Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T12:13:14.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 8 - Uteroplacental Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2018

Edited by
Raymond W. Redline ,
Theonia K. Boyd  and
Drucilla J. Roberts
Raymond W. Redline
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Theonia K. Boyd
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Drucilla J. Roberts
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Placental and Gestational Pathology , pp. 275 - 306
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Cresswell, JA, et al., Prevalence of placenta praevia by world region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2013. 18(6):712–24.Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. 126(3):654–68.Google Scholar
Johnston, T, Patterson-Brown, S, Placenta praevia, placenta praevia accreta and vasa praevia: diagnosis and management. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Green-Top Guideline, 2011. 27:1–26.Google Scholar
Walfisch, A, Sheiner, E, Placenta previa and immediate outcome of the term offspring. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016. 294(4):739–44.Google Scholar
Vahanian, SA, et al., Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 213(4 Suppl):S78–90.Google Scholar
Lal, AK, Hibbard, JU, Placenta previa: an outcome-based cohort study in a contemporary obstetric population. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015. 292(2):299–305.Google Scholar
Poole, A, Haas, D, Magann, EF, Early abdominal ectopic pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2012. 74(4):249–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnhart, KT, Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. The New England journal of medicine, 2009. 361(4):379–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taran, F-AA, et al., The Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy. Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2015. 112(41):693.Google Scholar
Marion, LL, Meeks, GR, Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. 55(2):376–86.Google Scholar
Bouyer, J, et al., Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2002. 17(12):3224–30.Google Scholar
Hosni, MM, Herath, RP, Mumtaz, R, Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 2014. 69(5):261–76.Google Scholar
Parker, VL, Srinivas, M, Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016. 294(1):19–27.Google Scholar
Alammari, R, Thibodeau, R, Harmanli, O, Vaginal Hysterectomy for Treatment of Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. 129(1):63–5.Google Scholar
Shekhar, S, Singh, K, Chander, B, When Does an Ovarian Pregnancy Rupture? Case Report of an Unusual Early Rupture of a Primary Ovarian Pregnancy and Review of the Literature. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 2013. 29(5):245–7.Google Scholar
Joseph, RJ, Irvine, LM, Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: aetiology, diagnosis, and challenges in surgical management. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2012. 32(5):472–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallatt, JG, Primary ovarian pregnancy: a report of twenty-five cases. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982. 143(1):55–60.Google Scholar
Agarwal, N, Odejinmi, F, Early abdominal ectopic pregnancy: challenges, update and review of current management. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 2014. 16(3):193–8.Google Scholar
Panelli, DM, Phillips, CH, Brady, PC, Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review. Fertility Research and Practice, 2015. 1(1):1–20.Google Scholar
Beddock, R, et al., [Diagnosis and current concepts of management of advanced abdominal pregnancy]. Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite, 2004. 32(1):55–61.Google Scholar
Poole, A, Haas, D, Magann, EF, Early abdominal ectopic pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2012. 74(4):249–60.Google Scholar
Arleo, EK, DeFilippis, EM, Cornual, interstitial, and angular pregnancies: clarifying the terms and a review of the literature. Clinical imaging, 2014. 38(6):763–70.Google Scholar
Shaw, JL, et al., Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy. Human reproduction update, 2010. 16(4):432–44.Google Scholar
Andrade, A, et al., Ovarian ectopic pregnancy in adolescence. Clinical Case Reports, 2015. 3(11):912–15.Google Scholar
Begum, J, Pallavee, P, Samal, S, Diagnostic dilemma in ovarian pregnancy: a case series. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. 9(4):3.Google Scholar
