Al-Hajj: A Study Based on Sunni and Shii Sources of Tafsir, Hadith and Fiqh (1994).Google Scholar
Gulak, Asher, Legal Documents in the Talmud in Light of Greek Papyri and Greek and Roman Law (edited and supplemented by Ranon Katzoff, 1994) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization Ch. 4 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, Aviad, The Tears of the Oppressed: An Examination of the Agunah Problem: Background and Halakhic Sources (2004).Google Scholar
HaCohen, Moshe S., The Jewish Law of Child Maintenance Payments – Its Formation, Development and Circumstances (Doctoral dissertation, 1998) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Halivni, David, Sources and Traditions: A Source Critical Commentary on Seder Nashim (1968) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Heinemann, Yizhak, Philons griechische und judische Bildung:Kulturvergleichende Untersuchungen zu Philons Darstellung der judischen Gesetze (1932).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, Fertility and Jewish: Feminist Perspectives on Orthodox Responsa Literature (Joel A. Linsider trans., 2012).Google Scholar
Jachter, Chaim & Ezra, Frazer, Gray Matter: Discourses in Contemporary Halachah (2000).Google Scholar
Jakobovits, Immanuel, Jewish Medical Ethics: A Comparative and Historical Study of the Jewish Religious Attitude to Medicine and Its Practice ( 1959 ).Google Scholar
Jastrow, Marcus, A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature (1950).Google Scholar
Jolowicz, Herbert F. & Barry Nicholas, A Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law(1972).Google Scholar
Kahane, Yitschak Z., Sefer HaAgunot: Osef Mekorot Im Perushim Berruim Veherot ( 1954 ).Google Scholar
Kahn, Susan M., Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel (2000).Google Scholar
Khomeini, Ruhollah, A Clarification of Questions: An Unabridged Translation of Resaleh Towzih Al-Masael (J. Borujerdi trans., 1984).Google Scholar
Landau, Melanie, Tradition and Equality in Jewish Marriage: Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination ( 2012 ).Google Scholar
Libson, Gideon, Jewish and Islamic Law: A Comparative Study of Custom during the Geonic Period (2003).Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul, Tosefta Ki-fshutah: A Comprehensive Commentary on the Tosefta (1973).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Shahar, Contractual Regulation of Spousal Relationship in Civil Law (PhD thesis, Bar-Ilan University, 2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Marcellinus Ammianus, xiv. 4, 4.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Public Regulation and Private Agreement about Spousal Conjugal Privileges in Jewish Law (LLM thesis, Bar-Ilan University, 2006) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Milne, Brian, Rights of the Child: 25 Years after the Adoption of the UN Convention (2015).Google Scholar
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba, Marriage on Trial: A Study of Islamic Family Law: Iran and Morocco Compared (1993).Google Scholar
Murata, Sachiko, Temporary Marriage in Islamic Law (MA thesis, Divinity School, University of Tehran, 1974).Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kerry, The Politics of Adoption: International Perspectives on Law, Policy and Practice (2015).Google Scholar
Polak, Jakob E., Persien: Das Land und Seine Bewohner: Ethnographische Schilderungen vol. I (1865).Google Scholar
Porten, Bezalel, Jews of Elephantine and Arameans of Syene Fifth Century BCE (1974) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Razyel, Jonathan, Genetic Cloning – A Jewish Perspective: A Collection of Essays (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Reinitz, Yaakov, The Guardian of Orphans in Jewish Law (Doctoral dissertation, 1984) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Riskin, Shlomo, Women and Jewish Divorce: The Rebellious Wife, the Agunah and the Right of Women to Initiate Divorce in Jewish Law. A Halakhic Solution (1989).Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Jennie & Ribner, David S., The Newlywed’s Guide to Physical Intimacy (2011).Google Scholar
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay, Demonic Desires: “Yetzer Hara” and the Problem of Evil in Late Antiquity ( 2011 ).Google Scholar
Schremer, Adiel, Jewish Marriage in Talmudic Babylonia (PhD thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Marc B., Between the Yeshivah World and Modern Orthodoxy: The Life and Works of Rabbi Jehiel Jacob Weinberg 1884–1966 ( 1999 ).Google Scholar
Sindawi, Khalid, Temporary Marriage in Sunni and Shiite Islam: A Comparative Study ( 2013 ).Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Michael, A Dictionary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic of the Byzantine Period (1990).Google Scholar
Sperber, Daniel, A Dictionary of Greek and Latin Legal Terms in Rabbinical Literature ( 1984 ).Google Scholar
Steinberg, Avraham, Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics: A Compilation of Jewish Medical Law on All Topics of Medical Interest (Fred Rosner trans., 2003).Google Scholar
Warhaftig, Itamar, Undertaking in Jewish Law – Its Validity, Character and Types (2001).Google Scholar
Weiss, Susan M. & Gross-Horowitz, Netty C., Marriage and Divorce in the Jewish State: Israel’s Civil War ( 2013 ).Google Scholar
Westreich, Elimelech, Transitions in the Legal Status of the Wife in Jewish Law: A Journey among Traditions (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Wiesner-Hanks, Merry, Christianity and Sexuality in the Early Modern World: Regulating Desire, Reforming Practice (2010).Google Scholar
Witte, John, From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition (1997).Google Scholar
Witte, John, The Sins of the Fathers: The Law and Theology of Illegitimacy Reconsidered (2009).Google Scholar
Wolff, Eliezer, Yerushat Benei Ha-Zug Ba-Mishpat Ha-Ivri Ve-Ha-Yisraeli (JurD thesis, Hebrew University, 1971).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, The Right of Offspring to Seek Out Their Biological Parents (Doctoral dissertation, 2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Zucker, Moshe, Al Tirgum Rasag la-Torah: Parshanut, Halakha u-Politika be-Tirgum ha-Torah shel Rabbi Sadya Gaon: Te’udot u-Mehkarim (1959) (Heb.).Google Scholar
The Prenuptial Agreement: Halakhic and Pastoral Considerations (Basil Herring & Kenneth Auman eds., 1996).Google Scholar
Encyclopaedia Judaica, www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0001_0_00486.html.Google Scholar
Sexuality and the Family in History: Collected Essays (Israel Bartal & Isaiah Gafni eds., 1998) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, Comments on “‘En Tenai BeNissu’in” by R. Zevi Gertner and R. Bezalel Karlinski (Working Papers of the Agunah Research Unit, 2008), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612816/1302165409993/Yehudah+Abel+Comments+by+R.+Zavi+Gertner+2008.pdf?token=KWWAVKlqn5e7bj6MB5UrhV2slUM%3D.Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, Comments on R. Broyde’s Tripartite Agreement (Working Papers of the Agunah Research Unit, July 2009), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612873/1302166102187/Yehudah+Abel+Comment+on+Dayan+Broyde%27s+Tripartite+Agreement+2009.pdf?token=KQ9J2S4rDIS%2FomB8Q2HZAygf2xs%3D.Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, Hafqa’ah, Kefiyyah, Tena’im (Working Papers of the Agunah Research Unit, June 2008), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612810/1302165339947/Yehudah+Abel+Hafqa%27ah+Kefiyyah+Tena%27im+2008.pdf?token=c6U9xvBnSlpgv6gKGLrXyvv7sao%3D.Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, The Plight of the Agunah and Conditional Marriage, 1 Melilah 31 (2005/1), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612748/1302164478633/Yehudah+Abel+Plight+of+the+Agunah+and+Conditional+Marriage+2008.pdf?token=lJWm3ooNvHYcu70obTyw07mN668%3D.Google Scholar
Abramson, Shraga, On the Takkanah of Tuletula (Toledo) Regarding the Husband’s Inheritance of His Wife’s Estate, 60(2) Zion 201 (1995) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Agmon, Talia, Genetic Testing of Children – Why Not? Questions Regarding the Legislation on Genetic Testing of Children in Israel, 6 L. & Bus. 295 (2007) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Andaya, Barbara Watson, From Temporary Wife to Prostitute: Sexuality and Economic Change in Early Modern Southeast Asia, 9(4) J. Women’s History 11 (1998).Google Scholar
Annas, George J., Redefining Parenthood and Protecting Embryos: Why We Need New Laws, 14 Hastings Ctr. Rpt. 5 (1984).Google Scholar
Apter, Itai & Inbal, Nurit, Posthumous Insemination – A Nightmare or a Dream Come True? – Following the Attorney General’s Directive 1.2202, A(1) Lawatch 11 (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Aranoff, Susan, Two Views of Marriage – Two Views of Women: Reconsidering Tav Lemeitav Tan Du mi-Lemeitav Armelu, 3 Nashim 199 (2000).Google Scholar
Ariel, Yaakov, Artificial Insemination and Surrogacy, in Collection of Essays: Medical Ethics and Jewish Law 171 (Halperin, Mordechai & Primer, Yeruchim eds. 1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ariel, Yaakov, et al., Postmortem Sperm Procurement – Juridical and Halachic Aspects, 139 Harefuah 331 (2000) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Arussi, Razon, The Ethnic Factor in Rabbinical Decision-Making – (Enforcement of Divorce on the Ground of Revulsion in the Yemenite Community, 10–11 Diné Israel 125 (1981–83).Google Scholar
Assaf, Simcha, Different Decrees and Customs Relating to the Husband’s Right of Inheritance, 1 Madda’ei Ha-Yahudut 80 (1926) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Atlas, Samuel, Addition to When a Man Betroths a Woman, He Does so under the Conditions Laid down by the Rabbis, 79 Sinai 102 (1976) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Atlas, Samuel, When a Man Betroths a Woman, He Does so under the Conditions Laid down by the Rabbis, 75 Sinai 119 (1974) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Gedalia, The Obligation of the Mother in Paying Her Child Support, 4 Shurat Hadin 66 (1998) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Baker, Katharine K., Bargaining or Biology? The History and Future of Paternity Law and Parental Status, 14 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Baker, Katharine K., Bionormativity and the Construction of Parenthood, 42 Ga. L. Rev. 649 (2008).Google Scholar
Baker, Mark, The Voice of the Deserted Jewish Woman, 1867–1870, 2(1) Jewish Social Stud. 98 (1995).Google Scholar
Baum, Kenneth, Golden Eggs: Towards the Rational Regulation of Oocyte Donation, 2001 BYU L. Rev. 107 (2001).Google Scholar
Bazak, Yaakov, The Obligation of the Mother to Share the Child Support in Jewish Law, 32 Hapraklit 357 (1979–80) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Beeri-Alon, Tehila, Revisiting Some Halakhic Fundamental Principles for Solving the Mamzer Problem in Light of Recent Medical Advances, 26 Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Haivri 43 (2009–11) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Gaia, The Socio-Legal Acceptance of New Technologies: A Close Look at Artificial Insemination, 77 Wash. L. Rev. 1035 (2002).Google Scholar
Bick, Ezra, Ovum Donations: A Rabbinic Conceptual Model of Maternity, in Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies 83 (Feldman, Emanuel & Wolowelsky, Joel B. eds., 1997).Google Scholar
Bick, Ezra, Ovum Donations: A Rabbinic Conceptual Model of Maternity, 28 Tradition 28 (1993).Google ScholarPubMed
Bix, Brian, Bargaining in the Shadow of Love: The Enforcement of Premarital Agreements and How We Think about Marriage, 40 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 145 (1998).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, A Suggested Antenuptial Agreement: A Proposal in Wake of Avitzur, 7 J. Halacha & Contemporary Soc’y 25 (1984).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, In Vitro Fertilization: Questions of Maternal Identity and Conversion, 25 Tradition 82 (1991).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, In Vitro Fertilization: Questions of Maternal Identity and Conversion, in Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies 46 (Feldman, Emanuel & Wolowelsky, Joel B. eds., 1997).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, Mitochondrial DNA Replacement: How Many Mothers?, 48 (4) Tradition (2015).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, Survey of Recent Halakhic Periodical Literature: Kiddushei Taut: Annulment as a Solution to the Agunah Problem, 33 Tradition 90 (1998).Google Scholar
Blumberg, J., Munahim Mishpati’im Aravi’im mi-Dine ha-Kinyan be-Geonim uve-Rambam, 14–15 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 61 (1988–89) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Borten, Laurence Drew, Sex, Procreation, and the State Interest in Marriage, 102(4) Columbia L. Rev. 1089 (2002).Google Scholar
Boyle-Lewicki, Edna, Need World’s Collide: The Hudad Crimes of Islamic Law and International Human Rights, 13 N.Y. Int’l L. Rev. 43 (2000).Google Scholar
Breault, Adam M., “Onan’s Transgression”: The Continuing Legal Battle over Prisoners’ Procreation Rights, 66 Albany L. Rev. 289 (2002).Google Scholar
Breitowitz, Irving, The Plight of the Agunah: A Study in Halacha, Contract, and the First Amendment, 51 Md. L. Rev. 312 (1992).Google Scholar
Brewer, David I., Jewish Women Divorcing Their Husbands in Early Judaism: The Background to Papyrus Se’elim 13, 92(3) Harvard Theological Rev. 349 (1999).Google Scholar
Brody, Robert, Is the Ketubba of Biblical or of Rabbinic Origin, Neti’ot Ledavid: Jubilee Volume for David Weiss Halivni 37 (Elman, Yaakov et al. eds., 2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., A Proposed Tripartite Prenuptial Agreement to Solve the Agunah Problem: A Solution without Any Innovation, 20 Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Child Custody in Jewish Law: A Pure Law Analysis, www.jlaw.com/Articles/childcus2.html.Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Cloning People: A Jewish Law Analysis of the Issues, 3 0 Conn. L. Rev. 503 (1998).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Error in the Creation of Marriages in Modern Times under Jewish Law, 22 Dine Israel 39 (English Section) (2003).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Genetically Engineering People: A Jewish Law Analysis of Personhood, 13 St. Thomas L. Rev. 877 (2001).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Review Essay: An Unsuccessful Defense of the Bet Din of Rabbi Emanuel Rackman: The Tears of the Oppressed by Aviad Hacohen, Edah J. 4:2 (2004), www.edah.org/backend/journalarticle/4_2_broyde.pdf.Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Some Thoughts on New York State Regulation of Jewish Marriage: Covenant, Contract or Statute?, 5 Fam. in Law 55 (2011).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., The Establishment of Maternity and Paternity in Jewish and American Law, 3 Nat’l Jewish L. Rev. 117 (1988).Google Scholar
Büchler, Adolf, Das judische Verlobins und die Stellung der verlobeten eines Priesters im ersten unt zweiten Jahrhundert, in Festschrift zu Israel Lewy’s siebzigstem Geburtstag 110 (Brann, M. und Elbogen, J. eds., 1911).Google Scholar
Byrn, Mary Patricia & Holzer, Erica, Codifying the Intent Test, 41 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 130 (2015).Google Scholar
Carbone, June & Cahn, Naomi, Marriage, Parentage, and Child Support, 45 Fam. L.Q. 219 (2011).Google Scholar
Cherlow, Yuval, Protection of the Surrogate Mother – Ethics, Law and Halacha, 4 J. Health L. & Bioethics 80 (2011) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Cherry, Kristen, Marriage and Divorce Law in Pakistan and Iran: The Problem of Recognition 9 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int’l L. 319 (2001).Google Scholar
Cheruvu, Padmini, Three-Parent IVF and Its Effect on Parental Rights, 6 Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J. 73 ( 2014 ).Google Scholar
Chezem, Linda L. & Nagy, Sarah L., Judicial Abrogation of a Husband’s Paternity: Can a Third Party Seek to Establish Paternity over a Child Born into a Marriage while That Marriage Remains Intact?, 30 Ind. L. Rev. 467 (1997).Google Scholar
Choueka, Aharon, The Controversy Concerning the Takkanah of Tuletula Regarding the Husband’s Inheritance of His Wife’s Estate, 68(1) Tarbiz 87 (1999) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Coester-Waltjen, Dagmar & Coester, Michael, Formation of Marriage in Persons and Family, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law vol. 4, 6 (Glendon, Mary A. ed., 1997).Google Scholar
