Part II - Typology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2018
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Study of Word Stress and AccentTheories, Methods and Data, pp. 145 - 224Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Baerman, M. (1998). The evolution of prosodic constraints in Macedonian. Lingua 104(1), 57–78.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. (2012). Foot-conditioned phonotactics and prosodic constituency. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Bennett, R.(2013). The uniqueness of metrical structure: Rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano. Phonology 30(03), 355–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. and Harrison, S. P.. (1999). Trimoraic feet in Gilbertese. Oceanic Linguistics 38(2), 203–230.Google Scholar
Buller, B., Buller, E., and Everett, D. L.. (1993). Stress placement, syllable structure, and minimality in Banawá. International Journal of American Linguistics 59(3), 280–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bye, P. (1996). Scandinavian “level stress” and the theory of prosodic overlay. Nordlyd 24, 23–62.Google Scholar
Caballero, G. (2008). Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, K. (2001a). Predicting syllabicity and moraicity in Dihovo Macedonian. University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences 2(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, K.(2001b). Stress placement in Dihovo Macedonian. Ms., University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Davis, S. and Cho, Y.-M.. (2003). The distribution of aspirated stops and /h/ in American English and Korean: An alignment approach with typological implications. Linguistics 41(4), 607–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, D. L. (1996). Prosodic levels and constraints in Banawá and Suruwahá. Ms. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. Available as ROA-121 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Grijzenhout, J. (1990). Modern Icelandic foot formation. In Bok-Bennema, R. and Coopmans, P. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris, 53–62.Google Scholar
Groen, B. M. (1977). A Structural Description of the Macedonian Dialect of Dihovo: Phonology, Morphology, Texts, Lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1989). Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish. Phonology 6(01), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraguchi, S. (1977). The Tone Pattern of Japanese: An Autosegmental Theory of Tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, S.(1991). A Theory of Stress and Accent. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt, M. S. (1992). Vertical maximization and metrical theory. PhD dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
Hyde, B. (2015). Overlap, recursion and ternary constructions. Presentation at Workshop on Formal Typologies, Rutgers University, May 30.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31(2), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, J. (1990). Prosodic minimality in Japanese. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 26, 213–239Google Scholar
Itô, J. and Mester, A.. (2007). Prosodic adjunction in Japanese compounds. In Miyamoto, Y. and Ochi, M. (eds.) Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics (FAJL) 4. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 97–111.Google Scholar
Itô, J. and Mester, A.(2009a). The extended prosodic word. In Grijzenhout, J. and Kabak, B. (eds.) Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 135–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, J. and Mester, A.(2009b). The onset of the prosodic word. In Parker, S. (ed.) Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation. London: Equinox, 227–260.Google Scholar
Itô, J. and Mester, A.(2013). Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124, 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R. (1994). Ternary rhythm in alignment theory. Ms., University of Utrecht. Available as ROA-35 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Kager, R.(1996). On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In Kleinhenz, U. (ed.) Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 155–71.Google Scholar
Kager, R.(2012). Stress in windows: Language typology and factorial typology. Lingua 122(13), 1454–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, H. (1996). Syllable and accent in Japanese: Evidence from loanword accentuation. The Bulletin (Phonetic Society of Japan) 211, 71–82.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(1999). Mora and syllable. In Tsujimura, N. (ed.) The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics 1. Chichester: Blackwell, 31–61.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2001). Epenthetic vowels and accent in Japanese: Facts and paradoxes. In van de Weijer, J. and Nishihara, T. (eds.) Issues in Japanese Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 113–142.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2003). The syllable as a unit of prosodic organization. In Féry, C. and van de Vijver, R. (eds.) The Syllable in Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2006). Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116(7), 1140–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2012). Varieties of pitch accent systems in Japanese. Lingua, 122(13), 1395–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. and Prince, A. S.. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2), 249–336.Google Scholar