Panda, S, et al., Case report of a primary ovarian pregnancy in a primigravida. Journal of human reproductive sciences, 2009. 2(2):90–2.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, D, Primary peritoneal pregnancy; rationalization or established entity? Omental transference as an alternative explanation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1958. 76(3):523–32.Google Scholar
Paternoster, DM, Santarossa, C, Primary abdominal pregnancy. A case report. Minerva ginecologica, 1999. 51(6):251–3.Google Scholar
Dmowski, WP, et al., Retroperitoneal subpancreatic ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy: how did it get there? Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2002. 19(2):90–3.Google Scholar
Iwama, H, et al., A case of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy following IVF-ET in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy. American journal of perinatology, 2008. 25(1):33–6.Google Scholar
Fisch, B, et al., Abdominal pregnancy following in vitro fertilization in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy. Obstetrics and gynecology, 1996. 88(4 Pt 2):642–3.Google Scholar
Rubin, I, Cervical Pregnancy Surg Gynecol Obstet., 1911. 13:625.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, O, Zur Kasuistik der Ovarialschwangerschaf. Arch Gynaekol, 1878. 13:471–3.Google Scholar
Rausch, ME, Barnhart, KT, Serum biomarkers for detecting ectopic pregnancy. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. 55(2):418–23.Google Scholar
Barash, JH, Buchanan, EM, Hillson, C, Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. American family physician, 2014. 90(1):34–40.Google Scholar
Seifer, DB, Persistent ectopic pregnancy: an argument for heightened vigilance and patient compliance. Fertility and sterility, 1997. 68(3):402–04.Google Scholar
Seifer, DB, et al., Comparison of persistent ectopic pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology, 1993. 81(3):378–82.Google Scholar
Mol, F, et al., Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England), 2014. 383(9927):1483–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, et al., Clinical characteristics of persistent ectopic pregnancy after salpingostomy and influence on ongoing pregnancy. J Obstet and Gynaecol Res., 2017;43(3):564–70.Google Scholar

References

Stanek, J, Drummond, Z. Occult placenta accreta: the missing link in the diagnosis of abnormal placentation. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2007:20(5):387–93.Google Scholar
Sherer, DM, Salafia, CM, Minior, VK, Sanders, M, Ernst, L, Vintzileos, AM. Placental basal plate myometrial fibers: clinical correlations of abnormally deep trophoblast invasion. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(3):444–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, RL, Miller, ES, Lim, G, Ernst, LM. Adherent basal plate myometrial fibers in the delivered placenta as a risk factor for development of subsequent placenta accreta. Placenta. 2015;36(12):1419–24.Google Scholar
Miller, ES, Linn, RL, Ernst, LM. Does the presence of placental basal plate myometrial fibres increase the risk of subsequent morbidly adherent placenta: a case-control study. BJOG. 2016;123(13):2140–5.Google Scholar
Khong, TY, Werger, AC. Myometrial fibers in the placental basal plate can confirm but do not necessarily indicate clinical placenta accreta. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(5):703–8.Google Scholar
Timor-Tritsch, IE, Monteagudo, A, Cali, G, Vintzileos, A, Viscarello, R, Al-Khan, A, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(3):346–53.Google Scholar
Wortman, AC, Alexander, JM. Placenta accreta, increta, and percreta. Obstet Gynecol Clin of North Am. 2013;40(1):137–54.Google Scholar
Abuhamad, A. Morbidly adherent placenta. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(5):359–64.Google Scholar
Bailit, JL, Grobman, WA, Rice, MM, Reddy, UM, Wapner, RJ, Varner, MW, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta treatments and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):683–9.Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, Leveno, KJ, Spong, CY, Thom, EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–32.Google Scholar
Wu, S, Kocherginsky, M, Hibbard, JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1458–61.Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Fox, KA, Barton, JR, Abuhamad, AZ, Simhan, H, Huls, CK, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):561–8.Google Scholar
Jauniaux, E, Collins, SL, Jurkovic, D, Burton, GJ. Accreta placentation: a systematic review of prenatal ultrasound imaging and grading of villous invasiveness. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):712–21.Google Scholar
Berkley, EM, Abuhamad, AZ. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: is sonography all we need? J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(8):1345–50.Google Scholar
Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, Saade, GR, Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited P. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(5):745–57.Google Scholar
Tantbirojn, P, Crum, CP, Parast, MM. Pathophysiology of placenta creta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta. 2008;29(7):639–45.Google Scholar
Kastner, ES, Figueroa, R, Garry, D, Maulik, D. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(6):971–5.Google Scholar
Oyelese, Y, Smulian, JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):927–41.Google Scholar
Committee opinion no. 529: placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):207–11.Google Scholar
Fox, KA, Shamshirsaz, AA, Carusi, D, Secord, AA, Lee, P, Turan, OM, et al. Conservative management of morbidly adherent placenta: expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):755–60.Google Scholar
Gellersen, B, Brosens, IA, Brosens, JJ. Decidualization of the human endometrium: mechanisms, functions, and clinical perspectives. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25(6):445–53.Google Scholar
Gargett, CE, Nguyen, HP, Ye, L. Endometrial regeneration and endometrial stem/progenitor cells. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2012;13(4):235–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laban, M, Ibrahim, EA, Elsafty, MS, Hassanin, AS. Placenta accreta is associated with decreased decidual natural killer (dNK) cells population: a comparative pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:284–8.Google Scholar
Schwede, S, Alfer, J, von Rango, U. Differences in regulatory T-cell and dendritic cell pattern in decidual tissue of placenta accreta/increta cases. Placenta. 2014;35(6):378–85.Google Scholar
Duzyj, CM, Buhimschi, IA, Motawea, H, Laky, CA, Cozzini, G, Zhao, G, et al. The invasive phenotype of placenta accreta extravillous trophoblasts associates with loss of E-cadherin. Placenta. 2015;36(6):645–51.Google Scholar
Dannheim, K, Shainker, SA, Hecht, JL. Hysterectomy for placenta accreta; methods for gross and microscopic pathology examination. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(5):951–8.Google Scholar
Parra-Herran, C, Djordjevic, B. Histopathology of Placenta Creta: Chorionic Villi Intrusion into Myometrial Vascular Spaces and Extravillous Trophoblast Proliferation are Frequent and Specific Findings With Implications for Diagnosis and Pathogenesis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2016;35(6):497–508.Google Scholar
Adler, E, Madankumar, R, Rosner, M, Reznik, SE. Increased placental trophoblast inclusions in placenta accreta. Placenta. 2014;35(12):1075–8.Google Scholar
Ernst, LM, Linn, RL, Minturn, L, Miller, ES. Placental Pathologic Associations with Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Potential insights into Pathogenesis. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2017;20(5):387–93.Google Scholar
Naghshineh, E, Khorvash, E, Kamali, S. A comparison of cell-free placental messenger ribonucleic acid and color Doppler ultrasound for the prediction of placental invasion in patients with placenta accreta. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:31.Google Scholar
Wehrum, MJ, Buhimschi, IA, Salafia, C, Thung, S, Bahtiyar, MO, Werner, EF, et al. Accreta complicating complete placenta previa is characterized by reduced systemic levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of the invasive trophoblast. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(5):411 e1–e11.Google Scholar
Cramer, SF, Heller, DS. Placenta Accreta and Placenta Increta: An Approach to Pathogenesis Based on the Trophoblastic Differentiation Pathway. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2016;19(4):320–33.Google Scholar
Ernst, LM, Ruchelli, ED, Huff, DS. Color atlas of fetal and neonatal histology. New York: Springer; 2011.Google Scholar
Qiao, B, Zhang, Z, Li, Y. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(7):1040–8.Google Scholar
Qian, ZD, Guo, QY, Huang, LL. Identifying risk factors for recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):129–34 e1.Google Scholar
Naji, O, Daemen, A, Smith, A, Abdallah, Y, Bradburn, E, Giggens, R, et al. Does the presence of a cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(5):557–61.Google Scholar
Gao, L, Huang, Z, Zhang, X, Zhou, N, Huang, X, Wang, X. Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy – a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;200:102–7.Google Scholar
Kamaya, A, Krishnarao, PM, Folkins, AK, Jeffrey, RB, Desser, TS, Maturen, KE. Variable color Doppler sonographic appearances of retained products of conception: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(7):2683–9.Google Scholar