Cohben, Aryeh, Giddul’s Wife and the Power of the Court: On Talmudic Law, Gender, Divorce and Exile, 9 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women’s Stud. 197 (1999–2000).Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz, Conditions in Jewish and Roman Law, in Wolfson Jubilee Volume English Section 203 (Saul Lieberman ed., 1965).Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz, On the Theme of Betrothal in Jewish and Roman Law, 18 Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 67 (1948).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Glenn, Intentional Diminishment, the Non-Identity Problem, and Legal Liability, 60 Hastings L.J. 347 (2008).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Glenn, Regulating Reproduction: The Problem with Best Interests, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 423 (2011).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacques & Alikani, Mina, The Biological Basis for Defining Bi-Parental or Tri-Parental Origin of Offspring from Cytoplasmic and Spindle Transfer, 26(6) Reproductive BioMedicine Online 535 (2013).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeremy, Intention in Sexual Relations According to Twelfth- and Thirteenth-Century Rabbinical Opinion, 13 Teudah 155 (1997) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Cohen, Yedidya, The Inheritance of a Wife of Her Husband in the Communal Enactments, 6–7 Shenaton ha-Mishpat Ha-Ivri 133 (1979–80) (Heb).Google Scholar
Cooper Davis, Peggy, The Good Mother: A New Look at Psychological Parent Theory, 22 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 347 (1996).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, On the Question of Legal Parentage in Israel (Children Born through an Artificial Birth Technique), in An Unusual Pregnancy: A Multi-Disciplinary Study of In Vitro Fertilization 137 (Almog, Shulamit & Ben-Zeev, Avinoam eds., 1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, Should Equality Be Implemented in the Laws of Parents and Children?, 2 Kiryat Hamishpat 131 (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, The Legal Status of a Child Born of Artificial Means from a Sperm Donor or an Egg Donor, 18–19 Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Haivri 295 (1992–94) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Curtis, Carolyn, The Psychological Parent Doctrine in Custody Disputes between Foster Parents and Biological Parents, 16 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 149 (1980).Google Scholar
Dallas, Traci, Rebutting the Marital Presumption: A Developed Relationship Test, 88 Colum. L. Rev. 369 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’alton-Harrison, Rita, Mater Semper Incertus Est: Who’s Your Mummy?, 22(3) Med. L. Rev. 357 (2014).Google Scholar
Daudpota, U. M. & Fyzee, Asaf A. A., Notes on Mut’a or Temporary Marriage in Islam, 8 JBBRAS 79 (1932).Google Scholar
Davis, Dena S., Religious Attitudes toward Cloning: A Tale of Two Creatures, 27 Hofstra L. Rev. 509 (1999).Google Scholar
De Seife, Rodolphe J.A., Muhammad Khalid Masud, Brinkley Messick and Powers, David S. eds., Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas, 42 Am. J. Legal Hist. 84 (1998).Google Scholar
Dichovsky, Shlomo, Child Support – A Special Enactment in Charity Laws, 16 Techumin 87 (1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dichovsky, Shlomo, The Parental Obligation to Support Adoptive Children, 15 Techumin 278 (1995) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dimond, Rebecca, Social and Ethical Issues in Mitochondrial Donation, 115(1) Br. Med. Bull. 173 (2015).Google Scholar
Divon, Ido, The Obligation of an Adopting Father to Pay the Child Support Due to His Undertaking, 9 Dinei Israel 184 (1978–80) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dorff, Elliot N., Human Cloning: A Jewish Perspective, 8 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 117 (1998).Google Scholar
Drori, Moshe, International Jurisdiction of the Rabbinical Courts in Israel, 24 Justice 30 (2006).Google Scholar
Edrei, Arye, The beit din’s prerogatives in marital law, 21 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 1 (1998–2000) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Moshe, The Onah Obligation: An Ordinary Obligation or the Essence of the Marriage, 2 Hemdat haAretz 42 (2002).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, “Up to the Ears” in Horses’ Necks (BM 108a): On Sasanian Agricultural Policy and Private “Eminent Domain,” 3 JSIJ 95 (2004).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Acculturation to Elite Persian Norms and Modes of Thought in the Babylonian Jewish Community of Late Antiquity, Neti’ot Ledavid 31 (2004).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Marriage and Marital Property in Rabbinic and Sasanian Law, in Rabbinic Law in Its Roman and Near Eastern Context 227 (Hezser, Catherine ed., 2003).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Middle Persian Culture and Babylonian Sages: Accommodation and Resistance in the Shaping of Rabbinic Legal Tradition, in The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature 165 ( 2007 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Returnable Gifts in Rabbinic and Sasanian Law, VI Irano-Judaica 139 (2008).Google Scholar
Elrod, Linda D., A Child’s Perspective of Defining a Parent: The Case for Intended Parenthood, 25 BYU J. Pub. L. 245 (2011).Google Scholar
Epstein, J. N., Notes to the Jewish-Aramaic Papyri of Aswan, in Studies in Talmudic Literature and Semitic Languages vol. 1, 320 (Melamed, Ezra Z. ed., 1984) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Estin Ann, Laquer, Embracing Tradition: Pluralism in American Family Law, 63 Md. L. Rev. 540 (2004).Google Scholar
Evans-Grubbs, Judith, Abduction Marriage in Antiquity: A Law of Constantine (CTh IX.24.1) and Its Social Context, 79 J. Roman Stud. 59 (1989).Google Scholar
Falk, Ze’ev W., Mutual Obligations in the Ketubah, 8 Journal of Jewish Studies 215 (1957).Google Scholar
Ferber, Zeev, The Mother Sharing in Paying Child Support, 27 Techumin 273 (2007) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Fleishman, Josef, Socio-Legal Aspects of Genesis 34, 13 Shenaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 141 (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Fleishman, Josef, The Inheritance of a Mother’s Dowry in Ancient Near East Law and in Ancient Jewish Law, 23 Dine Israel 95 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Flusser, David & Safrai, Shmuel, In the Image of the Form of His Likeness, in Isaac Leo Seeligmann Volume, Essays on the Bible and the Ancient World vol. 2 (Hebrew Section), 453 (Rofe, Alexander & Zakovitch, Yair eds.,1983) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Fournier, Pascale, The Erasure of Islamic Difference in Canadian and American Family Law Adjudication, 10 J.L. & Pol’y 51 (2001).Google Scholar
Francus, Israel, And Again, When a Man Betroths a Woman, He Does so under the Conditions Laid down by the Rabbis, 77 Sinai 91 (1975) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Francus, Israel, Mahloket Kadmonim Be-Din Vittur Ha-Ba‘al Lareshet Et Ishto, 106 Sinai 97 (1990).Google Scholar
Freidenreich, David M., The Use of Islamic Sources in Saadiah Gaon’s “Tafsīr” of the Torah, 93(3/4) Jewish Q. Rev. 353 (2003).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Halakha as Evidence of Sexual Life among Jews in Muslim Countries in the Middle Ages, 45 Peamim 89 (1991) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Ketubot from Eretz Israel from the Geonic Period 1 Te‘udah 58 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Divorce upon the Wife’s Demand as Reflected in Manuscripts from the Cairo Geniza, 4 Jewish Law Annual 103 (1981).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., On the Relationship between Karaite and Palestinian Ketubot from the Genizah, 15 Teu‘dah 145 (1956) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Polygamy – New Information from the Genizah, 43 Tarbitz 166 (1974) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Termination of Marriage upon the Wife’s Request: A Palestinian Ketubba Stipulation, 37 PAAJAR 29 (1969).Google Scholar
Friedman, Shamma, A Good Story Deserves Retelling – The Unfolding of the Akiva Legend, 3 JSIJ 55 (2004).Google Scholar
Gafni, Isaiah. M., The Institution of Marriage in Rabbinic Times, in The Jewish Family: Metaphor and Memory 13 (Kraemer, David ed., 1989).Google Scholar
Ghodsi, Tamilla F., Tying a Slipknot: Temporary Marriages in Iran, 15 Mich. J. Int’l L. 645 (1994).Google Scholar
Ghori, Safiya, The Application of Religious Law in North American Courts: A Case Study of Muta Marriages, 10(1) J. Islamic L. & Culture 29 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilat, Israel Z., Is the “Benefit of the Child” a Major Criterion according to Jewish Law in a Parental Conflict of the Child?, 8 Bar Ilan L. Stud. 297 (1990) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Glennon, Theresa, Somebody’s Child: Evaluating the Erosion of the Marital Presumption of Paternity, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. 547 (2000).Google Scholar
Goldfeder, Mark, The Adoption of Children in Judaism and in Israel: A Conceptual and Practical Review, 22 Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 321 ( 2014 ).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Anne, Determination of Legal Parentage in Egg Donation, Embryo Transplantation, and Gestational Surrogacy Arrangements, 1992 Fam. L.Q. 275 (1992).Google Scholar
Goren, Shlomo, The Ketubah in the Babylonian Talmud and in the Palestinian Talmud, 3 Torah She-Be’al Peh 119 (1961) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Graham, Laura P., The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act and Modern Social Policy: The Enforceability of Premarital Agreements Regulating the Ongoing Marriage, 28 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1037 (1993).Google Scholar
Graves, Alison E., Women in Iran: Obstacles to Human Rights and Possible Solutions 5 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 57 (1996).Google Scholar
Grazi, Richard V. & Wolowelsky, Joel B., On Foetal Ovary Transplants 40 Le’ela (1995).Google Scholar
Green, Yosi, Artificial Insemination (AID) in Israeli Court Judgments and Legislation, 5 Assia 125 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Green, Yosi, Post Modern Procreation by Means of IVF and Ibum and Haliza, 2 Netanya Academic College L. Rev. 207 (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Greenberg-Kobrin, Michelle, Civil Enforceability of Religious Prenuptial Agreements, 32 Columbia J.L. & Social Problems 359 (1991).Google Scholar
Guidice, Richard, Procreation and the Prisoner: Does the Right to Procreate Survive Incarceration and Do Legitimate Penological Interests Justify Restrictions on the Exercise of the Right, 29 Fordham Urban L.J. 2277 (2002).Google Scholar
Gulak, Asher, Deed of Betrothal and Oral Stipulation in Talmudic Law, 3 Tarbitz 361 (1932) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Haeri, Shahla, An Islamic Discourse on Female Sexuality: Temporary Marriage in Postrevolutionary Iran, in In the Eye of the Storm: Women in Postrevolutionary Iran 98–114 (Afkhami, Mahnaz & Friedl, Erika eds., 1994).Google Scholar
Haeri, Shahla, Temporary Marriage and the State in Iran: An Islamic Discourse on Female Sexuality, 59 Soc. Res. 201 (1992).Google Scholar
Haeri, Shahla, The Institution of Mut`a Marriage in Iran: A Formal and Historical Perspective, in Islam Critical Concepts in Sociology vol. 3 Gender and the Family 154–72 (Turner, Bryan S. ed., 2003).Google Scholar
Halperin, Mordechai, The Definition of Parenthood and the Right to Find Biological Roots in Moral Dilemmas in Medicine 161 (Cohen-Almagor, Raphael ed. 2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Halperin-Kaddari, Ruth & Yadgar, Yaacov, Between Universal Feminism and Particular Nationalism: Politics, Religion and Gender (In)Equality in Israel, 31(6) Third World Q. 905 (2010).Google Scholar
Hamoudi Haider, Ala, Sex and the Shari’a: Defining Gender Norms and Sexual Deviancy in Shi’i Islam, 39 Fordham Int’l L.J. 25 ( 2015 ).Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine, Contest and Consent: A Legal History of Marital Rape, 88 California L. Rev. 1375 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashiloni-Dolev, Yael, Posthumous Reproduction (PHR) in Israel: Policy Rationales versus Lay People’s Concerns, a Preliminary Study, 39(4) Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 634 (2015).Google Scholar
Heffening, Willi, Mut’a in Encyclopaedia of Islam vol. 7, 757–59 (Bosworth, C.E. et. al eds., 1960)Google Scholar
Helmholz, Richard H., Support Orders, Church Courts, and the Rule of Filius Nullius: A Reassessment of the Common Law, 63 Va. L. Rev. 431 (1977).Google Scholar
Her, Moshe D., Marriage from a Socio-Economic Halakhic Perspective, in Mishpahot Beit Yisrael 37 (1976) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hershberg, A. S., Yofya ve-Hityafuta shel ha-Isha bi-Zman ha-Talmud, 4 He-Atid 1 (1923) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hershler, Moshe, Test-Tube Babies According to Halakha, 4 Halakha & Med. 90 (1985) (Heb.)Google Scholar
Hershler, Moshe, Test-Tube Babies According to Halakha, 1 Halakha & Med. 307 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hill, John L., What Does It Mean to Be a “Parent”? The Claims of Biology as the Basis for Parental Rights, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 353 (1991).Google Scholar
Hirschberg, Haim Z., Le-Heker Rav Sadya Gaon ve-Tequfato, 31 Tarbiz 415 (1962) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, H., In the Book of Megilat Starim, in Festschrift zum siebzigsten Geburtstage A. Berliner’s: Gewidmet von Freunden und Schulern, the Hebrew section 46 (1903) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hjerrild, Bodil, Islamic Law and Sasanian Law, in Law and the Islamic World: Past and Present 49 (Toll, Christopher & Skovgaard-Petersen, Jakob eds., 1995).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Simon, A New Autograph Fragment of Maimonides’ Hilkhot Ha-Yerushalmi, 28 J. Semitic Stud. 273 (1983).Google Scholar
Horner, Amanda, I Consented to Do What?: Posthumous Children and the Consent to Parent After-Death, 33 S. Ill. U. L.J. 157 (2008).Google Scholar
Howard, I. K. A., Mut’a Marriage Reconsidered in the Context of the Formal Procedures for Islamic Marriage, XX(1) J. Semitic Stud. 82 (1975).Google Scholar
Ilan, Mordechai, A Woman Relinquishing Her Right for Maintenance, 3 Techumin 123 (1982) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Indig, Yizhak, The Problem of Support of a Child Born of Artificial Insemination, 2 Dinei Israel 83 (1971) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, ARTs and the Prohibition of Seed Destruction: Three Methods in the Modern Psika, 7 Identites 21 (2015) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, Public and Private Rulings in Jewish Law (Halakhah): Flexibility, Concealment, and Feminist Jurisprudence, 3(1) J.L. Religion & State 25 (2014).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, Toward a Gender Critical Approach to the Philosophy of Jewish Law (Halakhah), 26(2) J. Feminist Stud. in Religion 55 (2010).Google Scholar
Israeli, Shaul, Fatherhood by Artificial Means, 33 Torah She-Be’alpe 41 (1992) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., Agunah and the Problem of Authority: Directions for Future Research 1 Melilah 1, 8 (2004).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., How Jewish Is Jewish Family Law?, LV/2 J. Jewish Stud. 201 (2004).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., Mishpat Ivri, Halakhah and Legal Philosophy: Agunah and the Theory of “Legal Sources,” 1 JSIJ 69 (2002).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., Some Reflections on Family Law in the Papyri, XIV Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 141 (Gamoran, Hillel ed., 2002).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S. & Westreich, Avishalom, Book Review of Aviad Hacohen, The Tears of the Oppressed, an Examination of the Agunah Problem: Background and Halachic Sources, 17 Jewish Law Annual 303 (2007).Google Scholar
Jacobs, Melanie B., Why Just Two? Disaggregating Traditional Parental Rights and Responsibilities to Recognize Multiple Parents, 9 J.L. Fam. Stud. 309 (2007).Google Scholar
Jensen, Brent J., Comment, Artificial Insemination and the Law, 1982 BYU L. Rev. 935 (1982).Google Scholar
Jones, Caroline & Holme, Ingrid, Relatively (im)Material: mtDNA and Genetic Relatedness in Law and Policy, 9:4 Life Sci. Soc’y & Pol’y (2013).Google Scholar
Kahser, Asa, “Planned Orphanhood”: The Balanced Picture, in Moral Dilemmas in Medicine 161 (Cohen-Almagor, Raphael ed., 2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Diane S., Why Truth Is Not a Defense in Paternity Actions, 10 Tex. J. Women & L. 69 (2000).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Yehiel S., Child Custody in Jewish Law: From Authority of the Father to the Best Interest of the Child, 24(1) J.L. & Religion 89 (2008/2009).Google Scholar
Katz, Gail A., Parpalaix c. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology, 11 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 683 (1998).Google Scholar
Kaye, Alexander, Eliezer Goldman and the Origins of Meta-Halacha, 34.3 Modern Judaism 309 (2014).Google Scholar
