Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Human Rights Watch
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Contents
- Foreword
- The Day After
- The Trouble With Tradition: When “Values” Trample Over Rights
- Without Rules: A Failed Approach to Corporate Accountability
- Lives in the Balance: The Human Cost of Environmental Neglect
- Photo Essays
- Africa
- Americas
- Asia
- Europe and Central Asia
- Middle East and North Africa
- United States
- 2012 Human Rights Watch Publications
The Trouble With Tradition: When “Values” Trample Over Rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2022
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Human Rights Watch
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Contents
- Foreword
- The Day After
- The Trouble With Tradition: When “Values” Trample Over Rights
- Without Rules: A Failed Approach to Corporate Accountability
- Lives in the Balance: The Human Cost of Environmental Neglect
- Photo Essays
- Africa
- Americas
- Asia
- Europe and Central Asia
- Middle East and North Africa
- United States
- 2012 Human Rights Watch Publications
Summary
“Tradition!” proclaims Tevye the milkman, in his foot-stomping opening to the musical Fiddler on the Roof. “Tradition!”
Tevye's invocation of the familiar as a buffer against the vagaries of his hardscrabble life rings true—after all, what is more reassuring, more innocuous, than the beliefs and practices of the past?
Which is why the resolution passed by the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) in September 2012 seems, at first blush, to be so benign.
Spearheaded by Russia, it calls for “promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms through a better understanding of traditional values of humankind.” It warns that traditions cannot be invoked to contravene rights, and even mentions such bedrock human rights instruments as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1993 Vienna Declaration, while calling for a survey of “best practices”—all in the name of “promoting and protecting human rights and upholding human dignity.”
By the sound of it, the resolution deserves a standing ovation.
But a close look at the context from which this resolution arose reveals that traditional values are often deployed as an excuse to undermine human rights. And in declaring that “all cultures and civilizations in their traditions, customs, religions and beliefs share a common set of values,” the resolution invokes a single, supposedly agreed-upon value system that steamrolls over diversity, ignores the dynamic nature of traditional practice and customary laws, and undermines decades of rights-respecting progress for women and members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities, among others.
In countries around the world, Human Rights Watch has documented how discriminatory elements of traditions and customs have impeded, rather than enhanced, people's social, political, civil, cultural, and economic rights.
In Saudi Arabia, authorities cite cultural norms and religious teachings in denying women and girls the right to participate in sporting activities—“steps of the devil” on the path to immorality, as one religious leader called them (Steps of the Devil, 2012). In the United States in the early 1990s, “traditional values” was the rallying cry for evangelist Pat Robertson's “Culture War”—code for opposition to LGBT and women's rights that he claimed undermined so-called family values.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- World Report 2013Events of 2012, pp. 20 - 28Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2013
- 2
- Cited by