Abe, Hideko. 2010. Queer Japanese: Gender and Sexual Identities through Linguistic Practices. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Atherton.Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner and Leiss, Elisabeth (eds.). 2008. Modality-Aspect Interfaces: Implications and Typological Solutions. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23, 231–273.Google Scholar

Ahn, Mikyung and Yap, Foong Ha. 2014. On the diachronic development of Korean SAY evidentials and their extended pragmatic functions. Diachronica 31, 299–336.Google Scholar

Aikawa, Takako. 1998. Nature of local zibun ‘self’ and reflexive-marking in Japanese. Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies 30, 17–52.Google Scholar

Aikawa, Takako. 1999. Reflexives. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 154–190. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Akatsuka, Noriko. 1983. Conditionals. Papers in Japanese Linguisitics 9, 1–33.Google Scholar

Akatsuka, Noriko. 1992. Japanese modals are conditionals. In Brentari, Diane et al. (eds.), The Joy of Grammar, 1–10. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Akinaga, Kazue. 1985. Kyōtsūgo no akusento [Accent of Standard Japanese]. In NHK (ed.), Pronunciation and Accent Dictionary, 70–116. Nihon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.Google Scholar

Akita, Kimi. 2009. A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University.Google Scholar

Akita, Kimi. 2012. Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational analysis of Japanese mimetics. Cognitive Linguistics 23, 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akita, Kimi. 2013. Constraints on the semantic extension of onomatopoeia. The Public Journal of Semiotics 5, 21–37.Google Scholar

Akita, Kimi and Tsujimura, Natsuko. 2016. Mimetics. In Kageyama, Taro and Kishimoto, Hideki (eds.), The Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation, 133–160. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Akita, Kimi and Usuki, Takeshi. 2016. A constructional account of the “optional” quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics 52, 245–275.Google Scholar

Aldridge, Edith. 2011. Analysis and value of Hentai Kanbun as Japanese. JKL 20, 1–15.Google Scholar

Allwood, Jens. 1982. The complex NP constraints in Swedish. In Engdahl, Elisabet and Ejerhed, Eva (eds.), Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages, 15–32. Almqvist & Wilsell.Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery. 1975/1985. Studies in the Syntax of Relative and Comparative Clauses. Garland.Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery. 2007. Relative clauses. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Linguistic Description, 206–236. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aoki, Haruo. 1986. Evidentials in Japanese. In Chafe, Wallace and Nichols, Johanna (eds.), Evidentiality. The Linguistic Coding of Epistomology, 223–238. Ablex.Google Scholar

Aoki, Hiromi. 2011. Some functions of speaker head nods. In Streeck, Jürgen et al. (eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 83–105. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arche, María. 2006. Individuals in Time. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Arisaka, Hideyo. 1959 [1940]. On’inron [Phonology]. Sanseidō.Google Scholar

Arita, Setsuko. 2007. Nihongo jōkenbun to jiseisetsusei [Japanese conditional sentences and tensed clauses]. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Aso, Reiko. 2010. Hateruma. In Shimoji, Michinori and Pellard, Thomas (eds.), An Introduction to Ryukyuan Languages, 189–227. ILCAA.Google Scholar

Aso, Reiko. 2015. Hateruma Yaeyama grammar. In Heinrich, Patrick et al. (eds.), The Handbook of the Ryukyuan Languages, 423–448. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bachnik, Jane and Quinn, Charles (eds.). 1994. Situated Meaning: Inside and Outside in Japanese Self, Society, and Language. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Collin and Fillmore, Charles. 2010. A frame approach to semantic analysis. In Heine, Brent and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 313–339. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Timothy. 1998. The analysis of Japanese relative clauses. ME thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Routledge.Google Scholar

Beebe, Leslie and Takahashi, Tomoko. 1989. Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening acts: Chastisement and disagreement. In Eisenstein, Miriam (ed.), The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical Studies in Second Language Variation, 199–218. Plenum.Google Scholar

Beeching, Kate and Detges, Ulrich (eds.). 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentley, Delia. 2006. Split Intransitivity in Italian. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1958/1971. Problems in General Linguistics. University of Miami Press.Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 2003. Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79, 708–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blevins, Juliette. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory, 206–244. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bloch, Bernard. 1946. Studies in colloquial Japanese I: Inflection. Journal of the American Oriental Society 66, 97–109.Google Scholar

Bloch, Bernard. 1950. Studies in colloquial Japanese IV: Phonemics. Language 26, 86–125.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen and Swift, Mary. 2004. Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 263–296.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18, 1–34.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Accent is predictable (if you’re a mind-reader). Language 48, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1973. Essence and accident: English analogs of Hispanic ser-estar. In Kachru, Braj et al. (eds.), Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, 58–69. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Bossong, Georg. 1985. Differentielle Objectmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Narr.Google Scholar

Brentano, Franz. [1874] 2009. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, trans. Rancurello, Antos et al. Routledge.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 2010. Discourse markers. In Jucker, Andreas and Taavitsinen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brown, Alan. 1985. Review of “The History of the Japanese Written Language” by Yaeko Sato Habein. Pacific Affairs 58, 532–533.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary and Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7, 585–614.Google Scholar

Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Published by Garland, 1980.]Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles (ed.), Subject and Topic, 25–56. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, 35–53. Ablex.Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui. 2013. An expectation-based account of subject islands and parasitism. Journal of Linguistics 49, 285–327.Google Scholar

Chinami, Kyoko. 2007. Hon’yaku-manga ni okeru josei tōjō-jinbutsu no kotoba-zukai: Josei jendā hyōshiki o chūshin ni [Language use of female characters in translated manga: On female gender indexes]. Nihongo to jendā 7 www.gender.jp/journal/no7/02_chinami.html.Google Scholar

Chinami, Kyoko. 2010. Manga: Jendā hyōgen no tayōna imi [Manga: Diverse meanings of gender expressions]. In Nakamura, Momoko (ed.), Jendā de manabu gengogaku [Linguistics taught through gender], 73–87. Sekai Shisōsha.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Anderson, Stephen and Kiparski, Paul (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–285. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on the Government and Binding. Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Barriers. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clancy, Patricia. 1982. Written and spoken style in Japanese narratives. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, 55–76. Ablex.Google Scholar