Endler, M, Saltvedt, S, Papadogiannakis, N. Macroscopic and histological characteristics of retained placenta: A prospectively collected case-control study. Placenta. 2016;41:39–44.Google Scholar

References

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 115(6):1279–95.Google Scholar
Landon, MB, et al., Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med, 2004. 351(25):2581–9.Google Scholar
Usta, IM, et al., Pregnancy outcome in patients with previous uterine rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007. 86(2):172–6.Google Scholar
Dahiya, P, et al., Placenta Accreta Causing Uterine Rupture in Second Trimester of Pregnancy after in vitro Fertilization: A Case Report. J Reprod Infertil, 2012. 13(1):61–3.Google Scholar
Hornemann, A, et al., Spontaneous uterine rupture at the 21st week of gestation caused by placenta percreta. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011. 284(4):875–8.Google Scholar
Gyamfi-Bannerman, C, et al., Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstet Gynecol, 2012. 120(6):1332–7.Google Scholar
Dow, M, et al., Third-trimester uterine rupture without previous cesarean: a case series and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol, 2009. 26(10):739–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porreco, RP, et al., The changing specter of uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009. 200(3):269 e1–4.Google Scholar
Kieser, KE, Baskett, TF, A 10-year population-based study of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol, 2002. 100(4):749–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Chibber, R, et al., Uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome–how safe is it? A 25-year study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2010. 23(5):421–4.Google Scholar
Gibbins, KJ, et al., Maternal and fetal morbidity associated with uterine rupture of the unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 213(3):382 e1–6.Google Scholar
Al-Zirqi, I, et al., Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG, 2016. 123(5):780–7.Google Scholar
Ofir, K, et al., Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003. 189(4):1042–6.Google Scholar
Thisted, DL, Mortensen, LH, Krebs, L, Uterine rupture without previous caesarean delivery: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2015. 195:151–5.Google Scholar
Berhe, Y, Wall, LL, Uterine rupture in resource-poor countries. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2014. 69(11):695–707.Google Scholar
Pepin, M, et al., Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type. N Engl J Med, 2000. 342(10):673–80.Google Scholar
Chauhan, SP, et al., Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003. 189(2):408–17.Google Scholar
Barger, MK, et al., Maternal and newborn outcomes following uterine rupture among women without versus those with a prior cesarean. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013. 26(2):183–7.Google Scholar
Wen, SW, et al., Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 1991–2001. CMAJ, 2005. 173(7):759–64.Google Scholar
Kaczmarczyk, M, et al., Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG, 2007. 114(10):1208–14.Google Scholar
Thaddeus, S, Maine, D, Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med, 1994. 38(8):1091–110.Google Scholar

References

ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol, 2006. 108(4): p. 1039–47.Google Scholar
Hancock, A, Weeks, AD, Lavender, DT, Is accurate and reliable blood loss estimation the ‘crucial step’ in early detection of postpartum haemorrhage: an integrative review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2015. 15: p. 230.Google Scholar
Abdul-Kadir, R, Mclintock, C, Ducloy, AS, et al., Evaluation and management of postpartum hemorrhage: consensus from an international expert panel. Transfusion, 2014. 54(7): p. 1756–68.Google Scholar
Mhyre, JM, Shilkrut, A, Kuklina, EV, et al., Massive blood transfusion during hospitalization for delivery in New York State, 1998–2007. Obstet Gynecol, 2013. 122(6): p. 1288–94.Google Scholar
Glaze, S, Ekwalanga, P, Roberts, G, et al., Peripartum hysterectomy: 1999 to 2006. Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 111(3): p. 732–8.Google Scholar
Rossi, AC, Lee, RH, Chmait, RH, Emergency postpartum hysterectomy for uncontrolled postpartum bleeding: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 115(3): p. 637–44.Google Scholar
Carroli, G, Cuesta, C, Abalos, E, et al., Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2008. 22(6): p. 999–1012.Google Scholar
Lu, MC, Fridman, M, Korst, LM, et al., Variations in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage across hospitals in California. Matern Child Health J, 2005. 9(3): p. 297–306.Google Scholar
