Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-26vmc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:40:48.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2024

Jill S. Gross
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York
Hank V. Savitch
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Kentucky and Florida Atlantic University
Get access

Summary

Megacity change

During the course of editing this manuscript, our editor, Alison Howson, questioned whether New York crises were “inevitable”. The question penetrated all that we had written and touches on a key finding of our work – the centrality of crisis. Our model of change at the beginning of this volume, locates crises/tensions between growth on one hand and adaptation on the other hand. While tensions refer to “pressures” emanating from groups, “crises” are transition points that can morph into system- wide breakdown. As such they are pivotal to transformation. Crises can also generate innovation, as evidenced by the flood- resistant redesign of Lower Manhattan put into motion after superstorm Sandy. While “inevitable” is not the word we would use, crises have been a major part of the New York's history and some authors have treated it as an inevitability.

Crises have a certain tenacity and seem to always lurk in the background of any serious event. Such was evident across the cases and themes documented throughout this volume. Hence, tensions in the system are seen as having the potential for leading to crises, and ultimately regime change. The most recent incidents of protests/riots in the summer of 2020 and subsequent rising crime rates in 2021– 22 were serious enough to disrupt political and social order. Given enough duration and severity the electorate might have turned towards extremes of left or right. While voters did not take to the extremes, instances of sequential disorder tell us something about the fragility of change.

The protests/riots of 2020 had ample precedent and like most critical events they had both distant and proximate causes. The distant cause revolved around police abuse all too common in encounters with African- American neighbourhoods. The proximate cause or immediate “trigger” for rioting usually entailed an incident between citizens and the police or between different social classes that resulted in injury or death.

During the 1960s protests/riots erupted throughout the megacity. In Harlem riots burst onto the streets in 1964, due to the shooting of a black youth by a white off- duty police officer, and again in 1968 following the assassination of Martin Luther King.

Type
Chapter
Information
New York , pp. 159 - 170
Publisher: Agenda Publishing
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusions
  • Jill S. Gross, Hunter College, City University of New York, Hank V. Savitch, University of Louisville, Kentucky and Florida Atlantic University
  • Book: New York
  • Online publication: 20 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781788212052.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusions
  • Jill S. Gross, Hunter College, City University of New York, Hank V. Savitch, University of Louisville, Kentucky and Florida Atlantic University
  • Book: New York
  • Online publication: 20 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781788212052.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusions
  • Jill S. Gross, Hunter College, City University of New York, Hank V. Savitch, University of Louisville, Kentucky and Florida Atlantic University
  • Book: New York
  • Online publication: 20 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781788212052.008
Available formats
×