Clancy, Patricia. 1985. The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, Dan (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol. 1: The Data, 373–524. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Clark, John and Yallop, Colin. 1990. An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Clements, George. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 283–333. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 1997. Local Economy. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design: Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics 1, 59–85.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard and Horie, Kaoru. 1995. Complement clauses versus relative clauses: Some Khmer evidence. In Abraham, Werner et al. (eds.), Discourse Grammar and Typology: Papers in Honor of John W.M. Verhaar, 65–75. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard and Thompson, Sandra. 2007. Lexical nominalization. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume 3, 334–381. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 1992. Meaning of non-referential indexes: A case study of the Japanese sentence-final particle ne. Text 12, 507–539.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 1996a. Japanese language socialization: Indexing the modes of self. Discourse Processes 22, 171–197.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 1996b. The use of addressee honorifics in Japanese elementary school classroom. JKL 5, 67–81.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 1997. The role of the Japanese masu form in caregiver–child conversation. JP 28, 695–718.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 2002. The social meanings of the Japanese plain form. JKL 10, 150–163.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 2006. Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: Academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Multilingua 25, 269–292.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 2008. Organization of turns, speech styles and postures in a Japanese elementary school. In Mori, Junko and Ohta, Amy (eds.), Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives, 80–108. Continuum.Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko. 2012. A response to “Against the social constructionist account of Japanese politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research 8, 269–276.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 1985. Direct and indirect speech: General problems and problems of Japanese. JP 9, 41–63.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 2003. Writing Systems. An Introduction to Their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 2013. Writing and Society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 2016. Guardians of Language. Twenty Voices through History. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Kortmann, Bernd. 2000. Introduction. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Kortmann, Bernd (eds.), Cause–Condition–Concession–Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 1–8. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2007. ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 17, 513–552.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cuenca, Maria Josep. 2013. The fuzzy limits between discourse marking and modal marking. In Degand, Liesbeth et al. (eds.), Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, 191–216. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Culy, Christopher. 1990. The syntax and semantics of internally headed relative clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Culy, Christopher. 1997. Logophoric pronouns and point of view. Linguistics 35, 845–859.Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. Reprinted in Davidson, Donald (1980), Essays on Actions and Events, 105–122. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Judy. 1984. Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Atkinson, Maxwell and Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 102–128. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, Stuart. 1989. On a non-argument for the rhyme. Journal of Linguistics 25, 211–217.Google Scholar

Davis, Stuart. 2011. Quantity. In Goldsmith, John et al. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 103–140. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

De Wolf, Charles. 1987. Wa in diachronic perspective. In Hinds, John et al. (eds.), Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese Wa, 265–290. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Deane, Paul. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Degand, Liesbeth. 2014. ‘So very fast very fast then’: Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In Beeching, Kate and Detges, Ulrich (eds.), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 151–178. Brill.Google Scholar

Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert, and Pietandrea, Paola (eds.). Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Deguchi, Masanori. 2012. Revisiting the thetic/categorical distinction in Japanese. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 48, 223–237.Google Scholar

Detges, Ulrich. 2015. Review of “Liesbeth Degand et al. (eds.) Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description.” Functions of Language 22, 132–141.Google Scholar

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2013. “Same same but different”: Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Degand, Liesbeth et al. (eds.), Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, 19–46. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. CLS 8, 440–447.Google Scholar

Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55, 59–138.Google Scholar

Dore, Ronald. 1965. The legacy of Tokugawa education. In Jansen, Marius (ed.), Changing Japanese Attitudes toward Modernization, 99–131. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Downing, Laura. 2011. Bantu tone. In van Oostendorp, Marc et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology 5, 2730–2753. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English nominal compounds. Language 55, 810–842.Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew and Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Digital Library. http://wals.info/Google Scholar

Duanmu, San. 2009. Syllable Structure. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, Cynthia. 1999. Public and private voices: Japanese style shifting and the display of affective intensity. In Palmer, Gary and Occhi, Debra (eds.), Languages of Sentiment: Cultural Constructions of Emotional Substrates, 107–127. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dunn, Cynthia. 2005. Pragmatic functions of humble forms in Japanese ceremonial discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15, 218–238.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eda, Sanae. 2001. A new approach to the analysis of the sentence final particles ne and yo: An interface between prosody and pragmatics. JKL 9, 167–180.Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Ehrich, Susan, Meyerhoff, Miriam, and Holmes, Janet (eds.). 2014. The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Endo, Orie. 1997. Onna no kotoba no bunkashi [A cultural history of Japanese women’s language]. Gakuyō.Google Scholar

Enyo, Yumiko. 2015. Contexts and meaning of Japanese speech styles: A case of hierarchical identity construction among Japanese college students. Pragmatics 25, 345–367.Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax–Discourse Interface. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Lappin, Shalom. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6, 41–86.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 366–431. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas and Watanabe, Honoré (eds.). 2016. Insubordination. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fayol, Michel and Jaffré, Jean-Pierre. 2014. L’ortographe. Pressses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Fernald, Theodore. 2000. Predicates and Temporal Arguments. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–138. Hanshin.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1987. Varieties of conditional sentences. Proceedings of the Third Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 163–182. Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1988. The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar.” BLS 14, 35–55.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1990. Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. CLS 26, 137–162.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles and Baker, Collin. 2010. A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Bernd, Heine and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 791–816. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul, and O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let Alone. Language 64, 501–538.Google Scholar

Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. Routledge.Google Scholar

Foley, William and Van Valin, Robert. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ford, Cecilia and Thompson, Sandra. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Ochs, Elinor et al. (eds.), Interaction and Grammar, 134–184. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara, Hayashi, Makoto, and Jasperson, Robert 1996. Syntactic projectability in Japanese conversation. Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Ochs, Elinor et al. (eds.), Interaction and Grammar, 185–237. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? JP 31, 931–953.Google Scholar

Frellesvig, Bjarke. 2010. A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frellesvig, Bjarke and Whitman, John. 2008. Proto-Japanese: Issue and Prospects. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Frellesvig, Bjarke, Horn, Stephen, and Yanagida, Yuko. 2015. Differential object marking in Old Japanese: A corpus based study. In Haug, Dag (ed.), Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 195–211. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria. 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47, 27–52.Google Scholar

Fudge, E.C. 1969. Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5, 253–286.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 1989. Concessive conditionals in Japanese: A pragmatic analysis of the S1-TEMO S2 construction. BLS 15, 291–302.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 1990. Counterfactual concessive conditionals in Japanese. JKL 1, 353–367.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 1992a. On the clause-linking TO construction in Japanese. JKL 2, 3–19.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 1992b. On the idiomaticity of conditional constructions in Japanese. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Linguists, 59–62. Les Presses de L’université Lavel.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 1993. The use and learning of clause-linkage: Case studies in Japanese and English conditionals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 1996. Mental-space builders: Observations from English and Japanese conditionals. In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics, 72–90. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 2000. Incipient decategorization of MONO and grammaticalization of speaker attitude in Japanese discourse. In Andersen, Gisle and Fretheim, Thonstein (eds.), Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude, 85–118. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 2004. Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types: The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Fried, Mirjam and Östman, Jan-Ola (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, 121–155. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 2012. On conditional constructions. In Sawada, Harumi (ed.), Constructions and Meanings, 107–131. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Fujii, Seiko. 2013. Conditional constructions as discourse markers in Japanese: Toward a typology of their form and function. Language Information Text 20, 87–101.Google Scholar

Fukada, Atsushi and Asato, Noriko. 2004. Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. JP 36, 1991–2002.Google Scholar

Fukuda, Shinichiro. 2006. Japanese passive, external arguments, and structural case. UCSD Linguistics Papers 2, 86–133.Google Scholar

Fukuda, Shinichiro. 2015. Review: Tomoko Ishizuka. The passive in Japanese: A cartographic minimalist approach. Linguistic Variation 15, 291–298.Google Scholar

Fukui, Naoki. 1986. A theory of category projection and its applications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Fukushima, Saeko. 2000. Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Lang.Google Scholar

Fukushima, Saeko. 2004. Evaluation of politeness: the case of attentiveness. Multilingua 23, 365–388.Google Scholar