Khan, Shahnaz, Race, Gender, and Orientalism: Muta and the Canadian Legal System, 8 Can. J. Women & L. 249 (1995).Google Scholar
Khatib-Chahidi, Jane, Sexual Prohibitions, Shared Space and Fictive Marriages in Shi’ite Iran, in Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps 112 (Ardener, Shirley ed., 1981).Google Scholar
King, Alexa E., Solomon Revisited: Assigning Parenthood in the Context of Collaborative Reproduction, 5 UCLA Women’s L.J. 329 (1995).Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick Lacey, Walter, “Patria Potestas,” in The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives 121 (Rawson, Beryl ed., 1987).Google Scholar
Kister, Menachem, Kedat Moshe veYehudai: On the History of a Legal-Religious Term, in Atara L’Haim: Studies in the Talmud & Medieval Rabbinic Literature in Honor of Prof. Haim Zalman Dimitrovsky 202 (Boyarin, Daniel et al. eds., 2000) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Kisthardt, Mary K., Of Fatherhood, Families and Fantasy: The Legacy of Michael H. V. Gerald D., 65 Tul. L. Rev. 585 (1991).Google Scholar
Kleinman, Ron S., Contemporary Halakhic Decisors, Commercial Practices, and Civil Law, 19 The Review of Rabbinic Judaism 78 (2016).Google Scholar
Kleinman, Ron S. & Jabareen, Amal, Transfer of Ownership in E-Commerce Transactions from the Perspective of Jewish Law: In Light of Israeli and American Law, in The Oxford Handbook of Judaism and Economics 499 (Levine, Aaron ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Knapland, Kristine S., Synthetic Cells, Synthetic Life, and Inheritance, 45 Val. U. L. Rev. 1361 (2011).Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Heather, The Intended Parent: The Power and Problems Inherent in Designating and Determining Intent in the Context of Parental Rights, 119 Penn St. L. Rev. 801 (2015).Google Scholar
Koll, Perri, The Use of the Intent Doctrine to Expand the Rights of Intended Homosexual Male Parents in Surrogacy Custody Disputes, 18 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 199 (2011).Google Scholar
Kovach, Rachel L., Sorry Daddy – Your Time Is Up: Rebutting the Presumption of Paternity in Louisiana, 56 Loy. L. Rev. 651 ( 2010 ).Google Scholar
Labovitz, Gail, Review of Melanie Landau, Tradition and Equality: Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination, 4(1) Religion & Gender 70 (2014), www.religionandgender.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/rg.9491/.Google Scholar
Ladomato, Dominique, Protecting Traditional Surrogacy Contracting through Fee Payment Regulation, 23 Hastings Women’s L.J. 245 ( 2012).Google Scholar
Lasker, Daniel J., Saadya Gaon on Christianity and Islam, in The Jews of Medieval Islam: Community, Society, and Identity 165 (Frank, Daniel ed., 1995).Google Scholar
Lau, Israel M., The Halakhic Ramifications of Sexual Relationships before Marriage, 27 Torah She-Be’alpe 84 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela, Gestation: Work for Hire or the Essence of Motherhood? A Comparative Legal Analysis, 9 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol’y 91 ( 2002).Google Scholar
Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela, The Lost Children: When the Right to Children Conflicts with the Rights of Children, 8 L. & Ethics Hum. Rts. 219 (2014).Google Scholar
Legge, Michael et al., Numerical Identity: The Creation of Tri-Parental Embryos to Correct Inherited Mitochondrial Disease, 126(1385) New Zealand Med. J. (Online) 71 (2013).Google ScholarPubMed
Levin, Yael, Freeing One Agunah is Like Rebuilding One of the Ruins of Supernal Jerusalem, 23 Dine Israel 163 ( 2005).Google Scholar
Levmor, Rachel, Pre-Nuptial Agreements with the Aim of Preventing the Husband’s Refusal to Give a Get, 23 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 127 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Levmor, Rachel, Rabbinic Responses in Favor of Prenuptial Agreements, 42(1) Tradition 29 (2009).Google Scholar
Levmor, Rachel, The Prenuptial Agreement for the Prevention of GET-Refusal, https://iyim.org.il/wp-content/…/07/Article-The-Prenuptial-Agreement.doc.Google Scholar
Lewis, Browne, Two Fathers, One Dad: Allocating the Paternal Obligations between the Men Involved in the Artificial Insemination Process, 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 949 (2009).Google Scholar
Lewis, Naphtali, Katzoff, Ranon & Greenfield, Jonas C., Papyrus Yadin 18, 37 Israel Exploration J. 229 (1987).Google Scholar
Libson, Gideon, Halakhah and Reality in the Gaonic Period: Taqqanah, Minhag, Tradition and Consensus: Some Observations, in The Jews of Medieval Islam: Community, Society, and Identity 67 (Frank, Daniel ed., 1995).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Berachyahu, The Theoretical Basis of the Condition in Jewish Law, 4 Mishpatim 636 (1973) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Shahar, Neither Nature nor Contract: Toward an Institutional Perspective on Parenthood Essay, 8 L. & Ethics Hum. Rts. 297 ( 2014 ).Google Scholar
Lipschutz, Joshua H., To Clone or Not to Clone – A Jewish Perspective, 25 J. Med. Ethics 105 (1999).Google Scholar
Lowy, Simeon, The Extent of Jewish Polygamy in Talmudic Times, 9 J. Jewish Stud. 115 (1958).Google Scholar
Macuch, Maria, Die Zeitehe im Sasanidischen Recht – ein Vorlaufer der shi’itischen mut’a-Ehe in Iran?, 18 Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 187 (1985).Google Scholar
Malinowitz, Chaim Z., The 1992 New York Get Law: An Exchange, 31(3) Tradition 23 (1997).Google Scholar
Malka, David, Hithayyavut shel ha-Isha lifne ha-Nisuin le-Kabel Get, 8 Shurat ha-Din 360 (2003) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Marcus, Tali, It Takes (Only) Two to Tango? Recognizing More than Two Parents for One Child 44 Hebrew U. L.J. 415 (2014) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Artificial Insemination from Donor (AID) – From Status to Contract and Back Again?, 21(1) Boston U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 69 (2015).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Bridging the Gap between Intent and Status: A New Framework for Modern Parentage, 15 (1) Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, From Baby M to Baby M(anji): Regulating International Surrogacy Agreements, 24 (1) J.L. & Pol’y 41 (2016).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, In Defense of Surrogacy Agreements: A Modern Contract Law Perspective, 20 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 423 (2014).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Intentional Parenthood: A Solution to the Plight of Same-Sex Partners Striving for Legal Recognition as Parents, 12 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 39 (2013).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Marriage According to the Law of Moses and Israel – Between Family Law and Contract Law (forthcoming, 2018).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, On the Dispositive Foundations of the Obligation of Spousal Conjugal Relations in Jewish Law, XVIII JLAS 161 (2008).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Scarce Medical Resources – Parenthood at Every Age, in Every Case and Subsidized by the State?, 9 Netanya Academic College L. Rev. 191 ( 2014 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, The Rise, Fall and Rise Again of the Genetic Foundation for Legal Parentage Determination, 3 J. Health L. & Bioethics 125 (2010) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, To Be or Not to Be (A Parent)? – Not Precisely the Question: The Frozen Embryo Dispute, 18 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 355 (2012).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel & John, Loike, The New Frontier of Advanced Reproductive Technology: Reevaluating Modern Legal Parenthood, 37 Harvard J.L. & Gender 107 (2014).Google Scholar
Matsumura, Kaiponanea T., Public Policing of Intimate Agreements, 25 Yale J.L. & Feminism 159 (2013).Google Scholar
Mazeh, Yoav, The Religious Law of Child Support, the Supreme Court’s Case-Law and the Practice of Courts: Between Myth and Reality, Haifa L. Rev. (forthcoming, 2018) (Heb.).Google Scholar
McMillen, Michael J. T., Islamic Business and Commercial Law: Contractual Enforceability Issues: Sukuk and Capital Markets Development, 7 Chi. J. Int’l L. 427 (2007).Google Scholar
McMillen, Michael J. T., Islamic Shari’ah-Compliant Project Finance: Collateral Security and Financing Structure Case Studies, 24 Fordham Int’l L.J. 1184 ( 2001 ).Google Scholar
Meislin, Bernard, Jewish Law of Marriage in American Courts, 11 J. Fam. L. 271 (1971–72).Google Scholar
Miller, Kristin J., Human Rights of Women in Iran: The Universalist Approach and the Relativist Response 10 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 779 (1996).Google Scholar
Mintz, Adam, A Courageous Proposal: The First Heter Agunah in America, 4 JOFA J. 14 (2007).Google Scholar
Moosa, Ebrahim, The Child Belongs to the Bed: Illegitimacy and Islamic Law, in Questionable Issue: Illegitimacy in South Africa (Burman, Sandra & Preston-Whyte, Eleanor eds., 1992).Google Scholar
Moscovitz, Leib, Sugyot Muhlafot in the Talmud Yerushalmi , 60 Tarbiz 19 (1991) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Murakami, Charla, Parent-Child Relations: A Comparison of Jewish and California Law, 1 U.C. Davis J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 107 (1995).Google Scholar
Nix, Jesse M., “You Only Donated Sperm”: Using Intent to Uphold Paternity Agreements, 11 J.L. & Fam. Stud. 487 ( 2009 ).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Raymond C., The Momentum of Posthumous Conception: A Model Act, 25 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol’y 332 (2009).Google Scholar
Oller, Jason, Can I Get That in Writing?: Established and Emerging Protections of Paternity Rights [In re K.M.H., 169 P.3d 1025 (Kan. 2007)], 48 Washburn L.J. 209 (2008).Google Scholar
Orenbach, Kenneth B., The Religiously Distinct Director: Infusing Judeo-Christian Business Ethics into Corporate Governance, 2 Charlotte L. Rev. 369 (2010).Google Scholar
Orenstein, Gedalia, In Vitro Fertilization – Lineage of the Child and Fulfilling the Mitzvah of Procreation, 24 Techumin 156 (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Oryn, Theodor, Remarks on the Duty of the Mother to Participate in the Maintenance of Her Child, 34 Hapraklit 308 (1982) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Pence, Gregory, What’s So Good about Natural Motherhood? (In Praise of Unnatural Gestation) in Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction 77 (Gelfand, Scott & Shook, John R. eds., 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perikhanian, Anahit, Iranian Society and Law, 3(2) Cambridge History of Iran 627 (Sharter, Ehsan Y. ed., 1983).Google Scholar
Picard, Ariel, The Proposal of Rabbi Uzziel for Resolving the Agunah Problem, in Rabbi Uzziel and His Peers: Studies in the Religious Thought of Oriental Rabbis Twentieth-Century Israel 230 (Zohar, Zvi ed., 2009) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Pollack, Daniel et al., Classical Religious Perspectives of Adoption Law, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 693 (2004).Google Scholar
Povarsky, Chaim, Regulating Advanced Reproductive Technologies: A Comparative Analysis of Jewish and American Law, 29 U. Tol. L. Rev. 409 (1998).Google Scholar
Purvis, Dara E., Intended Parents and the Problem of Perspective, 24 Yale J.L. & Feminism 210 (2012).Google Scholar
Rabinovitz, Zvi M., Friedman, M. A., Jewish Marriage in Palestine – A Cairo Geniza Study, I-II, Tel Aviv and New York 1980–1, 55 Tarbiz 456 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Radzyner, Amihai, Gittin – Mitzvot That Depend on Eretz Israel? Prenuptial Agreement for Avoiding Get Refusal: Between America and Israel (forthcoming, 2018, on file with author).Google Scholar
Rae, Scott B., Parental Rights and the Definition of Motherhood in Surrogate Motherhood, 3 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women’s Stud. 219 (1994).Google Scholar
Rakover, Nahum, Coercive Marital Relations between a Man and His Wife, 6–7 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 295 (1979–80) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Rao, Radhika, Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Threat to the Traditional Family, 47 Hastings L.J. 951 (1996).Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Manfred, Status, Contract and the Welfare State, 23 Stan. L. Rev. 941 (1971).Google Scholar
Reichman, Edward, The Halakhic Chapter of Ovarian Transplantation, 31(1) Tradition 31 (1998) .Google Scholar
Reichman Schiff, Anne, Arising from the Dead: Challenges of Posthumous Procreation, 75 N.C. L. Rev. 901 (1997).Google Scholar
Reinitz, Yaakov, Appointing a Female Apotropos, 4 Bar Ilan L. Stud. 167 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Reinitz, Yaakov, The Apotropos of Orphans Who Are Supported by the Owner, 1 Bar Ilan L. Stud. 219 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Richardson, Christopher F., Islamic Finance Opportunities in the Oil and Gas Sector: An Introduction to an Emerging Field, 42 Tex. Int’l L.J. 119 (2006).Google Scholar
Riskin, Shlomo, Hafka’at Kiddushin: Towards Solving the Aguna Problem in Our Time, 36(4) Tradition 1 (2002).Google Scholar
Roberts, Paula, Truth and Consequences: Part I. Disestablishing the Paternity of Non-Marital Children, 37 Fam. L.Q. 35 (2003).Google Scholar
Robertson, John A., Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Family, 47 Hastings L.J. 911 (1996).Google Scholar
Rodgers-Miller, Brooke D., Out of Jahiliyya: Historic and Modern Incarnations of Polygamy in the Islamic World, 11 Wm. & Mary J. of Women & L. 541 (2005).Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Irit, Being Fruitful and Multiplying: Legal, Philosophical, Religious, and Medical Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Israel and Internationally, 36 Suffolk Transnat’l L. Rev. 627 (2013).Google Scholar
Rosner, Fred, In Vitro Fertilization, Surrogate Motherhood, and Sex Organ Transplants Symposium: Reproductive Rights, 25 Creighton L. Rev. 1669 (1991–92).Google Scholar
Rostain, Tanina, Permissible Accommodations of Religion: Reconsidering the New York Get Statute, 96(5) Yale L.J. 1147 (1987).Google Scholar
Roth, Rachel, No New Babies?: Gender Inequality and Reproductive Control in the Criminal Justice and Prison Systems, 12 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 391 (2004).Google Scholar
Runner, Brenda J., Protecting a Husband’s Parental Rights When His Wife Disputes the Presumption of Legitimacy, 28 J. Fam. L. 115 (1989–90).Google Scholar
Ryzman, Zvi, Ovary Transplantion – Is It Forbidden as Sterilization?, 31 Techumin 38 ( 2011 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Sabreen, Mudasra, Parentage: A Comparative Study of Islamic and Pakistani Law, 1(2) Frontiers of Legal Research 21 (2013).Google Scholar
Sackin, Jessica S., The Halakhic/Constitutional Argument for Human Reproductive Cloning in America, 7 Geo. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 627 (2009).Google Scholar
Salaymeh, Lena, Every Law Tells a Story: Orthodox Divorce in Jewish and Islamic Legal Histories, 4(1) UC Irvine L. Rev. 19 (2014).Google Scholar
Satlow, Michael L., Slipping Toward Sacrament: Jews, Christians and Marriage, in Jewish Culture and Society under the Christian Roman Empire 65 (Kalmin, Richard & Schwartz, Seth eds, 2003).Google Scholar
Scheiber, Alexander & Hahn, Yizhak, (Manuscript) Leaves from Se’adya’s Sefer Hamizwot, 28 Tarbiz 48 (1959) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Schereschewsky, Ben Zion, “Apotropos” in The Principles of Jewish Law 219 (Elon, Menachem ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Schereschewsky, Ben Zion, “Mamzer” in The Principles of Jewish Law 435–38 (Menachem Elon ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Schereschewsky, Ben Zion, “Parent and Child” in The Principles of Jewish Law 424–29 (Elon, Menachem ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Schiff Reichman, Anne, Solomonic Decisions in Egg Donation: Unscrambling the Conundrum of Legal Maternity, 80 Iowa L. Rev. 265 (1995).Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, Elisha, [on] Z. W. Falk, The Divorce Action by the Wife in Jewish Law, 6 Dine Israel 303 (1975) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Schremer, Adiel, How Much Jewish Polygyny in Roman Palestine?, 63 Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 181 (2001).Google Scholar
Schremer, Adiel, Papyrus Se’elim 13 and the Question of Divorce Initiated by Women in Ancient Jewish Halakhah, 63 Zion 377 (1998) (Heb.)Google Scholar
Schultz, Jessica H., Development of Ectogenesis: How Will Artificial Wombs Affect the Legal Status of a Fetus or Embryo?, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 877 (2010).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gedalia D., Comments on the New York State “Get Law” – Jewish Law?: Examining Halacha, Jewish Issues and Secular Law (1994), www.jlaw.com/Articles/get_law1.html.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Laura J., Religious Matching for Adoption: Unraveling the Interests Behind the “Best Interests” Standard, 25 Fam. L.Q. 171 (1991).Google Scholar
