Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:16:25.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Biological Invasion of Wild Boar and Feral Pigs Sus scrofa (Suidae) in South America: Review and Mapping with Implications for Conservation of Peccaries (Tayassuidae)

from Part III - Conservation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

Mario Melletti
Affiliation:
AfBIG (African Buffalo Initiative Group), IUCN SSC ASG
Erik Meijaard
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altrichter, M., Taber, A., Beck, H., et al. (2012). Range-wide declines of a key Neotropical ecosystem architect, the Near Threatened white-lipped peccary Tayassu pecari. Oryx 46(1): 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballari, S. A., Cuevas, M. S., Cirignoli, S. & Valenzuela, A. E. J. (2015). Invasive wild boar in Argentina: using protected areas as a research platform to determine distribution, impacts and management. Biological Invasions 17(6): 15951602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrios-Garcia, M. N. & Ballari, S. A. (2012). Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14(11): 22832300.Google Scholar
Barrios-Garcia, M. N., Classen, A. T. & Simberloff, D. (2014). Disparate responses of above- and belowground properties to soil disturbance by an invasive mammal. Ecosphere 5(4): 113.Google Scholar
Batista, G. O. (2015). O javali (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 ) na região do Parque Nacional das Araucárias: percepções humanas e sua relação com regeneração de Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. Masters thesis. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2006). A review of peccary–palm interactions and their ecological ramifications across the Neotropics. Journal of Mammalogy 87(3): 519530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, H., Thebpanya, P. & Filiaggi, M. (2010). Do Neotropical peccary species (Tayassuidae) function as ecosystem engineers for anurans? Journal of Tropical Ecology 26(4): 407414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, H., Snodgrass, J. W. & Thebpanya, P. (2013). Long-term exclosure of large terrestrial vertebrates: implications of defaunation for seedling demographics in the Amazon rainforest. Biological Conservation 163: 115121.Google Scholar
Bonacic, C., Ohrens, O. & Hernández, F. (2010). Estudio de distribución y estimación poblacional de las especies exóticas invasoras: jabalí y ciervo rojo en Chile. Santiago: Laboratorio de Vida Silvestre Fauna Australis, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Brasil. (2000). Lei n° 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Brasília, Brasil: República Federativa do Brasil.Google Scholar
Brocardo, C. R. & Delgado, L.E., da, S. (2014). Records and conservation of white-lipped peccary in the region of Iguaçu National Park, Brazil. Suiform Soundings 13(1): 3843.Google Scholar
Canevari, M. & Vaccaro, O. (2007). Guía de mamíferos del sur de América del Sur. Buenos Aires: Literature of Latin America (LOLA).Google Scholar
Carpinetti, B. (2014). La Política del ‘Perro del Hortelano’. Caza Furtiva y Especies Exóticas en Bahía Samborombón. Avá 24: 17.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, S. M. C. (2008). Predator–prey relationships and spatial ecology of jaguars in the southern Pantanal, Brazil: implications for conservation and management, Logan: All Graduate Theses and Dissertation. Available at: http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/112.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, S. M. C. & Gese, E. M. (2010). Kill rates and predation patterns of jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southern Pantanal, Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy 91(3): 722736.Google Scholar
Chiarello, A. G., Aguiar, L. M. D. S., Cerqueira, R., et al. (2005). Mamíferos ameaçados de extinção no Brasil. In Machado, A. B., Martins, C. S. & Drummond, G. M. (eds.), Lista da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção. Belo Horizonte: Biodiversitas, pp. 681880.Google Scholar