Fukushima, Saeko and Haugh, Michael. 2014. The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: The metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. JP 74, 165–179.Google Scholar

Fukuzawa, Yukichi. 1873. Moji no oshie [Instruction in writing]. http://project.lib.keio.ac.jp/dg_kul/fukuzawa_title.php?id=73Google Scholar

Furo, Hiroko. 1998. Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: Grammar, intonation, and pragmatics. JKL 7, 41–57.Google Scholar

Gagné, Nana. 2010. Reexamining the notion of negative face in the Japanese socio-linguistic politeness of request. Language and Communication 30, 123–138.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 1998. Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies: A commentary. In Schieffelin, Bambi et al. (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, 317–331. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gendai Nihongo Kenkyūkai. 1997. Josei no kotoba: Shokuba hen [Female corpus: In work place]. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Geyer, Naomi. 2008. Discourse and Politeness: Ambivalent Face in Japanese. Continuum.Google Scholar

Geyer, Naomi. 2013. Discernment and variation: The action-oriented use of Japanese addressee honorifics. Mulitlingua 32, 155–176.Google Scholar

Geyer, Naomi. 2016. Constructing appropriateness in Japanese institutional discourse: A case of (non-use of) honorifics. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference. Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Gibson, James. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Shaw, Robert and Bransfold, Johen (eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, 67–82. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gibson, James. 1979/1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Giriko, Mikio. 2009. Nihongo ni okeru go-ninshiki to heibangata akusento [Word recognition and unaccented pattern in Japanese]. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University.Google Scholar

Givόn, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Givόn, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Givón, Talmy (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse, 5–41. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givόn, Talmy. 1984. Syntax, Vol. I. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givόn, Talmy. 2009. Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givόn, Talmy and Shibatani, Masayoshi (eds.). 2009. Syntactic Complexity. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gnanadesikan, Amalia. 2009. The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2013. Constructional approaches. In Hoffman, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, John. 2011. The syllable. In Goldsmith, John et al. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 164–196. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson. 1983. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2003. Pointing as situated practice. In Kita, Sotaro (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, 217–241. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie. 1987. Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1, 1–54.Google Scholar

Goody, Jack. 1968. Introduction. In Goody, Jack (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies, 1–26. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goro, Takuya. 2006. A minimalist analysis of Japanese passives. Minimalist Essays 91, 232.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Nanette. 1995. Kanji Politics. Language Policy and Japanese Script. Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Nanette. 2011. Playing with language in E-Japan: Old wine in new bottles. In Gottlieb, Nanette (ed.), Language in Public Spaces in Japan, 71–85. Routledge.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph (ed.), Universals of Human Language, 73–113. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. (ed.). 1978. Universals of Language: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haberland, Hartmut and van der Auwera, Johan. 1990. Topic and clitics in Greek relatives. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 22, 127–157.Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Understood subjects in English diaries. Multilingua 9, 157–199.Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane and Hill, Virginia. 2014. The syntactization of discourse. In Folli, Raffaella et al. (eds.), Syntax and Its Limits, 370–390. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haga, Yasushi. 1954. Chinjutsu to wa nanimono? [What is chinjutsu?]. Kokugo Kokubun 23, 47–61.Google Scholar

Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69, 287–310.Google Scholar

Haig, John. 1979a. What relative clauses are about. Papers in Linguistics 12, 57–109.Google Scholar

Haig, John. 1979b. Real and apparent multiple subject sentences. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 6, 87–130.Google Scholar

Haig, John. 1981. Are traversal objects objects? Papers in Linguistics 14, 69–101.Google Scholar

Haig, John. 1996. Subjacency and Japanese grammar: A functional account. Studies in Language 20, 53–92.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54, 564–589.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781–819.Google Scholar

Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra (eds.). 1998. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel (eds.), The View from Building 20, 53–109. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hamano, Shoko. 1988. The syntax of mimetic words and iconicity. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 22, 135–149.Google Scholar

Hamano, Shoko. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. CSLI.Google Scholar

Hanazono, Satoru. 1999. Jōkenkei fukugō yōgen keishiki no nintei [The recognition of complex predicate forms based on conditionals]. Kokugogaku 197, 39–90.Google Scholar

Handschuh, Corinna. 2014. A Typology of Marked-S Languages. Language Science.Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge and Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–426.Google Scholar

Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Visconti, Jacqueline (eds.). 2009. Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics. Emerald.Google Scholar

Harada, Shin-Ichi. 1971. Ga-no conversion and idiolectal variations in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 60, 25–38.Google Scholar

Harada, Shin-Ichi. 1973. Counter equi NP deletion. Annual Bulletin 7, 113–147. Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics.Google Scholar

Haraguchi, Shosuke. 1977. The Tone Pattern of Japanese: An Autosegmental Theory of Tonology. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Haraguchi, Shosuke. 1991. A Theory of Stress and Accent. Foris.Google Scholar

Haraguchi, Shosuke. 2003. The phonology-phonetics interface and syllabic theory. In van de Weijer, Jeroen et al. (eds.), The Phonological Spectrum. Vol. 2: Suprasegmental Structure, 31–58. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2000. Rethinking Writing. Athlone.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 1981. A lexical interpretive theory with emphasis on the role of subject. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 1985. On the so-called “zero pronouns” in Japanese. The Linguistic Review 4, 289–341.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 1999. Seisei nihongogaku nyūmon [Introduction to Generative Japanese Linguistics]. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2001. Causatives and the role of v: Agent, causer, and experiencer. In Inoue, Kazuko and Hasegawa, Nobuko (eds.), Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Research. Proceedings of the COE International Symposium, 1–35. Kanda University of International Studies.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2006. Honorifics. In Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 2, 493–543. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2007a. Ichininshō no shōryaku: Modaritī to kureru [The deletion of the first person: Modality and kureru ‘give’]. In Hasegawa, Nobuko (ed.), Nihongo no shubun-genshō: Tōgo-kōzō to modaritī [Main clause phenomena in Japanese: Syntactic structure and modality], 331–369. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2007b. The possessor raising construction and the interpretation of the subject. In Karimi, Simin et al. (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation, 62–99. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2009. Agreement at the CP level: Clause types and the ‘person’ restriction on the subject. The Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics 5, 131–152. MIT.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2010. CP ryōiki kara no kara-shugo no ninka [Licensing null-subjects from the CP area]. In Hasegawa, Nobuko (ed.), Tōgo-ron no shintenkai to nihongo kenkyū: Meidai o koete [New developments in syntactic theory and research in Japanese: Beyond proposition], 31–65. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2011. Shoyūsha-bunri to bun-kōzō: Shudaika kara no hatten [Possessor ascension and clausal structure: An extension from subjectivization]. In Hasegawa, Nobuko (ed.), 70-nendai seisei-bunpō saininshiki: Nihongo kenkyū no chihei [Re-acknowledgement of the 70s generative grammar: The horizon of research in Japanese], 85–121. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Yoko. 1989. Questioning vs. identifying: A functionalist analysis of the [a candidate that which professor recommended was hired?] construction in Japanese. BLS 15, 138–149.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Yoko. 1996. A Study of Japanese Clause Linkage: The Connective TE in Japanese. CSLI and Kurosio.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Yoko. 2010. Soliloquy in Japanese and English. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Yoko. 2012. Against the social constructionist account of Japanese politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 8, 245–268.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Yoko. 2015. Japanese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Yoko and Hirose, Yukio. 2005. What the Japanese language tells us about the alleged Japanese relational self. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25, 219–251.Google Scholar