Lunt, H. G. (1952). A Grammar of the Macedonian Literary Language. Skopje: Državno knigoizdatelstvo.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V. (2012). Superfeet as recursion. In Arnett, N. and Bennett, R. (eds.)Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V.(2013). An exploration of minimal and maximal metrical feet. PhD dissertation, CASTL, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V. and Kager, R.. (2015). The binary-to-ternary rhythmic continuum in stress typology: Layered feet and non-intervention constraints. Phonology 32(3), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1982). Prosodic structure and expletive infixation. Language 58(3), 574–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Prince, A.. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, J. N., Dickey, L. W., and Urbanczyk, S. (eds.)University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 18). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, pp. 249–384.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D.(1978). What is a tone language? In Fromkin, V. (ed.) Tone: A Linguistic Survey. New York: Academic Press, 113–131.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. and Beckman, M. E.. (1988). Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poser, W. J. (1984). The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Poser, W. J.(1990). Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Language 66(1), 78–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A. S.(1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 511–562.Google Scholar
Rehg, K. L. (1993). Proto-Micronesian prosody. Oceanic Linguistics, Special Publications 24, 25–46.Google Scholar
Rice, C. (1992). Binarity and ternarity in metrical theory: Parametric extensions. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11(3), 563–605.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.(1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.(1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In Beckman, J., Dickey, L. Walsh, and Urbanczyk, S. (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory 18. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Shinohara, S. (2000). Default accentuation and foot structure in Japanese: Evidence from Japanese adaptations of French words. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9(1), 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, D. (1991). Solution to Palestinian Arabic stress. Class handout, University of California at Los Angeles. Google Scholar.Google Scholar
Suzuki, H. (1995). Minimal words in Japanese. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 31, 448–463.Google Scholar
Withgott, M. M. (1982). Segmental evidence for phonological constituents. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Yamada, E. (1990). Stress assignment in Tokyo Japanese (1) and (2). Fukuoka Daigaku Jinbun Ronsoo 21, 1575–1604; 22, 97–154.Google Scholar
References
Abney, S. P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W. (1984). Gemination in Italian. In Baldi, P. (ed.) Papers from the XIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 303–321.Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1944). Linguistique Générale et Linguistique Française, 2nd edn. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Beckman, J. (1998). Positional faithfulness: An optimality theoretic treatment of phonological asymmetries. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Berg, T. (2008). Emphatic stress shift in German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birtalan, Á. (2003). Oirat. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 210–228.Google Scholar
Bläsing, U. (2003). Kalmuck. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 229–247.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomhard, A. R. (2008). Reconstructing Proto-Nostratic: Comparative Phonology, Morphology, and Vocabulary, 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., and Goodwin, J. M.. (1996). Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Y. Y. and Inkelas, S.. (1994). Post-obstruent Tensification in Korean and geminate inalterability. In Kim-Renaud, Y.-K. (ed.) Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 45–60.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.(2012). The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 239–298.Google Scholar
Csató, É. Á. and Johanson, L.. (1998). Turkish. In Johanson, L. and Csató, E. A. (eds.) The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge, 203–235.Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, O. (2012). Geminate typology and the perception of consonant duration. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Donegan, P. J. and Stampe, D.. (1983). Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society, 337–353.Google Scholar