Choquenot, D., McIlroy, J. & Korn, T. (1996). Managing vertebrate pests: feral pigs. Canberra: Bureau of Resource Sciences/Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Coblentz, B. E. & Baber, D. W. (1987). Biology and control of feral pigs on Isla Santiago, Galapagos, Ecuador. Journal of Applied Ecology 24(2): 403418.Google Scholar
Crawshaw, P.G., Mähler, J. K., Indrusiak, C. & Silvius, K. M. (2002). Ecology and conservation of the Jaguar (Panthera onca) in Iguaçu National Park, Brazil. In Silvius, K. M., Bodmer, R. E. & Fragoso, J. M. V. (eds.), People in nature: wildlife conservation in South and Central America. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 271285.Google Scholar
Cruz, J. B. & Cruz, F. (1987). Conservation of the dark-rumped petrel Pterodroma phaeopygia in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. Biological Conservation 42(4): 303311.Google Scholar
Cuevas, M. F., Novillo, A., Campos, C., Dacar, M. A. & Ojedo, R. A. (2010). Food habits and impact of rooting behaviour of the invasive wild boar, Sus scrofa, in a protected area of the Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 74(11): 15821585.Google Scholar
Daciuk, J. (1978). Estado actual de las espécies de mamíferos introducidos en la Subregión Aracuana (Rep. Argentina) y grado de coacción ejercido en algunos ecosistemas surcordilleranos. Anales de Parques Nacionales 14: 105130.Google Scholar
Data East Soft LLC. (2011). XTools Pro for ArcGIS® desktop. Version 8.0.0. Novosibirsk. Available at: www.dataeast.com.Google Scholar
Deberdt, A. J. & Scherer, S. B. (2007). O javali asselvajado: ocorrência e manejo da espécie no Brasil. Natureza & Conservação 5(2): 3144.Google Scholar
Desbiez, A. L. J. (2007). Wildlife conservation in the Pantanal: habitat alteration, invasive species and bushmeat hunting. PhD thesis. Canterbury: University of Kent Canterbury.Google Scholar
Desbiez, A. L. J., Keuroghlian, A., Piovezan, U. & Bodmer, R. E. (2009a). Population ecology of feral pigs in the Brazilian Pantanal, Corumbá: Embrapa Pantanal.Google Scholar
Desbiez, A. L. J., Santos, S. A., Keuroghlian, A. & Bodmer, R. E. (2009b). Niche partitioning among white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari), collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu), and feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Journal of Mammalogy 90(1): 119128.Google Scholar
Desbiez, A. L. J., Keuroghlian, A., Piovezan, U. & Bodmer, R. E. (2011). Invasive species and bushmeat hunting contributing to wildlife conservation: the case of feral pigs in a Neotropical wetland. Oryx 45(1): 7883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desbiez, A. L. J., Keuroghlian, A., de Mello Beisiegel, B., et al. (2012). Avaliação do Risco de Extinção do Cateto Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758, no Brasil. Biodiversiade Brasileira 2(3): 7484.Google Scholar
Donkin, R. A. (1985). The peccary: with observations on the introduction of pigs to the New World. American Philosophical Society 75(5): 1152.Google Scholar
ECOPAM. (2004). Plan de Manejo de la Reserva Provincial Parque Luro. Santa Rosa: Subsecretaría de Ecologia del Gobierno de La Pampa (ECOPAM).Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. (1958). The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Boston, MA: Springer. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4899-7214-9.Google Scholar
Emmons, L. H. (1987). Comparative feeding ecology of felids in a neotropical rainforest. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20(4): 271283. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00292180.Google Scholar
ESRI. (2016). World Administrative Divisions. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)/DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc. Available at: www.esri.com [accessed 4 January 2016].Google Scholar
Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brasheres, J. S., et al. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333(6040): 301306.Google Scholar
FAO. (2007). Gridded livestock of the world 2007. Wint, W. & Robinson, T. (eds.). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO).Google Scholar