Callaghan, WM, Kuklina, EV, Berg, CJ, Trends in postpartum hemorrhage: United States, 1994–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 202(4): p. 353 e1–6.Google Scholar
Kramer, MS, Berg, C, Abenhaim, H, et al., Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013. 209(5): p. 449 e1–7.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, G, Arulkumaran, S, Postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2006. 28(11): p. 967–73.Google Scholar
Bateman, BT, Berman, MF, Riley, L, et al., The epidemiology of postpartum hemorrhage in a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Anesth Analg, 2010. 110(5): p. 1368–73.Google Scholar
Muench, MV, Baschat, AA, Malinow, AM, et al., Analysis of disease in the obstetric intensive care unit at a university referral center: a 24-month review of prospective data. J Reprod Med, 2008. 53(12): p. 914–20.Google Scholar
Khan, KS, Wojdyla, D, Say, L, et al., WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet, 2006. 367(9516): p. 1066–74.Google Scholar
Bodelon, C, Bernab-Ortiz, A, Schiff, MA, et al., Factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol, 2009. 114(1): p. 115–23.Google Scholar
Oyelese, Y, Ananth, CV, Postpartum hemorrhage: epidemiology, risk factors, and causes. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 53(1): p. 147–56.Google Scholar
Giambattista, E, Ossola, MW, Duiella, SF, et al., Predicting factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy in women with placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2012. 285(4): p. 901–6.Google Scholar
Shih, IM, Kurman, RJ, The pathology of intermediate trophoblastic tumors and tumor-like lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2001. 20(1): p. 31–47.Google Scholar
Liu, G, Yuan, B, Wang, Y, Exaggerated placental site leading to postpartum hemorrhage: a case report. J Reprod Med, 2013. 58(9–10): p. 448–50.Google Scholar
Nugent, D, Hassadia, A, Everard, J, et al., Postpartum choriocarcinoma presentation, management and survival. J Reprod Med, 2006. 51(10): p. 819–24.Google Scholar
Akrivis, Ch, Varras, M, Bellou, A, Kitsiou, E, Stefanaki, S, Antoniou, N, Primary postpartum haemorrhage due to a large submucosal nonpedunculated uterine leiomyoma: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2003. 30(2–3): p. 156–8.Google Scholar
Chung, TK, Chan, MY, Stock, AI, Myomectomy in the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1994. 101(1): p. 73–4.Google Scholar
Tower, AM, Cronin, B, Myomectomy after a vaginal delivery to treat postpartum hemorrhage resulting from an intracavitary leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 125(5): p. 1110–3.Google Scholar
Chummun, K, et al., Severe Postcoital Bleeding From a Uterine Artery Pseudoaneurysm 4 Months After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 126(3): p. 638–41.Google Scholar
Breathnach, F, Geary, M, Uterine atony: definition, prevention, nonsurgical management, and uterine tamponade. Semin Perinatol, 2009. 33(2): p. 82–7.Google Scholar
Hernandez, JS, Nuangchammong, N, Ziadie, M, et al., Placental and uterine pathology in women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol, 2012. 119(6): p. 1137–42.Google Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Leindecker, S, Landon, M, et al., The MFMU Cesarean Registry: uterine atony after primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005. 193(3 Pt 2): p. 1056–60.Google Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Landon, M, Leveno, KJ, et al., The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004. 191(1): p. 211–6.Google Scholar
Baskett, TF, A flux of the reds: evolution of active management of the third stage of labour. J R Soc Med, 2000. 93(9): p. 489–93.Google Scholar
Mousa, HA, Blum, J, Abou el Senoun, G, et al., Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014(2): p. CD003249.Google Scholar
Forna, F, Miles, AM, Jamieson, DJ, Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004. 190(5): p. 1440–4.Google Scholar
Imudia, AN, Awonuga, AO, Dbouk, T, et al., Incidence, trends, risk factors, indications for, and complications associated with cesarean hysterectomy: a 17-year experience from a single institution. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2009. 280(4): p. 619–23.Google Scholar
Muench, MV, Baschat, AA, Oyelese, Y, et al., Gravid hysterectomy: a decade of experience at an academic referral center. J Reprod Med, 2008. 53(4): p. 271–8.Google Scholar
Weeks, AD, The retained placenta. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2008. 22(6): p. 1103–17.Google Scholar