Segal, Peretz, Jewish Law during the Tannaitic Period, in An Introduction to the History and Sources of Jewish Law 137 (Neil S. Hecht et al. eds., 1996).Google Scholar
Septimus, Zvi & Selaymeh, Lena, Temporalities of Marriage: Jewish and Islamic Legal Debates, in Talmudic Transgressions: Essays in Honor of Daniel Boyarin 201 (Rosen-Zvi, Ishay et al., 2017).Google Scholar
Shagar, , Mitzvat Onah, in And He Named Them Adam: Love and Relationships from a New Jewish Point of View 193 (Maor, Zohar ed., 2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shapira, Amos, Normative Regulation of Reproductive Technologies in Israel, 13 Nova L. Rev. 609 (1989).Google Scholar
Shawa, Menashe, Maintenance of Minor Children in Jewish and Positive Law, 13 Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 289 (2002).Google Scholar
Shiber, Yair, The Halakhic-Legal Status of a Living Being Born by Genetic Cloning, 16 Bekhol Derakhekha Daehu, Journal of Torah and Scholarship 45 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, Establishing Parenthood for a Child Born through Artificial Insemination, 10 Hebrew U. L.J. 63 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, Family Law in Israel: The Struggle between Religious and Secular Law, 24 Isr. L. Rev. 537 (1990).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, The New Agunah: Religious Divorce in Israel, 6 Alei Mishpat 27 (2007) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, The Status of the Unmarried Parent in Israel Law, 12 Isr. L. Rev. 194 (1977).Google Scholar
Shtober, Shimon, Al Shte She’elot she-Hufnu el Rabenu Avraham ben ha-Rambam (referring to a slave – Pilegesh), 6–7 Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Haivri 399 (1979–80).Google Scholar
Shultz, Marjorie M., Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy, 70 Cal. L. Rev. 204 (1982).Google Scholar
Shultz, Marjorie M., Reproductive Technology and Intent-Based Parenthood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality, 1990 Wis. L. Rev. 297 (1990).Google Scholar
Sikaitis, Joline F., A New Form of Family Planning? The Enforceability of No-Child Provisions in Prenuptial Agreements, 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 335 (2004).Google Scholar
Silber, Sherman J., Judaism and Reproductive Technology, 156 Cancer Treat Res. 471 (2010).Google Scholar
Silberg, Moshe, Law and Morals in Jewish Jurisprudence, 75 Harv. L. Rev. 306 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Daniel B., Assisted Reproduction in Jewish Law, 30 Fordham Urb. L.J. 71 (2002).Google Scholar
Soloveitchik, Yosef B., The Marriage, in Family Redeemed: Essays on Family Relationships vol. 1, 31 (Shatz, David & Wolowelsky, Joel B. eds., 2000).Google Scholar
Son, Hyun Jee, Artificial Wombs, Frozen Embryos, and Abortion: Reconciling Viability’s Doctrinal Ambiguity, 14 UCLA Women’s L.J. 213 (2005).Google Scholar
Squillace, Lynn M., Too Much of a Good Thing: Toward a Regulated Market in Human Eggs, 1 J. Health & Biomed. L. 135 (2005).Google Scholar
Stigall, Dan E., Iraqi Civil Law: Its Sources, Substance, and Sundering, 16 J. Transnat’l L. & Pol’y 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., Parenthood by Pure Intention: Assisted Reproduction and the Functional Approach to Parentage, 53 Hastings L.J. 597 (2002).Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., “The Phantom Children of the Republic”: International Surrogacy and the New Illegitimacy, 20 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 561 (2012).Google Scholar
Stumpf, Andrea E., Redefining Mother: A Legal Matrix for New Reproductive Technologies, 96 Yale L.J. 187 (1986).Google Scholar
Swift, Katherine M., Parenting Agreements, the Potential Power of Contract, and the Limits of Family Law, 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 913 (2007).Google Scholar
Tachibana, Masahito et al., Towards Germline Gene Therapy of Inherited Mitochondrial Diseases, 493(7434) Nature 627 (2013).Google Scholar
Tacy, Kimberly J., Islamic Finance: A Growing Industry in the United States, 10 N.C. Banking Inst. 355 (2006).Google Scholar
Temple, Gregg, Freedom of Contract and Intimate Relationships, 8 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 121 (1985).Google Scholar
Tiefenbrun, Susan W., The Semiotics of Women’s Human Rights in Iran, 23 Conn. J. Int’l L. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Tikachinski, Michal & Rachel, Sperber-Frankel, Tazhiram min ha-Pilegesh, 17 Akdamot 67 (2006).Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi H., “A Jewish and Democratic State”: Reflections on the Fragility of Israeli Secularism, 41 Pepp. L. Rev. 1091 (2014).Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi H., Freedom from Religion in Israel: Civil Marriages and Cohabitation of Jews Enter the Rabbinical Courts, 27(2) Israel Stud. Rev. 1 (2012).Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi H., The Gendered Racial Formation: Foreign Men, “Our” Women, and the Law, 30 Women’s Rts. L. Rep. 479 ( 2008–09).Google Scholar
Villareale, Catherine, The Case of Two Biological Intended Mothers: Illustrating the Need to Statutorily Define Maternity in Maryland, 42 U. Balt. L. Rev. 365 (2013).Google Scholar
Voinarevich, Olga, A Fairy Tale Interrupted: The Long-Term Impacts of Child Marriage in Yemen and the Necessary Adjustments to Both Local and International Laws to Stop the Practice and to Protect Voiceless Child Brides, 16 Rutgers Race & L. Rev. 203 (2015).Google Scholar
Wald, Deborah H., The Parentage Puzzle: The Interplay between Genetics, Procreative Intent, and Parental Conduct in Determining Legal Parentage, 15 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 379 (2007).Google Scholar
Warhaftig, Itamar, The Legal Validity of Reliance on Oral Promise in Jewish Law, 2 Bar-Ilan L. Stud. 45 (1982) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Warhaftig, Zerach, To the Sources of the Obligation of Child Support, 1 Techumin 255 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Warmflash, Lawrence M., The New York Approach to Enforcing Religious Marriage Contracts: From Avitzur to the Get Statute, 50 Brook. L. Rev. 229 (1983–84).Google Scholar
Warzynski, Vanessa L., Termination of Parental Rights: The “Psychological Parent” Standard, 39 Vill. L. Rev. 737 (1994).Google Scholar
Weiss, Susan M., Sign at Your Own Risk: The RCA Prenuptial May Prejudice the Fairness of Your Future Divorce Settlement, 6 Cardozo Women’s L.J. 49 (1999).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Give Me Children or Else I Am Dead: Orthodox Jewish Perspectives on Fertility, in Faith and Fertility: Attitudes towards Reproductive Practices in Different Religions from Ancient to Modern Times 205 (Blyth, Eric & Landau, Ruth eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Ovary Transplantion in Halachic Perspective, 31 Techumin 48 ( 2011 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Taking Sperm from an Unconscious Husband, 25 Tchumin 59 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Technology in the Service of the First Mitzvah, 6 Ḥakirah, the Flatbush J. Jewish L. & Thought 259 (2008).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, The Helakhic Status of an Infertile Couple, 23 Tchumin 223 (2003) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Werber, Stephen J., Cloning: A Jewish Law Perspective with a Comparative Study of Other Abrahamic Traditions, 30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1114 ( 2000 ).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Changing Motherhood Paradigms: Jewish Law, Civil Law, and Society, 28 Hastings Women’s L.J. 97 (2017).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Divorce on Demand: The History, Dogmatics, and Hermeneutics of the Wife’s Right to Divorce in Jewish Law, 62 J. Jewish Stud. 340 (2011).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Hafka’at Kiddushin (Annulment of Marriage): Reexamination of an Old Debate, 27–28 Sidra 111 (2013) (Heb.) Annulment of Marriage (Hafka‘at Kiddushin): Re-examination of an Old Debate, http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612805/1302165216787/Avishalom+Westreich+Annulment+of+Marriage+2008.pdf?token=76V70xZQdDv2JQcFEdSwZd0wP24%3D.Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Right to Divorce in Jewish Law: Between Politics and Ideology, 1 Int’l J. Jurisprudence Fam. 177 (2010).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, “Such Coercion Never Occurred to the Sages” (Nachmanides, Ketubot 63b) – Divorce Compulsion in the Mishnaic and Talmudic Laws of the Rebellious Wife, 25(2) Bar-Ilan L. Stud. 563 (2009).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, The Wife’s Right to Divorce in Jewish Law: History, Dogmatics and Hermeneutics, 62(2) J. Jewish Stud. 340 (2011).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Tradition and Equality in Jewish Marriage: Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination by Melanie Landau (review), 28 Nashim 147 (2015).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Umdena as a Ground for Marriage Annulment: Between Mistaken Transaction (Kiddushei Ta’ut) and Terminative Condition, 20 Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 330 (2010).Google Scholar
Westreich, Elimelech, The Legal-Historical Sources of the Parents Obligation to Maintain Their Children, 19 Dinei Israel 161 (1997) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Wieder, Jeremy & Riskin, Shlomo, Hafka’at Kiddushin: A Rebuttal, 36(4) Tradition 37 (2002).Google Scholar
Williams, Devon D., Over My Dead Body: The Legal Nightmare and Medical Phenomenon of Posthumous Conception through Postmortem Sperm Retrieval, 34 Campbell L. Rev. 181 (2012).Google Scholar
Witte, John & Nichols, Joel A., Marriage, Religion, and the Role of the Civil State: More Than a Mere Contract: Marriage as Contract and Covenant in Law and Theology, 5 U. St. Thomas L.J. 595 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolowelsky, Joel B. & Grazi, Richard V., Future Directions, in Richard V. Grazi, Overcoming Infertility 425–40 ( 2005 ).Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Barbara B., Hatching the Egg: A Child-Centered Perspective on Parents’ Rights, 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 1747 (1993).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, Dying to Be a Father: Legal Paternity in Cases of Posthumous Conception, 8 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol’y 47 (2007).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, If It Ain’t [Completely] Broke, Don’t Fix It: Determining Paternity According to the Genetic Information Law (Amendment no. 3), 2008, 3 Hukim – The Israeli Journal of Legislation 191 (2011) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, More Than One Mother: Determining Maternity for the Biological Child of a Female Same-Sex Couple – The Israeli View, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 115 (2008).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, Whose Child Are You? The Israeli Paternity Regulation and Its Flaws, 46 Hapraklit 311 (2003) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Zohar, Zvi, Halakhic Positions Permitting Nonmarital Sexual Intimacy, 17 Akdamot 11 (2006). Teshuva le-Magivim, 17 Akdamot 77 (2006).Google Scholar
Developments in the Law: IV. Changing Realities of Parenthood: The Law’s Response to the Evolving American Family and Emerging Reproductive Technologies, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 2052 (2003).Google Scholar
Symposium: The New “Illegitimacy”: Revisiting Why Parentage Should Not Depend on Marriage, 20 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 347–740 (2012).Google Scholar
Blackburn-Starza, Antony, Germline in the Sand: The Ethics and Law of Engineering the Embryo, BioNews 836, Jan. 25, 2016.Google Scholar
Buxton, Jess, Genome Editing and CRISPR: The Science of Engineering the Embryo, BioNews 835, Jan. 18, 2016.Google Scholar
Jaiswal, Ritesh R., Three Parent IVF / Three Parent Baby, The Science, Feb 19, 2015, http://thescience.co.in/tag/three-parents-ivf/.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel & Loike, John, Follicular Transplants and Motherhood (unpublished manuscript, on file with author).Google Scholar
Ochert, Ayala, HFEA Grants Permission to Genetically Edit Human Embryos, BioNews 837, Feb. 1, 2016.Google Scholar
Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact: 11th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2015 (Ernesto Damiani et al. eds., 2015).Google Scholar
Pritchard, Sarah, Why the UK Should Be Leading the Discussion on Embryo Engineering, BioNews 834, Jan. 11, 2016.Google Scholar
Regev, David, Woman’s Dream to Have Child Fulfilled after Death, Ynet Magazine June 14, 2011, www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4081456,00.html.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Irit, The Biological Will – A New Paradigm in ART?, New Family Org. (Feb. 25, 2013), www.newfamily.org.il/en/4905/the-biological-will%E2%84%A2-%E2%80%93-a-new-paradigm-in-art/.Google Scholar
Ryzman, Zvi, Is a Cloned Kohen Permitted to Recite the Kohen’s Blessing? (Heb.), http://olamot.net/sites/default/files/ratz_katzvi/pdf/-_32.pdf.Google Scholar
Shapira, Yaakov, And Again, Would You Murder and Also Inherit?, 374 Weekly Parasha, Pinchas (2010), www.justice.gov.il/Units/MishpatIvri/Gilyonot/374.rtf.Google Scholar
Sheva Brenner, Bayla, Filling the Void: Creating Jewish Families through Adoption, http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/ja/5766/spring66/FillingVoid.pdf.Google Scholar
Shochetman, Eliav, Would You Murder and Also Inherit?, 302 Weekly Parasha, Bereshit (2008), www.daat.ac.il/mishpat-ivri/skirot/302-2.htm.Google Scholar
The Israeli Ministry of Health, The Public Commission for Revision of the Legislative Regulation of Fertility and Childbearing in Israel (2012), www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/BAP2012.pdf (Heb.).Google Scholar
The responsum of Asher Weiss concerning triple parent IVF following mitochondrial DNA replacement that was posted at http://en.tvunah.org/2013/12/29/triple-parent-ivf/.Google Scholar
U.S. Catholic Conference, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation, Donum Vitae ( 1987 ).Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Infertility: Medical and Social Choices 282 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Immigration Law Service 2d PSD FAM Iran, Immigration Law Service, Second Edition, February 2016 Update, Reciprocity Schedules and Country Document Finder, http://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/fees/reciprocity-by-country/IR.html.Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, Confronting “Iggun”: A Combination of Three Possible Solutions to the Problem of the Chained Wife in Jewish Law (2011).Google Scholar
Ahdut, Eliyahu, Ma’amad ha-Isha ha-Yehudia be-Bavel be-Tequfat ha-Talmud (PhD thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1999) (Heb.).Google Scholar
al-Kirkisani, Abu Yusuf Ya’kub, Ya’qub al-Qirqisani on Jewish Sects and Christianity: A Translation of “Kitab al-anwar” Book 1 (1984).Google Scholar
Aranoff, Susan & Haut, Rivka, The Wed-Locked Agunot: Orthodox Jewish Women Chained to Dead Marriages ( 2015 ).Google Scholar
Basol-Taha, Hiba, Temporary Marriage in Islam from the Perspectives of Shari’a, Civil Law and Social Norms (Arab.) (MA thesis, Bar-Ilan University, the Department of Arabic, 2008).Google Scholar
Beeri, Tehila, A Solution to the “Mamzer” Problem Afforded by Recent Medical Advances (MA thesis, 2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Belkin, Samuel, Philo and the Oral Law: The Philonic Interpretation of Biblical Law in Relation to the Palestinian Halakah (1940).Google Scholar
Ben-Menahem, Hanina, Judicial Deviation in Talmudic Law: Governed by Men, Not by Rules (1991).Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel, Unheroic Conduct: The Rise of Heterosexuality and the Invention of the Jewish Man ( 1997 ).Google Scholar
Breitowitz, Irving A., Between Civil and Religious Law: The Plight of the Agunah in American Society (1993).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeremy, “Be Fertile and Increase, Fill the Earth and Master It”: The Ancient and Medieval Career of a Biblical Text ( 1989 ).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, Staus, Family and Succession Laws: Between Religion and State (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dvorks, Elyakom, On Your Adopted Child: Child Adoption in the Halakha Perspective ( 2005 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ellinson, Getsel, Non-Halakhic Marriage: A Study of the Rabbinic Sources (1975) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Elon, Menachem, Jewish Law: History, Sources, Principles (3d enlarged ed., 1988) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Elon, Menachem, The Status of Women: Law and Judgment, Tradition and Transition: The Values of a Jewish and Democratic State (2005).Google Scholar
