Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- 1 Food Webs versus Interaction Networks: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
- 2 What Kind of Interaction-Type Diversity Matters for Community Stability?
- 3 Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Beyond: The Crucial Role of Interaction Strength in the Complexity–Stability Debate
- 4 Ecologically Effective Population Sizes and Functional Extinction of Species in Ecosystems
- 5 Merging Antagonistic and Mutualistic Bipartite Webs: A First Step to Integrate Interaction Diversity into Network Approaches
- 6 Toward Multiplex Ecological Networks: Accounting for Multiple Interaction Types to Understand Community Structure and Dynamics
- 7 Unpacking Resilience in Food Webs: An Emergent Property or a Sum of the Parts?
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
1 - Food Webs versus Interaction Networks: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
from Part I - Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2017
Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- 1 Food Webs versus Interaction Networks: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
- 2 What Kind of Interaction-Type Diversity Matters for Community Stability?
- 3 Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Beyond: The Crucial Role of Interaction Strength in the Complexity–Stability Debate
- 4 Ecologically Effective Population Sizes and Functional Extinction of Species in Ecosystems
- 5 Merging Antagonistic and Mutualistic Bipartite Webs: A First Step to Integrate Interaction Diversity into Network Approaches
- 6 Toward Multiplex Ecological Networks: Accounting for Multiple Interaction Types to Understand Community Structure and Dynamics
- 7 Unpacking Resilience in Food Webs: An Emergent Property or a Sum of the Parts?
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adaptive Food WebsStability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems, pp. 9 - 18Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Allesina, S. (2009). Cycling and cycling indices. In Ecosystem Ecology, ed. Jorgensen, S. E., Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 50–57.Google Scholar
Allesina, S. and Tang, S. (2012). Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature, 483, 205–208.Google Scholar
Banašek-Richter, C., Cattin, M.-F., and Bersier, L.-F. (2004). Sampling effects and the robustness of quantitative and qualitative food-web descriptors. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 226, 23–32.Google Scholar
Bastolla, U., Fortuna, M. A., Pascual-García, A., et al. (2009). The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature, 458, 1018–1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benadi, G., Blüthgen, N., Hovestadt, T., and Poethke, H. J. (2012). Population dynamics of plant and pollinator communities: Stability reconsidered. The American Naturalist, 179, 157–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blüthgen, N. (2010). Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist’s guide. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blüthgen, N., Fründ, J., Vázquez, D. P., and Menzel, F. (2008). What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? Ecology, 89, 3387–3399.Google Scholar
Boit, A., Martinez, N. D., Williams, R. J., and Gaedke, U. (2012). Mechanistic theory and modelling of complex food-web dynamics in Lake Constance. Ecology Letters, 15, 594–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, T. J. (2000). An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cazelles, K., Araújo, M. B., Mouquet, N., and Gravel, D. (2016). A theory for species co-occurrence in interaction networks. Theoretical Ecology, 9, 39–48.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (1978). Food Webs and Niche Space. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1859). The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Dormann, C. F., Blüthgen, N., Fründ, J., and Gruber, B. (2009). Indices, graphs and null models: Analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecology Journal, 2, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortuna, M. A., Krishna, A., and Bascompte, J. (2013). Habitat loss and the disassembly of mutalistic networks. Oikos, 122(6), 938–942.Google Scholar
Fründ, J., Dormann, C. F., and Tscharntke, T. (2011). Linné’s floral clock is slow without pollinators: Flower closure and plant–pollinator interaction webs. Ecology Letters, 14, 896–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fussmann, G. F. and Heber, G. (2002). Food web complexity and chaotic population dynamics. Ecology Letters, 5, 394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldwasser, L. and Roughgarden, J. (1997). Sampling effects and the estimation of food-web properties. Ecology, 78, 41–54.Google Scholar
Ings, T. C., Montoya, J. M., Bascompte, J., et al. (2009). Ecological networks: Beyond food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 253–269.Google Scholar
Ives, A. R. and Cardinale, B. J. (2004). Food-web interactions govern the resistance of communities after non-random extinctions. Nature, 429, 174–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, A., Pitchford, J. W., and Plank, M. J. (2012). Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature, 487, 227–230.Google Scholar
Joppa, L. N., Bascompte, J., Montoya, J. M., et al. (2009). Reciprocal specialization in ecological networks. Ecology Letters, 12, 961–969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordano, P. (1987). Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: Connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. American Naturalist, 129, 657–677.Google Scholar
Kéfi, S., Berlow, E. L., Wieters, E., et al. (2012). More than a meal… Integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. Ecology Letters, 15, 291–300.Google Scholar
Martinez, N. D., Hawkins, B., Dawah, H. A., and Feifarek, B. P. (1999). Effects of sampling effort on characterization of food-web structure. Ecology, 80, 1044–1055.Google Scholar
May, R. M. (1973). Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Melian, C. J. and Bascompte, J. (2002). Food web structure and habitat loss. Ecology Letters, 5, 37–46.Google Scholar
Montoya, J. M., Pimm, S. L., and Solé, R. V. (2006). Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature, 442, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales-Castilla, I., Matias, M. G., Gravel, D., and Araújo, M. B. (2015). Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30, 347–356.Google Scholar
Morris, R. J., Gripenberg, S., Lewis, O. T., and Roslin, T. (2014). Antagonistic interaction networks are structured independently of latitude and host guild. Ecology Letters, 17, 340–349.Google Scholar
Murdoch, W. W., Kendall, B. E., Nisbet, R. M., et al. (2002). Single-species models for many-species food webs. Nature, 417, 541–543.Google Scholar
Neutel, A.-M. and Thorne, M. A. S. (2014). Interaction strengths in balanced carbon cycles and the absence of a relation between ecosystem complexity and stability. Ecology Letters, 17, 651–661.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A. and Bascompte, J. (2007). Ecological networks, nestedness and sampling effort. Journal of Ecology, 95, 1134–1141.Google Scholar
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Elberling, H., and Jordano, P. (2008). Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. Ecology, 89, 1573–1582.Google Scholar
Pocock, M. J. O., Evans, D. M., and Memmott, J. (2012). The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks. Science, 335, 973–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuman, D. C., Mulder, C., Raffaelli, D., and Cohen, J. E. (2008). Three allometric relations of population density to body mass: Theoretical integration and empirical tests in 149 food webs. Ecology Letters, 11, 1216–1228.Google Scholar
Rossberg, A. G. (2013). Food Webs and Biodiversity: Foundations, Models, Data. Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schleuning, M., Fründ, J., Klein, A.-M., et al. (2012). Specialization of mutualistic interaction networks decreases toward tropical latitudes. Current Biology, 22, 1–7.Google Scholar
Solé, R. V., Alonso, D., and McKane, A. (2002). Self-organized instability in complex ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 357, 667–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sørensen, P. B., Damgaard, C. F., Strandberg, B., et al. (2011). A method for under-sampled ecological network data analysis: Plant-pollination as case study. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 6, 129–139.Google Scholar
Suweis, S., Simini, F., Banavar, J. R., and Maritan, A. (2013). Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks. Nature, 500, 449–452.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. M., Brose, U., Dunne, J. A., et al. (2012). Food webs: Reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 689–697.Google Scholar
Traugott, M., Kamenova, S., and Ruess, L. (2013). Empirically characterising trophic networks: What emerging DNA-based methods, stable isotope and fatty acid analyses can offer. Advances in Ecological Research, 49, 177–224.Google Scholar
Vázquez, D. P. and Aizen, M. A. (2003). Null model analyses of specialization in plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology, 84, 2493–2501.Google Scholar
Vázquez, D. P. and Aizen, M. A. (2006). Community-wide patterns of specialization in plant–pollinator interactions revealed by null models. In Plant–Pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization, ed. Waser, N. M. and Ollerton, J.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 200–219.Google Scholar
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., and Jordano, P. (2005). Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. Ecology Letters, 8, 1088–1094.Google Scholar
Vázquez, D. P., Chacoff, N., and Cagnolo, L. (2009). Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Ecology, 90, 2039–2046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verdú, M. and Valiente-Banuet, A. (2011). The relative contribution of abundance and phylogeny to the structure of plant facilitation networks. Oikos, 120, 1351–1356.Google Scholar
Weiner, C. N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K., and Blüthgen, N. (2014). Land use impacts on mutualistic networks: Disproportional declines in specialized pollinators via changes in flower composition. Ecology, 95, 466–474.Google Scholar
Wells, K. and O’Hara, R. B. (2014). Species interactions: estimating per-individual interaction strength and covariates before simplifying data into per-species ecological networks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 1–8.Google Scholar
Wells, K., Feldhaar, H., and O’Hara, R. B. (2014). Population fluctuations affect inference in ecological networks of multi-species interactions. Oikos, 123, 589–598.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. and Martinez, N. D. (2008). Success and its limits among structural models of complex food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 512–519.Google Scholar
Winfree, R., Williams, N. M., Dushoff, J., and Kremen, C. (2007). Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. Ecology Letters, 10, 1105–1113.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by