Downing, L. J. (2010). Accent in African languages. In Goedemans, R., van der Hulst, H., and van Zanten, E. (eds.) A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 381–427.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68, 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.(2005a). Prefixing versus suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 110–113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.(2005b). Order of object and verb. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 338–341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.(2005c). Order of adposition and noun phrase. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 346–349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.(2005d). Order of genitive and noun. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 350–353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.(2005e). Order of adverbial subordinator and clause. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 382–385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.) (2013). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. (1990). A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S(2008). A two-accent model of Japanese word prosody. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28, 29–48.Google Scholar
Fukumori, T. (2010). Torukogo-no akusento-ni tsuite [On the accent in Turkish]. Gengo Kenkyu 137, 41–63.Google Scholar
Georg, S. (2003a). Ordos. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages, London: Routledge 193–209.Google Scholar
Georg, S(2003b). Mongghul. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 286–306.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. and van der Hulst, H. (2005a). Fixed stress locations. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 62–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Goedemans, R. and van der Hulst, H.(2005b). Weight-sensitive stress. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 66–69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Goedemans, R., Heinz, J., and van der Hulst, Harry (2014). StressTyp2. http://st2.ullet.net.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2002). A factorial typology of quantity-insensitive stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3), 491–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowlett, D. (2003). Zone S. In Nurse, D. and Philippson, G. (eds.) The Bantu Languages. London: Routledge, 609–638.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1997). Does Altaic exist? In Hegedus, I., Michalove, P. A., and Manaster, A. Ramer, (eds.) Indo-European, Nostratic and Beyond: A Festschrift for Vitaly V. Shevoroshkin. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man, 88–93. (Reprinted in J. H. Greenberg. (2005). Genetic Linguistics. Oxford University Press, 325–330.)Google Scholar
Harn, R. F. (1998). Uyghur. In Johanson, L., and Csató, É. Á. (eds.) The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge, 379–396.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, M. (1990). Mongorugo-no kotoba-asobi [Wordplay in Mongolic]. In Eguchi, K., (ed.) Kotoba-asobi-no Minzokushi [Ethnography of Wordplay]. Tokyo: Taishukan, 283–293.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B.. (eds.) (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayata, T. (2005). Shogengo-no on-in-to nihongo-no on-in [Phonology in languages and phonology in Japanese]. In Hayata, T. (ed.) Sekai-no-naka-no Nihongo [Japanese Language in the World]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten, 1–22.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hugjiltu, W. (2003). Bonan. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 325–345.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der. (2011). Pitch accent systems. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., and Rice, K.. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Volume II: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Phonology. Chichester: Blackwell, 1003–1027.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der, Goedemans, R., and van Zanten, E.. (2010). A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Language of the World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, L. M. (ed.) Studies in Stress and Accent. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California, 37–82.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(1981). Tonal accent in Somali. Studies in African Linguistics 12(2), 169–203.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(2002). Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? Paper presented at the 9th International Phonology Meeting, Vienna, November 1. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/%7Ehyman/Hyman_Vienna_VH_paper_forma.pdf.Google Scholar
Ikegami, J. (1989). Tsunguusu-shogo. In Kamei, T., Kohno, R., and Chino, E. (eds.) Gengogaku Daijiten [The Sanseido Encyclopedia of Linguistics], vol. 2. Tokyo: Sanseido, 1068–1083.Google Scholar
Ikegami, J(1997). Uilta-go Jiten [A Dictionary of the Uilta Language Spoken on Sakhalin]. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press.Google Scholar
Janhunen, J. (2003). Proto-Mongolic. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 1–29.Google Scholar
