Book contents
- Rabbis and Classical Rhetoric
- Rabbis and Classical Rhetoric
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Translations and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Rabbis as Orators: The Setting and Structure of Rabbinic Homilies
- 2 Rabbis as Instructors: Rhetorical Arrangement and Reasoning in the Yerushalmi
- 3 The Agonistic Bavli: Greco-Roman Rhetoric in Sasanian Persia
- 4 Progymnasmata and Controversiae in Rabbinic Literature
- 5 Talmudic Topoi: Rhetoric and the Hermeneutical Methods of Midrash
- 6 The Role of Lawyers in Roman and Rabbinic Courts
- 7 Why Are There Lawyers in Heaven?
- Conclusion: Rabbinic versus Christian Approaches to Rhetoric
- Bibliography
- Index of Sources
- Index of Names and Subjects
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2017
Book contents
- Rabbis and Classical Rhetoric
- Rabbis and Classical Rhetoric
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Translations and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Rabbis as Orators: The Setting and Structure of Rabbinic Homilies
- 2 Rabbis as Instructors: Rhetorical Arrangement and Reasoning in the Yerushalmi
- 3 The Agonistic Bavli: Greco-Roman Rhetoric in Sasanian Persia
- 4 Progymnasmata and Controversiae in Rabbinic Literature
- 5 Talmudic Topoi: Rhetoric and the Hermeneutical Methods of Midrash
- 6 The Role of Lawyers in Roman and Rabbinic Courts
- 7 Why Are There Lawyers in Heaven?
- Conclusion: Rabbinic versus Christian Approaches to Rhetoric
- Bibliography
- Index of Sources
- Index of Names and Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rabbis and Classical RhetoricSophistic Education and Oratory in the Talmud and Midrash, pp. 288 - 318Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
`Aqrah, Abraham ben Don Shelomoh, ed. Me-harere nemerim. Venice: Bet Daniʼel Zaneṭi, 1599.Google Scholar
Aberbach, Moshe. Ha-ḥinukh ha-Yehudi bi-tqufat ha-Mishnah veha-Talmud. Jerusalem: Rubin Mass, 1982.Google Scholar
Ad Herennium. Translated by Caplan, Harry. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Aeneas of Gaza: Theophrastus with Zacharias of Mytilene: Ammonius. Translated by Bertz, Sebastian, Dillon, John, and Russell, Donald. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.Google Scholar
Albeck, Hanoch. Six Orders of Mishnah [Hebrew]. 6 vols. Jerusalem: Mossad Bialik, 1959.Google Scholar
Albeck, Hanoch, and Theodor, Judah. Midrash Bereshit Rabbah: Critical Edition with Notes and Commentary. Jerusalem: Shalem Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Alexander, Elizabeth Shanks. Transmitting Mishnah: The Shaping Influence of Oral Tradition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Hellenism and Hellenization as Problematic Historiographical Categories.” In Paul Beyond the Judaism/Hellenism Divide, edited by Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, 63–80. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Quid Athenis et Hierosolymis? Rabbinic Midrash and Hermeneutics in the Graeco-Roman World.” In A Tribute to Geza Vermes: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History, edited by Davies, P. R. and White, R. T., 101–24. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Alon, Gedaliah. The Jews in Their Land in the Talmudic Age (70–640 C.E.). Translated by Levi, Gershon. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Alon, Gedaliah. Jews, Judaism and the Classical World: Studies in Jewish History in the Times of the Second Temple and Talmud. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Anderson, Graham. The Second Sophistic: A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. New York, NY: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Angel, Joseph. “Damascus Document.” In Outside the Bible: Ancient Jewish Writings Related to Scripture, edited by Feldman, Louis, Kugel, James and Schiffman, Lawrence, 2975–3035. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 2013.Google Scholar
Anisfeld, Rachel. Sustain Me with Raisin-Cakes: Pesikta deRav Kahana and the Popularization of Rabbinic Judaism. Leiden: Brill, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, Alan. The Rabbis’ King-parables: Midrash from the Third-century Roman Empire. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse. Translated by Kennedy, George A.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Arnoff, Stephen Hazan. “Memory, Rhetoric, and Oral-Performance in Leviticus Rabbah.” PhD diss., Jewish Theological Seminary, 2011.Google Scholar
Arthurs, Jeffrey. “The Term Rhetor in Fifth- and Fourth-Century B.C.E. Greek Texts.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 23, no. 3/4 (1994): 1–10.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold. “Philo and John: Two Riffs on One Logos.” Studia Philonica Annual 17 (2005): 103–17.Google Scholar
Atzmon, Arnon. “‘The Same Fate Is in Store for the Righteous and the Wicked:’ Form and Content in Midreshei Aggadah.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 43 (2012): 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aune, David, ed. The Westminster Dictionary of New Testament and Early Christian Literature and Rhetoric. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Avery-Peck, Alan. “Rhetorical Argumentation in Early Rabbinic Pronouncement Stories.” In The Rhetoric of Pronouncement, edited by Robbins, Vernon, 49–69. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, Michael, and Gibson, Shimon. “Elusa.” Encyclopaedia Judaica (2007): 6:370–1.Google Scholar
Bacher, Wilhelm. Agadat Amora’e Ereṣ Yisrael. Translated by Rabinovits, A. Z.. Tel-Aviv: Dvir, 1930.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1981.Google Scholar
Ball, Warwick. Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Bar-Asher, Moshe. “On Corrections and Marginal Versions in Codex Parma B (De Rossi 497) of the Mishna.” [Hebrew]. In Segulla to Ariella, edited by Bar-Asher, Moshe, Fish, A. Harel, Idel, Moshe, Sarna, Nahum and Tobi, Yosef, 121–58. Jerusalem: Hoṣa’at Hamishpaḥa, 1990.Google Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Michal. Early Christian Monastic Literature and the Babylonian Talmud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Barker, Margaret. “The Paraclete.” In The Temple in Text and Tradition: A Festschrift in Honour of Robert Hayward, edited by McLay, R. T., 98–112. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Joseph. “The Heavenly Tribunal and the Personification of Ṣedeq in Jewish Apocalyptic.” In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, edited by Wolfgang Haase, Vol. 19.1, 219–39. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1979.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Joseph. “The Unwritten Law in the Pre-Rabbinic Period.” Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 3 (1972): 7–29.Google Scholar
Becker, Adam. “The Comparative Study of ‘Scholasticism’ in Late Antique Mesopotamia: Rabbis and East Syrians.” AJS Review 34, no. 1 (2010): 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Adam. Fear of God and the Beginning of Wisdom: The School of Nisibis and the Development of Scholastic Culture in Late Antique Mesopotamia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Adam. “Positing a ‘Cultural Relationship’ between Plato and the Babylonian Talmud.” Jewish Quarterly Review 101, no. 2 (2011): 255–69.Google Scholar
Bell, Jeremy. “‘Empeiria kai Tribe’: Plato on the ‘Art’ of Flattery in Rhetoric and Sophistry.” Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15, no. 2 (2011): 379–94.Google Scholar
Ben-Menahem, Hanina. Judicial Deviation in Talmudic Law. New York, NY: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
Ben-Shalom, Israel. “‘And I Took Unto Me Two Staves: The One I Called Beauty and the Other I Called Bands’ (Zakh. 11:7).” [Hebrew]. In Dor-Le-Dor: From the End of Biblical Times up to the Redaction of the Talmud. Studies in Honor of Joshua Efron, edited by Oppenheimer, A. and Kasher, A., 215–34. Jerusalem: Bialik, 1995.Google Scholar
Berger, Shlomo. Classical Oratory and the Sephardim of Amsterdam: Rabbi Aquilar’s “Tratado de la retorica.” Hilversum: Verloren, 1996.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Beth. Execution and Invention: Death Penalty Discourse in Early Rabbinic and Christian Cultures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Moshe, and Koyfman, Shlomo. “The Interpretation of Biblical Law in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Forms and Methods.” In Biblical Interpretation at Qumran, edited by Henze, Matthias, 61–87. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Bickerman, Elias. The Jews in the Greek Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bickerman, Elias. “La chaine de la tradition Pharisienne.” Revue Biblique 59 (1952): 44–54.Google Scholar
Black, Clifton. The Rhetoric of the Gospel: Theological Artistry in the Gospels and Acts. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Black, Clifton. “The Rhetorical Form of the Hellenistic Jewish and Early Christian Sermon: A Response to Lawrence Wills.” Harvard Theological Review 81, no. 1 (1988): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blidstein, Gerald. “Rabbinic Judaism and General Culture: Normative Discussion and Attitudes.” In Judaism’s Encounter with Other Cultures, edited by Schachter, Jacob J., 4–56. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, 1997.Google Scholar
Blum, Jost G. “Zum Bau von Abschnitten in Memre von Jacob von Sarug.” In III Symposium Syriacum, edited by Lavenant, R.. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Orientalium Studiorum, 1983.Google Scholar
Böhlig, Alexander. “Zur Rhetorik im Liber Graduum.” In IV Symposium Syriacum, edited by Drijvers, H.J.W. et al. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Studiorum Orientalium, 1987.Google Scholar
Bokser, Baruch. The Origins of the Seder: The Passover Rite and Early Rabbinic Judaism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bokser, Baruch. “Rabbinic Responses to Catastrophe: From Continuity to Discontinuity.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 50 (1983): 37–61.Google Scholar
Boman, Thorleif. Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek. New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 1960.Google Scholar
Bonner, Stanley F. Education in Ancient Rome. Berkley: University of California Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, Stanley F. Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. “The Analytical Language of John Wilkins.” In Selected Non-fiction, edited by Weinberger, Eliot, 229–32. New York, NY: Viking, 1999.Google Scholar
Borkowski, Andrew, and du Plessis, Paul. Textbook on Roman Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bowker, J. W. “Speeches in Acts: A Study in Proem and Yelammedenu Form.” New Testament Studies 14 (1967): 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. “The Gospel of the Memra: Jewish Binitarianism and the Prologue to John.” Harvard Theological Review 94, no. 3 (2001): 243–84.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. Ha-`iyun ha-Sefaradi: lefarshanut ha-Talmud shel megureshe Sefarad. Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben Zvi and Hebrew University, 1989.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. “Hellenism in Jewish Babylonia.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature, edited by Fonrobert, Charlotte and Jaffee, Martin, 336–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. Intertextuality and the Reading of Midrash. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. “Moslem, Christian, and Jewish Cultural Interaction in Sefardic Talmudic Interpretation.” Review of Rabbinic Judaism 5, no. 1 (2002): 1–33.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. “Shattering the Logos – or, The Talmuds and the Genealogy of Indeterminacy.” In The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman Culture III, edited by Schäfer, Peter, 273–99. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. Socrates and the Fat Rabbis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Brauw, Michael de. “The Parts of the Speech.” In A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, edited by Worthington, Ian, 187–202. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Bregman, Marc. “The Darshan: Preacher and Teacher of Talmudic Times.” The Melton Journal 14 (1982).Google Scholar
Bregman, Marc. “Mesorot u-meqorot qedumim be-sifrut Tanḥuma-yelamdenu.” Tarbiz 60 (1991): 269–74.Google Scholar
Bregman, Marc. “Revadei yeṣirah va-`arikha be-midreshei Tanḥuma-yelamdenu.” Proceedings of the Tenth World Congress for Jewish Studies C.1 (1990): 117–24.Google Scholar
Bregman, Marc. The Tanhuma-Yalammedenu Literature: Studies in the Evolution of the Versions. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bregman, Marc. “The Triennial Haftarot and the Perorations of the Midrashic Homilies.” Journal of Jewish Studies 32 (1981): 74–84.Google Scholar
Breuer, Yochanan. The Hebrew in the Babylonian Talmud according to the Manuscripts of Tractate Pesahim [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. “From Antagonism to Assimilation: Syriac Attitudes to Greek Learning.” In East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period, edited by Garsoian, Nina, Mathews, Thomas and Thomson, Robert, 17–34. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks, Center for Byzantine Studies, 1982.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian. “A Guide to Narsai’s Homilies.” Journal of Syriac Studies 12, no. 1 (2009): 21–40.Google Scholar
Brodsky, David. “From Disagreement to Talmudic Discourse: Progymnasmata and the Evolution of a Rabbinic Genre.” In Rabbinic Traditions between Palestine and Babylonia, edited by Nikolsky, Ronit and Ilan, Tal, 173–231. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Brody, Robert. The Geonim of Babylonia and the Shaping of Medieval Jewish Culture. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bruns, Gerald. Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Büchler, Adolf. “Learning and Teaching in the Open Air in Palestina.” Jewish Quarterly Review 4 (1914): 485–91.Google Scholar
Buelow, G. J. “Rhetoric and Music.” The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians 15 (1980): 793–808.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. “Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion.” In Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, edited by Furley, David and Nehemas, Alexander, 3–55. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Cabezón, José Ignacio, ed. Scholasticism: Cross-Cultural and Comparative Perspectives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Calderon, Ruth. A Bride for One Night: Talmudic Tales. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Brian, and Tritle, Lawrence, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Warfare in the Classical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Canpanton, Isaac ben Jacob, and al-Valensi, Shemuel. Darkhe ha-Talmud. Jerusalem: Isaak Lange, 1980.Google Scholar
Carson, D. A. “The Function of the Paraclete in John 16:7–11.” Journal of Biblical Literature 98, no. 4 (1979): 547–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattani, Adelino. “Subjectivist and Objectivist Interpretations of Controversy-based Thought.” In Controversies and Subjectivity, edited by Barrotta, Pierluigi and Dascak, Marcelo, 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 2005.Google Scholar
Chernick, Michael. Le-ḥeqer ha-midot “kelal u-ferat u-khelal” ve-“ribui u-mi`ut” ba-midrashim uva-talmudim. Lod: Habermann Institute for Literary Research, 1984.Google Scholar
Chernick, Michael. Midat “gezerah shavah”: ṣuroteha ba-Midrashim uva-Talmudim. Lod: Habermann Institute, 1994.Google Scholar
Chin, Catherine. “Rhetorical Practice in the Chreia Elaboration of Mara bar Serapion.” Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies 9, no. 2 (2006): 145–71.Google Scholar
Church, A. J., and Brodribb, W. J.. The Agricola and Germany of Tacitus and the Dialogue on Oratory. London: Macmillan, 1911.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Oratore. Translated by Sutton, E. W.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Cicero, . On Invention. Translated by Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Cicero, . Orator. Translated by Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Cicero, . The Speeches. Translated by Freese, John Henry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz. Jewish and Roman Law: A Comparative Study. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1966.Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz. Law and Tradition in Judaism. New York, NY: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1959.Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz. “Letter and Spirit in Jewish and Roman Law.” In Essays in Greco-Roman and Related Talmudic Literature, edited by Fischel, Henry, 138–64. New York, NY: Ktav, 1977.Google Scholar
Cohen, Norman. “Structure and Editing in the Homiletic Midrashim.” AJS Review 6 (1981): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Richard. “The Relationship Between Topic, Rhetoric and Logic: Analysis of a Syllogistic Passage in the Yerushalmi.” In Judaic and Christian Interpretation of Texts: Contents and Contexts, edited by Neusner, Jacob, 87–125. Lanham: University Press of America, 1987.Google Scholar
Cohen, Shaye. “Patriarchs and Scholarchs.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 48 (1981): 57–85.Google Scholar
Cohen, Shaye. “The Rabbis in Second-Century Jewish Society.” In The Cambridge History of Judaism. Vol. 3: The Early Roman Period, edited by Horbury, W., Davies, W. D. and Sturdy, J., 922–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Collins, John. Jewish Cult and Hellenistic Culture: Essays on the Jewish Encounter with Hellenism. Leiden: Brill, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, Thomas. “Philo’s Rhetoric: Argumentation and Style.” In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 21/1, edited by Temporini, H. and Haase, W., 343–71. Berlin and New York, NY: De Gruyter, 1984.Google Scholar
Consigny, Scott. “Edward Schiappa’s Reading of the Sophists.” Rhetoric Review 14, no. 2 (1996): 253–69.Google Scholar
Consigny, Scott. “Nietzsche’s Reading of the Sophists.” Rhetoric Review 13, no. 1 (1994): 5–26.Google Scholar
Corbett, Edward, and Connors, Robert. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Corrado, Michael Louis. “The Future of Adversarial Systems: An Introduction to the Papers from the First Conference.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 35 (2010): 285–96.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. “Violence and the Word.” In Narrative, Violence, and the Law: The Essays of Robert Cover, edited by Minow, Martha, Ryan, Michael and Sarat, Austin, 203–38. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Cribiore, Raffaella. Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Cribiore, Raffaella. The School of Libanius in Late Antique Antioch. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. Legal Advocacy in the Roman World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank Moore. From Epic to Canon. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “Alexandrian Methods of Interpretation and the Rabbis.” In Essays in Greco-Roman and Related Talmudic Literature, edited by Fischel, Henry, 165–82. New York, NY: Ktav, 1977.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “The Civil Law of the Mishnah: The Arrangement of the Three Gates.” In The Collected Works of David Daube, edited by Carmichael, Calum, 1:257–304. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1992.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “On the Third Chapter of the Lex Aquila.” Law Quarterly Review 52 (1936): 253–68.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “Rabbinic Methods of Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric.” Hebrew Union College Annual 22 (1949): 239–64.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “Texts and Interpretaions in Roman and Jewish Law.” In The Collected Works of David Daube, edited by Carmichael, Calum, 1:173–204. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1992.Google Scholar
De Vries, Benjamin. Meḥqarim be-sifrut ha-Talmud [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1968.Google Scholar
Deissmann, Adolf. Light from the Ancient East: The New Testament Illustrated by Recently Discovered Texts of the Graeco-Roman World. Translated by Strachan, Lionel R. M.. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers, 1927.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Diehm, James. “The Introduction of Jury Trials and Adversarial Elements into the Former Soviet Union and Other Inquisitorial Countries.” Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 11, no. 1 (2001): 1–38.Google Scholar
Dilts, Mervin R., and Kennedy, George A.. Two Greek Rhetorical Treatises from the Roman Empire: Introduction, Text and Translation of the Arts of Rhetoric Attributed to Anonymous Segeurianus and to Apsines of Gadara. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Dimant, Devorah. “Between Qumran Sectarian and Non-sectarian Texts: The Case of Belial and Mastema.” In The Dead Sea Scrolls and Contemporary Culture, edited by Roitman, Adolfo and Schiffman, Lawrence, 235–56. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Dohrmann, Natalie. “Reading as Rhetoric in Halakhic Texts.” In Of Scribes and Sages: Early Jewish Interpretation and Transmission of Scripture, edited by Evans, Craig, 90–114. London: T&T Clark International, 2004.Google Scholar
Dohrmann, Natalie, and Reed, Annette Yoshiko. “Rethinking Romanness, Provincializing Christendom.” In Jews, Christians, and the Roman Empire: The Poetics of Power in Late Antiquity, edited by Dohrmann, Natalie and Reed, Annette Yoshiko, 1–21. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dolgopolski, Sergey. What is Talmud?: The Art of Disagreement. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dutsch, Dorota. “Towards a Roman Theory of Theatrical Gesture.” In Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre, edited by Harrison, Georgy and Liaps, Vayos, 409–32. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Eilberg-Schwartz, Howard. “Myth, Inference and the Relativity of Reason: An Argument from the History of Judaism.” In Myth and Philosophy, edited by Reynolds, F. and Tracy, D., 247–86. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Eilberg-Schwartz, Howard. “When the Reader Is in the Write.” Prooftexts 7 (1987): 194–205.Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov. “The Babylonian Talmud in Its Historical Context.” In Printing the Talmud: From Bomberg to Schottenstein, edited by Mintz, Sharon Lieberman and Goldstein, Gabriel, 19–28. New York, NY: Yeshiva University Museum, 2005.Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov. “Orality and the Redaction of the Babylonian Talmud.” Oral Tradition 14, no. 1 (1999): 52–99.Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov. “The Order of Arguments in כלך-Baraitot in Relation to the Conclusion.” Jewish Quarterly Review 79 (1989): 295–304.Google Scholar
Elman, Yaakov. “Toward an Intellectual History of Sasanian Law: An Intergenerational Dispute in ‘Herbedestan’ 9 and Its Rabbinic and Roman Parallels.” In The Talmud in Its Iranian Context, edited by Bakhos, C. and Shayegan, M. R., 21–57. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