Cheung, WM, Hawkes, A, Ibish, S, et al., The retained placenta: historical and geographical rate variations. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011. 31(1): p. 37–42.Google Scholar
Sellmyer, MA, Desser, TS, Maturen, KE, et al., Physiologic, histologic, and imaging features of retained products of conception. Radiographics, 2013. 33(3): p. 781–96.Google Scholar
Khong, TY, Khong, TK, Delayed postpartum hemorrhage: a morphologic study of causes and their relation to other pregnancy disorders. Obstet Gynecol, 1993. 82(1): p. 17–22.Google Scholar
Ashwal, E, Melamed, N, Hiersch, L, et al., The incidence and risk factors for retained placenta after vaginal delivery – a single center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014. 27(18): p. 1897–900.Google Scholar
Coviello, EM, Grantz, KL, Huang, CC, et al., Risk factors for retained placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 213(6): p. 864 e1–864 e11.Google Scholar
Endler, M, Saltvedt, S, Cnattingius, S, et al., Retained placenta is associated with pre-eclampsia, stillbirth, giving birth to a small-for-gestational-age infant, and spontaneous preterm birth: a national register-based study. BJOG, 2014. 121(12): p. 1462–70.Google Scholar
Balayla, J, Bondarenko, HD, Placenta accreta and the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Perinat Med, 2013. 41(2): p. 141–9.Google Scholar
Deckers, EA, Stamm, CA, Naake, VL, et al., Hysterotomy for retained placenta in a term angular pregnancy. A case report. J Reprod Med, 2000. 45(2): p. 153–5.Google Scholar
Endler, M, Grunewald, C, Saltvedt, S, Epidemiology of retained placenta: oxytocin as an independent risk factor. Obstet Gynecol, 2012. 119(4): p. 801–9.Google Scholar
Endler, M, Saltvedt, S, Papadogiannakis, N, Macroscopic and histological characteristics of retained placenta: A prospectively collected case-control study. Placenta, 2016. 41: p. 39–44.Google Scholar
Stanek, J, Drummond, Z, Occult placenta accreta: the missing link in the diagnosis of abnormal placentation. Pediatr Dev Pathol, 2007. 10(4): p. 266–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alufi, A, Mizrachi, Y, Lurie, S, Reoccurrence of retained placenta at a subsequent delivery: an observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2016: p. 1–4.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, KE, Sellers, S, Spark, P, et al., The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study. BJOG, 2014. 121(1): p. 62–70; discussion 70–1.Google Scholar
Fox, KA, Shamshirsaz, AA, Carusi, D, et al., Conservative management of morbidly adherent placenta: expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 213(6): p. 755–60.Google Scholar
Weydert, JA, Benda, JA, Subinvolution of the placental site as an anatomic cause of postpartum uterine bleeding: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2006. 130(10): p. 1538–42.Google Scholar
Kavalar, R, Arko, D, Fokter Dovnik, N, et al., Subinvolution of placental bed vessels: case report and review of the literature. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2012. 124(19–20): p. 725–30.Google Scholar
Costa, MA, Calejo, LI, Martinez-de-Oliveira, J, et al., Late-onset postpartum hemorrhage from placental bed subinvolution: a case report. J Reprod Med, 2005. 50(7): p. 557–60.Google Scholar
Andrew, AC, Bulmer, JN, Wells, M, et al., Subinvolution of the uteroplacental arteries in the human placental bed. Histopathology, 1989. 15(4): p. 395–405.Google Scholar
Lyall, F, Priming and remodelling of human placental bed spiral arteries during pregnancy–a review. Placenta, 2005. 26 Suppl A: p. S31–6.Google Scholar
Khong, TY, Abdul Rahman, H, Bcl-2 expression delays postpartum involution of pregnancy-induced vascular changes in the human placental bed. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 1997. 16(2): p. 138–42.Google Scholar
Ober, WB, Grady, HG, Subinvolution of the placental site. Bull N Y Acad Med, 1961. 37: p. 713–30.Google Scholar
Al-Mehaisen, L, Al-Kuran, O, Amarin, ZO, et al., Secondary postpartum hemorrhage following placental site vessel subinvolution: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2008. 278(6): p. 585–7.Google Scholar
Farley, NJ, Kohlmeier, RE, A death due to subinvolution of the uteroplacental arteries. J Forensic Sci, 2011. 56(3): p. 803–5.Google Scholar
Brosens, JJ, Pijnenborg, R, Brosens, IA, The myometrial junctional zone spiral arteries in normal and abnormal pregnancies: a review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002. 187(5): p. 1416–23.Google Scholar
Pijnenborg, R, Vercruysse, L, Hanssens, M, The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy: facts and controversies. Placenta, 2006. 27(9–10): p. 939–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×