Janhunen, J(2009). Proto-Uralic – what, where, and when? The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia = Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 258, 61–62.Google Scholar
Johanson, L. (1998a). The structure of Turkic. In Johanson, L. and Csató, É. Á. (eds.) The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge, 30–66.Google Scholar
Johanson, L(1998b). History of Turkic. In Johanson, L. and Csató, É. Á. (eds.) The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge, 81–125.Google Scholar
Kabak, B. and Vogel, I.. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18, 315–360.Google Scholar
Kara, G. (2011). Alliteration in Mongol Poetry. In Roper, J. (ed.) Alliteration in Culture. London: Palgrave, 156–179.Google Scholar
Kazama, S. (2011). Tungusu-shominzoku-no kosho-bungei-ni tsuite [The oral literatures of Tungusic languages]. Hokkaido-ritsu Hoppo-minzoku Hakubutsukan Kenkyu-kiyoo [The Hokaido Museum of Northern Peoples] 20, 25–54.Google Scholar
Kazama, S(2012). Nanai-no Minwa-to Densetsu [Nanay Folk Tales and Legends] 13. Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Kim, S. S. (2003). Santa. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 346–363.Google Scholar
Kircher, M. (1998). Kazakh and Karakalpak. In Johanson, L. and Csató, É. Á. (eds.) The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge, 318–332.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H., Takeyasu, H., and Giriko, M.. (2013). On the positional asymmetry of consonant gemination in Japanese loanwords. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22(4), 339–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuribayashi, H. (1988). Mongorugo-ni okeru jakkaboin-no hattatsu-to heionsetsuka-gensho [The development of reduced vowels and the change of syllabic structure in Mongolian]. Onsei-no Kenkyuu 22, 209–223.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A., Riad, T., and Jacobs, H.. 1999. Diachronic prosody. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 335–422.Google Scholar
Li, F. and Whaley, L. J.. (2000). Emphatic reduplication in Oroqen and its Altaic context. Linguistics 38, 355–372.Google Scholar
Meid, W. (1971). Das germanische Praeteritum: Indogermanische Grundlagen und Ausbreitung im Germanischen. Institut fur Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft der Universitat Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Miller, R. A. (1971). Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miyashita, H. and Tokizaki, H.. (2017). Ancrene Wisse ni okeru hondooshi-to mokutekigo-no sootaitekigojun-to shakunyuugo [Relative word order of the main verb and the object and loanwords in the Ancrene Wisse]. JELS 34, 98–104. The English Linguistic Society of Japan.Google Scholar
Mutaka, N. and Hyman, L. M.. (1990). Syllables and morpheme integrity in Kinande reduplication. Phonology 7, 73–119.Google Scholar
Myers, S. and Carleton, T.. (1996). Tonal transfer in Chichewa. Phonology 13, 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasu, A. (1999). Chouhukukei-onomatope-no kyouchou-keitai-to yuuhyousei [Emphatic forms of reduplicative mimetics and markedness]. Nihongo Nihon Bunka Kenkyuu [Studies on Japan and Japanese Culture] 9, 13–25.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I. and Tolskaya, M.. (2001). A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugteren, H. (2003). Shira Yughur. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 265–285.Google Scholar
Odden, D. (1999). Typological issues in tone and stress in Bantu. In Kaji, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Symposium Cross-Linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena: Tonogenesis, Typology, and Related Topics. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 187–215.Google Scholar
Orwin, M. (2011). Alliteration in Somali poetry. In Jonathan, R. (ed.) Alliteration in Culture. London: Palgrave, 219–230.Google Scholar
Pagel, M., Atkinson, Q. D., Calude, A. S., and Meadea, A.. (2013). Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. PNAS 110, 8471–8476.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1998). The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful history. Linguistic Typology 2, 195–230.Google Scholar
Polivanov, Y. D. [Полива́нов, Евге́ний Дми́триевич]. (1927). К вопросу о родственных отношениях корейского и “алтайских” языков [On the issue of family relations between Korean and “Altaic” languages]. Известия Академии наук СССР [Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR] 21 (7), 1195–1204.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, G. J. (1952–1966). Einführung in die Altaische Sprachwissenschaft [Introduction to Altaic Linguistics], 3 vols. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Robbeets, M. (2017). The Transeurasian languages. In Hickey, R. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 586–626.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. and d’Arcangeli, L.. (2004). Italian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34, 117–121.Google Scholar
Schiering, R. and van der Hulst, H. (2010). Word accent systems in the languages of Asia. In van der Hulst, H., Goedemans, R., and van Zanten, E. (eds.) A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 509–613.Google Scholar