Hashi, Michiko, Kodama, Akina, Miura, Takao, Daimon, Shotaro, Takakura, Yuki, and Hayashi, Ryoko. 2014. Nihongo gobi hatsuon chōon jittai: X-sen maikurobīmu nihongo hatsuon dētabēsu o mochiite [Articulatory variability in word-final Japanese moraic nasals: An X-ray microbeam study]. Onsei Kenkyū 18, 95–105.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, Norinao. 2002. Ne sa yo undō to sono shūhen [Ne-sa-yo movement and its surrounding]. Paper presented at the sociolinguistic conference, Chiba, Japan.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, Shinkichi. 1935. Shin-bunten: Bekki, jōkyūyō [New grammar: Separate volume, advanced]. Fuzanbō.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, Shinkichi. 1969. Jodōshi no kenkyū [Studies on auxiliaries]. In Joshi-jodōshi no kenkyū [Studies on particles and auxiliaries], 225–420. Iwanami.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, Shiro. 1966. Kodaigo no shijitaikei: Jōdai o chūshin ni [The system of demonstratives in archaic Japanese: Focusing on Old Japanese]. Kokugo Kokubun 35/36, 329–341.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86, 663–687.Google Scholar

Hattori, Shiro. 1954. On’in-ron kara mita nihongo no akusento [A phonological view of Japanese accent]. Kokugo Kenkyū 2, 2–50.Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2007. The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. JP 39, 84–110.Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/politeness Implicatures. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael and Obana, Yasuko. 2011. Politeness in Japanese. In Kádár, Dániel and Mills, Sara (eds.), Politeness in East Asia, 147–175. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John. 1986. A Comparative Typology of English and German. Helm.Google Scholar

Hayano, Kaoru. 2011. Claiming epistemic primacy: Yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In Stivers, Tanya et al. (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 58–81. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto and Mori, Junko. 1998. Co-construction in Japanese revisited: We do finish each other’s sentences. JKL 7, 77–93.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, Mori, Junko, and Tagaki, Tomoyo. 2002. Contingent achievement of co-tellership in a Japanese conversation. In Ford, Cecilia et al. (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence, 81–122. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hayata, Teruhiro. 1999. Onchō no taiporojī [Typology of tone]. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Patrick. 2012. The Making of Monolingual Japan. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity.Google Scholar

Heycock, Caroline. 1993. Syntactic predication in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2, 167–211.Google Scholar

Heyse, Johann Christian August. 1849. Theoretisch-praktische deutsche Grammatik oder Lehrbuch der deutschen Sprache. 5. Völlig umgearbeite und sehr vermehrte Ausgabe [Theoretical-practical German Grammar, or Textbook of the German Language, 5th entirely revised and greatly enhanced edition]. Sahn. (Reprint by G. Olms, Hildesheim, 1972.)Google Scholar

Hibiya, Junko. 1999. Variationist sociolinguistics. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 101–120. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hidaka, Mizuho. 2005. Hōgen ni okeru bunpō-ka [The regional differences of the grammaticalization]. Nihongo no Kenkyū 1, 77–91.Google Scholar

Higashiizumi, Yuko. 2015. Periphery of utterances and (inter)subjectification in Modern Japanese: A case study of competing causal conjunctions and connective particles. In Smith, Andrew et al. (eds.), New Directions in Grammaticalization Research, 135–156. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Higurashi, Yoshiko. 1983. The Accent of Extended Word Structures in Tokyo Standard Japanese. Educa.Google Scholar

Hinds, John. 1978a. Conversational structure: An investigation based on Japanese interview discourse. In Hinds, John and Howard, Irwin (eds.), Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics, 79–121. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Hinds, John. (ed.). 1978b. Anaphora in Discourse. Linguistic Research.Google Scholar

Hinds, John. 1982. Ellipsis in Japanese Discourse. Linguistic Research.Google Scholar

Hinds, John and Tawa, Wako. 1975–1976. Conditions on conditionals in Japanese. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 4, 3–11.Google Scholar

Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Joanna, and Ohala, John. 1994. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40, 67–80.Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, Ken. 2010. Spelling out the double-o constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28, 723–770.Google Scholar

Hirako, Tatsuya. 2016. Izumo hōgen ni okeru kakujoshi ‘ga’ to ‘no’ ni tsuite [On the case particles “ga” and “no” in the Izumo dialect]. In Kibe, Nobuko (ed.), Shōmetsu kikihōgen no chōsa hozon no tame no sōgōteki kenkyū: Izumo hōgen chōsa hōkokusho [General study for research and conservation of endangered dialects in Japan: Research report on Izumo dialect], 69–78. NINJAL.Google Scholar

Hirayama, Teruo. 1951. Kyūshū hōgen onchō no kenkyū [Studies on tone in Kyūshū dialects]. Gakkaino Shishin-sha.Google Scholar

Hirayama, Teruo. 1968. Nihon no hōgen [The Japanese dialects]. Kōdansha.Google Scholar

Hirayama, Teruo. 1998. Tottori ken no kotoba [The Tottori dialect]. Meiji.Google Scholar

Hirose, Kyoko and Ohori, Toshio. 1992. Japanese internally headed relative clauses revisited. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Hirose, Yukio. 1995. Direct and indirect speech as quotations of public and private expression. Lingua 95, 223–238.Google Scholar

Hirose, Yukio. 2000. Public and private self as two aspects of the speaker: A contrastive study of Japanese and English. JP 32, 1623–1656.Google Scholar

Hirose, Yukio. 2002. Viewpoint and the nature of the Japanese reflexive zibun. Cognitive Linguistics 13, 357–401.Google Scholar

Hirose, Yukio. 2014. The conceptual basis for reflexive constructions in Japanese. JP 68, 99–116.Google Scholar

Hirose, Yukio and Yoko, Hasegawa. 2010. Nihongo kara mita nihonjin: Shutaisei no gengogaku [Japanese people as seen from the Japanese language: The linguistics of subjectivity]. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Hirschberg, Julia and Ward, Gregory. 1995. The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. JP 24, 407–412.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles. 1955. A Manual of Phonology. Waverly.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Peter and Sag, Ivan. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86, 366–415.Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip. 2007. Retrievability and gradience in filler-gap dependencies. CLS 43, 109–123.Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical form contraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar

Hong, Sun-ho. 2003. On island constraints in Korean. In Iverson, Gregory and Ahn, Sang-Cheol (eds.), Explorations in Korean Language and Linguistics, 107–125. Hankook.Google Scholar