Fonseca, C., Sicuro, F. L., Pinto, I. A., et al. (2014). The wild boar expansion in Brazil: current status, problems and future perspectives. In 10th International Symposium on Wild Boar and Other Suids. Velenje, p. 80.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, S.T. (2005). Levantamento e avaliação da Portaria 138/02 e Instrução Normativa 25/04, que regulamentaram o controle do javali (Sus scrofa) no Rio Grande do Sul no período compreendido entre 2003 e 2005. Produto PNUD, Projeto BRA/01/037. Porto Alegre: Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis.Google Scholar
Galetti, M., Camargo, H., Siqueira, T., et al. (2015). Diet overlap and foraging activity between feral pigs and native peccaries in the Pantanal. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0141459.Google Scholar
García, E., Mora, L., Torres, P., Jercic, M. I. & Mercado, R. (2005). First record of human trichinosis in Chile associated with consumption of wild boar (Sus scrofa). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 100(1): 1718.Google Scholar
García, G., Vergara, J. & Lombardi, R. (2011). Genetic characterization and phylogeography of the wild boar Sus scrofa introduced into Uruguay. Genetics and Molecular Biology 34(2): 329337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghione, S., Martino, D., Aldabe, J., et al. (2008). Biodiversidad. In PNUMA/CLAVES/DINAMA (ed.)., GEO Uruguay: informe del estado del ambiente. Montevideo: Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA)/ Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social (CLAES)/ Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente (DINAMA), pp. 180241.Google Scholar
GISD. (2016). Global Invasive Species Database: Sus scrofa. Available at: www.issg.org/database/species/distribution.asp?si=73&fr=1&sts=sss&lang=EN [Accessed 4 January 2016].Google Scholar
GISP. (2005). América do Sul invadida. Cape Town: Global Invasive Species Program (GISP).Google Scholar
Guimarães, T. C. S. (2015). Espécies Exóticas Invasoras da Fauna em Unidades de Conservação Federais no Brasil: Sistematização do Conhecimento e Implicações para o Manejo.Google Scholar
Hegel, C. G. Z. & Marini, M. Â. (2013). Impact of the wild boar, Sus scrofa, on a fragment of Brazilian Atlantic Forest Impacto. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 8(1): 1724.Google Scholar
Herrera, H. M., Abreu, U. G. P., Keuroghlian, A., Freitas, T. P. & Jansen, A. M. (2008). The role played by sympatric collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu), white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari), and feral pig (Sus scrofa) as maintenance hosts for Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma cruzi in a sylvatic area of Brazil. Parasitology Research 103(3): 619624.Google Scholar
Herrero, J. & Luco, D. F. De (2003). Wild boars (Sus scrofa L.) in Uruguay: scavengers or predators? Mammalia 67(4): 485591.Google Scholar
Hofmann, G. S. (2013). Taiassuídeos simpátricos no norte do Pantanal brasileiro: implicações da estacionalidade climática, do uso da terra e da presença de uma espécie invasora nas interações competitivas entre caititus (Pecari tajacu) e queixadas (Tayassu pecari).Google Scholar
IAP. (2009). Planos de conservação para aves e mamíferos ameçados no Paraná - Planos Completos. Curitiba: Instituto Ambiental do Paraná (IAP).Google Scholar
IBAMA. (1995). Portaria Ibama N° 7 de 26 de janeiro de 1995 do Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA). Diário Oficial da União 22(1): 13301333.Google Scholar
IBAMA. (2002). Portaria No 138, de 14 de outubro de 2002, do Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recurso Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA). Diário Oficial da União 200(1): 114.Google Scholar
IBAMA. (2004). Instrução Normativa No 25 de 31 de março de 2004 do Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recurso Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA). Diario Oficial da União 63(1): 91.Google Scholar
IBAMA. (2005). Instrução Normativa No 71 de 4 de agosto de 2005 do Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recurso Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA). Diario Oficial da União 152(1): 2829.Google Scholar
IBGE. (2015). Malhas digitais. Malhas digitais. Available at: ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/malhas_digitais/ [Accessed 31 December 2015].Google Scholar
Itow, S. (1995). Phytogeography and ecology of Scalesia (Compositae) endemic to the Galapagos Islands. Pacific Science 49(1): 1730.Google Scholar
IUCN. (2010). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Available at: www.iucnredlist.org [Accessed 27 October 2010].Google Scholar
IUCN & UNEP-WCMC. (2016). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)/World Conservation Monitoring Centre of United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP-WCMC). Available at: www.protectedplanet.net [Accessed 4 January 2016].Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E. & Langguth, A. (1987). Ecology and status of pampas deer in the Argentinian Pampas and Uruguay. In Wemmer, C. M. (ed.), Biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 402410.Google Scholar
Jácomo, A.T., de, A. (2004). Ecologia manejo e conservação do queixada Tayassu pecari no Parque Nacional das Emas e em propriedades rurais de seu entorno. Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Jaksic, F. M. (1998). Vertebrate invaders and their ecological impacts in Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation 7(11): 14271445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaksic, F. M., Iriarte, J. A., Jiménez, J. E. & Martinez, D. R. (2002). Invaders without frontiers: cross-border invasions of exotic mammals. Biological Invasions 4: 157173.Google Scholar
Kaizer, M. C., Novaes, C. M. & Faria, M. B. (2014). Wild boar Sus scrofa (Cetartiodactyla, Suidae) in fragments of the Atlantic Forest, southeastern Brazil: new records and potential environmental impacts. Mastozoologia Neotropical 21(2): 343347.Google Scholar
Kashivakura, C. K., Furtado, M. M., Jácomo, A. T. A., et al. (2003). Brucelose em queixadas Tayassu pecari, de vida livre da região do Parque Nacional das Emas. XXV Conbregsso Brasileiro de Zoologia, pp. 217218.Google Scholar
Keuroghlian, A. & Eaton, D. (2009). Removal of palm fruits and ecosystem engineering in palm stands by white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari) and other frugivores in an isolated Atlantic Forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 17331750.Google Scholar
Keuroghlian, A., Eaton, D. P. & Desbiez, A. L. J. (2008). Habitat use by peccaries and feral pigs of the Southern Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Suiform Soundings 8(2): 917.Google Scholar
Keuroghlian, A., Desbiez, A. L. J., de Mello Beisiegel, B., et al. (2012). Avaliação do Risco de Extinção do Queixada Tayassu pecari Link, 1795, no Brasil Alexine. Biodiversiade Brasileira 2(3): 84102.Google Scholar
Kiltie, R. A. (1981). Stomach contents of rain forest peccaries (Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari). Biotropica 13(3): 45.Google Scholar
Marocco, J. C. (2012). Fauna. In Plano de Manejo do Parque Estadual do Ibitiriá, pp. 88132. Porto Alegre: Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
MMA/CONABIO. (2009). Estratégia Nacional sobre Espécies Exóticas Invasoras. Resolução CONABIO n.o 05, de 21 de outubro de 2009. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA)/Comissão Nacional de Biodiversidade (CONABIO).Google Scholar
Mones, A. & Ximenez, A. (1980). Hallazgo de dos mamiferos extintos del Uruguay. Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciências (Série Ciências Biológicas) 1(12): 201206.Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772): 853858. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10706275.Google Scholar
Navas, J. R. (1987). Los vertebrados exóticos introducidos en la Argentina. Revista del Museum Argentino de Ciências Naturales Zoologia 2: 737.Google Scholar
Nobre, A. B., Devids, C. C., Giovanelli, J. G. R., et al. (2013). Diagnóstico da população de javaporco (Sus scrofa) na RPPN Entre Rios, avaliando os possíveis impactos na fauna e flora da região de abrangência. In Plano de Manejo da RPPN Entre Rios. Angatuba: Suzano Papel e Celulose, pp. 457466.Google Scholar
Novillo, A. & Ojeda, R. A. (2008). The exotic mammals of Argentina. Biological Invasions 10(8): 13331344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojeda, R. A., Novillo, A. & Cuevas, M. F. (2010). The exotic mammals of Argentina. In Settele, J., Penev, L., Georgiev, T., et al. (eds.), Atlas of biodiversity risk. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers, pp. 154155.Google Scholar
Oliveira, T. G. (2002). Ecología comparativa de la alimentación del jaguar y del puma en el neotrópico. In Medellín, R. A., Equihua, C., Chetkiewicz, C. L., et al. (eds.), El jaguar en el nuevo milenio. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Wildlife Conservation Society, pp. 265288.Google Scholar
Oliveira-Santos, L. G. R., Dorazio, R. M., Tomas, W. M. & Santos Fernandez, F. A. (2011). No evidence of interference competition among the invasive feral pig and two native peccary species in a Neotropical wetland. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27(5): 557561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., et al. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51(11): 933938.Google Scholar
Paine, C. E. T. & Beck, H. (2007). Seed predation by Neotropical rain forest mammals increases diversity in seedling recruitment. Ecology 88(12): 30763087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedrosa, F., Salerno, R., Padilha, F. V. B. & Galetti, M. (2015). Current distribution of invasive feral pigs in Brazil: economic impacts and ecological uncertainty. Natureza & Conservação 13(1): 8487.Google Scholar
Pérez Carusi, L. C., Beade, M. S., Miñarro, F., et al. (2009). Relaciones espaciales y numéricas entre venados de las Pampas (Ozotoceros bezoarticus celer) y chanchos cimarrones (Sus scrofa) en el refugio de vida silvestre Bahía Samborombón, Argentina. Ecologia Austral 19(1): 6371.Google Scholar
Pescador, M., Sanguinetti, J., Pastore, H. & Peris, S. (2009). Expansion of the introduced wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Andean region, Argentinean Patagonia. Galemys 21: 121132.Google Scholar
Poeta, A. P. (2015). Distribuição espacial de javalis asselvajados pelo estado do Rio Grande do Sul. O Biológico (Suplemento) 77: 57.Google Scholar
Reider, K. E., Carson, W. P. & Donnelly, M. A. (2013). Effects of collared peccary (Pecari tajacu) exclusion on leaf litter amphibians and reptiles in a Neotropical wet forest, Costa Rica. Biological Conservation 163: 9098.Google Scholar
Rosa, C. A. (2015). Mamíferos Exóticos Invasores no Brasil: situação atual, riscos potenciais e impactos da invasão de porcos selvagens em Florestas Tropicais Lavras, 2015. PhD thesis. Lavras: Universidade Federal de Lavras.Google Scholar
Salvador, C. H. (2012). Ecologia e manejo de javali (Sus scrofa L.) na América do Sul. PhD thesis. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Salvador, C. H. & Fernandez, F. A. S. (2014). Using the Eurasian wild boar phenotype as a basis to document a new process of invasion by Sus scrofa L. in a Neotropical biodiversity hotspot. Wildlife Biology in Practice 10(3): 2229.Google Scholar
Sampaio, A. B. & Schmidt, I. B. (2013). Espécies Exóticas Invasoras em Unidades de Conservação Federais do Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 3(2): 3249.Google Scholar
Sanguinetti, J. & Kitzberger, T. (2010). Factors controlling seed predation by rodents and non-native Sus scrofa in Araucaria araucana forests: potential effects on seedling establishment. Biological Invasions 12(3): 689706.Google Scholar
Santiago Silva, V., Bordin, L. C., Trevisol, I. M., et al. (2013a). Survey of Toxoplasma gondii, Brucella spp., and Leptospira sp. antibody in Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) from southern Brazil – partial results. In 2nd International Congress on Pathogens at the Human-Animal Interface (ICOPHAI): One Health for Sustainable Development. Porto de Galinhas: VPH-Biotech Global Consortium, p. 150.Google Scholar