Encyclopedia Talmudit. Edited by Berlin, M. and Zevin, S. J.. Jerusalem: Talmudic Encylopedia Institute, 1946–2012.Google Scholar
Epstein, Y. N. Mevo’ot le-sifrut ha-Tannaim, Mishnah, Tosefta, u-midreshe halakha. Edited by Melamed, E. Z.. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Eshel, Esther. “Mastema’s Attempt on Moses’ Life in the ‘Pseudo-Jubilees’ Text from Masada.” Dead Sea Discoveries 10, no. 3 (2003): 359–64.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine. “The Contexts and Occasions of Roman Public Rhetoric.” In Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, edited by Dominik, William, 91–105. New York, NY: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Faur, José. Golden Doves with Silver Dots: Semiotics and Textuality in Rabbinic Tradition. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Faur, José. The Horizontal Society: Understanding the Covenant and Alphabetic Judaism. Boston, MA: Academic Studies Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Faur, José. “Retorica y Hemeneutica: Vico y la Tradicion Rabinica.” Translated by Ramirez, David. In Pensar para el nuevo siglo: Giambattista Vico y la cultura Europea, edited by Hidalto-Serna, E., 917–38. Napoli: La Città del Sole, 2001.Google Scholar
Faur, José. “The Splitting of the Logos: Some Remarks on Vico and the Rabbinic Tradition.” Poiesis: New Vico Studies 3 (1985): 85–103.Google Scholar
Feldman, Louis. Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World: Attitudes and Interactions from Alexander to Justinian. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Joseph. “An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law.” University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review 11 (2009): 53–83.Google Scholar
Fine, Steven. Art and Judaism in the Greco-Roman World: Toward a New Jewish Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Louis. Ha-Perushim ve-’anshe keneset ha-gedolah. New York, NY: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1950.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Louis. “The Oldest Midrash: Pre-Rabbinic Ideals and Teachings in the Passover Haggadah.” Harvard Theological Review 31, no. 4 (1938): 291–317.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Louis. Sifra on Leviticus [Hebrew]. 5 vols. Jerusalem: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1983–92.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Louis. Sifre on Deuteronomy [Hebrew]. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1969.Google Scholar
Fischel, Henry, ed. Essays in Greco-Roman and Related Talmudic Literature. New York, NY: Ktav, 1977.Google Scholar
Fischel, Henry, “Greek and Latin Languages, Rabbinical Knowledge of.” Encyclopaedia Judaica (2007): 8:57–9.Google Scholar
Fischel, Henry, “Story and History: Observations on Greco-Roman Rhetoric and Pharisaism.” In Essays in Greco-Roman and Related Talmudic Literature, edited by Fiscel, Henry, 443–72. New York, NY: Ktav, 1977.Google Scholar
Fischel, Henry, “Studies in Cynicism and the Ancient Near East: The Transformation of a ‘Chria’.” In Religions in Antiquity: Essays in Memory of Edwin Ramsdell Goodenough, edited by Neusner, Jacob, 372–411. Leiden: Brill, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischel, Henry, “The Transformation of Wisdom in the World of Midrash.” In Aspects of Wisdom in Judaism and Early Christianity, edited by Wilken, Robert, 67–101. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke University, 1989.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Rhetoric.” In Rhetoric in an Antifoundational World: Language, Culture, and Pedagogy, edited by Bernard-Donals, Michael and Glejzer, Richard, 33–64. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Flood, Emmet. “Augustine and the Classical Tradition of Rhetoric.” History of Education 11, no. 4 (1982): 237–50.Google Scholar
Fonrobert, Charlotte Elisheva. “Plato in Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai’s Cave (B. Shabbat 33b–34a): The Talmudic Inversion of Plato’s Politics of Philosophy.” AJS Review 31, no. 2 (2007): 277–96.Google Scholar
Fonrobert, Charlotte, and Jaffee, Martin, eds. The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Forbes, Christopher. “Paul and Rhetorical Comparison.” In Paul in the Greco-Roman World: A Handbook, edited by Sampley, J. Paul, 134–71. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2003.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Translated by Smith, A.M. Sheridan. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Fox, Robin Lane. The Classical World: An Epic History from Homer to Hadrian. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven. From Tradition to Commentary: Torah and Its Interpretation in the Midrash Sifre to Deuteronomy. Albany, NY: State University of New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven. “‘A Heart of Many Chambers’: The Theological Hermeneutics of Legal Multivocality.” Harvard Theological Review 108 (2015): 113–28.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven. “Looking for Legal Midrash at Qumran.” In Biblical Perspectives: Early Use and Interpretation of the Bible in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls, edited by Stone, Michael E. and Chazon, Esther, 59–79. Leiden: Brill, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraade, Steven. “Rabbinic Polysemy and Pluralism Revisited: Between Praxis and Thematization.” AJS Review 31, no. 1 (2007): 1–40.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven. “Response to Azzan Yadin-Israel on Rabbinic Polysemy: Do They ‘Preach’ What They Practice?” AJS Review 38 (2014): 339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraade, Steven. “Shifting from Priestly to Non-Priestly Legal Authority: A Comparison of the Damascus Document and the Midrash Sifra.” Dead Sea Discoveries 6, no. 2 (1999): 109–25.Google Scholar
Frank, David A. “Arguing with God, Talmudic Discourse, and the Jewish Countermodel: Implications for the Study of Argumentation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 41 (2004): 71–86.Google Scholar
Frank, David A. “The Jewish Countermodel: Talmudic Argumentation, the New Rhetoric Project, and the Classical Tradition of Rhetoric.” Journal of Communication and Religion 26 (2003): 163–94.Google Scholar
Frank, David A. “The New Rhetoric, Judaism, and Post-Enlightenment Thought: The Cultural Origins of Perelmanian Philosophy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 83 (1997): 311–31.Google Scholar
Friedman, Hershey. “Talmudic Humor and the Establishment of Legal Principles: Strange Questions, Impossible Scenarios, and Legalistic Brainteasers.” Thalia: Studies in Literary Humor 21, no. 1 (2004): 14–28.Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordechai A. Jewish Marriage in Palestine: A Cairo Genizah Study. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University, 1980.Google Scholar
Friedman, Shamma. “Ha-munaḥ ‘o kelakh le-derekh zo’ ve-shimusho be-midreshe ha-tannaim.” Sidra 9 (1993): 61–74.Google Scholar
Friedman, Shamma. “Pereq ha-isha rabbah ba-Bavli, be-ṣeruf mavo kelali `al derekh ḥeker ha-sugya.” In Mehkarim u-mekorot, edited by Dimitrovsky, H. Z.. New York, NY: Jewish Theological Seminary, 1977.Google Scholar
Friedman, Shamma. “Some Structural Patterns of Talmudic Sugyot.” [Hebrew] Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Jewish Studies 3 (1977): 389–402.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, Yair. “The ‘Agon’ with Moses and Homer: Rabbinic Midrash and the Second Sophistic.” In Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters, edited by Niehoff, Maren, 299–328. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Gafni, Isaiah. “`Al derashot be-ṣibur be-Bavel ha-talmudit: ha-pirqa.” In Kneset Ezra: sifrut ve-ḥayim be-bet ha-keneset, edited by Elitzur, Shulamit et al., 121–9. Jerusalem: Yad Yitzḥak ben Zvi, 1994.Google Scholar
Gafni, Isaiah. “Nestorian Literature as a Source for the History of the Babylonian Yeshivot.” [Hebrew] Tarbiz 51 (1982): 567–76.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gellius, Aulus. Noctes Atticae. Translated by Rolfe, J. C.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Gibson, Craig. Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2008.Google Scholar
Gilat, Yitzhak D. Studies in the Development of the Halakha [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Gilat, Yitzhak D. The Teachings of R. Eliezer Ben Hyrcanos and Their Position in the History of the Halakha [Hebrew]. Tel Aviv: Dvir, 1968.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. “The School in the Roman Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ginzberg, Louis. A Commentary on the Palestinian Talmud. 4 vols. New York, NY: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1941.Google Scholar
Ginzberg, Louis. Yerushalmi Fragments from the Genizah: Vol. I, Text with Various Readings from the Editio Princeps. Jerusalem: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1909.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Arnold. “Form-Analysis of Midrashic Literature as a Method of Description.” Journal of Jewish Studies 36 (1985): 159–74.Google Scholar
Goldin, Judah. “On Honi the Circle Maker: A Demanding Prayer.” In Studies in Midrash and Related Literature, edited by Eichler, Barry and Tigay, Jeffrey, 331–5. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 1988.Google Scholar
Goldin, Judah. Studies in Midrash and Related Literature. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 1988.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, E. D. Haggadah shel Pesaḥ: meqoroteha ve-toldoteha. Jerusalem: Mosad Bialik, 1969.Google Scholar
Goodblatt, David. “The End of Sectarianism and the Patriarchs.” In For Uriel: Studies in the History of Israel in Antiquity Presented to Professor Uriel Rappaport, edited by Mor, M., Pastor, J., Ashkenazi, Y. and Ronnen, I.. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History, 2005.Google Scholar
Goodblatt, David. The Monarchic Principle: Studies in Jewish Self-Government in Antiquity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1994.Google Scholar
Goodman, Martin, “The Roman State and the Jewish Patriarch in the Third Century.” In The Galilee in Late Antiquity, edited by Levine, Lee, 107–19. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1994.Google Scholar
Goodman, Martin, State and Society in Roman Galilee, A.D. 132–212. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1983.Google Scholar
Goren, Shlomo. Torat ha-Shabbat veha-mo`ed. Jerusalem: Ha-histadrut ha-Zionit ha-`Olamit, 1982.Google Scholar
Graetz, Heinrich. History of the Jews. 6 vols. Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1891–98.Google Scholar
Graf, Fritz. “Gestures and Conventions: The Gestures of Roman Actors and Orators.” In A Cultural History of Gesture, edited by Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H., 36–58. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Grano, Joseph. “The Adversarial-Accusatorial Label: A Constraint on the Search for Truth.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 20 (1996–7): 513–18.Google Scholar
Grayston, Kenneth. “The Meaning of Parakletos.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 13 (1981): 67–82.Google Scholar
Green, William Scott. “Romancing the Tome: Rabbinic Hermeneutics and the Theory of Literature.” Semia 40 (1987): 147–68.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, William. “How Do We Get from Corax-Tisias to Plato-Aristotle in Greek Rhetorical Theory?.” In Theory, Text, Context: Issues in Greek Rhetoric and Oratory, edited by Johnstone, Christopher, 19–44. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Grinhut, Eleazar ha-Levi. Sefer ha-liqutim: qoveṣ midrashim yeshanim u-ma’amarim shonim. Jerusalem, 1967.Google Scholar
Guttmann, Alexander. “Foundations of Rabbinic Judaism.” Hebrew Union College Annual 23 (1950–1951): 453–73.Google Scholar
Guttmann, Yechiel. “She’elot ’akademiot ba-Talmud.” Devir 1 and 2 (1923): 38–87 and 101–63.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Chaya. Law and Truth in Biblical and Rabbinic Literature. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Halbertal, Moshe. Interpretive Revolutions in the Making: Values as Interpretive Considerations in Midrashei Halakhah [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Halbertal, Moshe. People of the Book: Canon, Meaning, and Authority. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Halivni, David Weiss. The Formation of the Babylonian Talmud. Translated by Rubenstein, Jeffrey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Halivni, David Weiss. Meqorot u-mesorot. 6 vols. Tel Aviv: Dvir, and Jerusalem: Jewish Theological Seminary of America and Magnes, 1968–2003.Google Scholar
Halivni, David Weiss. Midrash, Mishnah, and Gemara: The Jewish Predilection for Justified Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hall, Edith. “Pantomime: Visualising Myth in the Roman Empire.” In Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre, edited by Harrison, George and Liaps, Vayos, 451–73. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. “Cicero and Quintilian on the Oratorical Use of Hand Gestures.” The Classical Quarterly 54, no. 1 (2004): 143–60.Google Scholar
Hallewy, Elimelekh E. “Concerning the Ban on Greek Wisdom.” [Hebrew] Tarbiz 41, no. 3 (1972): 269–74.Google Scholar
Hallewy, Elimelekh E. `Erkhe ha-aggadah veha-halakhah le’or meqorot Yevaniim ve-Latiniim. 4 vols. Tel-Aviv: Dvir, 1979.Google Scholar
Hallewy, Elimelekh E. `Olamah shel ha-aggadah: ha-aggadah le-’or meqorot Yevaniim. Tel-Aviv: Dvir, 1972.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Victor. “Satan.” In The Anchor Bible Dictionary, edited by Noel, David Freedman, 985–9, 1992.Google Scholar
Handelman, Susan. “Fragments of the Rock: Contemporary Literary Theory and the Study of Rabbinic Texts – A Response to David Stern.” Prooftexts 5 (1985): 75–95.Google Scholar
Handelman, Susan. The Slayers of Moses: The Emergence of Rabbinic Interpretation in Modern Literary Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principle, and Ideology. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Harris, Jay. How Do We Know This?: Midrash and the Fragmentation of Modern Judaism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Harris, Michael. “Consequentialism, Deontologism, and the Case of Sheva ben Bikhri.” The Torah u-Madda Journal 15 (2008–9): 68–94.Google Scholar
Harter-Uibopuu, Kaja. “The Trust Fund of Phaenia Aromation (IG V.1 1208) and Imperial Gytheion.” Studia Humaniora Tartuensia 5 (2004): 1–17.Google Scholar
Harvey, Zev Warren. “Rabbinic Attitudes Toward Philosophy.” In “Open Thou Mine Eyes …”: Essays on Aggadah and Judaica Presented to Rabbi William G. Braude on His Eightieth Birthday and Dedicated to His Memory, edited by Blumber, H., Braude, B., Mehlman, B., Gurland, J. and Gutterman, L., 83–101. Hoboken: Ktav, 1992.Google Scholar
Haut, Irwin. “Self-help in Jewish Law: Literary and Legal Analyses.” Diné Israel 17 (1993–4): 55–101.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine. “Displaced Self-Perceptions: The Deployment of ‘Mînîm’ and Romans in b. Sanhedrin 90b–91a.” In Religious and Ethnic Communities in Later Roman Palestine, edited by Lapin, Hayim, 249–89. Bethesda, MD: University Press of Maryland, 1998.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine. “Legal Realism and the Fashioning of Sectarians in Jewish Antiquity.” In Sects and Sectarianism in Jewish History, edited by Stern, Sacha, 119–46. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine. “Legal Truth, Right Answers and Best Answers: Dworkin and the Rabbis.” Diné Israel 25 (2008): 73–121.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine. “The ‘Other’ in Rabbinic Literature.” In The Cambridge Companion to Talmud and Rabbinic Literature, edited by Fonrobert, Charlotte Elisheva and Jaffee, Martin, 243–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine. “Theoretical Pluralism in the Talmud: A Response to Richard Hidary.” Diné Israel 26–7 (2009–10): 257–307.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine. What’s Divine about Divine Law? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hayman, Pinchas. “From Tiberias to Mehoza: Redactional and Editorial Processes in Amoraic Babylonia.” The Jewish Quarterly Review 93, no. 1–2 (2002): 117–48.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Theon and the History of the Progymnasmata.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 43, no. 2 (2002/3): 129–60.Google Scholar
Heger, Paul. The Pluralistic Halakhah: Legal Innovations in the Late Second Commonwealth and Rabbinic Periods. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Heine, Ronald. Origen: Scholarship in the Service of the Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. “The Amoraim of the Land of Israel as Artists of the Sermon.” [Hebrew] Hasifrut 25 (1977): 69–79.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. Derashot be-ṣibbur bi-tqufat ha-Talmud. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 1970.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. “Ha-petiḥot be-midreshe aggadah: meqoran ve-tafqidan.” World Congress for Jewish Studies 4, no. 2 (1969): 43–7.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. “‘Omanut ha-kompoziṣia be-midrash Vayikra Rabbah.” Hasifrut 2, no. 4 (1971): 808–43.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. Prayer in the Talmud: Forms and Patterns. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1977.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. “The Proem in the Aggadic Midrashim – A Form Critical Study.” In Scripta Hierosolymitana, 100–22, 1971.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph. “Profile of a Midrash: The Art of Composition in Leviticus Rabba.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 31 (1971): 141–50.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin. Judaism and Hellenism: Studies in Their Encounter in Palestine During the Early Hellenistic Period. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin. “Qumran and Hellenism.” In Religion in the Dead Sea Scrolls, edited by Collins, John and Kugler, Robert, 46–56. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Herman, Geoffrey. A Prince without a Kingdom: The Exilarch in the Sasanian Era. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Herr, Moshe David. “Synagogues and Theaters (Sermons and Satiric Plays).” [Hebrew]. In Knesset Ezra – Literature and Life in the Synagogue: Studies Presented to Ezra Fleischer, edited by Eliezer, S. et al., 105–19. Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi, 1994.Google Scholar
Hershler, Moshe, ed. Tractate Ketubot: The Babylonian Talmud with Variant Readings. Jerusalem: Mekhon haTalmud haYisre’eli haShalem, 1972.Google Scholar
Hezser, Catherine. “Die Verwendung der hellenistischen Gattung Chrie in frühen Christentum und Judentum.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 27 (1996): 371–439.Google Scholar
Hezser, Catherine. Form Function, and Historical Significance of the Rabbinic Story in Yerushalmi Neziqin. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1993.Google Scholar
Hezser, Catherine. “Interfaces Between Rabbinic Literature and Graeco-Roman Philosophy.” In The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman Culture II, edited by Schäfer, Peter, 161–87. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar
Hezser, Catherine. The Social Structure of the Rabbinic Movement in Roman Palestine. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997.Google Scholar
Hidary, Richard. “The Agonistic Bavli: Greco-Roman Rhetoric in Sasanian Persia.” In Shoshannat Yaakov: Jewish and Iranian Studies in Honor of Yaakov Elman, edited by Secunda, Shai and Fine, Steven, 137–64. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Hidary, Richard. “Classical Rhetorical Arrangement and Reasoning in the Talmud: The Case of Yerushalmi Berakhot 1:1.” AJS Review 34, no. 1 (2010): 33–64.Google Scholar
Hidary, Richard. Dispute for the Sake of Heaven: Legal Pluralism in the Talmud. Providence: Brown University, 2010.Google Scholar
Hidary, Richard. “Hellenism and Hermeneutics: Did the Qumranites and Sadducees Use Qal Va-ḥomer Arguments?” (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hidary, Richard. “‘One May Come to Repair Musical Instruments’: Rabbinic Authority and the History of the Shevut Laws.” Jewish Studies, an Internet Journal 13 (2015): 1–26.Google Scholar
Hidary, Richard. “The Rhetoric of Rabbinic Authority: Making the Transition from Priest to Sage.” In Jewish Rhetorics: History, Theory, Practice, edited by Bernard-Donals, Michael and Fernheimer, Janice, 16–45. Lebanon, NH: Brandeis University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hidary, Richard. “Right Answers Revisited: Monism and Pluralism in the Talmud.” Diné Israel 26 (2009): 229–55.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Marc. “The Greek Fathers and the Aggada on Ecclesiastes: Formats of Exegesis in Late Antiquity.” Hebrew Union College Annual 59 (1988): 137–64.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Marc. “The Preacher and His Public in Third-Century Palestine.” Journal of Jewish Studies 42 (1991): 108–14.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Marc. Torah for the Entire World [Hebrew]. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, 1999.Google Scholar
Hock, Ronald, and O’Neil, Edward. The Chreia in Ancient Rhetoric: Volume I. The Progymnasmata. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hüttenmeister, Gil. “Bet ha-kneset u-vet ha-midrash veha-ziqah benehem.” Catehdra 18 (1981): 38–44.Google Scholar
Ilievski, Viktor. “Language and Knowledge in Plato’s Cratylus.” Filozofija 35 (2013): 7–25.Google Scholar
Ish Shalom, Meir, ed. Mekhilta d’R. Ishmael `al sefer Shemot `im tosafot Me’ir `Ayin. Vienna, 1870.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Louis. Studies in Talmudic Logic and Methodology. London: Vallentine, Mitchell, and Co., 1961.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Louis. Teyku: The Unsolved Problem in the Babylonian Talmud. London: Cornwall Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Martin. “Theatres and Performances as Reflected in the Talmud Yerushalmi.” In The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman Culture I, edited by Schäfer, Peter, 327–47. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.Google Scholar
Jaffee, Martin. “The ‘Midrashic’ Proem: Towards the Description of Rabbinic Exegesis.” In Approaches to Ancient Judaism IV. Studies in Liturgy, Exegesis and Talmudic Narrative, edited by Green, William Scott, 95–112. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Jaffee, Martin. “The Oral-Cultural Context of the Talmud Yerushalmi: Greco-Roman Rhetorical Paideia, Discipleship, and the Concept of Oral Torah.” In The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman Culture I, edited by Schäfer, Peter, 27–61. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.Google Scholar
Jaffee, Martin. Torah in the Mouth: Writing and Oral Tradition in Palestinian Judaism 200 BCE–400 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Janowits, Naomi, and Lazarus, Andrew. “Rabbinic Methods of Inference and the Rationality Debate.” The Journal of Religion 72, no. 4 (1992): 491–511.Google Scholar
Janowitz, N. “Rabbis and Their Opponents: The Construction of the ‘Min’ in Rabbinic Anecdotes.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 6, no. 3 (1998): 449–62.Google Scholar
Jarratt, Susan. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Marcus. A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature. New York, NY: The Judaica Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Johansson, Mikael. Libanius’ Declamations 9 and 10. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2006.Google Scholar
Johnston, George. The Spirit-Paraclete in the Gospel of John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Christopher. “Greek Oratorical Settings and the Problem of the Pnyx: Rethinking the Athenian Political Process.” In Theory, Text, Context: Issues in Greek Rhetoric and Oratory, edited by Johnstone, Christopher, 97–127. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Jones, Christopher. “Multiple Identities in the Age of the Second Sophistic.” In Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic, edited by Borg, Barbara, 13–21. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.Google Scholar
Jospe, Raphael. “Yefet in the Tents of Shem: Attitudes Towards ‘The Wisdom of Greeks’.” In Tra Torah e sophia: orizzonti e frontiere della filosofia Ebraica, 119–66. Genova: Marietti, 2011.Google Scholar
Kafiḥ, Yosef. Mishnah with the Commentary of Rabbenu Moses ben Maimon [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1963–7.Google Scholar
Kahana, Menahem. “Kavvim le-toldot hitpatḥutah shel midat kelal u-frat bi-tkufat ha-Tannaim.” In Meḥqarim ba-Talmud uva-Midrash: sefer zikaron le-Tirza Lifshitz, edited by Bar-Asher, Moshe, Levinson, Joshua and Lifshitz, Berachyahu, 173–216. Jerusalem: Mossad Bialik, 2005.Google Scholar
Kahana, Menahem. Sifre on Numbers: An Annotated Edition [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kalmin, Richard. Jewish Babylonia between Persia and Roman Palestine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kalmin, Richard. Migrating Tales: The Talmud’s Narratives and Their Historical Context. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kaminka, Armand. “Hillel’s Life and Work.” The Jewish Quarterly Review 30, no. 2 (1939): 107–22.Google Scholar
Kanter, Shamai. Rabban Gamaliel II: The Legal Traditions. Ann Arbor, MI: Brown University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Katz, Claire Elise. Levinas, Judaism, and the Feminine: The Silent Footsteps of Rebecca. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Katz, Menachem. “Stories of Hillel’s Appointment as Nasi in the Talmudic Literature: A Foundation Legend of the Jewish Scholar’s World.” [Hebrew] Sidra 26 (2011): 81–115.Google Scholar
Katz, Menachem. “Ṣurato shel midrash halakha “o kelakh le-derekh zo.’” Mishlav 29 (1996): 33–43.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Traditions from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Invention and Method: Two Rhetorical Treatises from the Hermogenic Corpus. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2005.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Kensky, Meira. Trying Man, Trying God: The Divine Courtroom in Early Jewish and Christian Literature. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
Kessler, Amalia. “Our Inquisitorial Tradition: Equity Procedure, Due Process, and the Search for an Alternative to the Adversarial.” Cornell Law Review 90 (2005): 1181–275.Google Scholar
King, Matthew. “Security, Scale, Form, and Function: The Search for Truth and the Exclusion of Evidence in Adversarial and Inquisitorial Justice Systems.” International Legal Perspectives 12 (2002): 185–236.Google Scholar
Kinneavy, James. Greek Rhetorical Origins of Christian Faith. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Klingbeil, Gerald. Bridging the Gap: Ritual and Ritual Texts in the Bible. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2007.Google Scholar
Kohat, Hanah. “Ben ‘aristoqratyah le-demoqratyah – Rabban Gamaliel ve-Rabbi Yehoshua.” In Sefer yeshurun, edited by Shashar, Michael, 213–28. Jerusalem: Shashar Publishing, 1999.Google Scholar
Kohler, Kaufman. “Paraclete.” Jewish Encyclopedia (New York, NY: Funk and Wagnalls, 1906).Google Scholar
Kosovsky, Y.M. “Ha-meturgeman ba-derasha ha-ṣiburit (pirqa) be-bet ha-keneset.” Sinai 45 (1959): 233–43.Google Scholar
Kraemer, David. “Composition and Meaning in the Bavli.” Prooftexts 8, no. 3 (1988): 271–91.Google Scholar
Kraemer, David. Reading the Rabbis: The Talmud as Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kraemer, David. “Rhetoric of Failed Refutation in the Bavli.” Shofar 10, no. 2 (1992): 73–85.Google Scholar
Krauss, Samuel. Griechische und lateinische Lehnwoerter im Talmud, Midrasch und Targum. Berlin: S. Calvary, 1899.Google Scholar
Krauss, Samuel. “The Jews in the Works of the Church Fathers.” Jewish Quarterly Review o.s. 6 (1894): 82–99, 225–61.Google Scholar
Kubicek, Theodore. Adversarial Justice: America’s Court System on Trial. New York, NY: Algora Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Kugel, James. The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and Its History. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kunst, Arnold. “An Overlooked Type of Inference.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 10, no. 4 (1942): 976–91.Google Scholar
Labendz, Jenny. Socratic Torah: Non-Jews in Rabbinic Intellectual Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lapin, Hayim. Rabbis as Romans: The Rabbinic Movement in Palestine, 100–400 C.E. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Lenhard, Doris. Die Rabbinische Homilie. Ein formanalytischer Index. Frankfurt: Gesellschaft zur Förderung Judaistischer Studien, 1998.Google Scholar
Leon, Judah Messer. The Book of the Honeycomb’s Flow. Translated by Rabinowitz, Isaac. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jon. Creation and the Persistence of Evil: The Jewish Drama of Divine Omnipotence. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1988.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Beyond the Verse: Talmudic Readings and Lectures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Nine Talmudic Readings. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Levine, Lee. The Ancient Synagogue: The First Thousand Years. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Levine, Lee. Judaism and Hellenism in Antiquity: Conflict or Confluence? Peabody, MO: Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
Levine, Lee. The Rabbinic Class of Roman Palestine in Late Antiquity. Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Levine, Lee. “The Status of the Patriarch in the Third and Fourth Centuries: Sources and Methodology.” Journal of Jewish Studies 47, no. 1 (1996): 1–32.Google Scholar
Liddell, Henry George, and Scott, Robert. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul. Greek in Jewish Palestine. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary, 1942.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul. Hellenism in Jewish Palestine. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary, 1962.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul. “Roman Legal Institutions in Early Rabbinics and in the Acta Martyrum.” Jewish Quarterly Review 35, no. 1 (1944): 1–57.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul. The Talmud of Caesarea [Hebrew]. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary, 1968.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul. Tosefeth rishonim. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1999.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Saul. Tosefta ki-fshutah. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1955–88.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Stephen. “A Mesopotamian Background for the So-called Aggadic ‘Measures’ of Biblical Hermeneutics.” Hebrew Union College Annual 58 (1987): 157–225.Google Scholar
Liebersohn, Yosef. The Dispute Concerning Rhetoric in Hellenistic Thought. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010.Google Scholar
Lifshitz, David. “`Aliyato shel Hillel la-nesi’ut be-aspaqlariah satirit.” Moreshet Yisrael 5 (2008): 18–30.Google Scholar
Lightstone, Jack N. Mishnah and the Social Formation of the Early Rabbinic Guild: A Socio-Rhetorical Approach. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lightstone, Jack N. The Rhetoric of the Babylonian Talmud, Its Social Meaning and Context. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Liss, Abraham. The Babylonian Talmud with Variant Readings [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Yad Harav Herzog, 1983.Google Scholar
Litsas, Fotios. “Choricius of Gaza: An Approach to His Work.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1980.Google Scholar
Lorberbaum, Yair. “The Rainbow in the Cloud: An Anger-Management Device.” The Journal of Religion 89, no. 4 (2009): 498–540.Google Scholar
Luft, Sandra Rudnick. Vico’s Uncanny Humanism: Reading the New Science Between Modern and Postmodern. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas. The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Mandel, Paul. “`Al ‘pataḥ’ ve`al ha-petiḥah: `iyun ḥadash.” In Higayon le-Yonah, 49–82. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mandel, Paul. “Midrashic Exegesis and Its Precedents in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Dead Sea Discoveries 8, no. 2 (2001): 149–68.Google Scholar
Mann, Jacob. The Bible as Read and Preached in the Old Synagogue. Cincinnati, OH: Mann-Sonne Publication Committee, 1940–1966; New York, NY: Ktav, 1970.Google Scholar
Marback, Richard. Plato’s Dream of Sophistry. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Margulius, Mordechai, ed. Midrash Vayikra Rabbah. Jerusalem: Bet Midrash Le-Rabbanim Be-Amerika, 1993.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. I. A History of Education in Antiquity. Translated by Lamb, George. University of Wisconsin Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Martin, F. “Homélie de Narsès sur les trois docteurs Nestoriens.” Journal Asiatique, ix, 14–15 (1899): 446–92 and 69–525.Google Scholar
Mason, Steve, ed. Flavius Josephus: Translation and Commentary, Volume 9: Life of Josephus. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Mattingly, David. Imperialism, Power, and Identity: Experiencing the Roman Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
May, James. Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Maybaum, Siegmund. Die ältesten Phasen in der Entwicklung der jüdischen Predigt. Berlin, 1901.Google Scholar
McAdon, Brad. “Rhetoric Is a Counterpart of Dialectic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34, no. 2: 113–50.Google Scholar
McComiskey, Bruce. Gorgias and the New Sophistic Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
McComiskey, Bruce. “Neo-Sophistic Rhetorical Theory: Sophistic Precedents for Contemporary Epistemic Rhetoric.” Rhetorical Society Quarterly 24, no. 3/4 (1994): 16–24.Google Scholar
McVey, Kathleen. “The Mēmrā on the Three Nestorian Doctors as an Example of Forensic Rhetoric.” In III Symposium Syriacum, edited by Lavenant, R.. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Orientalium Studiorum, 1983.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne, and Wilken, Robert. Jews and Christians in Antioch in the First Four Centuries of the Common Era. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Menander, . Menander Rhetor. Translated by Russel, D. A. and Wilson, N. G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. “The Trouble with the Adversary System in a Postmodern, Multicultural World.” William and Mary Law Review 38, no. 1 (1996): 5–44.Google Scholar
Metzger, David, and Katz, Steven. “The ‘Place’ of Rhetoric in Aggadic Midrash.” College English 72, no. 6 (2010): 638–53.Google Scholar
Mielziner, M. “The Talmudic Syllogism or the Inference of Kal Vechomer.” Hebrew Review 1 (1880): 42–53.Google Scholar
Milgram, Jonathan. From Mesopotamia to the Mishnah: Tannaitic Inheritance Law in its Legal and Social Contexts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob. “The Qumran Cult: Its Exegetical Principles.” In Temple Scroll Studies, edited by Brooke, George, 165–80. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Miller, Stuart. Sages and Commoners in Late Antique Eretz Israel. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar
Milovanovic-Barham, Celica. “Three Levels of Style in Augustine of Hippo and Gregory of Nazianzus.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 11, no. 1 (1993): 1–25.Google Scholar
Moore, George Foot. Judaism in the First Centuries of the Christian Era, the Age of the Tannaim. 1927. New York, NY: Schocken Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Moore, Mark. “Seeking Knowledge from the ‘Container and Thing Contained’.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 18, no. 1 (1988): 15–30.Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Morris, Nathan. The Jewish School: An Introduction to the History of Jewish Education. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1937.Google Scholar
Morrow, Glenn. Plato’s Cretan City: A Historical Interpretation of the Laws. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Moscovitz, Leib. “The Formation and Character of the Jerusalem Talmud.” In The Cambridge History of Judaism IV, edited by Katz, S., 663–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Moscovitz, Leib. Talmudic Reasoning: From Casuistics to Conceptualization. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.Google Scholar
Moss, Yonatan. “Noblest Obelus: Rabbinic Appropriations of Late Ancient Literary Criticism.” In Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters, edited by Niehoff, Maren, 245–67. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Muffs, Yochanan. Love and Joy: Law, Language and Religion in Ancient Israel. New York, NY: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1992.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert. “Some Rhetorical Patterns in Early Syriac Literature.” In A Tribute to Arthur Vööbus: Studies in Early Christian Literature and Its Environment, Primarily in the Syrian East, edited by Fischer, Robert, 109–31. Chicago, IL: The Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, 1977.Google Scholar
Murtonen, A., ed. Hebrew in Its West Semitic Setting, Part I: A Comparative Lexicon. Leiden: Brill, 1986.Google Scholar
Naeh, Shlomo. “On Structures of Memory and the Forms of Text in Rabbinic Literature.” [Hebrew] Meḥqere Talmud 3, no. 2 (2005): 543–89.Google Scholar
Nagorcka, Felicity, Stanton, Michael, and Wilson, Michael. “Stranded Between Partisanship and the Truth? A Comparative Analysis of Legal Ethics in the Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems of Justice.” Melbourne University Law Review 29 (2005): 448–77.Google Scholar
Nanos, Mark, ed. The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002.Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob. “From Biography to Theology: Gamaliel and the Patriarchate.” Review of Rabbinic Judaism 7 (2004): 52–94.Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob. From Politics to Piety: The Emergence of Pharisaic Judaism. New York, NY: Ktav, 1979.Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob. Jerusalem and Athens: The Congruity of Talmudic and Classical Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob. Sifre to Numbers: An American Translation and Explanation. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob. Uniting the Dual Torah: Sifra and Problem of the Mishnah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren. Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “On Truth and Lying in an Extra-Moral Sense (1873).” In Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language, edited by Gilman, S. L., Blair, C. and Parent, D. J., 246–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Noam, Vered. “Beth Shammai veha-halakha ha-kitatit.” Mada`e ha-Yahadut 41 (2002): 45–67.Google Scholar
Novick, Tzvi. “The Borer Court: New Interpretations of mSan 3.” Zutot 5, no. 1 (2008): 1–8.Google Scholar
Novick, Tzvi Rabbinic Poetry: Late Antique Jewish Liturgical Poetry and Rabbinic Midrash (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Novick, Tzvi. “Scripture as Rhetor: A Study in Early Rabbinic Midrash.” Hebrew Union College Annual 82–83 (2011–12): 37–59.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. “The Agonistic Base of Scientifically Abstract Thought: Issues in Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness.” In An Ong Reader: Challenges for Further Inquiry, edited by Farrell, Thomas and Soukup, Paul. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. London: Routledge, 1982.Google Scholar
Ostrow, Jonah. “Tannaitic and Roman Procedure in Homicide.” Jewish Quarterly Review 52, no. 2 (1961): 160–7.Google Scholar
Ouaknin, Marc-Alain. The Burnt Book: Reading the Talmud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Palmer, Georgiana. “The Topoi of Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric’ as Exemplified in the Orators.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1932.Google Scholar
Panken, Aaron. The Rhetoric of Innovation: Self-conscious Legal Change in Rabbinic Literature. Lanham: University Press of America, 2005.Google Scholar
Parks, E. P. The Roman Rhetorical Schools as a Preparation for the Courts under the Early Empire. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University, 1945.Google Scholar
Parush, Adi. “The Courtroom as Theater and the Theater as Courtroom in Ancient Athens.” Israel Law Review 35 (2001): 118–37.Google Scholar
Paz, Yakir. “From Scribes to Scholars: Rabbinic Biblical Exegesis in Light of the Homeric Commentaries.” PhD diss., 2014.Google Scholar
Penella, Robert, ed. Rhetorical Exercises from Late Antiquity: A Translation of Choricius of Gaza’s Preliminary Talks and Declamations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim. The Realm of Rhetoric. Translated by Kluback, William. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Phenix, Robert. The Sermons on Joseph of Balai of Qenneshrin: Rhetoric and Interpretation in Fifth Century Syriac Literature. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar
Phillips, Gerald. “The Place of Rhetoric in the Babylonian Talmud.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 43, no. 4 (1957): 390–3.Google Scholar
Phillips, Gerald. “The Practice of Rhetoric at the Talmudic Academies.” Speech Monographs (1959): 37–46.Google Scholar
Philo, . The Works of Philo: Complete and Unabridged. Translated by Yonge, C. D.. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2008.Google Scholar
Pitts, Andrew. “Hellenistic Schools in Jerusalem and Paul’s Rhetorical Education.” In Paul’s World, edited by Porter, Stanley, 19–50. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Pizzi, William. “Sentencing in the US: An Inquisitorial Soul in an Adversarial Body?.” In Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaška, edited by Jackson, John, Langer, Maximo and Tillers, Peter, 65–79. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
Plato, . Theaetetus and Sophist. Translated by Fowler, H. N.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Polybius, . The Histories. Translated by Paton, W. R.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley, ed. Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C. - A.D. 400. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Porton, Gary. “Midrash and the Rabbinic Sermon.” In When Judaism and Christianity Began: Essays in Memory of Anthony J. Saldarini, edited by Avery-Peck, Alan, Harrington, Daniel and Neusner, Jacob, 2.461–82. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Potter, David. “Performance, Power, and Justice in the High Empire.” In Roman Theater and Society: E. Togo Salmon Conference Papers I, edited by Slater, William, 129–60. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Powell, Jonathan, and Paterson, Jeremy. Cicero the Advocate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Purcell, William M. Ars Poetriae: Rhetorical and Grammatical Invention at the Margin of Literacy. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, 1996.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . Institutes of Oratory: or, Education of an Orator in Twelve Books. Translated by Watson, John Selby. London: George Bell & Sons, 1892.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . The Lesser Declamations. Translated by Bailey, D. R. Shackleton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . The Major Declamations Ascribed to Quintilian. Translated by Sussman, Lewis. New York, NY: Verlag Peter Lang, 1987.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . The Minor Declamations Ascribed to Quintilian. Edited by Winterbottom, Michael. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 1984.Google Scholar
Rabinovits, Hosea. “Ḥamesh derashotav shel ha-hu Gelila’a.” Hagige Giv`ah 3 (1995): 53–64.Google Scholar
Rappel, Dov. “Ḥokhmat Yevanit – retorica?” [Hebrew] Meḥqere Yerushalaim bi-Maḥshevet Yisrael 2, no. 3 (1983): 317–22.Google Scholar
Ravitsky, Aviram. “Aristotelian Logic and Talmudic Methodology: The Commentaries on the 13 Hermeneutic Principles and their Application of Logic.” In Judaic Logic, edited by Schumann, Andrew, 117–43. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Reader, William. The Severed Hand and the Upright Corpse: The Declamations of Marcus Antonius Polemo. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Regev, Eyal. The Sadducees and their Halakhah: Religion and Society in the Second Temple Period [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Reggio, Isaac Samuel. Ha-Torah ve-ha-filosofia: ḥoverot ‘isha ‘el ‘aḥota. Vienna, 1827.Google Scholar
Revel, Bernard. The Karaite Halakah and Its Relation to Sadducean, Samaritan and Philonian Halakah. Philadelphia, PA: Ktav, 1913.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Anthony. “The Linguistic Return: Deconstruction as Textual Messianism.” SubStance 43, no. 1 (2014): 152–65.Google Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew. Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent. “Wrongful Convictions: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Themes.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 35 (2010): 387–446.Google Scholar
Robardet, Patrick. “Should We Abandon the Adversarial Model in Favour of the Inquisitorial Model in Commissions of Inquiry?” Dalhousie Law Journal 12, no. 3 (1989–1990): 111–32.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. Rhys. “Caecilius of Calacte.” American Journal of Philology 18, no. 3 (1897): 302–12.Google Scholar
Robinson, Thomas. Contrasting Arguments: An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi. Salem, NH: Ayer, 1979.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Jason. “The Compositional Art of the She’iltot of R. Aḥa: Creating a Babylonian Homiletic Midrash.” PhD diss., Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 2010.Google Scholar
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. “Midrash and Hermeneutic Reflectivity: Kishmu`o as a Test Case.” In Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters, edited by Niehoff, Maren, 329–44. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. “The Rise and Fall of Rabbinic Masculinity.” Jewish Studies, an Internet Journal 12 (2013): 1–22.Google Scholar
Rosental, David. “Mesorot Ereṣ-Yisraeliyot ve-darkan le-Bavel.” Cathedra 92 (1999): 7–48.Google Scholar
Rosental, David. “The Torah Reading in the Annual Cycle in the Land of Israel.” [Hebrew] Tarbiz 53, no. 1 (1983): 144–8.Google Scholar
Rosental, Eliezer Shimshon. “Shnei devarim.” In Sefer Yitshak Aryeh Zeligman: ma’amarim ba-Mikra uva-`olam ha-`atiq, edited by Zakovits, Yair and Rofe, Alexander, 463–81. Jerusalem: E. Rubenstein, 1983.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Clare. Luke-Acts and the Rhetoric of History: An Investigation of Early Christian Historiography. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar
Rovner, Jay. “An Early Passover Haggadah According to the Palestinian Rite.” Jewish Quarterly Review 90, no. 3/4 (2000): 337–96.Google Scholar
Rovner, Jay. “Rhetorical Strategy and Dialectical Necessity in the Babylonian Talmud: The Case of Kiddushin 34a–35a.” Hebrew Union College Annual 65 (1994): 177–231.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Jeffrey. The Culture of the Babylonian Talmud. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Jeffrey. “Nominalism and Realism in Qumranic and Rabbinic Law: A Reassessment.” Dead Sea Discoveries 6, no. 2 (1999): 157–83.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Jeffrey. “The Rise of the Babylonian Rabbinic Academy: A Reexamination of the Talmudic Evidence.” Jewish Studies, an Internet Journal 1 (2002): 56–68.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Jeffrey. “Social and Institutional Settings of Rabbinic Literature.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature, edited by Fonrobert, Charlotte and Jaffee, Martin, 58–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Jeffrey. “Some Structural Patterns of Yerushalmi Sugyot.” In The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman Culture III, edited by Schäfer, Peter, 303–13. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Jeffrey. Stories of the Babylonian Talmud. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Jeffrey. Talmudic Stories: Narrative Art, Composition, and Culture. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rubinelli, Sara. Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Lene. Litigation and Co-operation: Supporting Speakers in the Courts of Classical Athens. Stuttgart: Franza Steiner Verlag Stuttgart, 2000.Google Scholar
Russel, Donald A. Imaginary Speeches: A Selection of Declamations. London: Gerald Duckworth, 1996.Google Scholar
Saddington, Denis. “A Note on the Rhetoric of Four Speeches in Josephus.” Journal of Jewish Studies 58, no. 2 (2007): 228–35.Google Scholar
Safrai, Shmuel. “Education and the Study of Torah.” In The Jewish People in the First Century: Historical Geography, Political History, Social, Cultural and Religious Life and Institutions, edited by Safrai, S. and Stern, M., 945–70. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, 1976.Google Scholar
Safrai, Shmuel, ed. The Literature of the Sages, Part One. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Safrai, Shmuel, and Safrai, Ze’ev. Mishnat Eretz Israel. Jerusalem: E.M. Liphshitz College Publishing House, 2008.Google Scholar
Saldarini, Anthony J. Pharisees, Scribes and Sadducees in Palestinian Society: A Sociological Approach. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1988.Google Scholar
Sarason, Richard. “The Petiḥot in Leviticus Rabba: Oral Homilies or Redactional Constructions.” Journal of Jewish Studies 33 (1982): 557–67.Google Scholar
Sarton, George. Hellenistic Science and Culture in the Last Three Centuries B.C. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Satlow, Michael. “Beyond Influence: Toward a New Historiographic Paradigm.” In Jewish Literatures and Cultures: Context and Intertext, edited by Norich, Anita and Eliav, Yaron, 37–53. Providence: Brown Judaic Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
Satlow, Michael. “Rhetoric and Assumptions: Romans and Rabbis on Sex.” In Jews in a Graeco-Roman World, edited by Goodman, Martin, 135–44. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Saunders, Trevor. “Plato’s Later Political Thought.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, edited by Kraut, R., 464–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Saunders, Trevor. Plato’s Penal Code: Tradition, Controversy, and Reform in Greek Penology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Baskin, Wade. New York, NY: The Philosophical Library, 1959.Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip, ed. St. Augustin’s City of God and Christian Doctrine, Volume 2 of A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1907.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Ryan. Rethinking Paul’s Rhetorical Education: Comparative Rhetoric and 2 Corinthians 10–13. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2013.Google Scholar
Schiappa, Edward. The Beginnings of Rhetorical Theory in Classical Greece. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Schiappa, Edward. “Dissoi Logoi.” In Classical Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources, edited by Ballif, Michelle and Moran, Michael, 146–8. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brent. Utopian Communities of the Ancient World: Idealistic Experiments of Pythagoras, the Essenes, Pachomius, and Proclus. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz. Principles of Roman Law. Translated by Wolff, Marguerite. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Schwabe, Moshe. “The Letters of Libanius to the Patriarch of Palestine.” [Hebrew] Tarbiz 1, no. 2 (1930): 85–110.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Daniel. “Law and Truth: On Qumran-Sadducean and Rabbinic Views of Law.” In Dead Sea Scrolls: Forty Years of Research, edited by Dimant, Deborah and Rappaport, Uriel, 229–40. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Daniel. “Ti`une ‘qal va-ḥomer’ ke-realism Ṣaddoqi.” Masechet 5 (2006): 145–56.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Seth. “Gamaliel in Aphrodite’s Bath: Palestinian Society and Jewish Identity in the High Roman Empire.” In Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 335–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Seth. Imperialism and Jewish Society, 200 B.C.E. to 640 C.E. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Seth. “The Patriarchs and the Diaspora.” Journal of Jewish Studies 51, no. 2 (2000): 208–318.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Adolf. Der Hermeneutische Syllogismus in der Talmudischen Litteratur, Ein Beitrag Zur Geschichte Der Logik Im Morgenlande. Karlsruhe: G. Braun, 1901.Google Scholar
Schwarzbaum, Haim. “Talmudic-Midrashic Affinities of Some Aesopic Fables.” In Essays in Greco-Roman and Related Talmudic Literature, edited by Fischel, Henry, 443–72. New York, NY: Ktav, 1977.Google Scholar
Segal, Eliezer. “Jewish Perspectives on Restorative Justice.” In The Spiritual Roots of Restorative Justice, edited by Hadley, Michael, 181–97. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Seneca, Marcus Annaeus. Declamations. Translated by Winterbottom, M.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Shafat, Shoval. “The Interface of Divine and Human Punishment in Rabbinic Thought.” [Hebrew] PhD diss., Ben-Gurion University, 2011.Google Scholar
Shalom, Abraham. Haqdamat ha-ma`atiq ha-she’elot veha-teshubot `al mabo ma’amarot u-meliṣah lehe-ḥakham Marsiliyyo. Vienna: Friedrich Förster, 1859.Google Scholar
Shamah, Moshe. Recalling the Covenant: A Contemporary Commentary on the Five Books of the Torah. Jersey City: Ktav, 2011.Google Scholar
Shapira, Haim. “Beit ha-Midrash (the House of Study) during the Late Second Temple Period and the Age of the Mishnah: Institutional and Ideological Aspects.” [Hebrew] PhD diss., Hebrew University, 2001.Google Scholar
Sharvit, Shimon. Masechet Avot le-doroteha: mahadura mada`it, mevo’ot ve-nispaḥim. Jerusalem: Mosad Bialik, 2004.Google Scholar
Siegert, Folker. “The Sermon as an Invention of Hellenistic Judaism.” In Preaching in Judaism and Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity, edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter and Schottler, Heinz-Gunther, 25–44. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Simon-Shoshan, Moshe. “Halakhic Mimesis: Rhetorical and Redactional Strategies in Tannaitic Narrative.” Diné Israel 24 (2007): 101–23.Google Scholar
Simon-Shoshan, Moshe. “The Talmud as Novel: A Bakhtinian Approach to the Bavli, or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Stam.” Paper presented at the Association for Jewish Studies Conference, Chicago, 2012.Google Scholar
Sinai, Yuval. “‘Do Not Make Yourself as Advocates’: On the Place of a Rule in Court Procedure.” [Hebrew]. In Studies in Jewish Law: Judge and Judging, edited by Habba, Ya`akov and Radzyner, Amihai, 93–128. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University, 2007.Google Scholar
Sinai, Yuval. The Judge and the Judicial Process in Jewish Law [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Hebrew University, 2010.Google Scholar
Siniossoglou, Niketas. Plato and Theodoret: The Christian Appropriation of Platonic Philosophy and the Hellenic Intellectual Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Sion, Avi. Judaic Logic: A Formal Analysis of Biblical, Talmudic and Rabbinic Logic. Geneva: Editions Slatkine, 1997.Google Scholar
Siverstev, Alexei. Households, Sects, and the Origins of Rabbinic Judaism. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Sloane, Thomas. On the Contrary: The Protocol of Traditional Rhetoric. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Michael. A Dictionary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic of the Byzantine Period. Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University, 1992.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “Cicero’s First Speeches: A Rhetorical Analysis.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69 (1938): 542–56.Google Scholar
Spengel, Leonard. ΣΥΝΑΊΟΊΗ ΤΕΧΝΩΝ sive Artium Scriptores ab initiis usque ad editors Aristotelis de Rhetorica libros. Stuttgart, 1828.Google Scholar
Sperber, Daniel. A Dictionary of Greek and Latin Terms in Rabbinic Literature. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Sperber, Daniel. Greek in Talmudic Palestine. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Boaz. “Madua` ni`nea` mal’akh ha-mavet et ha-’ilanot bi-ftirat David ha-melekh.” Shma`tin 150 (2003): 286–311.Google Scholar
Stein, Edmund. “Die homiletische Peroration im Midrasch.” Hebrew Union College Annual 8–9 (1931–32): 353–71.Google Scholar
Stein, M. “Le-ḥeqer midreshe yelamdenu.” In Sefer ha-yovel li-khevod Professor Moshe Shor, 85–112. Warsaw: Ha-ḥevrah le-hafaṣat mada`e ha-Yahadut be-Polania, 1935.Google Scholar
Stein, Siegfried. “The Influence of Symposia Literature on the Literary Form of the Pesaḥ Haggadah.” Journal of Jewish Studies 8 (1957): 13–44.Google Scholar
Steiner, Richard. “On the Original Structure and Meaning of Mah Nishtannah and the History of Its Reinterpretation.” Jewish Studies, an Internet Journal 7 (2008): 163–204.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, Zvi Aryeh. “`Asinu `aṣmenu ke-`orkhe ha-dayanin.” Te`udah 7 (1991): 111–32.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Devora. Punishment and Freedom: The Rabbinic Construction of Criminal Law. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 2008.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Günter. “The Derashah in Rabbinic Times.” In Preaching in Judaism and Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity, edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter and Schottler, Heinz-Gunther, 7–21. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Stern, David. “Literary Criticism or Literary Homilies? Susan Handelman and the Contemporary Study of Midrash.” Prooftexts 5 (1985): 96–103.Google Scholar
Stern, David. “Midrash and Hermeneutics: Polysemy vs. Indeterminacy.” In Midrash and Theory: Ancient Jewish Exegesis and Contemporary Literary Studies, 15–38. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Stern, David. Midrash and Theory: Ancient Jewish Exegesis and Contemporary Literary Studies. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Stern, David. “Moses-cide: Midrash and Contemporary Literary Criticism.” Prooftexts 4 (1985): 193–213.Google Scholar
Stern, David. Parables in Midrash: Narrative and Exegesis in Rabbinic Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Stern, Menachem. Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1980.Google Scholar
Stern, Sacha. Calendar and Community: A History of the Jewish Calendar, Second Century BCE–Tenth Century CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Stone, Suzanne Last. “On the Interplay of Rules, ‘Cases,’ and Concepts in Rabbinic Legal Literature: Another Look at the Aggadot on Honi the Circle-Drawer.” Diné Israel 24 (2007): 125–55.Google Scholar
Stone, Suzanne Last. “Rabbinic Legal Magic: A New Look at Honi’s Circle as the Construction of Legal Space.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 17 (2005): 97–123.Google Scholar
Strack, H. L., and Stemberger, G.. Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash. Translated by Bockmuehl, Marcus. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sussmann, Yaakov. “The History of Halakha and the Dead Sea Scrolls: Preliminary Observations on Miqsat Ma`ase Ha-Torah (4QMMT).” [Hebrew] Tarbiz 59 (1990): 11–76.Google Scholar
Sussmann, Yaakov. Thesaurus of Talmudic Manuscripts [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi, 2012.Google Scholar
Swartz, Michael. “Scholasticism as a Comparative Category and the Study of Judaism.” In Scholasticism: Cross-Cultural and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Cabezón, José Ignacio, 91–114. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Tabory, Joseph. JPS Commentary on the Haggadah: Historical Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society, 2008.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, Olga. “Roman Law and Rhetoric.” Revue Belge De Philologie Et D’histoire 84, no. 1 (2006): 59–75.Google Scholar
Tempest, Kathryn. Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome. New York, NY: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Theodor, Judah. “Zur Komposition der agadischen Homilien.” Monatschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judenthums 29 (1881): 500–10.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony C. “Truth.” In The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, edited by Colin, Brown, 3:874–902. Exeter: Paternoster Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Towner, W. Sibley. “Hermeneutical Systems of Hillel and the Tannaim: A Fresh Look.” Hebrew Union College Annual 53 (1983): 101–35.Google Scholar
Tropper, Amram. Wisdom, Politics, and Historiography: Tractate Avot in the Context of the Graeco-Roman Near East. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Tur-Sinai, Naphtali. The Book of Job: A New Commentary. Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer, 1957.Google Scholar
Ulmer, Rivka. “The Advancement of Arguments in Exegetical Midrash Compared to that of the Greek ‘δΐατρίβε’.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 28, no. 1 (1997): 48–91.Google Scholar
Ulmer, Rivka. ed. Pesiqta Rabbati: A Synoptic Edition of Pesiqta Rabbati based upon All Extant Manuscripts and the Editio Princeps. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Urbach, Ephraim. The Sages: Their Concepts and Beliefs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
van Koppen, Peter, and Penrod, Steven. “Adversarial or Inquisitorial: Comparing Systems.” In Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Justice, edited by van Koppen, Peter and Penrod, Steven, 1–19. New York, NY: Plenum Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. The New Science. Translated by Bergin, Thomas G. and Fisch, Max H.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Vidas, Moulie. “Greek Wisdom in Babylonia.” In Envisioning Judaism: Studies in Honor of Peter Schäfer on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, edited by Boustan, Ra`anan et al., 287–305. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Vidas, Moulie. Tradition and the Formation of the Talmud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Visotzky, Burton. Golden Bells and Pomegranates: Studies in Midrash Leviticus Rabbah. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar
Visotzky, Burton. “Midrash, Christian Exegesis, and Hellenistic Hermeneutics.” In Current Trends in the Study of Midrash, edited by Bakhos, Carol, 111–31. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Visotzky, Burton. “The Misnomers ‘Petihah’ and ‘Homiletic Midrash’ as Descriptions for Leviticus Rabbah and Pesikta De-Rav Kahana.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 18 (2011): 19–31.Google Scholar
Wacholder, Ben-Zion. “Sippure Rabban Gamaliel ba-Mishna uba-Tosefta.” World Congress for Jewish Studies 4, no. 1 (1967): 143–4.Google Scholar
Walker, Joel T. “The Limits of Late Antiquity: Philosophy between Rome and Iran.” Ancient World 33, no. 1 (2002): 45–69.Google Scholar
Walpin, Gerald. “America’s Adversarial and Jury Systems: More Likely to Do Justice.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 26 (2003): 175–86.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, and Macagno, Fabrizio. “Enthymemes, Argumentation Schemes and Topics.” Logique and Analyse 205 (2009): 39–56.Google Scholar
Wardy, Robert. The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and their Successors. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Wasserstein, A. “Greek Language and Philosophy in the Early Rabbinic Academies.” In Jewish Education and Learning, edited by Abramson, G. and Parfitt, T., 221–32. Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Watson, Duane. “The New Testament and Greco-Roman Rhetoric: A Bibliography.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 31, no. 4 (1988): 465–72.Google Scholar
Watson, Duane, and Hauser, Alan. Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Watt, John. “Eastward and Westward Transmission of Classical Rhetoric.” In Centers of Learning: Learning and Location in Pre-Modern Europe and the Near East, edited by Drijvers, J. W. and MacDonald, A. A., 63–75. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Weder, Hans. “Deus Incarnatus: On the Hermeneutics of Christology in the Johannine Writings.” In Exploring the Gospel of John: In Honor of D. Moody Smith, edited by Culpepper, R. A. and Black, C. C., 327–45. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Weingend, Thomas. “Should We Search for the Truth, and Who Should Do It?” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 36 (2011): 389–415.Google Scholar
Weinreb, Ernest. “Law as Myth: Reflections on Plato’s Gorgias.” Iowa Law Review 74 (1989): 787–806.Google Scholar
Weisenberg, E. “Observations on Method in Talmudic Studies.” Journal of Semitic Studies 11, no. 1 (1966): 16–36.Google Scholar
Weiss, Dov. “Divine Concessions in the Tanhuma Midrashim.” Harvard Theological Review 108, no. 1 (2015): 70–97.Google Scholar
Weiss, Dov. “Lawsuits against God in Rabbinic Literature.” In The Divine Courtroom in Comparative Perspective, edited by Mermelstein, Ari and Holtz, Shalom, 276–88. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Weiss, Harold. “The Sabbath among the Samaritans.” Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 25, no. 2 (1994): 252–73.Google Scholar
Weiss, Moshe. “Ha-’otentiut shel ha-shaqla ve-ṭaria be-maḥloqot bet Shamai u-vet Hillel.” Sidra 4 (1988): 53–66.Google Scholar
Weiss, Moshe. “Ha-gezerah shavah veha-qal va-ḥomer ba-shaqla ve-taria shel bet Shammai u-vet Hillel.” Sidra 6 (1990): 41–61.Google Scholar
Weiss, Zeev. “Theaters, Hippodromes, Amphitheatres, and Performances.” In The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Daily Life in Roman Palestine, edited by Hezser, Catherine, 623–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. Heracles’ Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, 1985.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Timothy. “‘Greece is the World’: Exile and Identity in the Second Sophistic.” In Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 269–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John. An Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: S. Gellibrand, 1668.Google Scholar
Williamson, Ronald. Jews in the Hellenistic World: Philo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Wills, Lawrence. “The Form of the Sermon in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity.” Harvard Theological Review 77 (1984): 277–99.Google Scholar
Wimpfheimer, Barry. Narrating the Law: A Poetics of Talmudic Legal Stories. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 2011.Google Scholar
Winston, David. Logos and Mystical Theology in Philo of Alexandria. Cincinnati, OH: Hebrew Union College Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Allen Conan. “A Contemporary Examination of the A Fortiori Argument Involving Jewish Traditions.” PhD diss., University of Waterloo, 2010.Google Scholar
Yadin-Israel, Azzan. “Rabbinic Polysemy: A Response to Steven Fraade.” AJS Review 38 (2014): 129–41.Google Scholar
Yadin, Azzan. “The Chain Novel and the Problem of Self-undermining Interpretation.” Diné Israel 25 (2008): 43–71.Google Scholar
Yadin, Azzan. “Rabban Gamliel, Aphrodite’s Bath, and the Question of Pagan Monotheism.” Jewish Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (2006): 149–79.Google Scholar
Yadin, Azzan. Scripture and Tradition: Rabbi Akiva and the Triumph of Midrash. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 2015.Google Scholar
Yadin, Azzan. Scripture as Logos: Rabbi Ishmael and the Origins of Midrash. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 2004.Google Scholar
Yassif, Eli. The Hebrew Folktale: History, Genre, Meaning. Translated by Teitelbaum, Jacqueline. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Yelin, Hanoch. “Le-shitat ha-niqud shel ha-Mishnah” in Albeck, Hanoch, Six Orders of Mishnah, 6 vols. Jerusalem: Mossad Bialik, 1959.Google Scholar
Yeo, Khiok-Khng. Rhetorical Interaction in 1 Corinthians 8 and 10: A Formal Analysis with Preliminary Suggestions for a Chinese, Cross-Cultural Hermeneutic. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Young, Suzanne. “An Athenian Clepsydra.” Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 8, no. 3 (1939): 274–84.Google Scholar
Yuval, Israel. “Christianity in Talmud and Midrash: Parallelomania or Parallelophobia.” In Transforming Relations: Essays on Jews and Christians throughout History in Honor of Michael A. Signer, edited by Harkins, Franklin, 50–74. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Yuval, Israel. “Easter and Passover as Early Jewish Christian Dialogue.” In Passover and Easter: Origin and History to Modern Times, edited by Bradshaw, Paul F. and Hoffman, Lawrence A., 89–124. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Solomon. “Hillel and the Hermeneutic Rules.” The Jewish Quarterly Review 54, no. 2 (1963): 161–73.Google Scholar