Hooper, Joan and Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. LI 4, 465–497.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56, 251–299.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul and Traugott, Elizabeth. 1993/2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru. 1993. From zero to overt nominalizer no: A syntactic change in Japanese. JKL 3, 305–321.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru. 1998. Functional duality of case-marking particles in Japanese and its implications for grammaticalization: A contrastive study with Korean. JKL 8, 147–159.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru. 2002. Verbal nouns in Japanese and Korean: Cognitive typological implications. In Kataoka, Kuniyoshi and Ide, Sachiko (eds.), Culture, Interaction, and Language, 77–101. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru. 2008. Grammaticalization of nominalizers in Japanese and its theoretical implications: A contrastive study with Korean. In Seoane, Elena and Lopez-Couso, Maria Jose (eds.). Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspective for the Twenty-first Century, 169–187. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru. 2012. The interactional origin of nominal predicate structure in Japanese: A comparative and historical pragmatic perspective. JP 44, 663–679.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru. 2017. The attributive-final distinction and the manifestation of “main clause phenomena” in Japanese and Korean NMCs. In Matsumoto, Yoshiko et al. (eds.), Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries, 45–57. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru and Pardeshi, Prashant. 2009. Gengo no taiporojī. Ninchi ruikeiron no apurōchi [Linguistic typology. A cognitive typological approach]. Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru and Narrog, Heiko. 2014. What typology reveals about modality in Japanese: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Kabata, Kaori and Ono, Tsuyoshi (eds.), Usage-Based Approaches to Japanese Grammar, 109–133. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 2010. Multiple negation in English and other languages. In Horn, Laurence (ed.), The Expression of Negation, 111–148. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hoshi, Hiroto. 1999. Passives. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 191–235. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Howard, Irwin. 1978. Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Howard, Irwin and Niyekawa-Howard, Agnes. 1976. Passivization. Japanese Generative Grammar: Syntax and Semantics 5, 201–238.Google Scholar

Huang, James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–574.Google Scholar

Huang, James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29, 423–509.Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 1977. On the nature of linguistic stress. Studies in Stress and Accent. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4, 37–82.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 1985. A Theory of Phonological Weight. Foris.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23, 225–257.Google Scholar

Ichikawa, Takashi. 1978. Kokugo kyōiku no tame no bunshōron gaisetsu [Introduction to Japanese discourse analysis for Japanese education]. Kyōiku.Google Scholar

Ide, Risako. 1998. “Sorry for your kindness”: Japanese interactional ritual in public discourse. JP 29, 509–529.Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1982a. Japanese sociolinguistics: Politeness and women’s language. Lingua 57, 357–385.Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1982b. Taigū hyōgen no danjosa [Gender differences in interpersonal expressions]. In Kunihiro, Tetsuya (ed.), Nichieigo hikaku kōza 5: Bunka to shakai [A comparative study of Japanese and English 5: Culture and society], 105–169. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1989. Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8, 223–248.Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1992. On the notion of wakimae: Toward an integrated framework of linguistic politeness. In Mejiro Linguistic Society (ed.), Mosaic of Language: Essays in Honour of Professor Natsuko Okuda, 298–305. Mejiro Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko and Yoshida, Megumi. 2002. Sociolinguistics: Honorific and gender differences. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 444–480. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko, Hill, Beverley, Carnes, Yukiko M., Ogino, Tsunao, and Kawasaki, Akiko. 1992. The concept of politeness: An empirical study of American English and Japanese. In Watts, Richard et al. (eds.), Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 281–297. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Igarashi, Yosuke. 2014. Typology of intonational phrasing in Japanese dialects. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 525–568. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Igarashi, Yosuke. 2015. Intonation. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, 525–568. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Igarashi, Yosuke, Nishikawa, Ken’ya, Tanaka, Kuniyoshi, and Mazuka, Reiko 2013. Phonological theory informs the analysis of intonational exaggeration in Japanese infant-directed speech. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 134, 1283–1294.Google Scholar

Iida, Masayo. 1996. Context and Binding in Japanese. CSLI.Google Scholar

Ikeda, Yutaka. 1995. Shūjoshi to teineisa [Sentence-final particles and politeness]. Gengo 24, 102–103.Google Scholar

Ikuta, Shoko. 1983. Speech level shift and conversational strategy in Japanese discourse. Language Science 5, 37–53.Google Scholar

Ikuta, Shoko. 2008. Speech style shift as an interactional discourse strategy: The use and non-use of desu/-masu in Japanese conversational interviews. In Jones, Kimberly and Ono, Tsuyoshi (eds.), Style Shifting in Japanese, 71–89. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Imamura, Satoshi. 2014. The influence of givenness of heaviness on OSV in Japanese. Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 224–233. Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar

Inagaki, Kayoko, Hatano, Giyoo, and Otake, Takashi. 2000. The effect of kana literacy on the speech segmentation unit used by Japanese young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 75, 70–91.Google Scholar

Inoue, Kazuko. 1976. Henkei bunpō to Nihongo [Transformational grammar and Japanese]. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Inoue, Kazuko. 1978. “Tough sentences” in Japanese. In Hinds, John and Howard, Irwin (eds.), Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics, 122–154. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Inoue, Kazuko. 2004. Japanese “tough” sentences revisited. Scientific Approaches to Language 3, 75–111. Kanda University of International Studies.Google Scholar

Inoue, Miyako. 2002. Gender, language, and modernity: Toward an effective history of Japanese women’s language. American Ethnologist 29, 392–422.Google Scholar

Inoue, Miyako. 2006. Vicarious Language: Gender and Linguistic Modernity in Japan. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Iori, Isao, Matsuoka, Hiroshi, Nakanishi, Kumiko, Yamada, Toshihiro, and Takanashi, Shino. 2000. Shokyū o oshieru hito no tame no nihongo bunpō handobukku [Handbook of Japanese grammar for teachers of basic Japanese]. Surī Ē Nettowāku.Google Scholar

Irwin, Mark. 2011. Loanwords in Japanese. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2007. Major phrase, focus intonation, multiple spell-out. The Linguistic Review 24, 137–167.Google Scholar

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2015. Syntax-phonology interface. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, 569–618. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ishihara, Shinichi. 2004. An acoustic-phonetic descriptive analysis of Kagoshima Japanese tonal phenomena. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Ishii, Yasuo. 2001. Presuppositional effects of scrambling reconsidered. Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Research: Proceedings of the COE International Symposium, 79–101. Kanda University of International Studies.Google Scholar

Ishizuka, Tomoko. 2012. The Passive in Japanese: A Cartographic Minimalist Approach. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Itakura, Hiroko and Tsui, Amy. 2004. Gender and conversational dominance in Japanese conversation. Language in Society 33, 223–248.Google Scholar

Ito, Junko and Mester, Armin. 2015. Word formation and phonological processes. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, 363–395. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Noriko, Sells, Peter, and Akita, Kimi (eds.). 2017. The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition and Translation. Routledge.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shimako. 2011. The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation. In Streeck, Jürgen et al. (eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 106–120. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1997. The Northridge earthquake conversations: The floor structure and the “loop” sequence in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28, 661–693.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese: Revised Edition: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2015. A multiple-grammar model of speaker’s linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics 26, 161–210.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi and Yap, Foong Ha. 2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. JP 83, 1–9.Google Scholar

Iwata, Seizi. 2005. Locative alternation and two levels of verb meaning. Cognitive Linguistics 16, 355–407.Google Scholar

