Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T18:05:18.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Creative Genius

from Manifestations of Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2019

James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Although creativity can assume many forms, one especially important type is creative genius, a guise of Big-C creativity rather than everyday little-c creativity. Creative geniuses make pervasive and enduring contributions to human civilization. This chapter reviews what research has learned about these superlative creators. The review begins by discussing the diverse domains to which creative geniuses contribute their masterworks. This discussion includes a treatment of the highly versatile polymaths. The review then turns to the correlates of genius across different creative domains, including both dispositional and developmental factors. From there, the overview looks at how to grade geniuses along a quantitative scale. The two primary measures are achieved eminence and creative productivity, where the latter is the main determinant of the former. That leads to a summary of the variables underlying creative output. Yet that summary requires scrutiny of the processes behind genius-grade creativity. Although a huge inventory of processes (and procedures) have been identified, all share two basic properties: All creativity is combinatorial and selectionist, meaning that the creator must be able and willing to generate combinations without any prior knowledge of their utility, whether at the individual level or at the level of the creator’s field. The review concludes with recommendations for future research.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acar, S. & Runco, M. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 341350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30, 140151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., & Krauze, T. K. (1982). Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review, 47, 615625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D. & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American heritage electronic dictionary (3rd edn). (1992). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bain, A. (1855/1977). The senses and the intellect (ed. by Robinson, D. N.). Washington, DC: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Barron, F. X. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Berry, C. (1981). The Nobel scientists and the origins of scientific achievement. British Journal of Sociology, 32, 381391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, W. D. (1970). Birth order of creative writers. Journal of Individual Psychology, 26, 200202.Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 198221). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassandro, V. J. (1998). Explaining premature mortality across fields of creative endeavor. Journal of Personality, 66, 805833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassandro, V. J. & Simonton, D. K. (2010). Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359377.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. & Drevdahl, J. E. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P. F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general population. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 248261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78 (7, Whole No. 584).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, D. (2014). Virtual genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 166182). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity and its applications. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 533545). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cziko, G. A. (1995). Without miracles: Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Roberts, B. W. (2015). The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 96105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso’s 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375393). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 623636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, F. (ed.). (1892/1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin and selected letters. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Eiduson, B. T. (1962). Scientists: Their psychological world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elms, A. C. (1988). Freud as Leonardo: Why the first psychobiography went wrong. Journal of Personality, 56, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. (2015). Of course animals are creative: Insights from Generativity Theory. In Kaufman, A. B. & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), Animal creativity and innovation (pp. 375390). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Creative genius: A view from the expert-performance approach. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 321349). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1910/1964). Leonardo da Vinci and a memory of his childhood (trans. by A. Tyson). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1998). Are there additional intelligences? The case for naturalist, spiritual, and existential intelligences. In Kane, J. (ed.), Education, information, and transformation (pp. 111131). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
Grosul, M. & Feist, G. J. (2014). The creative person in science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 3043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Hart, M. H. (2000). The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons in history (revised & updated). Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Pred, R. S. (1988). Making it without losing it: Type A, achievement motivation, and scientific attainment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 495504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. London: Longmans, Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2000–2001). Genius, lunatics and poets: Mental illness in prize-winning authors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20, 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (ed.). (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Y. & Kim, J. (2008). Scientific geniuses’ psychopathology as a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 251261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008). One-hit wonders in classical music: Evidence and (partial) explanations for an early career peak. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 179195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2015 ). Creativity and mental illness: The mad genius in question. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zythow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 12, 181194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1940). The behavioral mechanisms concerned with problem solving. Psychological Review, 47, 4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1972). Father absence, psychopathology, and poetic eminence. Psychological Reports, 31, 843847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martindale, C. (1995). Fame more fickle than fortune: On the distribution of literary eminence. Poetics, 23, 219234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R. & Greenberg, D. M. (2014). Openness to experience. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 222243). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2014). Genius in world civilization. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 486608). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ness, R. B. (2013). Genius unmasked. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nickles, T. (2003). Evolutionary models of innovation and the Meno problem. In Shavinina, L. V. (ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 5478). New York: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: A study of 291 world-famous men. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 2234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raskin, E. A. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (2015). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Acar, S., Kaufman, J. C., & Halliday, L. R. (2016). Changes in reputation and associations with fame and biographical data. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(1), 5058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 9296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, D. S. P., Wagner, M. E., & Schubert, H. J. P. (1977). Family constellation and creativity: Firstborn predominance among classical music composers. Journal of Psychology, 95, 147149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, W. T. (2014). The psychobiography of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 2032). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 11191133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 12731286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986). Biographical typicality, eminence, and achievement style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 230238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991c). Personality correlates of exceptional personal influence: A note on Thorndike’s (1950) creators and leaders. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 6778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997a). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 6689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997b). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2006). Creativity in Creating Minds: A retrospective evaluation. In Schaler, J. A. (ed.), Howard Gardner under fire: A rebel psychologist faces his critics (pp. 143168). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008a). Childhood giftedness and adulthood genius: A historiometric analysis of 291 eminent African Americans. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 243255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008b). Gender differences in birth order and family size among 186 eminent psychologists. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008c). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 2846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012a). Genius. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 492509). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012b). Foresight, insight, oversight, and hindsight in scientific discovery: How sighted were Galileo’s telescopic sightings? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 243254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013a). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why sightedness is inversely related to creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 253266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013b). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. In Chan, J. & Thomas, K. (eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 6983). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual-differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 6673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014b). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2014c). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015). Thomas Alva Edison’s creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016a). Creativity, automaticity, irrationality, fortuity, fantasy, and other contingencies: An eightfold response typology. Review of General Psychology, 20, 194204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016b). Reverse engineering genius: Historiometric studies of exceptional talent. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2017a). Domain-general creativity: On producing original, useful, and surprising combinations. In Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Glăveanu, V. P. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity across different domains (pp. 4160). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2017b). Eminent female psychologists in family context: Historical trends for 80 women born 1847–1950. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(2), 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2018a). Cultural-historiometric analyses of creativity. In Leung, A. K.-y., Kwan, L. Y-Y., & Liou, S. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture and creativity: Basic processes and applied innovations (pp. 6182). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2018b). Defining creativity: Don’t we also need to define what is not creative? Journal of Creative Behavior, 52, 8090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2018c). Intellectual genius in the Islamic Golden Age: Cross-civilization replications, extensions, and modifications. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 125135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. & Ting, S.-S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 5015–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). A Triangular Theory of Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Bridges, S. L. (2014). Varieties of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 185197). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. (1985). APA presidential addresses: The relation of integrative complexity to historical, professional, and personal factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 848852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2010). Why siblings are like Darwin’s Finches: Birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. In Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H. (eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 86119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2014). Openness to scientific innovation. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 546563). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1925–1959). Genetic studies of genius (5 vols.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Terry, W. S. (1989). Birth order and prominence in the history of psychology. Psychological Record, 39, 333337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combination of representations: Scientific discovery and technological invention. In Proctor, R. & Capaldi, E. J. (eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. & Stewart, T. C. (2011). The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 35, 133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tweney, R. D. (1989). A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. In Gholson, B., Shadish, W. R., Jr., Neimeyer, R. A., & Houts, A. C. (eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 342366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walberg, H. J., Rasher, S. P., & Hase, K. (1978). IQ correlates with high eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 196200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 2354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Case studies of genius: Ordinary thinking, extraordinary outcomes. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 139165). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, E. M. (2004). Eminence revisited. History of Psychology, 7, 265296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, R. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 460489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, K. B. (2010). Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: Correcting Price’s estimate. Scientometrics, 83, 471476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zusne, L. (1985). Contributions to the history of psychology: XXXVIII. The hyperbolic structure of eminence. Psychological Reports, 57, 12131214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×