Epstein, Jacob N., Introduction to Amoraitic Literature: Babylonian Talmud and Yerushalmi (1962) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M., Love’s Promises: How Formal & Informal Contracts Shape All Kinds of Families (2015).Google Scholar
Falk, Zeev W., Marriage and Divorce : Reforms in the Family Life of German-French Jewry (1961) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Feldman, David M., Birth Control and Jewish Law: Marital Relations, Contraception, and Abortion as Set Forth in the Classic Texts of Jewish Law (1968).Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha A., The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth-Century Tragedies ( 1995 ).Google Scholar
Frankel, David H., Studies in Saadiah Gaon’s Arabic Translations 21 (MA thesis, The Ohio State University, 2012).Google Scholar
Gilat, Israel Z., Family Law – The Relations between Parents and Children – Alimony, Financial Responsibilities, Custody and Education ( 2000 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Goitein, Shelomo D., A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza vol. III (1967).Google Scholar
Gold, Michael, And Hannah Wept, : Infertility, Adoption, and the Jewish Couple (1988).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Monique S. & Diana Villa, Za‘akat Dalot: Halakhic Solutions to the Agunot of Our Time (2006) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joseph, The Best Interests of the Child: The Least Detrimental Alternative (1996).Google Scholar
Goldziher, Ignac, Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law (Andras & Ruth Hamori trans., 1981).Google Scholar
Goren, Shlomo, The Laws of Medicine: Halachic Investigations into Medical Topics (2001) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Grazi, Richard V., Be fruitful and Multiply: Fertility Therapy and the Jewish Tradition ( 1994 ).Google Scholar
Green, Yosi, Procreation in the Modern Era: Legal and Halachic Perspectives ( 2008 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Gribetz, Arthur, Strange Bedfellows: Mutat Al-Nisa and Mutat Al-Hajj: A Study Based on Sunni and Shii Sources of Tafsir, Hadith and Fiqh (1994).Google Scholar
Gulak, Asher, Legal Documents in the Talmud in Light of Greek Papyri and Greek and Roman Law (edited and supplemented by Ranon Katzoff, 1994) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization Ch. 4 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, Aviad, The Tears of the Oppressed: An Examination of the Agunah Problem: Background and Halakhic Sources (2004).Google Scholar
HaCohen, Moshe S., The Jewish Law of Child Maintenance Payments – Its Formation, Development and Circumstances (Doctoral dissertation, 1998) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Halivni, David, Sources and Traditions: A Source Critical Commentary on Seder Nashim (1968) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Heinemann, Yizhak, Philons griechische und judische Bildung:Kulturvergleichende Untersuchungen zu Philons Darstellung der judischen Gesetze (1932).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, Fertility and Jewish: Feminist Perspectives on Orthodox Responsa Literature (Joel A. Linsider trans., 2012).Google Scholar
Jachter, Chaim & Ezra, Frazer, Gray Matter: Discourses in Contemporary Halachah (2000).Google Scholar
Jakobovits, Immanuel, Jewish Medical Ethics: A Comparative and Historical Study of the Jewish Religious Attitude to Medicine and Its Practice ( 1959 ).Google Scholar
Jastrow, Marcus, A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature (1950).Google Scholar
Jolowicz, Herbert F. & Barry Nicholas, A Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law(1972).Google Scholar
Kahane, Yitschak Z., Sefer HaAgunot: Osef Mekorot Im Perushim Berruim Veherot ( 1954 ).Google Scholar
Kahn, Susan M., Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel (2000).Google Scholar
Khomeini, Ruhollah, A Clarification of Questions: An Unabridged Translation of Resaleh Towzih Al-Masael (J. Borujerdi trans., 1984).Google Scholar
Landau, Melanie, Tradition and Equality in Jewish Marriage: Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination ( 2012 ).Google Scholar
Libson, Gideon, Jewish and Islamic Law: A Comparative Study of Custom during the Geonic Period (2003).Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul, Tosefta Ki-fshutah: A Comprehensive Commentary on the Tosefta (1973).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Shahar, Contractual Regulation of Spousal Relationship in Civil Law (PhD thesis, Bar-Ilan University, 2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Marcellinus Ammianus, xiv. 4, 4.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Public Regulation and Private Agreement about Spousal Conjugal Privileges in Jewish Law (LLM thesis, Bar-Ilan University, 2006) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Milne, Brian, Rights of the Child: 25 Years after the Adoption of the UN Convention (2015).Google Scholar
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba, Marriage on Trial: A Study of Islamic Family Law: Iran and Morocco Compared (1993).Google Scholar
Murata, Sachiko, Temporary Marriage in Islamic Law (MA thesis, Divinity School, University of Tehran, 1974).Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kerry, The Politics of Adoption: International Perspectives on Law, Policy and Practice (2015).Google Scholar
Polak, Jakob E., Persien: Das Land und Seine Bewohner: Ethnographische Schilderungen vol. I (1865).Google Scholar
Porten, Bezalel, Jews of Elephantine and Arameans of Syene Fifth Century BCE (1974) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Razyel, Jonathan, Genetic Cloning – A Jewish Perspective: A Collection of Essays (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Reinitz, Yaakov, The Guardian of Orphans in Jewish Law (Doctoral dissertation, 1984) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Riskin, Shlomo, Women and Jewish Divorce: The Rebellious Wife, the Agunah and the Right of Women to Initiate Divorce in Jewish Law. A Halakhic Solution (1989).Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Jennie & Ribner, David S., The Newlywed’s Guide to Physical Intimacy (2011).Google Scholar
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay, Demonic Desires: “Yetzer Hara” and the Problem of Evil in Late Antiquity ( 2011 ).Google Scholar
Schremer, Adiel, Jewish Marriage in Talmudic Babylonia (PhD thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Marc B., Between the Yeshivah World and Modern Orthodoxy: The Life and Works of Rabbi Jehiel Jacob Weinberg 1884–1966 ( 1999 ).Google Scholar
Sindawi, Khalid, Temporary Marriage in Sunni and Shiite Islam: A Comparative Study ( 2013 ).Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Michael, A Dictionary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic of the Byzantine Period (1990).Google Scholar
Sperber, Daniel, A Dictionary of Greek and Latin Legal Terms in Rabbinical Literature ( 1984 ).Google Scholar
Steinberg, Avraham, Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics: A Compilation of Jewish Medical Law on All Topics of Medical Interest (Fred Rosner trans., 2003).Google Scholar
Warhaftig, Itamar, Undertaking in Jewish Law – Its Validity, Character and Types (2001).Google Scholar
Weiss, Susan M. & Gross-Horowitz, Netty C., Marriage and Divorce in the Jewish State: Israel’s Civil War ( 2013 ).Google Scholar
Westreich, Elimelech, Transitions in the Legal Status of the Wife in Jewish Law: A Journey among Traditions (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Wiesner-Hanks, Merry, Christianity and Sexuality in the Early Modern World: Regulating Desire, Reforming Practice (2010).Google Scholar
Witte, John, From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition (1997).Google Scholar
Witte, John, The Sins of the Fathers: The Law and Theology of Illegitimacy Reconsidered (2009).Google Scholar
Wolff, Eliezer, Yerushat Benei Ha-Zug Ba-Mishpat Ha-Ivri Ve-Ha-Yisraeli (JurD thesis, Hebrew University, 1971).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, The Right of Offspring to Seek Out Their Biological Parents (Doctoral dissertation, 2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Zucker, Moshe, Al Tirgum Rasag la-Torah: Parshanut, Halakha u-Politika be-Tirgum ha-Torah shel Rabbi Sadya Gaon: Te’udot u-Mehkarim (1959) (Heb.).Google Scholar
The Prenuptial Agreement: Halakhic and Pastoral Considerations (Basil Herring & Kenneth Auman eds., 1996).Google Scholar
Encyclopaedia Judaica, www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0001_0_00486.html.Google Scholar
Sexuality and the Family in History: Collected Essays (Israel Bartal & Isaiah Gafni eds., 1998) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, Comments on “‘En Tenai BeNissu’in” by R. Zevi Gertner and R. Bezalel Karlinski (Working Papers of the Agunah Research Unit, 2008), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612816/1302165409993/Yehudah+Abel+Comments+by+R.+Zavi+Gertner+2008.pdf?token=KWWAVKlqn5e7bj6MB5UrhV2slUM%3D.Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, Comments on R. Broyde’s Tripartite Agreement (Working Papers of the Agunah Research Unit, July 2009), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612873/1302166102187/Yehudah+Abel+Comment+on+Dayan+Broyde%27s+Tripartite+Agreement+2009.pdf?token=KQ9J2S4rDIS%2FomB8Q2HZAygf2xs%3D.Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, Hafqa’ah, Kefiyyah, Tena’im (Working Papers of the Agunah Research Unit, June 2008), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612810/1302165339947/Yehudah+Abel+Hafqa%27ah+Kefiyyah+Tena%27im+2008.pdf?token=c6U9xvBnSlpgv6gKGLrXyvv7sao%3D.Google Scholar
Abel, Yehudah, The Plight of the Agunah and Conditional Marriage, 1 Melilah 31 (2005/1), http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612748/1302164478633/Yehudah+Abel+Plight+of+the+Agunah+and+Conditional+Marriage+2008.pdf?token=lJWm3ooNvHYcu70obTyw07mN668%3D.Google Scholar
Abramson, Shraga, On the Takkanah of Tuletula (Toledo) Regarding the Husband’s Inheritance of His Wife’s Estate, 60(2) Zion 201 (1995) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Agmon, Talia, Genetic Testing of Children – Why Not? Questions Regarding the Legislation on Genetic Testing of Children in Israel, 6 L. & Bus. 295 (2007) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Andaya, Barbara Watson, From Temporary Wife to Prostitute: Sexuality and Economic Change in Early Modern Southeast Asia, 9(4) J. Women’s History 11 (1998).Google Scholar
Annas, George J., Redefining Parenthood and Protecting Embryos: Why We Need New Laws, 14 Hastings Ctr. Rpt. 5 (1984).Google Scholar
Apter, Itai & Inbal, Nurit, Posthumous Insemination – A Nightmare or a Dream Come True? – Following the Attorney General’s Directive 1.2202, A(1) Lawatch 11 (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Aranoff, Susan, Two Views of Marriage – Two Views of Women: Reconsidering Tav Lemeitav Tan Du mi-Lemeitav Armelu, 3 Nashim 199 (2000).Google Scholar
Ariel, Yaakov, Artificial Insemination and Surrogacy, in Collection of Essays: Medical Ethics and Jewish Law 171 (Halperin, Mordechai & Primer, Yeruchim eds. 1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ariel, Yaakov, et al., Postmortem Sperm Procurement – Juridical and Halachic Aspects, 139 Harefuah 331 (2000) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Arussi, Razon, The Ethnic Factor in Rabbinical Decision-Making – (Enforcement of Divorce on the Ground of Revulsion in the Yemenite Community, 10–11 Diné Israel 125 (1981–83).Google Scholar
Assaf, Simcha, Different Decrees and Customs Relating to the Husband’s Right of Inheritance, 1 Madda’ei Ha-Yahudut 80 (1926) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Atlas, Samuel, Addition to When a Man Betroths a Woman, He Does so under the Conditions Laid down by the Rabbis, 79 Sinai 102 (1976) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Atlas, Samuel, When a Man Betroths a Woman, He Does so under the Conditions Laid down by the Rabbis, 75 Sinai 119 (1974) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Gedalia, The Obligation of the Mother in Paying Her Child Support, 4 Shurat Hadin 66 (1998) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Baker, Katharine K., Bargaining or Biology? The History and Future of Paternity Law and Parental Status, 14 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Baker, Katharine K., Bionormativity and the Construction of Parenthood, 42 Ga. L. Rev. 649 (2008).Google Scholar
Baker, Mark, The Voice of the Deserted Jewish Woman, 1867–1870, 2(1) Jewish Social Stud. 98 (1995).Google Scholar
Baum, Kenneth, Golden Eggs: Towards the Rational Regulation of Oocyte Donation, 2001 BYU L. Rev. 107 (2001).Google Scholar
Bazak, Yaakov, The Obligation of the Mother to Share the Child Support in Jewish Law, 32 Hapraklit 357 (1979–80) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Beeri-Alon, Tehila, Revisiting Some Halakhic Fundamental Principles for Solving the Mamzer Problem in Light of Recent Medical Advances, 26 Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Haivri 43 (2009–11) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Gaia, The Socio-Legal Acceptance of New Technologies: A Close Look at Artificial Insemination, 77 Wash. L. Rev. 1035 (2002).Google Scholar
Bick, Ezra, Ovum Donations: A Rabbinic Conceptual Model of Maternity, in Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies 83 (Feldman, Emanuel & Wolowelsky, Joel B. eds., 1997).Google Scholar
Bick, Ezra, Ovum Donations: A Rabbinic Conceptual Model of Maternity, 28 Tradition 28 (1993).Google ScholarPubMed
Bix, Brian, Bargaining in the Shadow of Love: The Enforcement of Premarital Agreements and How We Think about Marriage, 40 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 145 (1998).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, A Suggested Antenuptial Agreement: A Proposal in Wake of Avitzur, 7 J. Halacha & Contemporary Soc’y 25 (1984).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, In Vitro Fertilization: Questions of Maternal Identity and Conversion, 25 Tradition 82 (1991).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, In Vitro Fertilization: Questions of Maternal Identity and Conversion, in Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies 46 (Feldman, Emanuel & Wolowelsky, Joel B. eds., 1997).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, Mitochondrial DNA Replacement: How Many Mothers?, 48 (4) Tradition (2015).Google Scholar
Bleich, J. David, Survey of Recent Halakhic Periodical Literature: Kiddushei Taut: Annulment as a Solution to the Agunah Problem, 33 Tradition 90 (1998).Google Scholar
Blumberg, J., Munahim Mishpati’im Aravi’im mi-Dine ha-Kinyan be-Geonim uve-Rambam, 14–15 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 61 (1988–89) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Borten, Laurence Drew, Sex, Procreation, and the State Interest in Marriage, 102(4) Columbia L. Rev. 1089 (2002).Google Scholar
Boyle-Lewicki, Edna, Need World’s Collide: The Hudad Crimes of Islamic Law and International Human Rights, 13 N.Y. Int’l L. Rev. 43 (2000).Google Scholar
Breault, Adam M., “Onan’s Transgression”: The Continuing Legal Battle over Prisoners’ Procreation Rights, 66 Albany L. Rev. 289 (2002).Google Scholar
Breitowitz, Irving, The Plight of the Agunah: A Study in Halacha, Contract, and the First Amendment, 51 Md. L. Rev. 312 (1992).Google Scholar
Brewer, David I., Jewish Women Divorcing Their Husbands in Early Judaism: The Background to Papyrus Se’elim 13, 92(3) Harvard Theological Rev. 349 (1999).Google Scholar
Brody, Robert, Is the Ketubba of Biblical or of Rabbinic Origin, Neti’ot Ledavid: Jubilee Volume for David Weiss Halivni 37 (Elman, Yaakov et al. eds., 2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., A Proposed Tripartite Prenuptial Agreement to Solve the Agunah Problem: A Solution without Any Innovation, 20 Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Child Custody in Jewish Law: A Pure Law Analysis, www.jlaw.com/Articles/childcus2.html.Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Cloning People: A Jewish Law Analysis of the Issues, 3 0 Conn. L. Rev. 503 (1998).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Error in the Creation of Marriages in Modern Times under Jewish Law, 22 Dine Israel 39 (English Section) (2003).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Genetically Engineering People: A Jewish Law Analysis of Personhood, 13 St. Thomas L. Rev. 877 (2001).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Review Essay: An Unsuccessful Defense of the Bet Din of Rabbi Emanuel Rackman: The Tears of the Oppressed by Aviad Hacohen, Edah J. 4:2 (2004), www.edah.org/backend/journalarticle/4_2_broyde.pdf.Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., Some Thoughts on New York State Regulation of Jewish Marriage: Covenant, Contract or Statute?, 5 Fam. in Law 55 (2011).Google Scholar