Schönig, C. (1998). Azerbaijanian. In Johanson, L., and Csató, É. Á. (eds.) The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge, 248–260.Google Scholar
Shoolbraid, G. M. H. (1975). The Oral Epic of Siberia and Central Asia. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Sinor, D. (1968). Some remarks on Manchu poetry. In Sinor, Denis (ed.) Studies in South, East, and Central Asia: Presented as a Memorial Volume to the Late Professor Raghu Vira. New Delhi: International academy of Indian culture, 105–114.Google Scholar
Skribnik, E. (2003). Buryat. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 102–128.Google Scholar
Slater, K. W. (2003). Mangghuer. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 307–324.Google Scholar
Stampe, D.(1985). Rhyme and the holistic evolution of English. Handout of paper read at the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sunik, O. P. (1997). Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки [Tungusic-Manchurian languages]. In Алпатов, В. М., Кормушин, И. В., Пюрбеев, Г. Ц., and Романова, О. И. (eds.) Языки Мира: Монгольские Языки, Тунгусо-Маньчжурские Языки, Японскиий Язык, Корейский Язык [Languages of the World: Mongolian Languages, Tungus Languages, The Japanese Language, The Korean Language]. Москва: Издательство Индрик.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J.-O. (2003). Khalkha. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 154–176.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J.-O., Tsendina, A., Karlsson, A., and Franzén, V. (2005). The Phonology of Mongolian. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thurgood, G. (1993). Geminates: A cross-linguistic examination. In Ashmore Nevis, J., McMenamin, G., and Thurgood, G. (eds.) Papers in Honor of Frederick H. Brengelman on the Occasion of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Department of Linguistics, CSU Fresno. Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno, 129–139.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H. (2011a). Japanese as an accent and stress language. Paper presented at International Conference on Phonetics and Phonology (ICPP 2011), Kyoto University, December 14.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H(2011b). The nature of linear information in the mophosyntax-PF interface. English Linguistics 28, 227–257.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H(2013). Deriving the compounding parameter from phonology. Linguistic Analysis 38, 275–303.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H(2015). Stress and restrictiveness in phrase and compound. JELS 32, 346–352.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H(2017). Historical changes of word order and word stress in English. In Tokizaki, H. (ed.) Phonological Externalization, vol. 2. Sapporo University, 83–100.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H. and Fukuda, K.. (2013). A statistical association between head-complement orders and word-stress location. Paper presented at Association for Linguistic Typology 10th Biennial Conference. University of Leipzig, August 17.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H. and Kuwana, Y.. (2013). A stress-based theory of disharmonic word orders. In Biberauer, T. and Sheehan, M. (eds.) Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Word Orders. Oxford University Press, 190–215.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H. and Nasukawa, K.. (2014). Tone in Chinese: Preserving tonal melody in strong positions. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35, 31–46.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of Phonology, trans. Baltaxe, C. A.M.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsumagari, T. (1987). A Manchu wordplay in the Nišan Saman-i Bithe. Festschrift for Professor Park Eun-yong on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Hayang, Korea: Hyosung Women’s University Press, 567–576.Google Scholar
Tsumagari, T(1995). Tungusu-no kotoba-to bunka [Language and culture in Tungusic]. Toyogakuhoo [Studies in the East] 77, 167–169.Google Scholar
Tsumagari, T(1997). Linguistic diversity and national borders of Tungusic. In Shoji, H. (ed.) Senri Ethnological Studies 44: Northern Minority Languages: Problems on Survival. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 175–186.Google Scholar
Tsumagari, T(2003). Dagur. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 129–153.Google Scholar
Tsumagari, T(2009). A sketch of Solon grammar. Hoppo Jinbun Kenkyu [Journal of the Center for Northern Humanities, Hokkaido University] 2, 1–21. http://hdl.handle.net/2115/38236.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (2005). Weak triggers in vowel harmony. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23, 917–989.Google Scholar
Weiers, M. (2003). Moghol. In Janhunen, J. (ed.) The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge, 248–264.Google Scholar
Welmers, W. E. (1973). African Language Structures. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. (1996). Vowel systems of the Manchu-Tungus languages of China. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar