Attali, Y. (2004). Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V. 2. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(3).Google Scholar

Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69–93.Google Scholar

Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 855–860.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 92(1), 81–90.Google Scholar

Burrows, S., & Shortis, M. (2011). An evaluation of semi-automated, collaborative marking and feedback systems: Academic staff perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1135–1154.Google Scholar

Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., Chodorow, M., Braden-Harder, L., & Harris, M. D. (1998, August). Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1 (pp. 206–210). Montreal: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Cann, A. (2014). Engaging students with audio feedback. Bioscience Education, 22(1), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., & Tetreault, J. (2010). The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment. Language Testing, 27(3), 419–436.Google Scholar

Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107–155.Google Scholar

Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., de Gispert, I., & Barriga, F. D. (2013). Distribution of feedback among teacher and students in online collaborative learning in small groups. Digital Education Review, 23, 27–45.Google Scholar

Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., … & Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers & Education, 58(1), 386–396.Google Scholar

Deneen, C. C., Brown, G. T. L., & Carless, D. (2017). Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–10. Online prepublication, retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752.Google Scholar

Deneen, C. C., & Shroff, R. (2014). Understanding successes and difficulties in program-level eportfolios: A case study of two professional degree programs. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 7(24), 145–160.Google Scholar

Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 5(1).Google Scholar

Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1).Google Scholar

Gomez, S., Andersson, H., Park, J., Maw, S., Crook, A., & Orsmond, P. (2013). A digital ecosystems model of assessment feedback on student learning. Higher Education Studies, 3(2), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, C. J., Könings, K. D., Molyneux, A., Schuwirth, L. W., Wass, V., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2013). Web‐based feedback after summative assessment: How do students engage? Medical Education, 47(7), 734–744.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.Google Scholar

Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2014). Technology enhanced feedback on assessment. In Australian Computers in Education Conference, Adelaide, SA, September 30–October 3, 2014 (pp. 1–11). Retrieved from http://acec2014.acce.edu.au/session/technology- enhanced- feedback-assessment.Google Scholar

Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 51–66.Google Scholar

Hennessy, C., & Forrester, G. (2014). Developing a framework for effective audio feedback: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 777–789.Google Scholar

Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H. J., & Thorpe, L. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 117–127.Google Scholar

Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014). Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers & Education, 71, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, H. T. D., & Hung, S. T. A. (2013). Exploring the utility of a video‐based online EFL discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E90–E94.Google Scholar

Irwin, B., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Parkin, H. J., & Thorpe, L. (2013). Engaging students with feedback through adaptive release. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(1), 51–61.Google Scholar

Jackson, M., & Marks, L. (2016). Improving the effectiveness of feedback by use of assessed reflections and withholding of grades. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), 532–547.Google Scholar

Jordan, S. (2012). Student engagement with assessment and feedback: Some lessons from short-answer free-text e-assessment questions. Computers & Education, 58(2), 818–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, S. (2013). E-assessment: Past, present and future. New Directions, 9(1), 87–106.Google Scholar

Jordan, S., & Mitchell, T. (2009). e‐Assessment for learning? The potential of short answer free text questions with tailored feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 371–385.Google Scholar

Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students’ art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education, 85, 149–159.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008). Response to assessment feedback: The effects of grades, praise, and source of information. ETS Research Report Series, 2008(1).Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319.Google ScholarPubMed

Marriott, P., & Teoh, L. K. (2012). Using screencasts to enhance assessment feedback: Students’ perceptions and preferences. Accounting Education, 21(6), 583–598.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153–169.Google Scholar

Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education, 71, 56–76.Google Scholar

Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: Using multiple‐choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53–64.Google Scholar

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicol, D. J., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment in terms of the seven principles of good feedback practice. In Bryan, C. and Clegg, K. (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 64–77). London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Nino, M., & Evans, M. A. (2015). Fostering 21st-century skills in constructivist engineering classrooms with digital game-based learning. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 10(3), 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkin, H. J., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963–973.Google Scholar

Phillips, M., Henderson, M., & Ryan, T. (2016). Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. In Barker, S., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Colvin, C. (Eds.), Show me the learning: Proceedings ASCILITE 2016 Adelaide (pp. 512–522).Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.Google Scholar

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J., & Bursky, S. A. (2013). Introduction to automated essay evaluation. In Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J., & Bursky, S. A. (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shroff, R. H., & Deneen, C. C. (2011). Assessing online textual feedback to support student intrinsic motivation using a collaborative text-based dialogue system: A qualitative study. International Journal on E-Learning, 10(1), 87–104.Google Scholar

Shute, V., & Towle, B. (2003). Adaptive e-learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer Games and Instruction, 55(2), 503–524.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J., & Ke, F. (2012). Games, learning, and assessment. In Assessment in game-based learning (pp. 43–58). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Timmers, C. F., Braber-Van Den Broek, J., & Van Den Berg, S. M. (2013). Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Computers & Education, 60(1), 25–31.Google Scholar

Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567.Google Scholar

Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511.Google Scholar

Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 157–180.Google Scholar

West, J., & Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the assessment experience: Improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400–410.Google Scholar

Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2015). Effective feedback design using free technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 408–434.Google Scholar