Broyd, Michael J., The Establishment of Maternity and Paternity in Jewish and American Law, 3 Nat’l Jewish L. Rev. 117 (1988).Google Scholar
Büchler, Adolf, Das judische Verlobins und die Stellung der verlobeten eines Priesters im ersten unt zweiten Jahrhundert, in Festschrift zu Israel Lewy’s siebzigstem Geburtstag 110 (Brann, M. und Elbogen, J. eds., 1911).Google Scholar
Byrn, Mary Patricia & Holzer, Erica, Codifying the Intent Test, 41 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 130 (2015).Google Scholar
Carbone, June & Cahn, Naomi, Marriage, Parentage, and Child Support, 45 Fam. L.Q. 219 (2011).Google Scholar
Cherlow, Yuval, Protection of the Surrogate Mother – Ethics, Law and Halacha, 4 J. Health L. & Bioethics 80 (2011) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Cherry, Kristen, Marriage and Divorce Law in Pakistan and Iran: The Problem of Recognition 9 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int’l L. 319 (2001).Google Scholar
Cheruvu, Padmini, Three-Parent IVF and Its Effect on Parental Rights, 6 Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J. 73 ( 2014 ).Google Scholar
Chezem, Linda L. & Nagy, Sarah L., Judicial Abrogation of a Husband’s Paternity: Can a Third Party Seek to Establish Paternity over a Child Born into a Marriage while That Marriage Remains Intact?, 30 Ind. L. Rev. 467 (1997).Google Scholar
Choueka, Aharon, The Controversy Concerning the Takkanah of Tuletula Regarding the Husband’s Inheritance of His Wife’s Estate, 68(1) Tarbiz 87 (1999) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Coester-Waltjen, Dagmar & Coester, Michael, Formation of Marriage in Persons and Family, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law vol. 4, 6 (Glendon, Mary A. ed., 1997).Google Scholar
Cohben, Aryeh, Giddul’s Wife and the Power of the Court: On Talmudic Law, Gender, Divorce and Exile, 9 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women’s Stud. 197 (1999–2000).Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz, Conditions in Jewish and Roman Law, in Wolfson Jubilee Volume English Section 203 (Saul Lieberman ed., 1965).Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz, On the Theme of Betrothal in Jewish and Roman Law, 18 Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 67 (1948).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Glenn, Intentional Diminishment, the Non-Identity Problem, and Legal Liability, 60 Hastings L.J. 347 (2008).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Glenn, Regulating Reproduction: The Problem with Best Interests, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 423 (2011).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacques & Alikani, Mina, The Biological Basis for Defining Bi-Parental or Tri-Parental Origin of Offspring from Cytoplasmic and Spindle Transfer, 26(6) Reproductive BioMedicine Online 535 (2013).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeremy, Intention in Sexual Relations According to Twelfth- and Thirteenth-Century Rabbinical Opinion, 13 Teudah 155 (1997) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Cohen, Yedidya, The Inheritance of a Wife of Her Husband in the Communal Enactments, 6–7 Shenaton ha-Mishpat Ha-Ivri 133 (1979–80) (Heb).Google Scholar
Cooper Davis, Peggy, The Good Mother: A New Look at Psychological Parent Theory, 22 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 347 (1996).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, On the Question of Legal Parentage in Israel (Children Born through an Artificial Birth Technique), in An Unusual Pregnancy: A Multi-Disciplinary Study of In Vitro Fertilization 137 (Almog, Shulamit & Ben-Zeev, Avinoam eds., 1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, Should Equality Be Implemented in the Laws of Parents and Children?, 2 Kiryat Hamishpat 131 (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Corinaldi, Michael, The Legal Status of a Child Born of Artificial Means from a Sperm Donor or an Egg Donor, 18–19 Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Haivri 295 (1992–94) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Curtis, Carolyn, The Psychological Parent Doctrine in Custody Disputes between Foster Parents and Biological Parents, 16 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 149 (1980).Google Scholar
Dallas, Traci, Rebutting the Marital Presumption: A Developed Relationship Test, 88 Colum. L. Rev. 369 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’alton-Harrison, Rita, Mater Semper Incertus Est: Who’s Your Mummy?, 22(3) Med. L. Rev. 357 (2014).Google Scholar
Daudpota, U. M. & Fyzee, Asaf A. A., Notes on Mut’a or Temporary Marriage in Islam, 8 JBBRAS 79 (1932).Google Scholar
Davis, Dena S., Religious Attitudes toward Cloning: A Tale of Two Creatures, 27 Hofstra L. Rev. 509 (1999).Google Scholar
De Seife, Rodolphe J.A., Muhammad Khalid Masud, Brinkley Messick and Powers, David S. eds., Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas, 42 Am. J. Legal Hist. 84 (1998).Google Scholar
Dichovsky, Shlomo, Child Support – A Special Enactment in Charity Laws, 16 Techumin 87 (1996) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dichovsky, Shlomo, The Parental Obligation to Support Adoptive Children, 15 Techumin 278 (1995) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dimond, Rebecca, Social and Ethical Issues in Mitochondrial Donation, 115(1) Br. Med. Bull. 173 (2015).Google Scholar
Divon, Ido, The Obligation of an Adopting Father to Pay the Child Support Due to His Undertaking, 9 Dinei Israel 184 (1978–80) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Dorff, Elliot N., Human Cloning: A Jewish Perspective, 8 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 117 (1998).Google Scholar
Drori, Moshe, International Jurisdiction of the Rabbinical Courts in Israel, 24 Justice 30 (2006).Google Scholar
Edrei, Arye, The beit din’s prerogatives in marital law, 21 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 1 (1998–2000) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Moshe, The Onah Obligation: An Ordinary Obligation or the Essence of the Marriage, 2 Hemdat haAretz 42 (2002).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, “Up to the Ears” in Horses’ Necks (BM 108a): On Sasanian Agricultural Policy and Private “Eminent Domain,” 3 JSIJ 95 (2004).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Acculturation to Elite Persian Norms and Modes of Thought in the Babylonian Jewish Community of Late Antiquity, Neti’ot Ledavid 31 (2004).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Marriage and Marital Property in Rabbinic and Sasanian Law, in Rabbinic Law in Its Roman and Near Eastern Context 227 (Hezser, Catherine ed., 2003).Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Middle Persian Culture and Babylonian Sages: Accommodation and Resistance in the Shaping of Rabbinic Legal Tradition, in The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature 165 ( 2007 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Yaakov, Returnable Gifts in Rabbinic and Sasanian Law, VI Irano-Judaica 139 (2008).Google Scholar
Elrod, Linda D., A Child’s Perspective of Defining a Parent: The Case for Intended Parenthood, 25 BYU J. Pub. L. 245 (2011).Google Scholar
Epstein, J. N., Notes to the Jewish-Aramaic Papyri of Aswan, in Studies in Talmudic Literature and Semitic Languages vol. 1, 320 (Melamed, Ezra Z. ed., 1984) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Estin Ann, Laquer, Embracing Tradition: Pluralism in American Family Law, 63 Md. L. Rev. 540 (2004).Google Scholar
Evans-Grubbs, Judith, Abduction Marriage in Antiquity: A Law of Constantine (CTh IX.24.1) and Its Social Context, 79 J. Roman Stud. 59 (1989).Google Scholar
Falk, Ze’ev W., Mutual Obligations in the Ketubah, 8 Journal of Jewish Studies 215 (1957).Google Scholar
Ferber, Zeev, The Mother Sharing in Paying Child Support, 27 Techumin 273 (2007) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Fleishman, Josef, Socio-Legal Aspects of Genesis 34, 13 Shenaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 141 (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Fleishman, Josef, The Inheritance of a Mother’s Dowry in Ancient Near East Law and in Ancient Jewish Law, 23 Dine Israel 95 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Flusser, David & Safrai, Shmuel, In the Image of the Form of His Likeness, in Isaac Leo Seeligmann Volume, Essays on the Bible and the Ancient World vol. 2 (Hebrew Section), 453 (Rofe, Alexander & Zakovitch, Yair eds.,1983) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Fournier, Pascale, The Erasure of Islamic Difference in Canadian and American Family Law Adjudication, 10 J.L. & Pol’y 51 (2001).Google Scholar
Francus, Israel, And Again, When a Man Betroths a Woman, He Does so under the Conditions Laid down by the Rabbis, 77 Sinai 91 (1975) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Francus, Israel, Mahloket Kadmonim Be-Din Vittur Ha-Ba‘al Lareshet Et Ishto, 106 Sinai 97 (1990).Google Scholar
Freidenreich, David M., The Use of Islamic Sources in Saadiah Gaon’s “Tafsīr” of the Torah, 93(3/4) Jewish Q. Rev. 353 (2003).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Halakha as Evidence of Sexual Life among Jews in Muslim Countries in the Middle Ages, 45 Peamim 89 (1991) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Ketubot from Eretz Israel from the Geonic Period 1 Te‘udah 58 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Divorce upon the Wife’s Demand as Reflected in Manuscripts from the Cairo Geniza, 4 Jewish Law Annual 103 (1981).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., On the Relationship between Karaite and Palestinian Ketubot from the Genizah, 15 Teu‘dah 145 (1956) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Polygamy – New Information from the Genizah, 43 Tarbitz 166 (1974) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordecai A., Termination of Marriage upon the Wife’s Request: A Palestinian Ketubba Stipulation, 37 PAAJAR 29 (1969).Google Scholar
Friedman, Shamma, A Good Story Deserves Retelling – The Unfolding of the Akiva Legend, 3 JSIJ 55 (2004).Google Scholar
Gafni, Isaiah. M., The Institution of Marriage in Rabbinic Times, in The Jewish Family: Metaphor and Memory 13 (Kraemer, David ed., 1989).Google Scholar
Ghodsi, Tamilla F., Tying a Slipknot: Temporary Marriages in Iran, 15 Mich. J. Int’l L. 645 (1994).Google Scholar
Ghori, Safiya, The Application of Religious Law in North American Courts: A Case Study of Muta Marriages, 10(1) J. Islamic L. & Culture 29 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilat, Israel Z., Is the “Benefit of the Child” a Major Criterion according to Jewish Law in a Parental Conflict of the Child?, 8 Bar Ilan L. Stud. 297 (1990) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Glennon, Theresa, Somebody’s Child: Evaluating the Erosion of the Marital Presumption of Paternity, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. 547 (2000).Google Scholar
Goldfeder, Mark, The Adoption of Children in Judaism and in Israel: A Conceptual and Practical Review, 22 Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 321 ( 2014 ).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Anne, Determination of Legal Parentage in Egg Donation, Embryo Transplantation, and Gestational Surrogacy Arrangements, 1992 Fam. L.Q. 275 (1992).Google Scholar
Goren, Shlomo, The Ketubah in the Babylonian Talmud and in the Palestinian Talmud, 3 Torah She-Be’al Peh 119 (1961) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Graham, Laura P., The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act and Modern Social Policy: The Enforceability of Premarital Agreements Regulating the Ongoing Marriage, 28 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1037 (1993).Google Scholar
Graves, Alison E., Women in Iran: Obstacles to Human Rights and Possible Solutions 5 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 57 (1996).Google Scholar
Grazi, Richard V. & Wolowelsky, Joel B., On Foetal Ovary Transplants 40 Le’ela (1995).Google Scholar
Green, Yosi, Artificial Insemination (AID) in Israeli Court Judgments and Legislation, 5 Assia 125 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Green, Yosi, Post Modern Procreation by Means of IVF and Ibum and Haliza, 2 Netanya Academic College L. Rev. 207 (2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Greenberg-Kobrin, Michelle, Civil Enforceability of Religious Prenuptial Agreements, 32 Columbia J.L. & Social Problems 359 (1991).Google Scholar
Guidice, Richard, Procreation and the Prisoner: Does the Right to Procreate Survive Incarceration and Do Legitimate Penological Interests Justify Restrictions on the Exercise of the Right, 29 Fordham Urban L.J. 2277 (2002).Google Scholar
Gulak, Asher, Deed of Betrothal and Oral Stipulation in Talmudic Law, 3 Tarbitz 361 (1932) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Haeri, Shahla, An Islamic Discourse on Female Sexuality: Temporary Marriage in Postrevolutionary Iran, in In the Eye of the Storm: Women in Postrevolutionary Iran 98–114 (Afkhami, Mahnaz & Friedl, Erika eds., 1994).Google Scholar
Haeri, Shahla, Temporary Marriage and the State in Iran: An Islamic Discourse on Female Sexuality, 59 Soc. Res. 201 (1992).Google Scholar
Haeri, Shahla, The Institution of Mut`a Marriage in Iran: A Formal and Historical Perspective, in Islam Critical Concepts in Sociology vol. 3 Gender and the Family 154–72 (Turner, Bryan S. ed., 2003).Google Scholar
Halperin, Mordechai, The Definition of Parenthood and the Right to Find Biological Roots in Moral Dilemmas in Medicine 161 (Cohen-Almagor, Raphael ed. 2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Halperin-Kaddari, Ruth & Yadgar, Yaacov, Between Universal Feminism and Particular Nationalism: Politics, Religion and Gender (In)Equality in Israel, 31(6) Third World Q. 905 (2010).Google Scholar
Hamoudi Haider, Ala, Sex and the Shari’a: Defining Gender Norms and Sexual Deviancy in Shi’i Islam, 39 Fordham Int’l L.J. 25 ( 2015 ).Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine, Contest and Consent: A Legal History of Marital Rape, 88 California L. Rev. 1375 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashiloni-Dolev, Yael, Posthumous Reproduction (PHR) in Israel: Policy Rationales versus Lay People’s Concerns, a Preliminary Study, 39(4) Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 634 (2015).Google Scholar
Heffening, Willi, Mut’a in Encyclopaedia of Islam vol. 7, 757–59 (Bosworth, C.E. et. al eds., 1960)Google Scholar
Helmholz, Richard H., Support Orders, Church Courts, and the Rule of Filius Nullius: A Reassessment of the Common Law, 63 Va. L. Rev. 431 (1977).Google Scholar
Her, Moshe D., Marriage from a Socio-Economic Halakhic Perspective, in Mishpahot Beit Yisrael 37 (1976) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hershberg, A. S., Yofya ve-Hityafuta shel ha-Isha bi-Zman ha-Talmud, 4 He-Atid 1 (1923) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hershler, Moshe, Test-Tube Babies According to Halakha, 4 Halakha & Med. 90 (1985) (Heb.)Google Scholar
Hershler, Moshe, Test-Tube Babies According to Halakha, 1 Halakha & Med. 307 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hill, John L., What Does It Mean to Be a “Parent”? The Claims of Biology as the Basis for Parental Rights, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 353 (1991).Google Scholar
Hirschberg, Haim Z., Le-Heker Rav Sadya Gaon ve-Tequfato, 31 Tarbiz 415 (1962) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, H., In the Book of Megilat Starim, in Festschrift zum siebzigsten Geburtstage A. Berliner’s: Gewidmet von Freunden und Schulern, the Hebrew section 46 (1903) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Hjerrild, Bodil, Islamic Law and Sasanian Law, in Law and the Islamic World: Past and Present 49 (Toll, Christopher & Skovgaard-Petersen, Jakob eds., 1995).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Simon, A New Autograph Fragment of Maimonides’ Hilkhot Ha-Yerushalmi, 28 J. Semitic Stud. 273 (1983).Google Scholar
Horner, Amanda, I Consented to Do What?: Posthumous Children and the Consent to Parent After-Death, 33 S. Ill. U. L.J. 157 (2008).Google Scholar
Howard, I. K. A., Mut’a Marriage Reconsidered in the Context of the Formal Procedures for Islamic Marriage, XX(1) J. Semitic Stud. 82 (1975).Google Scholar
Ilan, Mordechai, A Woman Relinquishing Her Right for Maintenance, 3 Techumin 123 (1982) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Indig, Yizhak, The Problem of Support of a Child Born of Artificial Insemination, 2 Dinei Israel 83 (1971) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, ARTs and the Prohibition of Seed Destruction: Three Methods in the Modern Psika, 7 Identites 21 (2015) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, Public and Private Rulings in Jewish Law (Halakhah): Flexibility, Concealment, and Feminist Jurisprudence, 3(1) J.L. Religion & State 25 (2014).Google Scholar
Irshai, Ronit, Toward a Gender Critical Approach to the Philosophy of Jewish Law (Halakhah), 26(2) J. Feminist Stud. in Religion 55 (2010).Google Scholar
Israeli, Shaul, Fatherhood by Artificial Means, 33 Torah She-Be’alpe 41 (1992) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., Agunah and the Problem of Authority: Directions for Future Research 1 Melilah 1, 8 (2004).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., How Jewish Is Jewish Family Law?, LV/2 J. Jewish Stud. 201 (2004).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., Mishpat Ivri, Halakhah and Legal Philosophy: Agunah and the Theory of “Legal Sources,” 1 JSIJ 69 (2002).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S., Some Reflections on Family Law in the Papyri, XIV Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 141 (Gamoran, Hillel ed., 2002).Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S. & Westreich, Avishalom, Book Review of Aviad Hacohen, The Tears of the Oppressed, an Examination of the Agunah Problem: Background and Halachic Sources, 17 Jewish Law Annual 303 (2007).Google Scholar
Jacobs, Melanie B., Why Just Two? Disaggregating Traditional Parental Rights and Responsibilities to Recognize Multiple Parents, 9 J.L. Fam. Stud. 309 (2007).Google Scholar
Jensen, Brent J., Comment, Artificial Insemination and the Law, 1982 BYU L. Rev. 935 (1982).Google Scholar
Jones, Caroline & Holme, Ingrid, Relatively (im)Material: mtDNA and Genetic Relatedness in Law and Policy, 9:4 Life Sci. Soc’y & Pol’y (2013).Google Scholar
Kahser, Asa, “Planned Orphanhood”: The Balanced Picture, in Moral Dilemmas in Medicine 161 (Cohen-Almagor, Raphael ed., 2002) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Diane S., Why Truth Is Not a Defense in Paternity Actions, 10 Tex. J. Women & L. 69 (2000).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Yehiel S., Child Custody in Jewish Law: From Authority of the Father to the Best Interest of the Child, 24(1) J.L. & Religion 89 (2008/2009).Google Scholar
Katz, Gail A., Parpalaix c. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology, 11 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 683 (1998).Google Scholar
Kaye, Alexander, Eliezer Goldman and the Origins of Meta-Halacha, 34.3 Modern Judaism 309 (2014).Google Scholar
Khan, Shahnaz, Race, Gender, and Orientalism: Muta and the Canadian Legal System, 8 Can. J. Women & L. 249 (1995).Google Scholar
Khatib-Chahidi, Jane, Sexual Prohibitions, Shared Space and Fictive Marriages in Shi’ite Iran, in Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps 112 (Ardener, Shirley ed., 1981).Google Scholar
King, Alexa E., Solomon Revisited: Assigning Parenthood in the Context of Collaborative Reproduction, 5 UCLA Women’s L.J. 329 (1995).Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick Lacey, Walter, “Patria Potestas,” in The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives 121 (Rawson, Beryl ed., 1987).Google Scholar
Kister, Menachem, Kedat Moshe veYehudai: On the History of a Legal-Religious Term, in Atara L’Haim: Studies in the Talmud & Medieval Rabbinic Literature in Honor of Prof. Haim Zalman Dimitrovsky 202 (Boyarin, Daniel et al. eds., 2000) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Kisthardt, Mary K., Of Fatherhood, Families and Fantasy: The Legacy of Michael H. V. Gerald D., 65 Tul. L. Rev. 585 (1991).Google Scholar
Kleinman, Ron S., Contemporary Halakhic Decisors, Commercial Practices, and Civil Law, 19 The Review of Rabbinic Judaism 78 (2016).Google Scholar
Kleinman, Ron S. & Jabareen, Amal, Transfer of Ownership in E-Commerce Transactions from the Perspective of Jewish Law: In Light of Israeli and American Law, in The Oxford Handbook of Judaism and Economics 499 (Levine, Aaron ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Knapland, Kristine S., Synthetic Cells, Synthetic Life, and Inheritance, 45 Val. U. L. Rev. 1361 (2011).Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Heather, The Intended Parent: The Power and Problems Inherent in Designating and Determining Intent in the Context of Parental Rights, 119 Penn St. L. Rev. 801 (2015).Google Scholar
Koll, Perri, The Use of the Intent Doctrine to Expand the Rights of Intended Homosexual Male Parents in Surrogacy Custody Disputes, 18 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 199 (2011).Google Scholar
Kovach, Rachel L., Sorry Daddy – Your Time Is Up: Rebutting the Presumption of Paternity in Louisiana, 56 Loy. L. Rev. 651 ( 2010 ).Google Scholar
Labovitz, Gail, Review of Melanie Landau, Tradition and Equality: Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination, 4(1) Religion & Gender 70 (2014), www.religionandgender.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/rg.9491/.Google Scholar
Ladomato, Dominique, Protecting Traditional Surrogacy Contracting through Fee Payment Regulation, 23 Hastings Women’s L.J. 245 ( 2012).Google Scholar
Lasker, Daniel J., Saadya Gaon on Christianity and Islam, in The Jews of Medieval Islam: Community, Society, and Identity 165 (Frank, Daniel ed., 1995).Google Scholar
Lau, Israel M., The Halakhic Ramifications of Sexual Relationships before Marriage, 27 Torah She-Be’alpe 84 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela, Gestation: Work for Hire or the Essence of Motherhood? A Comparative Legal Analysis, 9 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol’y 91 ( 2002).Google Scholar
Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela, The Lost Children: When the Right to Children Conflicts with the Rights of Children, 8 L. & Ethics Hum. Rts. 219 (2014).Google Scholar
Legge, Michael et al., Numerical Identity: The Creation of Tri-Parental Embryos to Correct Inherited Mitochondrial Disease, 126(1385) New Zealand Med. J. (Online) 71 (2013).Google ScholarPubMed
Levin, Yael, Freeing One Agunah is Like Rebuilding One of the Ruins of Supernal Jerusalem, 23 Dine Israel 163 ( 2005).Google Scholar
Levmor, Rachel, Pre-Nuptial Agreements with the Aim of Preventing the Husband’s Refusal to Give a Get, 23 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 127 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Levmor, Rachel, Rabbinic Responses in Favor of Prenuptial Agreements, 42(1) Tradition 29 (2009).Google Scholar
Levmor, Rachel, The Prenuptial Agreement for the Prevention of GET-Refusal, https://iyim.org.il/wp-content/…/07/Article-The-Prenuptial-Agreement.doc.Google Scholar
Lewis, Browne, Two Fathers, One Dad: Allocating the Paternal Obligations between the Men Involved in the Artificial Insemination Process, 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 949 (2009).Google Scholar
Lewis, Naphtali, Katzoff, Ranon & Greenfield, Jonas C., Papyrus Yadin 18, 37 Israel Exploration J. 229 (1987).Google Scholar
Libson, Gideon, Halakhah and Reality in the Gaonic Period: Taqqanah, Minhag, Tradition and Consensus: Some Observations, in The Jews of Medieval Islam: Community, Society, and Identity 67 (Frank, Daniel ed., 1995).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Berachyahu, The Theoretical Basis of the Condition in Jewish Law, 4 Mishpatim 636 (1973) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Shahar, Neither Nature nor Contract: Toward an Institutional Perspective on Parenthood Essay, 8 L. & Ethics Hum. Rts. 297 ( 2014 ).Google Scholar
Lipschutz, Joshua H., To Clone or Not to Clone – A Jewish Perspective, 25 J. Med. Ethics 105 (1999).Google Scholar
Lowy, Simeon, The Extent of Jewish Polygamy in Talmudic Times, 9 J. Jewish Stud. 115 (1958).Google Scholar
Macuch, Maria, Die Zeitehe im Sasanidischen Recht – ein Vorlaufer der shi’itischen mut’a-Ehe in Iran?, 18 Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 187 (1985).Google Scholar
Malinowitz, Chaim Z., The 1992 New York Get Law: An Exchange, 31(3) Tradition 23 (1997).Google Scholar
Malka, David, Hithayyavut shel ha-Isha lifne ha-Nisuin le-Kabel Get, 8 Shurat ha-Din 360 (2003) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Marcus, Tali, It Takes (Only) Two to Tango? Recognizing More than Two Parents for One Child 44 Hebrew U. L.J. 415 (2014) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Artificial Insemination from Donor (AID) – From Status to Contract and Back Again?, 21(1) Boston U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 69 (2015).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Bridging the Gap between Intent and Status: A New Framework for Modern Parentage, 15 (1) Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, From Baby M to Baby M(anji): Regulating International Surrogacy Agreements, 24 (1) J.L. & Pol’y 41 (2016).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, In Defense of Surrogacy Agreements: A Modern Contract Law Perspective, 20 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 423 (2014).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Intentional Parenthood: A Solution to the Plight of Same-Sex Partners Striving for Legal Recognition as Parents, 12 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 39 (2013).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Marriage According to the Law of Moses and Israel – Between Family Law and Contract Law (forthcoming, 2018).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, On the Dispositive Foundations of the Obligation of Spousal Conjugal Relations in Jewish Law, XVIII JLAS 161 (2008).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, Scarce Medical Resources – Parenthood at Every Age, in Every Case and Subsidized by the State?, 9 Netanya Academic College L. Rev. 191 ( 2014 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, The Rise, Fall and Rise Again of the Genetic Foundation for Legal Parentage Determination, 3 J. Health L. & Bioethics 125 (2010) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel, To Be or Not to Be (A Parent)? – Not Precisely the Question: The Frozen Embryo Dispute, 18 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 355 (2012).Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel & John, Loike, The New Frontier of Advanced Reproductive Technology: Reevaluating Modern Legal Parenthood, 37 Harvard J.L. & Gender 107 (2014).Google Scholar
Matsumura, Kaiponanea T., Public Policing of Intimate Agreements, 25 Yale J.L. & Feminism 159 (2013).Google Scholar
Mazeh, Yoav, The Religious Law of Child Support, the Supreme Court’s Case-Law and the Practice of Courts: Between Myth and Reality, Haifa L. Rev. (forthcoming, 2018) (Heb.).Google Scholar
McMillen, Michael J. T., Islamic Business and Commercial Law: Contractual Enforceability Issues: Sukuk and Capital Markets Development, 7 Chi. J. Int’l L. 427 (2007).Google Scholar
McMillen, Michael J. T., Islamic Shari’ah-Compliant Project Finance: Collateral Security and Financing Structure Case Studies, 24 Fordham Int’l L.J. 1184 ( 2001 ).Google Scholar
Meislin, Bernard, Jewish Law of Marriage in American Courts, 11 J. Fam. L. 271 (1971–72).Google Scholar
Miller, Kristin J., Human Rights of Women in Iran: The Universalist Approach and the Relativist Response 10 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 779 (1996).Google Scholar
Mintz, Adam, A Courageous Proposal: The First Heter Agunah in America, 4 JOFA J. 14 (2007).Google Scholar
Moosa, Ebrahim, The Child Belongs to the Bed: Illegitimacy and Islamic Law, in Questionable Issue: Illegitimacy in South Africa (Burman, Sandra & Preston-Whyte, Eleanor eds., 1992).Google Scholar
Moscovitz, Leib, Sugyot Muhlafot in the Talmud Yerushalmi , 60 Tarbiz 19 (1991) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Murakami, Charla, Parent-Child Relations: A Comparison of Jewish and California Law, 1 U.C. Davis J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 107 (1995).Google Scholar
Nix, Jesse M., “You Only Donated Sperm”: Using Intent to Uphold Paternity Agreements, 11 J.L. & Fam. Stud. 487 ( 2009 ).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Raymond C., The Momentum of Posthumous Conception: A Model Act, 25 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol’y 332 (2009).Google Scholar
Oller, Jason, Can I Get That in Writing?: Established and Emerging Protections of Paternity Rights [In re K.M.H., 169 P.3d 1025 (Kan. 2007)], 48 Washburn L.J. 209 (2008).Google Scholar
Orenbach, Kenneth B., The Religiously Distinct Director: Infusing Judeo-Christian Business Ethics into Corporate Governance, 2 Charlotte L. Rev. 369 (2010).Google Scholar
Orenstein, Gedalia, In Vitro Fertilization – Lineage of the Child and Fulfilling the Mitzvah of Procreation, 24 Techumin 156 (2004) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Oryn, Theodor, Remarks on the Duty of the Mother to Participate in the Maintenance of Her Child, 34 Hapraklit 308 (1982) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Pence, Gregory, What’s So Good about Natural Motherhood? (In Praise of Unnatural Gestation) in Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction 77 (Gelfand, Scott & Shook, John R. eds., 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perikhanian, Anahit, Iranian Society and Law, 3(2) Cambridge History of Iran 627 (Sharter, Ehsan Y. ed., 1983).Google Scholar
Picard, Ariel, The Proposal of Rabbi Uzziel for Resolving the Agunah Problem, in Rabbi Uzziel and His Peers: Studies in the Religious Thought of Oriental Rabbis Twentieth-Century Israel 230 (Zohar, Zvi ed., 2009) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Pollack, Daniel et al., Classical Religious Perspectives of Adoption Law, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 693 (2004).Google Scholar
Povarsky, Chaim, Regulating Advanced Reproductive Technologies: A Comparative Analysis of Jewish and American Law, 29 U. Tol. L. Rev. 409 (1998).Google Scholar
Purvis, Dara E., Intended Parents and the Problem of Perspective, 24 Yale J.L. & Feminism 210 (2012).Google Scholar
Rabinovitz, Zvi M., Friedman, M. A., Jewish Marriage in Palestine – A Cairo Geniza Study, I-II, Tel Aviv and New York 1980–1, 55 Tarbiz 456 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Radzyner, Amihai, Gittin – Mitzvot That Depend on Eretz Israel? Prenuptial Agreement for Avoiding Get Refusal: Between America and Israel (forthcoming, 2018, on file with author).Google Scholar
Rae, Scott B., Parental Rights and the Definition of Motherhood in Surrogate Motherhood, 3 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women’s Stud. 219 (1994).Google Scholar
Rakover, Nahum, Coercive Marital Relations between a Man and His Wife, 6–7 Shnaton ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri 295 (1979–80) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Rao, Radhika, Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Threat to the Traditional Family, 47 Hastings L.J. 951 (1996).Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Manfred, Status, Contract and the Welfare State, 23 Stan. L. Rev. 941 (1971).Google Scholar
Reichman, Edward, The Halakhic Chapter of Ovarian Transplantation, 31(1) Tradition 31 (1998) .Google Scholar
Reichman Schiff, Anne, Arising from the Dead: Challenges of Posthumous Procreation, 75 N.C. L. Rev. 901 (1997).Google Scholar
Reinitz, Yaakov, Appointing a Female Apotropos, 4 Bar Ilan L. Stud. 167 (1986) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Reinitz, Yaakov, The Apotropos of Orphans Who Are Supported by the Owner, 1 Bar Ilan L. Stud. 219 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Richardson, Christopher F., Islamic Finance Opportunities in the Oil and Gas Sector: An Introduction to an Emerging Field, 42 Tex. Int’l L.J. 119 (2006).Google Scholar
Riskin, Shlomo, Hafka’at Kiddushin: Towards Solving the Aguna Problem in Our Time, 36(4) Tradition 1 (2002).Google Scholar
Roberts, Paula, Truth and Consequences: Part I. Disestablishing the Paternity of Non-Marital Children, 37 Fam. L.Q. 35 (2003).Google Scholar
Robertson, John A., Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Family, 47 Hastings L.J. 911 (1996).Google Scholar
Rodgers-Miller, Brooke D., Out of Jahiliyya: Historic and Modern Incarnations of Polygamy in the Islamic World, 11 Wm. & Mary J. of Women & L. 541 (2005).Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Irit, Being Fruitful and Multiplying: Legal, Philosophical, Religious, and Medical Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Israel and Internationally, 36 Suffolk Transnat’l L. Rev. 627 (2013).Google Scholar
Rosner, Fred, In Vitro Fertilization, Surrogate Motherhood, and Sex Organ Transplants Symposium: Reproductive Rights, 25 Creighton L. Rev. 1669 (1991–92).Google Scholar
Rostain, Tanina, Permissible Accommodations of Religion: Reconsidering the New York Get Statute, 96(5) Yale L.J. 1147 (1987).Google Scholar
Roth, Rachel, No New Babies?: Gender Inequality and Reproductive Control in the Criminal Justice and Prison Systems, 12 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 391 (2004).Google Scholar
Runner, Brenda J., Protecting a Husband’s Parental Rights When His Wife Disputes the Presumption of Legitimacy, 28 J. Fam. L. 115 (1989–90).Google Scholar
Ryzman, Zvi, Ovary Transplantion – Is It Forbidden as Sterilization?, 31 Techumin 38 ( 2011 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Sabreen, Mudasra, Parentage: A Comparative Study of Islamic and Pakistani Law, 1(2) Frontiers of Legal Research 21 (2013).Google Scholar