Izuhara, Eiko. 1994. Kandōshi, kantōjoshi, shūjoshi ne, nē no intonēshon [Intonation of interjectional, insertion, and sentence-final particles ne and nē]. Nihongokyōiku 83, 97–107.Google Scholar

Izuhara, Eiko. 2003. Shūjoshi yo, yone, ne saikō [Reconsidering sentence final particles yo, yone, and ne]. The Journal of Aichi Gakuin University 51, 1–15.Google Scholar

Izutsu, Katsunobu and Izutsu, Mitsuko. 2013. From discourse markers to modal/final particles: What the position reveals about the continuum. In Degand, Liesbeth et al. (eds.), Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, 217–236. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2010. Meaning and the Lexicon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Wesley. 1992a. Are conditionals topics? – The Japanese case. In Brentari, Diane et al. (eds.), The Joy of Grammar, 131–160. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Wesley. 1992b. The Transitive Structure of Events in Japanese. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Wesley. 2002a. On the interaction of temporal and modal meaning in Japanese conditionals. JKL 10, 3–17.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Wesley. 2002b. Multiple times and multiple worlds: Modal and temporal meaning in BA, TEMO, TEWA, and NARA conditionals in Japanese. JKL 11, 352–366.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Wesley. 2007. Reference time, temporal adverbials, and the tense/aspect interface in Japanese. In Frellesvig, Bjarke et al. (eds.), Current Issues in the History and Structure of Japanese, 1–26. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Wesley. 2016. Lexical meaning and temporal aspect in Japanese. In Kageyama, Taro and Kishimoto, Hideki (eds.), The Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation, 531–558. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman and Halle, Morris. 1962. Phonology and phonetics. In Jakobson, Roman (ed.), Selected Writings I: Phonological Studies, 464–504. Mouton.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, Gene (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 13–23. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jensen, Anne. 2001. Sentence intertwining in Danish. In Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth and Harder, Peter (eds.), Ikonicitet og struktur, 23–39. Preprint from Netværk for Funktionel Lingvistik, Department of English, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924/1965. The Philosophy of Grammar. Norton.Google Scholar

Jin, Dawei. 2013. Information structure constraints and complex NP islands in Chinese. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 110–120. CSLI.Google Scholar

Jones, Kimberly. 1990. Conflict in Japanese conversations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Jones, Kimberly and Ono, Tsuyoshi (eds.). 2008. Style Shifting in Japanese. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jorden, Eleanor and Noda, Mari. 1987. Japanese: The Spoken Language. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Josephs, Lewis. 1976. Complementation. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar, 307–369. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 1993. Bunpō to gokeisei [Grammar and word formation]. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2004. Keidōshi kōbun to shite no ‘Aoi me o shiteiru’-kōbun [Physical attribute sentences as a light verb construction]. Nihongo Bunpō 4, 22–37.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2006a. Property description as a voice phenomenon. In Tsunoda, Tasaku and Kageyama, Taro (eds.), Voice and Grammatical Relations, 85–114. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2006b. Gaikō-fukugōgo to jojutsu no taipu [External argument compounding and types of predication]. In Masuoka, Takashi et al. (eds.), Nihongo-bunpō no shinchihei [New horizons in Japanese grammar], 1–21. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2007. Explorations in the conceptual semantics of mimetic verbs. In Frellesvig, Bjarke et al. (eds.), Current Issues in the History and Structure of Japanese, 27–82. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2009. Kōzō-seiyaku to jojutsu-kinō [Structural constraints and predication functions]. Gengo Kenkyu 136, 1–34.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2010. Variation between endocentric and exocentric word structures. Lingua 120, 2405–2423.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro and Saito, Michiaki. 2016. Vocabulary strata and word formation processes. In Kageyama, Taro and Kishimoto, Hideki (eds.), The Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation, 11–50. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kameshima, Naoko. 1990. On aboutness conditions. JKL 1, 255–267.Google Scholar

Kamimura, Takaji. 1937. Koshikijima hōgen no kenkyū [A study of the Koshikijima dialect]. Mantetsu Kyōiku Kenkyūsho Kenkyū Yōhō 11, 319–348.Google Scholar

Kamimura, Takaji. 1941. Koshikijima hōgen no akusento [The accent of the Koshikijima dialect]. Onseigaku Kyōkai Kaihō 65/66, 12–15.Google Scholar

Kamio, Akio. 1979. On the notion speaker’s territory of information: A functional analysis of certain sentence-final forms in Japanese. In Bedell, George et al. (eds.), Explorations in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Kazuko Inoue, 213–231. Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar

Kamio, Akio. 1990. Jōhō no nawabari riron: Gengo no kinōteki bunseki [Territory of information: Functional analysis of language]. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Kamio, Akio. 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. JP 21, 67–100.Google Scholar

Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Karatsu, Mariko. 2004. Verbal and nonverbal negotiation in Japanese storytelling. In Szatrowski, Polly (ed.), Hidden and Open Conflict in Japanese Conversational Interaction, 121–161. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Karatsu, Mariko. 2010. Sharing a personal discovery of a taste: Using distal demonstratives in a storytelling about kakuni ‘stewed pork belly.’ In Szatrowski, Polly (ed.), Storytelling across Japanese Conversational Genre, 113–143. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Karatsu, Mariko. 2012. Conversational Storytelling among Japanese Women: Conversational Circumstances, Social Circumstances and Tellability of Stories. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Karatsu, Mariko. 2014. Repetition of words and phrases from the punch lines of Japanese stories about food and restaurants: A group bonding exercise. In Szatrowski, Polly (ed.), Language and Food: Verbal and Nonverbal Experiences, 185–207. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kataoka, Kuniyoshi. 1995. Affect in Japanese women’s letter writing: Use of sentence-final particles ne and yo and orthographic conventions. Pragmatics 5, 427–453.Google Scholar

Kato, Shigehiro. 2003. Nihongo shūshokukōzō no goyōronteki kenkyū [Pragmatic study of modifying structures in Japanese]. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Kato, Yasuhiko. 1985. Negative Sentences in Japanese. Sophia Linguistica 19. Sophia University.Google Scholar

Kato, Yasuhiko. 2000. Interpretive asymmetries of negation. In Horn, Laurence and Kato, Yasuhiko (eds.), Negation and Polarity, 62–87. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kawahara, Shigeto. 2006. A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of [+voice] in Japanese. Language 82, 536–574.Google Scholar

Kawahara, Shigeto. 2016. Japanese has syllables: A reply to Labrune (2012). Phonology 33, 169–194.Google Scholar

Kawakami, Shin. 1956. Buntō no intonēshon [Sentence-initial intonation]. Reprinted in 1995 in Nihongo Akusento Ronshū [A collection of papers on Japanese accent], 76–91. Kyūko Shoin.Google Scholar

Kawakami, Shin. 1957. Tōkyōgo no takuritsu kyōchō no onchō. [Tonal prominence in Tokyo Japanese]. Reprinted in 1995 in Nihongo Akusento Ronshū [A collection of papers on Japanese accent], 76–91. Kyūko.Google Scholar

Kawakami, Shin. 1963. Bunmatsu nado no jōshōchō ni tsuite [On phrase-final rises]. Reprinted in 1995 in Nihongo akusento ronshū [A collection of papers on Japanese accent], 274–298. Kyūko.Google Scholar