Santiago Silva, V., Pellegrin, A.O., Mourão, G. M., et al. (2013b). Estruturação da vigilância epidemiológica e manejo populacional de suídeos asselvajados (Sus scrofa) para área livre de peste suína clássica do Brasil. O Biológico (Suplemento) 72(2): 33.Google Scholar
Santiago Silva, V., Rech, R. R., Silva, M. C., et al. (2013c). Muscular sparganosis in Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) from southern Brazil. In 2nd International Congress on Pathogens at the Human–Animal Interface (ICOPHAI): One Health for Sustainable Development. Porto de Galinhas: VPH-Biotech Global Consortium, p. 151.Google Scholar
Santiago Silva, V., Trevisol, I. M., Kramer, B., et al. (2015). Monitoramento sorológico de Peste Suína Clássica em suídeos asselvajados (Sus scrofa) no estado de Santa Catarina. O Biológico (Suplemento) 77: 32.Google Scholar
Santos, M. B., Quintela, F. M., Oliveira, S. V., Costa, R. C. & Uarth, A. (2009). Javalis e porcos ferais (Suidae, Sus scrofa) na restinga de Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: ecossistemas de ocorrência e dados preliminares sobre impactos ambientais. In IX Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil. São Lourenço: Sociedade de Ecologia do Brasil, pp. 14.Google Scholar
Sicuro, F. L. & Oliveira, L. F. B. (2002). Coexistence of peccaries and feral hogs in the Brazilian Pantanal wetland: an ecomorphological view. Journal of Mammalogy 83(1): 207217.Google Scholar
Silman, M. R., Terborgh, J. W. & Kiltie, R. A. (2003). Population regulation of a dominant rain forest tree by a major seed predator. Ecology 84(2): 431438.Google Scholar
Skewes, O. & Bustos, P. A. (2011). Estudio de distribución, estimación poblacional y vigilancia epidemiológica, de las especies exóticas invasoras: Jabalí y Ciervo Rojo, en la Región del Maule, Chile. Informe Final Convenio ASPRECER-Universidad de Concepción. Chillán: Universidad de Concepción.Google Scholar
Skewes, O. & Jaksic, F. M. (2015). History of the introduction and present distribution of the European wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Chile. Mastozoología Neotropical 22(1): 113124.Google Scholar
Skewes, O., Rodriguez, R. & Jaksic, F. M. (2007). Trophic ecology of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Chile. Revista Chilena De Historia Natural 80(3): 295307.Google Scholar
Souza, C. deBender, D. & Bazilio, S. (2015). Registro de Sus scrofa (Artiodactyla – Suidae) na Reserva Biológica das Araucárias, Paraná. In de Mattos, P. P., Marques, A. C., Vogt, G. A., et al. (eds.), II Seminário de Pesquisas da Floresta Nacional de Três Barras. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, pp. 7374.Google Scholar
Taber, A. B., Chalukian, S. C., Altrichter, M. & Zapata-Ríos, G. (2008). El destino de los arquitectos de los bosques neotropicales: evaluación de la distribución y el estado de conservación de los pecaríes labiados y los tapires de tierras bajas. Gland: Grupo Especialista de La CSE/UICN en Cerdos, Pecaríes y Hipopótamos.Google Scholar
Trovati, R. & Munerato, M. (2013). Occurrence record of Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) at Estação Ecológica de Itirapina, São Paulo state, Brazil. Check List 9(1): 136138.Google Scholar
Valério, L. A. J. (1999). Ocorrência e alimentação da linhagem javali (Sus scrofa Mammalia, Artiodactyla) em estado silvestre no sudoeste do Rio Grande do Sul. Master thesis. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
Weckel, M., Giuliano, W. & Silver, S. (2006a). Cockscomb revisited: jaguar diet in the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Belize. Biotropica 38(5): 687690. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00190.x/full [Accessed 12 September 2013].Google Scholar
Weckel, M., Giuliano, W. & Silver, S. (2006b). Jaguar (Panthera onca) feeding ecology: distribution of predator and prey through time and space. Journal of Zoology 270: 2530. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00106.x [Accessed 6 August 2013].Google Scholar
Ziller, S. R. & Dechoum, M. S. (2013). Plantas e vertebrados exóticos invasores em unidades de conservação no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 3(2): 431.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×