Sackin, Jessica S., The Halakhic/Constitutional Argument for Human Reproductive Cloning in America, 7 Geo. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 627 (2009).Google Scholar
Salaymeh, Lena, Every Law Tells a Story: Orthodox Divorce in Jewish and Islamic Legal Histories, 4(1) UC Irvine L. Rev. 19 (2014).Google Scholar
Satlow, Michael L., Slipping Toward Sacrament: Jews, Christians and Marriage, in Jewish Culture and Society under the Christian Roman Empire 65 (Kalmin, Richard & Schwartz, Seth eds, 2003).Google Scholar
Scheiber, Alexander & Hahn, Yizhak, (Manuscript) Leaves from Se’adya’s Sefer Hamizwot, 28 Tarbiz 48 (1959) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Schereschewsky, Ben Zion, “Apotropos” in The Principles of Jewish Law 219 (Elon, Menachem ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Schereschewsky, Ben Zion, “Mamzer” in The Principles of Jewish Law 435–38 (Menachem Elon ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Schereschewsky, Ben Zion, “Parent and Child” in The Principles of Jewish Law 424–29 (Elon, Menachem ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Schiff Reichman, Anne, Solomonic Decisions in Egg Donation: Unscrambling the Conundrum of Legal Maternity, 80 Iowa L. Rev. 265 (1995).Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, Elisha, [on] Z. W. Falk, The Divorce Action by the Wife in Jewish Law, 6 Dine Israel 303 (1975) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Schremer, Adiel, How Much Jewish Polygyny in Roman Palestine?, 63 Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 181 (2001).Google Scholar
Schremer, Adiel, Papyrus Se’elim 13 and the Question of Divorce Initiated by Women in Ancient Jewish Halakhah, 63 Zion 377 (1998) (Heb.)Google Scholar
Schultz, Jessica H., Development of Ectogenesis: How Will Artificial Wombs Affect the Legal Status of a Fetus or Embryo?, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 877 (2010).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gedalia D., Comments on the New York State “Get Law” – Jewish Law?: Examining Halacha, Jewish Issues and Secular Law (1994), www.jlaw.com/Articles/get_law1.html.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Laura J., Religious Matching for Adoption: Unraveling the Interests Behind the “Best Interests” Standard, 25 Fam. L.Q. 171 (1991).Google Scholar
Segal, Peretz, Jewish Law during the Tannaitic Period, in An Introduction to the History and Sources of Jewish Law 137 (Neil S. Hecht et al. eds., 1996).Google Scholar
Septimus, Zvi & Selaymeh, Lena, Temporalities of Marriage: Jewish and Islamic Legal Debates, in Talmudic Transgressions: Essays in Honor of Daniel Boyarin 201 (Rosen-Zvi, Ishay et al., 2017).Google Scholar
Shagar, , Mitzvat Onah, in And He Named Them Adam: Love and Relationships from a New Jewish Point of View 193 (Maor, Zohar ed., 2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shapira, Amos, Normative Regulation of Reproductive Technologies in Israel, 13 Nova L. Rev. 609 (1989).Google Scholar
Shawa, Menashe, Maintenance of Minor Children in Jewish and Positive Law, 13 Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 289 (2002).Google Scholar
Shiber, Yair, The Halakhic-Legal Status of a Living Being Born by Genetic Cloning, 16 Bekhol Derakhekha Daehu, Journal of Torah and Scholarship 45 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, Establishing Parenthood for a Child Born through Artificial Insemination, 10 Hebrew U. L.J. 63 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, Family Law in Israel: The Struggle between Religious and Secular Law, 24 Isr. L. Rev. 537 (1990).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, The New Agunah: Religious Divorce in Israel, 6 Alei Mishpat 27 (2007) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, The Status of the Unmarried Parent in Israel Law, 12 Isr. L. Rev. 194 (1977).Google Scholar
Shtober, Shimon, Al Shte She’elot she-Hufnu el Rabenu Avraham ben ha-Rambam (referring to a slave – Pilegesh), 6–7 Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Haivri 399 (1979–80).Google Scholar
Shultz, Marjorie M., Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy, 70 Cal. L. Rev. 204 (1982).Google Scholar
Shultz, Marjorie M., Reproductive Technology and Intent-Based Parenthood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality, 1990 Wis. L. Rev. 297 (1990).Google Scholar
Sikaitis, Joline F., A New Form of Family Planning? The Enforceability of No-Child Provisions in Prenuptial Agreements, 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 335 (2004).Google Scholar
Silber, Sherman J., Judaism and Reproductive Technology, 156 Cancer Treat Res. 471 (2010).Google Scholar
Silberg, Moshe, Law and Morals in Jewish Jurisprudence, 75 Harv. L. Rev. 306 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Daniel B., Assisted Reproduction in Jewish Law, 30 Fordham Urb. L.J. 71 (2002).Google Scholar
Soloveitchik, Yosef B., The Marriage, in Family Redeemed: Essays on Family Relationships vol. 1, 31 (Shatz, David & Wolowelsky, Joel B. eds., 2000).Google Scholar
Son, Hyun Jee, Artificial Wombs, Frozen Embryos, and Abortion: Reconciling Viability’s Doctrinal Ambiguity, 14 UCLA Women’s L.J. 213 (2005).Google Scholar
Squillace, Lynn M., Too Much of a Good Thing: Toward a Regulated Market in Human Eggs, 1 J. Health & Biomed. L. 135 (2005).Google Scholar
Stigall, Dan E., Iraqi Civil Law: Its Sources, Substance, and Sundering, 16 J. Transnat’l L. & Pol’y 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., Parenthood by Pure Intention: Assisted Reproduction and the Functional Approach to Parentage, 53 Hastings L.J. 597 (2002).Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., “The Phantom Children of the Republic”: International Surrogacy and the New Illegitimacy, 20 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 561 (2012).Google Scholar
Stumpf, Andrea E., Redefining Mother: A Legal Matrix for New Reproductive Technologies, 96 Yale L.J. 187 (1986).Google Scholar
Swift, Katherine M., Parenting Agreements, the Potential Power of Contract, and the Limits of Family Law, 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 913 (2007).Google Scholar
Tachibana, Masahito et al., Towards Germline Gene Therapy of Inherited Mitochondrial Diseases, 493(7434) Nature 627 (2013).Google Scholar
Tacy, Kimberly J., Islamic Finance: A Growing Industry in the United States, 10 N.C. Banking Inst. 355 (2006).Google Scholar
Temple, Gregg, Freedom of Contract and Intimate Relationships, 8 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 121 (1985).Google Scholar
Tiefenbrun, Susan W., The Semiotics of Women’s Human Rights in Iran, 23 Conn. J. Int’l L. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Tikachinski, Michal & Rachel, Sperber-Frankel, Tazhiram min ha-Pilegesh, 17 Akdamot 67 (2006).Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi H., “A Jewish and Democratic State”: Reflections on the Fragility of Israeli Secularism, 41 Pepp. L. Rev. 1091 (2014).Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi H., Freedom from Religion in Israel: Civil Marriages and Cohabitation of Jews Enter the Rabbinical Courts, 27(2) Israel Stud. Rev. 1 (2012).Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi H., The Gendered Racial Formation: Foreign Men, “Our” Women, and the Law, 30 Women’s Rts. L. Rep. 479 ( 2008–09).Google Scholar
Villareale, Catherine, The Case of Two Biological Intended Mothers: Illustrating the Need to Statutorily Define Maternity in Maryland, 42 U. Balt. L. Rev. 365 (2013).Google Scholar
Voinarevich, Olga, A Fairy Tale Interrupted: The Long-Term Impacts of Child Marriage in Yemen and the Necessary Adjustments to Both Local and International Laws to Stop the Practice and to Protect Voiceless Child Brides, 16 Rutgers Race & L. Rev. 203 (2015).Google Scholar
Wald, Deborah H., The Parentage Puzzle: The Interplay between Genetics, Procreative Intent, and Parental Conduct in Determining Legal Parentage, 15 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 379 (2007).Google Scholar
Warhaftig, Itamar, The Legal Validity of Reliance on Oral Promise in Jewish Law, 2 Bar-Ilan L. Stud. 45 (1982) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Warhaftig, Zerach, To the Sources of the Obligation of Child Support, 1 Techumin 255 (1980) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Warmflash, Lawrence M., The New York Approach to Enforcing Religious Marriage Contracts: From Avitzur to the Get Statute, 50 Brook. L. Rev. 229 (1983–84).Google Scholar
Warzynski, Vanessa L., Termination of Parental Rights: The “Psychological Parent” Standard, 39 Vill. L. Rev. 737 (1994).Google Scholar
Weiss, Susan M., Sign at Your Own Risk: The RCA Prenuptial May Prejudice the Fairness of Your Future Divorce Settlement, 6 Cardozo Women’s L.J. 49 (1999).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Give Me Children or Else I Am Dead: Orthodox Jewish Perspectives on Fertility, in Faith and Fertility: Attitudes towards Reproductive Practices in Different Religions from Ancient to Modern Times 205 (Blyth, Eric & Landau, Ruth eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Ovary Transplantion in Halachic Perspective, 31 Techumin 48 ( 2011 ) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Taking Sperm from an Unconscious Husband, 25 Tchumin 59 (2005) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, Technology in the Service of the First Mitzvah, 6 Ḥakirah, the Flatbush J. Jewish L. & Thought 259 (2008).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Gideon, The Helakhic Status of an Infertile Couple, 23 Tchumin 223 (2003) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Werber, Stephen J., Cloning: A Jewish Law Perspective with a Comparative Study of Other Abrahamic Traditions, 30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1114 ( 2000 ).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Changing Motherhood Paradigms: Jewish Law, Civil Law, and Society, 28 Hastings Women’s L.J. 97 (2017).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Divorce on Demand: The History, Dogmatics, and Hermeneutics of the Wife’s Right to Divorce in Jewish Law, 62 J. Jewish Stud. 340 (2011).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Hafka’at Kiddushin (Annulment of Marriage): Reexamination of an Old Debate, 27–28 Sidra 111 (2013) (Heb.) Annulment of Marriage (Hafka‘at Kiddushin): Re-examination of an Old Debate, http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/784513/11612805/1302165216787/Avishalom+Westreich+Annulment+of+Marriage+2008.pdf?token=76V70xZQdDv2JQcFEdSwZd0wP24%3D.Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Right to Divorce in Jewish Law: Between Politics and Ideology, 1 Int’l J. Jurisprudence Fam. 177 (2010).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, “Such Coercion Never Occurred to the Sages” (Nachmanides, Ketubot 63b) – Divorce Compulsion in the Mishnaic and Talmudic Laws of the Rebellious Wife, 25(2) Bar-Ilan L. Stud. 563 (2009).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, The Wife’s Right to Divorce in Jewish Law: History, Dogmatics and Hermeneutics, 62(2) J. Jewish Stud. 340 (2011).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Tradition and Equality in Jewish Marriage: Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination by Melanie Landau (review), 28 Nashim 147 (2015).Google Scholar
Westreich, Avishalom, Umdena as a Ground for Marriage Annulment: Between Mistaken Transaction (Kiddushei Ta’ut) and Terminative Condition, 20 Jewish L. Ass’n Stud. 330 (2010).Google Scholar
Westreich, Elimelech, The Legal-Historical Sources of the Parents Obligation to Maintain Their Children, 19 Dinei Israel 161 (1997) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Wieder, Jeremy & Riskin, Shlomo, Hafka’at Kiddushin: A Rebuttal, 36(4) Tradition 37 (2002).Google Scholar
Williams, Devon D., Over My Dead Body: The Legal Nightmare and Medical Phenomenon of Posthumous Conception through Postmortem Sperm Retrieval, 34 Campbell L. Rev. 181 (2012).Google Scholar
Witte, John & Nichols, Joel A., Marriage, Religion, and the Role of the Civil State: More Than a Mere Contract: Marriage as Contract and Covenant in Law and Theology, 5 U. St. Thomas L.J. 595 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolowelsky, Joel B. & Grazi, Richard V., Future Directions, in Richard V. Grazi, Overcoming Infertility 425–40 ( 2005 ).Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Barbara B., Hatching the Egg: A Child-Centered Perspective on Parents’ Rights, 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 1747 (1993).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, Dying to Be a Father: Legal Paternity in Cases of Posthumous Conception, 8 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol’y 47 (2007).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, If It Ain’t [Completely] Broke, Don’t Fix It: Determining Paternity According to the Genetic Information Law (Amendment no. 3), 2008, 3 Hukim – The Israeli Journal of Legislation 191 (2011) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, More Than One Mother: Determining Maternity for the Biological Child of a Female Same-Sex Couple – The Israeli View, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 115 (2008).Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, Whose Child Are You? The Israeli Paternity Regulation and Its Flaws, 46 Hapraklit 311 (2003) (Heb.).Google Scholar
Zohar, Zvi, Halakhic Positions Permitting Nonmarital Sexual Intimacy, 17 Akdamot 11 (2006). Teshuva le-Magivim, 17 Akdamot 77 (2006).Google Scholar
Developments in the Law: IV. Changing Realities of Parenthood: The Law’s Response to the Evolving American Family and Emerging Reproductive Technologies, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 2052 (2003).Google Scholar
Symposium: The New “Illegitimacy”: Revisiting Why Parentage Should Not Depend on Marriage, 20 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 347–740 (2012).Google Scholar
Blackburn-Starza, Antony, Germline in the Sand: The Ethics and Law of Engineering the Embryo, BioNews 836, Jan. 25, 2016.Google Scholar
Buxton, Jess, Genome Editing and CRISPR: The Science of Engineering the Embryo, BioNews 835, Jan. 18, 2016.Google Scholar
Jaiswal, Ritesh R., Three Parent IVF / Three Parent Baby, The Science, Feb 19, 2015, http://thescience.co.in/tag/three-parents-ivf/.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yehezkel & Loike, John, Follicular Transplants and Motherhood (unpublished manuscript, on file with author).Google Scholar
Ochert, Ayala, HFEA Grants Permission to Genetically Edit Human Embryos, BioNews 837, Feb. 1, 2016.Google Scholar
Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact: 11th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2015 (Ernesto Damiani et al. eds., 2015).Google Scholar
Pritchard, Sarah, Why the UK Should Be Leading the Discussion on Embryo Engineering, BioNews 834, Jan. 11, 2016.Google Scholar
Regev, David, Woman’s Dream to Have Child Fulfilled after Death, Ynet Magazine June 14, 2011, www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4081456,00.html.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Irit, The Biological Will – A New Paradigm in ART?, New Family Org. (Feb. 25, 2013), www.newfamily.org.il/en/4905/the-biological-will%E2%84%A2-%E2%80%93-a-new-paradigm-in-art/.Google Scholar
Ryzman, Zvi, Is a Cloned Kohen Permitted to Recite the Kohen’s Blessing? (Heb.), http://olamot.net/sites/default/files/ratz_katzvi/pdf/-_32.pdf.Google Scholar
Shapira, Yaakov, And Again, Would You Murder and Also Inherit?, 374 Weekly Parasha, Pinchas (2010), www.justice.gov.il/Units/MishpatIvri/Gilyonot/374.rtf.Google Scholar
Sheva Brenner, Bayla, Filling the Void: Creating Jewish Families through Adoption, http://ou.org.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/ja/5766/spring66/FillingVoid.pdf.Google Scholar
Shochetman, Eliav, Would You Murder and Also Inherit?, 302 Weekly Parasha, Bereshit (2008), www.daat.ac.il/mishpat-ivri/skirot/302-2.htm.Google Scholar
The Israeli Ministry of Health, The Public Commission for Revision of the Legislative Regulation of Fertility and Childbearing in Israel (2012), www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/BAP2012.pdf (Heb.).Google Scholar
The responsum of Asher Weiss concerning triple parent IVF following mitochondrial DNA replacement that was posted at http://en.tvunah.org/2013/12/29/triple-parent-ivf/.Google Scholar
U.S. Catholic Conference, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation, Donum Vitae ( 1987 ).Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Infertility: Medical and Social Choices 282 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Immigration Law Service 2d PSD FAM Iran, Immigration Law Service, Second Edition, February 2016 Update, Reciprocity Schedules and Country Document Finder, http://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/fees/reciprocity-by-country/IR.html.Google Scholar