Kawakami, Shin. 1977. Nihongo onsei gaisetsu [Outline of Japanese phonetics]. Ōfūsha.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward. 1976. Towards a universal definition of subject. In Li, Charles (ed.), Subject and Topic, 303–334. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward. 1985. Relative clauses. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2, 141–170. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrases accessibility and universal grammar. LI 8, 63–99.Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth. 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kibe, Nobuko. 2000. Seinanbu kyūshū nikei akusento no kenkyū [Studies on the two-class-accent dialects of southwest Kyūshū]. Benseisha.Google Scholar

Kibe, Nobuko. 2010. Intonēshon no chiikisa: Shitsumonbun no intonēshon [Regional differences in intonation: Intonation in interrogative sentences]. In Kobayashi, Takashi and Shinozaki, Koichi (eds.), Hōgen no hakken – Shirarezaru chiikisa o shiru [Discovery of dialects – To find unknown regional differences], 1–20. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, Yasuto. 1994. Keigo [Honorifics]. Kadokawa.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, Yasuto. 1997. Keigo [Honorifics]. Kōdansha.Google Scholar

Kim, E. 2009. Gendaigo no rentaishūshokusetsu ni okeru joshi no [The particle no in the modificational construction in modern Japanese]. Nihongo Kagaku 25, 23–42.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1950a. “Gooku” to “gōku”: Hikionsetsu no teishō [Gooku and gōku: In support of the lengthening mora]. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 27, 46–59.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1950b. Kokugo dōshi no ichibunrui [A classification of Japanese verbs]. Gengo Kenkyu 15, 41–63. Reprinted in Haruhiko Kindaichi (ed.), 1976, Nihongo dōshi no asupekuto [Aspect in Japanese verbs], 5–26. Mugi.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1953. Fuhenka jodōshi no honshitsu: Kyakkanteki hyōgen to shukanteki no betsu ni tsuite [The essential nature of the conjugationless auxiliaries: On the distinction between objective and subjective expressions]. Kokugo Kokubun 22, 149–169.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1964. Watashi no hōgen kukaku. In Kenkyūkai, Nihon Hōgen (ed.), Nihon no hōgen kukaku [The classification of Japanese dialects], 71–94. Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1966. Kyōtsūgo no hatsuon to akusento. In Kyōkai, Nippon Hōsō (ed.), Nihongo Hatsuon Akusento Jiten, 5–30. Nippon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1967. Onsetsu, mōra oyobi haku [Syllable, mora, and beat]. In Nihongo on’in no kenkyū [Studies in Japanese phonology], 58–77. Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1978. Giongo/gitaigo gaisetsu [Outline of mimetic words]. In Asano, Tsuruko (ed.), Giongo/gitaigo jiten [Dictionary of phonomimes/phenomimes], 3–25. Kadokawa.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1985. Kyōtsūgo no hatsuon to akusento [Pronunciation and accent in the common language]. In Kyōkai, Nippon Hōsō (ed.), Nihongo Hatsuon Akusento Jiten [Japanese pronunciation and accent dictionary], 5–36. Nippon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.Google Scholar

Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1998. Kyōtsūgo no hatsuon to akusento [Pronunciation and accent in the common language]. In Kenkūyjo, NHK Hōsō Bunka (ed.), Nihongo hatsuon akusento jiten [Japanese pronunciation and accent dictionary], 90–122. Nippon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.Google Scholar

Haruhiko, Kindaichi and Kazue, Akinaga (eds.). 2001. Shin meikai nihongo askusento jiten [New easy-to-understand Japanese accent dictionary]. Sanseidō.Google Scholar

Kinjo, Hiromi. 1987. Oral refusals of invitations and requests in English and Japanese. Journal of Asian Culture 11, 83–106.Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 1984. “Iru, aru, oru”: Sonzai hyōgen no rekishi to hōgen. Eureka 16, 284–293.Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 1991. Judōbun no rekishi ni tsuite no ichi kōsatsu [An observation about the history of passive]. Kokugogaku 164, 1–14.Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 1994. Rentaishūshoku no ~ta ni tsuite [On ~ta as a noun modifier]. In Takubo, Yukinori (ed.), Nihongo no meishi shūshoku hyōgen [Noun modifying expressions in Japanese], 29–65. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 1997. The influence of translation on the historical development of the Japanese passive construction. Journal of Pragmatics 28, 759–779.Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 2003. Vācharu nihongo: Yakuwarigo no nazo [Virtual Japanese: The mysteries of role language]. Iwanami.Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi, Takayama, Yoshiyuki, Kinuhata, Tomohide, and Okazaki, Tomoko. 2011. Nihongoshi 3: Bunpōshi [A History of Japanese 3: A History of Japanese Grammar]. Iwanami.Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin. 1995. Introduction. In Kiss, Katalin (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages, 3–27. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul and Kiparsky, Carol. 1968. Fact. In Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl Erich (eds.), Recent Advances in Linguistics, 143–173. Mouton.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2005. Tōgokōzō to bunpō kankei [Syntactic structures and grammatical relations]. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2007. Negative scope and head raising in Japanese. Lingua 117, 247–288.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2008. On the variability of negative scope in Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 44, 379–435.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2009. On the formation of lexicalized negative adjectives. In Yumoto, Yoko and Kishimoto, Hideki (eds.), Goi no imi to bunpō [Lexical meanings and grammar], 47–64. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2013. Verbal complex formation and negation in Japanese. Lingua 135, 132–154.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki and Booij, Geert. 2014. Complex negative adjectives in Japanese: The relation between syntactic and morphological constructions. Word Structure 7, 55–87.Google Scholar

Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35, 379–415.Google Scholar

Kita, Sotaro. 2001. Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics 39, 419–436.Google Scholar

Kitagawa, Chisato. 1976. Naku-te to nai-de [Naku-te and nai-de]. Nihongokyōiku 29, 57–67.Google Scholar

Kitagawa, Chisato. 1983. On the two forms of negative gerund in Japanese. Papers in Linguistics 16, 89–126.Google Scholar

Kitamura, Masanori. 2008. “Odoroki/Kangai” o arawasu monoda-bun no kōzō henka – Kinsei ikō o chūshin ni [Structural changes of monoda sentences expressing “surprise/exclamation” since the seventeenth century]. Kokubungaku 92, 448–464.Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. Routledge.Google Scholar

Kluender, Robert. 1990. A neurophysiological investigation of wh-islands. BLS 16, 187–204.Google Scholar

Kluender, Robert and Kutas, Marta. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 573–633.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, Hideki. 2004. Gendai nihongo no kango-dōmeishi no kenkyū [A study of Sino-Japanese verbal nouns in present-day Japanese]. Hituzi.Google Scholar

Koike, Chisato. 2001. An analysis of shifts in participation roles in Japanese storytelling in terms of prosody, gaze and body movements. BLS 27, 353–370.Google Scholar

Koike, Chisato. 2003. An analysis of increments in Japanese conversation in terms of intonation and grammar. JKL 11, 67–80.Google Scholar

Koike, Chisato. 2009. Interaction in storytelling in Japanese conversations: An analysis of story recipients’ questions. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar

Koike, Chisato. 2010. Ellipsis and action in a Japanese joint storytelling series. In Szatrowski, Polly (ed.), Storytelling across Japanese Conversation Genre, 61–111. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Whitman, John. 2014. Food experience and categorization in Japanese talk-in-interaction. In Szatrowski, Polly (ed.), Language and Food: Verbal and Nonverbal Experiences, 159–183. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Koizumi, Masatoshi. 2008. Nominative objects. In Shigeru, Miyagawa and Saito, Mamoru (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 141–164. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Koji, Kazuteru. 1980. Man’yōshū jodōshi no kenkyū [Studies of the auxiliaries in the Man’yōshū]. Meiji.Google Scholar

Kokoma, Katsumi. 2014. “Jiyūdo” koso nihon kanji no miryoku [The appeal of Japanese characters because of the degree of freedom]. In Takada, Tomokazu and Yokoyama, Shoichi (eds.), Nihongo moji hyōki no muzukashisa to omoshirosa [Difficulties and pleasures of Japanese writing], 34–53. Sairyūsha.Google Scholar

Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo. 1964. Gendai zasshi 90-shu no yōji yōgo [Words and characters used in ninety modern magazines], Part III.Google Scholar

Komatsu, Toshio. 1988. Tōkyōgo ni okeru danjosa no keisei: Shūjoshi o chūshin to shite [Development of sex difference in Tokyo dialect: With a focus on sentence-final particles]. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 11, 94–106.Google Scholar

Konishi, Izumi. 2015. Hiroshima-shi hōgen no taikaku hyōji [The accusative marking in the Hiroshima city dialect]. Kokugo Kyōiku Kenkyū 56, 13–24.Google Scholar

Kori, Shiro. 1997. Nihongo no intonēshon: Kata to kinō [Japanese intonation: Its patterns and functions]. In Kunihiro, Tetsuya et al. (eds.), Nihongo onsei 2: Akusento intonēshon rizumu to pōzu [Sound in Japanese 2: Accent, intonation, rhythm, and pause], 169–202. Sanseidō.Google Scholar

Koyama, Tetsuharu. 1997. Bunmatsushi to bunmatsu intonēshon [Sentence-final particles and sentence-final intonation]. In Kenkyūkai, Onseibunpō (ed.), Bunpō to onsei [Grammar and sound], 97–119. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Carlson, Gregory and Pelletier, Francis (eds.), The Generic Book, 125–175. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred, Pelletier, Francis J., Carolson, Greg, ter Meulen, Alice, Chierchia, Bennaro, and Link, Godehard. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In Carlson, Gregory and Pelletier, Francis (eds.), The Generic Book, 1–124. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1988. The organization of Japanese prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh. [Published by Kurosio 1993.]Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1989. The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech 32, 249–278.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1993. Nihongo no onsetsu-ryō [Syllable weight in Japanese]. In Haraguchi, Shōsuke (ed.), Nihongo no mōra to onsetsu kōzō ni kansuru sōgō kenkyū (2) [Integrated research on Japanese mora and syllable structure (2)], 72–101. Osaka Gaikokugo Daigaku, Nihongo Gakka.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1995a. Constraint interaction in Japanese phonology: Evidence from compound accent. Phonology at Santa Cruz (PASC) 4, 21–38.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1995b. Gokeisei to on’in kōzō [Word formation and phonological structure]. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1997. Lexical markedness and variation: A non-derivational account. In Agbayani, Brian and Tang, Sze-Wing (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 273–287. CSLI.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1999. Mora and syllable. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 31–61. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2006a. Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116, 1140–1170.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2006b. Akusento no hōsoku [Laws of accent]. Iwanami.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2006c. The phonetic and phonological organization of speech in Japanese. In Nakayama, Mineharu et al. (eds.), The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics. Volume II Japanese, 191–200. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2007a. Tonal change in language contact: Evidence from Kagoshima Japanese. In Riad, Tomas and Gussenhoven, Carlos (eds.), Tones and Tunes. Vol. 1: Typological Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, 323–351. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2007b. Focus and intonation in Japanese: Does focus trigger pitch reset? In Ishihara, Shinichiro (ed.), Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, 1–27. Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2008. Japanese accent. In Miyagawa, Shigeru and Saito, Mamoru (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 165–191. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2010. Accentuation of alphabetic acronyms in varieties of Japanese. Lingua 120, 2323–2335.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2011. Japanese pitch accent. In van Oostendorp, Marc et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 5, 2879–2907. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2012a. Introduction: Special issue on varieties of pitch accent systems. Lingua 122, 1325–1334.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2012b. Varieties of pitch accent systems in Japanese. Lingua 122, 1395–1414.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2012c. Word-level vs. sentence-level prosody in Koshikijima Japanese. The Linguistic Review 29, 109–130.Google Scholar

Whitman, John. 2015a. Diphthongs and vowel coalescence. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, 215–249. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2015b. Japanese dialects and general linguistics. Gengo Kenkyu 148, 1–31.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2016. Diversity of pitch accent systems in Koshikijima Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 150, 1–31.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2017. Accent in Japanese phonology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics (online encyclopedia).Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 2018. Postlexical tonal neutralizations in Japanese, Kagoshima. In Kubozono, Haruo and Giriko, Mikio (eds.), Tonal Change and Neutralization, 27–57. Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo and Honma, Takeru. 2002. Onsetsu to mōra [Syllables and moras]. Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar

Kudo, Hiroshi. 1988. Bunpō ronsō. In Kaneda, Haruhiko (ed.), Nihongo hyakka jiten [Encyclopedia of Japanese], 152–159. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Kudo, Hiroshi. 2000. Fukushi to bun no chinjutsuteki na taipu [Adverbs and predicative sentence types]. In Moriyama, Takurō et al. (eds.), Modaritī [Modality], 164–234. Iwanami.Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid and Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2014. Introduction. Linguistics 52, 871–877.Google Scholar

Kumagai, Shigeko. 2010. Hōgen no rekishi: Wakai josei ga Tōhoku-ben o tsukai-nikui wake [A history of dialects: The reasons why it is difficult for young women to use Tohoku dialect]. In Nakamura, Momoko (ed.), Jendā de manabu gengogaku [Linguistics taught through gender], 50–65. Sekai Shisōsha.Google Scholar

Kumagai, Tomoko and Kitani, Naoyuki. 2010. Sansha mensetsu chōsa ni okeru komyunikēshon [Communication in three-party survey interviews]. Kurosio.Google Scholar

Kumatoridani, Tetsuo. 1999. Alternation and co-occurrence in Japanese thanks. JP 31, 623–642.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1972a. Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse. LI 3, 161–195.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1972b. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. LI 3, 269–320.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1978a. Danwa no bunpō [The grammar of discourse]. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1978b. Shin nihon bunpō kenkyū [A new study of Japanese grammar]. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1988. Blended quasi-direct discourse in Japanese. In Poser, William (ed.), Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, 75–102. CSLI.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1995. Null elements in parallel structures in Japanese. In Mazuka, Reiko and Nagai, Noriko (eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing, 209–33. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1983. Shin Nihon bunpō kenkyū [A new study of Japanese grammar]. Taishūkan.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu and Kaburaki, Etsuko. 1977. Empathy and syntax. LI 8, 627–672.Google Scholar